in this issueowners of distressed properties often have obtained zoning or site plan approvals based...
TRANSCRIPT
Hill International, Inc.’s Claims & Consulting Group produces this newsletter to create a forum which addresses key issues related to the construction industry. The information contained herein is for general informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. This information cannot be applied to specific facts and circumstances without the advice of legal counsel.
Legal Issues Involving Distressed Properties
In this Issue:
• LegalIssuesInvolvingDistressedProperties
• DistressedAssetsandtheHospitalityIndustryUpdatein2010:We’renotoutofthewoods,yet…
• StopNoticeRisksforConstructionLenders
• RiskManagementandtheDistressedProperty
James J. Sienicki, Partner, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Intoday’srealestateclimate,manycommercialtransactionsinvolvepropertythatissubjecttoforeclosure,loandefault,bankruptcy,litigation,propertyvaluedecline,tenantproblemsorhasexperiencedothersignificantdifficulties.Whendealingwithdistressedproperty,partiesmustbeawareofcertainissuesandpossiblepitfallsthatmaynotariseinnormaltransactions.Thisarticlewilldiscusssomebasicconsiderationsthatpartiesshouldconsiderwhenpurchasingdistressedpropertyorinconnectionwithreceivershipandworkoutsituations.
F I v e I s s u es Fo r Pa rt I es Co n s I D e r I n g t h e aCq u I s I t I o n s o F D I st r es s e D P ro P e rt y
1. normal Due Diligence activities:
Inanyrealestateacquisition,duediligenceplaysavitalrole.Thoroughduediligenceisevenmoreimportantwhenpurchasingdistressedproperty.Acompleteinvestigationofthestatusofthepropertyiscriticaltoprotectthebuyerfromunknownrisks,buttheissuesandproblemsascertainedcanalsobeusedtonegotiatealowerpurchaseprice.Normalactivitiesincludethefollowing:
a. Building Inspection:
Ifthepropertyhasbeenneglectedduetoabandonmentorinabilitytopayfornormalmaintenanceandrepairs,aproperbuildinginspectionwillhelpdisclosetheseitemsandidentifyfutureexpensesnotfactoredintooriginalvaluations.
2
b. title review:
Whenconductingtitlereview,thebuyershouldpayspecialattentiontoanydevelopmentagreements,CC&Rsorsimilarencumbrancesthatimposeassessments,developmentrestrictions,timelinesforconstruction,etc.Theowner,duetofinancialinabilityorotherconstraints,mayhavefailedtocomply.Ifso,suchfailurecouldresultinsignificantcosts,potentiallitigationand/orhaveanadverseimpactontheviabilityofthebuyer’splanneddevelopmentoruseoftheproperty.
c. tenants:
Itisimperativetoreviewthetermsofallleases,operatingcontractsandsimilardocuments.Thelengthoftheleasesandviabilityofeachtenantshouldbecloselyscrutinized.Leasedefaultsandleaseexpirations(thatcannotbeimmediatelyrenewed)willhaveadramaticimpactonthevalueoftheproperty.Tenantestoppelcertificatesshouldbeobtainedfromeachtenantwherebythetenantsandtheexistingownercertifythetermsoftheleasesandthattheinstrumentsareinfullforceandeffectwithoutexistingorpotentialdefaults.Theleasesshouldbescouredthoroughlyforanytermsandconditionsthatwouldgivethetenantsanexitrightorabilitytoreducerent.Forinstance,aco-tenancyclausemayallowaretailtenanttoreducerentorterminatealeasewhenananchortenantleavestheproperty.
d. other standard Due Dilligence:
Ofcourse,anALTAsurvey,PhaseIenvironmentalsiteassessmentandotherstandardduediligenceactivitiesshouldalsobeconsidered.
2. existing and Potential Claims and Disputes:
Thebuyershouldaskitslawyeroraconsultanttoconductalitigationsearchandhavethesellertodiscloseallexistingandpotentialclaimsanddisputes.Thelawyermaywishtoconsultwithknowledgeableattorneysregardingrealestate,environmentalandbankruptcyissuesthatexistormayarise.Inmanydistressedpropertycases,theownernotonlyhasproblemswithitslender,butpossiblelitigationmaybeloomingbetweentheinvestors,partnersandmemberscomprisingtheownershipitself.Bewareofsituationswheretheowner’sprospectivedevelopmentoroperationswerefundedbypassiveinvestorswhoarenowdisgruntled.
3. Zoning Issues:
Abuyertypicallyshouldconductathoroughinvestigationofthecurrentzoningandlanduseoftheproperty,includinganypendingapprovalsoroutstandingzoningorsiteplanstipulations.
Ownersofdistressedpropertiesoftenhaveobtainedzoningorsiteplanapprovalsbasedonspecificstipulationsthatmustbefulfilled.Someofthesestipulationsmayhavetimerestrictionsandthesetimerestrictionsmaynothavebeenmet.Failuretoconformtothesestipulationswithintherequiredtimecouldcausetheentitlementstolapse.Ifthebuyerfailstoadequatelyinvestigatethelanduseandzoningrequirementsoftheproperty,thebuyermayfinditselfinapositionwheretherecentlyacquiredpropertyisunusableforitsprospectiveuse.
4. valuations:
Thebuyershouldstronglyconsiderobtainingmultipleappraisalsand/orprofessionalopinionswithrespecttothevaluationoftheproperty.Accuratevaluationsareverydifficultinthecurrenteconomicmarketasthereislittleinthewayoftruearm’slengthtransactions.Byobtainingmultipleappraisals,abuyercanobtainabetterunderstandingofthefairmarketvalue.
5. surrounding Development:
Determinewhetheralloff-siteimprovementsandinfrastructureservingthedevelopmenthavebeencompleted.Inmanycases,buyersacquirepropertyonlytolearnthatthemasterdeveloperisunabletocompleteroads,utilitiesorotherimprovementsthatarenecessaryinorderforthepropertyownertoobtainbuildingimprovementsandbuildingpermitsforitsparcel.Ifthereisuncompletedinfrastructureorimprovements,thebuyershouldconsiderdemandingahold-backofthepurchasepriceorothersecuritytoensurethatallimprovementsaremade.
3
Whenbuyingaparcelwithinalargerdevelopment,thebuyershoulddeterminewhetherthecenterisviableandwhetherassessmentsfromtheotheroccupantsarecurrent.Ifthecenterisnotbeingmaintained,thiscangreatlyimpacttheviabilityofthecenterandvalueofthepropertybeingpurchased.
Wo r ko u t ag r e e m e n ts
Decreasedpropertyvaluesandthelackofwillingpurchasershavemadeforeclosureaveryunattractiveoptionformanylendersintoday’smarket.Becauseofthecurrenteconomicconditions,manylendersprefertoprovideloanextensionsinhopesofreceivingsomerepaymentandeventuallybenefitingfromafutureeconomicturnaround.Itisforthesereasonsthatworkoutagreementshavebecomeasoughtafteralternativeformanylenders.
Workoutsareagreementsbetweendefaultingpartiesandthepartiestowhomtheyoweobligationsthatprovideforpaymentoftheobligation,whileaffordingthedefaultingpartytheopportunitytobenefitfromthevalueoftheproject.Sincemostrealestateprojectsareownedbysingleassetentities,anysecurityorassurancethelenderorlandlordwoulddemandintheeventofdefaultisusuallynotavailable.Thedemanditselfmayincreasethelikelihoodofbankruptcy,whichisanunpalatableriskformostlendersorlandlords.Therefore,thelandlordandlenderwillsometimesseeksomekindofresolution,knownasaworkout.
