joint - university of chicagowebcast-law.uchicago.edu/briefs/2004-1591jointappendix.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
]1111IIIIIIII1111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllIJl]IIIIIIIILIIIIIIUSFC2004-1591-01
{C9332C91 -B1 B0-49AF-960A-03260812B264}
{61675} {05-050707:13561 9} {060205}
JOINTAPPENDIX
04-1591
WEST/CRS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
THE PILLSBURY COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve
EILEDU.S. COURT "OFApp
THE FEOERAL CI_AcL_OR
JUN - 2 ZOO5
JM HORBALy
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in Court No.
00-12-00570, Judge Evan J. Wallach
CORRECTED
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
JOINT APPENDIX
Saul Davis
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Civil Division-Commercial
Litigation Branch
Counsel for Defendant-AppelleeUnited States
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
(212) 264 3584
John M. Peterson
Counsel of RecordCurtis W. Knauss
NEVILLE PETERSON LLP
Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant
The Pillsbury Company17 State Street, Suite 1900
New York, New York 10004
(212) 635-2730
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Slip Opinion .........
Docket ..............
Complaint ...........
Answer .............
Statutes .............
Hearing Transcript . ..
Answer to Amended Complaint
Hearing Transcript II ........
Hearing Exhibits ............
.. 13
.. 27
.. 39
..47
.. 51
105"
130
• 655*
* Pursuant to the Judicial Protective Order of January 15, 2003, certain portions of the appendix
have been labeled as Confidential. Pursuant to CAFC Rule 30(h)(1)(B), following is a description
of the general nature of the material that has been deleted from the non-confidential version. Pages
97-A through 104 contain information regarding the ingredient formulae of the subject merchandise
and the Confidential Amended Complaint. Pages 535 through 610 also contain ingredient formulae
of the subject merchandise as well as manufacturing processes. Pages 663 through 1250 contain
sensitive marketing materials in addition to manufacturing processes.
SLIP-OP 04-84
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
THE PILLSBURY CO.,
Plaintiff, :
V. "
UNITED STATES, :
Defendant. :
PUBLIC VERSION
Before: WALLACH, JudgeCourt No.: 00-12-00570
[Judgment for Defendant.]
Decided: July 12, 2004
Neville Peterson, LLP, (John M. Peterson, Curtis W. Knauss) for Plaintiffs.
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; Barbara S. Williams, Attorney in Charge,
International Trade Field Office, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial LitigationBranch; Saul Davis, Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch;
Michael Heydrich, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, International Trade Litigation, U.S.Customs and Border Protection, of counsel, for Defendant.
WALLACH, Judge:
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court for decision following a bench trial on November 13,
2003, and November 14, 2003. Plaintiff, the Pillsbury Company, challenges the United States
CustomsService's_("Customs")decisiontoclassify certain entries of frozen dessert bars as dairy
products under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS") subheading
2105.00.40 (1999). Plaintiff seeks an order directing reliquidation of these entries, classification
of the subject merchandise under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.50, or in the alternative under
HTSUS Subheading 0403.10.90.00, 2and a refund of all duties paid, plus interest. This Court has
exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1994), which provides for judicial review
of denied protests filed in compliance with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (1999). Pursuant
to the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with USCIT R. 52(a),
the court enters a final judgment in favor of the Defendant and against Plaintiff.
II
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff entered certain Haagen-Dazs brand frozen dessert bars from Canada, through the
Port of Detroit, Michigan, between March 30, 1999, and September 17, 1999. The subject
merchandise is comprised of two flavors of Haagen-Dazs brand frozen dessert bars. One has
t Effective March 1, 2003, the United States Customs Service was renamed the United
States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection. See Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L.
107-296, § 1502, 116 Stat. 2135, 2308-09 (2002); Reorganization Plan for the Department of
Homeland Security, H.R. Doe. No. 108-32 (2003).
2 HTSUS Subheading 0403.10.90.00 (1999), provides:
0403. Buttermilk, curdled milk, yogurt, kephir and other fermented or acidified
milk and cream, whether or not concentrated or containing added sugar or
other sweetening matter or flavored or containing added fruit, nuts orcocoa:
0403.10. Yogurt:
0403.10.90.00 Other.
chocolatesorbetontheoutsideandvanillayogurton theinside,onewith raspberrysorbetonthe
outsideandvanillayogurtontheinside) BetweenFebruary11,2000,andJuly28,2000,
CustomsclassifiedtheimportedfrozendessertbarsunderHTSUSSubheading2105.00.40,4
3 For convenience the core of both bars is herein referred to as yogurt, or the yogurt
portion. Except where explicitly addressed, this term is used for ease of reference and is not to
be construed as a finding of fact or law as to the proper classification of that portion of the
subject merchandise.
