implementing transcutaneous bilirubinometry in...
TRANSCRIPT
Implementing transcutaneous bilirubinometry in
jaundiced newborns: a randomized controlled trial
R.M.C. Pepping
November, 2015
Supervisor
J. Bekhof, M.D. PhD.
Paediatrician
Medicine, Master year 3
Research Clerkship
Department of Paediatrics, Isala hospital, Zwolle
Student number: 1720805
1
Abstract Introduction: Evaluation of hyperbilirubinemia in jaundiced neonates is performed by
determining serum bilirubin (SB) through painful blood sampling. The use of non-invasive
transcutaneous bilirubinometry instead, may reduce this need for blood sampling, herewith
decreasing pain and stress.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial including hospitalized jaundiced neonates ≥32weeks
gestational age was performed. The intervention group used a transcutaneous bilirubinometer
(Dräger Jaundice Meter-103, JM-103) measurement (TcB) on the sternum and the control
group used standard care, where the decision to obtain SB was based on visual and clinical
assessment. Indication for phototherapy or exchange transfusion was made according to the
international guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics. When TcB was less than
50µmol/L below the threshold for phototherapy, SB was obtained. The decision to start
treatment was always based on an SB value.
Results: A total of 176 neonates were randomized. In the intervention group (n=86), 60
neonates (69.8%) had at least one SB taken, versus 87 (96.7%) in the control group (n=90)
(difference 26.9; 95%CI 11.7 - 42.0; p<0.001). The number of blood samples per neonate in
the intervention group (1.3, SD1.3), was 27% lower than in the control group (1.9, SD1.0)
(difference -0.51; 95%CI -0.81 - -0.17; p=0.003). The highest SB value was higher in the
intervention group (232 µmol/L, SD53L) than in the control group (209 µmol/L, SD60;
95%CI 4.72 - 42.55; p=0.015). Though this was not considered as clinically relevant; we
found no difference in need to treatment, nor treatment duration or hospitalization length,
exchange transfusions did not occur.
Conclusion: The use of transcutaneous bilirubinometry is safe, feasible and reduces invasive
blood sampling in jaundiced neonates with 27%.
Samenvatting Introductie: Beoordeling van hyperbilirubinemie bij gele pasgeborenen gebeurt door middel
van bepaling van het serum bilirubine (SB) na een bloedafname. Een non-invasieve
transcutane bilirubinemeter zou het aantal bloedafnames kunnen verminderen met als gevolg
minder pijnsensaties en stressreacties voor de pasgeborene.
Methode: In een gerandomiseerde gecontroleerde trial werden gele pasgeborenen ≥32weken
amenorroeduur geïncludeerd. In de interventiegroep werd een transcutane bilirubinemeter
(Dräger Jaundice Meter-103, JM-103) op het sternum geplaatst voor een transcutane
bilirubinemeting (TcB). In de controlegroep werd na visuele en klinische beoordeling
besloten of een SB bepaling nodig was. De indicatie voor fototherapie of wisseltransfusie
werd gesteld aan de hand van internationale richtlijnen van de American Academy of
Pediatrics. Indien de TcB minder dan 50µmol/L van de drempelwaarden voor fototherapie
werd gemeten, volgde een SB bepaling. Behandeling werd gestart op basis van SB.
Resultaten: In totaal zijn 176 pasgeborenen gerandomiseerd. In de interventiegroep (n=86)
werd bij 60 pasgeborenen (69,8%) minimaal één SB bepaald, versus 87 (96,7%) in de
controlegroep (n=90) (verschil 26.9; 95%BI 11.7 - 42.0; p<0.001). Het aantal bloedafnames
per pasgeborene in de interventiegroep (1.3, SD1.3) was 27,4% lager dan in de controlegroep
(1.9, SD1.0) (verschil -0.51; 95%BI -0.81tot-0.17; p=0.003). De hoogste serum
bilirubinewaarde was hoger in de interventiegroep (232µmol/L, SD53) dan in de
controlegroep (209µmol/L, SD60; 95%BI 4.72 - 42.55 p= 0.015). Dit verschil was niet
klinisch relevant: we vonden geen verschil in de noodzaak tot behandeling, noch in de
behandelduur of opnameduur, wisseltransfusies waren niet nodig.
Conclusie: Het gebruik van een transcutane bilirubinemeter is veilig, toepasbaar en zorgt
voor een afname van 27% van invasieve, pijnlijke en stressvolle bloedafnames bij gele
pasgeborenen.
2
Table of contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4
1.1 Neonatal icterus ................................................................................................................ 4
1.1.1 Neonatal icterus in the Netherlands ............................................................................ 4
1.2 Bilirubin ............................................................................................................................ 4
1.3 Hyperbilirubinemia ........................................................................................................... 5
1.3.1 Physiology .................................................................................................................. 5
1.3.2 Pathophysiology ......................................................................................................... 5
1.3.3 Clinical presentation and risk factors ......................................................................... 5
1.4 Diagnose ........................................................................................................................... 6
1.4.1 Transcutaneous bilirubinometry ................................................................................. 6
1.5 Treatment of hyperbilirubinemia ...................................................................................... 6
1.5.1 Phototherapy ............................................................................................................... 7
1.5.2 Exchange transfusion .................................................................................................. 7
1.5.3 Pharmalogical interventions ....................................................................................... 7
1.6 Aim of this study ............................................................................................................... 7
2. Methods .................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Setting ............................................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Patient population ............................................................................................................. 8
2.3 Transcutaneous bilirubinometry ....................................................................................... 8
2.4 Study protocol ................................................................................................................... 8
2.5 Randomisation, allocation and blinding ........................................................................... 9
2.6 Study approval .................................................................................................................. 9
2.7 Measurements of outcome ................................................................................................ 9
2.8 Data collection ................................................................................................................ 10
2.9 Sample size and statistical analysis ................................................................................. 10
3. Results .................................................................................................................................. 11
3.1 Patients ............................................................................................................................ 11
3.2 Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 12
3.3 Primary outcome variable ............................................................................................... 12
3.4 Secondary outcome variables.......................................................................................... 14
3.4.1 Highest serum bilirubin ............................................................................................ 14
3.4.2 Phototherapy ............................................................................................................. 14
3.4.3 Additional outcome variables ................................................................................... 14
3.4.4 Costs ......................................................................................................................... 15
3.4.5 Escape decision ......................................................................................................... 15
3
3.4.6 Agreement between TcB and serum bilirubin .......................................................... 15
4. Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 17
4.1 Main findings .................................................................................................................. 17
4.2 Comparison with existing literature ................................................................................ 17
4.3 Study limitations and strengths ....................................................................................... 19
4.4 Future research and recommendations ............................................................................ 20
5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 20
6. References ............................................................................................................................ 21
7. Appendix A .......................................................................................................................... 25
4
1. Introduction
1.1 Neonatal icterus Neonatal icterus or neonatal jaundice is a very common phenomenon in newborn babies. (1,2)
Jaundice is the observed yellow pigmentation of skin and sclerae, caused by a rise in
concentration of bilirubin (section 1.2). (3) The term neonatal jaundice is therefore used
interchangeably with the term neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. It is important to diagnose
hyperbilirubinemia, as high levels of bilirubin can cause potential, irreversible neurological
damage (section 1.3). (4) To quantify hyperbilirubinemia in visibly jaundiced neonates
appropriately, it is necessary to determine the bilirubin level in the serum by a blood sample
and not to rely only on sight (section 1.4). (4-7) When the bilirubin concentration in the
sample exceeds a certain threshold, according to international guidelines, treatment existing of
phototherapy or even exchange transfusion is required (section 1.5). Many possible causes for
neonatal hyperbilirubinemia exist, whereby the great majority of cases is due to a transient
physiologic jaundice and a minority is caused by pathological conditions (section 1.3.2).
