Historic Preservation CommissionThursday, October 11, 2018

7:00 PMVillage Boardroom

24401 W. Lockport StreetPlainfield, IL 60544

Agenda

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTESApproval of the Minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission held on August 9,2018.2018-08-09 HPC Minutes.pdf

CHAIR'S COMMENTS

COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS

PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minutes per topic)

OLD BUSINESS

NEW BUSINESSCASE No.: 1813-080718.DEMOREQUEST: Demolition (Public Hearing)LOCATION: 24115 W. Commercial St.APPLICANTS: Tom Ruane24115 W. Commercial Street Staff Report and Graphics.pdf

DISCUSSION

1

Historic Preservation Commission Page - 2

REMINDERS - Next Village Board – October 15, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.Next Plan Commission – October 16, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.

ADJOURN

2

Agenda Item No:

Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item ReportMeeting Date: October 11, 2018Submitted by: Tracey EricksonSubmitting Department: Planning Department Item Type: MinutesAgenda Section: APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES

Subject:Approval of the Minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission held on August 9, 2018.

Suggested Action:

Attachments:2018-08-09 HPC Minutes.pdf

3

Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission

Record of Minutes Date: August 9, 2018 Location: Village Hall CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, PLEDGE Chairman Bortel called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken: Commissioners Lucas, Barvian, Schmidt (7:06 p.m.), Derrick, Hendricksen, Hagen, Rapp and Chairman Bortel were present. Commissioner Olsen was absent. Also in attendance: Jake Melrose, Economic Development Manager; Kendra Kuehlem, Associate Planner; and Tracey Erickson, Recording Secretary. Chairman Bortel led the pledge to the flag. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Derrick made a motion to approve the agenda. Seconded by Commissioner Rapp. Voice Vote. All in favor. 0 opposed. Motion carried 7-0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Derrick made a motion to approve the June 14, 2018 minutes as amended. Voice Vote. All in favor. 0 opposed. Motion carried 7-0. Chairman Bortel stated Commissioner Schmidt has arrived. CHAIR’S COMMENTS No Comment. COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS No Comment. PUBLIC COMMENT Tom Ruane wanted to invite the HPC to a tour the home at 24115 W. Commercial Street because he has made application for demolition. Chairman Bortel stated the commission will speak after the meeting to discuss a date that will work for a tour. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 1811-072718.COA.FG.SPR 24136 W. Lockport St. Robert Rovito Ms. Kuehlem stated the applicant is seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for exterior building modifications to update their restaurant, currently known as Volar, for a new restaurant, Giambotta. The case has been considered by the Plan Commission for a site plan review, and will also go before the Village Board for approval of a Façade Reimbursement Grant, and Certificate of Appropriateness. The applicant is a tenant to the subject site and the property owner has granted approval for the proposed improvements. Ms. Kuehlem stated the subject site is approximately 19,821 square feet with an existing two-story building that was once a house, with an attached porch (701 W. Lockport St.). Currently, it is utilized as a restaurant with outdoor seating out front, and located in the Downtown Historic District. The Plainfield Historic Urbanized Core Survey from 2005 states that the subject house is a Gabled Ell Greek Revival house, that is one of few remaining in the Village. The survey further states that the building is easily interpreted as being an early Village house. 4

Historic Preservation Commission Minutes August 9, 2018 Page 2 of 4 Ms. Kuehlem reviewed the Analysis and the U.S. Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation from the staff report dated August 1, 2018. Ms. Kuehlem stated staff is confident that these modifications will preserve the historic integrity of the building, while modernizing it for a commercial use. Staff would like to note that the applicant has been very receptive to staff recommendations, and is open to any further suggestions. Staff supports the applicant’s proposed exterior modifications and site plan review. Chairman Bortel swore in Dario Rovito, applicant; and Allen Olsen, Architect. Mr. Rovito stated the restaurant would become a wood burning oven pizza restaurant and explained what they are trying to accomplish with the façade renovation. Commissioner Hendricksen stated he would like the lights on the building to stay true to the era of the building’s architecture. Commissioner Hendricksen asked the applicant if they will keep the same height and width of the windows. Mr. Rovito stated yes. Commissioner Hendricksen asked the applicant to retain the original window sashes if the windows were to be removed. Mr. Rovito stated he will do so. Commissioner Schmidt asked the applicant if the front door would be changing. Mr. Rovito stated the current door is like what is found on a residential home and they would like to replace the door with a more commercial double door. Commissioner Hagen asked what constitutes residential framing for the front door. Mr. Olsen explained the door will be framed with wood not metal. Commissioner Rapp asked if the proposed picture window top panes will be clear glass. Mr. Olsen stated yes, the intent was to reduce the scale so it does not look like a commercial window. Commissioner Derrick asked if there is any evidence that there was a picture window there before. Mr. Rovito stated not to his knowledge. Commissioner Derrick indicated that the survey states that some of the windows are replacement windows and asked if the existing front windows are replacement windows. Mr. Rovito stated he is not aware if they are replacement windows. Chairman Bortel asked the applicant if they are removing the windows to the east side of the porch. Mr. Olsen stated the windows will remain and that there was a mistake in the drawing. Chairman Bortel stated this building is part of the National Register District and explained how the picture window will affect the house. Chairman Bortel asked what the reason is for the picture window. Mr. Rovito explained how the picture window will allow them to showcase the wood burning oven and will allow for more natural lighting. Chairman Bortel suggested the applicant remove the awnings from the current windows to allow for more natural light. Commissioner Derrick explained that the commission is responsible for applying the U.S. Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation to properties that contribute to the district. Commissioner Derrick stated the picture window is not true to the style of this building and explained why. Commissioner Derrick asked if the extra light from the picture window is worth sacrificing character defining features of the building. Commissioner Derrick stated she has five standards from U.S. Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation that the picture window does not comply with and 2 from the commissions’ general guidelines. Commissioner Derrick explained why she does not take issue with the awning removal, the patio area, fencing, and the arbor. Commissioner Derrick indicated that the door and the picture window are problematic to her and suggested considering different window and door design that would be more appropriate for the period. Mr. Rovito stated he is open to different options and wants to preserve the historic aspect of the building. Chairman Bortel asked the applicant if the side door is ADA accessible. Mr. Rovito stated yes. Chairman Bortel stated the front door does not need to be ADA and indicated that the double door takes away 5