Commontypesofworkoutsinclude:(i)loanorleaserenegotiation;(ii)redesignprojectstoamoremanageablesize;(iii)forloans,alloraportionofthepropertycouldbesoldorrefinancedwhilethelenderforebearsallorpartoftheregularpayments;(iv)borrowerortenantcouldberecapitalizedwithanewpartnercontributingadditionalequityandpossiblyexpertisewhichreducesrisktothelender;(v)deedinlieuofforeclosureinreturnforreleasingborrowerorguarantor;and(vi)terminationofleaseinexchangeforapaymentbythetenant.
Whatevertypeofworkoutisperformed,itisimportantthatthelenderrequirethedistressedpartytofullydiscloseitsfinancialcondition,bothatthetimetheagreementisexecutedandonacontinuingbasisduringthetermoftheworkout.Alendershouldtypicallyhavetheborrowerortenantwaiveanyclaimsagainstthelenderorlandlord,andtheconsiderationfortheaccommodationsmadetothedistressedpartyshouldbeclearlyexplained.Partiesshouldaffirmthetermsoftheoriginalagreement.Unlikenormaltransactions,ifthenegotiationsconcerningtheworkoutfail,thepartiesusuallycannotsimplywalkawayfromeachother;litigationwillbeaprobableoutcome.Therefore,lendersareincreasinglywearyofworkoutsbecause,iftheattemptedworkoutfails,thelenderfacestheprospectofclaimsbeingbroughtbytheborrower.Onemethodoflimitingalender’sriskofpotentialliabilityisthroughapre-workoutagreement.
P r e-Wo r ko u t ag r e e m e n ts
Apre-workoutagreementcanincreasethelikelihoodofsuccessfulnegotiationsandlimittheparties’liabilitiesasitsetstheparametersofthenegotiationsandhelpspreventmisunderstandings.
Theagreementshouldspecifytheintentionsofthepartiesintheirattempttoagreeontermsforrestructuringtheloan.Itisimportantthattheagreementprovideastatementallowinganypartytoterminatenegotiationswithoutriskofliability.Alendershouldinsistthatthepre-workoutagreementmandatethattheborrowercontinuetopursueotherprospectsduringthenegotiation,asthenegotiationsmaynotendinanagreement.
Apoorlydraftedpre-workoutagreement,orevenworsenoagreementatall,putsthelenderatriskthatitsstatementswillbeunderstood(oratleastarguedbytheborrowertobe)defaultwaiversoracceptanceoftherestructuringterms.Therefore,fromthelender’sperspective,thepre-workoutagreementshouldexplicitlyrequirethatanyagreementresultingfromthenegotiationsbeinwritingandsignedbybothparties.Thisshouldhelppreventtheborrowerfromclaimingthatduringthenegotiationsthelenderorallyagreedtocertaintermsorwaivedvariousremedies.
Althoughapre-workoutagreementisnotalwaysnecessary,itisimportanttoconsidertheoverallnegotiationsandwhatleverageapre-workoutagreementmayprovide.Inmanysituations,apre-workoutagreementcanserveasameanstolimitlenderliabilityduringattemptstoworkoutaloan.
4
r eC e I v e rs h I P s
Lendersneedtobeawarethattakingtitletodistressedpropertythroughadeedinlieuofforeclosurewillcausethelendertotakethepropertysubjecttootherexistingliens,includingmechanics’liens.Lendersalsoneedtobeawarethattakingtitletodistressedpropertythroughforeclosuremaycausethelendertotakeonunknownliabilitiesthatareassociatedwiththeproperty.Theliabilitiesgreatlyincreaseifthedistressedpropertyisinaconstructionphaseasthelenderwillneedtodecidewhetherornottocompleteconstruction.Alenderwillwanttoconsidertheappointmentofareceivertoreduceexposureandpreservethecollateral.Whenapartyininterestinanassetdemonstratesthatthepropertyisinneedofprotectionorpreservation,acourtmayappointareceivertotakecontrolofthepropertyandadministertheproperty,regardlessofwhetherornotthedebtorispresentinthejurisdictionorgivesconsenttothereceivership.Thereceiver(whoisappointedbythecourtandthereforehasquasi-judicialimmunity)willinsulatethelenderfromliabilityasitwillallowthelendertodelaytakingtitletotheproperty.Additionally,thereceiverwillassumedailymanagementandoperationactivitiessuchasthecollectionofrentsandpropertymanagement.
Theappointmentofareceiverwillnotinvalidateamechanic’slien.Rather,thereceivertakesthepropertysubjecttoallvalidliens,properties,andencumbrances.1ClarkonReceivers§272(1959).However,itisimportanttonotethatalthoughtheappointmentofareceiverdoesnotinvalidateamechanic’slien,shouldthereceivergetauthoritytoborrowmoneyduringitscontrol,thatnewloanmaybeconsideredahigherprioritythananypreviouslyacquiredmechanic’slien.
Askingacourttoappointareceiverwilllikelysavethelendertimeandmoneyasitwillallowthelendertofocusprimarilyontheirareaofexpertise.Further,areceivermayincreasethevalueofthepropertyasthereceiverwillcollectrents,payformaintenanceandimprovementsandpreventdecayoftheproperty.Mostimportantly,thereceiverwilllikelyprotectthelenderfromliabilitiesandobligationsassociatedwithtakingtitletotheproperty.
Thisarticleonlyprovidesabriefoverviewoftheissuestoconsiderwhenacquiringdistressedpropertyandthebasicelementsofreceiverships,workoutandpre-workoutagreements.Intoday’smarkettherearemanyopportunitiesinvolvingundervaluedland,butpartiesmustbeawarethatdistressedpropertycarriesmanypotentialproblemsthatarenotfoundinnormaltransactions.Therefore,anyoneinterestedinadealinvolvingdistressedpropertyshouldconsultanexperiencedrealestateattorneythatdealswithdistressedproperty,alongwithexperiencedenvironmentalandbankruptcyattorneysifappropriate.
James J. Sienicki 602.382.6351 [email protected]
Jim Sienicki is a partner with Snell & Wilmer in Phoenix, Arizona, where he is the head of the firm’s construction practice group. His practice has been concentrated on a wide variety of construction matters since 1983. Jim is a member of many construction trade associations.
Contributing writers in this article include Jonathan E. Frank, Partner Snell & Wilmer and Byron Sarhangian, Associate Snell & Wilmer
5
Dr. Donald W. Wise Global Hospitality Industry, Managing Partner Johnson Capital Hospitality and Leisure Real Estate Investment Banking
Thesentimentsgoingthrougheachofourmindsaswebid2009a“goodriddance”andtrekcautiouslyandmorehopefullyinto2010,emulateFranklinRoosevelt’sfamousquote:“Wehavenothingtofearbutfearitself.”
Inresponsetothedepressedstateoftherealestateandcapitalmarkets,largeamountsofcapitalarenowchasingopportunitiestopurchasedefaultedhotels,aswellashotelrealestateloansatadiscount.Notsincethesavingsandloancrisisinthelate1980’shasthemarketexpectedacomparablevolumeofdistressedhotelstobesold.Forsavvybuyers,thisisachancetoearnenviablereturns.