Therefore, it is challenging to decide whether jaundiced non-ill neonate needs an invasive
blood sample taken? (section 1.6)
1.1.1 Neonatal icterus in the Netherlands
In the Netherlands, 50% - 60% of newborns become jaundiced during the first week of life.(8)
The exact incidence of hyperbilirubinemia that requires treatment however, is unknown. (9)
In 2008, the Paediatric Association of the Netherlands (Nederlandse Vereniging voor
Kindergeneeskunde, NVK) made an estimate, based on combining different Dutch registration
systems which state that in 2% - 5% of jaundiced an intervention to treat hyperbilirubinemia
is warranted. The NVK guideline states: “when in doubt, take a blood sample.” (9) As doubt
is often the case, a high number of often needless, painful and stressful blood samples are
taken, as a consequence (section 1.4). (10) Fortunately, new studies show that a valid, non-
invasive alternative method is available, that determinates the bilirubin level in the skin
through transcutaneous bilirubinometry. (4,9,11-14) This method is not only more patient
friendly, but also reduces the need and costs for blood sampling (section 1.4.1). (10,12,15,16)
1.2 Bilirubin Bilirubin is a toxic end product of heme catabolism. (2) Due to this catabolism, which takes
place in the reticuloendothelial system, a red blood cell is broken down and as a result
bilirubin comes into the blood serum. (17) When a red blood cell is broken down, heme is
degraded into biliverdin during heme oxygenase which is found in the liver, spleen and
macrophages. The enzyme biliverdin reductase then converts biliverdin into bilirubin. This
bilirubin is called unconjugated bilirubin or indirect bilirubin, which will bind to albumin and
finally be released into the circulation. (2) As a complex with the albumin, bilirubin is
transported through the hepatocyte membrane to the endoplasmatic reticulum, where
unconjugated bilirubin will be conjugated. (2,8) This conjugation is crucial for efficient
biliary excretion of bilirubin. Conjugated bilirubin or direct bilirubin is excreted into the
duodenum, where intestinal bacteria degrade conjugated bilirubin to urobilinogen and further
into stercobilinogen. These latter two give the normal colour to respectively urine and faeces,
which will be excreted from the body containing bilirubin. (2) Most of the urobilinogen
however, is degraded into unconjugated bilirubin again and reabsorbed from the intestines,
then transported to the liver where it undergoes the so-called enterohepatic circulation.
Therefore, this urobilinogen is one of the major mechanisms responsible for neonatal
icterus.(17)
5
1.3 Hyperbilirubinemia 1.3.1 Physiology
Hyperbilirubinemia is caused by a high level of bilirubin in blood serum. Neonates have a
much higher production of bilirubin than adults, which causes hyperbilirubinemia. (2) There
are two main reasons for this. Firstly, there is a postnatal rapid rise due to a combination of a
high bilirubin load and a decreased hepatic excretion. The latter in view of the fact that all
neonates have relatively impaired hepatic function during the transitional period after birth.
(2,3) Secondly, there is a high concentration of haemoglobin containing about 80% foetal
haemoglobin, which will be replaced by adult haemoglobin during the first four months of
life. (2,8) This haemoglobin turnover is a major factor in the excess bilirubin production. But
also bruising during birth and cephalohematomas will contribute to higher bilirubin
concentrations, with hyperbilirubinemia as a result. (2) A neonate is not yet able to cope with
the normal bilirubin concentration, let alone the increased concentrations due to
aforementioned different mechanisms. Consequently, a hint of jaundice can be expected and
this is in most cases a physiological phenomenon.
1.3.2 Pathophysiology
When neonatal icterus appears in the first 24 hours after birth, it is always defined as
pathological, mostly due to active hemolysis, and needs further investigation. This form of
jaundice is by far the most dangerous, as the concentration of unconjugated bilirubin can rise
rapidly to a neurotoxic and damaging level; causing acute bilirubin encephalopathy and in
worst case kernicterus. (2,17,18) Acute bilirubin encephalopathy is the first clinical
presentation of elevated bilirubin concentrations, presenting with central nervous system
symptoms (section 1.3.3). (4,19) Kernicterus is nowadays also called chronic bilirubin
encephalopathy, because it is usually a consequence of severe or untreated acute bilirubin
encephalopathy. Kernicterus is caused by deposits of unconjugated bilirubin in different
nuclei of the brain, turning them yellow, hence kernicterus. Unconjugated bilirubin is water
insoluble and therefore able to cross the blood-brain barrier. (18,19) Bilirubin deposits
develop when the concentration increases to a certain level and cross the blood-brain barrier.
(18) Especially the globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus and different vulnerable nuclei in the
brainstem, such as the auditory, the oculomotor and the vestibular nuclei, are damaged by
these deposits. (19) Therefore, it is very important to identify the cases of hyperbilirubinemia
that are in need for treatment; in order to prevent (irreversible) neurological damage.
1.3.3 Clinical presentation and risk factors
The clinical presentation of hyperbilirubinemia has a variety of symptoms, is not always clear
and often non-symptomatic. Acute bilirubin encephalopathy is divided into three phases: the
initial phase is characterized by feeding problems, hypotonia, drowsiness and lethargy; the
intermediate phase is characterized by irritability and hypertonia, the latter can cause
retrocollis and ophisthotonus, they may also develop a fever and a high pitched cry. These
symptoms and the symptoms from the initial phase can alternate. When the advanced and last
phase is sustained the neurological damage is generally irreversible; typical symptoms during
this phase are apnoea’s, high fever, stupor to coma, seizures and all aforementioned
symptoms. This phase has unfortunately a high mortality rate. (4,9,19)
Kernicterus will develop if the abovementioned is survived. Classical symptoms are athetotic
cerebral palsy, auditory dysfunction, dental enamel dysplasia, vertical gaze palsy and
sometimes intellectual and other handicaps. (4,9) Luckily, kernicterus is rare and the
incidence for kernicterus is very low worldwide. (20-22)
The major risk factor for developing hyperbilirubinemia is haemolytic diseases of the
newborn, these rapidly increase the level of unconjugated bilirubin. There is a variety of
6
haemolytic diseases, rhesus and AB0 blood group incompatibility being the most frequent
causes of early rising bilirubin levels. (2,4) Sepsis, prematurity, bruises and
cephalohematomas, siblings who received hyperbilirubinemia treatment and exclusive
breastfeeding are other important factors.
1.4 Diagnose The standard method, the gold standard, to determine hyperbilirubinemia is to obtain an
invasive serum bilirubin sample. (7,9) This is, after the routine screening for inborn errors, the
most frequent reason to perform a venous heel prick in neonates. (10,12) These heel pricks are
painful, traumatizing, time-consuming, costly and not to mention a serious cause of distress
for the neonates, as well as for their parents. (7,10,23) There is no way to establish for certain
if it is necessary to obtain a serum bilirubin; it is a subjective decision made by the
professional. (9,24) This decision is in most cases based on a visual assessment of the
jaundice, usually led by Kramer’s rule, which states a cranio-caudal system that correlates
with the serum bilirubin. (25) As a result, 17% to 71% of jaundiced neonates has a blood
sample taken for bilirubin concentration at least one time. (26,27) Whereas, as
aforementioned only 2% - 5% of the jaundiced neonates need actual treatment (section 1.1.1).
