individual performance commitment and review form - psds

8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS

1/8

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Republic of the Philippinesepartment of Education

Region IV ADivision of BatangasMALVAR DISTRICT

Name of Employee: LUISITO P. DE CASTRO Name of Rater: DR. CARLITO D. ROCAFORT, CESO V

Position: OIC - PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERVISOR Position: SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT

Review Period: JANUARY-DECEMBER 2014 Date of Review : JANUARY 2015

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING

EVALUATION

MAJOR FINAL

OUTPUTS

KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT

PER KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RESULTS

RATING

Planning, Organizing

and Networking

Provided assistance to at least 2-3 school

heads who need assistance in preparingSchool Improvement Plan/AIP, and Learningcenters Improvement Plan within target date.

April May

2014

20 %

6

(5) Complete and timely submission of

consolidated reports on school andlearning centers improvement plan andwith the following components: Schools situationer within the

district Summary of Performance Indicators Common Actions Points/Programs M & E Mechanisms Financial Requirements Recommendations ConsolIdate/validate accuracy of

data, reports submitted by schoolsfor the Division MIS as delegated bySDS

(4) Consolidated reports containing 4parts and with good and feasiblerecommendations.


2/8

(3) Consolidated reports fairly presented,with missing components/parts

(2) Poor presentation of reports;components/parts largely missing.

(1) No consolidated report

Analyzed and interpreted educationindicators within target date.

March 2015 8 (5) > Record of Performance Indicators

> Trending Analysis

> Action Plan/s to address criticalIndicators

> Implementation Report on

Interventions and Programs

> Full report submitted to SDS

(4) All conditions were met andsatisfactorily accomplished.

(3 ) 3-4 conditions were met withsatisfactory results.

(2) Conditions are largely absent, with noactions to address critical indicators.

(1) Data only with no analysis. Conducted at least one (1) action research onnon-academic factors affecting learningprogress and achievement with target date.

August 2014-January 2015

6 (5) 5 Action research conductedfollowing prescribed format andfeasible/substantive recommendations,with results adopted for decisions.

(4) 4 Action research conductedfollowing prescribed format with verygood results adopted and utilized fordecisions.

(3) 3 Action research conductedfollowing prescribed format and withresults adopted and utilized for

decisions.(2) 2 action research conducted withresults adopted and utilized fordecisions.

(1) 1 action research conducted adopted


3/8

and utilized for decisions.

CurriculumImplementation and

Evaluation

Visited and monitored at least 10 schools outof 20 for supervision of curriculumimplementation on target dates.

January December 2014

35 %

15

(5) 130% and above schools were visitedand monitored with completemonitoring report

(4) 115-129% schools were visited andmonitored with complete monitoring

report(3) 100-114% schools were visited andmonitored with complete monitoringreport

(2) 51-99% schools were visited andmonitored with complete monitoringreport

(1) 50% and below of schools visited andmonitored with complete monitoringreport

Provided technical assistance to at least 3-5school heads in matters of instructionalsupervision such as classroom observationtechniques, management of facilities andresource mobilization, when solicited, withintarget date.


6

(5) 130 and above covered and wereprovided

* technical assistance, withconsolidated report on nature ofassistance with reference toperformance and other problems

* monitored desks, textbook or moduledeliveries/allocations (wit monitoringreport)

(4) 115-129% of schools covered withtechnical assistance provided

(3) 100-114% % of schools covered withtechnical assistance provided

(2) 51-99% of schools covered withtechnical assistance provided

(1) 50% and below o f schools coveredwith technical assistance provided

Assisted and served as resource person andfacilitator in at least 4 schools during INSETs


(5) 130% and above of the schools servedand assisted (with INSET monitoring


4/8

within the rating period 6 form)

(4) 115-129% of the schools served andassisted (with INSET monitoring form)



(1) 50% and below of the schools servedand assisted (with INSET monitoringform)

Monitored implementation of at least 1 ALSprogram, project and activity within targetdate.


