illlm foundation inc · illlmfoundation inc 1250 siskiyou blvd ashland or 97520 541 552 6301...
TRANSCRIPT
Illlm Foundation Inc1250 SIskiyou Blvd Ashland OR 97520 541 552 6301
December 20 2005
Mr Gino Grimaldi City Administrator
City ofAshlandAshland OR
Dear Gino
The JPR Foundation wishes toexpress to the City in response to the City s invitation at the
Council s November 29 Study Session its interest in assuming responsibility for the Ashland
Fiber Network
As you are aware the Foundation has through its JEFFNET subsidiary been involved as a
partner in AFN s operation since the network s inception We step forward at this point because
we believe the Fiber Network is an important civic resource and because we believe our
experience in the not for profit communications world would enable us to both effectivelyoperate AFN and to do so in a fiscally responsible manner Our goals therefore are to assure
that
Ownership and control over AFN remains with anot for profit entityOwnership and control overAFN remains locally vested
The relationship ofthe participating local ISPs with AFN continues
The City achieves areliable and secure fmancial posture with respect toAFN
We wish to acknowledge and express our appreciation for the support we have received over
the past several weeks from City staff who have been prompt and generous in providing us
information necessary for us to understand of AFN s current operations in order that we could
evaluate our own capabilities for assuming responsibility for AFN That said neith rthe Citynor we have had sufficient time in which it is possible for us to formulate a fully detailed
proposal Assuming the City wishes to ontinue this discussion with us with the goal of
developing a draft agreement we would mutually work to further defme those areas which
require additional informationconsultation in order that a fully specific proposal can be crafhed
With respect to major elements ofthis expression ofintent however we advance the followingbasic components The JPR Foundation would
Assume full responsibility for the system s operation as ofamutually agreed upon date
Annually return to the City a sum currently estimated to exceed the 326 000 figurepostulated in the AFN Options Committee s spin off proforma This sum would be
Fostennf the intellectual5 creative spirit
Mr Gino Grimaldi
City ofAshland
December 20 2005
Page 2
payable for the period ofthe City s bonded indebtedness for the AFN system which we
understand to be twenty years and would constitute our payment for the exclusive rightsownerships and other consideration transferred by the City to the Foundation
Operate the Internet portion of AFN under the current open access model therebyenabling the existing ISPs on the system tocontinue their operations
I would note that this Letter of Intent is crafted for the purpose ofexpressing our intentions based
upon our current understanding ofAFN s operations Our subsequent execution ofaspecificagreement with the City would be subject to approval by the lPR Foundation Board ofDirectors
sinCe
L
Ronal amer
utive Director
EOCIII
III
CIII
lIlI
11
E III
0tl
rD0
Cl0
i0
III
nlI
03
C1
III
lI1
tl
III
lI
jV
1
om
C1
PJ
S3 o
lI
C III
1 III
1 1
tT1t
OV
l
IIIID
OTl
CJJ
Zl
l
IIIJIt
0Sl
JJ
III
a0
00
0a
c
nID
VI
C1l
0
oSlJID3
CO
CI
tIll
3C
lll
lI
nJ
0III
coT1
1J
1Z2
J0
1III
ID0
1c
VI
0J
III
8ID0ltl
l
O3l
1
6Ti
TlO
lOO
ItIII
0C
JID
E0
1D1Il
1t0
lC
oO
1o
30
0Sl
J0
0II
I0ID
Q0
ol
lI0
SIt
III
It0
VI
VI
0ID
1
mJ
00
o1
0
co
oa
1lI
1
lo O
tIC
Eo
g0
Q3 0
0o
J1 3
gID E
Ill
01 1Il
Jn
III
ItIII
lI
J IDII
I
0I
It ID VIID tI It o
lI 1 III
lI l 1 0 o 0 0 o III
lI o
fj 1Ji
NJ
0
ID0
0
Q1
0C
0
lIIO
Q10
III
1 0o
00
rD ooo
nO
cIt
lIC
III
1N
No
EID
1n
ol
1 III
0 C lI
Q III
0III
10
III
tV
I
III
C
IIIID
0 Tl0 In n
gZ
CIII
aIII
Ea
coID
0
III
Qo
5 0o
VI
Qo tI
III0 1
Itl
lID
1V
I1 S
IDIII
0ID
III
ID a0
Ito J
III
ItIII
1 s 1 III
o t III III
0 1 III
0 1 lI III
w IIII
T10itt
81
Oco
0III
01
01l
01ll0
ID3Q
oIIl
OlI
11
1
1III
rD0
0III
III
O0
1tIII
0E
c1
EE
III
1
0QQ
01Il
Em
eg
sIII
III
III
lIQ
VI
310
ItIII
III
EIII
JIII
III
lIQ
lIID
III
1III
tI3
0
III
01
Itt
oIII
III0
Ec
1III
III
III0
1
EIII
III
00
C ccOoIII0
03
lI0
31
clI
1o
0Q
tE
III
01Il
III
III
III
02lO
on
tot
3lI
III 3
1 lI1
0o
III
1III
C 0 0 o lI III
0 1 III
1 1 III
lI Q
o 0 o lI 1 lI lO III 3 I lI o E III
III
lI 1
JrnO
lI NID
1 o 1 o 1
l lO 0 IDQ
J
ol a
III
SlJ
3C
IIIl
lIn
oJ
El lO T1 Z
lI 1 1 I 1 III
0 1 III
lI 1 E III
1 o 0 lOI
0 o 0 1 1 o 0 3 1 lI III
0
N It J ID 3 ID VI
ID l Tl
o 3 C ID lO It J ID OJ
C l l
I iJIt o 0 C
OJID tI C V
IID
ItID ID o l ID l o E V
I
a
I It VI
J ID SlJ o It ID VI
ID It o It ID VI
o 3 ID It J l lO 0 It It J SlJl It V
I
iJ VI
t 11
Z EJ
su1
VI
III
III
1 III
c III
JJ
relC
1
g1
0 c III
SI
o10 I
1N
JJ
lJ1
JE
00
oC
CIII
0
lJ
o1
JJO
11
C III
J
JlC
III
1su
o1
III
C3
1Il
30 lJ
11
C1
0J
JIIl
lJ
J3
00
lJJ
J
c30
1lJ
1C
1J
0III
J1JO
1lJ
OOIll
OJ
1Il
00
01J
01
c
0lJ1Il1
CJ
0J
00
11
I1
III
III
lJC
III
XIII
1
11
III
III
lJJ
III
XJ
III
lJC
10J
010
0 o10 00
00E
11
J lC III
J o o III
1 0 o 1 lJ J 0 III
1 1 III E J 1
w
11
Z J su VI
0 n o 0 n 0 n 0 su o VIJ su 0
N IJI
EJlJ J g
VI
00
C20
30 0 o
suIII
00
0
cE J
nlC
0o
1 0
Qn J lJ
n NIII 0
11
z VI
0
35
su0
su0
1O
J 0
3C III
1O J VI
J 0
n o 3 0 su 0 o n J su E su
io
nzz
InlJ
J1
J1
1J
C1
0lJ
su0
lJ
1C
0it
11
13
J0
1III
JlJ
JC
Vc
nN1
OO
00
3rvr 0
3O
OJ1
Jlo
olc
1O
III
CC
10
III
VI
tJ
lJJ
nI
1Il
1lJtsu
JlJ
SUC
00
00
5g
13
III
E3tV
I
01c
Ji
00
J3
III0
1III
nc
13
OJ
J0
lJsu
lJO
V1J
mg
0
V1
01
001n1
lCO
J
00
00
13
00
3J
03
3cJO
0
JcJ
1Il
lJ1
J
1J
JlJmt
oO
lll O
suc
3III
3J
11
lJ0
toJ
NlJE
0J 1
IJ
N 00
0Z
1 IIIJ lJ 1 3 lJ J lC
lJlJ
rD3
10o
0
1III
J0
lCJ III
lJIII
0 10
o 0III
o
J0
E0
J JN m
J 1III Vl
J20
01 V1i
00 0
0lJ
1n
3J
o 11
J lJ J1 III
lJlJ
C J0
JC
1 oJ lC lJ
JJ
10
00
11
00
J 1 C Vl
o III
III
o J 1 III o B 1 lJ J 0 J 1 Vl
m n o
C0
00
J
IrJi
I1ll
ln
C0 o lJ 0
IJ1 0 lJ
C C SlJ
11
o C 0 0 1 o J lJ 1 0 o C
rl C VI
It III
11 rl C 1J D 1 1 C I
ccn
SN
n1Il
llJ 1 llJ 0 t z l llJ 0 1 C III
1 III
IT1 Vl1
l og
o1
tt r ID J V1
o 3 o C tt tt t ID ID 3 SlJ
ID VI
lC o o 0 0 C VI
s ID VI
VI
VIID s V
IID
I Ol iJ L
ttsV
lo
III
tttt
III
oID
ss
lCSl
J
PJ00oID 0 lll
lCV
IID
CV
I
0 VI
0 ID t o III o 3 0 s ID 0 VI
SlJ
s lC VI
o t V1 3 o s
Il D1
SlJ
III
ros
0i
III
01
0III Ul
1III
IDT
10
III
ZllJ
VI
Vl
C 00
VI
1 0
crE
IDn
VI
llJ
r SlJ
III
ID
llJ
I V1 IJJ
o c III
0 1
T1
0z
III
III
CllJ
s0
r ID0
n0
Ul c
n1
r III
llJ 1tt ID V
III
I
gID
llJ0 3 o
llJ
1DUl 1
tt r PJ s 10 3 o s tt r o ID
l 01
CSOr
DllJ
III
1s
1w
00
s II
VI
n s II D
sIII
0 IDllJ
n ID 00 ttI
0 s
llJ 0 llJ l III
o n o c llJ 0
I jl IJ
tt
rID
0ID V
I0
ns
OlC
3tt
00
IDtt
ttr
ttID
oC
s
o n PJ 0 ID tt ID ID VI
o s III s 0 0 IIItt II
I
VIID n ID V
I
n o VItt V
I
I J ID VI
VI
s III
ID SlJ
VI
r ID ID
NN
NI0lU
1
IiI
JliJ T1
Z
JV
ll
cO
oO
Zc
O
Vlo
nOI
l
4lO
lOlO
o
al
nlO
O
OcD
T
Cc
On
tt3
0
nl
3J
5g
3l
ClO
C
J0
00
lCn
co
11
J3
j
o3
T
Cc
T11
0l
n3
11
1e
lg
00
tO
VI
no
l0
PJ0
11S
J11
00
l
oQ
c0 0
nT
o 3 3 cn
JT
tt
0 0 o o
lO lO l 11
ZIl
EEI
ol
ll
0
2ET
n
Vi
T
VI
O
J9
0lO
ool
ttlO
ttl
lIIO
rTO
Ot
ott
Q3
3l
ON
OT
Oo
t0
tt0
3d5
T
0111o
IJ
0 rn
TJ
011
lCl
t0 0
lI
J0
o Cl l
VI
I
t2
I oN io rJ L
i
T1
Z
n T lO l T n T 11 o 0 11 l 0 o c 11 lO l
1 3 l 11 o V1 0 T l
VI
C n r PJ I 1 t
N w IJiItt
rV
lt t
aV
IPJ
rlC
VI
PJ
8J
n PJ 0 1 n t a t J n 1
11 l l
1 c 11 l l l I l l c l T c lO 3 l 11 11 l n o c 0 o n x 0 o 11
1 0
lClor
ttt
32E
31
tn
J 11J ro
Jtt
CL
ttIt
30
ttI C0
It lPJ J
IV
I
VI
2EIt
lr t
1r
Itlt
VI 10
CI
J lCIt
l0
VI
VI
Ct ra
l1
C1
VI
JI
Jt V
IV
I
2t
ItV
I
It 7In o
Vl
3 3 C J
t
It lJttt
7 lJ tT
VI
n1r o o
N N J r 31
02E
Jott r
7 Jn lCr PJ
JtC
ot
C1 I
nI
ot
3 3C
J ttPJ V
It V
I
a o tt r o C tt t VI
PJ J a n r tt t VI
tt t VI
a C tt
VI
7 1 1 0 VI
tt
On behalf of all current AFN ISPs except Unicorn whqwe couldn t reach
Since AFN s inception a founding principle articulated by the City has been that thesystem would have an open architecture to allow local ISPs the opportunity to
offer services completely tailored to the local community While the ISP businessis not one with a large margin and as a result several of the original ISPs on AFNhave ceased to exist the majority of the ISPs have successfully brought a widerange of distinctive services to Ashland citizens Satisfaction with th servicesprovided by these ISPs remains high And it is clear that the Internet portion ofAFN s operations has been financially successful helping to provide funds to cover
other areas of AFN s operation
High Speed Internet usage by Ashland citizens is higher than e ge The City s
business climate has been significantly stimulated by AFN s attraction ofbusinesses drawn to Ashland by the Internet services available through AFN and itspartner ISPs Examples of such businesses include Plexis Health Carle Treestar andthe Leela Foundation These and other similar businesses bring family wageenvironmentally friendly jobs to the City as a result of the services providedthrough AFN s partner ISPs Additionally the ISPs themselves colleetively add to
the creation of such employment opportunities
Thus both from financial and operational standpoint AFN s ISPs believe thatthe current ISP operations through AFN must be judged a success
While recognizing the overall financial challenges facing the City ov rAFN we
believe the City s ultimate disposition of AFN should be made in light of the
following observations
The 7 originally 9 ISPs have partnered with the City to successfully establish theInternet services offered through AFN During the AFN Options Cornmittee studysession with the City Council on November 29 it was stated that what the Cityreally had to sell or lease was the AFN system s client base While the City owns
the cable TV client base that is not the case for the ISPs customers
Were a sale or llease of the system to include the ISP customer base and not to
include clear provisions assuring the ISPs continued ability to use the system on
terms comparable to those which have existed until now the City would be seekingto sell something customers to which the city has no rightful claim
The ISPs have worked diligently to establish and maintain a mutually supportiverelationship with the City inAFN All of the ISPs have engaged in activepromotion of AJN Internet service over other Internet connection choices forAshland residents Much of the system s success is directly traceable to our
promotional efforts We do not therefore believe it is appropriate for the City toseek to take possession of our client base to sell Such a step would be bothinconsistent with the relationship we have created with the City and we believe
contrary to the wishes of the City residents who are our clients
It is in the spirit of continuing the type of relationship we have historically enjoyedwith the City that none of the ISPs have sought to take protective recourse againstthat possibility
The City should however be aware that one or more ISPs have actively exploredmigrating their Icustomers to DSL connections to replace AFN We recognize that
doing so would likely significantly accelerate public unease over AFN and throwAFN into a serious revenue decline which would at a minimum devalue anddestabilize the City s sale or lease opportunities for AFN
Further complicating the City s financial challenges with AFN or adding confusionto the current circumstance is not our goal We wish to constructively assist theCity in seeking solutions to its current AFN challenges
Accordingly wle wish to respectfully request that the City IF it decides to pursuesale or lease options for AFN do so solely with parties who commit to preserveexisting access arrangements with the ISP partners who have made a long term
investment in hc lping the City develop AFN
Thank you
I tV oJ
i
Mail Tribune Sunday May 18 2003
What Is This Thing Called
The Motley Fool
Remember ShakespeareRemember ils YouLike I
In Elizabethan days Fools were the onlypeople who could get away with telling
