isbn: 978-602-71993-4-7 - seminar... · 2018. 7. 9. · international seminar “quality assurance...

International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015

i

ISBN: 978-602-71993-4-7


ii

Perpustakaan Nasional : Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT) International Seminar on Education Management “Quality Assurance on

Education Services” 2015

ISBN: 978-602-71993-4-7

Yogyakarta : Pascasarjana UST Pres, 2015

260 halaman

PROCEEDING

International Seminar on Education Management

Gedung Pascasarjana Pendidikan Lantai II

Jl. Kusumanegara 157 Yogyakarta

Telp. : 0274564369 Email : [email protected]

Education Management of Directorate Post Graduate Program

Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa UniversityYogyakarta

Copyright©2015

©HAK CIPTA DILINDUNGI OLEH UNDANG - UNDANG

mailto:[email protected]


iii

Proceeding International Seminar on Education Management “Quality Assurance on Education

Services” 2015

Publishing Institute

Education Management of Directorate Post Graduate Program University of

Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta

Director of Publication

Dr. Mundilarno, M.Pd.

Board of Reviewers

Prof. Dr. Supriyoko, M.Pd.

Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, M.Pd.

Dr. Wileus Purbonuswanto, M.Pd

Dr. Nanang Subekti, M.Pd.

Yuyun Yulia, M.Pd, Ph.D.

Editors

Dr. Wileus Purbonuswanto, M.Pd

Dr. Nanang Subekti, M.Pd.

Yuyun Yulia, M.Pd, Ph.D.

Dr. Sunarto, M.Si.

Lay Out

Dr. Wileus Purnuswanto, M.Pd

Iswanto Apri Nugroho, A.Md

Address

Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University Yogyakarta

ISSN: 978-602-71993-4-7

Website: www.mpd.ustjogja.ac.id

E-mail: [email protected]

All right reserved. No part or all of this publication may be reproduced without the

prior written permission of Education Management of Directorate Post Graduate

Program - Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University Yogyakarta. All articles in this

proceeding are not the official opinions and standings of editors. Contents and

consequencies resulted from the articles are responsibilities of individual writers.

http://www.mpd.ustjogja.ac.id/mailto:[email protected]


iv

BACKGROUND

The quality of education is the need of every one. Based on this believe,

goverment and all of the education institution must effort to improve the quality of

education in Indonesia.Implementation of Curriculum 2013 and many others

programsin education and on schools of all level in Indonesia are the effort of the

goverment to improve the quality of education. For these reasons, all of the

educational institution must ensure the quality educational by a good management

services i.e by developing teachers competencies, teaching learning strategies,

completing the the fascilities, networking, etc.

Based on the fact that quality is a complex and dinamic, ensuring program

must be develop in every eduacational institution to ensure it. Workshop,

seminars, and the likes are needed regularly by educational stakeholders, schools,

higher educations institutions, and goverment.

On the basis of the above consideration, lectures, principals, teachers,

parents, and studentsmay identify problems in teaching learning daily and

programs which can overcome its. However education quality assurence, is not

easy problem and must be overcome by good management!


v

FOREWORD

Acreditation on all af educational institution (schools and high education

insttitutions) has been executed by goverment since three dacades later. Also, in

2014 the Ministry of Education and Culture of government has established the

policy to implement curriculum of 2013 for elementary and intermediate

education in Indonesia. These programs and many others showed that gowerment

has very seriusly attentions in improving the quality education.

It also has means that schools and all of educational institutions must be

ready to implement all af the goverment policies in improving quality education

especialy curriculum of 2013. Basically, goverment need and effort to ensure all

of community can aksess the quality of education.

Dinamic and complex are the two principle characteristics of thequality of

education. So, effort to improve it need creativity in management of the

institution. In general, assuring the educational quality seems to be a new and

difficult thing for the teachers and of the institutions. So, several problems and

obstacles may appear in its practice. The teachers and lectures have to develop

creativity and teaching-learning strategies by improving selves continously.

