jan.hoffmann@unctad geneva, may 2010

76
[email protected] Geneva, May 2010 The demand and supply of The demand and supply of international transport international transport services: services: The relationships between The relationships between trade, transport costs trade, transport costs and effective access to and effective access to global markets global markets

Upload: jayden

Post on 22-Feb-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The demand and supply of international transport services: The relationships between trade, transport costs and effective access to global markets. [email protected] Geneva, May 2010. Trade. Transport Services. Transport costs. More income to finance trade facilitation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

[email protected] Geneva, May 2010

The demand and supply of The demand and supply of international transport services: international transport services: The relationships between trade, The relationships between trade, transport costs and effective access to transport costs and effective access to global marketsglobal markets

Page 2: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

TransportTransportcostscosts

TradeTrade

TransportTransportServicesServices

Page 3: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

More income to finance trade facilitation

-> Better trade facilitation-> More Trade-> More income to finance

trade facilitation

Ango

la

Page 4: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Lower Transport Costs-> More trade-> Economies of scale-> Lower Transport Costs

Page 5: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Better services-> More trade-> More income to

finance infrastructure-> Better services

Suez

Can

al

Page 6: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

More trade-> More shipping supply-> More competition-> lower freights-> More trade

Page 7: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

The challenge:The challenge:

• Avoid a vicious circle, where high transport costs and low service levels discourage trade, which will further endear transport and reduce connectivity…

• Instead: Initiate a virtuous circle

Page 8: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Transport CostsConnectivityTrade

Geneva, May [email protected]

Page 9: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Transport CostsConnectivityTrade

Geneva, May [email protected]

Page 10: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Freight rates in May 2010Freight rates in May 201040’ container from Dalian to • DUBAI 1200 • COLOMBO 1300 • B.ABBAS 1300• CALCUTTA 1700• BAHRAIN 1800 • UM QUASER 3000 • PORT SUDAN 3300• ROTTERDAM 3500• TEMA 4600• SANTOS 4800• VALPARAISO 5200

Page 11: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Freight costs in percent of imports

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Haiti Jamaica Mexico Chile Argentina Antigua and Barbuda

Source: UNCTAD

Freight costs Freight costs for for countriescountries

Page 12: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Per cent of goods' market price

Jute from Bangladesh 12.1% 19.8% 21.2% 44.2%Tea from Sri Lanka 9.5% 9.9% 10.0% 13.4%Coffee from Colombia 4.2% 3.3% 6.8% 2.5%Coca beans from Ghana 2.4% 2.7% 6.7% 3.5%

1970 1980 1990 2007

Freight as % of Freight as % of commoditiescommodities value value

UNCTAD, Review of Maritime Transport

Page 13: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

TransportTransportcostscosts

TradeTradeVolumesVolumes

TransportTransportServicesServices?

Page 14: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 15: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 16: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

y = 0.6206x + 1019.9R2 = 0.2058

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500Distance

Frei

ght r

ate

Freight rates and Freight rates and DistanceDistance in the Caribbean in the Caribbean

UNCTAD Transport Newsletter, 1st Quarter 2007

Page 17: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 18: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Feb 2008 costsFeb 2008 costs 11001100TEUTEU

42504250TEUTEU

87508750TEUTEU

13000TEU

Construction costs million USD

28 77 135 167

Construction costsUSD per TEU

25 000 18 117 15 430 12 850

Crew 15 to 17 15 to 17 15 to 17 15 to 17

Source: Dynamar, 2008, via Antonio Zuidwijk

Page 19: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Economies of ScaleEconomies of Scale

CRS, 25 April 2010

Page 20: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Container ship sizesContainer ship sizes• 27.- US$ saving/ container/ trip

using “post panamax” versus “panamax” (Drewry)

Page 21: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Mergers of shipping companiesMergers of shipping companies• Savings thanks to larger volumes

(Roland & Berger)

0102030405060708090

100

medium large

ships

purchasing

containers

access

admin

Page 22: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Port operationsPort operations

• 12 US$ per move savings with global operatorsDrewry

Page 23: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 24: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

ImbalancesImbalances

CI-Online 10 May 2010

Page 25: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 26: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Merchandize type and valueMerchandize type and value

• Increase the value by 1% implies an increase of transport and insurance costs by around 0.3 – 0.4%

Page 27: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 28: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Competition with land transportCompetition with land transport

• If countries are neighbours, with paved roads, maritimetransport costs are around 10% lower

Fotos: Jan Hoffmann

Page 29: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Competition between carriersCompetition between carriers

• Receiving 20 instead of 5 companies

freights go down by around 12%

Page 30: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Competition between carriersCompetition between carriersCase study CaribbeanCase study Caribbean

• If the company itself has no direct service (i.e. it only has a service with transshipment): This company’s freight rate + $650

• If other, competing, companies do provide a direct service: This companies freight rate - $425

Page 31: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

y = 1814.9e-0.0671x

R2 = 0.4348

0

500

1'000

1'500

2'000

2'500

3'000

3'500

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Number of Carriers providing direct services

Frei

ght r

ate

Source: Hoffmann, Wilmsmeier, IAME 2007

Competition between carriersCompetition between carriersCase study CaribbeanCase study Caribbean

Page 32: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…

1) Distances2) Economies of scale3) Imbalances

4) Type & value of goods5) Competition6) Port characteristics

Page 33: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Port reformPort reform• Difference between

“best” and “worst” case in Latin America: 25% of worst case

Page 34: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Port reformPort reform

Wilmsmeier, Hoffmann, Sanchez, in: Porteconomics, 2006

Page 35: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Better Better port infrastructureport infrastructure reduces maritime transport costsreduces maritime transport costs

Port reformPort reform

Page 36: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Port reformPort reform

Better (perceived)Better (perceived) port efficiencyport efficiency reduces maritime transport costsreduces maritime transport costs

Page 37: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Port reformPort reform

Better Better general transport infrastructuregeneral transport infrastructure does NOT reduce maritime transport costsdoes NOT reduce maritime transport costs

Page 38: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Port privatizationPort privatization in the EXPORTING country in the EXPORTING country reduces maritime transport costsreduces maritime transport costs

Port reformPort reform

Page 39: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Trade facilitationTrade facilitation in the IMPORTING country in the IMPORTING country reduces maritime transport costsreduces maritime transport costs

Port reformPort reform

Page 40: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Dependent variable: maritime transport costs per tonne of containerizable cargo

Better Better connectivityconnectivity between ports/ between ports/ more competition among carriersmore competition among carriersreduces maritime transport costsreduces maritime transport costs

Port reformPort reform

Page 41: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

To sum up: To sum up: Differences in maritime freights depend on…Differences in maritime freights depend on…• Distances• Type & value of

goods• Imbalances

• Competition• Economies of

scale• Port

characteristics

Page 42: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

TransportTransportcostscosts

TradeTradeVolumesVolumes

TransportTransportServicesServices

?

Page 43: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Transport Costs ConnectivityTrade

Geneva, May [email protected]

Page 44: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

• TradeTrade grows faster than GDP

• Containerized tradeContainerized trade grows even faster than trade in general

• Containerized port trafficContainerized port traffic grows even faster than containerized trade…

Page 45: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Containerized port throughput Containerized port throughput

UNCTAD RMT, based on data from Drewry

Page 46: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Containerization of trade, and access Containerization of trade, and access to containerized transport services to containerized transport services

are important determinants of are important determinants of countries’ trade competitivenesscountries’ trade competitiveness

How can we measure this?

Page 47: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

““Connectivity”Connectivity”1) Per country – in a “point”2) Per route – between pairs of countries

Page 48: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

““Connectivity”Connectivity”1) Per country – in a “point” (162)

2) Per route – between pairs of countries

Page 49: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

““Connectivity”Connectivity”1) Per country – in a “point” (162)

2) Per route – between countries (13041)

Page 50: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

““Maritime connectivity”Maritime connectivity”UNCTAD’s “Liner Shipping Connectivity Index” (LSCI):

An indicator for the supply of liner shipping servicesComponents:• Ships • TEU capacity• Shipping companies• Services• Maximum ship sizes

Page 51: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

The UNCTAD LSCI componentsThe UNCTAD LSCI componentsIndex of country averagesIndex of country averages Maximum vessel size

TEU

VesselsServices

Companies

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Source: UNCTAD , based on data from Containerization International

Page 52: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

We have reached a peak We have reached a peak Until very recently:• In spite of the (global) process

of concentration, the number of companies providing (local) services increased due to the expansion of global players into (so far) new markets

Page 53: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

We have reached a peak We have reached a peak Today:• As global players are (now)

covering all regions of the world, mergers among them (start to) lead to a reduction of competition on individual routes.

Page 54: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Connectivity per countryConnectivity per country

based on www.ci-online.co.uk

Page 55: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Container ship deployment 2009Container ship deployment 20091446

Source: UNCTAD , based on data from Containerization International

Page 56: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Number of companiesNumber of companies96

Source: UNCTAD , based on data from Containerization International

Page 57: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

The UNCTAD “LSCI”The UNCTAD “LSCI”

Page 58: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

BarbadosBarbados

www.ci-online.co.uk

Page 59: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Connectivity per routeConnectivity per route

Top 25 routes (out of 13041)

Page 60: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010
Page 61: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Direct connectivity?Direct connectivity?Out of 162 x 161 pairs of countries: How many are connected by direct

services?

Source: UNCTAD , based on data from Containerization International

Page 62: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

How to deal with How to deal with indirect connections?indirect connections?For all pairs of countries• Direct services yes/no?• How many transshipments do I need?• Shortest distance with transshipments?• Largest vessels with transshipments? • Highest competition with transshipments

Page 63: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

TransportTransportcostscosts

TradeTradeVolumesVolumes

TransportTransportServicesServices

?

Page 64: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Determinants of maritime connectivityDeterminants of maritime connectivity

• Trade volumes (+)

• Distance (-)

• GDP per capita in exporting country (+)

• Port infrastructure (+)

Page 65: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Transport Costs Connectivity Trade

Geneva, May [email protected]

Page 66: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

TransportTransportcostscosts

TradeTrade

TransportTransportServicesServices

?

Page 67: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Gravity modelGravity model

• Participation of country B in global imports is the basic determinant of the share of country A’s exports that are destined for country B.

• Neighbouring countries can be expected to trade more with each other than those that are not neighbours.

Page 68: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Gravity model – what about distance?Gravity model – what about distance?

• Distance / trade: negative correlation (as expected)• But: the parameter for distance is not statistically

significant if other variables are incorporated that capture the supply of shipping services and transport costs.

• Instead of distance: – number of liner shipping companies that provide direct

services between a pair of countries.– Existence of direct liner shipping services.– Increase of the freight rate per TEU (twenty foot

equivalent unit) by 1000 USD: Reduction of the share of country A’s exports to country B of almost half a percentage point.

Page 69: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010
Page 70: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

In Conclusion…In Conclusion…

Page 71: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

In Conclusion…In Conclusion…

Page 72: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

In Conclusion…In Conclusion…

Page 73: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

In Conclusion…In Conclusion…

Page 74: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

In Conclusion…In Conclusion…

What I wanted to do in this first lecture:

• Present research on transport costs• Sell our “Connectivity Index”• Invite cooperation in future research

Page 75: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

What’s next? What’s next?

• Improve measurement of “connectivity”– Developments over time.

2010 will be 7th year with data.– Incorporate distance, transshipments,

frequencies, direct/indirect connections…– In-land connections, land-locked countries ?

• Identify determinants of “connectivity”• Use “connectivity” as determinant for

trade, transport costs et al .

Page 76: Jan.Hoffmann@UNCTAD   Geneva, May 2010

Transport Costs Connectivity Trade

Geneva, May [email protected]