the truth to the King or QueenThe Motley 1001 tells the truth about
investing and hopes you ll laugh all
l t
Telecoms Ring With Debt
Standard Poor s pointed Oll
recently that telecom and cable hrms
have amassed about 206 bllhon 111
debt roughly 20 billion of which will
eome due through 2005 The strongestplayers most notably the regionalBells issued much of the debt and
will likely have no problem refinancingtheir obligations
Not so for the weakest
players S P describes the
likelihood of paymentfrom firms such as QwestCommunications NYSE
Q and Charter Communications Nas
daq CHTR which owe mOl e than 6
billion and 1 billion respectIvelymaturing by 2005 as worrisome to
highly doubtfulTelecom has suflered greatly these
past several years Defland fOT productsand services vanished Just as hrms com
pleted extensive network upgradesfinanced by massive debt The saddest
part of this saga i that fraud seems to
have taken a heaVIer toll on the firms
that played fairly as they struggled to
keep up with the phantom growth of
their unscrupulous competitors hose
same competitors are now emergmg
from bankruptcy debt free
Cheats such as WoddCom now
emerging from bankruptcy are in a
better position to compete than before
Worse their defaults have soured the
credit markets on the industry makmgit difficult for the honest firms to getfunding
With few options the weakest playerswill scurry to renegotiate debt mat un
ties or sell assets More defaults and
bankruptcies are likely Be careful in
this suffering sector or Ilist stay away
s 20 f13
D CL V fJs VII Cf VI Jr
Cr1y Lv V II C
P t2C1 V J qtt C1L tj WS FC1fJV
c v t cJe iV11m I U11 S Ct1 V JayVet YOlA L It f tv Z
ft5 rut J uS h rVVlPl
t 1 e5Cu
Tk b lt Cv 52 5 H1flt Itv CVlV wv flyafhc I
c
VltJ q I nv5t cd I t2ve 7fd 1I vh WLl q V J Bill hL t 5 VlrJ v J w rd e
ff It weVelV if Crt VIV ue ty clq 1M fJ
t1I 11vhS flf ctfdla IviU ftf 1 ICoh 02 VI a C VW iI
fJ f Vi a ffajo t c f iy l
VI 11 h Cf til LP v Ph
I ovV iJ J t t 11 VI q l ftl111t t T
cifj Cri rvV1vt Glh orJsje rAffJVaJ u
1J rt tLVr hR bvf I trUL vj
rif It ftv C7t h J t0L TV4 cv t fry
rk c tl 1 Yl5 of tf h C1 J
5 VJ J2 vJjy
tv C lrtfit
p G1Fr
ClJYl
Lenny Neimark380 Kent Street Ashland OR 97520
541 482 6218
lneimarkiiio pendoo r com
FromDate
Ashland City Council MayorCity Administrator City Finance DirectorAFN Options Committee AFN Programming CommitteeAshland Budget Committee
Lenny NeimarkDecember 18 2005
To
Copy
Honorable Mayor Esteemed Councilors and Weary Staff
Iwanted to add my voice observations and recommendations to the immensityofbabble you have been hearing for all too long now concerning AFN and the upcomingchoices you must make perhaps as soonas this week in regard to its future viabilityand very existence
First let me state that Ihave been aproponent supporter and AFN enthusiast
since it first kicked its tiny little digital feet Iserved for five exciting years as an initialmember ofthe AFN Citizen s Programming Committee As aprivate computer and
networking consultant Ihave assisted and or been responsible for scores of clients and
acquaintances using or switching to AFN internet and acquiring AFN cable TVservicesAs a developer and business owner outside the city limits Ienvy the availability of AFN
quality services to residents and businesses within Ashland services that many outsideAshland do not have easy or reliable access to And as a father ofyoung twins and an
AFN cable and internet using resident of our fine city since day one Ivalue and am
deeply thankful that my city leaders had the foresight years ago to authorize build and
provide me and my family and my neighbors with the many tangible and intangiblebenefits ofour Ashland Fiber Network
That said Iam frustrated disillusioned and even appalled that AFN has been
allowed to descend into the dire straights in which it now finds itself and Ichoose the
word allowed with meticulous care because 1 this deplorable situation was far from
