hunter harvest survey, 1978-79 - connecting … · job completion report surveys and investigations...
TRANSCRIPT
ILLINO SUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
PRODUCTION NOTE
University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign Library
Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.
( e3, c o9Ti 3
I 01-I•'r7•
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS PROJECTS
as required by
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act
Illinois
Federal Aid Project No. W-49-R-26)Study II: Wildlife Harvests
Job No. 1: Hunter Harvest Survey, 1978-79
by
Jack A. Ellis
David Kenney, Director
Illinois Department of Conservation
M. M. SweetFederal Aid Coordinator
T. B. Miller,Supervisor
Div. of Wildlife Resources
November 1, 1979
JOB COMPLETION REPORT
SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS PROJECT
STATE OF ILLINOIS
PROJECT NO.: W-49-R(26) STUDY II JOB NO. I
OBJECTIVE: To determine the annual harvest of small game
in Illinois and relate this paramter to popula-
tion trends and characteristics, habitat con-
ditions, and other factors which may influence
hunter harvest, and develop annual statewide
hunting regulations.
PROCEDURES: Methods used for the hunter harvest survey
for the 1978-79 hunting season were described
by G.F.Hubert, Jr. (Job Completion Report,
Proj. W-49-R(24),, Job No. 1, Hunter Mail Survey,
(1976-77, 32 pp., 1977).
The questionnaire card for the 1978-79 hunter
harvest survey (Fig. 1) was similar to those
used in previous years. The lead questions
requested information on age, years of hunting
experience and if they hunted deer with a bow
and arrow.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
The estimates for the 1978-79 season were based
on the sale of 390,000 resident hunting licenses. The 1977-78
season estimates were based on the sale of 425,000 resident
hunting licenses.
The 1978-79 hunting seasons and bag limits for
the species surveyed (Table 1) were similar to 1977-78 seasons.
Water fowl hunters enjoyed a more liberal season in 1978 than
in 1977.
From a sample of 6,400 licensed resident hunters,
6,000 were mailed harvest survey cards. The U. S. Postal
Service returned 113 (2.88 percent) as undeliverable. A
total of 3,887 replies were received (64.78 percent) Of
these 3,832 (63.86 percent) were useable. This response
rate was higher than in 1977. The responses indicated that
14.69 percent of the sample did not hunt the species listed
during the 1978 season. In 1977, 12.96 percent of those
sampled did not hunt.
The returns indicated that 13.75 percent hunted
deer with bow and arrow during the 1978 archery deer season
or 53,635 bow hunters. The Permit Office issued 31,483
archery permits during 1978.
A summary of hunting effort and harvest for
1978-79 for the various game species for which information
was solicited is presented in Tables 2 and 3. Similar
information for the previous four seasons are presented
in Table 4. Hunting effort and success by species for
the various wildlife management units are presented in
Tables 5-20. Comparison of harvests by wildlife manage-
ment unit for the seasons in 1977 and 1978 is presented
in Table 23.
Average age of 3,753 respondents was 35.35
years (Table 21). The 21-25 years category comprised the
largest segment of the respondents. In terms of hunting
experience, 3,768 respondents had hunted an average of
20.28 years (Table 22),
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that this annual survey of
resident hunters be continued to provide annual indices
of hunting activities and success. Some method should be
developed to obtain similar information from those that
are exempt from purchasing a resident hunting license.
A more random method of selecting hunters to include in
the survey should be developed.,
-4-
DATA AND REPORTS:
The data from which this report was
compiled are on file in the Department of Conservation
Office, 129 North Kennedy Boulevard, Vandalia, IL 62471.
PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY:
Jack A. EllisSurveys and InvestigationsDivision of Wildlife Resources
Thixton B. Miller,ChiefDivision of Wildlife
Resources
Table 1. Illinois' regulations for migratory and small game, 1977-78.