“this is like deja vu all over again.” – yogi Berra
Between1989andmid-1995,theResolutionTrustCorporation(RTC)closedorotherwiseresolved747thriftswithtotalassetsof$394billion.Whenaskedaboutwhatisthemostexcitingcomponentof2010-AndrewSegal,presidentofBoxerPropertyinHoustonsaiditwell:“Unprecedentedlowpricedbuyingopportunities.”Whenaskedaboutwhatarethebiggestworriesof2010:“Unprecedentedlowpricedsellingopportunities.”
t h e stat e o F t h e m a r k e t
Bloomberg:“LuxuryHotelSalesMayIncreasein2010asPropertyValuesDrop”.LuxuryhotelswillbeamongU.S.lodgingindustry’smosttradedrealestatenextyearasbuyersgoafterhigh-endpropertiesthathaveslumpedinvalue,”saidArthurAdler,chiefexecutiveofficerfortheAmericasatJonesLangLaSalleHotels.“Theluxuryhotelsectorisamongthetopactivesectorsbecausetherearemorechallenges…Luxuryhotelshavesufferedthemost.Thepossiblediscounts,ifpropertiescometomarketandtrade,willbegreaterinthissectorthaninothers.”
Reuters:“Globalhoteldealstorise40percentin2010”.Globalhoteltransactionsareforecasttoreboundbyupto40percentin2010,boostedbyAsianandMiddleEasterninvestors,aftersalesvolumesplungedtoadecadelowthisyear.Between$11billionand$13billionworthofhotelsareexpectedtochangehandsnextyear,recoveringfromthemarket’s64percentyear-on-yeardeclineof$9billionin2009,investmentservicesfirmJonesLangLaSalleHotelssaid.”
“you’ve got to be very careful if you don’t know where you’re going, because you might not get there.” – yogi Berra
Previously,duringtheRTCdebacleinthe‘90’s,atleasttherewassomecapitalavailable.Thistimelackofcapitalistheproblem.Weareseeinglenderscautiouslygettingbackintothemarket,butatdebtcoverageratiosatmorehistoriclevels.InterestratesarepeggedtoPrimeversusLIBORthatbetterreflecttheriskoftheseinvestments.Overtheyears,thebenchmarkDCRorDebtCoverageRatio(thedebtcoverageratioiscalculatedbydividingtheNetOperatingIncome(NOI)byaproperty’sannualdebtservice.Annualdebtserviceequalstheannualtotalofallinterestandprincipalpaidforallloansonaproperty.Adebtcoverageratiooflessthan1.0indicatesthattheincomegeneratedbyapropertyisinsufficienttocoverthemortgagepaymentsandoperatingexpenses.)Forhospitalityproperties,DCRhashistoricallybeenapproximately1.40.Whenwelookatupcomingcommercialmortgage-backedsecurities(CMBS)andotherloansrollingover,thereisa“highwatermark”basedonrealtimestressedoccupanciesandADR’s(averagedailyrate)–inotherwords,howmanypropertiestodayareachievingthatDCR?
PertheUrbanLandInstitute’sDecember2009newsletter,hoteloccupancyrates(amoving12-monthaverage)stoodat58.7percentinthird-quarter2009,downfrom60percentinthefirstquarterof2009,and680basispoints
Distressed assets and the hospitality Industry update in 2010: We’re not out of the woods, yet…
6
belowthesamequarterayearago.Completionswereupslightlyasapercentageofrooms,from2.6percentinthird-quarter2008to3.2percent.Revenueperavailableroom(RevPAR)fellinthethirdquarterof2009comparedtothesamequarterayearago,offby23.1percent.
AccordingtoPKFHospitalityResearch’s(PKF-HR)December2009report:“Theyear2010willcontinuetobeatoughoneforU.S.hotelownersandoperators.PKF-HRisforecastingthat,onaverage,propertieswillcontinuetosufferyear-over-yeardeclinesinrevenueandprofitsfromanalreadydismal2009.However,giventhedecelerationofroomratediscountingobservedduringthethirdquarterof2009,theseverityofthelossesincurredin2009and2010willbelessthanpreviouslyforecast.Inaddition,year-over-yeargrowthinimportantmeasurements,suchasoccupancy,RevPAR,anddemand,willberealizedafullquarterearlierthanthoughtthreemonthsago.
“Accordingly,thisyear’sannualADRforecasthasbeenreducedtoadeclineof8.8percent,andthe2010ADRforecastisnowaminus1.5percent.Thesecomparetodeclinesof10.4percentand3.1percentthatweforecastlastquarter.
“ThesteepdeclinesinRevPARandtheresultinghistoriccontractioninNetOperatingIncomeatthepropertylevelhaveseverelyunderminedtheabilityofmanyownerstomeettheirdebtserviceobligations.Thisdifficultyhasbeencompoundedbytheeconomicrealitythatmanyhotelsthatareservingasthesolesourceofcollateralforthemortgageholdersoftheseassetsarenolongerworththefaceamountofthedebt.DatafromTreppLLCillustrateshowrapidlythissituationhasdeteriorated.AtthebeginningofthefinancialpanicinSeptember2008,only0.55percentoftheroughly3,700CMBShotelloanswereinsomeformofdelinquencyordefault.ByJuneof2009,thisnumberhadincreasedto4.31percent.AsofDecember10,2009,thevolumeofnon-performingCMBShotelloanshadsky-rocketedto13.47percent.”
AccordingtoMoody’sInvestorsService:“Althoughthepaceofdeclinehascontinuedtoslowinrecentmonths,commercialpropertypriceshavefallennearly44%sincetheirpeaktwoyearsago,andnowlookmorelikewhattheindustrysawin2002.”
“ThepaceofdeclineshastaperedoffsincethelargedropsmeasuredinAprilandMay;however,furtherdeclinesareanticipated,”thereportstates.Withthe43.7%dropintheMoody’s/REALNationalAll-PropertyAggregatesincetheOctober2007peak,“itisnownecessarytolooktopropertiespurchasedin2002tofindpositivepriceappreciation.”
Inparticular,thereportnotestheeffectsofpricedropsonloantovaluesareespeciallypronouncedwithmorerecentacquisitions.“Onaverage,loansoriginatedata75%LTVin2005orlaterarenowunderwater”withanaverageLTVtodayof108%,saysthereport.Althoughmostoftheloanswillnotmatureforseveralyears,thusgivingvaluesachancetorecover,“latervintageloansareinadeephole”andfaceincreasingriskofshorttermdefaultaspropertyfundamentalscontinuetoerode.
“Whenitcomestotherateofrecoveryforcommercialrealestate,federalpolicymakersaresettingthepacemoresothanmarketfundamentals,”sayexpertsinareportbasedonPricewaterhousecoopers’quarterlyKorpaczRealEstateInvestorSurvey.
Dr.DavidKellyofJ.P.MorganAssetManagementrecentlyreported:“Unemploymentalwaysgoesupmorequicklythanitcomesdown.Wemaynotreachthatlevel(full-employmentisdefinedbymosteconomistsatanunemploymentrateofabout5%)untilsometimein2014.”TheUnitedStateswasat10.0percentunemploymentinDecember,thehighestunemploymentratesince1983.
AccordingtoBloomberg,“Thedelinquencyrate(incommercialrealestate)willnotimproveuntiltheunemploymentratedropsandconsumerspendingrevives.”
