jlo:-, tc~~la..) t:c.) - vliz · a 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for...

30
j- ,. Not to be cited without prior refererice to the author. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. ----- Statutory meeting, 1995 lCES, C.M. 1995/Q:2S Theme session "Intermediate-Scale Physical Processes and Their Influence on the Transport and Food Environment of Fish" Variability of the drift patterns of Spring Spawned herring larvae and the transport of water along the Norwegian shelf by Einar Svendsen, Petter Fossum, Morten D. Skogen, Gro Eriksmd, Herman Bj0rke, Kjell Nedraas Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway. Ame Johannessen Department of Fishery and Marine Biology, University of Bergen ( c,( C (L<f- rc < JlO:-, t:C.) Summary / A 3-diril.ensional baroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the toast and of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been run for 18 years. This model has been used to study the Norwegian spring spawned herring'larval transport from the main spawning areas at the coast of Norwal'. Currents fram thiS model are fed into a Lagrangian particle tracking model to sunulate the varying transports of larvae/juveniles. The simulations can explain muCh of the observed year to year variations in the distribution of herring larvae and juveniles, and significant larvae/juvenile transport into the Barents Sea seems to be a nessesary condition for good recruitment. In addition the model siinulate a significant . 1r mg-shelf larval mixing also observed in larval age investigations. Good r lts are also obtained with respect to volume tranSport estimates, and it is poSh that a major recirculation of about 15-20 Sverdrop takes place in the Norwegian Sea.

Upload: dinhque

Post on 03-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

j - ,.

Not to be cited without prior refererice to the author.

International Council for theExploration of the Sea. -----Statutory meeting, 1995

lCES, C.M. 1995/Q:2STheme session "Intermediate-ScalePhysical Processes and TheirInfluence on the Transport andFood Environment of Fish"

Variability of the drift patterns of SpringSpawned herring larvae and the transport of

water along the Norwegian shelf

by

Einar Svendsen, Petter Fossum, Morten D. Skogen, Gro Eriksmd,Herman Bj0rke, Kjell Nedraas

Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.Ame Johannessen

Department of Fishery and Marine Biology, University of Bergen

( c,( C(L<f-rc< JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.)Summary /

A 3-diril.ensional baroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the NorthSea, the Norwegi~ toast and p~ of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has beenrun for 18 years. This model has been used to study the Norwegian springspawned herring'larval transport from the main spawning areas at the coast ofNorwal'. Currents fram thiS model are fed into a Lagrangian particle trackingmodel to sunulate the varying transports of larvae/juveniles. The simulationscan explain muCh of the observed year to year variations in the distribution ofherring larvae and juveniles, and significant larvae/juvenile transport into theBarents Sea seems to be a nessesary condition for good recruitment. In additionthe model siinulate a significant .1rmg-shelf larval mixing also observed inlarval age investigations. Good r lts are also obtained with respect to volumetranSport estimates, and it is poSh ~d that a major recirculation of about 15-20Sverdrop takes place in the Norwegian Sea.

iud
ICES-paper-Thünenstempel
Page 2: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

&.

1. IntroductionThe obvious limitations in space and time (and large costs) of traditional

oceanographie ship sampling, and the rapid advances in computing capacity,have led to increasing efforts in 3-dimensional oceari circu1ation modelling.There is also an increasing demand for model results simulating the effects ofthe physical processes on the environment for fish and the chemical andbiological consequences of possible changes in anthropogenie inputs of nutrients,nuclear waists ete. to specific ocean areas (North Sea Task Force, 1993). In thispaper we try to evaluate the modeling capability of realistie simulation of larvaldistribution, describe some of th~ year to year variability of the distributions andwater transports, and specitlate on what possible effects th.iS might have onrecruitment. The biological background information comes from mapping ofspring spawned herring larvae and juveriiles (Clupea harengus 1.) along theNorwegian coast on separate cruises in April, May, July and August in mostyears since 1985. In addition to this, hatching investigations of herring larvaehave been carried out over the spawning beds (Fossum, 1995).

In Norway a coupled Physical-Chex;nical-Biological (P-C-B) modellingactivity of different parts of the Nordic Seas started in 1990-91 through closecooperation between the Institute of Marine Research (IMR) in Bergen, theInstitute of Fishery- and Marine Biology (!FM) and the Mathematical Institute(MI) at the University of Bergen,and The Norwegian Meteorological Institute(DNMI) in Oslo. Related to the above problem areas and that the hydrodynamicsof the oeean areas is quite compleX, it was found that to obtain any realism in thebiological results, the model system must be based on a sophisticated 3­dimensional physical model (Skogen et al., 1994, Aksnes et al., 1994, Skogen et al.,1995, Svendsen et al., 1995). Therefore the physical module is based on a modelby Blumberg and MeIlor (1987). This model performed favorably in arecentNorwegian model evaluation project, MOMOP (Martinsen et al., 1990, Swrdal etal., 1991); focusing on model iritercomparison arotind relatively "clean"problems with partly known analytical solutions. The first real application of thismodel related to fish is presented by Berntsen et al., (1994) on the trarisport ofsandeei in the North Sea. The total model system is now referred to as theNORWegian ECOlogical1-1odel system (NORWECOM) (Skogen, 1993).

Still the main weakness of most 3-D mode11.iIlg activities claiming tosimulate nature is the lack of comparison with adequate real data. We havetherefore compared the model results with some of the extensive herring larvaedata set, focusing the attention arourid the simulation of the distribution in Mayand July.

2) The model design2.1 The basic oceanographic model.