4 HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.30, through 2105.00.50 provide for:
2105.00 Ice cream and other edible ice, whether or not containing cocoa:Ice cream:
Other:
2105.00.30
Dairy products described in additional U.S. note 1
to chapter 4:
Described in additional U.S. note 10 to
chapter 4 and entered pursuant to its
provisions
2105.00.40 Other.
2105.00.50 Other.
Additional U.S. Note 1 to Chapter 4 states that "for the purposes of this schedule, the
term ....... means any of the followinggoods: malted milk, and articles of milk or cream (except (a) white chocolate and (b) inedible
dried milk powders certified to be used for calibrating infrared milk analyzers); articles
containing over 5.5 percent by weight of butterfat which are suitable for use as ingredients in the
commercial production of edible articles (except articles within the scope of other import quotas
provided for in additional U.S. notes 2 and 3 to chapter 18); or, dried milk, whey or buttennilk
(of the type provided for in subheading 0402. I0, 0402.21, 0403.90 or 0404.10) which contains
not over 5.5 percent by weight of butterfat and which is mixed with other ingredients, including
but not limited to sugar, if such mixtures contain over 16 percent milk solids by weight, are
capable of being further processed or mixed with similar or other ingredients and are not
prepared for marketing to the ultimate consumer in the identical form and package in which
imported."
assessedduty thereon at the rate of 51.7¢ plus 17.5% ad valorem, and liquidated accordingly.
Plaintiff paid all liquidated duties, fees and charges prior to the commencement of this action.
Between May 10, 2000, and July 31, 2000, Plaintiff filed four timely protests with the Port
Director at Detroit, Michigan, challenging Customs' classification. It claimed that the frozen
dessert bars were properly classified under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.50, and entitled to duty-
free entry under NAFTA. Customs denied Plaintiff's protests between July 7, 2000, and October
26, 2000. On December 18, 2000, Plaintiff commenced the instant action by filing a Summons
with the Clerk of the Court.
In its Complaint, Plaintiff claims that the subject merchandise is properly classified under
HTSUS subheading 2105.00.50, or, in the alternative, under HTSUS Subheading 0403.10.90.00,
and seeks a refund of all duties paid, plus interest. The basis of Plaintiff's claim is that the
dessert bars are neither primarily characterized by their frozen yogurt component, nor is that
component properly classified as a "product of milk" as defined in HTSUS.
Defendant claims that the dessert bars were properly classified and thus requests
judgment in its favor, affirming its classification and assessment of duties. Defendant contends
that the frozen dessert bars are properly classifiable as 'articles of milk,' a term which they
contend, under statutory interpretation and case law, is broader than 'milk.' Defendant states
that, based on industry standards for ice cream and frozen yogurt, as well as the primary
ingredients of the subject product, the frozen yogurt is the basis of the product, it's essential
nature, whereas the sorbet portion is correctly viewed as a flavoring or coating. Furthermore,
according to Defendant, the yogurt core is not, in fact yogurt, but, based on limited portion of
fermented ingredients, milk.
The parties' contentions center on classifying the subject desert bars under one of three
possible HTSUS subheadings, 2105.00.40 (requiring a finding that the yogurt portion
predominates and that said portion constitutes an article of milk or cream as defined in U.S. note
I to chapter 4 of the HTSUS), 0403.10.90.00 (requiring a finding that the yogurt portion
predominates and that said portion constitutes yogurt), or 2105.00.50 (requiring a finding that the
sorbet portion predominates). Ultimately, which of the three categories these items fall into
depends on whether essential character is the 'yogurt' portion. If the essential character is the
sorbet portion, HTSUS subheading 2105.00.50 is eliminated as a possibility. If the essential
character is the 'yogurt' portion, and this portion is properly characterized as an 'article of milk',
Customs initial finding is confirmed, lfthe 'yogurt' portion is characterized as 'yogurt', its
proper classification lies under 0403.10.90.00)
III
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Plaintiffpaid all liquidated duties and charges prior to the timely commencement of this
action. Although Customs's decisions are entitled to a presumption of correctness under 28
U.S.C. § 2639(a)(1) (1994), the Court makes its determinations upon the basis of the record
made before the Court, rather than that developed by _ • • ,
533 U.S. 218, 233 n.16, 121 S. Ct. 2164, 150 L. Ed. 2d 292 (2001). Accordingly, the Court
makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as a result of the de novo trial. Se.._ge
28 U.S.C. § 2640(a) (1994).
5 All parties agree that classification under HTSUS subheadings covering ice cream
would be inappropriate. Se._._ePretrial Order at 6.
IVFINDINGS OF FACT
A
Facts Uncontested By The Parties And Agreed To In The Pretrial Order
1. The merchandise which is the subject of this case (the "subject merchandise")
consists of frozen dessert bars. Two varieties of the subject merchandise are included in this
case: (A) one bar consists of an outer shell of raspberry flavored sorbet and an inner filling of
vanilla-flavored frozen yogurt, and (B) the second bar consists of an outer shell of chocolate-
flavored sorbet and an inner filling of vanilla-flavored frozen yogurt.
2. In their condition as imported, the dessert bars are frozen, and are packaged forretail sale. Each of the frozen dessert bars features a wooden stick which is used to hold the bars
while they are being eaten.