(9,26) Therefore, many of the blood samples, up to 77% - 78%, are unnecessary (24,26,27)
and put neonates each time at risk of complications such as anaemia, infection, needle stick
injuries and even osteomyelitis. (28,29) Moreover, over the past two decades, many studies
demonstrate a poor resemblance between Kramer’s visual rule and the serum bilirubin. (5-
7,10,11,15,26)
1.4.1 Transcutaneous bilirubinometry
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry is a good and reliable, non-invasive screening method to
detect hyperbilirubinemia that requires treatment. Since the 1980s, the use of a transcutaneous
bilirubinometer has already been described to detect hyperbilirubinemia and to decrease heel
pricks and costs. (23) But strangely enough, little use is made of it since then, also in the
Netherlands. (4,9,16,27) Several instruments have been developed over the past three decades
and these have all been extensively studied in comparison to serum bilirubin and Kramer’s
rule. (7,10,11,15,16,21,30,31) This novel method shows excellent results that correlate very
well with serum bilirubin. (7,10,11,15,16,30,32)
One of the best studied devices is the Dräger Minolta/Hill-Rom Air-Shields Transcutaneous
Jaundice Meter 103 (JM-103). This device uses a dual optical path system and two
wavelengths to establish the bilirubin load in the subcutaneous tissue and deeper layers, hence
transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB). (30) The best measuring place to establish the bilirubin load
in the skin is the sternum. (16,30) Measurement of the skin means that transcutaneous
bilirubin is not a reproduction of serum bilirubin but can be used as a screening method; it
helps to make that doubtful decision whether to get a serum bilirubin as well as to indicate
when to worry about a newborn. (21)
Even in neonates with a dark skin the transcutaneous bilirubinometer can be used. (15,33) The
JM-103 has the predominant tendency to overestimate the TcB value in comparison to the
serum bilirubin in black neonates. (30,34) Therefore, the only drawbacks are: the decision to
do a serum bilirubin measurement anyway or an extra follow-up appointment. But more
importantly, it will be unlikely to miss clinically significant hyperbilirubinemia that requires
treatment.
1.5 Treatment of hyperbilirubinemia Established hyperbilirubinemia that exceeds the threshold values will be treated with
phototherapy, whereas severe hyperbilirubinemia will need an exchange transfusion as
7
treatment. The aim of the treatment is to reduce the amount of unconjugated bilirubin and
hereby preventing kernicterus or neurological damage. The thresholds published by the
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) are used to asses if there is need for intervention.
(4,26) In the Netherlands, the NVK guidelines are based upon these AAP guidelines. They
suggest four different hour specific nomograms with their own thresholds for specific
gestational age, birth weight and presence of risk factors.
1.5.1 Phototherapy
Phototherapy converts unconjugated bilirubin into more water soluble substances, which can
be excreted from the body without the necessary conjugation by the liver. Phototherapy is
used in the overwhelming majority of newborns. It uses blue or green light with wavelengths
of 430-490 nm; from lamps, a blanket or both. The neonate should be naked during
phototherapy, except for a diaper and covering of the eyes for protection, to expose as much
skin as possible. During the first 24 hours of phototherapy the bilirubin diminishes with 6% -
20%. (4,9) Combined with phototherapy, hyper hydration is indicated. This means a fluid
supplementation of extra breastfeeding or formula, during phototherapy treatment. It
decreases the rate of exchange transfusions but also the duration of phototherapy. (9,35) Like
any other treatment, there is always a risk of side-effects and complications. Common side-
effects are erythema and dehydration; complications are rare but burn wounds, necrotizing
enterocolitis and retinopathy are reported.
1.5.2 Exchange transfusion
Transfusion is used when phototherapy proofs not to be sufficient or directly in case of severe
hyperbilirubinemia. Transfusion is a much faster intervention to decrease the bilirubin
concentration. During transfusion there will be a replacement of 85% of the neonates’
circulation, with a 50% decrease of bilirubin as a result. But, as can be imagined, it comes
with more risks and more dangerous complications. Complications that are reported vary from
metabolic problems, risks of central venous lines, infections, graft versus host-disease to even
death. (2,36)
1.5.3 Pharmalogical interventions
High dose intravenous immunoglobulin can be used to treat haemolytic diseases of the
newborn, especially the most frequent causes of severe hyperbilirubinemia: rhesus and AB0
blood group incompatibility. (4,9,37) In addition, there are studies that implicate that
metalloporphyrins may reduce high levels of unconjugated bilirubin in jaundiced neonates or
can even prevent the formation of bilirubin. However, more research is needed in this field.
(4,9,38)
1.6 Aim of this study As previously stated in section 1.4, a large number of unnecessary painful heel pricks is
performed to ascertain hyperbilirubinemia. This study aims to improve quality and cost
effectiveness in care of jaundiced newborns by implementing the use of a transcutaneous
bilirubinometer at the children’s ward. A convenient, accurate and non-invasive method
would benefit the neonates and their families, but also the doctors. (30)
This study focuses on the question whether the use of a transcutaneous bilirubinometer in
hospitalized jaundiced neonates leads to reduced number of blood tests, reduced
complications, shorter duration of treatment and hospitalization and reduction of costs.
Compared to the present-day situation relying on visual assessment.
8
2. Methods
2.1 Setting This randomised controlled trial was carried out between February 2014 and June 2015 in
Isala hospital, a large general teaching hospital which is situated in Zwolle, The Netherlands.
This hospital region has a predominantly Caucasian population. Annually, there are over 520
newborns admitted to the medium care and high care unit of the paediatric ward. In 2010,
71% of these 520 newborns had at least one blood sample taken for bilirubin determination,
while in only 16% an intervention for hyperbilirubinemia was instituted. (27)
2.2 Patient population All admitted newborns with gestational age ≥ 32 weeks, older than 24 hours but younger than
≤ 7 days with a clinically, observable jaundiced skin were eligible for this study. Newborns
were excluded when jaundice appeared in the first 24 hours after birth or after one week.
Other reasons for exclusion were: haemolytic diseases of the newborn, clinical kernicterus,
congenital anomaly on the sternum, earlier treatment with phototherapy or if there was
already a blood sample taken for serum bilirubin.
2.3 Transcutaneous bilirubinometry Dräger Konica Minolta Air-Shields Jaundice Meter model 103 (JM-103) was used to obtain
transcutaneous bilirubin measurements, figures 2.1 and 2.2. This device is a validated
measurement instrument. (30,39) It was used by the prescriptions of Dräger and a non-
published validation research at Isala hospital. (27) It is calibrated daily on a measuring
station and its acquisition price was € 5900,00.
Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2
2.4 Study protocol A randomized controlled trial was performed. After written informed consent of the parents
was obtained, eligible neonates were randomised to the intervention group or control group,
as shown in figure 2.3. The intervention existed of transcutaneous measurement of bilirubin,
whereas in the control group neonates received our standard of care, meaning that the
attending physician decided whether serum bilirubin measurement in blood was ordered after
visual assessment. Blood samples were obtained by a peripheral venous heel puncture by the
laboratory staff. The transcutaneous measurement of bilirubin (TcB) was performed by
placing the JM-103 on the sternum to obtain a single TcB measurement, as can be seen in
figure 2.2. International thresholds for phototherapy or exchange therapy were used as
9
Jaundic
ed n
eonate
Randomisation
Intervention
TcB ≤ 50µmol/L below treshold
Serum bilirubin
Treatment
No treatment TcB > 50µmol/L above treshold
Clinical observation
Control
Serum bilirubin
Treatment
No treatment
No serum bilirubin
Clinical observation
Informed consent Yes/No
follows: in every neonate with a TcB value less than 50 µmol/L under the applicable
threshold for phototherapy, a blood sample was taken for serum bilirubin measurement. (4)
(Appendix A) The decision to start phototherapy was based on the serum bilirubin value
according to the international threshold. The 50 µmol/L margin was applied because of a
known unreliability of TcB compared to serum bilirubin. (16,27,30,34) When TcB was higher
than 50 µmol/L above “obtain an SB threshold,” the neonate would receive clinical
observational care. When it was less than 50 µmol/L below treatment threshold, a serum
bilirubin sample was taken.
To safeguard against missing a neonate with significant jaundice, the attending physician
could always have a blood sample for serum bilirubin ordered, despite normal values of TcB.