SEASON LIMITSPECIES ZONE DURATION DAILY POSSESSION
Rabbit
Squirrels
Bobwhite
Ring-neckedPheasant
Mourning Dove
Woodcock
Gray Partridge
Woodchuck
Ducks
Geese
Raccoon
Fox
Coyote
Statewide
Northern
Southern
Statewide
Statewide
Statewide
Statewide
Statewide
Statewide
Northern
Southern
Statewide
Northern
Southern
Statewide
Statewide
Nov. 11
Aug. 1
Sept. 1
Nov. 11
Nov. 11
Sept. 1
Oct. 15
Nov. 11
June 1
Oct. 19
Nov. 2
Oct. 19
Nov. 15
Nov. 25
Nov. 30
Sept. 1
- Jan.
- Nov.
- Nov.
- Jan.
- Jan.
- Nov.
- Dec.
- Jan.
- Mar.
- Dec.
- Dec.
- Dec.
- Jan.
- Jan.
- Jan.
- Feb.
4
5
5
8
2
15
15
15
15
15
9
18
15
31
7
21
27
19
26
31
28
8
10
10
16
4
12 24
5 10
2 4
None None
Point System
Varied by species
None None
None
None
None
None
qr r ' C) N ro L 0 m r N r 00 LC n CAmv) L a0i I 1 0 ' r- C O N C 00 m r-H
S O 0 0 00 o r o0 CN 00 O0 C 40%b ob « % %b. f. » b. ft k % % % .
Q C CN m % D N oo Ln r-H rý N r H cNCY) N 0o 0 O Ln 00 r- H N LA n Cm 0 oo00 D O N r -4 LA HNn rq
roCO
II
Z%t.V
Z0
U)
0E-
en1
r5
0
>t
o4
1-1
CO
Q)4J r-4 4(H0 (a
cn cd
r e
U in 'd
ý4 (d
H 0a *d4)
> ra
(0
MO MW
0)>4 H0 en
Q) ( dP
4-) En
0 U3
Ci)OU
(1) 0 co4J por) 0 (
H A
U)
rqr-l
N*
a'
or
0CA0H
C)
rN
ClLn
Ln
00
00
00CoCN
S0 H 0 0 04 OH m ) 4- O> 0 0
d X r0 m 0 04 0 0 0 ( T )S r4 0 M 0 Q 0 9 : R PC 0
LA N 0 t0Mn CL C Co
Sn A 0 00
'0 N 0 oCM in V r*
OD (Y r-4
r-I
Co Cn Ho cn
r4l C)C o o o
0
Cio
a
r-4
Co
0r
LN
00
r-
Ln
Co
m
'lh
aHr
0
rl-r-4
Co
NiN-
r-I rOH *'
00 inCo LA
CN c
r-
' cn
o N
00 Il
ra rdDD CM
N 0
o H
m D
C)N*' N
C) CMH- H-
,-I ,. , ,--I O' OO O'
Co - 0 m
o N a a N C
00 r' C0 a 00o q
LA LO 0 N NLA 0) q C00 r-I q
C)
Ln'0
'0
VD0
mC
o
CD
CN
0*Ln
r-
ClrH
0 r- t
Hr 0 0 0
o0 Co Co '0 Cof * * 0 5 0 0
N 00 C 0 C 10N rH H r H
v H H '0 N N
on D O O r*, Cm CM r-a0 '0 '0 m n CN %Co H N N %- LA
oo in
o H
00 00
LA (D
0 r0
o Ao '00O m 1 qt
r- CM
H N U)
X: U)
>1 0 'Hrd > r> 0 *7
00
N
ro
NI
TABLE 3. ESTIMATED NUMBER OF RESIDENT HUNTERS, AVERAGE SEASON BAG,AND TOTAL HARVEST BY SPECIES IN ILLINOIS, 1978-79
(N-3832)ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATEDNUMBER OF AVERAGE TOTAL
SPECIES HUNTERS SEASON BAG HARVEST
Rabbit
Fox Squirrel
Gray Squirrel
Bobwhite
Pheasant
Gray Partridge
Dove
Woodcock
Woodchuck
Ducks
Geese
Raccoon