unavoidable and 2 it was caused not by circumstances but bypeople
For the past several weeks now Ihave listened to many in our city tell their
stories ofAFN Ihave asked questions ofcertain staff past and present Ihave read and
reread Tidings articles letters to the editor and other published opinions Ihave
reviewed and studied AFN contracts city minutes ofvarious council and committee
meetings the 2001 AFN Advisory Committee Report the 2004 Navigant report and the
recent AFN Options Committee Report Iperused the recent staff generated AFN
contracting review memos and attended last week s Council study session And frankly I
page 1 of6
am amazed that so many people including seemingly each and every one of ou
continue to ask what has gone wrong or what can we do
This is incredibly easy There is absolutely nothing about ourAFN operationsparticularly now that we are beyond with admitted qualification initial build out that
requires the expertise of rocket scientists much less one more body of consultingexperts after another
Plain and simple the single most causative problem AFN has everhad and
unfortunately continues to have is a management problem apeople problem the
wrong people in the wrong position at the wrong time In anutshell this thing has been
mismanaged from the top And everyone seems afraid tosay it
Quite frankly I thinkat this point it is oflittle consequence or importance to tryto figure out why Iwatched all ofyou last week at the study session tiptoe everso
gently with apoliteness and feigned civility that is ofno service to anyone when it is
costing our city and the people you represent notjust millions of real dollars but also
compromises the very existence of acritical service and infrastructure that other
municipalities and communities across our country are dying to acquire aservice and
infrastructure that could have should have and Ibelieve still can work and provideuntold benefit toour city
So with a respectful and cordial nod to the Peter Principal and to those who have
somehow found themselves in positions ofresponsibility beyond their competence or
capacity to meet Isay thanks for your time and efforts and now please get outofthe
way And since none ofyou councilors mayor or top tier staff seem willing toname
names Iguess it s just going to have to fall to someone from the outside The first to go
has got tobe Mr Holbo current AFN Operations Superintendent He remains the one
constant who has survived the inadequacies ofboth Mr Lovrovitch and Mr
Wanderscheid and it is the considered opinion of many Ihave discussed this with that
Mr Holbo has succeeded in creating a misguided almost personal empire that controls
virtually every aspect ofAFN operations from spending contracting technical services
terms of service availability of services customer satisfaction marketability of services
and who also may single handedly though perhaps unwittingly be responsible for a
preponderance ofthe negative perception that portions of our community have towards
AFN
Notwithstanding Mr Holbo s argumentative defensive and oftentimes
schizophrenic missives as evidenced for example by his August 4 2005 email to the
AFN Options Committee in which he claims to take no umbrage with our erstwhile
Tidings reporter using my statement that includes reticent and butt in the same
sentence or more recently his December 14 2005 email toyou Council with the
subject line AFN Economics 101 wherein he fumbles to justify and excusehimself
against Mr Ed Shull s recently public critique ofAFN in general and ofMr Holbo in
particular how can anyone help but wonder why people throw up their hands and walk
away from AFN For alas this is the public face ofAFN as it exists today
page 2 of6
If anyone cares todig deeper Isuspect you can findplenty of cause or whateverelse it is you may need to ask Mr Holbo to step aside The bottom line in the opinion of