The three dimensional circubtion model due to Blumberg and Mellor(1987) is used to approximate the circulation of the North Sea, the Norwegianeoast and parts of the Norwegüin and Barents Seas (Fig. 1). The prognosticvariables of this model are the three components of the velocity field,

2

Page 3: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

'temperatui'e, salinity, stirlace elevation arid two quantities which characterizethe turbUlence, the tUrbulent kirietic energy arid the turbulent macroscale. Thegovemmg equatioris are the momenturn equations, the coritinuitY equation,conservation equatioris for temperature and salinitY and a. turbulence closuremodel for the turbUlent kinetic energy arid macroscale (Mellor and Yamada,1982). The eqmitions are approximated by finite difference techiUques. In thevertical a sigma-coordinate representation iS used. In this representation the seasurlace is mapped to 0 and the sea bottom to -l.

The model is implemented with a 20x20 km2 norizontal resolution. Thefeatures common to the two model setups are summarized below. Verticaliy 11sigma-coordmate layerS are used. The layers are chosen to give high resohitionnear the siUface. At 100 m depth the layers are 0.5 m, 0.7 m, 1.3 m, 2.5 m, 5 m, 10m, 20 m, 20 m, 20 m, 15 m and 5 m thick and 10 wnes these vahies at 1000 rii·bottom depth.

The model is ruri with hiridcast aanosphenc forcing (mcrmenhiiri fluxarid sUrface preSsure every 6 hour) provided by the Norwegian MeteorologicalInstitute, DNMI (Eide et al.,.1985, Reistadarid Iden, 1995). At all open bOUndariesof the model dOlmiin botindary conditionS.must be specified. At theseboundaries, except at the iriflow from the Baltic, a Flow Relaxation Scheme(FRS), (MartiriSen et aI., 1987) is unplemented. In laCk ofiriformation on thesulface heat fliIxes, we apply a methodof,"relaXation towards cllIDatology" dueto Cox andBryan (1984). The surface "heat flux", Tu (actUally sunplified to atemperamre fluX) is specifie~ by

(1)

where T is temperatureand K is tlle vertiCal diffusivity in the top layer. Thevertical diffusiviij iS computed in the model from the turbUlent kinetic energyand the turbulent macroscale. r iS the clinlatological value of the sea surface

•'''. tempeI-attire. r ~ a mne constarlt. r iS selr~cted tri be 1.736*io-s m/s which means

that temperatllie in the upper 15 m of the surface hiyer adjtiSt to theii respectivecliIriatological values on a time scale of 10 days in calrri weather. This mean.s thatthe sea surface tem.perature is not a fully prognostic variable. Fai more realsiIDulations the same approach could be applied .with input of "real" sunace .temperatilre distributions instead of climatological fields. However, suchdiginzed fields are at present not avallable for the authorS. A similar, but, \veaker .drag towardS climatological sea surface salinity is tised due to lack of realisticfreshwater mput in the northem region.

TO advance the numerical approximations öf the prognostlc vanables iritim.e, a mode splitting technique is applied. In the external mode computationsof the watei leveland verncally integrated velocities.are updated. Due to stabilitYconstraints the time-step of the extemal. mode (2-dimensional) computations

.must be muCh smaller than the time-step of the mterrial mode computations. Inthe mternal mode all 3-diinensional prognostic variables are updated.

3

Page 4: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

~. -- :" .. ' ,.·WCM Y' .. L. fiti r

Any such nonlinear model will (as in the real world) produce motion onsmaller and smaller horizontal scales as time goes by. Then, to avoid aliasing,energy on scales not resolved by the model must be removed. This is donethrough horizontal viscosity arid diffuSivity teI111S in the basic equations after aformulation due to Smagorinsky (1963). A choice of trio large diffusivityparameter removes much of the strocttire that are observed inthe oceanographicfields, and a too small value leads to 12.1x" noise and sometimes inStabilities.

The vertical eddy viscosity and diffuSivity are computed from themodelled turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent maeroscale and added to someconstant minimum values. In stratified water with relatively weak tidal and/orwind mixirig, these rriinimum values are reached, and therefore the results"depend on the choke of these constants.

2.2 The circulation model setup..The model is used to approximate the prognostic variables irom February

15 to September 15 each year in the 18 year period 1976-1993. Horizontally 125*81(20"'20 kIri2) grid cells are used. Clliriatologicil1 fields for horizontal velocity~

temperamre, salinity and water elevation for February are used as initial fields(Martinsen et al., 1992). Corresprinding fields for later months for these variablesare also used on the open boundaries. The thIee most important constituentS ofthe tide is also forced through the bOUndary zone by varying the water level andthe velocities. Both climatology and tidal fields are provided by DNMI.

The inflow irom the Baltic (placed at Storebelt) is implemented after analgorithm due to Stigebrandt (1980). TItis flow is determined from the differencein modeiled water level between the southem Kattegat and the Baltic, takinginto account climatological ireshwater input to the Baltie. The water enteringKattegat irom the Baltie is giVer1 a salinity of approximately 8.0 (s1ightly varymgwith season).

In the North Sea monthly mean river runoff irom the Rhine, Meuse,Scheldt, Ems, Weser, EIbe, Thames, Huinber, Tyne and Tees is used. Daily riverrunoff from the 6 largest Swedish rivers betweeri 0resund and the Norwegianborder, and the fresh water runoff irom the coast of Norway, inc1uding Glonima,is based on monthly clirriatological mean fluxes and distributed on 19 outletsalong the Norwegian coaSt. All the"freshwater inputs are gathered and providedby several different institutions arouri.d the North Sea. At each external time-stepthe water level of the coastal ceil closest to the river outlet is increased accordingto the volume of fresh water discharged durmg the extemal step. The fresh wateris mixed with the saline water down to 15 meter. The external time-step is 30seconds and the internal time-step iS 15 mmutes.