Red Fox (Gun)
Gray Fox (Gun
Coyote (Gun)
Canid Chasers
228,891 +
160,905 +
102,690 +
107,474 +
146,250 +
7,938 +
89,154 +
16,691 +
26,461 +
73,176 +
42,032 +
52,414 +
27,072 +
11,500 +
25,851 +
3,664 +
6,204
6,203
5,515
5,631
6,100
1,779
5,290
2,550
3,169
4,919
3,907
4,298
3,202
2,132
3,135
1,216
5.53
9.38
7.69
6.24
2.63
1.68
15.55
2.06
8.19
11.70
2.51
8.47
1.14
0.68
1.45
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
0.38
0.60
0.70
0.90
0.22
0.44
1.54
0.31
2.68
1.25
0.45
1.06
0.25
0.30
0.44
a 1,266,483 + 94,880
1,508,698 +120,081
789,722 + 85,228
671,099 +104,635
384,506 + 94,885
9,262 + 2,116
1,386,575 + 82,443
34,400 + 5,217
216,780 + 12,601
855,821 + 57,650
105,339 + 9,828
444,040 + 36,502
30,939 + 455
7,836 + 1,475
37,452 + 733
a 95 percent confidence interval
CI)
COen
Coo0n
rd>1
0
-H0
ro,-I
4-H
-H
U)a)-140
4-4rl
a)
rd
Cd
-M
tU
5,
C3
0-1H
HO
CU)
0E OE
0 z>W
0r
E-'rz1enl
Q
CP
E-4
rz'
<g
r-4
S r- I r
0FT4
0o 00 C r
Ho o o o\eM in lo oI
mD o a\ en
m op n ,r-ir-- r-, ON
00 in L qr m
00 ON O o
NI '0 0Oaw ~as
m 00 N 00N o aN •
a% %. S% S.
w C0 00 N
H- r-i CH
oo Ai o i
CMI e(n (MNI
CP I I O
rd rH r H r
u3
r,4- r '-t .n 00 in 00
CO O0 LAV) C,0 r*,% r0
Lo CO 00 0
kO CO NR 00o r o
% N ON 00
r-1 r-I r-I r-I
CO rCi 0 C
HHHH r v
conLO)
00 CM00 NDNc 41
cN ()N C OCM co (Y ) e00 r- in Or
00co CO m00o co ON r(00 r c oo 00
H0 00 kH .r
Nt 0 0 ON*D oo00 r
a o C
r-- o O r-,O
N;0 N 0
- Ln k t- a)
Sr- o-- r*- CmH r rNC ao
SN N N
0000
ro m
r a inV
O0 ON
0
00 a\I I-Ioo
't* r-iI
Hr 00
o 00
r-I
I:: I I I( LA ,.0 r-- Cocn r- r- rl- r
) r r- 4
P4
%O. r-I CN 0I
M LO LO in
o O L a
S0 r r-
H N ONI N
cM om o r00
0O 0 qlT
oN to r %
en en CM) C
r- rH r-4 r-
I I I Ia4 in %o r- 00
r.-. r.-. r-- r D
(d H-1 r - r-
0
Ln Cr) r'-- ONm 00 o*0 chC'ro o rI c
V* rq 00 00r-, C4 r-1 00
r- rH r -
,o r- m oL() W N)
Hin LO D D
in t r oIarv oom o
0o VD o in
0 0 0 in 0ko m u% q
qqw Ct) qqr fOrm C in o
rC r) CM CM
00 CM 00 qqin in mn dl
40 00 O %.0CM 01 %r ^>
4J-NN r- --
NHcHm(U
CNLA
,-Or0
t" CD
in in o o
00 r- CM n
r com inko) 00 ooN
00 r(n CN
,r--
v'0 1O H
C- <, r-I 4 -4
^14 a0 in LC
'0 C) 0 NC
rQ (n co wNo .0 oo
H H
S0o r 0 a
S r-v .r- r--
0000
-H
4J.NCO~-4 No N^ N N
E-1zH0
10 r-- 00 m
4J in % r-- OD
