integrated cmos hall microsystems and application for current...
TRANSCRIPT
IMS University of Pavia
Integrated Microsystems LaboratoryUniversity of Pavia
Integrated CMOS Hall Microsystemsand Application for Current Sensors
PROF. FRANCO MALOBERTITutor
HADI HEIDARIPh.D. Student
1st Year PhD Activities Report 2011/2012
IMS University of Pavia
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND HALL EFFECT DEVICES
RESEARCH STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
IMS University of Pavia
There is still room to change the concepts for new Hall devices and push the limits of Hall
sensors in existing applications.
• Looking for new approach to design the sensor system with:
Low Power - High Sensitivity
• Integrate a test chip for experimental verification of model
MOTIVATION
INTRODUCTION
GOAL OF THIS PROJECT
• Model of the sensor in the Hall configuration and Current-Mode configuration
• Design of the Current-Mode Sensor and readout circuit
IMS University of Pavia
- A bias voltage across the hall plate sets up a fixed current
- The moving charges in the hall plate are acted upon by the Lorentz force: F=q(VxB)
- In the presence of magnetic field, this force pushes charges to opposite sides of Hall plate
- This signal is cleaned up and amplified to provide a sensitivity in mV/A
How Hall Effect Devices Work
The Hall Effect was discovered by E. F. Hall in 1879.
INTRODUCTION
The cross-shaped structure of Hall device is
optimized to reduce Hall offset and improve
sensitivity.
IMS University of Pavia
STATE-OF-THE-ART IN CMOS HALL EFFECT MAGNETIC SENSORSINTRODUCTION
Over the last decade there were four major
achievements in the development of Hall effect
magnetic sensors in CMOS technology:
• increase of magnetic resolution,
• development of monolithic three dimensional (3D)
Hall effect sensors,
• increase of sensors’ bandwidth,
• and stabilization of sensors’ sensitivity and offset
drift.
IMS University of Pavia
New Approach for Problems of Conventional Hall DevicesINTRODUCTION
PROBLEMS OF CONVENTIONAL HALL DEVICES
• OFFSET
• SENSITIVITY
• POWER
Conventional Hall-Effect Device New Idea: Current Differences approach
IMS University of Pavia
SPIN SPLIT CURRENT HALL PLATE
• Input Current is rotated, while the Current
output is summed during spinning
• Symmetrical offsets are canceled out
• Spinning-current conventional Hall sensor
offset 10-100µT
SPINNING CURRENT
IMS University of Pavia
HALL SENSOR OFFSET REDUCTIONSPINNING CURRENT
• Offset drift of electronics must be lower than 25nV
• CMOS Amplifiers exhibit a typical offset of 1mV and corresponding drift
• Offset and drift reduction methods:
– Chopper instrumentation amplifier(10µV)
– Charge-injection dead band(200nV)
– A nested chopper architecture(100nV)
Combine them all
IMS University of Pavia
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND HALL EFFECT DEVICES
RESEARCH STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
IMS University of Pavia
SENSOR ARCHITECTURESYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
1. the Hall device level
2. the front end level comprising the
device and interface electronics
3. system level topology with
optimization of analog building
blocks.
IMS University of Pavia
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND HALL EFFECT DEVICES
RESEARCH STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
IMS University of Pavia
RESEARCH STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION
ARCHITECTURE STUDY FOR THE HALL EFFECT SENSORS
COMSOL SIMULATION
VERILOG-A MODELING AND SIMULATION
TRANSISTOR LEVEL IMPLEMENTATION
LAYOUT, TAPEOUT AND MEASUREMENT
RESEARCH STATUS
IMS University of Pavia
TOP PLATE INPUT AND OUTPUT CURRENTS
COMSOL SIMULATION
Magnetic Field Current [uA]
Bz [Hz] A,B C D0 12 6 6
0.001 12 6.00033 5.999670.002 12 6.00067 5.999330.003 12 6.001 5.9990.004 12 6.00133 5.998670.005 12 6.00166 5.998340.006 12 6.002 5.9980.007 12 6.00233 5.997670.008 12 6.00266 5.997340.009 12 6.00299 5.997010.01 12 6.00333 5.99667