2.3 The particle tracking moduleDaily mean currents from the circuIation module are fed into a

Lagrangian partic1e tracking module to sUnulate the trarisport of the

4

Page 5: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

larvae/juvenlles. The short term (hours)variabilitj of the eu.rrentS are uSed toproduce along and acioss track particle diffusion terms. The pärticles assumed torepresent herring !arvae are released in the spawning areas according to meanhatching curves. At the main spaWning grounds (SurinIncre/ Buagniimen, Fig.3a) the peak hatching is around March 30, starting around March 5 and endingaratmd Apri12S. The particles are given a vertical migration pattern as cifuriction of light and turbulent IDixirig accordirig to Heath et al. (1988).

At present rio mortality is intioduced in the model. The same cimount ofparticles are mtrodticed each year, so basically we compare the diStribution ariddrift patterns of observed larvae vs. modeled particles, arid not the actualnumbers of larvae.

"•At earlier tiIries, major spawning also took place at 5 other weil knoWri

spaWnfug grounds along the Norwegian coast. Even though very weak or riospaWning at, an took place in these areas dUring these 18 years of model runs,separate particles are also released here to sttidy possib1E! interestirig drift patternsfrom these spaWning grounds.

.' ... , _. f

3. ResultS3.1 Model validation and larval distributions., '

,. Ni an.example, a monthly mean. modeled velocity distribution is showriin Fig. 1. This shows,weIl known featUres of thedIcUlation, but it is difficU1t tovalidate~ During1993 a satellite positioned dri.ftißg Argos buoy With a drough at20 mdepthwere released in one of theearlieriinportant spawning grounds(Kai1:Iwy) dtÜing peak hatc:hirig. Around the buoy release site, several partlcleswere reIeased in the model. The individual tracks of the modeled particles wentin many different directions and with quite varying speeds. This would also bethecase if many buöys were released in the same area. A compariSori of the driftof thiS single buoy to one of tbe ''best fit'~ partide trackS are shown in Fig. 2.Although this demonstcites a very good simulation, it does not prove theprecision of the model, but it indicates that the model probably copy some of therriain hydicidynaritic processes.

In Fig. 3, severalobserved herririg larvae distributions aie comparedwithsimilar modeled distributions. For comparlSon the differences between modelisolines is Jfö, sinillär to the observations. TIle years arid mnes selected here arebasedon a11 the best ship coverages of the totallarvae distributions, and notperiods with best fit with model reSults. One sho,~ld keep in mirid that theobservations are taken over 1-2 weeks periods while the model results are"smipshots" iri the iriiddle of each observational perlod. Here only modeledparticles Eiom the StinnzIwre/ Buagnmnerispawning grounds (see Fig. 3a) arepresented. In July1981 the northemmost larval front towarclS Bear ~land is weIlsimulated. The westeIrimcist patch of high coricentration is,aISo picked up by themodel. However, no larvae were observed being left around the spawninggrounds (maybe due to heavy predation) such as siInulated by the model. There

5

Page 6: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

7 Im E h'inERi'r.nrsrmn.:tMw.

is also a tendency of the larvae having progressed slightly further into theBarents Sea than postuhited by the model..

• • I

: i'

In May 1987 (Fig. 3b) the northern' transport along the coast and thewestward extension is weil siniulated. West of Haltenbanken (see Fig. 3a) andaround the spawnirig areas the model shows some partlcles where no larvaewere found (agam maybe due to heavy predation). Outside western NOrWay tothe south, some larvae were found, not bemg simulated by the model, howeverthe large size of these larvae show that they belong to autumn spawned(previous year) herring from the North Sea (Bje,rke and Sc:etre, 1994, Nedraas andSmestad,1987). " .

Two months later, in July 1987 (Fig. 3c), the northem boundary of larvaehad moved about 400 kni northeast to the entrance of the Barents Sea. TItis isrealistically simulated together with tWo distirict large patches of larvae, one.south and one north of Lofoten(see Fig. 3a). The total westWard extenSionof thelarvae were not properly monitared thiS Year. The little black squares in ail themodel distribution maps indiCate the.center of gravit}r of the pamcles. In 1987this was extremely far west due to long penods of persiStent north andnortheasterly winds.

In May 1989 (Fig. 3d), the wavellke herring front towards west was weilsimulated, and so was the northward extension. The area with the northemmostmodeled patch were not mapped by the ship.

A quite similar distributio~ occurr~d inMay 1991 (Fig. 3e), also quiterealistically simulated with. respect to 'north and westward extension. This year, ,quite a few larvae were left at the spa~g site.

Two months later, in July 1991 (Fig. 3D, a large spread has ocetÜ'red. Cleadythe shape of the distribution up towards Spitsbergen and slightly into the BarentsSea is realistically simulated. The inodeled residence of larvae around" thespawning grounds is not conflrmed due to lack of observations, but the very .,high number of larvae near the Haltenbariken indicates that more larvae alsowere present further to the south.

3.2 Volume transports , 'The volume transportS north along the Norwegian coast is strongly

coupled to the supply of Atlantic Water from the south. However, it is verydifficult to estimate realistic integrated volume transports over deep water fromsporadic measuremerits of a.irrents and/or hydrography, and we believe thatvalidated numerical models are proffiising tools for estimating the oceantransports.