Historic Preservation Commission Minutes August 9, 2018 Page 3 of 4 from the massing of the building and suggested having a larger front door instead. Chairman Bortel stated the 3 windows currently on the front of the house are more appropriate than the picture window, and suggested removing the awnings to let in more light. Chairman Bortel also suggested a UV film for the windows. Chairman Bortel explained the Federal Tax credit that could be taken advantage of if they do not put in the picture window. Commissioner Schmidt asked if the applicant has considered using four windows instead of a single picture window. Commissioner Schmidt also indicated that the proposed double door has a craftsman feel. Mr. Rovito stated he is here this evening to hear the commission’s suggestions. Mr. Rovito explained how the picture window would display the wood burning oven and the art of being a pizzaiolo. Chairman Bortel asked where the oven will be located. Mr. Rovito explained the placement of the oven and how it will be visible from the street. Chairman Bortel asked where the vent for the oven will be. Mr. Olsen explained the placement of the vent for the oven. Commissioner Hagen indicated he is conflicted because he understands how the picture window would be inviting. Commissioner Derrick asked staff if we have evidence that the current windows are replacement windows. Ms. Kuehlem stated she is not aware if they are original or replacement. Chairman Bortel showed an example of an upright and wing restoration. Commissioner Derrick stated we do not have the evidence that the current windows are replacement windows. Commissioner Derrick stated the doorway is not original or consistent with the style of the house, so there is more flexibility there. Commissioner Derrick suggested Commissioner Hendericksen stated the commission is an advisory board and he feels that the picture window seems to be the issue tonight and explained that the commission is there to preserve. Commissioner Hendericksen stated the Village Board will have final approval. Commissioner Derrick asked if the applicant is going to face the foundation with stone. Mr. Olsen indicated that it is not final and explained why. Chairman Bortel asked what the stone in the basement and exposed foundation is made up of. Mr. Olsen stated it is rubble. Chairman Bortel suggested the applicant use Joliet limestone to cover the foundation if they choose to do so. Commissioner Derrick explained that any changes should be consistent with the original materials. Mr. Rovito indicated that covering of the foundation is not a priority. Chairman Bortel asked each commissioner their thoughts. Commissioner Rapp stated the picture window will take away the historical value of the property. Commissioner Hagen indicated the picture window will not be compatible but can see how the window will be an attraction. Commissioner Hendricksen suggested an additional light would help and thanked the applicant for their presentation. Commissioner Lucas thanked the applicant and agreed with what has been said about the picture window. Commissioner Barvian stated in his building downtown they added an awning because of all the light and suggested the applicant work with the State for tax credit. Commissioner Schmidt indicated the picture window would damage the historical character and indicated the picture window looks clunky and is not in character with the house. Chairman Bortel suggested the applicant remove the awning now to see if there would be enough light. Chairman Bortel indicated even though the commission is advisory, he feels the Village Board listens to their suggestions. Commissioner Derrick made a motion to recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for Giambotta Pizza located at 24136 W. Lockport Street with the following stipulations: 6

Historic Preservation Commission Minutes August 9, 2018 Page 4 of 4

1. Windows- To preserve the original window openings and existing windows. Historic Preservation Commission approves the removable of the awnings.

2. Front (south) door- The Historic Preservation Commission approves opening the entry to fit a double leaf door that is consistent with the style.

3. Lighting- The Historic Preservation Commission requests the spec sheets for the lighting to ensure it is consistent with the style.