These ‘escape decisions’ and their outcome were recorded.
Figure 2.3 Study protocol Jaundiced neonate. TcB= transcutaneous bilirubin
2.5 Randomisation, allocation and blinding Randomisation was stratified in three groups according to gestational age: preterm ≥ 32 weeks
and <34 weeks; late preterm ≥ 34 weeks and < 38weeks; full-term ≥ 38 weeks.
Randomisation occurred by computer, using the program Research Manager for Windows. In
this way concealment of allocation was secured.
Given the nature of the intervention, blinding of the intervention was not possible.
2.6 Study approval Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from the parents of the
neonates. The trial protocol and consent forms were approved by the ethics committee of Isala
hospital, METC number NL40354.075.12 (via ccmo.nl) Trial registration number:
NCT01622699 (via ClinicalTrials.gov)
2.7 Measurements of outcome The primary outcome variable of this study is the number of blood samples taken before
eventual treatment, depicted by the number of patients having at least one blood sample taken
for bilirubin measurement and the number of serum bilirubin samples per neonate.
Secondary outcomes are: the highest measured serum bilirubin value and the duration of
phototherapy treatment in hours.
Additional outcome variables are the amount of serum bilirubin values above exchange
transfusion threshold, the number of neonates with clinical kernicterus and the cost evaluation
regarding blood sampling, JM-103 use and hospitalization. Also, the resemblance between
TcB measurement outcome and SB outcome, with neonates for which the ‘escape decision’
of the medical team is used.
10
Finally, agreement between TcB and serum bilirubin values was assessed in a subgroup of
neonates in the intervention group who had TcB ≤ 50µmol/L below the treatment threshold.
2.8 Data collection The general characteristics recorded were: sex, birth weight and whether birth weight was
normal for gestational age or more than ± 2 standard deviation (SD), date and time of birth,
ethnicity limited to Caucasian or Non-Caucasian, and risk factors for hyperbilirubinemia such
as prematurity, (gestational age below 38 weeks), asphyxia (5 minute APGAR below 5 or
umbilical cord pH below 7.0), blood group incompatibility and clinical suspicion for sepsis or
meningitis. Furthermore, any hematomas or a cephalohematoma were registered. The
following suspected causes of hyperbilirubinemia were recorded: prematurity, feeding
problems (exclusive breastfeeding malnutrition), sepsis/infection, haemolysis because of
hematomas or blood group incompatibility, physiological jaundice or other. In addition, the
kind of feeding given until jaundice appeared was recorded: exclusive breastfeeding,
breastfeeding in combination with formula or exclusive formula. Finally, the lowest weight
after birth was registered to determine the total weight loss during hospitalization. If the
weight loss was more than 7%, the cause was administered as feeding problems, while a loss
of or less than 7% was administered as physiological jaundice; if no other obvious cause.
When gestational age was less than 35 weeks the cause of jaundice was registered as
prematurity. It was also registered whether a single sided light therapy by two lamps or
double sided therapy by two lamps and a blanket was used in case of phototherapy treatment.
Finally, the hospital stay was registered in days.
2.9 Sample size and statistical analysis A total sample size of 164 jaundiced neonates is necessary for demonstrating a minimum of
30% reduction in blood sampling, based upon previous research by Mishra et al. and Maisels
et al. (12,15) On the basis of two-sided significance of 5% and a power of 80%, there are 82
neonates needed in each group.
Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 for Windows. Continuous variables
with normal distributions were analysed with the Student’ t-test. When a non-normal
distribution was found, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. For the dichotomous outcome
measures, the Chi-square test was used and in case of small numbers the Fisher’s Exact test.
P-value <0.05 was considered significant. A Bland-Altman plot was made for agreement
between measurements of the JM-103 TcB values and the serum bilirubin values. (40)
11
3. Results
3.1 Patients In this study, 176 jaundiced newborns were included from the neonatal medium care and high
care unit of the paediatric ward. As shown in figure 3.1 below, a total number of 241 neonates
were assessed for eligibility, of which 65 were excluded for various reasons: declined to
participate (n=9), not meeting inclusion criteria (n=27) and 29* had other reasons; of which
eleven could not be randomized due to logistic difficulties (weekends, holidays), nine reasons
were unknown, four were not randomized during a period with the JM-103 being out of order,
three were not included because the attending physician did not want to bother parents of very
ill neonates and two because of a language barrier and parents did not understand the purpose
of the study. One neonate was allocated to the intervention group, but a serum bilirubin
sample was taken instead of a TcB measurement, because of a defect JM-103. This neonate
was analysed in the intervention group according to the intention to treat principle.
Figure 3.1 CONSORT Flow Chart for the implementation of a transcutaneous bilirubinometer.
* Main reasons: could not be randomized due to logistic issues (weekends, holidays) (n=11), unknown (n=9) and the JM-103 being out of
order (n=4) ** Was allocated to intervention group, but no transcutaneous bilirubinometer was used: an SB was obtained.
12
3.2 Characteristics Table 3.1 shows the baseline characteristics that were collected per neonate. Both groups are
equal in baseline characteristics which confirms an adequate randomisation.
Characteristics Intervention
(n = 86)
Control
(n = 90)
Age mother (years) 30±5 30±5
Male gender 49 (57) 50 (55.6)
Gestational age (weeks+days
) 35+3
±2 35+3
±2
<34
≥34 - <38
≥38
19 (22.1)
60 (69.8)
7 (8.1)
19 (21.1)
61 (67.8)
10 (11.1)
Birth weight (grams) 2491±664 2434±499
SGA (<2SD)
AGA
LGA (>2SD)
2 (2.3)
80 (93.0)
4 (4.7)
5 (5.6)
85 (94.4)
0 (0)
Risk factors 82 (95.3) 81 (90)
G.A. <38
Asphyxia
Blood group
incompatibility
Sepsis/meningitis
79 (91.9)
2 (2.3)
0 (0)
5 (5.8)
80 (88.9)
0 (0)
0 (0)
2 (2.2)
Ethnicity
Caucasian
Non-Caucasian
Unknown
77 (89.5)
4 (4.7)
5 (5.8)
78 (86.7)
6 (6.7)
6 (6.7)
Feeding
Only breastfeeding
Only formula
Combination
3 (3.5)
19 (22.1)
64 (74.4)
6 (6.7)
20 (22.2)
64 (71.1)
Weight loss (grams) 4.8±2.7 5.2±3.0
<7%
≥7%
71 (82.6)
15 (17.4)
67 (74.4)
23 (25.6)
Haematomas 11 (12.8) 7 (7.8)
Diagnose
G.A. <35
Feeding problems
Sepsis/infection
Haemolysis
Physiologic
Other
30 (34.9)
13 (15.1)
5 (5.8)
4 (4.7)
34 (39.5)
31 (34.4)
20 (22.2)
0 (0)
1 (1.1)
37 (41.1)
1 (1.1)*
Table 3.1 Data expressed as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation (SD). SGA=small for gestational age, AGA=appropriate for
gestational age, LGA=large for gestational age. G.A.=gestational age in weeks. *Was diagnosed with midgut volvulus.
3.3 Primary outcome variable A total number of 180 TcB measurements (mean 2.1±1.1SD per neonate) was recorded in the
intervention group (n=86). There were two medical charts without the measured TcB values
recorded, however these two neonates had no SB samples taken nor phototherapy treatment
registered; assuming that these TcB measurements were in order. Following these 180 TcB
measurements, 116 SB samples (64.4%) were obtained in conformity with the study protocol.
Twenty-six neonates (30.2%) however, did not need an SB sample taken at all, after the TcB
measurement.
13
In the control group (n=90), 87 neonates (96.7%) had at least one SB sample taken after
visual assessment. A total number of 167 SB samples was taken before potential treatment,
shown in table 3.2.