L'1. 1990 and 1991 the Institute of Marine Research, Bergen surveyed thehydrographie Svinßy sectlon (northwest from the Suniun"re spawning ~ound,Fig. 3a) once a month. Based on these data, Blindheim. (1993) calculated the

·6

Page 7: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

gecistrophic voltime transports throitgh the semon, ilsing 1000 m depth as a zerovelocit)r reference layer (partly due to lack of deeper data). Along the samesectien, (somewhat extended into the ,N<;>rWegian Sea) an example of modeled'velocity arid salinity distributions are presented i:ri Fig. 4, averaged for April 1990.The transport ofthe Atlaritic water northward along the Norwegiancontinentalslope is nicely shciWn, together,with the westWard spread of tne Atlailtic aridNorwegian,coastal water and the subsürtace low saliriitj mtennediatewater. At1000 m depth the model iridicates velocities arotind 2-4 ems-! where B1i:il.dheiInused 0 velocity. From simple calculations the model resultS therefore shouldgive transports in the tipper 1000 m of about 10 SVerdiup (1 SV=106n13s-l ) higherthan Blin~heiIri. ,It is worth noting in Fig., 4 that together with the deepcirculation around 2 cms-l , the total transport (based on monthly meari.velocities) adds up to about 30 Sverdrup.

•~ A comparison between Blindheun and monthly meari. model results of

the upper 1000 ci are shoWn in Fig. 5. Themodel results is as expected about 11­12 Sverdrop higherthan the Blindheim estima.tes, and the obvious seasonalcyde seems well simuläted.

. The monthly mean. modeled volume transports through the total sectionand in the upper 1000 for all the 18 years arid the rricinths March to AugUst are,presented in Fig. 6a..This clearly demonstrates part of the seäsonal cycle occiuringiri all Years. Espedally in 1989 and 1990 ,the traIlSpoI'tSwere quite high dunngMarch, April, arid other model results (DanieLSsen et al., 1995) cleatly shows thatmaximum,transportS also occurred into the Nerth Sea durmg these wiriters.That very large transports into the North SEia took place in 1990 is co:riiiimed bymeasurements of' the highest salinities eyer observed in the northem North Sea(Heath et al., 1991; Ellett and Turrell, 1992).

For comparlson similar monthly mean volwrie transports northeastwardthrough the GiIris"r(Lofoten) and the Fugl.0ya (NorWay)-Bj0rrwYa (Bear !sland)sections (see Fig. 1) eire shown in Fig. 6b. The transpert through the GiIDs"rsection iS down to about half of the transport through the SviMy s~tiori ftirthersouth. ,The Seasonal variation is less pronoitnced, but stroriger year t6 yeeirvariabilitY seems to OCM.

Into the Barents Sea through the Bjmnaya-FugWya section the modeiedflows in ,tl1e Stimmer montllS are about 3 sv and somewhat higher in the earlyspring (Fig. 6b). Iri September-october 19~8, mne cUrrent-meterrigs across,the 'section were in operation. From these data Blindheim (1989) estimated thetranSport to be 3.1 SViIlto and 1.2 SV. out tfuough the seetiori. Otir nearestmodeled montl1 to thiS is AuguSt 1978 which gave 3.0 SV iIlt6 ärid 0.7 SV outthrough tl1e same section.

DlscUssion , " ,,. Total volume transports into the Nci~dic Seas. thrC?u,.gh. the Faeroe- ,

Shetlarid channel has been ni6delled arid esmnated by several typically to vary

7

Page 8: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

between 5 and 10 SV. There .are also good reasons to believe that a significanttransport of several Svercfrup also flows in .west of the Faeroe Islands. Even ifthis adds up to say 10·15 SV, theie eire still 15·20 SV leit to fill the modeledtransports of about 30 SV through the SviIwy seetion (Fig. 6). If we choose tobelieve in the model, this means that a vei}' large arid deep recirculation takesplace of about 15·20 SV in the Norwegian Sea, which to our knowiedge neverearlier has beeil quantified.

This is partly confumed by the trar1.sport.s through the Gims"Y sectionfurther north with transports around 15 SV~ However some northward transportprobably takes place west of.thissection, and to fully c6rifi.rm these results themodel should beextended.allthe way to Greeruand. The agreement withBlindheim's tranSport estirriates EiOIn hydrographical data along the SviruJyseetion and from current meter measurements along the Fug10ya-Bjmn.oyaseetion is exciting, but further detailed iritercomparisons is needed before wefully can trust the model results.

One of the goals with this modclmg activity was to study what possibleeffects the drift of herring Iarvae might haye on recruitment. S6 far thisis only abeginning of the study. For many of these years the recruitment was dose to zerodue to a very small spawiürig stock, but the 1983 stands out as a pecU1iar"yeardass. The survival index (number of one year old in January relative to thespawning stock biomass) "jtimped from zero in the previous years to a very largenumber above 80 [no.pr.kg] and back to zero. The large 1983 yeardass started .slowly to reproduce in 1988·89 (survival iridex 2 and 4 respectively) with strorigersurvival in 1990 and 91(sUMval indexes of 13 and 21 respectively) and verystrong survival in 1992 (surVivai indeX 68). 1993 became a very pecuIiar yearwhere the survival rate dropped to zero even if very large amounts of larvaewere found during summer.