Based to the above circumstances, the Study Program of Education

Management, Post Graduate Program of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University

Yogyakarta (Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta) conduct the

international seminar on the theme “Quality Assurance on Education Services”.

By having this seminar, the participants are expected to possess the knowledge

and skills to develop and to apply the educational manegement especialy in

assuring the education quality.

Yogyakarta, January17, 2015

Head of Committee

Dr. Mundilarno, M.Pd


vi

CONTENTS: pages

Title i

Background ii

Foreword iii

Content iv

Paper Presenter

DETERMINANTSOF PROCESSQUALITYANDGRADUATES QUALITY

Kardoyo (1-19)

THE DEVELOPMENT OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION MANAGEMENT

MODEL TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF PRINCIPALS AND

TEACHERS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Munawir Yusuf (19-32)

THE IMPORTANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS IN PUBLIC

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTRETEP DISTRICT TEMANGGUNG REGENCY

Walminto, Slamet Hidayat (33-39)

DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESMENT INSTRUMENT TO ASSES RELIGIOUS

VALUE OF STUDENTS IN SCIENCE CLASS OF STATE JUNIOR HIGH

SCHOOL 4 YOGYAKARTA

Tusidi Karyono (40-47)

SERVICE MANAGEMENT OF PACKAGE B PROGRAM ON QUALITY

CULTURE IN SANGGAR ACTIVITY IN GORONTALO CITY Dr. Abdul Rahmat, M. Pd (48-60)

THE PRINCIPAL’S TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP MODEL OF

PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

Sitti Hartinah (61-78)

LEARNING MANAGEMENT OF AMONG SYSTEM TO DEVELOP

ACADEMIC ATTITUDE OF PHYSICS’ STUDENTS

Dr. Sumadi, M.Pd (79-87)

THE QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH

ACCREDITATION

Dr. M.Th. Sri Rejeki Retnaningdyastuti, M.Pd, (88-96)

Drs. G. Rohastono Ajie, M.Pd.

EFFECTIVENESS OF TEMPLATE PROGRAM TO FACILITATE TEACHERS

IN DEVELOPING MULTIMEDIA INTERACTIVE LEARNING (MIL)

Siswanto (97-107)


vii

DO LOCAL GOVERNMENT CARES ABOUT THE QUALITY OF

EDUCATION

Nurkolis, Yovitha Yuliejantiningsih (108-116)

QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENTIN HIGHER

EDUCATION

Sunandar (117-125)

INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND LEARNING OUTCOME OF

ENGLISH SUBJECT APPLYING ROLE PLAY METHOD OF TENTH GRADE

STUDENTS OF ACCOUNTING 2 AT SMK N 2 SEMARANG SECOND

SEMESTER OF ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014

Sri Mulyani (126-137)

THE IMPROVEMENT OF ACTIVITY AND LEARNING OUTCOME OF CIVIS

EDUCATION IN THE MAIN MATERIAL OF “KAIDAH FUNDAMENTAL

BANGSAKU” THROUGH LEARNING MODEL APPLICATION OF “GADIS

SENSI” FOR TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF OFFICE ADMINISTRATION

AT SMK N 2 SEMARANG, FIRST SEMESTER ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015

Sholihin (138-149)

FACTORSAND STRATEGYEDUCATIONMANAGEMENTAS

EDUCATIONQUALITYIMPROVEMENTEFFORTS

Teguh Tri Wasono (150-161)

TEACHER’S CREATIVITY: THE KEY OF PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATION

QUALITY

Sefin Umi Latifah (162-168)

TEACHER DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN THE IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS

OF EDUCATION QUALITY

Siti Haryati (169-177)

RESPONSE OF NON-FORMAL EDUCATOR ON THE ECHO OF

CERTIFICATION

Misran Rahman (178-182)