The number of SB measurements before treatment in the intervention group was significantly
lower compared to the control group with a difference of -0.51 in the number of blood
samples per neonate (95%CI -0.84 - -0.17). With a mean of 1.86 SB measurements in the
control group and a difference of -0.51, there is a significant reduction of 27.4% (95%CI 11.7
- 42.0) in the need for invasive blood sampling in the intervention group.
Intervention
(n=86)
Control
(n=90)
Difference (95% CI) p-Value
Number of SB before phototherapy 116 167 - -
Neonates with minimal one SB sample 60 (69.8) 87 (96.7) 26.9 (11.7 - 42.0) <0.001*
SB samples before phototherapy 1.3±1.3 1.9±1.0 -0.51 (-0.84 - -0.17) 0.003*
Table 3.2 Data expressed as number(%), mean ±SD, CI= confidence interval. *Significant
Figure 3.2 below shows an overview of the number of SB measurements per neonate. As can
be seen, there was also a single neonate that required six SB samples following the study
protocol. This figure clearly illustrates the higher number of SB samples taken in the control
group.
Figure 3.2 Number of SB measurements per neonate. SB=serum bilirubin
14
3.4 Secondary outcome variables 3.4.1 Highest serum bilirubin
The mean highest serum bilirubin in the intervention group was significantly higher with
232.3µmol/L±SD53.3µmol/L, compared to 208.7µmol/L±SD59.9µmol/L in the control
group, with a difference of 23.6µmol/L (95% CI 4.72 - 42.55; p=0.015) as can be seen in table
3.3. There is no obvious reason that could explain why the serum bilirubin was higher in the
intervention group. More importantly this difference is very small and does not seem to be
clinically relevant.
Intervention
(n=86)
Control
(n=90)
Difference (95% CI) p-Value
Highest SB (µmol/L) 232.3±53.3 208.7±59.9 23.6 (4.72 - 42.55) 0.015*
Table 3.3 Data expressed as mean ±SD , CI=confidence interval.*Significant
3.4.2 Phototherapy
Overall, 56 neonates (31.8%) required phototherapy (31/86, 36% in the intervention group
versus 25/90, 27.8% in the control group (difference 8.3; 95% CI 22 - -5.45; p=0.239), see
table 3.4. Most of these treatments were single sided therapy, 74.2% in the intervention group
versus 76% in the control group. The mean age at the start of phototherapy was approximately
3.5 days, while the first measurement, because of visible jaundice, was taken after
approximately 2.5 days. The duration of phototherapy was almost equal in both groups. There
was no difference between the amount of SB samples taken after phototherapy (p=0.362), see
table 3.5. Almost all neonates had at least two SB measurements taken after treatment was
finished, which is usually done to monitor the effect of treatment, the tendency of bilirubin
and to detect rebound hyperbilirubinemia. There was one neonate in both groups without
recorded SB samples after treatment, because of relocation to another hospital during
phototherapy treatment for logistic reasons and no discharge letter with medical information
was send back.
Intervention
(n=86)
Control
(n=90)
Difference (95% CI) p-Value
Phototherapy 31 (36) 25 (27.8) 8.3% (22 - -5.45) 0.239
Age (h) at first measurement 59±20 64±21 4.50 (-10.74 - 1.75) 0.157
Age (h) at the start of phototherapy 83±22 87±26 4 (-16.73 - 8.8) 0.536
Duration of phototherapy (h) 24 [20-44] 24 [22-45] - 0.924
Table 3.4 Data expressed as number (%) , mean ± SD or median and interquartile range [], h=hours, CI=confidence interval.
Intervention
(n=30)
Control
(n=24)
Difference (95% CI) p-Value
Number of SB after phototherapy 2.2±1.7 2.6±1.5 -0.40 (-1.27 - 0.47) 0.362
Table 3.5 Data expressed as mean ±SD, CI=confidence interval.
3.4.3 Additional outcome variables
Table 3.6 below shows an overview of additional outcome variables. Three neonates (3.5%)
had SB values above the exchange transfusion threshold, all in the intervention group. These
neonates were very premature, 32 and 33 weeks of gestational age. Their development
appears to be normal and clinical follow up has been terminated. None of the neonates in both
groups underwent exchange transfusion, because serum bilirubin was below transfusion
threshold after initiating phototherapy before the exchange blood was available. None of all
participating neonates developed a clinical kernicterus or had indicating symptoms. The
15
duration of hospital admission was comparable in both groups. No additional complications
were registered in the medical charts of any of the participating neonates.
Intervention
(n=86)
Control
(n=90)
SB value above transfusion threshold 3 (3.5) 0 (0)
Exchange transfusion 0 (0) 0 (0)
Kernicterus 0 (0) 0 (0)
Duration of hospital admission (days) 13 [6-18] 12 [7-17] Table 3.6 Data expressed as number (%) or median and interquartile range []
3.4.4 Costs
The single costs for an SB sample determination by the laboratory staff is € 8.00. As shown in
figure 3.1 above, 241 neonates were visibly jaundiced during the 17 month study period, of
which 61% had their blood taken at least once. So annually, there are at least 170 jaundiced
neonates at the children’s ward. With a mean of 1.86 SB samples per neonate (table 3.2) there
are annually 316 SB measurements performed. The transcutaneous bilirubinometer reduces
the need for blood sampling by 27.4%. This means that the annual cost reduction, after
implementing the JM-103, will be a minimal of € 693.11. With the JM-103 purchasing price
of € 5,900.00, it will take a maximum of 8.5 years to have a cost recovery. With a functional
depreciation of 10 years for medical devices in the Isala hospital, the JM-103 has its own cost
recovery. (41)
3.4.5 Escape decision
The escape decision was the opportunity for the attending physician to overrule an obtained
TcB value and determine an SB. With two neonates (2.3%) the escape decision was made by
the attending physician. One time this was done because the JM-103 was out of order, so only
an SB sample was measured and no comparison could be made, see figure 3.1; the other time
the reason for obtaining an SB after a normal TcB was not registered in the medical chart.
This latter escape decision had a TcB value of 188 µmol/L and an SB value of 213 µmol/L,
with a difference of 25 µmol/L. These values were below phototherapy threshold, so there
were no clinical consequences in this case and the SB measurement appeared to be
unnecessary. The next day, only the JM-103 was used with this neonate, with no blood
sampling or treatment as a consequence.
3.4.6 Agreement between TcB and serum bilirubin
A Bland-Altman plot, figure 3.3 below, was used for the evaluation of the agreement between
TcB values and SB values recorded with neonates whose SB sample was taken following
study protocol; when the TcB value was less than 50 µmol/L below the phototherapy
threshold. This Bland-Altman plot shows no agreement (p<0.001) between the limits of
agreement with a mean bias of 10.56 µmol/L, with the upper limit of agreement of 72.56
µmol/L and a lower limit of agreement of -51.44 µmol/L. With the lower limit being almost
equal to the clinical margin set at 50 µmol/L.
The total number of combined measurements to compare was 110, while 116 SB samples
were taken. It appeared that in the first phase of the study sometimes, for the second
assessment an SB was taken right away, instead of taking a TcB measurement first. Of these
110 combined measurements, 14 (12.7%) had more than the previously mentioned 50 µmol/L
margin difference between the JM-103 TcB value and SB value, higher or lower. In 11 (10%)
of these 14, the TcB was more than 50 µmol/L higher than the actual SB value, in retrospect
one can judge that blood samples were taken unnecessarily. In the other three samples (2.7%)
the TcB was more than 50 µmol/L lower that the actual SB value, meaning that these
16
neonates in theory could have been missed using only the JM-103. In this study, these three
neonates did get an SB sample, because their TcB value was still in range of the 50 µmol/L
margin. These neonates were all Caucasian, preterm, had feeding problems and had ≥ 7%
weight loss; one was later diagnosed with pyloric hypertrophy. Because their SB value was
above the phototherapy threshold, they all received appropriate treatment and there were no
complications.