There has been speculations on that for some unknown reason goodrecruitment depends on significant larväl drift into the Barents Sea. Fig. 7demonstrates the modeled larval distribution on August 20 for the years 1991arid 1992 (where particles haS been releaSed also from the spawning groundsKarnwy and Haltenbanken although very ~ttle spawrung took place in theseareas). The figure shows clearly that many more larvae had entered the BarentsSea in 1992 than in 1991, and the center of gravity of all the larvae were about 70nautica1 miles further northeast in 1992. It iS iriteresting to note that if significantspawnirig had taken place in 1991 on the KaI'IIl.."Y spaWning ground, parts of thelarvae would have drifted southward with the inflow of Atlantic water and intotlle Skagerrak all the way to the Swedish coast. This may have been a veryimportant recruitment process in earlier days when Karm0}' was one of the bestspawning grolinds.

Similar to Fig. 7, the modeled larval distribution in August 1983 (with thestrongest survival index) is compared in Fig. 8 with the distribution in 1993 (withzero survival but many young larvae). Very many larvae seems to have drifted

8

"'.'•

..

e

Page 9: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

irito the Barents 5ea in 1983, while most of: the larVae in 1993 were transpoIiedtowards Spitsbergen. For the same tWo years, the cumulative numbers of thelarvae eritering and staying withiri. the Barents sea east of the Bj0IIl0Ya (BearIsland)-Fug1ßya(Norway) section are presented in Fig. 9. A few larvae seems toha.ve eritered the Barents sea also in 1993, but it is worth notirig that thetransport northward has been much faster in 1983 when significant amountS ciflarvae started to enter the Barents sea about 40 days earlier tl1an in 1993.

1'0 compare all years of pcirtlcle inflow to the BäreritS sea, the number ofpartic1es east of the Bjanwya-Fug1ßya section on AuguSt 20and September12 arepresented mFig. 10. In this respect the theoreticallarvae from the Haltenbcinkencan be neglected. Clearly 1983 starids out aS the year with the strongest inflow totbe Barents Sea. Also in 1992 (with strang survival) the iIiflow were large.Hciwevei, quite large arid early inflows also occitrred in 1976, 1979 and 1986, so

•' why did these not produce good survival years? First of al1 probably due to the

. very small spawning stock iri these years giving too few larvae to measure.Secondly the upper ocean environment m. these years was cold on theNorwegian shelf where tl1e larvae were drifting northward, probably reducmgthe chances for survival. Also in 1983 the spawning stoCk was small, but thetemperature was high. From earlier work by,Krysov et al. (1995) it iS coricludedthat good reciuitment statistically depends on a high nwriber of larvae (related totbe spawning stock siZe), high near-st.Üface,temperature cind reduced northerlywinds. In 1993 there were a very high number of larvae and relatively hightemperature, but northerly winds hindered the larvae to be transported into theBarentS Sea.

,

'. ' Since the spawriing tYPicälly takes place over a penod of 50 days, oneshould,gerierally aSsume that the first spaWned larvae are those beingtransported furthest to the riorth. However, sttidies of otolith micio-strUctureshow no significant age difference betWeen the larvae found iri theHaltenbanken region (64-66 oN), söuth of the Lofoten (66-68 ON) arid riorth of (68

•" oN) Lofoten (see Fig. 3a) (Fossum and Moksness, 1993 and 1995). ThiS is also

tested out in the model, and on average at about May 20 the larvae are about 9daysolder inthe neighbour area to the north. At about July 5 thiS difference haSdecrea5ed to about 3 days which is not signmcant in relation to measurements.ObvioUsly,thiS IDixing of ages must be caused by mesoscale circuhition featuresmakiIi.g larvae in seme areas/at tiines being stationary cir even flew seuthward,while yoimger larvae are passing bye. ThiS proceSs takes place on many differentscciles, and the lack of fine-scale horizontal resolution in the model must be thecause for this prcicess seemmg to be slightly stronger in nature tban smmlated bythe model.

Finally, it may be argued tbat the larvae after m~tamorphosis (at an age ofabout 100 days)may be capable of sigmficant horiZontal migration, and thereforecan not be treated as lateral paSsive particles as we da in the model. To our ,knowledge nobody has proven such migration in offshore waters. However, if ithappens, there are good rE:iason to believe that süeh migration is steered by food

9

Page 10: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

._~~~.'-~"SI!!!fl'p!!.!!!'~--.'~••; -~..., ......._--.-III!~---_..._--_....-_........78!Jt!!II1I!!\!!!I!!!!![$di.-..!!:l

availability. Food (zooplankton) concentration is to a large extent steered by thecirculation and frontal struetures, and we therefore believe that a potentialmigration roughly would follow the general circulation.

Conclusions .Based on 18 years (1976-1993) model simulations of 3-diIriensional oeean

circulation and partiele (herring larvae) drift in the North Sea, along theNorwegian eoast and in parts of the Norwegian and Barents Seas, together Withseveral years of measured hemng larval distribution, the following conelusionscan be drawn:

1) On a large seale the model seems quite realistieally to simulate several years ofmeasured distributions of Norwegüin spring spawning herring larvae about 2and 4 months after hatching at the St.iiuUrwre/Buagrunneri spawning areas.

2) Modeled v6lume transports eompared With transport estimates from •hydrographie data and c:uri'ent meter measurements demoristrates the ability tosimwate seasonal changes in the Norwegiari Sea and realistic inflow to theBarentS Sea.

3) The model results indicate that recirci.tlated volume transports of about 15-20Sverdrop takes place in the NOrWegian Sea

4) It seems that signifieant larval transportS into the Barents Sea may be necessaryfor good recruitment, and together with warm upper ocean temperature duringspring, these may be the most important facters for producing good yeardisseswhen the spaWning stock is above a certaID minimum. This fits weil with theextremely different years of 1983 with good recruitment iri spite of a smailspawning stock, and 1993 with bad recruitment in spite of a large spawning stockand a very large number of young larvae. .

5) The model demoristratesthat larvae from the KarIIWY spawning ground can •drift irito the Skagerrak, which may have been an important process forrecruitment in the old days when Karmey was (one of) the main spawninggrourid.

Ackriowledgement, We like to thank ail the people at the Institute of Marine Research whohas been irivolved over many years in gathering the data used here. Thank youalso to the University of Bergen for making large computer resources availableand to the Norwegian Meteorological Institute for the input to the atmosphericforcing of the model.

10

Page 11: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

ReferencesAure, J., Darrlelssen, D.S., and Svendsen E.. (1995). The impact of Southem

North Sea Water on the nutrient eonditions in the Skagerrak in latespring 1988-1994. Iri prep.

Bemtsen J., D.W. Skagen and E. Svendsen. (1994). Modeling the transport ofparticles in the North Sea with referenee to Sandeel laroae. Fish.Oceanogr. 3: 2, 81-89,1994.

Blindheim J. (1993). Seasonal variations in the Atlantie inflow to the NordicSeas. International Counsil for the Exploration of the Sea. C.M. 1993/C: 39,13pp.

-

Blindheim J. (1989). Cascading of Barents Sea bottom water into the NorwegianSea. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 188: 49-58.

Bj"rke, H. and Scietre, R. (1994). Transport of ftsh laroae and juvenile jish intoeentral and northem NOrWegian waters. Fish. Oceanogr., 3(2), 106-119.

Danielssen, D.S., Davidsson, L., Edler, L., Fogelquist, E., Fonselius,. S.H., F"J'Il, L.,Hemroth, L., Häkansson, B., Olsson, I. and Svendsen, E., (1991). SKAGEX:Some Preliminary Results. International Counsil for the EXploration ofthe Sea. G\11991/ C:2, 14 pp. .

Danielssen, D.S., Edler, L, Fonselius S, Herriroth, L., Ostrowski, M. and Svendsen,E., (1995). Oceanographie variability in Skagerrak/ northern Kattegat, May­June 1990. Submitted to lCES J. Mar. Sei.

Danielssen, D.S., Svendsen, E. and Ostrowski, M. (1995). Long tirm hydrographievariation in the Skagerrak based on the seetionTorungen-Hirtshals.Submitted to the lCES Jour. Mar. Sci.

Dybem, B.L, Danielssen, D.S., Hemroth, L. and Svendsen, E.(1994). TheSkageTTak Eiperiment-Skagex Report 1988-1994. Nordic Counsil of.Ministers, Copenhagen. ISBN 92-9120-565-6, ISSN 0908-6692

Eide, L.L, Reistad, M. and Guddal, J., (1985). Database JOT estimated wind andwaue parameters for the North Sea, the Norwegiizn Sea and the BarentsSea. (in Norwegian). DNMI report.

Ellett, D. J. and W. R. Turrell (1992) Increased salinity levels in the NE Atlantic.ICES C.M.1992/C:20.

Fossum,P. and Moksness, E. (1993). A study of spring- and autumn-spawnedherring (Clupea harengus 1.) larvae in the Norwegian Coastal Currentduring spring 1990. Fisheries Oceanography, 2:2, 73,;,81.

11

Page 12: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

........- ~ .............~ &-.... " ~~ - - .~ ....~..,.. ,_,," __ 4 ~-. t

Fossum,P. and Moksness, E. (1995). Recruitment processes of the 1991 year-c1assof Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus L.) determinedfrom otolith microstTucture examination. In:: Secar, D.H., I.M.Dean and S.E. Campana (eds.) "Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research": 467­479.

Fossum, P. (1995 in press). A study of first feeding herring (Clupea harengus L.)larvae during the period 1985-1993. ICES J. mare Scl.,xx: xxx-xxx.

Heath M. R., E. W. Henderson, G. Slesser and E. M. S. Woodward (1991). Highsalinity in the North Sea. Nature, 352, 116.

Heath, M.R., Henderson, E.W. and Baird, D.L., (1988). Vertical distribution ofherring larvae in relation to physical mixing and illumination. Mar. Ecol.Prog. Ser., Vol. 47: 211-228. . .

Krysov, A., Bj0rke, H. and Svendsen, E. (1995). Factors determining the yearclass •strength of Norwegian spring spawning herring. In:

Martinsen, E. (1995). Hindcast of Ocean Currents. Summary Report. DNMIResearch Report NO.7. ISSN 0332-9879.

Nedraas, K. and Smestad, O. (1987). Abundanee and distribution of postlarvae inthe O-group saith survey in the Northeast Aretic Ü'l 1986 and 1987. Coun.Meet. int. Coun. Explor. Sea, G:87, 27 pp.

North Sea Task Force, (1993). North Sea Subregion 8 Asessment Report. StatePollution Control Authority, Os10, Norway. ISBN 82-;655-157-2.

Reistad, M. And Iden, K.A. (1995).Updating, eorrection and evaluation of ahindeast data base of air, pressure, winds and waues for the North Sea,Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea. DNW Research Report No.9.

Skogen M.D. (1993) A User's guide to NORWECOM, The Norwegian e. Ecological Model System. ISSN 0804-2128. Rep. M. 6, Center for Marine

Environment, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway

Skogen M., J. Berntsen, E. Svendsen, D. Aksnes and K. Ulvestad, (1995).Modeling the primary produetion in the North Sea using a coupled 3­dimensional physical ehemical biologieal oeean model. Accepted inEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, June 1994.

Skogen, M., Svendsen, E., Ostrowski, M. (1995). Quantifying Volume andNutrient, Transports and Primary Production with the NorwegianEcologieal Model system (NORWECOM). (submitted to Cont. ShelfRes.).