“Baseball is 90% mental -- the other half is physical.” – yogi Berra
Thegravityoftherealtimeproblemisstaggering.Approximately1,341commercialpropertiesinCaliforniaand8,393commercialpropertiesacrosstheUnitedStates,thathavematuringCMBSdebtinthecoming18-months,almost$7billiondollarsofhoteldebtalone,maturesinthenext18-months.Byexample:
California hotel loans:$6.959B
7
NumberofCMBSloansmaturingbypropertytypeinnext18-months:
hotel and resort, California: 195
hotel and resort, united states:1,484
ButthenconsiderthatCMBSdebtisonlyapproximately25%ofallcommercialrealestatedebtwhichisbasedon$3.47trillionincommercialrealestateandmultifamilymortgagedebtoutstanding.
Thevastmajorityofthishoteldebtcomingduewas:
� Underwrittenbetween1999and2003;
� Beforepeakvaluationsin2007;and
� Today’svaluationsareprobablyhigherthantheywereattimeoftheoriginationoftheloans.
Thequestionbecomes,“Howmuchofthisdebtwillpresentwithaminimumofa1.20to1.4debtcoveragerationatroll-overtime?”
Moody’sInvestorsServicereportedduringtheChristmasweekthatmultifamilydelinquenciesrosebynearlyafullpercentagepointbetweenOctoberandNovember2009.Infact,multifamilyrankedsecondonlytohotelsintermsofthemonth-to-monthincreaseintheamountofdelinquentloans.
DatafromTreppLLCillustratesthehighestdelinquencyratesinCMBSloanssofarhavebeen:
� hospitality: 13.47%
� multifamily:13.0%
� retail:9.7%
� other:7.2%
� office: 4.9%TwoofthelargerCMBSportfoliosthatexhibitedstressin2009were:
� A$967.2millionmortgageonahotelportfoliocontrolledbyCNLHotels&Resorts
� A$344.6millionloanonahotelportfolioownedbyBeanieBabyinvestorTyWarner
“you can observe a lot just by watching.” – yogi Berra
ComingoutoftheHolidayseason,aCharlesDickensstoryseemsappropriate:ATaleofTwoCities.Thesearetworealtimecasestudiesevolvingatthistimewithbrandedhotelsinestablishedmarkets:
hotel Default of Week one - Baird/Baird real estate
HyattColumbusCapitolSquare.The400-roomHyattCapitolSquareinColumbus,Ohiowaspurchasedfor$38.7million($96,750/key)in2007andfundedwitha$32million($80,000/key),10-yearCMBSloanoriginatedbyLaSalleBank.TodaytheloanisinspecialservicingwithLNRPartnersafterthehotelgeneratedonly$3.2millionofNOIin2008.Atlastreportthehotelwascoveringdebtservice,butbelowthe1.15xcovenantwhichtriggeredspecialservicingfortheloan.Thehotelwasbuiltin1984andisreportedlyingoodcondition,butsufferingfromoverallweakdemandintheColumbusmarket.Bloombergreportsthattheborrowerisseekingarestructuringoftheloanterms.
hotel Default of Week two - Baird/Baird real estate
SpringhillSuitesSeattle.The234-roomhotel’s$32.7million($139,743/key)CMBSmortgagehasbeentransferredtoCWCapital’sspecialservicinggroup.Themortgageis60daysdelinquentasitsdebtserviceshortfallhasn’tbeenfundedbythecurrentownerssinceOctober.The6.4%fixedratemortgagewasoriginatedinNovember2006byCGM.Debtservicehasdroppedunder1.0x,despitehoteloccupancyof71%YTD.Builtin2001,thehotelonYaleAvenueinSeattlewaspurchasedin2006for$50.7million($217,000/key).
8
Bothoftheseexamplesgotothecoreofourpreviouslystatedconcerns:welllocatedhotels,havejustbeenhammeredbylocalmarketconditionswithdebtcoverageratioissuestomatch.Thegoodnewsisthatwearequotingnon-recoursedebtforhospitalitywithapreferredloansizeof$10M-$30M(howeverthelenderwillconsiderlargeronacase-by-casebasis);LTV’sof60%-70%;withinterestratesbetween7.5%-9.5%,subjecttotheperceivedriskoftheborrowerandthesite;andtermsof5–7years.Thisincludesnew-buildconstructiononacase-by-casebasis.Wearequotingfull-recourseprogramsinhospitalityranginginpreferredloansizeof$15Mup,withvirtuallynoceiling;LTV’sto70%;pricingatPrime+2.5%,so5.75%today;interestonly;andtermsof2–6years.Wealsohaveentitledlandloanprogramsranginginpreferredloansizeof$3Mto$50M.
Wehaveactivelenderswhowilllookatnew-buildhotelsandresortsaswellasreviewbrokenprojectsbutonacase-by-casebasis.
“a nickel isn’t worth a dime today.” – yogi Berra
In closing:
� 1,484hotelandresortCMBSloanscomedueinthecoming18-months
� CMBSdebtisonlyapproximately25%ofallcommercialrealestatedebt
� ThedelinquencyratesinCMBSloanssofarhavebeen13.47%forhospitality,thehighestofall
� Unemploymentwillnotgetbacktonormallevelsuntil2014
� Nobodyknowswhatdebtwilllooklikewhenitreturnsinabundanceotherthanitwillbefarmoreconservativeanditwillbefarmoreexpensive.
� Finally,oneAnonymousbanker‘soutlookwasthat“Probablytheworstdealsaredoneduringgoodtimes,soIsupposedsomeofthebestdealswillbedoneduringthesetimes.”
9
Robert G. Campbell, Esq. Cox, Castle & Nicholson
Constructionlendersfacemyriadchallengesintheplungingeconomyandrealestatemarket.Thedifficultiesincludehandlingaheightenednumberofborrowerdefaults,decidingwhethertocontinuedisbursingconstructionloanfundsinadecliningmarket,anddetermininghowtoweightherisksofforeclosingandcompletingconstructiononanincompleteproject.Whilenavigatingtheseobstacles,lendersshouldalwaysevaluatetheirpotentialliabilitytocontractorsandsuppliersforbondedstopnotices.Meanwhile,claimantsshouldrecognizethefullextentofthestopnoticeremedy.WhilethisarticleispredicateduponCalifornialaw,totheextentthestopnoticelawsofotherjurisdictionsfollowormirrorCalifornialaw,thefollowingdiscussionmaybepertinentandistheseissuesshouldconsidered.
Byservingabondedstopnoticeclaimonthelender,contractorsandsupplierscaneffectivelylienanyundisbursedconstructionloanfunds.Thefailureofaconstructionlendertohonora
properstopnoticecanresultinsubstantialexposure.Constructionlendersthatignoreabondedstopnoticeclaimonaprivateworkofimprovementdosoattheirperil.(1)
Astopnoticeisawrittenandverifiedstatementservedbyaclaimantowedmoneyonaworkofimprovement.Thestatementmustidentifytheclaimantanddescribethenatureofthelabor,materials,orservicesprovided;thenameofthepartytowhomthesewerefurnished;thedollarvalueofwhatwasfurnished;andtheamountclaimedasdue.(2)Byservingavalidstopnoticeonaconstructionlender,astopnoticeclaimantcreatesaclaimorlienonundisbursedconstructionfundsinthehandsofanownerorlenderforthebenefitoftheclaimant.Thisremedyallowscontractors,subcontractors,andmaterialmentoreachundisbursedconstructionloanproceedsassecurityagainstnonpayment.(3)Onceabondedstopnoticeisserved,thelendermustwithholdfromavailableconstructionfundsanamountsufficienttopaythestopnoticeclaimandmaynotusethatwithheldamounttopaydowntheprincipalamountoftheloanortopayinterest,fees,orothercosts.(4)
“Abondedstopnotice”isdefinedasastopnoticegiventoaconstructionlenderthatisaccompaniedbyabondinapenalsumequalto1.25timestheamountoftheclaim.(5)Aconstructionlenderisonlyobligatedtowithholdfundsfromanowner/borrowerifproperlyservedwithabondedstopnotice.Indeed,aconstructionlenderisnotobligatedtohonorastopnoticethatisnotbonded.(6)Theconstructionlendermustwithholdfundspursuanttoabondedstopnoticeservedbyanoriginalcontractor,subcontractor,orfirst-tiersupplier.