4. Foundation- Should the applicant decided at a future date to make changes to cover the exposed foundation, the Historic Preservation Commission would like the applicant to consider Joliet limestone for the facing.

Seconded by Commissioner Hendricksen. Vote by roll call: Lucas, yes; Barvian, yes; Schmidt, no; Hagen, no; Rapp, no; Hendericksen, yes; Derrick, yes; Bortel, yes. Motion carried 5-3. DISCUSSION No Discussion. ADJOURN Commissioner Hendricksen made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Rapp seconded the motion. Voice vote. All in favor; 0 opposed. Motion carried 8-0. Meeting adjourned at 8:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Tracey Erickson Recording Secretary Click on the link to view the video of the August 9, 2018 Historical Preservation Commission Meeting. http://plainfieldil.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=369.

7

Agenda Item No:

Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item ReportMeeting Date: October 11, 2018Submitted by: Tracey EricksonSubmitting Department: Planning Department Item Type: New Business ItemAgenda Section: NEW BUSINESS

Subject:CASE No.: 1813-080718.DEMOREQUEST: Demolition (Public Hearing)LOCATION: 24115 W. Commercial St.APPLICANTS: Tom Ruane

Suggested Action:

Attachments:24115 W. Commercial Street Staff Report and Graphics.pdf

8

Ii I II ,TI-;;; ... •111 11 111 1+1.!i -.-.-.-•• ···,1, -,i='•1•=,··· -.-•,1

V1LLAGI! O'l> .

PLAINFIELD

TO: FROM:

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 4-J­KENDRA KUEHLEM, ASSOCIATE PLANNER

DATE: OCTOBER 8, 2018 SUBJECT: REPORT TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

24115 W. COMMERCIAL STREET CASE No. 1813-080718.DEMO

REQUEST:

LOCATION:

APPLICANT:

CURRENT ZONING:

COMP. PLAN:

DISCUSSION

Demolition (Public Hearing)

24115 W. Commercial Street

Tom Ruane

R-1 Single- Family Residential

Village Residential

Michael P. Collins PRESIDENT

Michelle Gibas VILLAGE Cl.ERK

TRUSTEES Margie Bonuchi

Bill Lamb Cally Larson

Larry D . Newton Edward O'Rourke Brian Wojowski

The applicant is the owner of the parcel at 24115 W. Commercial Street, which is improved with a small home that dates back to the 1860's. The structure is in need of maintenance and repair. The petitioner is proposing to demolish the existing structure. As a contributing structure, such request is subject to public hearing and recommendation by the Historic Preservation Commission to determine if a community impact study is recommended.

Existing Conditions/ Site Context The subject property, formerly 604 W. Commercial Street, is a small parcel of approximately 10,600 square feet. The property is currently zoned R-1 single-family residential. The adjacent land uses, zoning, and street classifications are as follows:

North: Commercial Street (Local); Single-Family Residences (R-1) East: Single-Family Residences (R-1) South: Plainfield Central High School (R-1) West: Single-Family Residences (R-1)

ANALYSIS The subject site is included in the Historic Urbanized Core Survey prepared by ArchiSearch in 2005 (attached). The building was constructed circa 1860 and while the property is not recommended for local or National Register landmark status, the survey does

24401 W. Lockport Street Plainfield, IL 60544

Phone (815) 436-7093 Fax (815) 436-1950 Web www.plainfield-il.org

9

REPORT TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Page #2 of 2 1813-080718.DEMO 10/8/2018 24115 W. COMMERCIAL ST. indicate that the house would contribute to a historic district. As a contributing structure, the demolition permit ordinance calls for the Historic Preservation Commission to hold a public hearing to determine if an “alternatives analysis” and 90-day delay in action on demolition permit is warranted. In order for the Historic Preservation Commission to recommend requiring the “alternatives analysis”, at least one of the following findings of fact must be demonstrated:

a) The Village’s urban or rural survey shall identify the property as a potential landmark or contributing structure and there is sufficient architectural significance to warrant a delay in the demolition;

b) The property has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places; c) The property has been listed on the Illinois Historic Structure Survey or alternatively the

Will County or Kendall County Historic Surveys. d) The property has been determined to be eligible on the National Register of Historic