12

-

Page 13: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

Si' 5 P m -="'5 _ -.

Svendsen, Einu (1995). HavstrBmkart og Biologi i Skagerrak.Rapport fraHavforskningsinstituttet (in Norwegian)

Svendsen, E., Berotsen, J., Skogen, M., Adlandsvik, B., Martinsen, E. (1995).Model Simulation of the Skagerrak Circulation and Hydrography duringSkagex. (Accepted in J. Mar. Syst.)

13

Page 14: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

'--"",,,,'

-

.~:~.: ~.. -'- .. '. "~.'"~ ; •• -.... ~'",.p'~

-'~ '.. .. .~-' -._...

Figure legends

Figure 1. Model area and monthly mean cUrrent pattern at 20 m depth inJuly, 1993 (max. current 63 cms-1). Some names on spawning grounds areinserted.

Figure 2. Intercomparison of modeled traeer (dashed line and weekly dots)and drifting Argos buoy (with drough at 20 m depth) in the period April 23 toJuly 30, 1993.

Figure 3a. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm. trawling) and modeled (relativeconcentration) distribution of herring larvae in July, 1981.

Figure 3b. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm trawling) and modeled (relativeeoncentration) distribution of herring larvae in May, 1987.

Figure 3e. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm. trawling) and modeled (relative •coneentration) distribution of herring larvae in July, 1987.

Figure 3d. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm. trawling) and modeled (relativeconeentration) distribution of herring larvae in May, 1989.

Figure 3e. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm. trawling) and modeled (relativeconeentration) distribution of herring larvae in May, 1991.

Figure 3f. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm. trawling) and modeled (relativeconcentration) distribution of herring larvae in July, 1991.

Figure 4. Average (April 1990) modeled velocity [cms-1] and salinitydistributions accross the vertieal section northwest from SviIwy, Norvvay intothe deep Norwegian Sea.

Figure 5. Intereomparison between geostrophie volume transport estimates(Blindheim, 1993) from monthly (in 1990 and 1991) hydrographie data along theSvi.Iwy seetion (zero velocity referenee layer at ~OOO m) and monthly meanmodeled transports.

Figure 6a. 18 years (1976-1993) of modeled monthly mean volume transportsthrough the total Svirwy seetion and through the upper 1000 m.

Figure 6b. 18 years (1976-1993) of modeled monthly mean volume transportsthrough the Fugl.0ya (Norway)-Bj"nwya (Bear Island) (upper) and the Gims"Y(Lofoten) seetions.

14

..

Page 15: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

','.' '.

Figure 7. Mode1ed particle distribution on August 20 for the years 1991 and1992, where partides has been released also from the spawning grounds Karmeyand Haltenbanken in addition to Sl1IU\IIWre/Buagrunnen

Figure 8. Modeled particle distribution on August 20 for the years 1983 and1993, where particles has been released also from the spawning grounds Karmeyand Haltenbanken in addition to Sunnmßre/Buagrunnen.

Figure 9. Cumulative numbers of the modeled larvae in 1983 and 1993having entered and stayed within the Barents Sea east of the Bj0I'IWYa (BearIsland)-Fugl.0ya(Norway) seetion.

Figure 10. 18 years (1976-1993) of modeled number of particles fromSunnm.0re/Buagrunnen and Haltenbanken situated east of the Bj0I'IWYa­Fugl.0ya seetion on August 20 and September 12.

15

Page 16: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

"- ..-....-.~ .....~ ..~ ..."..... .... _. ..'r'o.. . '" - ~.- - ~ -~ "- .... -.........-..-, . ...~'":~";.

.. os

. -" ..-:-~.~~~_J:::=~!.•

tQ 1$ 100 las 110 I1S 120 12S

Figure 1.July,1993

Model area and monthly mean current pattern at 20 m depth in(max. current 63 cms-1).· '.... .

Figure 2. Intercomparison of modeled tracer (dashed Une and weekly dots)and drifting Argos buoy (with drough at 20 m depth) in the period April 23 toJuly 30, 1993.

Page 17: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

,

Spitsbergen ,

BarentsSea

I Hear Is1aIl.d

.,. ....

)-.•

NorthSea

FigUie 3a. Observed (tipper, no.pr.loS nm trawÜng) cind modeled (relativeconceritration) distribution of herririg larvae in July, 1981.

Page 18: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

·'-.• I

L

Figure 3b. Observed (upper, no.pr.1.5 nm trawling) and modeled (relativeconcentration) distribution of herr~'lg larvae in May, 1987.

Page 19: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

I-•••

Figure 3e. Observed (upper, no.pr.L5 nci trawling) arid modeled (relativeeoneentration) distribution of herring laivae m. July, 1987.

Page 20: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

a

Clq

.....•

,.'

"

\.

"

I

'.'

//

Figure 3d. Observed (upper, no.pr.l.S nm trawling) and modeled (relativeconcentration) distribution of herrlng larvae in May, 1989.

Page 21: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

.~.•

.•

Fig1ire 3e. Observed (upper, no.pi.loS nrn tra~1iIlg)arid mode1f~d (relativeconcentration) distribution of herring larVae in May, 1991.

Page 22: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

- . .,~

•Cl Cl ~ ~

CI Cl! CI Cl!

//\~"

I"\/ ..

,,'

IJ.~".'

\,/ -- /' 0

CI",

",...\ //

"

Figure 3f. Observed (upper, no.pr.loS nm trawling) and modeled (relativeconcentration) distribution of herring larvae in July, 1991.