THE ROLE OF COOPERATIVE MODEL LEARNING IN DEVELOPING

CHARACTER EDUCATION IN SOCIAL SKILLS

R. Pramono (183-189)

CULTURAL ASPECTS IN QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATION

SERVICES

Dr. Mundilarno, M.Pd (190-197)


viii

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT

LEARNING ELECTRICITY MAGNET WITH ACCULTURATION NONTONI

(OBSERVATION), NITENI (WHEREAS), NEROKE (IMITATING), AND

NAMBAHI ( ADD ) COOPERATIVE MODEL APPROACH, AND

DOCUMENTATION EXPERIMENT STUDY ON STUDENTS EDUCATION

SEMESTER THREE PHYSICAL THE FACULTY EDUCATION

SARJANAWIYATA TAMANSISWA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA

Dr. Sunarto, M.Si. (198-208)

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STAD AS LEARNING MODEL IN HISTORY

LESSON WITH MAIN MATERIAL “ SNATCH BACK WEST IRIAN “ OF IX

CHLASS STUDENTS AT SMP NEGERI 34 SEMARANG SECOND

Rishati (209-221)

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTINUOUS GUIDANCE AS EFFORT TO

IMPROVE THE TEACHER’S COMPETENCE IN COMPILING LEARNING

PLAN IN SD N SIDOMULYO 04 EAST UNGARAN SEMARANG

Dr. Welius Purnonuswanto, M.Pd. (222-230)

INTERNALIZATION OF ACADEMIC CULTURAL QUALITY TO BE AN

EXCELLENT UNIVERSITY BASED ON TAMANSISWA PERSPECTIVE

Dr. Siti Mariah, M.Pd. (231-239)

EVALUATION OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR SLOW

LEARNERS IN SD NEGERIPULUTAN 02 SALATIGA Yanuet Indah Z.T, Bambang S. Sulasmono (240-252)

PERFORMANCE OF BASIC EDUCATION THE ACHIEVEMENT OF EDUCATION

FOR ALL IN SALATIGA – INDONESIA

Bambang Ismanto (253-260)


198

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT

LEARNING ELECTRICITY MAGNET WITH ACCULTURATION

NONTONI (OBSERVATION), NITENI (WHEREAS), NEROKE

(IMITATING), AND NAMBAHI ( ADD ) COOPERATIVE MODEL

APPROACH, AND DOCUMENTATION EXPERIMENT STUDY ON

STUDENTS EDUCATION SEMESTER THREE PHYSICAL THE FACULTY

EDUCATION SARJANAWIYATA TAMANSISWA UNIVERSITY

YOGYAKARTA

By: Sunarto

University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta

Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

The objective study to . Knowing the quality assurance and effectiveness of

student learning outcomes in the cognitive competence , psychomotor , and effective

with acculturation models nontoni ( observation ) , neteni ( remembering ) , neroke (

imitating ) , ( 4 ) nambahi ( add ) on activities , namely : ( 1 ) learning cooperative , (

2 ) conducting experiments , and ( 3 ) report experiments .

Subjects were learning quality assurance management magnetic electricity

in the third semester student number 39 students . The location of research is in the

Physical Education Studies Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Sciences University Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa . This data collection techniques use

the instrument objective multiple choice test , observation sheet Likert scale models ,

and documentation . Qualitative data analysis technique is to determine the

effectiveness of the quality assurance and learning outcomes of students in courses

magnetic electricity .

Results of research on learning with acculturation models notoni , neteni ,

neroke and nambahi using cooperative learning approach , experiment , and

documentation of student reports obtained an average score of 83.45 entry predicate

good or trustworthy . In order for the result to be very trustworthy increase expected

no improvement in the management of cooperative learning , experiment equipment,

coaching in preparing the trial reports , and worksheets student learning .

Keywords : assurance , quality , effective , acculturation , learning , electricity ,

magnetism .

INTRODUCTION

Background. Management of quality assurance and effectiveness of student

learning outcomes in physical education courses, namely : efficient, effective, and

quality is an issue that cannot easily be solved. Ki Hadjar Dewantara with learning

neteni models, neroke and nambahi ( Tri - N ) and can be increased to nontoni,

neteni, neroke, and nambahi ( Chess - N ) can be practiced in the study of magnetic

electricity.

mailto:[email protected]


199

Use of Chess - N learning in students of physics education programs can be studied

with the cooperative model approach, experiment, experiment report can provide a

guarantee to produce effective learning, efficient, quality , and the goal is reached.

Cooperative learning, the principle of implementation is the group consisting of

three members to five members in activities with an issue or topic part of the

material physics learning . Cooperative learning model is able to use the model

Chess - N to be able to solve the problem to be solved simultaneously in each group.

Learning the group practice model that will be more efficient and effective in terms

of a limited number of practical tools, time, place can be conditioned room that can

be implemented for the competence of students in cognitive, psychomotor affective

and can be obtained after completion of learning experiences . Management of

quality assurance of learning with acculturation and this model has never been done

research in Physics Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training and

Education at the University of Sarjanawinyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarata , therefore

this study with the title above.

Problem formulation : How Knowing the quality assurance and effectiveness of

student learning outcomes in the cognitive competence , affective , and psychomotor

nontoni acculturation model (observation), neteni (remembering), neroke (imitating),

(4) nambahi (add) on activities, namely : (1) cooperative learning, (2) conducting

experiments, and (3) report experiments. The objective study to. Knowing the

quality assurance and effectiveness of student learning outcomes in the cognitive

competence, psychomotor, and effective with acculturation models nontoni

(observation), neteni (remembering), neroke (imitating), (4) nambahi (add) on

activities, namely : (1) learning cooperative, (2) conducting experiments, and (3)

report experiments.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Acculturation Learning. Acculturation practical learning by teaching Ki Hajar

Dewantara is Tri - N , namely : niteni, Neroke, and nambahi and in this study plus

one word nontoni making it into a chess - N , namely : (1) Nontoni, (2) Neteni ,

Neroke and nambahi so shortened to Chess - N ( Ki . B. Boentarsono et al, 2012: 20

) . Based on the researchers understanding of Chess - N can be defined : (1) Nontoni


200

(observation), it means to make observations like what scientists using human senses

carefully or thoroughly, (2) Neteni (understand), meaning : to know, said, contrasted,

identify, demonstrate, attitudes, skills, character, and can show his form as a whole

of an object, (3) Neroke (repeat), meaning : repeats with repeated so that really can

do repetitions quickly, precisely and correctly so as to shown to be skilled in the

repeat behavior (neroke). Repeating this meant a person or student to own :

knowledge (cognitive), skills (psychomotor), and attitude (affective) , and (4)

nambahi (add), meaning that after learning activities nontoni, neteni, neroke and

neroke can improve the quality assurance of the results learning , among others for

example: basic theory, the concept of science, scientific principles, laws of science

that already exist or are be learned so it gets added value of prior knowledge. The

added value obtained after performing the learning process of the Tri - N, can

perform, among others : proposals, suggestions, creative, innovative, application,

development, and made possible the discovery of the laws of the new science.

Quality . Quality itself has changed a lot of criteria that continuously (Tjiptono and

Diana : 2003: 2). Quality means must meet established standards and based on the

National Standards for Higher Education ( SNPT ), about the competency standards

of Article 5 paragraph (1) competency standards are minimum criteria concerning

the qualifications of graduates capabilities that include attitudes, knowledge, and

skills that are expressed in the formulation of achievement learning (Regulation of

the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number : 49 ;

2014: 5). So the quality is dynamic based on the criteria at the time and always

follow the demands of society and the development of science and technology at the

time. So the quality assurance undergraduate level college graduates bail is

competency standards with minimum criteria of competence and qualifications of

graduates include attitudes, knowledge, and skills that are expressed in the

formulation of learning outcomes.

Cooperative Learning Model. Model of cooperative learning model of STAD

(Studen Team Achievement Division) by Robert Slavin of the University Johns

Hopkins USA. In general the method of application of STAD model in the class are :

(1) the class is divided into several groups, (2) each student group consists of 4-5

people who are hiterogen, both in terms of ability, gender, culture, and so on, (3) of


201

each group were given teaching materials and learning tasks that must be done, (4)

the groups are encouraged to study the teaching materials and tasks of learning

through discussion groups, (5) during the learning process as a group facilitator and

lecturer role as a motivator, (6) every week or two weeks, lecturers carry out the

evaluation, either individually or in groups to determine the learning progress of

students, and (7) for the students of the group of students who scored a perfect

learning outcomes rewarded. Similarly, if all groups scored a perfect learning

outcomes, then the whole group shall be rewarded (Made Wena, 2011: 192).

Essence of Learning Model . The term learning model by Kardi and Nur (2000 : 9 )

, is a learning model has a broader meaning than the strategies, methods, or

procedures. Teaching model has four special features that are not owned by the

strategies , methods, or procedures. These characteristics , are : (1 ) theoretical

rational logical compiled by the creator or developer ; (2) the rationale of what and

how great student learning ( learning objectives to be achieved ) ; (3) the behavior of

teaching required so that the model can be implemented successfully ; and (4)

learning environment that is necessary for learning objectives that can be achieved.

According Trianto (2010 : 53) learning model function here is to guide teachers and

teachers designer and lecturer in implementing the learning . As noted by Joyce and

Weil (1992 : 4) that the learning model is a plan or a pattern that is used as a

planning learning in the classroom or learning tutorials and to determine learning

tools such as books, movies, computers, etc. Based on some of the opinions about

the learning model , eventually learning model is covering the planning, design,

stage, guidelines, environmental, student products, quality of the learning outcomes ,

efficiency , and effectiveness to achieve the objectives to be achieved include

covering aspects of competence, namely : cognitive, psychomotor, and affective . So

learning model chosen must be able to produce the quality assurance of the learning

outcomes or college graduates .

Learning Model Experiments . The learning model experimental physics , can not

be separated from the nature of science learning among others physics . Based on

the results of various scientific discovery by humans in principle that science stems

from the curiosity of man, of the making of human curiosity is always observed on

natural phenomena that exist and try to understand it. Physics is a part of science or

science which was originally derived from the English science. The word science


202

own comes from the Latin word meaning scentia I know. Science consists of the

social sciences ( social science ) and natural science ( natural science ) . Kardi and

Nur (1994 : 1), the physics of nature is knowledge about the world of matter, both

animate and inanimate beings who observation. Conclusion that physics is a

collection of systematic theory, general applicability is limited to the phenomena of

nature, born and developed through scientific methods such as observation and

experimentation as well as demanding scientific attitudes such as curiosity, open,

honest, and so on.

Taxonomy of Learning Objectives . Beyamin taxonomy of learning objectives

according to Bloom and D. Krathwohl (1964 : 20), is that there are three aspects of

competence, namely : cognitive , affective , and psychomotor . Cognitive aspects ,

has regional levels, namely : (1) knowledge ( word operational special purpose :

preparing, copying, naming certain objects, register, memorize, say, sort. To know,

and reconnected), (2) understanding (word specific operational objectives : classify,

describe, discuss, explain, express, define, allocate, report, admitted, dropping,

selecting, states, and translate), (3) the application (having said special operations :

apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, work , create illusions , interpret , operate ,

trainin , scheduling, sketching, solving, and admitted, (4) analysis (special purpose

operational word : counting, to categorize, compare, contracting, criticize , make

diagrams , differentiate , treat others , test , try , inventory, ask , test , and make

another), (5) synthesis (said operational specific objectives : organize, summarize,

collect, organize composition, build, create, design, formulate, organize, organize,

plan, prepare, propose, formulate, and writing ), and ( 6 ) evaluation ( special

purpose operational word : argument, correcting, attach, choose, compare, defend,

estimate, decide , think, guess, assume, given the value , choose , support , assess ,

and evaluating).

Learning Effectiveness . Understanding Learning Effectiveness General Dictionary

Indonesian According effectiveness is defined : ( 1 ) has effect , influence , or result ,

and ( 2 ) provide satisfactory results . Effectiveness means that the effect of the

nature or circumstances or results to ( JS Badudu , 1974: 371 ) . Effectiveness is the

derivation of effective word in the English language effective defined simply "

coming into use" ( Oxford Learner 's Pocket Dictionary , 2003: 138 ) . Effectiveness

in Encyclopedia as a Administration follows: " a situation that implies about the


203

desired effect or result . If a person acts with intent to do something specific , which

is desired , then the person is said to be effective if it pleases consequences of it . " (

The Liang Gie , 1989: 108 ) . According Steers (1985 : 176 ) , that : " an

organization that is truly effective is the one who is able to create an atmosphere

where workers work not only carry out the work which has been charged , but also

create an atmosphere so that workers are more responsible , acting in creative in

order to improve efficiency in order to achieve the goal . " According to the learning

Effectiveness Criteria Hergenhahn & Matthew H Olson ( 208 : 2 ) learning is

measured by the change in behavior . After making the learning process will be able

to do something they could not do before they make the process of learning .

Learning will be effective if it involves physical or mental activity subject students

in the learning process . These activities will increase the mastery of cognitive ,

affective and psychomotor , giving rise to a change in the behavior of the subject

students .

Quality Assurance Results and Learning Physics . Based on the review of the

above theory , the concept of quality assurance must master competencies student

general there are three aspects ( 1 ) cognitive , ( 2 ) affective , and ( 3 ) psychomotor

and basic competence are : ( 1 ) an electric current induced magnetic field , ( 2 ) the

law Biot and Savart , ( 4 ) Ampere's law , ( 4 ) Faraday's law , ( 5 ) the laws Lenzt ,

and ( 6 ) magnetism . So build the character of students to master the basic

competencies of electric magnets can be done with the process skills . Skills used in

the learning process of students to instill character values of competence , there are

three , among others : ( 1 ) the process of learning by doing physics lab in groups

electric magnet , ( 2 ) develop a magnetic electrical physics lab report individually

with the format : basic theory , formulation of the problem , hypothesis , experiment

planning , experimentation , observation , data collection , data analysis , results ,

conclusions , and applications . ( 3 ) inquiry with the principle of cooperation

teachers and students in terms of : information , question and answer , observation ,

discussion , analysis , synthesis , formulation of the principle of the concept ( theory

) , making inferences , applications and improve the learning interaction .

Knowing the Concept of Quality Assurance and Effectiveness . Based on the

above concept description to know the quality assurance ( meet minimum


204

competency standards ) and effectiveness ( no effect of changing attitudes towards

the subject of the student and the goal is reached ) after the student success through

skills assessment process is by using three instruments ; ( 1) The objective

questionnaire tests , ( 2 ) observation sheets , and ( 3 ) documentation based on the

report experiments with pre-defined format . Three assessment instrument is based

on lattice indicators of basic competencies mastered and done in the form of action

becomes a habit and it is called acculturation . The results of quality assurance

assessment and effectiveness of student learning outcomes obtained based on test

results of the three instruments . The results of student test scores obtained from the

three instruments , then be assessed with reference to SNPT minimum competence

criteria to assess the quality assurance and effectiveness learning outcomes of

students with predicate : ( 1 ) very good , ( 2 ) good ,(3) enough ( 4 ) less and ( 5 )

very less.

RESEARCH METHODS

This study used a qualitative descriptive approach refers more fenomenalogis

perspective . Research in view fenomenalogis attempt to use the meaning of events

and link - relation to the ordinary people in certain situations ( Moleong , 210 : 9 ) .

Views of its kind , is classified exploratory research on the management of quality

assurance and effectiveness of teaching students with learning civilizing nontoni ,

neteni , neroke , and nambahi the magnetic electrical courses .

Research variables . Learning management research with acculturation nonton ,

neteni, neroke and nambahi have variable ( Y ) as the dependent variable and

independent variables have , namely : ( X1 ) cooperative learning approach , ( X2 )

experimental group learning approach , and ( X3 ) documentation of student

experiments report .

Population , is the sum total of all units or elements which investigators interested .

The population can be either organism , the person or group of people , communities

, organizations , objects , objects , events or reports that everything has a

characteristic and must be specifically defined and not ambiguous ( Ulber Silalahi ,

2009: 253 ) . Sample , the majority of the population is selected for the data source (

Suhardi , 2008: 54 ) . The studies all members of the population will make the

sample , ie as a subject of study . Research place , is in the Physical Education

Studies Program , Faculty of Education and Science University Sarjanawiyata


205

Tamansiswa education . The study begins planning , implementation , and prepare a

report takes five months from August to January of 2014 to 2015.

Data Analysis. Qualitative data analysis techniques according to Miles and

Huberman , 1984 ( Sugiyono , 2008: 246 ) activity in data analysis are : data

reduction , the data display and conclusion drawing or verification . In this study ,

after sorting the data in the context of data reduction performed a descriptive

analysis , which gives a description of the object of study based on data from a group

of research subjects . Step execution of data analysis are : ( 1 ) collecting data from

three instruments , ( 2 ) calculate the data in the score ( 3 ) classifies the data scores

on cognitive competence , affective and psychomotor , and ( 4 ) provide an

assessment with criteria score data into categories: : very good , good, fair , less , and

very less and ( 5 ) show the results of the study .

Assessment Criteria. Assessment of learning outcomes pejaminan management

quality and effectiveness of the civilizing nontoni , niteni , neroke , and nambahi

using ideal assessment criteria according Sukardjo category , et al (2006 : 75 ) with

the provision that can be seen in Table 3.1 .

Table 3.1

Criteria for Assessment of Quality and Effectiveness Research

Number

Quantitative Assessment scores

range Categories

Predicate Assessment

Criteria Quality and

Effectiveness

1 k > 83,99 Very Good

2 67,66 < k ≤ 83,99 Good

3 52,01 < k ≤67,66 Enough

4 36,01 < k ≤ 52,01 Less

5 k ≤ 36,01 Very Less

Calculation of Total Score . Calculation of the results of data collection in a score

of three instruments are : ( 1 ) questionnaire ( objective test ) correct answer scores 1

( one ) and one score of 0 ( zero ) and the lowest total score of 0 ( zero ) and the

number of the highest scores of 100 ( one hundred ) ; ( 2 ) the observation with

appropriate alternative answers Likert scale , namely : very good score = 5 , both


206

score = 4 , quite a score = 3 , less scores = 2 , and so less score = 1. The calculation

of the minimum score of 20 ( two twenty ) and the highest score of 100 ( one

hundred ) , and ( 3 ) documentation of reports score calculation experiment with the

lowest score of 20 ( twenty ) and the highest scores of 100 ( one hundred ) .

Research Procedures . The study procedures were : ( 1 ) Preparation : ( a) preparing

lattice indicator assessment instrument , objective tests , observation sheets , reports

the experiment , ( b ) develop assessment instruments , ( c ) preparing a worksheet

experiment students , ( d ) preparing sheet experimental observations , ( e ) prepare a

report compiled format sheet experiment , ( f ) divides the experimental group , ( g )

prepare a schedule of the experiment ; ( 2 ) Implementation : ( a) exercising the test

first before learning process , ( b ) the implementation of a six-time experiment and

observation data retrieval when students perform experiments , ( c ) report the

experimental results of each student , ( d ) pelaksnaan test 2 with the objective test

questions ; ( 3 ) the results of the test score data merekap 1 , test 2 , experiment , and

documentation of student reports , ( 4 ) the assessment of the results of score data by

categories : excellent , good, fair , less , or much less and , ( 5 ) describe the

assessment research results and ( 6 ) prepare research reports .

RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Research Result. Learning outcomes of students with learning civilizing nontoni

models , neteni , neroke , and nambahi , namely : ( 1 ) The cooperative learning in

cognitive competency obtained score : 82.84 entrance predicate good , psychomotor

score of 84.43 entrance predicate obtained excellent , obtained a score of 85.56 entry

psychomotor predicate okay. ( 2 ) Learning experimental group on cognitive

competence obtained good scores predicate 80.50 entry , obtained a score of 80.50

psychomotor , and affective obtained good scores predicate 83.81 entry . And ( 3 )

Learning based documentation report experiments on cognitive competence obtained

score : 84.43 very good , psychomotor score of 85.56 entrance predicate obtained

very good , and affective obtained good scores predicate 83.43 entry .Discussion .

Learning outcomes with civilizing nontoni , niteni , neroke and nambahi do

discussion as follows , namely : ( 1 ) cooperative activities on competency in the

cognitive, psychomotor , and affective average score of 83.61 incoming obtained

good title , it means quality assurance and effectiveness can unbelievable . ( 2 ) The

results of the experimental activities of student competency in the cognitive,


207

psychomotor , and affective obtained an average score of 82.31 get in a good rating ,

meaning that it can be used as an effective quality assurance and good entry

predicate , and ( 3 ) The results of activities based documentation of student

experiments competency report the cognitive, psychomotor , and affective obtained

average score of 84.43 rat entered the predicate excellent , quality assurance and

effectiveness meaning can be very accountable . So the results of research based on

criteria of quality assurance and effectiveness of learning with models notoni , neteni

, neroke and nambahi in all three models of cooperative learning approach ,

experiment , and documentation of student reports obtained an average score of

83.45 entry predicate good , it means quality assurance and effectiveness can be

trusted with either .

CONCLUSION AND ADVICE

Conclusion . ( 1 ) Guarantee the quality and effectiveness of student learning

outcomes of the activities of the experiment ( experiment ) with pembuadayaan

nontoni , neteni , neroke and nambahi on cognitive competence , psychomotor , and

affective enter predicate good , ( 2 ) quality assurance and effectiveness of student

learning outcomes empowerment model nontoni , neteni , neroke and nambahi of

documents report experiments on cognitive competence , psychomotor , and

affective entrance excellent predicate , ( 3 ) Guarantee the quality and effectiveness

of cooperative learning students with acculturation nontoni , neteni , neroke and

nambahi on cognitive aspects of predicate good entry , and ( 4 ) guarantee the

quality and effectiveness of the learning outcomes of students from three

experimental learning activities , documentation reports , and cooperative with the

civilizing nontoni , nambahi , neroke , and nambahi on cognitive competence ,

psychomotor , and affective enter predicate good , it means quality assurance and

effectiveness can be properly accounted for . Suggestions . The results of this study

on the effectiveness of the quality assurance and achieve a good rating and ,

therefore expected no improvement in the management of cooperative learning ,

experiment equipment, coaching in preparing the trial reports , and worksheets

student learning to be very good.


208

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ainen Mohammad, (19780). Penerapan Teori Piaget dalam Pengajaran Science dan

Matematika, FKIE: Yogyakarta.

Dahar, R.M, (1989).Teori Belajar, Jakarta: Erlangga.

E. Mulyasa, (2006). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Bandung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Joyce, Weil, dan Calhoun. (2009), Models of Teaching. New Jesey: Upper Saddle

River.Lie. A. (2002). Cooperative Learning. Jakarata: Gramidia Widiasarana

Indonesia,

Made Wena. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Bumi

Aksara.

Muchlas Samani. (2011). Pendidikan karakter, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Priyanto, (2005). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model Jig Saw Pada Mata

Pelajaran Kimia Siswa Kelas X Aliyah Darut Taqwa, Tesis S2 PPs

UM.

Sedyawati, Edi dkk, (1997). Pedoman Penanaman Budi Pekerti Luhur,, Jakarta: balai

Pustaka.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suyoso, (2008). Listrik Magnet, Yogyakarta: UNY.

Sukarno, N, (1973). Dasar Dasar pendidikan Science, Bandung: Batara.

Sukardjo dan Lis Permana Sari. (2006). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Kimia, Jogyakarta:

FMIPA UNY.

Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Bandung: bumi Aksara.

.............; Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 19 tahun 2005, tentang

Standar Nasional Pendidikan, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Replublik Indonesia.

isbn: 978-602-71993-4-7 - seminar... · 2018. 7. 9. · international seminar “quality assurance...

Documents