Q r-r rt r- ras me
ýM
HE-D.1
E-40E-1
U) U)H ZHaO0
Cl 0
' LO iLn-I r*- C
Or-i r-0- r-0 0
HHO(--L
to
kD'0
in•0ooCN
00
*Y)
oI
rO
r-i
CO
M
0
0)
0)4-4
O
-p
cn
0
r1
H
Q)
-H
CO
U)
41rd
0NCM
r-1
aN r-i inr-i ar in
* 6 00 %o inC r-I r-I
('n oo oo O
m) 00 00 Ctl
r-oI 0 C 00
o r,-- oo N-I I - I
UH H• H H' c0 r- - -0•
rt oo 0 0 qSO•N rCl o
M Ln CN 00
t0 O 0n CmN0 Ln r, oo
H
PrZH
E-vi
3
UnQ>4
E-4 QI ic:E-1 E-1(/) E0
0 0SE-1
HE-4HE(en
N Ln 00 CM
NrO) CO Lu0• r,- CM iO
t. .0 00 LO
M ot ( nH
r--4 -i r -4
.. .. 0
0 0 k .0
or i 0
n fn Ln 0orr *-i CD
0 00
q:4 cn NV mY*
0) r- CM o
N Co CN C0
%. in eM qc
0000
04o 00No CO
UO I rI r
0O3
a )
0
r
00*
0
o
,--4
CO
LO '£ 00 r-Hmw n oo
0 0
H
Lo Ln C OH
rl Ln )o r
ý0 N0,' VAa r4n oIo CN a
00 0 C00 CM
*n i* * oo
o in 4 in.0 r* 0 o0
in o 0, 0n
'0 CN CO ON N N *
I Ioo cr
r- c-Hr-4 r-4
m r-H oI LOCMO CN mOco 00 LO CN
r0 rV oO rHONC 04 00 Cr-w CH r m
mONHM'
N-) 00 0 0
! - r-q
0 0\ 0' 1
n0 m (w m
M m m m* * * *00000 C
,- LO M N O
Sm oo q0C00 00 n Lc)
OAmIaDmm% %
C Il i IO Ln 0 oN C0 o^ r - o'
om
ko rl \o ovCO 0 r0 Cjt
N Coo m0C
,M --- ,--0000 'aNaO C)
H H
aO\ o) Cla oco o- rl- In oD
LO 0 LC 'm om n MC4
4O 000
W.o 00 o r
D n r. 00
.* * * *-
%a *a> %b bin 00 %D C4
<m qr oo onNr r r
3 IS00U r0 r-OH0ýiS
SIILfl'0
U) 0' a'0I)HHci)03
Z
0
H
4
I I I IIIIILn t r- 00a") ON N
>Q
()r-.JQf0E-1
OH CN IH
*0 00 q
.o oo rI0 r-I r0
0\ 0, rl
OO0 00N Cm
<yt c qwON rJ rq
000N oN rN
0 o
mHrHooa* **r r
X I I I0 ~ r- 00
r. r- r- r--'c, -
0)
Q
HH
W
0- C-H-Zgg
Un U)y ZHQOUZm
U4En Cf
cN
oo
00oo
H
Cd
-4
>1
4-4
Q)
0
ro()
4-)aO
cd
Cd
a)rlPH
Q)
41
OU
U
*-H
en
aH
HE-
EA(1)
Q
HA
Q
,
r4
HrQ
ft13
H
U)rz
0
c0
N
0 00
00 CMwON
Hvoro oo
* * *
Loof r0wLflC
C...
UI)
C4 ) Ln a%
m qw m
oom o
ON LOn t.
0r-00
0oo
Co r-I o
Sr- o o
000 1%r, C0, o
00 0 r-I
0000
p 0 ( 00rC rO rD
ON Nin ýD 1
0, 0 0)
Har
O I I
r-i m qw
00O 0 Do
•o o o o
USH r- r-i
QE-1
H0
04
00 00 NMOO CO O
cn o C)
r-4 r4-4 r4
0) t. 00Sr-4
eC
000
r- 00 c0)
III
4J r- r- rN0 aO a) o
0U
U)
cdHd
0 zW
0 >4
9c;
Q
H 0 E-E-4 E-4 Z
OZU)U auz mw f::4P4 CU) ;
r-1 00N- 00
HN CMrt CM
rHin
CO
Table 5. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife management units inIllinois 1978-79 for the species listed below. The sample size is inparenthesis.