Thestopnoticeclaimantalsomaydemandinitsstopnoticethatthelenderprovideacopyofanypaymentbond.(7)Ifthereisapaymentbondrecordedfortheproject,differentrulesapply.Whenapaymentbondhasbeenrecorded,thelenderisnotrequiredtowithholdfundsbutmaydosoatitsoption.(8)Thisappliestoallproperclaimantsotherthantheoriginalcontractor.Similarly,anownerservedwithastopnoticeisnotrequiredtowithholdfundswhenapaymentbondhasbeenrecordedbutmaydosoatitsoption.(9)Ifanownerdeclinestowithholdfundsinresponsetoastopnoticebecauseapaymentbondhasbeenrecorded,thentheownermustfurnishtheclaimantwithacopyofthepaymentbond.
Avalidstopnoticecanbeahighlyeffectiveremedyforaclaimantseekingtoobtainpaymentforitswork.Alenderthatimproperlydisbursesfundssubjecttoastopnoticeispersonallyliablefortheamountduetothelienclaimantunderthecontractwiththeowner(butnotexceedingthemaximumamountofunexpendedconstructionfunds).(10)Further,thestopnoticeremedyisindependentandcumulativeofaclaimant’srightstoamechanic’slien,toenforceanypaymentbond,andtopursueawritofattachment.(11)Thus,aclaimantmayavailitselfofallprejudgmentremediessimultaneously.
Likemechanic’sliens,stopnoticesarenonconsensualanddonotrequirepriorjudicialapproval.Moreover,lienandstopnoticerightsmaynotbewaivedbycontract,reflectingastrongpublicpolicyfavoringpaymentforthosewhoimproveproperty.Similarly,noassignmentbytheownerorcontractorofconstructionloanfunds—whethermadebeforeorafterserviceofastopnoticeonaconstructionlender—haspriorityoverthestopnoticeclaimant.Assignmentscannotdefeattherightsofstopnoticeclaimants.(12)
stop notice risks for Construction Lenders
10
Stopnoticesdifferfrommechanic’sliensinthattheyattachtothefundsoftheowneroftheproperty,ortheconstructionloanproceedsfromalender,ratherthantotherealpropertybeingimproved.(13)Asaresult,astopnoticesurvivesaforeclosureoftheproperty.Thus,stopnoticesdonotgiverisetothepriorityissuesregardingtheconstructionlender’sdeedoftrustthatemergewithmechanic’sliens.(14)Ifseveralstopnoticeshavebeenfiledandnotenoughmoneyexiststopaythemall,stopnoticeclaimantsshareprorataintheavailablefunds.15
L I m I tat I o n s a n D r eq u I r e m e n ts
Statuteslimitwhocanassertastopnotice.Ingeneral,Californialawprovidesthatallpersonsandentitiesqualifiedtorecordamechanics’lien,withtheexceptionofthegeneralcontractor,mayserveastopnoticeontheowner.Thisincludesmaterialmen,subcontractors,first-tiersuppliers,equipmentlessors,licenseddesignprofessionals,uniontrustfunds,andthosewhomakeimprovementstothesite.(16)Thesesameclassesofclaimants,plusthegeneralcontractor,mayserveastopnoticeontheconstructionlender.Onlywhenthestopnoticeisbondedisthelenderrequiredtowithholdfunds.
Stopnoticeclaimantsneednotwaituntiltheirworkiscompletetoserveastopnotice.Thisisincontrasttomechanic’slienclaimants,whomustwaituntiltheirworkortheoverallworkofimprovementiscomplete.Nevertheless,stopnoticeclaimantsmusttakenumeroustechnicalstepstoensurethattheirstopnoticesarevalid.Theymustserveaproper20-daypreliminarynoticeinatimelymanner.Servicemusttakeplace“priortotheexpirationoftheperiodwithinwhich[theclaimant’s]claimoflienmustberecordedunder[CivilCode]Section3115,3116,or3117.”17Thesesectionscalculatetheexpirationoftheserviceperiodasaspecifiednumberofdaysafterthecompletionoftheworkofimprovementortherecordationofanoticeofcompletion.
Inmostcases,ownersorlendersdonotrecordorservevalidnoticesofcompletionforcompletedprojects.Intheabsenceofavalidlyrecordedandservednoticeofcompletion,claimantshave90daysfromcompletionoftheprojecttoserveastopnotice.Thatperiodisshorterwhenavalidnoticeofcompletionhasbeenrecordedandserved,orwhenavalidnoticeofcessationhasbeenrecorded.(18)Claimantsmustpaycarefulattentiontotheseprerequisitestoperfecttheirstopnoticerights.
Ifownersorlendersdisputethevalidityofthestopnotice,theymustpostastopnoticereleasebondinanamount1.25timestheamountofthestopnotice.Onlyuponthefilingofthebond,whichhastheeffectofprovidingsubstitutesecurityfortheclaimofthestopnoticeclaimant,canthewithheldfundsbereleased.(19)
Similartoamechanic’slienclaimant,astopnoticeclaimantmusttakepromptlegalactiontoenforcethestopnotice.Anactiontoenforcethestopnoticemaybecommencedatanytimeafter10daysfollowingserviceofthestopnoticebutnolaterthan90daysfollowingtheperiodinwhichamechanic’sliencouldberecorded.Ifnoactioniscommencedwithintheprescribedperiod,thestopnoticeceasestobeeffective,andwithheldfundsmaybepaidtothepersontowhomthefundsareowed.Ifanactioniscommenced,noticemustbegivenwithinfivedays.(20)Whenmultipleactionstoenforceastopnoticearefiled,amotiontoconsolidatemaybefiledsothattheactionswillbeadjudicatedtogetherinoneproceeding.(21)
Asignificantdistinctionbetweenamechanic’slienforeclosureactionandastopnoticeenforcementactionistherightofbondedstopnoticeclaimantstorecovertheirattorney’sfeesiftheyaredeterminedtobetheprevailingparty.(22)Bystatute,prevailingpartyclaimantsalsowillbeawardedinterestatthelegalrate.Interestaccruesfromthedateofserviceofthestopnotice.(23)
Constructionlendersfacingastopnoticeclaimshouldunderstandthatthestatutesgoverningstopnoticesareremedialandareliberallyconstruedtoeffecttheirobjectivesandtopromotejustice.Therefore,whilecertaindeadlinesarestrictlyenforced(suchasthedeadlineforaclaimanttocommencelegalactiontoenforceastopnotice),otherrequirementsareliberallyconstruedinfavoroftheclaimant.(24)Stopnoticesaredesignedtoprotectmaterialmenwhofurnishlaborandmaterialsthatenhancethevalueofthepropertyandaresupposedtobepaidoutoftheconstructionfund.(25)
Asonecourtreasoned,alender’sseniordeedoftrustusuallyprotectsthelenderfromtheriskofdefault.(26)Meanwhile,alendermayprotectagainsttheriskofnonpaymentofclaimantsbyrequiringtheownerordevelopertopostapaymentbond.Alsothelendercaninspecttheprogressoftheconstruction,issuejointchecks,orinstituteotherfundingcontrols.Thecourtfurthernotedthatpermittingaclaimanttorecoveragainstthelenderformaterialsandlaborcontributedtothepropertyisappropriatebecausethosecontributionsincreasethevalueof
11
thepropertyandthereforeenhancethelender’ssecurity.Inaddition,thecourtdeclaredthatstrongpolicyreasonssupportrequiringcommerciallenderstopolicethebuildingindustry—andthestopnoticeremedyencouragesthisaswell.
Thepurposeofastopnoticeistoprovidematerialmenwithprotectionswhentheyextendtheirresourcesinreturnforafuturepaymentfromaconstructionfund.Mostoftensmallercompaniesaretheoneswhofilestopnotices—companiesthathaveprovidedlaborormaterialstoaprojectwithouttheresourcestolitigate.Whenbalancingtheprotectionofclaimantsexpendingtheirlaborandmaterialsagainstownersorlendersreceivingthebenefitofthosegoodsandservices,theequityscaleusuallytipsinfavorofclaimants.
Becausethestopnoticeremedyissohighlyeffectiveforstopnoticeclaimants,constructionlendershavemadeseveralattemptsovertheyearstostructureaconstructionloanthateffectivelycircumventsit.Inlightofthepoliciesinsupportoftheremedy,lendershavenotmetwithmuchsuccessintryingtodefendagainststopnotices.Forexample,inacaseinvolvingaborrower/ownerthatassignedtothelendertheloanfundunderanagreementtomakespecifiedprogresspaymentstothecontractor,thelendercouldnotdefeatastopnoticeclaimbyassertingarighttoretaintheassignedfundassecurityforrepaymentoftheloan.(27)
Furthermore,ifalendercouldevisceratethepurposeofthestopnoticestatutesbysimplynotcreatingaseparateconstructionfund,theneverysetofconstructionloandocumentsinCaliforniawoulddothesame,andbondedstopnoticeswouldbecomeineffective.ThisresultwouldbecontrarytothepurposeofstopnoticesasdefinedbyCaliforniacourts.Topermitlenderstodootherwisewouldallowthem,uponforeclosureofaproperty,tohavethebenefitsoftheprovidedmaterialsandlaborwithoutpayment—anddeprivelienclaimantsofanyeffectiveremedy.
Courtshavealsoheldthatastopnoticewillreachanundisbursedloanfundevenfollowingadefaultbytheborrowerterminatingtheborrower’srighttoobtainfurtherdisbursementsfromtheloanfund.(28)Stopnoticepriorityextendstoallloanfundsthatremainsubjecttodisbursement—eventhosethatmaynotbedueunderthelender/borrowerconstructionagreementbecausedisbursementconditionshavenotbeensatisfied.Thispriorityisunchangedeveniftheborrowerisindefault.(29)Asaconsequence,alendermaynotproperlydefeatastopnoticebyinsistingthatnoundisbursedfundsexistbecausetheborrowerisindefaultandthelenderisthereforenotobligatedtodisbursethosefunds.Privateagreementsbetweenlendersandborrowersmaynotserveasadefensetoastopnoticeclaim.
Inaseminaldecision,FamilianCorporationv.ImperialBank,(30)thecourtrefusedtoallowalendertopre-allocateconstructionloanfundstoaninterestreserveandtherebyeffectivelysubordinateperfectedstopnoticeclaimstotheinterestreserve.Thecourtheldthatthelendermaynotpayitselffees,points,andinterestinpreferencetostopnoticeclaimantsattheinceptionoftheloan,thusreducingtheloanfundandachievingpriorityoverliensorstopnoticeclaimants.Thispracticeviolatestheanti-assignmentedictofthestopnoticestatutes.(31)Lendersalsoarejudiciallyprohibitedfromattemptingtoachievepriorityby1)applyingtheloanbalancetoreducetheamountdueundertheconstructionnote,and2)depositingunexpendedconstructionloanfundsintoageneralfundorseparateescrowaccount.(32)
Co n st r u C t I o n F u n D s a n D L e n D e r L I a B I L It y
Conflictssometimesariseoverwhatconstitutesaconstructionfund.InpartthiscontroversystemsfromthefactthattheCaliforniaCivilCodedoesnotcurrentlycontainaprovisionspecificallydefininga“constructionfund”forpurposesofstopnoticeclaimants.However,formerCodeofCivilProcedureSection1190.1(h)—thepredecessortoCivilCodeSection3166—defines“constructionfund”astheamounteither“furnishedortobefurnishedbytheownerorlender…asafundfromwhichtopayconstructioncosts”or“arisingoutofaconstructionorbuildingloan.”(33)CivilCodeSection3087definesa“constructionlender”asanymortgageelendingfundstopayforthecostoftheworkofimprovementsonapropertyora“partyholdingfundsfurnishedortobefurnishedbytheownerorlenderoranyotherpersonasafundfromwhichtopayconstructioncosts.”
TheplainlanguageoftheCivilCodeanditspredecessorintheCodeofCivilProcedurebroadlytreataconstructionfundasanyamountofmoneydesignatedtobeusedtopayconstructioncosts.InbothCivilCodeSection3087andformerCodeofCivilProcedureSection1190.1(h),theonlyrequirementforestablishingaconstructionfundisthatanamountmustbedesignatedas“afundfromwhichtopayconstructioncosts.”Therefore,aconstructionloanagreementthatspecifiestheloanproceedsasthemoneyforpayingconstructioncostswouldqualifyasaconstructionfundforthepurposesofstopnotices.
12
Theamountretainedbythelenderinresponsetoabondedstopnoticeshouldnotbeusedtopaydowntheprincipalamountoftheloanortopayinterest,fees,orothercostsowedtothelender.Alenderthatfailstoproperlywithholdundisbursedloanproceedsfollowingabondedstopnoticeispersonallyliablefortheamountduetothelienclaimant.Nevertheless,thelenderwillnotbeliableformorethantheamountoftheundisbursedloanproceedsatthetimethebondedstopnoticewasserved.
Fo L LoW I n g Fa m I L I a n
TheFamiliandecisionshouldguidelendersintheirresponsetobondedstopnotices.(34)InFamilian,aconstructionlenderreceivedbondedstopnoticesthatfarexceededtheundisbursedloanbalance.Meanwhile,thelenderhadpaiditselfinterestandfeesfromareserveaccountspecificallysetuptopayinterestontheloanandotherfeesowedtothelenderasthoseamountsaccrued.Theclaimantcontestedtherightofthelendertopayitselffromthereserveaccountbeforethestopnoticewasserved,andthecourtagreedwiththeclaimant.
AccordingtotheFamiliancourt,thepracticeofmakingpaymentfromaninterestreserveconstitutesastatutorilyprohibitedassignmentunderCivilCodeSection3166.Thecourtheldthatthelendermaynotpayitselffeesandinterestinpreferencetostopnoticeclaimants.Todootherwisewouldpermitthelenderadoublerecoverybyallowingittocapturefeesandinterestaswellastheenhancedvalueofitsproperty.Thatenhancedvalueiscreatedbytheconstructionworkperformedbytheclaimants.
TheeffectoftheFamiliandecisionishuge,becauseitcanleadtolendersbeingrequiredtodisgorgeamountstheyhavepaidtothemselvesinearnedinterestandexpenses.ItalsofollowsunderFamilianthatconstructionlenderswithfullydisbursedloansremainatrisk.