Page 23: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

soo

1000

1500

.,2000

.,2SOO

3000

NORWSEA

J......····················rJ

i~-..l..--.J­..::......J

HOR.VEL.OCtTY MOOE1.ReSULTS. APR 1990TransDClrt· 21.S s"w_ ( 31.0 • -2.% I

NORWSEA

SALlNrTY MOOeLReSULni APR 1990

sd-.., 11.,.....,;.'. 1006 KJoTcnsJS ( 1082. .15 I

SVINOEY

Figuie4. Average (Aprll 1990) modeled velocitY [ans-t] and siliriitYdistributions accross the vemcal seetion northwest from Svinoy, Norway mtothe deep Nonvegian Sea.

Page 24: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

. ,~.

18

16

17

-11-1990 obs

--0--1991 obs

----1990 mod

--- -1991 mod

5

6

9

7

8

,\ ,

\\

\\

\ ~---\\ /,.--- t1 5

4 '0.... __ " 1_31 -- \ / 13

1\1

\ I

2 __+-_-4-_-+__+--_-+-_---l- -+o__-+-_~_ ____:.. 1 2

10

Co:=..."C...Cl)

>cn

J F M A M J J A s o N o

Figure 5. Intereomparison between geostrophie volume transport estimates(Blindheim, 1993) from monthly (in 1990 and 1991) hydrographie data along theSviI'wy section (zero velocity reference layer at 1000 m) and monthly meanmodeled transports. .

Page 25: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

~ " ~ ~ • ., • a M • • ~ • • • n _ a

.'

.....!

U • D • • • ~ a a

. Figure 6a. 18 years (1976-1993) of modeled monthly mean volume transportsthrough the total Svi.n0y section arid through the upper 1000 m.

BIo....,..-Fvat.,•..;..p.-:>-...,..-r-:-~-:--:::""\--:--';'::;::';~~~iT\I""i"i:--""T'--/T'"

~ " " ~ • u • a M U •

:z:

i

,..",..711011

Figure 6b. 18 years (1976-1993) of modeled monthly mean volume transportsthrough the Fugleya (Norway)-BjoI1WYa (Bear Island) (upper) and tne Gim.s0y(Lofoten) seetions.

Page 26: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

\

SunnmoerelBuagrunnenKarmoeyHaltenbanken

Sunnmoere/BuagrunnenKarmoeyHaltenbanken

:.~~ifi~~.i;J -::-...:.-

.:.

1991

• •••.

=V:"·"~ ~.,

: ; "J• .J> •

... ..:.

'.,....

.l.

1992

Figure 7. Modeled particle distribution on August 20 for the yeais 1991 and1992, where particles has been released also from the spawning grounds Karmoyand Haltenbanken in addition to Sunnmore/Buagrunnen

Page 27: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

.......

",

: /

iJ_.~-,

' .

1993

1983

i .

SunnmoerelBuagrunnenKarmoey,Haltenbanken

o SunnmoerelBuagrunnenx Karmoey.Y Haltenbanken

oxy

.:.:.~;~~~;~~)~;._~~~·.:':t;,.~;s:.

..~-~~=?; ..::':~::~~t

~~~~~

·~~1·

~~

.....­~: ..

Figure 8. .. Modeled particle distribution on August 20 for the years 1983 md1993, where partldes has been released also fiom. the spaWnmg grounds Karrriciyand Haltenbanken iri addition 1:0 Stirirnririre/Buagronnim. .

Page 28: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

•Bjsmsya • FugIsya, 1983

800

600

200

60 so 100 120 140 160 180200 Number of day

juI

Bjsmsya - Fuglsya, 1993

200

eo60O+---""T"""--..,..--""!l--....,.--""""!-==::::::::!:=:::;=--___,~-___,

100 120 140 111:0 180 200 Number cf day

Figure 9. Cumulative numbers of the modeled larvae in 1983 and 1993having entered and stayed within the Barents Sea east of the Bjemwya (BearIsland)-Fugl0ya(Norway) sectiori..

Page 29: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

(f) ]W...I0i=er

'600 I~u.0

]erwco:E;:)zw>

~1200

;:)

:E;:) 10000

Bj"maya - Fuglaya, August 2Ö

lilii Hattenbanlcen :.. Sunnrnl!reiBua~.nen!

.~

...,

Bj"maya - FuglaYa, September 12

!0 HaItanbanken :I.. SunnmliJrelBuagnr.nen ;

Figw-e 10. 18 years (1976-1993) of modeled number of particles fromSunnm"re/BuagruImen and Haltenbanken. situated east of the Bjorririya­FugleYa section on August 20 and September 12.

Page 30: JlO:-, tC~~lA..) t:C.) - VLIZ · A 3-diril.ensionalbaroclinic hydrod}rnamic model implemented for the North Sea, the Norwegi~toast and p~of the Norwegian and Barents Seas has been

-----------~-~.HAVFORSKNINGSINSTI'TUnlTINSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCHNordnesgaten 50 • P. O. Box 1870 NordnesN-5024 Bergen' NorwayTel: 47 55 23 8500· Fax: 4755238531

FORSKNINGSSTASJONEN FLSDMGENF1.0DEVIGEN RESEARCH STAnONN-4817 His - NorwayTel:4737010580-Fe .1737010515

AUSTEVOLL HAV8R;. . iTASJONAUSTEVOLL AQUACULL. .: STAnONN-5392 Storebe . NorwayTel: 4756180342· Fax: 4756180398

MATREHAV8RUKSSTASJONMATRE AQUACULTURE STATIONN-5198 Matredal . NorwayTel: 4756366040 - Fax: 47563661 43