Cottontails (N = 2,249)
WildlifeManagement
Unit
Northwest Hills
Northeast Moraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
Western Prairie/Forest
Central SandPrairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
Estimatednumber ofhunters
19,948
14,961
16,284
28,192
19,744
6,819
68,392
35,214
9,770
4,376
5,190
Percent ofhuntingpressure
8.36
6.52
6.86
10.28
7.78
2.80
31.08
17.98
4.80
2.04
1.46
Averagedailybag
0.61
0.57
1.44
1.45
1.18
0.76
0.57
i1.00
1.22
1.32
0.86
Averageseasonbag
3.60
3.50
8.48
7.39
6.49
4.37
3.63
7.15
8.41
8.65
3.35
Estimatedtotal
harvest
71,853
52,414
138,108
208,332
128,236
29,820
248,534
251,790
82,132
37,860
17,403
Estimatedtotal daysafield
117,041
91,292
96,075
143,909
108,899
39,285
434,984
251,587
67,273
28,599
20,253
TABLE 6. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildife management unitsin Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below. The samplesize is in parenthesis.
Fox Squirrel (N = 1,581)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Unit Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
11, 195
5,292
14,757
24,120
15,470
6,615
39,387
27,784
8,549
4,478
3,257
6.95
3.28
9.17
14.99
9.61
4.11
24.47
17.26
5.31
2.78
2.02
1.15
1.08
1.66
6.26
5.65
8.61
1.36 12.84
1.37 9.95
1.64 11.41
1.24
1.17
1.33
0.83
1.16
8.00
9.79
10.54
9.16
7.38
70,122
29,922
127,014
309,800
153,882
75,516
315,296
272,042
90,070
41,015
24,020
61,166
27,581
76,432
228,381
111,952
46,104
253,361
231,740
67,476
49,564
20,762
TABLE 7. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife management unitsin Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below. The samplesize is in parenthesis.
Gray Squirrel (N = 1,009)
... Average
WildlifeManagement
Units
Northwest Hills
EstimatedNumber ofHunters
7,226
Percent ofHuntingPressure
7.10
AverageDaily
Bag
0.63
AverageSeasonBag
3.79
EstimatedTotal
Harvest
27,376
EstimatedTotal days
Afield
43,152
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
Central SandPrairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
4,681
4,783
18,726
5,292
2,137
17,810
26,461
6,310
5,699
2,544
4.60
4.70
18.14
5.20
2.10
17.51
26.02
6.20
5.60
2.50
0.88
0.88
5.33
5.67
1.06 10.86
0.54
0.62
0.61
1.01
0.98
1.66
1.02
3.96
5.38
3.96
8.81
8.64
16.20
7.16
24,933
32,871
203,333
20,964
11,500
70,627
233,049
54,548
92,304
18,216
28,395
37,351
191,539
38,878
18,421
116,124
230,722
55,670
55,670
17,810
~
TABLE 8. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Bobwhites (N = 1,056)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
7,328
1,425
11,908
14,757
10,076
4,376
25,240
21,271
5,699
3,562
1,832
6.81
1.32
11.07
13.73
9.37
4.,07
23.48
19.79
5.30
3.31
1.70
0.51
0.52
1.52
1.45
1.08
1.12
0.52
1.48
1.17
1.21
1.36
3.46
2.21
8.44
7.63
5.01
6.67
3.16
9.10
7.11
7.83
5.61
25,515
3,177
101,141
113,335
50,827
29,410
80,441
195,007
40,784
28,078
10,350
49,462
6,106
65,950
77,654
46,918
26,156
153,680
131,188
34,705
23,103
7,531
Table 9. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife management unitsin Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below. The samplesize is in parenthesis.