3. Between March 30, 1999, and September 17, 1999, Plaintiff entered at the Port of
Detroit, Michigan, under cover of consumption entries listed in the Summons, shipmentscontaining the subject merchandise; frozen dessert bars.
4. Between February 11, 2000, and July 28, 2000, the Post Director of Customs at
the Port of Detroit, Michigan liquidated the subject entries, classifying the imported frozen
dessert bars in liquidation under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.40, as "Ice cream and other edible
ice, whether or not containing cocoa: Other: Dairy products described in additional U.S. note 1
to chapter 4: Other" and assessing duty thereon at the rate of 51.7¢ plus 17.5% ad valorem.
Plaintiffpaid all liquidated duties, fees and charges prior to the commencement of this action.
5. Between May 10, 2000, and July 31, 2000, Plaintiff caused to be filed with the Port
Director of Customs at Detroit, Michigan, timely protests, challenging the classification in
liquidation of the imported merchandise, and asserting that the fiozen dessert bars are properly
classified under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.50, as "Ice cream and other edible ice, whether or
not containing cocoa: Other: Other" and entitled to duty-free enlry under NAFTA.
6. The Port Director of Customs denied Plaintiff's protests between July 7, 2000, and
October 26, 2000.
7. On December 18, 2000, Plaintifftimely commenced the instant action by filing aSummons with the Clerk of the Court.
8. Neither the imported frozen dessert bars, nor any component thereof, constitute or
consists of"ice cream," as that term is commonly or commercially known. The imported frozen
dessert bars are not classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 2105.00.05 through 2105.00.20.
9. The merchandise which is the subject of this action was also the subject of New
York Customs Ruling Letter No. D84417 (Dec. 3, 1998), in which the Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection (then the United States Customs Service) classified the subject merchandise
under HTSUS subheading 2105.00.40.
B
Facts Established At Trial
10. Plaintiff's current packaging, entered into evidence as Plaintiff's exhibit 2, differs
from the subject merchandise as imported. However, although the box has been updated, the
subject frozen dessert bars inside remain unchanged.
1 !. The current packaging states that the box contains "FAT FREE VANILLAFROZEN YOGURT COATED WITH RASPBERRY SORBET." The packaging also specifies
that "[w]e take rich, creamy Haagen-Dazs yogurt and dip it in incredibly smooth Haagen-Dazssorbet..."
12. Although the packaging specifies that the yogurt is dipped in sorbet, in
manufacturing the subject merchandise, the sorbet is, in fact, poured into a mold and chilled.
When it reaches a certain temperature a portion of the unfrozen center is "sucked back" andsaved for future use. The frozen yogurt portion is then injected into the void to create the frozen
yogurt center.
13. Haagen-Dazs' development and marketing documentation demonstrates that the
yogurt portion of the dessert bars was tested with a variety of flavorings. The documentation
indicates that the subject merchandise was consistently identified by the yogurt component. ("PI.Ex.") 11-14.
14. The yogurt portion of the subject merchandise weighs 32 grams. The raspberry
portion of that flavor of dessert bar weighs 36 grams. The chocolate portion of that flavor of
dessert bar weighs 35.9 grams? An entire dessert bar weighs approximately 71 grams.
15. The documentation entered as PI. Ex. 3, p.48, describing the ingredients used to
produce the subject merchandise, demonstrates that by weight and volume, milk is an essentialingredient.
16. By weight, milk products ( LK skim/conditioned skim milk blend and condensed
fresh US Grade A skim milk) comprise 21.43% of the total weight of subject merchandise. Byvolume, milk products comprise approximately the same percentage.
17. This percentage of milk products is approximately equal to the weight of the fruit
6 The chocolate flavor of dessert bar has been discontinued.
ingredientsin the raspberry flavored bar.
18. The weight of the milk ingredients in both types of bars are exceeded only by the
weight of the water and sweeteners
19. The court finds highly probative and credible the expert testimony of Professor
Robert L. Bradley, Jr. The court designated Professor Bradley as an expert in the production,
processing and formulas relating to frozen yogurt and yogurt.
20. Professor Bradley is currently a Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin,
where he earned his Ph.D. in 1964. From 1964 until the present, he has taught food science at
the University of Wisconsin and has published extensively. Professor Bradley holds
memberships in several professional societies and has received numerous awards. He has taught
courses in the manufacture of both yogurt and frozen yogurt.
21. Professor Bradley testified at trial that in his expert opinion the yogurt portion is
what gives the bars their essential character. His opinion is based on the industry and Code of
Federal Regulations standard of comparing solids content, a comparison of which portion is more
nutritious, and his review of Plaintiff's development, production, processing and manketingdocuments.
22. Plaintiffoffered certain product testing documents, entitled "Live and active
culture test for Haagen-Dazs fat free frozen yogurt" and admitted as PI. Ex. 8, which the court
admitted not to establish the validity of the tests or remits, but only to establish that from time to
time, the Pillsbury Company tests frozen yogurt.
23. Professor Bradley reviewed these testing documents and Plaintiff's formula
documents concerning the composition of the subject merchandise.
24. Professor Bradley testified credibly that yogurt, according to the National Yogurt
Association and under the Code of Federal Regulations, 7 is a product in which all milk solidshave been fermented.
25. The yogurt portion of the subject merchandise is not one in which all milk solidshave been fermented.
26. National Import Specialist Thomas Brady, with the National Commodity Specialist
Division of Customs, testified regarding the practices of Customs regarding classification of
7 Se.____e21 C.F.R. §§ 131.200, 131.203, 131.206 (1999) covering yogurt generally. Each
states that yogurt is a "food produced by culturing one or more of the optional dairy ingredients
specified in paragraph (c) of this section with a characterizing bacterial culture that contains the
lactic acid-producing bacteria, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus."
merchandiseundertheprovisionsof Heading 2105. This testimony was credible and probative.
27. The decision to classify the subject merchandise under 2105.00.40 was based on
the agency's determination that the frozen desert bars constituted an "article of milk or cream"
under HTSUS additional U.S. note l to chapter 4.
28. Brian Sweet, Product Quality Manager for Haagen-Dazs testified. Mr. Sweet
identified the subject merchandise, and discussed how it is manufactured. He testified as to the
formulation of the components. He also described the marketing plans and product development
within Pillsbury during the time of the subject entries. His testimony was credible and probative.
29. The product does not contain full cream milk, or skimmed milk.
30. The yogurt portion of the subject merchandise is made from 88% by weight of a
"vanilla flavored ice milk base" and 12% by weight of a "yogurt base."
31. The "vanilla flavored ice milk base" portion of the yogurt core is made from [a
percentage] by weight of a reduced lactose skim milk blend, together with [a percentage of]
liquid amber sugar, [a percentage of] corn syrup solids, [a percentage] of a blend of corn syrup
and liquid sugar, [a percentage] of charcoal-filtered water, and [a percentage of] specialty corn
syrup solids.
32. The "yogurt base" portion of the yogurt core is made from [a percentage] by
weight of condensed fresh U.S. Grade A skim milk, [a percentage of] charcoal-filtered water,
and [a percentage of certain types of] yogurt cultures.
33. Of the yogurt portion, only a very small percentage actually contained yogurt
cultures. This percentage is diluted with the "vanilla flavored ice-milk base" to provide theflavor of yogurt.
34. Once the "yogurt base" and "vanilla flavored ice-milk base" are mixed, there is no
further fermentation due to the concentration of sugars.
35. The vanilla flavored ice-milk base which made up a majority of the 'yogurt'portion was never fermented
36. Plaintiffoffered into evidence the requirements of the National Yogurt Associationfor live and active culture yogurt. PI. Ex. 7.
37. Based on these standards, as well as the testimony of Prof. Bradley and Mr. Sweet,
in order to meet the criteria of the National Yogurt Association criteria for live and active culture
yogurt, sampling and analytical procedures National Yogurt Association, a product must, inter
alia, contain a certain level of active cultures, l0 7 CFU per gram, at the end of the stated shelf
life, and have a certain titratable acidity, at least 0.15%, obtained from fermentation.
38. Plaintiff failed to establish through credible evidence that the yogurt portion of the
subject merchandise contained the requisite level of active cultures at the end of the stated shelflife.
39. Plaintiff failed to establish through credible evidence that the yogurt portion of the
subject merchandise had the requisite titratable acidity as a result of fermentation.
40. If any of these Findings of Fact shall more properly be Conclusions of Law, theyshall be deemed to be so.
V
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Plaintiffdid not meet its burden of proving that the imported desert bars are not
within the scope of the tariffprovision for "article[s] of milk or cream" of a kind described inadditional U.S. Note 1 to HTSUS Chapter 4.
2. Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, the court finds the essential character of the
subject merchandise to be the yogurt portion of the dessert bar. 8 The subject bars are composite
goods, consisting of two or more materials or components classi fled in different headings of the
tariff, frozen yogurt portion under 2105.00.40, and sorbet portion classifiable under 2105.00.50.
The essential character of an entry is "that attribute which strongly marks or serves to distinguish
what it is. Its essential character is that which is indispensable to the structure, core or condition
of the article, i.e., what it is. Webster's Third New International Dictionary, 1966 edition." Oak
Laminates D/O Oak Materials Group v. United States, 8 CIT 175, 180 (1984) (citing United
•, Cust. Ct. 386, C.D. 3637, 293 F. Supp. 734 (1968)). The
marketing of the merchandise, the weight and volume of the ingredients, and the product itself, in
addition to other facts revealed at trial support this conclusion. The court in Mead Corp..v.
8 General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) states that:
Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different materials or made up of
different components, and goods put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot be
classified by reference to 3(a), shall be classified as if they consisted of the
material or component which gives them their essential character, insofar as this
criterion is applicable.
Explanatory note to General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) states that "[t]he factor which
determines essential character will vary by the nature of the material or component, its bulk,
quantity, weight or value, or by the role of a constituent material in relation to the use of the
goods."
10
United States, 283 F.3d 1342, 1349 (Fed. Cir., 2002), explained that "[w]hile the importer's
marketing of the goods will not dictate the classification, such evidence is relevant to thedetermination." Thus, in accordance with General Rule of Interpretation No. 3 (b), this court
finds that the yogurt portion gives the merchandise its essential character.
3. HTSUS subheading 2105.00.40 covers "Ice cream and other edible ice, whether or
not containing cocoa: Other: Dairy products described in additional U.S. note 1 to chapter 4:
Other." The court finds that the yogurt portion of dessert bars constitutes a dairy product
described in additional U.S. note I to Chapter 4 of the HTSUS, given that this portion is not
entirely fermented and based upon the nature of the ingredients used.
4. Note 1 to Chapter 4 of the HTSUS states that "It]he expression 'milk' means full
cream milk or partially or completely skimmed milk."
5. Additional U.S. note 1 to Chapter 4 of the HTSUS states that "[f]or the purposes of
this schedule, the term 'dairy products described in additional U.S. note 1 to chapter 4' means
and of the following goods: malted milk, and articles of milk or cream..." Thus, the range of
items covered by "dairy products described in additional U.S. note I to chapter 4", are broaderthan full cream milk or partially or completely skimmed milk.
6. As the court explained in United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Inc., 57 CCPA 102,
426 F.2d 1308 (197 1 F.3d 224 (1994), the name
under which merchandise is marketed is not dispositive for classification purposes. Thus, the
fact that Plaintiff routinely refers to the core as "yogurt" and markets the dessert bars that way is
not sufficient to establish then, legal classification as yogurt.
7. As the fermented part comprises only about 12% of the yogurt portion, this court
finds that it would be improper to classify the entire yogurt portion, and thus the entire entry, as
yogurt.
8. Merchandise must be examined to determine whether, as imported, it contains thenamed ingredients.. 17 CIT 650 (1993). Here the merchandise was
not comprised chiefly of yogurt as imported. The dessert bars did contain articles of milk or
cream as defined in HTSUS additional U.S. note 1 to Chapter 4.
9. By operation of the finding that the subject merchandise contains articles of milk or
cream, the dessert bars cannot be classified under HTSUS heading 0403 covering YOGURT.
The Explanatory Notes discuss the scope of Chapter 4, which includes the "yogurt" of HTSUS
heading 0403, it states:
The Chapter also excludes, inter alia, the following:
(c) Ice cream and other edible ice (heading 21.05).
11
HarmonizedCommoditydutyDescriptionandCodingsystem,ExplanatoryNotes(lst ed.1986)at30.
10. Asaconfection,dessert,ornovelty,thesubjectmerchandiseisproperlycovered
by HTSUS heading 2105.
11. Because the evidence shows that the subject merchandise is an article of milk as
defined in U.S. note 1 to chapter 4 of the HTSUS, the court finds that the merchandise is properly
classified under HTSUS subheading 2105.00.40.
12. Accordingly, Plaintiffhas failed to overcome the presumption of correctness,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2639(a) (1994), that attaches to Customs' classification decisions.
13. If any of these Conclusions of Law shall more properly be Findings of Fact, theyshall be deemed to be so.
Dated: July 12, 2004New York, New York
/s/Evan. J. Wallach
Judge
12
U.S. Court oflntemational Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?347047554...
U.S. Court of International Trade
LIVE Database (New York)CIT DOCKET FOR CASE #: l:00-cv-00570-EJW
The Pillsbury Company v. United States
Assigned to: Evan J. Wallach
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction:
28USC § 1581(a) Denied Protest(s)
Category:
Classification 19USC § 1514(a)(2)
Rate of Duty 19USC § 1514(a)(2)
Agency:U.S. Customs Service
Product Description:
Frozen Sorbet/Yogurt Bars
Export Country:
Date Filed: 12/18/00
Jury Demand: N
Date Terminated: 07/12/2004
Date Reopened:
Plaintiff
The Pillsbury Company represented by John M. Peterson
Neville Peterson, LLP
17 State Street
19th Floor
New York, NY 10004
(212) 635-2730
Fax : (212) 635-2734
Email: [email protected]
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
13
U.S. Court of International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?347047554.
United States represented by Saul Davis
U.S. Department of JusticeInternational Trade Field Office
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-3584
Fax : (212) 264-1916
Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Filing Date
12/18/2000
12/18/2000
12/18/2000
07/05/2001
03/13/2002
#
1
2
3
14
Docket Text
Summons filed by John M Peterson of Neville,Peterson & Williams on behalf of The Pillsbury
Company. Filing fee collected, receipt #w/finance.
(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 12/26/2000)
Form 5 Information Statement filed by John MPeterson of Neville, Peterson & Williams on behalf
of The Pillsbury Company. (Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 12/26/2000)
Form 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed byJohn M Peterson of Neville, Peterson & Williams
on behalf of The Pillsbury Company. (Ricci,
Rebecca) (Entered: 12/26/2000)
Complaint against United States. Answer due by4/25/2002. Filed by John M Peterson of Neville,
Peterson & Williams on behalf of The Pillsbury
Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/13/2002)
All docket entries prior to the date of this entry are
contained in the attached docket sheet (5-13).
(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/13/2002)
14
U.S. Court of Intemational Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... g I https//ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?314604935
11/08/2002 22 Consent Motion for extension of time until
3/28/2002 to complete discovery and until 12/27/02
to respond to Deft's interrogatories and request for
production of documents. Filed by John M Peterson
I of Neville, Peterson LLP on behalf of The (Entered:
I11/26/2002 [ Order signed on granting Motion for23 1 1/26/2002
i extension of time to complete discovery(Relatedj Doc # 22). Responses due by 12/27/2002. (Ricci,
Rebecca) (Entered: 11/27/2002)...................................................................................
12/27/2002 24 Motion for extension of time until 1/24/2003 to
respond to Deft's interrogatories and request forproduction of documents. Responses due by
1/15/2003. Filed by John M. Peterson of Neville
Peterson LLP. on behalf of The Pillsbury Compan
(Entered: 12/30/2002).................. i ........... [ ....................................
12/31/2002 25 Response in consent to motion for EOT (related to
, motions(s)2_4.). Filed by Saul Davis of U.S., Department of Justice on behalf of United
. States.(Ricci, Rebecca)(Entered: 01/02/2003)......................................................................................
01/07/2003 2_6 Order signed on 1/7/2003 granting Motion forextension of time (Related Doc # 24). Response to
Deft's interrogatories and request for production due
by 1/24/2003. (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
01/07/2003).......................................................................................................................
01/09/2003
01 / 15/2003
2.7
28
Consent Motion for protective order. Filed by JohnM. Peterson of Neville Peterson LLP. on behalf of
The Pillsbury Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
01 / 13/2003).................................................................................
Order signed on 1/15/2003 granting Motion for
protective order (Related Doc # 27). (Ricci,
Rebecca) (Entered: 01 / 15/2003)
15
U.S. Court of International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock...171 https//ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt p19314604935.
o4,ii;ioo2.......I.....I
05/29/2002
07/10/2002
t ...................
07/] 5/2002
08/05/2002
09/05/2002
09/10/2002
]5 Answer to complaint (Related Doc # 4). Filed bySaul Davis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf
of United States.(Taronji, Steve) (Entered:'04/26/2002)
Order signed on 5/29/2002 assigning action to
Judge Evan J. Wallach.(Taylor, Marlene) (Entered:05/29/2002)
....
17 Consent Motion for leave to file joint statement of
jurisdiction out of time and request for change oftime for scheduling conference. Responses due by
7/22/2002. Filed by John M Peterson of Neville,
Peterson LLP on behalf of The Pillsbury Com(Entered: 11/13/2002)
.............................................................. I
18 Order signed on 7/15/2002. Pltf's consent motion for
leave to file joint statement out of time is Granted.Pltf's request for change of time for scheduling
conference is granted in part and denied in part
subject to rescheduling by the co (Entered:
11/13/2002)
19
20
Order signed on 8/5/2002 Discovery due by
12/16/2002.(Warner, Scott) (Entered: 08/05/2002)
Consent Motion for Extension of Time Until
1 l/l 1/2002 to Respond to Deft's Interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents. Filed by John ,
M. Peterson of Neville, Peterson LLP. on behalf of
The Pillsbury Company. (Warner, Scott) (Entered: i
09/09/2002) ,i................................................
Order signed on 9/10/2002 granting Motion for
extension of time. ORDERED: Pltf shall respond to
Defl's interrogatories and request for production of
documents by 11/I 1/02. (Related Doc # 20).
(Warner, Scott) (Entered: 09/I 0/2002)
21
16
U.S.Courtof International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... _ l https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-binJDktRpt.pl?314604935...
Davis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf ofUnited States.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
04/10/2003).......................................................................................................................................
04/15/2003 36 Order signed on 4/15/2003 granting Motion for
extension of time to complete discovery until
7/30/03(Related Doc # 3_5_).(Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 04/15/2003)
........................................ _...........................................................................
07/07/2003 37 Consent Motion for extension of time until
9/30/2003 to complete discovery. Filed by John M.Peterson of Neville Peterson LLP. on behalf of The
, Pillsbury Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
07/09/2003)[ .............................................................................................................
07/10/2003 38 I Status conference to be held on 7/16/03 at 1 l:00 am
in Courtroom l.. (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
07/10/2003)..........................................................................................................................
07/16/2003 39 Status Conference held on 7/16/03 at 11:00 am in
Courtroom 1.. (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:07/16/2003)
..................................................................