0.011 12 6.00366 5.996340.012 12 6.00399 5.996010.013 12 6.00432 5.995680.014 12 6.00466 5.995340.015 12 6.00499 5.995010.016 12 6.00532 5.994680.017 12 6.00565 5.994350.018 12 6.00599 5.994010.019 12 6.00632 5.993680.02 12 6.00665 5.99335
IMS University of Pavia
COMSOL SIMULATION
AVERAGE TOP PLATE AFTER SPINNING-CURRENT
First Output AV1 = C1 + D2 + A3 + B4Second Output AV2 = D1 + A2 + B3 + C4
Magnetic Field Current [A]
Bz [Hz] AV1 AV20 24 24
0.001 24.00133 23.998670.002 24.00266 23.997340.003 24.00399 23.996010.004 24.00532 23.994680.005 24.00665 23.993350.006 24.00798 23.992020.007 24.00931 23.990690.008 24.01064 23.989360.009 24.01197 23.988030.01 24.0133 23.9867
0.011 24.01463 23.985370.012 24.01597 23.984030.013 24.0173 23.98270.014 24.01863 23.981370.015 24.01996 23.980040.016 24.02129 23.978710.017 24.02262 23.977380.018 24.02395 23.976050.019 24.02528 23.974720.02 24.02661 23.97339
IMS University of Pavia
COMSOL SIMULATION
* Initial Spinning Current** Average of π/2 Rotation
*** Average of π Rotation**** Average of Overall Spinning
DIFFERENCE AVERAGE BOTH PLATE AFTER SPINNING-CURRENT
Diff1 = AV1(Top Plate) + AV2(Bottom Plate)Diff2 = AV2(Top Plate) + AV1(Bottom Plate)
IMS University of Pavia
DIFFERENCE AVERAGE BOTH PLATE AFTER SPINNING-CURRENTCOMSOL SIMULATION
MagneticField Current (uA)
Bz(T) Diff1(uA) Diff2(uA)0 -1.92E-06 1.92E-06
0.001 0.00317 -0.003170.002 0.00634 -0.006340.003 0.00952 -0.009520.004 0.01269 -0.012690.005 0.01586 -0.015860.006 0.01903 -0.019030.007 0.0222 -0.02220.008 0.02538 -0.025380.009 0.02855 -0.028550.01 0.03172 -0.03172
0.011 0.03489 -0.034890.012 0.03807 -0.038070.013 0.04124 -0.041240.014 0.04441 -0.044410.015 0.04758 -0.047580.016 0.05076 -0.050760.017 0.05393 -0.053930.018 0.0571 -0.05710.019 0.06027 -0.060270.02 0.06344 -0.06344
Diff1 = AV1(Top Plate) + AV2(Bottom Plate)Diff2 = AV2(Top Plate) + AV1(Bottom Plate)
IMS University of Pavia
VERILOG-A IMPLEMENTATION OF HALL DEVICEVERILOG-A IMPLEMENTATION
MAGNETIC FIELD COMSOL VERILOG-A
BZ [mT] ID [uA] IC [uA] ID [uA] IC [uA]
0 mT 6 6 6 6
10 mT 6.0033 5.99667 6.003373 5.996627
20 mT 6.00665 5.99335 6.006746 5.993254
* Input current to IA,B=12uA
IMS University of Pavia
Op-Amp for 180nm CMOS Technology
Parameter Symbol [Unit] Value Parameter Symbol [Unit] Value
TECHNOLOGY CMOS 180nm DC GAIN Av [dB] 82
POWER SUPPLY VDD [V] 1.8 UNIT FREQUENCY GBW [MHz] 17.6
LOAD CONDITION CL [fF] 250 PHASE MARGIN ΦM [Degree] 60
OP-AMP
IMS University of Pavia
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND HALL EFFECT DEVICES
RESEARCH STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
IMS University of Pavia
CONCLUSION
• The research activities started by modeling the Hall sensor with optimized cross-shaped
hall plate to reduce Hall offset and improve sensitivity. A novel technique for current
injection has been developed for saving power and improving the sensitivity of the sensor.
• The model has been simulated at the first using COMSOL Multiphysics. After that the model
has been then implemented in Verilog-A description language, for behavioral simulations in
the Cadence environment.
• The readout circuit consists of an Op-Amp that behaves like an integrator, two Hall plates,
the bias circuit and the Common Mode Feedback (CMFB). In order to eliminate the
dynamic offset cancellation technique through Hall current spinning is applied.
• The achieved results improve the state-of-the-art conventional Hall sensors in consumed
power and sensitivity.
• After the sensor modeling, the activity is now focused on the transistor level design in a
0.18 µm CMOS technology.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
IMS University of Pavia
FUTURE WORK AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
FUTURE WORK:
• Layout and doing the chip measurements
OTHER ACTIVITIES:• “Galvanic Insulated Data Transmission via Short Range Magnetic Coupling”, Report
within University project and STMicroelectronics, May 2012.
COURSE:• TOM 2012• RFIC Workshop Istanbul• PhD Seminars
CREDITS: 12.2
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK