jacob fire evaluation
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
1/20
1
Sizing of relief valves forsupercritical fluids
March 23rd, 2011
Overview
Relief Valve Study An Engineering Approach
Relief Calculation for Supercritical Fluids Introduction Theoretical Background Discussion & Evaluation
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
2/20
2
Jacobs
Introduction
Jacobs Introduction: Who Are We
Committed to Be ondZero Safet as safet is our #1priority
Relationship based company
Global resource base 57.500 employees in 25countries on 4 continents
Fortune 500 #1 Engineering & Construction Company
Publicl traded on NYSE
Net income $65,8 Million 1Q FY11 ($246 Million FY10)
Revenues $2,4 Billion 1Q FY11 ($9,9 Billion FY10)
Backlog $13 Billion FY11
In business since 1947
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
3/20
3
Jacobs Introduction: Worldwide offices
Jacobs Introduction: Europe
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
4/20
4
Jacobs Introduction: BelgiumOil & Gas(Refining)
30
Chemicals &Polymers
45
Others12
Pharma& Bio
13
Project Serv. &Admin., 82
Procurement,14
Process, 52
Engineering &Design, 316
Project Mgt., 48
G&A, 31
Constr. Mgt, 26
Civil, 44Mechanical, 31Instrumentation,88Piping, 127Electrical, 26
Jacobs Introduction: Clients
Client Workload Sinc Client Workload Since
/ People e / People
BASF 30-50 2003 SABIC 15-60 2004
Borealis 25-50 2002 Shell 15-60 2007
BPChembel
15-30 2004 Solvay 20-80 2001
ow - o a -
ExxonMobil
15-60 1985 Yara 30-60 2005
GSK 15-20 2004
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
5/20
5
Relief Valve Study
An Engineering Approach
Relief Valve Study An Engineering Approach
P&IDs
Equipment data
Etc.
Define relief scenarios: E.g.: External fire, Blocked outlet, etc.
Use list API 521 as guidance
Use tools as HAZOP, PLANOP, client specific methodsto determine applicable scenarios
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
6/20
6
Relief Valve Study An Engineering Approach
Relief load
Relief valve orifice size
Determine governing case General a roach:
Scenario requiring the largest orifice size
=
Governing case
Relief Valve Study An Engineering Approach
Pressure drop over inlet (< 3% of set pressure)
Pressure at outlet (backpressure):
Superimposed backpressure: static pressure (if variable:NOconventional type valve)
Built-up backpressure: pressure increase as result of relief, .
100% for pilot operated type valves)
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
7/20
7
Relief Valve Study An Engineering Approach
Conventional spring-loaded
Balanced bellows
Pilot operated
Mechanical stress anal sis
Flare network study
Relief Calculation forSupercritical Fluids
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
8/20
8
Introduction
Objective:Calculate mass relief flow, volume relief flow and required orificesize of heat-input driven relief cases on systems with supercriticalrelief temperature and/or pressure.
Examples:
Fire case for a Vessel
Blocked-in Heat Exchanger
References:
R. Ouderkirk, Rigorously Size Relief Valves for Supercritical Fluids,CEP magazine, pp. 34-43 (Aug. 2002).
L. L. Simpson, Estimate Two-Phase Flow in Safety Devices, Chem.Eng., pp. 98-102, (Aug. 1991).
Theoretical Background
Definition of enthal :H = U + pV (1)
dH = dU + Vdp + pdV (2)
dU = Q pdV (3)
Combining (2) & (3)
dH = Q + Vdp (4)
p is constant during relief; hence,
H = Q (5)
And,
H/t = Q (6)
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
9/20
9
Theoretical Background
Heat input = Enthalpy change
Hi (H)p Hi+1
t * Q
i i+1
V/t H: Specific enthalpyV: Specific volumeQ: Heat inputt: Time
Example Case Information
Fire case for a Vessel SP
Process Data (normal operation):
Content: Methane
Crit. Temp. -82,7 C Crit. Press. 45,96 bara
Level: 60% Liquid
Pressure: 10 barg
arg
Temperature: -122 C
Volume: 10 m
Area: 25 mQ
fire
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
10/20
10
Example Case Relief Process Overview
1 2 Heatin before Relief: Isochoric rocess
No volume or mass change (no relief)
2 3 Relief: Isentropic flash
Adiabatic & frictionless flow through relief valve
2 2 Relief Progression: Isobaric processSystem at constant pressure (i.e. relief pressure)
P-E Diagram of M ethane
100
= 10kg/m3
= 100kg/m3
2 2'
+ Qfire
+ Qfire
Density [kg/m] - Temperature [K] - Entropy [kJ/(kgK)]
= 400kg/m3
Relief
Press.
10
Pressure
(ba
r)
= 1kg/m3
1
3 3'
0.1
-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Enthalpy (kJ/ kg)
= 0,1kg/m3
T=100K
T=200K
T=150K
T=300K
T=400K
T=500K
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
11/20
11
Example Case Calculation Steps
Ste 1: Select Pro ert Method
Step 2: GatherRelief Case Information
Step 3: DetermineHeat Input
Step 4: CalculatePhysical Properties
Step 5: CalculateRelief Flow Rate
Step 6a: DetermineIsentropic Choked Nozzle Flux
Step 6b: DetermineRequired Orifice Size
Example Case Step 1
Requirements: Suitable for respective component(s)
Accurate for the relevant pressure and temperature rangeP > 1 // T > 1
Accurate for both liquid and gas properties
Important:Always verify property method with empirical property data!
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
12/20
12
Example Case Step 1
Fit for light hydrocarbons
Application range
Pr: 0 to 10 (up to ca. 460 bara)
Tr: 0,3 to 4 (ca. -216 to 485 C)
One correlation for both liquid as well as vapor phase
No distinguishable transition from supercritical fluid tosupercritical vapor
Integration of the thermal properties with the otherphysical properties
Thermodynamic cohesiveness
Example Case Step 2
GatherRelief Case Information
Relief pressure:
PSV set press.: 50 bargFire case relief press.: 121 %of set pressure
Relief press.: 61,5 bara (Pr= 1,3)
n a re e empera ure:Considering an isochoric process:
(Tini(pini))ini (Trlf(prlf))ini(Tini(10barg))ini (Trlf(61,5barg))ini-122C -77C
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
13/20
13
Example Case Step 3
DetermineHeat In ut
API 521 external pool fire, heat absorption forliquids:
Qfire = 43.200 * f * 0,82With f = 1 (no fireproof insulation / bare metal vessel)
= 25 m
Qfire = 605,05 kW
= 2.178.196 kJ/h: Wetted surface [m]f: Environment factor[-]Q: Heat input [W]
Example Case Step 4
CalculatePhysical Properties
Determine the specific volume (V), specific enthalpy (H) & entropy (S)at initial relief conditions:
Applying property method correlations in Excel spreadsheets
Using property models in Simulation Tools (Pro/II, Aspen Plus, etc.)
At relief pressure
Step size: ca. 3C
# iterations: see later
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
14/20
14
P-E Diagram Methane
100
= 10kg/m3
= 100kg/m3
2 2'
+ Qfire
+ Qfire
Density [kg/m] - Temperature [K] - Entropy [kJ/(kgK)]
= 400kg/m3
10
Pressure
(bar)
= 1kg/m3
1
33'
0.1
-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Etnhalpy (kJ/ kg)
= 0,1kg/m3
T=100K
T=200K
T=150K
T=300K
T=400K
T=500K
Example Case Step 4
T, C S, kJ/(kg.K) H, kJ/kg V, m3/kg
-77 8,742 -288,7 0,00455
-74 8,920 -253,7 0,00527
-71 9,169 -203,7 0,00662
-68 9,341 -168,7 0,00781-65 9,487 -138,7 0,00896
-62 9,582 -118,7 0,00978
-59 9,676 -98,7 0,01062
-56 9 746 -83 7 0 01127, , ,
-53 9,814 -68,7 0,01193
-50 9,882 -53,7 0,01259
-47 9,927 -43,7 0,01303
-41 10,036 -18,7 0,01414
-38 10,079 -8,7 0,01459
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
15/20
15
Example Case Step 5
CalculateRelief Flow Rate
Volumetric flow rate:
Mass flow rate:
H
VQV
= &&
Vm
&
& =
H: Specific enthalpy [kJ/kg]V: Specific volume [m/kg]V: Volume flow [m/s]m: Mass [kg]m: Mass flow [kg/s]Q: Heat input [kW]
Example Case Step 5
T, C S, kJ/(kg.K) H, kJ/kg V, m3/kg V, m3/s m, kg/s
- , - , , , ,
-74 8,920 -253,7 0,00527 0,01427 2,710
-71 9,169 -203,7 0,00662 0,01916 2,891 Max. mass flow
-68 9,341 -168,7 0,00781 0,02227 2,849
-65 9,487 -138,7 0,00896 0,02432 2,714
-62 9,582 -118,7 0,00978 0,02532 2,588
-59 9,676 -98,7 0,01062 0,02602 2,448
- -- , - , , , ,
-53 9,814 -68,7 0,01193 0,02662 2,232
-50 9,882 -53,7 0,01259 0,02674 2,124
-47 9,927 -43,7 0,01303 0,02687 2,061 Max. volume flow
-41 10,036 -18,7 0,01414 0,02686 1,899
-38 10,079 -8,7 0,01459 - -
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
16/20
16
Example Case Step 6
DetermineIsentro ic Choked Nozzle Flux
For each relief temperature calculate the chokednozzle flux:
Iteratively, at decreasing
outlet pressure:( )
b
b0
V
HH2G
=
And, along isentropic path:
Max. flux = Choked flux
b0 SS =
H: Specific enthalpy [J/kg]V: Specific volume [m/kg]G: Mass flux [kg/(m.s)]S: Entropy [kJ/(kg.K)]
0: Inlet condition
b: Outlet condition
P-E Diagram Methane
100
= 10kg/m3
= 100kg/m3
2 2'
+ Qfire
+ Qfire
Density [kg/m] - Temperature [K] - Entropy [kJ/(kgK)]
= 400kg/m3
10
Pressure
(ba
r)
= 1kg/m3
1
33'
0.1
-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Etnhalpy (kJ/ kg)
= 0,1kg/m3
T=100K
T=200K
T=150K
T=300K
T=400K
T=500K
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
17/20
17
Example Case Step 6
Relief tem erature: -68 C
Tb, C pb, bara Vb, m/kg Hb, kJ/kg G, kg/(m.s)
T0, p0: -68 61,5 0,00808 -158,8 -
-72 57,0 0,00840 -162,5 10248
-76 52,5 0,00878 -166,4 14009
-80 48,0 0,00924 -170,4 16496
:
-85 43,5 0,00988 -174,7 18058 GChoked-88 39,0 0,01134 -179,5 17931
-92 34,5 0,01309 -185,0 17479
Example Case Step 6
Iteration = time consumin rocess!!
Alternative method: use simplified correlations to
determine isentropic choked flux J.C. Leung, A Generalized Correlation for One-component
Homogeneous Equilibrium Flashing Choked Flow, AIChE Journal,pp. 1743-1746 (Oct. 1986).
0
0choked
V
pG
=
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
18/20
18
ATTENTION: 2-phase flow
Relief of su ercritical fluids can lead to 2- hase flow!
Homogenous Equilibrium Model (HEM)
Assumptions
1. Velocities of phases are equal
2. Phases are at thermodynamic equilibrium
Formula applies:
And H = xL.HL + (1-xL).HGV = xL.VL + (1-xL).VG
( )b
b0
VHH2G =
H: Specific enthalpy [J/kg]V: Specific volume [m/kg]G: Mass flux [kg/(m.s)]
0: Inlet condition
b: Outlet condition
L: Liquid phase
G: Gas phase
Example Case Step 7
DetermineRe uired Orifice Size
API 521:
With backpressure correction, Kb = 1 (backpressure
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
19/20
19
Example Case Step 7
T, C S, kJ/(kg.K) H, kJ/kg V, m3/kg V, m3/s m, kg/s A, mm
- -- , - , , , ,
-74 8,920 -253,7 0,00527 0,01427 2,710 -
-71 9,169 -203,7 0,00662 0,01916 2,891 153
-68 9,341 -168,7 0,00781 0,02227 2,849 155 Req. Nozzle Size
-65 9,487 -138,7 0,00896 0,02432 2,714 152
-62 9,582 -118,7 0,00978 0,02532 2,588 -
-59 9,676 -98,7 0,01062 0,02602 2,448 -
-56 9 746 -83 7 0 01127 0 02638 2 340 -, , , , ,
-53 9,814 -68,7 0,01193 0,02662 2,232 -
-50 9,882 -53,7 0,01259 0,02674 2,124 141
-47 9,927 -43,7 0,01303 0,02687 2,061 -
-41 10,036 -18,7 0,01414 0,02686 1,899 -
-38 10,079 -8,7 0,01459 - - -
Example Case Results
When all values (relief volume flow, mass flow and nozzle size)decrease with increasing relief temperature: stop iterations.
Determine selected effective orifice (API 526) based on maximum
calculated nozzle size value: Max. nozzle size value: 155 mm
Selected standard orifice: 198 mm (F)
a cu ate pressure rop over n et an sc arge
Determine safety valve type (conventional, balanced bellows, pilotoperated)
-
8/3/2019 Jacob Fire Evaluation
20/20
Calculation Results
100%Volume Relief Rate
70%
80%
90%
Orifice Area
40%
50%
60%
200 210 220 230 240 250
Temperature (K)
Mass Relief Rate
Example Case Conclusions
S ecific calculation method is re uired:
Fluids that are below critical conditions in normal operation
can have super critical relief
Max. mass flow Max. volume flow Min. required nozzlesize
Required nozzle size determined using a simplified method(API 521 5.15.2.2.2): 58 mm vs. 155 mm