Inaddition,whenaconstructionloanissold,apreexistingbondedstopnoticeclaimisnotdefeatedbythetransfer.Theoriginalconstructionlenderservedwithaneffectivebondedstopnoticeremainsobligatedtocomplywithstopnoticewithholdingrequirements.Therefore,constructionlendersshouldprocureappropriateindemnitiesortakeotheractionstosafeguardagainstthisriskwhensellingaloansubjecttoabondedstopnotice.
ManyquestiontherationaleoftheFamiliandecisionandconsideritpoorlyreasoned.Forexample,inSteinyv.CiticorpRealEstate,Inc.,anotherappellatecourtdisagreedwithFamilian(35)andruledthatalenderwasentitledtokeeppaymentsmadetoitselffromtheloanfundtotheextentthoseamountswereearnedpriortoserviceofthestopnotice.However,theSteinycasewasdecertifiedfrompublicationand,asaconsequence,maynotbecitedasauthority.Familian,wartsandall,remainsexistinglaw.Whilelendersmustheedthisdecision,bondedstopnoticeclaimantshavebeenhandedapowerfulsword.
Lendersseekingtodefendagainstastopnoticeclaimshouldfirstevaluatewhethertheprerequisitesforastopnoticehavebeenmet,suchasverifyingthattheclaimantobtainedtheappropriatebond,gaveaproperandtimely20-daypreliminarynotice,andtimelyservedthestopnotice.Theyshouldfurtherascertainthattheclaimantisamongthecategoriesofclaimantsthatpossessstopnoticerights.Moreover,intheappropriatecircumstances,lendersshoulddiscerniftheclaimantwasproperlylicensed.Also,alendershouldworkwiththeborrowertodeterminethemeritsoftheamountclaimedtobedueandattempttocompeltheborrowertoresolvethedisputewiththeclaimant.Alendershouldconsiderdemandingthatthepropertyownersecureastopnoticereleasebondifalegitimatedisputeexists.
Lenderswhoselldistressedconstructionloansretainanyexistingstopnoticeliability.Merelytransferringanotedoesnotridalenderoftheobligationtohonoranexistingbondedstopnotice.Provisionstoprotectagainstthisrisk,includingindemnities,shouldbemadepartoftheloansaleagreement.
Ultimately,owner/borrowersandlendersshareastrongincentivetokeepstopnoticesfrominterferingwithtimelyprojectcompletion.Anincompleteanddelayedprojectincreasesconstructioncostsandunderminesthevalueofalender’ssecurity.Inaddition,ifalawsuitisfiledtoenforcethestopnoticeandisaccompaniedbyamechanic’slienforeclosureaction,thelendershouldconsiderwhethertotenderthelawsuittothetitleinsurer.Finally,lendersmayneedtoconsiderwhethertofileaninterpleaderaction,inwhichtheymaybeentitledtorecovertheirattorney’sfees.
13
r e F e r e n C es
1. stop notices on public works projects are governed by different rules.
2. Civ. Code §3103.
3. Civ. Code §3083 (defining “bonded stop notice”)and §3103 (defining “stop notice”); Black’s Law Dictionary 1432 (7th ed. 1999).
4. a-1 Door & materials Co. v. Fresno guarantee sav. & Loan ass’n, 61 Cal. 2d 728 (1964).
5. Civ. Code §3083.
6. Civ. Code §§3159, 3162.
7. Civ. Code §3159(a)(3).
8. Civ. Code §3159(a)(2).
9. Civ. Code §3161.
10. Calhoun v. huntington Park First sav. & Loan ass’n, 186 Cal. app. 2d 451 (1960).
11. Civ. Code §§3158 et seq.
12. Civ. Code §3166.
13. Connolly Dev., Inc. v. superior Court, 17 Cal. 3d 803 (1976).
14. mechanical Wholesale Corp. v. Fuji Bank, Ltd., 42 Cal. app. 4th 1647 (1996).
15. Civ. Code §3167.
16. Civ. Code §3158.
17. Civ. Code §3160.
18. Civ. Code §§3115, 3117.
19. Civ. Code §3171.
20. Civ. Code §3172.
21. Civ. Code §3175.
22. Civ. Code §3176.
23. Id.
24. hendrickson v. Bertelson, 1 Cal. 2d 430 (1934); Familian Corp. v. Imperial Bank, 213 Cal. app. 3d 681 (1989).
25. rossman mill & Lumber Co. v. Fullerton sav. & Loan ass’n, 221 Cal. app. 2d 705, 709 (1963).
26. miller v. mountain view sav. & Loan ass’n, 238 Cal. app. 2d 644 (1965).
27. a-1 Door & materials Co. v. Fresno guarantee sav. & Loan ass’n, 61 Cal. 2d 728 (1964).
28. Id.
29. Id. at 734.
30. Familian Corp. v. Imperial Bank, 213 Cal. app. 3d 681 (1989).
31. Civ. Code §3166.
32. Familian, 213 Cal. app. 3d at 686.
33. see, e.g., a-1 Door, 61 Cal. 2d at 734 (quoting former Code of Civil Procedure §1190.1).
34. Familian, 213 Cal. app. 3d 681.
35. steiny v. Citicorp real estate, Inc., 85 Cal. rptr. 2d 38 (1999) (unpublished).
14
by Dennis L. Allen, CPA, CFE, CCIFP, Senior Vice President for Hill International
TheconceptofRiskManagementiswellestablished,thoughnotalwayswellfollowedinmanagementplans,especiallyonconstructionprojects.TheProjectManagementInstitute’saGuidetotheProjectManagementBodyofKnowledgedefinesRiskManagementasthe“systematicprocessofidentifying,analyzing,andresponsingtoprojectrisk.Itincludesmaximizingtheprobabilityandconsequencesofpositiveeventsandminimizingtheprobabilityandconsequencesofadverseeventstoprojectobjectives.”Potentialcashflowproblemsofowners,contractors,andsubcontractorshasalwaysbeenoneoftherisksconsideredintheseplansbutinthecurrenteconomy,theriskisfargreaterandtheeffectsmuchmoresignificant.Thesefinancialriskscanstrikefromanumberofdirectionsastheowner,thelender,thedesigner,thegeneralcontractor,subcontractors,andevenmaterial
supplierscancallanddeclaretheyaredone,“sorry”.
P r e v e n t I o n
Likemostrisks,financialriskmanagementstartsearlywiththedevelopmentofcontract(s).Somequestionstoconsideratthisstagewouldinclude:
� Whointhechainisresponsibleforthefailureofanotherparty?
� Arepaymentandperformancebonds,largelyavoidedincommercialprojects,arequirementtoreconsiderintoday’sclimate?
� Whatcontractsareassignableupondefault?
� Whoownsstoredmaterialsandoffsitework-in-progress?
� Whatisasufficientretainagepercentageoramounttorestartworkwithareplacementcontractor/subcontractor?
� Whatreportingrequirementsorotherproceduralactivitiescanbeusedtodemonstratecurrentandongoingfinancialhealth?
Theabilityoftheownertopayhaslongbeenacommonquestion,andhistorically,evidenceofaconstructionloanhasbeenthenecessaryproof.Butitisimportanttorememberthathavingaconstructionloaninplacedoesn’tguaranteepaymentifthedeveloperdefaults.Butit’snotjustownerstothinkabout.Whataboutthefinancialhealthoftheotherentities,contractors,designers,manufacturers?Intoday’schallengingeconomy,manyaresofocusedonwinningworkthattheyfailtoconsidertheprecariousnatureoftoday’sprojectteams.Partiesshouldconsidermakingproofofthefinancialhealthofallpartiesaperiodicrequirementjustlikeonewouldverifyproofofinsurance.Lookatfinancialstatementsandcreditreportswithanadvisorthatcaninterprettherisksinvolvedasevenasubcontractors’cashcrisiscanhobbletheforwardprogressofajob.Makethereportingrequirementsandthefinancialhealthrequirementsspecifictoavoiddisagreementslaterintheprojectastohowhealthyishealthy.