Pheasants (N = 1,437)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
Northeast Moraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
Central SandPrairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
20,456
23,510
3,155
305
4,071
6,615
78,486
3,358
814
102
8,956
13.56
15.58
2.09
0.20
2.69
4.38
52.69
2.22
0.53
0.06
5.93
0.47
0.53
0.34
0.12
0.50
0.47
0.40
0.50
0.02
2.50
0.45
3.18
3.32
2.26
0.67
1.95
2.74
2.43
1.82
0.12
5.00
0.94
65,034
77,960
7,124
204
7,938
18,116
192,965
6,106
102
509
8,447
138,413
146,148
20,864
1,628
15,877
38,776
486,177
12,213
3,969
204
18,726
Table 10. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Hungarian partridge (N = 78)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
Northeast Moraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
Central SandPrairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
3,053
2,137
102
2,341
38.46
26.92
1.28
29.49
0.14
0.25
0.25
0.06
1.33
1.52
3.00
0.43
4,071
3,257
305
1,018
29,513
13,230
1,221
17,199
305 3.84 0.32 2.00Unknown 611 1,934
Table 11. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Mourning dove CN = 876)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Unit Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
Northeast Moraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
5,400
7,132
6,317
12,941
6,419
4,279
24,352
14,876
4,177
2,038
1,324
6.05
7.99
7.08
14.50
7.19
4.79
27.28
16.67
4.68
2.28
1.48
2.54
2.75
3,26
3.54
3.02
3.49
2.25
3.42
3.53
3.96
2.43
12.19
15.14
15.63
19.30
14.95
15.21
10.19
18.14
25.17
34.70
8.23
65,746
107,881
98,619
249,449
95,872
65,034
247,821
269,600
105,031
70,631
10,890
25,850
39,183
30,277
70,529
31,753
18,625
109,916
78,773
29,718
17,810
4,478
TABLE 12. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Woodcock (N = 164)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
305
1,221
509
1,934
509
407
5,699
3,460
1,628
814
1.83
7.32
3.05
11.59
3.05
2.44
34.14
20.73
9.75
4.88
0.27
0.50
0.08
0.49
1.00
0.63
0.38
0.44
0.76
0.61
1.33
2.08
1.60
2.05
5.00
1.75
1.88
2.44
2.25
2.38
407
2,544
814
3,969
1,018
712
10,686
8,447
3,664
1,934
1,527
5,089
10,483
8,040
1,018
1,120
28,293
19,334
4,783
3,155
1.22 1.00 1.00Unknown 204 204 204
Table 13. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Woodchuck (N = 260)
WildlifeManagement
Unit
Northwest Hills
Northeast Moraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
EstimatedNumber ofHunters
204
611
1,425
6,513
916
407
5,190
6,920
2,544
1,425
305
Percent ofHuntingPressure
0.77
2.31
5.38
24.61
3.46
1.54
19.61
26,15
9.61
5.38
1.15
AverageDailyBag
0.40
0.58
0.93
1.00
AverageSeasonBag
1.00
3.00
2.86
9.81
1.07 10.22
0.59
0.56
0.85
1.34
2.08
1.05
4.75
3.96
6.66
6.89
8.42
7.00
EstimatedTotal
Harvest
204
1,832
4,071
63,914
9,363
1,934
20,558
46,104
34,705
31,957
2,137
EstimatedTotal daysAfield
509
3,155
4,376
64,219
8,752
3,257
36,740
54,448
25,850
15,368
2,035
0-
TABLE 14. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Ducks (N = 719)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
6,310
6,921
8,651
11,602
3,969
4,580
17,912
7,531
916
2,442
8.62
9.46
11.82
15.86
5.42
6.26
24.48
10.,29
1.25
3.34
1.19
1.02
0.91
1.40
0.94
1.57
1.02
1.20
0.92
1.18
11.47
6.20
12.80
18.88
6.95
14.49
9.86
12.32
6.89
8.42
72,362
42,949
110,730
219,120
27,581
66,357
176,680
92,818
6,310
20,558
60,759
42,236
121,112
156,020
29,209
42,236
173,322
77,247
6,819
17,403
3.20 1.06 8.70 20,355 19,235Unknown 2,341
TABLE 15. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Geese (N = 413)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
2,341
2,035
1,730
4,173
814
1,018
5,394
10,890
611
11,398