07/24/2003 , 4_0 Order signed on 7/24/2003 granting Motion for] extension of time to complete discovery(Related1I Doc # 3.7). Discovery due by 9/30/2003. (Ricci,
....................... _Re_b_ecca!.!Ent.ered1.07_/.24!2003.! ..........................
10/06/2003 ! 41 Order signed on 10/6/2003 Trial scheduled for4 11/13/03 at the Court of International Trade,r Courtroom 1 at 9:00 am..(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
10/06/2003)
11/03/2003 _12 Consent Motion for extension of time until
11/5/2003 tofile pretrial order. Filed by John M.Peterson of Neville Peterson LLP. on behalf of The
Pillsbury Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
11/04/2003)
17
U.S. Court of International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... 91 https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?314604935..
02/19/2003
02/28/2003
03/06/2003
03/06/2003
03/31/2003
04/03/2003
04/09/2003
2_9. Consent Motion for extension of time until
4/18/2003 to respond to interrogatories and request
for production of documents, Consent Motion to
amenddiscovery schedule to end on 5/31/03. Filed
by Curtis Walter Knauss of Neville Peterson L
(Entered: 02/20/2003)
3_0
3_!
32
34
35
Consent Motion to alter/amend/correct complaint.
With proposed amended complaint (public &
comfidential). Filed by Curtis Walter Knauss of
Neville Peterson LLP. on behalf of The Pillsbury
Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/04/2003)
Order signed on 3/6/2003 granting Motion to file
first amended complaint (Related Doc #3_0). (Ricci,
Rebecca) (Entered: 03/06/2003)
First Amended complaint deemed filed (public and
confidential) against United States. Filed by Curtis
Walter Knauss of Neville Peterson LLP. on behalf
of The Pillsbury Company.(Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 03/06/2003)
Consent Motion for leave to file answer to amended
complaint out of time and for extention of time until
entry of this order, with proposed answer. Filed by
Saul Davis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf
of United States.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
04/01/2003)
Order signed on 4/3/2003 granting Motion for leave
to file answer out of time, and for extension of time;
Deft's answer to amended complaint deemed filed
(Related Doe # 33). (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
04/03/2003)
Consent Motion for extension of time until
7/30/2003 to complete discovery. Filed by Saul
18
U.S. Court of International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... L I https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?314604935...
03/08/2004)
........................................................................................................................................
03/10/2004 5__22 Order signed on 3/10/2004 granting Motion for
extension of time to file post trial brief until
3/19/04(Related Doe # 51). (Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 03/10/2004)
.....................................................................................................................................................
03/19/2004 53 Consent Motion for excess pages, Consent Motion
for leave to file out of time a motion for EOT to file
Deft's post-trial brief Filed by Saul Davis of U.S.
Department of Justice on behalf of United
States.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/19/2004).............................................................................................................................
03/22/2004 54 Order signed on 3/22/2004 granting Motion for
excess pages, brief may not exceed forty pages
(Related Doc # 5__3_),granting Motion for leave to file
out of time an EOT until 3/24/04 for Deft to file
post-trial brief(Related Doc # 53). (Ricci, Rebec
(Entered: 03/22/2004)..............................................................................
03/24/2004 55 Confidential Post-trial Brief. Filed by Saul Davis of
U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of United
States. (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 03/25/2004)..............................................................................................................
07/12/2004 5_6 Order signed on 7/12/2004, Slip Op. 04-84;
Confidential Version Issued. ORDERED: Judgment
is hereby entered in favor of Defendant..(Taronji,
Steve) (Entered: 07/12/2004)
.........................................................................................................................
08/19/2004 57 Letter regarding confidential information in Court's
opinion. Filed by Saul Davis of U.S. Department of
Justice on behalf of United States. (Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 08/20/2004).........................................................................................................................................
08/19/2004 58 Consent Motion for leave to file out of time a letter
' regarding confidential matter. Responses due by
9/7/2004. Filed by John M. Peterson of Neville
Peterson, LLP on behalf of The Pillsbury
19
U.S. Court of International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock... 81 https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?314604935..
11/04/2003
11/05/2003
I I/06/2003
11/14/2003
12/01/2003
01/20/2004
02/20/2004
02/24/2004
_4_3
_44
45
46
47
Order signed on 11/4/2003 granting Motion forextension of time until 11/5/03 for parties to file
pretrial order(Related Doc # 42). (Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 11/04/2003)
Proposed pretrial order. Filed by Saul Davis of U.S.Department- of Justice on behalf of all parties.
(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 11/06/2003)
Pretrial Order signed on 11/6/2003..(Ricci,
Rebecca) (Entered: I1/06/2003)
Trial held on 11/13/03 and 11/14/03 at 9:00 am in
Courtroom 1.. (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:11/14/2003)
Transcript (confidential) of Trial held on11/13/2003 filed with court. (Ricci, Rebecca)
(Entered: 12/02/2003)
48
4_
5_0
Brief (post-trial). Filed by John M. Peterson of
Neville Peterson LLP. on behalf of The Pillsbury
Company. (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 01/22/2004)
Consent Motion for extension of time until 3/9/2004
to file brief(Post-trial). Filed by Saul Davis of U.S.