many is that if Mr Holbo stays involved with AFN no matter what you decide to dowith it whether keeping it as acity run entity spinning it off as anon profit turning itinto acommon carrier or any other hybrid whatsoever AFN is doomed to failure He s
got to go
This does not excuse significant mistakes and oversights made and allowed underthe watchofboth Mr Lovrovitch and Mr Wanderscheid but those individuals are no
longer part ofthe current AFN equation so lets notwaste precious time trying to figureout whatwent amuck there As far as Mr Tuneberg s involvement with all due respectMr Tuneberg is not the person tobe overseeing AFN at this critical time This is simplynot his field of expertise At the core AFN s problems are not financial they are
managerial The negative numbers are symptoms People are the cause Which brings us
to Mr Grimaldi
Since Ive managed to out virtually everyone else the other obstacle that many
people see to righting the mismanagement ills that AFN has had to endure so long isthat Mr Grimaldi whether acting or as the case may be not acting due to caution
loyalty tohis staff his imminent departure or lack oftime energy or resources to dig as
deeply as perhaps he should is no doubt notvery inclined tobe asking people like Mr
Holbo to step aside It is likely that both he and Mr Tuneberg are simply too close to the
players and circumstances to see much less act boldly on the big picture And whocould blame them What amess Yet that is exactly what they must do And what youthe Council must urge them to do
On the other side ofthe managerial tipping point you have Mr Ainsworth whohas struggled with way too few resources and far too many operational obstacles to
enable anything having to do with AFN television make sense Isay this with aheavyheart because Ibelieved in AFN TVand I feel personally responsible for many of the
unique and superior channels that we had chosen for our community but the sad realityis AFN television has got to go and along with it Mr Ainsworth becomes acasualty I
see no way with advancing technology requirements upcoming FCC requirements and
hard core competitive realities that AFN television can everbe viable And with thedemise ofAFN television say goodbye to Mr Zauskey as well because with no AFN
television there is no need for cable TVutility billing personnel So what does this leave
us A handful ofAFN technicians and installers with no senior managers Is this a
problem Not for a month or two until an interim director can be brought on boardWill the entire network collapse if we do this No Imean what if Mr Holbo as the onlycurrent operational manager ofAFN suddenly became incapacitated or otherwiseunable toperform his duties Would the network collapse If so then we ve got a much
bigger problem than perhaps anybody ever dreamed of And if not then we can and willsurvive just fine until we bring in the new managerial A team
Please understand this is really difficult I know and very much respect and like a
lot ofthese people But that doesn tmean they should remain or as in the case ofMr
Holbo be entrusted with righting the self created wrongs that have contributed to the
failures ofAFN All the other minutiae ofwhat to do and how to save AFN not
page 3 of6
withstanding the one thing that absolutely has tohappen if any ofthe other steps are
ever to succeed is a complete change ofscenery when it comes toAFN management and
senior operations Ifyou ignore this reality there is nothing else you or anyone can ever
do that will matter You might as well hold your fire sale today and enjoy the bag of
popcorn you ll be able tobuy from the proceeds
Please ask urge or demand that Mr Grimaldi find anew AFN OperationsSuperintendent without delay And take the bold yet easy step ofhiring aqualifiedinterim AFN director now Whether you sell keep or spin offAFN you will need this
person to steer the ship through the transition nomatter how long or briefthat processis Don tworry about someone not being interested in the job because it may soon not