5.57
4..84
4.12
9.93
1.94
2..42
12.84
25.92
1.45
27.13
0.09
0.03
0.35
0.18
0.26
0.10
0.43
0.23
0.76
1.52
0.60
0.47
3.00
2.00
2.30
0.74
3.56
2.00
3.20
3,562
1,221
814
12,518
1,628
2,341
3,969
38,777
1,221
36,538
32,160
13,536
27,784
35,620
9,159
8,854
41,523
89,967
5,292
47,935
3.88 0.29 1.69 2,745 9,465Unknown 1,628
TABLE 16. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Raccoon (N = 515)
WildlifeManagement
Units
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
EstimatedNumber ofHunters
6,514
1,323
6,106
4,682
7,531
1,018
13,740
6,615
3,155
1,221
509
Percent ofHuntingPressure
12.43
2.52
11.65
8.93
14.37
1.94
26.21
12.62
6.02
2.33
0.97
AverageAverageDailyBag
1.08
0.69
1.00
0.87
0.72
0.54
0.77
0.60
0.68
0.76
0.48
AverageSeasonBag
8.17
3.85
11.30
10.41
9.03
4.40
7.23
7.49
8.06
14.67
6.40
EstimatedTotal
Harvest
53,228
5,089
69,003
48,750
67,985
4,478
99,331
49,564
25,443
17,912
3,257
EstimatedTotal DaysAfield
49,157
7,328
68,596
55,772
93,836
8,244
128,847
83,150
37,453
18,625
6,819
TABLE 17. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Red Fox (N = 266)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Days
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
3,867
1,425
2,341
1,832
2,850
1,018
9,872
2,341
814
305
407
14.28
5.26
8.65
6..77
10.53
3.76
36.46
8.65
3.01
1.13
1..50
0.18
0.24
0.11
0.08
0.11
0.34
0.14
0.21
0.24
0.27
0.67
1.16
1.78
0.78
0.56
0.86
2.40
1.18
1.04
1.38
1,00
1.50
4,478
2,544
1,832
1,018
2,442
2,442
11,704
2,442
1,120
305
611
25,036
10,788
17,098
12,824
21,576
7,226
82,132
11,399
4,580
1,120
916
TABLE 18. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Gray Fox CN = 113)
WildlifeManagement
Units
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
Unknown
EstimatedNumber ofHunters
1,323
102
407
1,832
1,018
204
4,376
1,221
712
102
204
Percent of AverageHunting DailyPressure Bag
1150 0.07
0.89
0.54
15.93
8..85
1.77
38.05
10.62
6.19
0.89
1.77
1.00
0.04
0.18
0.03
0.33
0.04
0.26
0.12
0.17
0.08
AverageSeasonBag
0.31
1.00
0.25
1.00
0.33
1.00
0.40
2.00
0.71
1.00
0.50
Estimated EstimatedTotal Total DaysHarvest Afield
407 5,597
102
102
1,832
305
102
2,748
10,380
9,159
204
1,730
2,442
509
102
102
611
47,323
9,261
4,172
611
1,323
- - 0 6 6 8 1 a.. - A
TABLE 19. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Coyote (N = 254)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatedManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Day
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
2,239
3,664
1,730
4,580
1, 425
5,699
3,867
1,934
305
8.66
14.17
6.69
17.72
5.51
22.05
14.96
7.48
1.18
0.10
0.23
0.17
0.19
0.38
0.07
0.18
0.20
0.93
0.41
2.11
1.18
1.47
2.14
0.66
1.45
1.47
13.33
916
7,735
2,035
6,717
3,053
3,766
5,597
2,850
4,071
9,567
33,891
12,111
34,502
8,040
51,702
31,347
13,943
4,376
Unknown 407 1.57 0.,22 1.75 712 3,155
TABLE 20. Summary of hunting effort and success in wildlife managementunits in Illinois in 1978-79 for the species listed below.The sample size is in parenthesis.
Canid Chasers (N = 36)
Wildlife Estimated Percent of Average Average Estimated EstimatecManagement Number of Hunting Daily Season Total Total Da•
Units Hunters Pressure Bag Bag Harvest Afield
Northwest Hills
NortheastMoraine
MississippiBorder-North
MississippiBorder-South
WesternPrairie/Forest
CentralSand Prairie
Grand Prairie
Southern Plain
Wabash Border
Shawnee Hills
204
102
204
712
204
407
1,221
407
102
1,4255..57
2.78
5.57
19.43
5.57
11.10
33.32
11.10
2.78
102
2,341
16,081
6,616
3,155
20,457
17,811
2Q4
Unknown 102 2.78 1,221
Table 21. Age distribution of resident licensedhunters from hunter harvest survey for1978-79 season.