Places; or e) The property is listed as a significant historic place or contributing structure based on a

historical survey or historical tract search. The property is not listed on the National Register nor is it identified by ArchiSearch as being eligible. Staff submits that the two most relevant findings are with respect to a) whether the architectural significance of the building warrants further study and e) whether there is a basis for pursuing adaptive reuse based on significant history of the building. The Historic Urbanized Core Survey highlighted several neighborhoods in the Village that would qualify for a historic district designation. The subject property was identified to contribute to the Village of Plainfield Historic District, Village Green Historic District, Original Town Historic District, and Early Settlement Thematic Historic District. Staff finds that the adjacent properties would still create a logical connection of the possible Original Town Historic District, if the subject property is demolished. The Original Town Historic District suggested boundaries are attached to show how the subject site does not hinder future designation of adjacent properties. Staff believes the issue of the condition of the building and the viability of restoring it to a modern use is an important consideration. Staff notes that the Historic Preservation Commission did a walk-through of the home on August 16th, 2018. Additionally, the applicant has provided a quote of the cost estimates associated with rehabilitated of the subject property that total $191,632 (attached); and two renderings of possible residential elevations should the demolition of the subject site proceed (attached). CONCLUSION Demolition is always identified as a last resort but in instances where it is not economically viable to restore a building and in circumstances where the history and/or architectural significance of the structure are limited, demolition may be the most appropriate action. The applicant would propose to build a new, residential structure on the site. The Historic Preservation Commission has an opportunity to make a recommendation on the demolition request. 10

2411

5 W

. CO

MM

ER

CIA

L S

T.

11

12

HISTORIC URBANIZED CORE SURVEY Plainfield Historic Preservation CommissionADDRESS 24115 W. Commercial St.

PIN/Property Index Number#06-03-16-219-011-0000

Historic Property Name(s)

Common Name(s)

Architectural Styleno style

Vernacular Building TypeUpright and Wing

Construction Datec. 1860

Architect/Builder

Historic Use(s)Single Family Residential

Present Use(s)Single Family Residential

History (associated events, people, dates)Assessor’s Subdivision plat. Appears on the 1931 (address of 693) Sanborn map, the first to show this block, as tworectangular sections, with the lower 1 story east section off-set to the south from the taller 1-1/2 story section. The 1944Sanborn shows a garage has been added in the extant location. Illegible notations are on the building and just beneaththe building. No porch is shown. The foundation is much later than the building, so it was either raised or relocated

around the turn of the century. DescriptionPainted rock-faced concrete block is a later addition to the house; light yellow synthetic siding; asphalt shingle front andside gable roofs. 1-1/2 and 1 stories; L-shape; 5 front bays and 3 east piles. Shed reentrant angle porch east, raisedconcrete stoop. Small 1/1 double-hung sash, entrance, and historic 3vertical/2 paired sash. Upright with two 1/1 1st story,shorter 1/1 upper story. 1/1 face east/side out of front gable, with same pattern of a shorter upper story window; the firststory window is clipped by the porch. Lower 1 story side gable wing with small 1/1 front/left of entrance. 1 story shed torear with single 1/1. Interior end chimney on side gable wing. 2 bay west elevation from Upright also with smaller 2nd

story windows. Integrity/Major Physical changes from original constructionWalls. Replacement windows. Porch enclosed, perhaps historically, but now with modern materials. Subsidiary Building(s)/SiteBroad side lot east. Gravel drive to garage/shed at rear lot. Short front setback and deep rear lot. High school torear/south. Side gable single car shiplap sided garage with eave extension; old garage door faces front/north. Lower gableshiplap sided wing to east with pedestrian door off center to east and two 4-light sash set high; blind on east elevation.Registration & EvaluationNational Register of Historic Places: Currently Listed: ___yes X noIf not currently listed, recommend: Individually ___yes X no; historic district X yes ___noContributing X X or non-contributing ___ Significance statement: Contributes to several possible historic districts as well as being part of the Early Settlementthematic designation. Despite materials changes, the building significantly retains its form and historic outbuilding.VP; VG&Comm; OT; EST.Village of Plainfield designation: Currently Listed: ___yes X noIf not currently listed, recommend: Historic Landmark ___ yes X no; Historic District X yes ___noContributing XX or non-contributing ___Form prepared by: ArchiSearch Historic Preservation Consultants (Alice Novak) Date of Field Survey: 8.25.05 - 38

604 W. Commercial St.

13

HISTORIC URBANIZED CORE SURVEY Plainfield Historic Preservation CommissionADDRESS

604 W. Commercial St.PIN/Property Index Number

#06-03-16-219-011-0000

Camera facing south. Right/west section of garage is that whichappears on the 1944 Sanborn map, with the east section addedlater, but historically.

24115 W. Commercial St.

14

15

16

Firs

t Flo

or1'

-1

1/2"

Seco

nd F

loor

11' -

2 5/

8"

Roo

f19

' -3

3/4"

Base

men

t-8

' -6"

T.O

. Foo

ting

-8' -

10"

B.O

. Foo

ting

-9' -

8"

Foun

datio

n 0"

16" / 12"

16" / 12"

16" / 12"

16" / 12"

16" / 12"

16" / 12"

8" / 12"

3 1/2" / 12"

8" / 12"

5" / 12"

6" /

12"

6" /

12"

12" / 12"

5" / 12"8" / 12"

8' - 1 1/8" 10' - 1 1/8"

1' - 1 1/2"

8' - 10" 10"

2' - 0"

2' - 0"

2' - 2"

AA

AA

AA

AA

A

F

CC

CC

CDE

E-9

E-6

E-9

00 E-2

E-1

E-19

E-1

E-1

E-9

E-7

E-6

E-32

E-30

E-29

Firs

t Flo

or1'

-1

1/2"

Seco

nd F

loor

11' -

2 5/

8"

Roo

f19

' -3

3/4"

Base

men

t-8

' -6"

T.O

. Foo

ting

-8' -

10"

B.O

. Foo

ting

-9' -

8"

Foun

datio

n 0"

16" / 12"

8" / 1

2"

8" / 1

2"

16" / 12"

E-18

E-9

E-6

E-27

E-28

E-27

E-25

E-7

E-14

E-10

E-20

Firs

t Flo

or1'

-1

1/2"

Seco

nd F

loor

11' -

2 5/

8"

Roo

f19

' -3

3/4"

Foun

datio

n 0"

AA

F

CC16" / 12"

16" / 12"

5" /

12"

E-9

E-6

E-27

E-19E-26

E-18

E-6E-

9

E-27

E-15

ww

w.a

rchs

tudi

oltd

.net

Scal

e

Proj

ect n

umbe

r

Dat

e

Dra

wn

by

Che

cked

by

1442

1 O

akle

y Av

eO

rland

Par

k, IL

604

62Te

l: 70

8-93

3-42

00Fa

x: 7

08-9

66-0

854 As

indi

cate

d

8/14/2018 4:33:01 PM

A-1.

0

Elev

atio

ns 2018

-077

Lot 1

Der

by P

ines

C3

Dev

elop

ers

08-1

0-20

18Au

thor

Che

cker

No.

Descrip

tion

Date

3/16

" = 1

'-0"

1Fr

ont E

leva

tion

1" =

10'

-0"

2Le

ft Si

de E

leva

tion

1/8"

= 1

'-0"

3R

ight

Sid

e El

evat

ion

Keyn

ote

Lege

ndKe

yVa

lue

Keyn

ote

Text

00 E-1

Hard

ie B

oard

- Fi

ber c

emen

t ver

tical

boar

d an

d ba

tten

sidin

g in

stalle

d pe

rm

anuf

actu

rer's

spec

ifica

tions

and

bes

tpr

actic

esE-

2Ha

rdie

Boa

rd 2

x6 c

orne

r boa

rds

E-6

Pref

inish

ed a

lum

inum

gut

ter a

nddo

wns

pout

sE-

7Co

ncea

led

met

al fl

ashi

ngE-

930

Yea

r com

posit

e as

phal

t shi

ngle

sov

/ 15

# b

uild

ing

felt

w/

Gra

ce Ic

ean

d W

ater

Shi

eld

to e

xten

d fr

om ro

ofed

ge to

min

. 2'-0

" with

in li

ne o

f the

build

ing

enev

elop

e, m

easu

red

from

the

E-10

Exte

rior g

rade

ligh

t fix

ture

LED

bul

bE-

14Ki

ck-o

ut fl

ashi

ng ty

p.-s

ee d

etai

lE-

156x

6 Ce

dar w

all b

rack

ets

E-18

Roof

Ven

t-min

. 52

sqin

cle

ar n

et v

ent

E-19

Fini

sh G

rade

-see

Civ

il En

gine

erDr

awin

gs fo

r fur

ther

Info

rmat

ion

E-20

Valle

y Fl

ashi

ngE-

25Ha

rdie

Boa

rd -

Fibe

r cem

ent l

apsid

ing

insta

lled

per m

anuf

actu

rer's

spec

ifica

tions

and

bes

t pra

ctice

sE-

26St

one

sill w

ith p

vc si

ll fla

shin

g w

ithdr

ip e

dge

and

wick

type

wee

p ho

les

@ 1

6" o

.c.E-

27Ty

pica

l Bric

k ve

neer

con

struc

tion

E-28

Brick

solid

er c

ours

eE-

29St

one

pier

E-30

6" st

one

cap

with

4 w

ay w

ash

E-32

Tape

red

colu

mn

wra

p ov

er 6

x 6

treat

ed w

ood

post

Not

e:

2015

Inte

rnat

iona

l Ene

rgy

Cons

erva

tion

Cod

e is

to b

e us

ed f

or p

urpo

se o

f de

sign

and

code

enf

orce

men

t for

this

hous

e.