exist Use that possibility as leverage to inspire and motivate an interim director to
succeed and assure his future permanent employment There is no other way There is
nothing that you or anyone else can do that will work if you don t take these unavoidable
steps first
Thank you foryour gracious time and consideration Perhaps Ive waited too longtocommunicate to you what seems so obvious to me But as you can see Ifeel
passionately about AFN and about our city doing everything that it can to ensure AFN s
continued existence economic viability and success Its that important And its that
simple
Respectfully
12LrI
I
Lenny Neimark
page 4 of6
Some additional not so random notes thoughts and suggestions about all this
All ofwhich are secondary to addressing the items discussed on the previous pages
Ive looked at the revenue contracts the expense contracts the operationalcontracts This is not hard Running and managing AFN is not in spite ofall
appearances a terribly complex thing As noted in last week s study session managingAFN utterly pales in comparison to the complexity ofrunning and managing asewagetreatment plant adam and water treatment facility amajor road reconstruction There
is nothing inherently wrong or broken with the basic premise or construct ofAFN Its
ills can almost entirely be attributed to apast and current absence of fundamental
managerial oversight Most any competent smart straight forward committed person
with integrity could run AFN successfully Yes Ithink its that simple
Based on all my discussions with numbers ofpeople here s one solid scenario for
what you our City Council can do to both resurrect and save AFN while also ensuring a
progressive and viable state of the art communications infrastructure for the citizens ofAshland
1 Get rid ofAFN television Sell the subscribers and equipment for as much as you
can get and be done with it2 Immediately dismiss all current AFN top operational management3 Utilize currentAFN technicians along with interim citizen volunteer expertise to
keep the system up and running4 Hire anew interim manager
s Develop job descriptions and hire new permanent managementConsider creation ofa combined AFNjlnformation Technology ComputerServices Department This is already loosely in place Those two functions could
coexist nicely togetherThe new management positions could bea AFN j Information Technology Director Department Head
b Network Operations Director
replaces current Operations Superintendent and oversees both AFN
Services and ITjComputer Services
c Director ofMarketing Emerging TechnologiesEconomic Development
6 Resurrect AFN Citizen s Advisory Committee for ongoing input oversight7 Provide AFN access via wireless to every city resident not currently served who
wants it8 Review set new standards and renegotiate all existing AFN contracts as
necessary including revenue contracts with ISPs and competitive bids or quotesfor services from providers such as Qwest and Hunter
9 Review and revise terms of service as necessary10 Enforce strict new pricing guidelines with clear cut differentiation between
residential and business users
11 Encourage partnerships to resell or redistribute bandwidth to nearbyneighborhoods communities and businesses in a way that ensures ongoingrevenue to the city
page 5of6
Perhaps the new department might look something like this
Cityof AshlandAshland Fiber Network Department of Information Technology
fIlCDnpUlBCStJtkfi
DirectorAFN IInfomtatlon Technology
HttlIId
AFN
WebmasterlWebslte DeveIIT Network Administrator
Tech Support Team
P rammer
AFN Network Administrator
Technicians
Instel s
One last thought regarding the AFN deficit That unfortunate reality at this pointin time has virtually nothing to do with how you choose to address AFN s woes That
debt is now aunique and separate burden on the city that Ibelieve should be
considered coped with and addressed completely apart from whatever decisions you
make concerning AFN and its future The debt remains no matter what So make the