Atthetimeoflettingthecontracts,lookcarefullyattheScheduleofValues(“SOV”).FrontloadedSOV’s,or“unbalanced”bidscanleadtoproblems.Ifthecontractororsubcontractorneedsamobilizationpaymentbeyonditsimmediatecashcostsoftheproject,consideraloanthatisrecoupedoverthecourseoftheproject.Atatimewhentheeconomicpressureoncontractorsistogetcashearlyintheproject,goodbusinesspractices,aswellaseconomicpressuresonowners/developersistopayforonlythepro-rataportionoftheprojectineachpaymentapplication.TheproposedScheduleofValuesorMilestonePaymentsneedsscrutinytoavoidunintentionallypayingformoreworkthanactuallyhasbeencompleted.
risk management and the Distressed Property
15
m o n I to r I n g
ThemonitoringpartofaRiskManagementplanislargelyself-perpetuatingifthepaymentproceduresaresetupappropriately.Theobjectiveistomaintaintheproperbalancebetweenwhathasbeenpaidforandwhathasbeendeliveredorperformed.Assuch,theongoinginvoicingandpaymentprocessiscriticalinthesedifficulttimes.Whereasbefore,onecouldrelaxsomewhatintheknowledgethatbeing“paidahead”wasonlyamoderatetimingissueonalumpsumcontract,theprospectsoffinancialfailureofacontractororsubcontractortoday,havemadeitcriticaltonotonlylimitprogresspaymentstorealprogress,buttomakesureyouownwhatyoujustpaidfor.Somespecificprocedurestoconsider:
� MakeProgressPaymentcheckstoboththeprimecontractorandthesubcontractors(i.e.dualpayees),paymentsmadedirecttosubcontractors,aswellasenforceablelienreleasesareawaytobesurethatthechainofcashflowdoesnotbreakdown.
� Lackingdualchecks,havearequiredscheduleforthepaymentofinvoicesdownthechainofsuppliersandthereceiptoflienreleasesandaggressivelyenforcethatschedule.Iftheschedulestartstosliptakeactionimmediatelytodeterminethecauseoftheproblemandensureit’snotthebeginningofadownhillslide.Thecontractor/subcontractorwhoisslowingpaymentstosubcontractorsnotonlyisnotmakingyoufriendsontheproject,butputsthepayeratriskifthecontractorweretoquitunexpectedly.
� Considermakingcontractorpaymentstiedtocompletionmilestonesorspecificactivitiesintheprojectschedule.Thisisacommonprocedurethatencouragespropermonitoringoftheprojectscheduleandincentivizestheteamtowatchtheactualprojectprogressandmanagethescheduleappropriately.
� Considertheuseofindependentwarehousesandbillofsalesforstoredmaterials.Thematerialsupplierwhohaspossessionofpaid-for,butundeliveredprojectmaterialscanbeasignificantrisktoboththecostandscheduleoftheproject
� Havetheownerkeepatleast60daysofconstructioncostinanescrowaccountandcheckthatthebalanceismaintainedproperly.Stopworkifthebalancedipsbelowthecostsincurredtodate,theretainagebalance,andthecosttodemobilize.
� Watchtheprogressofthearchitectsdesignworktoensurethattheusablecompletedworkisatleastroughlyequaltotheamountpaidtothearchitectanditssub-consultants.
� Getpendingchangeordersresolved,onthescheduleofvalues,andpaidinatimelymanner.Ifsomeonegoesunder,alonglistofunresolvedchangeordersisalwaysaproblem.
m I t I g at I o n
Despitealltheplanningandmonitoring,thereisstillariskofsomeonegoingunder.Thefinalstepofariskmanagementstrategyistohaveaplanincasetheworstcasescenariooccurs.Whenthishappens,theprojectteamoftenreactsinaverysymptomaticmanner,i.e.fixthecurrentissueandmoveon.Unlessoneaddressesthecausationalissue(s),aquickfix,suchasacashadvanceorreleaseofretainage,islikelytojustpushbackthetimewhentheentitywillgetintroubleagain.Beverysuspiciousofvagueexplanationssuchas“bankerror”or“administrativeglitches”thatmighttemptyoutoproceedonhopingforthebest.Likethefrogthatgetsusedtothehotwaterafewdegreesatatime,it’stemptingtoletlatepaymentsslidealittleratherthansteppinginquickly.Rarelyhasanyonesaidtheywishtheyhadtakenactionlaterthantheydid.Ifformalbankruptcyisinvolved,thereareprocedurestobefollowedandtheadviceofanattorneyisinvaluable.Butuntilthen,considerthefollowingtoprotectyourself:
Ifyouaretheownerwhereacontractor,subcontractor,orsupplierbelowyouhasstoppedworking:
� Readthecontractandfollowallspecificandrequiredprocedures.
� Contactthesuretyifthereisone.
� Takecontrolofthesiteandanyoff-siteassetsyouhavepaidfor.Protectyourselffromthecreditorswhowillalsobetryingtograbwhattheycan.
16
� Inventorythesiteandtheactualcompletionstageoftheproject.Alsolookalsoforcompleted,butdeficientworktolimitwhatyoumayfindyourselfpayingfortwice.Createarecordbytakingpictures,includingavideoofthesiteandmaterials.
� Looktoyourabilitytoassumelowertierentitiestocutouttheproblemandkeeptheprojectmoving.
� Totheextentpossible,communicatewitheveryonetokeeptheteamtogetherandtheprojectmovingforwardifatallpossible.Stoppingandrestartingisanexpensiveproposition.
� Takeafewextradaysthoughandseeifyoucangetareplacementcontractor/supplierforafixedpricetocompletion.Commonly,thereplacementcompaniesdon’twanttheriskofalumpsumwhendoingatakeover,buteventhemulesknowwhentheworkisT&M.
� Ifyouareacontractorandoneofthepartiesaboveyouhasquit:
� Readthecontractandfollowanyspecificprocedures.
� Contactthesuretyifthereisone.
� Takecontrolofanythingyouhavecompletedandnotbeenpaidfor.
� Inventorythesiteandtheactualcompletionstageoftheproject.Takepicturestodocumenttheworkandmaterialsinplace.
� Takecontrolofyourequipmentanduninstalledmaterials.
� Communicatewithanyentitiesbelowyou.
� Sendaninvoiceforanyworkyouhavecompleted,buthavenotbeenpaidforto-date.
� Don’tcompleteanymoreworkuntilyouknowhowyouaretobepaid.
� Don’thesitatetofilealienwhereappropriate.
Co n C Lu s I o n
Unexpectedeventshavealwaysoccurredonconstructionprojects.Theindustryasawholeisgoodatreacting,correcting,andcompletingaprojectdespiteitschallenges.Thedistressedproject,thoughstillrare,hasauniqueabilitytosurprisetheunawareandleaveaffectedpartieswithnoviablecorrectiveactionstotake.ARiskManagementPlan,includingconsiderationsforfinancialrisk,isthebestwaytominimizetheimpactoftheseunfortunatecircumstances.