international pittsburgh coal conference …
TRANSCRIPT
INTERNATIONAL PITTSBURGH COAL
CONFERENCE
PRESENTATION ON
INDIA’S COAL SITUATION AND TATA’S ROLE
Authored by: Anjan Bhattacharya & P.K. Murthy
Presented by: R Srinivasan
27th Sept 2006
2
INDIAN SCENARIO
3
IMPORTANCE OF COAL IN INDIA
Hydro 6%
Nuclear 1%
Coal 54%
Oil 30%
Natural Gas 9%
Hydro 6%
Nuclear 6%
Coal 28%
Oil 37%
Natural Gas
23%
PRIMARY ENERGY SOURCE INDIAN SCENARIO
PRIMARY ENERGY SOURCE WORLD SCENARIO
4
SECTORWISE UTILISATION OF COAL IN INDIA
72%
12%
9% 6%
1%
Power
Steel Making
Cement
Fertiliser
Others
Utilization pattern expected to remain same through next decade
5
COAL & LIGNITE RESERVES IN INDIA
79.325
16.541
106.316
13.453
35.564
35.958
0
50
100
150
200
250
Non-CokingCoal
Coking coal Lignite
x 10
3 M
illio
n To
nnes Inferred
IndicatedProved
221.205
32.096
6
COAL PRODUCTION & DEMANDM
illio
n To
nnes
430.28 408.96
622 564.32
1050 1012
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2006-07 2011-12 2025-26Year
Demand
Production
Non-coking CoalShortfall2006-07: 21.52 MT2011-12: 57.68 MT2025-26: 38.00 MT
7
Mill
ion
Tonn
es
42.7 18.54 54 29.2797 49
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2006-07 2011-12 2025-26Year
Demand
Production
Coking Coal
COAL PRODUCTION & DEMAND
Shortfall2006-07: 24.16 MT2011-12: 24.73 MT2025-26: 48.00 MT
8
COAL PRODUCTION & DEMAND
• India is 3rd largest producer of coal
• India has about 10% of world coal reserves.
• At the current rate of production coal has an R/P ratio of more than 200 years (proved reserves)
9
COAL CLASSIFICATION IN INDIA
3064 – 3814G
3814 - 4469F
4469 - 5042E
5042 - 5447D
5447 - 5997C
5997 - 6406B
> 6406A
GCV with 6% moisture, kCal/kgGradeNon-coking Coal
10
COAL CLASSIFICATION IN INDIA
Ash + Moisture > 18% & < 24%IIAsh + Moisture ≤ 19%ISemi coking> 28% & < 35%IV> 24% & < 28%III> 21% & < 24%II> 18% & < 21%IWashery> 15% & < 18%IIAsh content ≤ 15%ISteel
PropertiesGradeType
Coking Coal
11
COAL MINES IN INDIA
(1) Eastern Coalfields Ltd. (2) Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (3) Central Coalfields Ltd.(4) Northern Coalfields Ltd. (5) Western Coalfields Ltd. (6) South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. (7) Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (8) North Eastern Coalfields
(9) Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd.
(10) Neyveli Lignite Corpn.
12
COAL MINING
• Predominantly opencast mining
• Reasons:
Largely shallow reserve
Better production rate
Greater safety
• Considerable mechanization to meet demand growth
13
COAL MININGPolicy Initiatives
• 100% mechanized mining by 2017
• Amendments to coal mines nationalization policy to allow
Private participation
Sell by captive miners to other consumers
14
TYPICAL PROXIMATE ANALYSIS
> 1150> 1300> 1400
Ash fusion temperature in reducing atmosphere, 0C- Initial deformation temp- Softening temp - Hemispherical temp/Fluid temp
45 - 60Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI)3000 - 5000Gross Calorific Value (GCV), kCal/kg< 0.7Sulphur , % by wt18 – 40Fixed carbon, % by wt17 – 30Volatile matter, % by wt25 – 45Ash, % by wt6 – 20Moisture, % by wt
AS RECEIVED BASIS - GRADES E, F & G
15
CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIAN COAL
Low slagging and fouling potential
•Base to acid ratio < 0.3 & low sulphur and low alkali content
More coal inputExpensive coal & ash handling systemBurden on coal transportSolid waste management problem
• Low GCV & High ash
Environment friendly•Low sulphur
16
CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIAN COAL
Highly abrasive and erosiveLower flue gas velocity in boiler convective passLower life of wearable parts in coal mills
• High silica and quartz content in ash
Non corrosive• Low sulphur and negligible chlorine content
17
COAL BENEFICIATION
• Mandated for plants beyond 1000 km or more from mines
• Obstacles to coal washing
Availability of proven technology to handle high ash coal
Loss of carbon during washing increases coal demand
Additional capital investment
• Presently adopted mainly for coking coal to limit ash content
• Expected to play a major role in the years ahead
18
COAL TRANSPORT
58%
20%
17%
5%
Indian Railways
MGR
Road
Others incl coastal shipping
19
LOGISTICS - PORTS
Coal handling capacity needs to more than double
in the next five years
25
7986
32.8
44.2
16.6
27.831.7
36.1
20.5
44.244.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000-01 2004-05 2009-10 2011-12
Mill
ion
Tonn
es InternalTradeImports
HandlingCapacity
Traffic and Handling Capacity
20
AVERAGE PITHEAD COAL COST
Grade-E
Grade-F
Grade-G
0100200300400500600700800900
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006Year
Rup
ees p
er T
onne
21
COST COMPARISON
6000 kCal/kg4000 kCal/kgAverage GCV
≈ USD 2.1≈ USD 2.1Cost per MBtu heating value
-≈ USD 17/t Railway freight for 1000 km
≈ USD 50/t≈ USD 32/t Landed cost at site at 1000 km away
-≈ USD 15/t Pithead coal cost
Imported coalDomestic coal
22
DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES
• Thrust on Coal Bed Methane and Abandoned Mine Methane Projects
• Coal Gasification Projects
23
COAL USE BY TATA COMPANIES
Major coal users amongst the Tata Group of Companies are
• Tata Steel Co. – Mainly coking coal – Domestic & imported
• Tata Power Co. – Non coking coal – Domestic & imported
• Tata Chemicals – Coking & Non coking coal – Imported
24
COAL USE BY TATA COMPANIES
TATA STEEL
• Only Private Co. to own coking coal mines in India
• Installed India’s first coal beneficiation plant
• Continuously improving coal beneficiation techniques to handle higher ash content coal and to achieve better yield
OTHER INITIATIVES
• Planning by Tata Group to set up a plant using washery middlingsand mine ventilated air as fuel
25
WAY FORWARD
• Power sector growth will continue to drive coal demand
• Regulations would be the key factor determining the domestic supply
• Imports would play a major role
• Captive mining would be a major growth area
• New technology initiatives like CBM, CTL, IGCC would have serious considerations
26
THANK YOU