17

18

24115 (604) W. Commercial 06-03-16-219-011-0000

That part of NE ¼ of Sec. 16 – beginning 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 in Shreffler’s Addition, thence running South 132’, West 80’, North 132’ & East 80’ to place of beginning or

W ½ of Lot 6 in the Assessor’s Subdivision GRANTOR GRANTEE 7/31/2018 Ruane, Thomas/Margaret [MTG – R2018054285] $131,120 1st Merchants Bank 7/31/2018 Ozbolt, Arnold L./Linda A. [WD – R2018054284] Ruane, Thomas/Margaret 1/16/2004 Ozbolt, Arnold L./Linda A.[MTG – R2004030311] $116,000 Founder’s Bank 1/16/2004 Spangler, Raymond I. [Trustee Deed – R2004030310] $145,000 Ozbolt, Arnold L./Linda A. Spangler, Dale R. Spangler, Roy W./David M./David 9/30/1994 Spangler, Raymond I. [ Deed in Trust– R94098643] Spangler, Raymond I. Spangler, Dale R. Spangler, Dale R. Spangler, Roy W./David M Spangler, Roy W./David M. Spangler Realty Trust 7/19/1924 Stopp, Bert/Frank [QCD – 562-503] Stopp, Grace Brunson, Rose/Gay Stopp, Gerald/Catherine Heirs of George Stopp 1/07/1871 Spivy, Daniel/Rebecca [SMtg – 117-273] $250 Ashley, James R. Begin 66’ south of SE corner of Lot 2 Block 3 of Shreffler’s Addition, thence South 132’, West 80’, North 132’, East 80’ – released 4/19/1879 1/21/1870 Spivy, Daniel/Rebecca [SMtg – 113-319] $270 Corbin, Oliver J. Begin 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 in Shreffler’s Addition, thence run South 132’, West 80’, North 132’ & East 80’ to POB in NE ¼ of Sec. 16 – release 106-331 1/27/1865 Aoderly, Nicholas,[Deed -95-603] $325 Spivy, Rebecca Begin 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 in Shreffler’s Addition, thence run iSouth 132’, West 80’, North 132’ & East 80’ to place of beginning in NE ¼ of Sec. 16 8/06/1858 Shreffler, John D./Sarah [Deed – 92-489] $100 Aoderly, Nicholas Begin 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 in Shreffler’s Addition, thence run South 132’, West 80’, North 132’ & East 80’ to place of beginning in NE ¼ of Sec. 16 6/24/1856 Summerville, John [Deed – 48-38] $90 Shreffler, John D. Begin 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 in Shreffler’s Addition, thence run South 132’, West 80’, North 132’ & East 80’ to place of beginning in NE ¼ of Sec. 16

19

12/25/1855 Summerville, Thomas [Deed – 46-131] $80 Summerville, John Burlew, John Beginning 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 in Shreffler’s Addition, thence run South 132’, West 80’, North 132’ & East 80’ to place of beginning in NE ¼ of Sec. 16 9/13/1854 Shreffler, John D/Sarah [Deed – 43-51] $100 Summerville, Thomas Burlew. John 66’ South of SE corner of Lot 2 in Block 3 – South 132’, West 160’, North 132’, East 160’ 2/20/1847 Shreffler, John D/Sarah [MTG – M- 204-5] $302 York, Thomas J. To be paid in 3 equal payments – 1st payment to be made 3/1/1851 & interest therein, 2nd payment to be made 3/1/1852 & interest therein, 3rd payment to be made 3/1/1853 & interest from the 1st day of March next – beginning at a stone planted on the East line of Sec. 16 in Twp. 36 N Range 9 E, 25.59 chains North of the East quarter corner of Sec. 16 thence West 7.86 chains, thence North 91 links to corner, thence West 16.88 chains, thence South 3.47 chains, thence West 11.35 chains to the center of the DuPage River inaccessible, thence South 28 ½ degrees West 10.65 chains , thence South 13½ degrees West 7 chains, thence South 5.85 chains to corner, inaccessible in the center of the DuPage River, thence East on the division line of Sec. 16 previously established by J. Woolley 33.11 chains, thence North 5 chains to corner, thence East 2 chains, thence North 5 chains , thence East 8 chains to corner on Section line, thence on section line North 15.59 chains to place of beginning, containing 90.81 Acres. Also Lots 14 & 15 in Block 13. 2/20/1847 York, Thomas J./Melissa [WD – M-268] $1,200 Shreffler, John D. Beginning at a stone planted on the East line of Sec. 16 in Twp. 36 N Range 9 E, 25.59 chains North of the East quarter corner of Sec. 16, thence West 7.86 chains, thence North 91 links to corner, thence West 16.88 chains, thence South 3.47 chains , thence West 11.35 chains to the center of the DuPage River inaccessible, thence South 28 ½ degrees West 10.65 chains, thence South 13½ degrees West 7 chains, thence South 5.85 chains to corner, inaccessible in the center of the DuPage River, thence East on the division line of Sec. 16 previously established by J. Woolley 33.11 chains, thence North 5 chains to corner, thence East 2 chains, thence North 5 chains, thence East 8 chains to corner on Section line, thence on section line North 15.59 chains to place of beginning, containing 90.81 Acres. Also Lots 14 & 15 in Block 13 4/15/1843 Ingersoll, Chester/Phebe [Deed – H-59-60] $100 York, Thomas J. One certain piece of land lying & being part of the E ½ of NE ¼ of Sec. 16 – commencing in the SW corner of Lot 19 in Block 13 of the Town of Plainfield, thence East on the line the line of the lots to the land sold to Frederick Tuttle until it strikes the road in the same line of Tuttle thence South on the line of the road to Ebenezer Williams land, thence West to Williams corner, thence South to Lorin Burdick’s land, thence West to the land of Thomas York as described in a deed of survey, thence North to place of beginning, containing 19 acres with the encumbrance of a life lease given to Josiah Ingersoll. 4/01/1843 Ingersoll, Chester/Phebe [Deed – H-58-9] $315.50 York, Thomas J. Commencing from the center of Section 16 from thence East 28.65 chains, thence at right angles North 22.78 chains, thence West 28.65 chains, thence South to place of beginning, containing 66 Acres & 87 rods including 2 former deeds given of parts of the same land; Also one other piece commencing on the SE corner of Philo N. Peck’s land, thence North to the SW corner of Lot 8 in Block 13 of the Town of Plainfield as recorded, thence East to the SE corner of Lot 18 in Block 13, thence South to the land above described, containing 3 Acres & 20 rods. Also Lots 12 & 13 in Block 13

20

2/19/1842 Ingersoll, Chester/Phebe [Deed – G-326] $150 York, Thomas J. Land lying in Twp. 36 N Range 9 E being part of the NE ¼ of Sec. 16 and lying East of a certain piece formerly deeded by me to Thomas J. York and of the same length north & south to extend east to make it 10 A. 2/08/1841 Ingersoll, Chester/Phebe [Deed – F-528] $700 York, Thomas J. Beginning at the SW corner of the NE ¼ of Sec. 16 in Twp. 36 N Range 9 E, thence North on the West line of said lot to Juliet Street or on a line of the state road from Ottawa to Chicago thence East on said road or street so that an equal distance from the place of beginning East on the South line of said lot to make it contain 40 A. 12/03/1833 Ingersoll, Chester [Mtg – 1-24] $1,000 Blanchard, Francis G. W ½ of NE ¼ & E ½ of NE ¼ of Sec. 16, containing 160 Acres 10/21/1833 U.S. Land Office [Land Patent] $200 Ingersoll, Chester W ½ of NE ¼ & E ½ of NE ¼ of Sec. 16, containing 160 Acres

21

22

Plainfield’s Pre-Civil War Properties Listed below are those 73 properties identified by the 2006 ArchiSearch Survey that were built prior to the Civil War; there are also several properties that were identified by ArchiSearch as c.1865 and they as well have been placed in this list. Also attached is a map that was discovered during research that shows the location of all properties in Plainfield in 1862: Pre-Civil War Village Landmark Properties: (5) 23839 (222) W. Main St. – 1845 – 4 over 4 – Greek Revival - Dennison Green’s Residence 23842 (223) W. Main St. – 1852 – Greek Revival & Gothic Revival - J. Hagar’s Residence 24038 (503) W. Main St. – 1844 – Greek Revival influence - Plainfield House 24010 (405) W. Commercial – 1835 – Upright & Wing - Chester Ingersoll Residence 24012 (409) W. Commercial – 1837 – Gable front Greek Revival - York-Ingersoll House (Pioneer House) Pre- Civil War Landmark Nominations being written: (6) 15124 (506) S. Division – 1860 – Side Hall Plan w/Greek Revival Influences 23718 (33) W. Lockport – 1834 - part is pre-Civil War – NE corner of Eastern & Lockport 24022 (409) W. Lockport – 1850-1 -Greek Revival - Congregational Church 24104 (603) W. Lockport – 1847 – Gable Front Commercial - Wine & Cheese 15134 (506) S. Fox River – 1840 – Upright & Wing 24126 (611) W. Chicago – 1855 – Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival & Italianate influences Pre-Civil War Properties Recommended by ArchiSearch to become Landmarks: (19) 24120-22 (621) W. Lockport – 1850 – Side Hall Plan/Upright & Wing – Vanolinda’s Residence 23833 (210) W. Lockport – 1855 – Gabled Ell w/ Greek Revival influence 24044 (507) W. Main St. – 1840-1; Four over Four w/Greek Revival Influences - Jason Flander’s House 23828 (1115) W. Mill St. – 1836-7 Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival - James Mather’s Residence 14805 (901) S. Eastern Avenue – 1858 - Gothic Revival w/Greek Revival influence 15123 (511) S. DesPlaines – 1855 -Side Hall Plan w/Greek Revival & Italianate influences 15226 (400) S. DesPlaines – 1855 – Upright & Wing 15208 (410) S. DesPlaines – 1845 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival influences 15018 (712) S. Division – 1850 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Influences 15136 (500) S. Dillman – 1855 -Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival Influences -James/Sophia Wraith’s house 24220 (711) W. Ottawa – 1838 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Influences 24033 (510) W. Ottawa – 1835 – 1845 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival Influences 24013 (408) W. Commercial – 1845 – Greek Revival/Gabled Ell 24127 (610) W. Commercial – 1845 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival Influences 24030 (505) W. Commercial – 1855 – Upright & Wing 24036 (507) W. Commercial – 1860 – Upright & Wing w/Italianate influences 24040 (511) W. Commercial – 1845 – Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival Influences 24120/22 (609) W. Chicago – 1845 - Gabled Ell - Must remove synthetic siding – possible Demo by owner 15916 S. Rt. 59 – 1830 - 1st section built; Hess bought house in 1850s – SW corner of Renwick & Division