Figure 3.3 Bland-Altman plot for the total amount of combined measurements (n=110).
SB= serum bilirubin, JM-103= jaundice meter-103
The JM-103 TcB values in this study were generally more overestimating and in the higher
regions of serum bilirubin values the JM-103 underestimates. There are no factors found to
explain this over- and underestimating.
The mean delay in time between the TcB measurement and the following SB measurement
was 138 minutes±142SD. The time interval between the 14 measurements that differed more
than 50 µmol/L from each other, was not significantly different.
There was also a Bland and Altman comparison made (not shown) between the TcB and SB
measurements of the non-Caucasian neonates and these combined with the neonates whose
ethnicity remained unknown; in case they were all non-Caucasian. As can be seen in table 3.1
above, there are only four neonates who are non-Caucasian in the intervention group. These
neonates together had only five TcB values and SB values to compare. These five had a
significance of p=0.454 which means that there is an agreement between the measurements.
Combined with the neonates whose ethnicity remained unknown, there were ten
measurements to compare of nine neonates. Also, all these measurements were between the
limits of agreement.
17
4. Discussion
4.1 Main findings This study showed a useful way of diminishing unnecessary blood sampling in jaundiced
newborns by using a transcutaneous bilirubinometer compared to the visual assessment of
jaundiced neonates admitted to the neonatal ward. We safely achieved a reduction of 27% in
number of blood tests. The costs for purchasing the bilirubinometer (JM-103) were
compensated by the reduction in costs due to less blood tests. Obtaining a TcB is quick and
easy, and it can be used as many times as desired. One must however always be critical after a
TcB measurement and clinical assessment remains most important.
4.2 Comparison with existing literature Mishra et al. found a reduction of 34% in need for blood sampling, compatible with the 40%
Maisels et al. found, which is slightly more than the 27.4% in this study. (12,15) Although
they only included healthy newborns with gestational age ≥ 35 weeks and we included more
preterm neonates.
Mishra et al. showed a basal rate of 26.4% of SB samples taken after visual assessment, which
is much lower than the 96.7% found in our study. They had the visual assessment done only
by a paediatrician who had a minimum of five years of clinical experience and was trained to
do so following their study protocol related to Kramer’s rule. In our study period, there were
different doctors on the ward, varying from a paediatrician, a resident and a junior resident to
interns. They all rely on their own experience and knowledge, resulting in different ratings of
SB samples taken; which is more reliable to clinical practice. Moreover our study population
yielded hospitalized, sick neonates, in whom the threshold for obtaining an SB on our ward
has been low, for reasons of not wanting to miss a high bilirubin in this vulnerable population.
Our study showed that after the initial assessment of hyperbilirubinemia by transcutaneous
bilirubinometry in 64.4% serum bilirubin was obtained, because the TcB was < 50 µmol/L
below phototherapy threshold. Mishra et al. found only 17.5% in their Indian population
needing an SB after the initial TcB. They used the same margin of 50 µmol/L, but it is not
known if they used the AAP thresholds. However, they included only healthy newborns with
gestational age of ≥ 35 week, whereas we included all neonates ≥32 weeks. It is known that
prematurity is a major risk factor for hyperbilirubinemia. Moreover, the thresholds for
phototherapy in preterm neonates are much lower than in term neonates, due to increased
neurological vulnerability and susceptibility for bilirubin toxicity. Also, they visually
evaluated jaundice every 8 hours, with a TcB measurement followed immediately and
obtained many more TcB measurements this way. In our study a TcB was obtained, only
when visible jaundice occurred. This will have resulted in less SB measurements compared to
TcB, as repeated TcB measurements were only necessary in jaundiced neonates not needing
phototherapy.
While in our study 32% of the neonates underwent phototherapy compared to 7.1% Mishra et
al. found. This may explain the higher rate of SB measurements obtained in our study
population. The 32% found in our study is much higher than the general estimate of the NVK
of 2% - 5% in the Netherlands. (9) This is probably caused by our study population with a
high number of preterm neonates, which are more at risk of developing hyperbilirubinemia. A
few more neonates in the intervention group needed phototherapy however, this fact may
partially account for the higher serum bilirubin that was found in the intervention group. In
both groups the physiology of jaundice appeared to develop normally: almost all neonates
became jaundiced after 48 hours and the peak serum bilirubin appeared to be around the third
day of life, which in 32% led to phototherapy.
18
Results show that after a neonate has had phototherapy, at least two SB measurements
followed. Sometimes when a neonate reaches or exceeds the exchange transfusion threshold,
an SB value is obtained a couple of hours after starting treatment to evaluate the tendency, but
this is also done to make sure a rebound hyperbilirubinemia does not occur after discontinuing
phototherapy. (4,9) However, Yetman et al. and Maisels et al. show that a rebound
hyperbilirubinemia after discontinuing phototherapy is rare in healthy newborns. (42,43)
Highest serum bilirubin
A statistically significant difference of 23.6 µmol/L was found between the mean highest
serum bilirubin in the intervention group and the control group, with a higher serum bilirubin
in the intervention group. These results are contrary to the results of Hartshorn&Buckmaster,
who also recorded the mean highest SB in their study but found no difference. (10) No cause
could be indicated for the difference found in this study. After randomisation, the baseline
characteristics concerning gestational age of feeding problems were not different between the
intervention group and the control group. There were slightly more neonates with hematomas
and asphyxia in the intervention group, with possibly higher serum bilirubin as a
consequence. Another cause that may have affected the serum bilirubin is the fact that there
were more neonates with an infection/sepsis in the intervention group. More importantly, the
difference that was found between the groups’ mean serum bilirubin was only 23.6 µmol/L
therefore, it does not seem to be of major clinical relevance.
Costs
Although decreasing costs was not the main purpose of this study, it is pleasant when a new
intervention in medical care comes with lowering costs instead of increasing them. Our study
showed an annual cost reduction of € 693.11 and a JM-103 cost recovery of 8.5 years.
Hartshorn&Buckmaster however, showed an annual cost reduction of almost $ 7,000, with a
JM-103 cost recovery every 14 months. (10) They perform 1020 SB measurements annually
though, compared to only around 300 SB measurements in the Isala hospital. Maisels et al.
showed back in 1997 a more reliable and comparable cost reduction of $1,625, as they also
took into account the SB measurements that will follow upon a TcB measurement based on
the protocol margin. (12) Currently, our costs for an SB measurement by the laboratory staff
are lower than when the study protocol was incorporated. This may explain why the estimated
time of 8.5 years of cost recovery is higher than assumed in first instance.
After implementing the JM-103, it will no longer be necessary to obtain an SB after every
TcB measurement within the clinical margin, like the six times with the neonate in figure 3.2;
since a neonate follows its own tendency with regard to their own treatment threshold.
Generalizability of the effects on costs are merely dependent on costs for blood sampling and
SB measurement, which may vary largely between different countries and even between
hospitals in the same country.
Agreement between measurements
The agreement between the laboratory measurement and the transcutaneous bilirubinometry
was not optimal, with the limits of agreement being wider than the predetermined clinical
relevant margin set at 50 µmol/L. The mean difference between measurements was a small
bias and the disagreement was merely caused by the TcB being higher than SB measurements.