8 (5) * 130% and above of ALS classesmonitored (with monitoring report andrecommendations)

* Reports submitted anddiscussed/presented to SDS.

(4) 115-129% of ALS classes monitored(with monitoring report andrecommendations)






(1) 50% and below of ALS classes

monitored (with monitoring report andrecommendations)


Human ResourceDevelopment and

Conducted at least 2 formal classroomobservations per week among teachers for

January toFebruary 2014

30%10

(5) 130% of the teachers and above wereobserved and given assistance to


5/8

Management their professional development. And

July -Dec. 2014

improve teaching competence (withsupervisory plans, reports andrecommendations)

(4) 115-129% of the teachers wereobserved and given assistance toimprove teaching competence (withsupervisory plans, reports andrecommendations)

(3) 100-114% were observed and givenassistance to improve teachingcompetence (with supervisory plans,reports and recommendations)

(2) 51-99% were observed and givenassistance to improve teachingcompetence (with supervisory plans,reports and recommendations)

(1) 50 \% and below were observed andgiven assistance to improve teachingcompetence (with supervisory plans,reports and recommendations)

Monitored the conduct of Teacher InductionProgram activities to at least 5 newly hiredteachers (0-3 years), when solicited

June toDecember 2014

7 (5) 130% of the newly hired teachers (0-3years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)

(4) 115-129% of the newly hired teachers(0-3 years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)

(3) 100-114% of the newly hired teachers(0-3 years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)

(2) (51-99% of the newly hired teachers(0-3 years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)

(1) 50% and below of the newly hired


6/8

teachers (0-3 years ) were given TeacherInduction Program activities (withmonitoring and accomplishment report)

Organized and managed at least 1 district in-service training/professional enhancementbased on needs of teachers

January-December

2014

5 (5) 130% and above of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)

(4) 115-129% of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)

(3) 100-114% of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)

(2) 51-99% of district in-service trainingswere organized and managed (withapproved training matrix, M&E report)

(1) 50% and below of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed

(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)

Evaluated performance of the ALSCoordinator & Mobile Teachers within targetdate


8 (5) 130% and above of ALS coordinatorscovered

(4) 115-129% of ALS coordinatorscovered

(3) 100-114% of ALS coordinatorscovered

(2) 51-99% of ALS coordinators covered

(1) 50% and below of ALS coordinatorscovered

Special Tasks/ otherAssignments

Assisted at least 2-3 school heads in self-management, decision-making and utilizationand development of school resources, whensolicited.

June-Dec. 2014& Jan-March

2015

15 % 7

(5) 130% and above covered and wereprovided assistance with report onnature of assistance given with referenceto self-management, decision makingand development of school resources.

(4) 115-129% covered and were provided


7/8

assistance with report on nature ofassistance given with reference to self-management, decision making anddevelopment of school resources.

(3) 100-114% covered and were providedassistance with report on nature ofassistance given with reference to self-management, decision making anddevelopment of school resources.

(2) 51-99% covered and were providedassistance with report on nature ofassistance given with reference to self-management, decision making anddevelopment of school resources.

(1) 50% and below covered and wereprovided assistance with report onnature of assistance given with referenceto self-management, decision makingand development of school resources.

Represented the SDS in the Local School

Board meeting and allocation of budget

January-

December 2014

8 (5) 130% and above of the tasks

assigned by the SDS were performedaccording to standards set withaccomplishment report submitted toauthorities concerned

(4) 115-129% of the tasks assigned by theSDS were performed according tostandards set with accomplishmentreport submitted to authoritiesconcerned

(3) 100-114% of the tasks assigned by theSDS were performed according tostandards set with accomplishment

report submitted to authoritiesconcerned

(2) 51-99% of the tasks assigned by theSDS were performed according tostandards set with accomplishment


8/8

individual performance commitment and review form - psds

Documents