AGE GROUP NUMBER OF HUNTERS PERCENT
4
188
426
504
499
473
391
277
294
257
217
223
3,753
0.11
5.01
11.35
13.43
13.30
12.60
10.42
7.38
7.83
6.85
5.78
5.94
100.00
AVERAGE AGE
7-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
61-65
TOTALS
35,35
Table 22. Years of hunting experience of residentlicensed hunters from hunter harvestsurvey for 1978-79 season.
YEARS OFHUNTINGEXPERIENCE
1- 5
6-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
TOTALS
NUMBER OFHUNTERS
645
589
436
496
359
339
244
241
192
175
49
3
3,768
20.28 years
PERCENT
17.12
15.63
11.57
13.16
9.53
9.00
6.48
6.40
5.10
4.64
1.30
0.08
100.01
MEAN =
--
Table 23. Percentage changes in harvests among various wildlife managementunits from 1977-79 to 1978-79 hunting season.
0) 0
0S rH , 0
HO (1 (1
4J U (- 0 E )J
Wildlife x > U >o o 4 o 4 o 0 4 oManagement Unit u r 0 ma t ,
Northeast Hills -32 -30 -18 -37 -19 -26 -2 +52 -13 +23
Northeast Moraine -49 -31 +13 -39 -24 -9 -33 +245 -66 *
Mississippi
rMississippith +13 +14 +13 +61 +42 +52 +65 +38 -31 +33
Mississippi +26 +17 +44 +19 -99 +209 +9 -74 +106 +5Border-South
WesternPrairie/Forest -29 +13 -18 +52 -76 0 +29 -13 +157 +80
Central Sand Prairie -71 +2 -71 -70 +168 -53 -30 +84 -54 *
Grand Prairie -52 -22 -26 -52 +1 -37 +23 -7 +46 -32
Southern Plain -40 -7 -17 -46 -55 -45 +25 +3 +83 +4
Wabash Border -5 +42 +8 -41 -65 -50 +73 * +71 +174
Shawnee Hills -67 -37 -2 -61 -14 -91 +26 -48 +31 +584
State -34 -3 -3 -38 -16 -17 +24 +8 +46 +52
*No harvest reported for 1977
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONSMALL GAME HUNTING SURVEY
1978-79 SEASON N 08711. Did you hunt deer in Illinois
with BOW AND ARROW dur-ing the 1978 season? ...... Yes - No I-
2. Did you hunt any of the gamelisted below in Illinois duringthe 1978-79 season? . . . . . . . Yes t No -I
3. How old are you? .........
4. How many years have youhunted? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . -- -
PLEASE FILL IN ALL THREE BLANKS FOREACH KIND OF GAME YOU HUNTED:
Numberkilled
duringseason
RABBITS .........
FOX SQUIRRELS .. .GRAY SQUIRRELS . .QUAIL...........__PHEASANT........
HUN. PARTRIDGE. . .DOVE............WOODCOCK .......
(NOT Groundhogor Woodchuck)
GROUNDHOG (orwoodchuck) .......
DUCKS............GEESE ...........RACCOON ........RED FOX .........GRAY FOX. .......COYOTE. ..........FOX or COYOTE CHASINGWITH DOGS FOR SPORTONLY AND NOT TO KILL:
County where youhunted most for
each kind of game
Numberof
dayshunted
INSTRUCTIONS
Please fill in the form on the left side of thiscard for the 1978-79 Illinois hunting season. Ifyou did not hunt any of the game listed inIllinois, check the first four questions and returnthe card.
REPORT ONLY YOUR KILL. DO NOT reportthe kill of others with whom you may havehunted.
Do NOT report game killed or days hunted onshooting areas or preserves where a fee ischarged for game taken.
Fill in the number of days on which you huntedeach kind of game listed including your unsuc-cessful days.
If you hunted for more than one kind of gameon a particular day, count it a day for EACHkind of game you hunted.
If you can't remember the exact figures, giveyour best estimate.
Fill in only the blanks that apply to you. Leaveall other blanks unmarked.
SYour comments are welcomed,but please send them in a sepa-rate letter to receive properattention.
TEAR OFF AND MAIL ANSWERS-NO POSTAGE REQUIRED
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION!!!
NO POSTAGE REQUIRED
Figure 1. Questionnaire form for hunter harvest survey of
licensed resident hunters, 1978-79 season.