This implies that we did not miss possible treatment thresholds, but have over-treated some
neonates. Most published Bland-Altman plots show a comparable negligible bias with the JM-
103 values compared to the SB when used at the sternum. (44)
With 10% of the compared measurements, the TcB was more than 50 µmol/L above SB
value, of which the majority of this 10% was still between the limits of agreement. This
19
means that the JM-103 rather overestimates, as already described by Szabo et al. (11)
Although Szabo’s study concerns the previous model of the JM-103, Maisels et al. also
showed an overestimation with the JM-103. (30) It has also been described that the JM-103
overestimates values in the higher range (>250µmol/L), but the data in our study show an
underestimation of 2.7% near the 300µmol/L. This is comparable with the underestimation of
2.2% which Taylor et al. found. (45) Other authors suggest obtaining an SB with TcB values
higher than 250 µmol/L. (7) The TcB values of these neonates in our study however, were
within the 50 µmol/L margin so they did get an SB sample taken and received necessary
treatment.
What stands out in our study was the long time of two hours passed between the JM-103
measurement and the following SB sample taken. In most other studies, the time between
measurements was at most 60 minutes and often measurements were taken approximately at
the same time. (44) Although, the comparison between methods was not the aim of this study
though, this study reveals the actual clinical practice and it shows that a lot of time passes
between measurements in clinical practice. As a consequence, one could expect our SB values
turn out to be much higher than the TcB values, but this did not occur. This means that the
two hour interval found in this study may be accepted in clinical practice, but is not desirable.
The population of Isala hospital appears to be predominantly Caucasian. The Bland and
Altman comparison that was made between the non-Caucasian newborns however, could not
have been fully interpreted, because of the low number of measurements to compare.
However, the overestimation of TcB in non-Caucasian neonates that was described by
Maisels et al. was not found. (30) Our study is consistent with the findings of Afanetti et al.
that skin colour does not influence the transcutaneous bilirubinometer. (33)
Escape decision
In our study, one neonate (1.2%) had an SB sample taken after a TcB measurement that did
not commend to obtain an SB and without reason registered in the medical chart. There were
also no clinical consequences because of this SB value. It appears that the medical staff felt
confident to rely on the obtained values of TcB measurements. Beforehand, a higher number
of times that the escape decision may have been made was anticipated, compatible with the
study of Hartshorn&Buckmaster where in 22 cases (1.8%) the escape decision was made. (10)
This is approximately identical to the 1.6% that Mishra et al. found. (15)
4.3 Study limitations and strengths A major strength of this study is the fact that to the best of our knowledge this is the first
randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands for implementing a transcutaneous
bilirubinometer for use at the children’s ward, that includes full-term and preterm neonates.
Our study design was rigorous and we used a large enough sample size for the results to be
conclusive for our study population.
A limitation might be that we found that a lot of different doctors during the study made the
decision whether to obtain an SB in the control group, while in other studies only a
paediatrician or a trained ward nurse performed visual assessment.
Another limitation might be that in the intervention group there was no option to do a visual
assessment only and to decide not to obtain a TcB value on the basis thereof. Instead, with
every jaundiced newborn in the intervention group the JM-103 was used, while in practice not
every jaundiced newborn needs an actual value of bilirubin, whether transcutaneous or
through blood sample.
20
4.4 Future research and recommendations In the search for diminishing invasive blood sampling methods with a very vulnerable patient
population, research of extended use of a transcutaneous bilirubinometer should continue.
Decreasing the number of blood samples before phototherapy raises the question of whether it
is also possible to use a transcutaneous bilirubinometer during and after phototherapy. Several
positive studies have been published in this regard (46-48) and there is an ongoing debate
about the best TcB measuring place for very preterm neonates. (49) Also, we think that with
improving accuracy of the bilirubinometer, or by accepting a lower margin from the treatment
threshold, we can further lower the number of infants needing a heel puncture, without
compromising safety. Next to this it would be interesting to research the use of a
transcutaneous bilirubinometer with other populations, as NICU departments, well-born units,
out hospital patients and more non-Caucasian newborns. These questions may all be
answered, but all need additional research.
TcB measurements work well in hospitalized newborns and are better than visual estimation
of SB, notwithstanding that one must keep in mind that the JM-103 gives a transcutaneous
value and not a serum value of bilirubin. This means: with the NVK guidelines and AAP
thresholds with a margin of 50 µmol/L a reliable nomogram for the Isala hospital is obtained
and the use of the JM-103 is recommended. (4,44)
5. Conclusion
The aim of this study was to find out whether the use of a transcutaneous bilirubinometer in
hospitalized jaundiced neonates would lead to a reduction of blood tests. This study shows
that the implementation of the JM-103 in the Isala hospital significantly reduces the number
of painful and invasive blood tests with 27% compared to the present-day situation of relying
on visual assessment; without increasing the risk of missing neonates who are at risk of
kernicterus. Furthermore, this study showed no difference in duration of treatment nor
hospitalization length. As for the costs of implementing the JM-103, the true value of the JM-
103 is not related to the purchasing price: it pays itself back in higher quality of patient care,
lower risks and less inconvenience for newborns and their families in the Isala hospital.
The JM-103 is a useful screening tool for obtaining a bilirubin value and with the 50 µmol/L
margin on the nomograms of the AAP, it is a safe manner to reduce blood sampling.
However, while taking into account a TcB value, clinical assessment remains most important.
We advise the use of a transcutaneous bilirubinometer in hospitalised jaundiced newborns.
21
6. References
(1) Provisional Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia.
Practice Parameter: Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Healthy Term Newborn.
Pediatrics 1994 October 01;94(4):558-565.
(2) McIntosh N, Helms P, Smyth R, Logan S. Forfar & Arneil's Textbook of Pediatrics. 7th
ed. Churchill Livingston: Elsevier; 2008.
(3) Stevenson DK, Vreman HJ, Wong RJ. Bilirubin Production and the Risk of Bilirubin
Neurotoxicity. Semin Perinatol 2011 6;35(3):121-126.
(4) Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the
Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics 2004 July 01;114(1):297-316.
(5) Keren R, Tremont K, Luan X, Cnaan A. Visual assessment of jaundice in term and late
preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009 Sep;94(5):F317-22.
(6) Moyer VA, Ahn C, Sneed S. Accuracy of clinical judgment in neonatal jaundice. Arch
Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154(4):391-394.
(7) Szabo P, Wolf M, Bucher HU, Fauchere JC, Haensse D, Arlettaz R. Detection of
hyperbilirubinaemia in jaundiced full-term neonates by eye or by bilirubinometer? European
Journal of Pediatrics 2004;163:722-727.
(8) Van den Brande JL, Derksen-Lubsen G, Heymans HSA, Kollée LAA(). Leerboek
Kindergeneeskunde. Een interactieve benadering in woord en beeld. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.;
2009.
(9) Dijk, P.H., Vries, de T.W., Beer, de J.J. (Nederlandse Vereniging Kindergeneeskunde).
Richtlijn Preventie, diagnose en behandeling van Hyperbilirubinemie in de pasgeborene met
een zwangerschapsduur van 35 weken of meer. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
2008;153(A93).
(10) Hartshorn D, Buckmaster A. ‘Halving the heel pricks’: Evaluation of a neonatal jaundice
protocol incorporating the use of a transcutaneous bilirubinometer. Journal of Paediatrics and
Child Health 2010;46:595-599.
(11) Szabo P, Wolf M, Bucher HU, Haensse D, Fauchere JC, Arlettaz R. Assessment of
Jaundice in Preterm neonate: comparison between clinical assessment, two transcutaneous
bilriubinometers and serum bilirubin values. Acta Pædiatrica 2004;93:1491-1495.
(12) Maisels MJ, Kring E. Transcutaneous Bilirubinometry Decreases the Need for Serum
Bilirubin Measurements and Saves Money. Pediatrics 1997;99(4):599-600.
(13) Maisels MJ. Transcutaneous Bilirubin Measurement: Does It Work in the Real World?
Pediatrics 2015 February 01;135(2):364-366.
22
(14) Engle WD, Jackson GL, Stehel EK, Sendelbach DM, Manning MD. Evaluation of a
transcutaneous jaundice meter following hospital discharge in term and near-term neonates. J
Perinatol 2005 Jul;25(7):486-490.