debt problem its own agenda item as you move forward in determining the fate of AFN
page 60f6
AFN Decision Process
David Chapman December 19 2005
What is a Common Carrier or Open Network
In a common carrier network model the owner of the network does
not control the content of the cable The owner provides only the connectionand charges a fee for the use of the system In the open network modell the
use of the network is available to multiple vendors to provide a variety of
services to the consumer over their connection This wholesale model is
very close to what AFN Internet is providing to its customers today AFN
TV could be considered one of these vendors An open network should
allow the true effects of market competition Providing the infrastructure
should reduce the cost of business entry for companies Our system has
some limitations due to the composition of the signals It would be hard to
have competing TV services for instance
What is the difference between public non profit and private networks
The economic purpose of non profit entities can be to benefit the
consumer as opposed to maximizing profit for the owners This does not
mean that sound business decisions are not required It does mean that
community goals could be considered profit The goal of a non profitnetwork might be To provide to the city and all of its residents a connection
to the network with the most bandwidth at the least cost
What is the Common Carrier or Open Network Option
The AFN Options Committee reported that the common carrier optionhad unexplored potential Paul Collins of the Committee and I with the aid
of staff and others have looked at additional options If you assume that
AFN TV can be separated from the operation of a common carrier then
several things become clear The management and operation of the network
alone is simplified and becomes financially viable I have enclosed a
spreadsheet that shows the operation in house It can pay as much or more
debt service than the proposed spin off Therefore this organization could
work either in the city as a service or as a spin offAn initial look at AFN TV as shown that this has been the financial
drain on AFN We have not structured our tiers and rates to cover expensesI think it is possible to turn this around for the present However it is my
opinion that the TV service should not remain in the city due to uncerltaintyin the business and a number of other factors I do feel that it would
preferable to maintain TV as a locally owned and operated service We must
evaluate the sale and spin off offers in terms of public service as well as
reduction of debt
What is the process that we should follow to make an AFN deCision
Follow the path suggested by the AFN Options Committee with
additional considerations
1 Have staff bring to the council offers for the sale or spin off of AFN
Make clear that we would like two types of offers
a AFN as a whole
b AFNTVonly2 Have staff determine what is required to be retained in a sale or what
arrangements must be made with the spin off for the operation of the
city3 In order to evaluate offers we need to be able to place a value on the
system to the city4 Determine how to handle the remaining debt
Ashland Open Net Deptment
Revenue Internet
Revenue highspeedTotal Revenue
Personal Services
Salaries and Wages
Fringe Benefits
Total Personal Services
Materials and Services
SuppliesRental Repair Maintainance
Communications
Contractual Services
Misc Charges and Fees
Other Purchased SuppliesFranchises
Total Materials and Services
Operating income
Capital Outlay
Equipment
Improvements Other Than Bldgs
Total Capital Outlay
Net cash flow
1 235 817
2134831 449 300
Network dir @ 92K Tech Mgr @ 70K 3
309 300techs @ 49K
148 464
457 764
Reviewed by Lee
121 179
54 951
346115 080
Central services portion of this cut about in
142 157 half
2 741
o
339 569
651 968
100 000
20 000
Holbo said 125K 1 time would bring120 000 hardware up to date
531 968