23

Pre-Civil War Properties: (43) 15118 (510) S. Division – 1864 – Greek Revival & Italianate influences 15009 (719) S. Division – 1850 – Greek Revival influence – located in East Side HD & BTD 15117 (507) S. Division – 1845 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival influence 15201 (407) S. Division – 1852 – I-House, Pre-Classic w/Italianate porch 23724 (101) W. Lockport – 1845 – T-Plan - a part is pre-Civil War – NW corner Eastern & Lockport - Bartlett’s H. 23727 (102) W. Lockport - 1855 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival influence 23808 (111) W. Lockport - 1860 - Upright & Wing 23829 (208) W. Lockport – 1850 – Side Hall Plan/Upright & Wing 23913 (216) W. Lockport – 1855 – Altered Greek Revival - Sharon German Evangelical Church 24136 (701) W. Lockport – 1850 – Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival Influences 23820 (203) W. Main St. – 1860 - Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival Influences 24029 (500) W. Main St. – 1860 - I-House 24031 (502) W. Main St. – 1860 (513) W. Main St. - 1860 – Hall & Parlor 24201 (618) W. Main St. – 1851 – I-House/Pre-Classic 24230 (711) W. Main St. – altered/remodeled 23812 (1103) W. Mill St. – 1865 – I-House w/Gothic Revival influence 14931 (807) S. Illinois – 1865 – Upright & Wing (Arnold’s Addition) 15135 (501) S. Illinois – 1865 – Side Hall Plan – Italianate influence 15206 (408) S. Illinois – 1865 – I-House Altered 14821 (819) S. Bartlett – 1845 – Greek Revival – SE corner Bartlett & Main 23813 (206) W. Evans – 1840-45 – I-House w/ Greek Revival 15112 (604) S. Fox River – 1856 - Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival influence 15106 (606) S. Fox River –1851 - moved 1881/1882 – recently remodeled 15118 (600) S. Fox River – 1860 – Gothic Revival influence 15220 (404) S. Fox River 15116 (604) S. DesPlaines – 1845 – Barn Type West side – 1st Bldg. south of Alley 15119 (601) S. DesPlaines – 1847 – Side Hall Plan - Arris Architects 15118 (600) S. Dillman – 1860 - Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival influence 15202 (406) S. Dillman – 1850 - SW corner of Dillman & Ottawa 15206 (404) S. Dillman – 1860 –Upright & Wing 24037 (506) W. Chicago – 1864 – I-House (304) W. Chicago – 1864 - Gable Front w/Greek Revival & Italianate influence 23907 (222) W. Ottawa – 1860 - Upright & Wing 24120-22 (621) W. Lockport – 1850 – Side Hall Plan/Upright & Wing – Vanolinda’s Residence 23833 (210) W. Lockport – 1855 – Gabled 24007 (402) W. Commercial – 1860 – I-House altered 24115 (604) W. Commercial – 1860 - PENDING DEMOLITION APPLICATION 24124 (607) W. Commercial – 1849 – Upright & Wing – totally altered 24130 (611) W. Commercial – 1860 – Hall & Parlor (216) S. Joliet Rd – 1865 - Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival Influences 15319 (213) S. Joliet Rd. – 1855 - Gable Front w/Greek Revival - Elihu Corbin’s Residence 15330 (204) S. Joliet Rd. – 1855 - Upright & Wing w/Greek Revival influence Pre-Civil War Properties Demolished since 2006: (5) 14927 (803) S. Division – 1848 - East side of Division – Carey House Demolished 15307 (221) S. Division – 1855 – Upright & Wing – Demolished 15417 (103) S. Division – 1855 - badly damaged by fire & subsequently Demolished 24025 (502) W. Ottawa – 1836 – Hall & Parlor - Demolished 2014

24

Pre-Civil War Properties to be added to the Preservation Watch List: 15002 (722) S. Division – 1855 -Gabled Ell w/Greek Revival Influences (West side of Division) 15018 (712) S. Division – 1850 – Upright & Wing w/Greek Influences 15022 (708) S. Division – 1855 – Gable Front w/Greek Revival influences – Library owned – possible Demo 24030 (505) W. Commercial – 1855 – Upright & Wing +

25