(15) Mishra S, Chawla D, Agarwal R, Deorari A, Paul V, Bhutani V. Transcutaneous
bilirubinometry reduces the need for blood sampling in neonates with visible jaundice. Acta
Pædiatrica 2009;98(12):1916-1919.
(16) Willemsen MJ, Korver CRW. Transcutane bilirubinemeting geschikt voor de vaststelling
van hyperbilirubinemie bij icterische pasgeborenen. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
2007;151:359-363.
(17) Schwartz HP, Haberman BE, Ruddy RM. Hyperbilirubinemia: current guidelines and
emerging therapies. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011;Sep(27(9)):884-9.
(18) Shapiro SM. Bilirubin toxicity in the developing nervous system. Pediatr Neurol 2003
11;29(5):410-421.
(19) Shapiro SM. Definition of the Clinical Spectrum of Kernicterus and Bilirubin-Induced
Neurologic Dysfunction (BIND). Journal of Perinatology 2005;25:54-59.
(20) Maisels MJ. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and kernicterus — Not gone but sometimes
forgotten. Early Human Development 2009 11;85(11):727-732.
(21) Maisels MJ. Managing the jaundiced newborn: a persistent challenge. Canadian Medical
Association Journal 2015;187(5):335-343.
(22) Gotink MJ, Benders MJ, Lavrijsen SW, Rodrigues Pereira R, Hulzebos CV, Dijk PH.
Severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in the Netherlands. Neonatology 2013;104(2):137-142.
(23) Yamanouchi I, Yamauchi Y, Igarashi I. Transcutaneous Bilirubinometry: Preliminary
Studies of Noninvasive Transcutaneous Bilirubin Meter in the Okayama National Hospital.
Pediatrics 1980 February 01;65(2):195-202.
(24) Briscoe L, Clark S, Yoxall CW. Can transcutaneous bilirubinometry reduce the need for
blood tests in jaundiced full term babies? Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and
Neonatal Edition 2002 May 01;86(3):F190-F192.
(25) Kramer LI. Advancement of dermal icterus in the jaundiced newborn. American Journal
of Diseases of Children 1969 September 1;118(3):454-458.
(26) Webster J, Blyth R, Nugent F. An appraisal of the use of the Kramer's scale in predicting
hyperbilirubinaemia in healthy full term infants. Birth Issues 2005;14(3):83-89.
(27) Van den Esker B. Best practice MANP: “Geel = prikken of toch niet?” Juni 2011
Manuscript available with the author.
(28) Yap SH, Mohammad I, Ryan CA. Avoiding painful blood sampling in neonates by
transcutaneous bilirubinometry. Irish Journal of Medical Science 2002 Oct-Dec;171(4):188-
190.
23
(29) Lilien LD, Harris VJ, Ramamurthy RS, Pildes RS. Neonatal osteomyelitis of the
calcaneus: Complication of heel puncture. Pediatrics 1976 3;88(3):478-480.
(30) Maisels MJ, Ostrea EM, Touch S, Clune SE, Cepeda E, Kring E, et al. Evaluation of a
New Transcutaneous Bilirubinometer. Pediatrics 2004;113(6):1628-1635.
(31) De Luca D, Zecca E, De Turris P, Barbato G, Marras M, Romagnoli C. Using Bilicheck
TM for preterm neonates in a sub-intensive unit: Diagnostic usefulness and suitability. Early
Human Development 2007;83:313-317.
(32) Holland L, Blick K. Implementing and Validating Transcutaneous Bilirubinometry for
Neonates. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2009;132(4):555-561.
(33) Afanetti M, Eleni dit Trolli S, Yousef N, Jrad I, Mokhtari M. Transcutaneous
bilirubinometry is not influenced by term or skin color in neonates. Early Human
Development 2014 8;90(8):417-420.
(34) Wainer S, Rabi Y, Parmar SM, Allegro D, Lyon M. Impact of skin tone on the
performance of a transcutaneous jaundice meter. Acta Paediatrica 2009 Dec;98(12):1909-
1915.
(35) Mehta S, Kumar P, Narang A. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluid Supplementation
in Term Neonates With Severe Hyperbilirubinemia. J Pediatr 2005 12;147(6):781-785.
(36) Ip S, Chung M, Kulig J, O'Brien R, Sege R, Glicken S, et al. An evidence-based review
of important issues concerning neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics 2004 Jul;114(1):e130-
53.
(37) Gottstein R, Cooke RWI. Systematic review of intravenous immunoglobulin in
haemolytic disease of the newborn. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal
Edition 2003 January 01;88(1):6-10.
(38) Suresh G, Martin CL, Soll R. Metalloporphyrins for treatment of unconjugated
hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003(2).
(39) Bental YA, Shiff Y, Dorsht N, Litig E, Tuval L, Mimouni FB. Bhutani-based
nomograms for the prediction of significant hyperbilirubinaemia using transcutaneous
measurements of bilirubin. Acta Paediatr 2009 Dec;98(12):1902-1908.
(40) Bland MJ, Altman DG. Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between two
Methods of Clinical Measurement. The Lancet 1986 2/8;327(8476):307-310.
(41) Poot L. Terzake deskundige Medisch Equipment. Isala hospital, Zwolle. Consulted
September 2015
(42) Yetman RJ, Parks DK, Huseby V, Mistry K, Garcia J. Rebound bilirubin levels in infants
receiving phototherapy. The Journal of Pediatrics 1998 11;133(5):705-707.
(43) Maisels MJ, Kring E. Rebound in Serum Bilirubin Level Following Intensive
Phototherapy. JAMA Pediatrics 2002;156(7):669-672.
24
(44) Nagar G, Vandermeer B, Campbell S, Kumar M. Reliability of Transcutaneous Bilirubin
Devices in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2013;132(5):871-881.
(45) Taylor JA, Burgos AE, Flaherman V, Chung EK, Simpson EA, Goyal NK, et al.
Discrepancies Between Transcutaneous and Serum Bilirubin Measurements. Pediatrics 2015
February 01;135(2):224-231.
(46) Grabenhenrich J, Grabenhenrich L, Buhrer C, Berns M. Transcutaneous bilirubin after
phototherapy in term and preterm infants. Pediatrics 2014 Nov;134(5):e1324-9.
(47) Juster-Reicher A, Flidel-Rimon O, Rozin I, Shinwell ES. Correlation of transcutaneous
bilirubinometry (TcB) and total serum bilirubin (TsB) levels after phototherapy. J Matern
Fetal Neonatal Med 2014 Sep 30:1-3.
(48) Tan KL, Dong F. Transcutaneous bilirubinometry during and after phototherapy. Acta
Paediatrica 2003;92(3):327-331.
(49) Yaser A, Tooke L, Rhoda N. Interscapular site for transcutaneous bilirubin measurement
in preterm infants: a better and safer screening site. Journal of Perinatology 2014
Mar;34(3):209-212.
25
7. Appendix A
The curves below are the ones that were used during the study period. Based upon the
treatment thresholds from the AAP and NVK guidelines with a 50 µmol/L margin. (4,9,27)
Bilirubin curves of ≥ 35 weeks of gestational age with normal birth weight.
26
Bilirubin curve of < 35 weeks of gestational age with birth weight > 2000 grams.
References
(1) Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or
More Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics 2004 July 01;114(1):297-316.
(2) Dijk, P.H., Vries, de T.W., Beer, de J.J. (Nederlandse Vereniging Kindergeneeskunde). Richtlijn
Preventie, diagnose en behandeling van Hyperbilirubinemie in de pasgeborene met een zwangerschapsduur
van 35 weken of meer. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2008;153(A93).
(3) Van den Esker B. Best practice MANP: “Geel = prikken of toch niet?” Juni 2011, Manuscript available
with the author.