Department o f Justice on behalf of UnitedStates.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 02/23/2004)
L ..........................................
i Order signed on 2/24/2004 granting Motion forII extension of time until 3/9/04 to file Post-brief
i (Related Doc # 49). (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
02/24/2004)
03/05/2004 51!IConsent Motion for extension of time until
3/19/2004 to file brief(post-trail). Filed by Saul ,i
Davis of U.S. Department of Justice on behalf of ]
United States.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: i
20
6L,4tJ I
21
U.S.Court of International Trade (LIVE Database) - Dock...0E https://ecf.cit.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?314604935..
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
09/10/2004
i
I
I
iI ..........
09/23/2004
50_
60
.6_1
I
!
i
62
Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered: 08/23/2004)
Order entered on 8/30/2004 granting Pltf's consent
motion, out of time, to file identified confidential
matter. Ordered: Pltfis granted until 8/19/2004 to
file comments regarding the bracketing of
proprietary information in The Pillsbury Co. v
(Entered: 08/30/2004)
Order entered on 8/30/2004, Public Slip Op.04-84
issued. (related document(s)56) .(Taronji, Steve)(Entered: 08/31/2004)
Notice of appeal of Slip Op. 04-84 filed. Filing fee
paid in amount of 255.00. Receipt no. w/finance(related document(s)56,5_6). Filed by John M.
Peterson of Neville Peterson, LLP on behalf of The
Pillsbury Company.(Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:09/13/2004)
Appeal of Slip Op. 04-84 docketed on 9/17/2004 by
the USCAFC as appeal no. 04-1591 (relateddocument(s)6J ). (Ricci, Rebecca) (Entered:
09/23/2004)
22
Attorneys
Plaintiff(s)
John Peterson
Neville Peterson & Williams
80 Broad Street
34th Floor
New York, NY 10004
(212) 635-2730
Defendant(s)
23
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
120, 180
oo-zlS_OOKSe_ONumber 28 USC, 1,581(a)uunsofcuon Judge
Short Title
Pillsbury V. US
Administrative Investigation Information
Frozen Sorbet/Yogurt bars
Governmenl Agency: Treasury (xx)
Fee Paid 120 Receipt No.
I.T.C.( ) D.O.C.( ) D.O.L.( ) Other( )
Date Dec 20/00 Jury Demand( )
Tiile
The Pillsbury Company
PLAINTIFF(S)V.
United States
DEFENDANT(S)
24 DS-1A ( 4-1 2/Y
I I I I ....
25
00-I 2-00570 Pillsbury
Docket Number Plaintiff
Date Proceedings Int.(Filing/Entry)
(,) ','uw,",' ....Dec 18/00 Summons filed.
(2 } TOWIT
Dec 18/00 Form 5 filed.
(3) TOWITD_c 18/00(4) to wit
July 5/01(5)Sept 7/0h
6)
Se_)19/01
Oct 3/01
(8)Oct 4/01
Nov 19/01
Form 13 filed bv PILLSBURY.
Complaint filed.
Deft filed consent motion for EOT until ]O/lh/hl _n
respond to Pltf's complaint.
Deft's consent motion for EOT(#5) GRANTED.
Deft filed consent motion for EOT to respond to complain'iuntll Nov 2b/ol. ,
Deft's consent motion _7 GRANTED.
Deft filed consent motion fo@ EOT until January 25,2002
to respond to pltf's complaint.
rrl2/
rrl2/
rr]_l
_ 7
ss 9/
o_
rrlq
!rrlO
stllj
(i0)
Nov 20/01 Deft consent motion for EOT until January 25,2002 to
respond to pltf's complaint (#9) GRANTED. stll/
(II)
3an. 23/02
(Az)
Deft filed coDsent _tiop for EOT until April 25, 2002
to respond to pltf's complaint. gg 1
Jan. 25/02 Deft consent motion for EOT until April 25, 2002 to
respond to pltf's complaint (#II) GRANTED. gg 1
(13) TO WIT2/26/02 Plaintiff fl]_a amm_na=d/cnrrected pm_m !3, laa 3/
26
DS-2 (7,/92 2M)
(
0
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
THE PILLSBURY COMPANY, )
)Plaintiff, )
)V. )
)UNITED STATES, )
)))
Defendant.
Court No. 00-12-00570
Plaintiff, by its undersigned attorneys, for its Complaint does hereby state artd allege as
follows:
CAUSE OF ACTION
1. This action is brought to contest the denial, by the United States Customs Service, of
plaintiff's protest challenging the tariff classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States 0-1TSUS), of certain import entries of frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars fi'om Canada.
/I_J_2UI.CT3.O_
2. This Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a).
3. All liquidated duties, fees and charges were paid prior to the commencement of this
action.
27
1If
!
]. --
• ql
|,
STATEMENT OF FACTS
4. Between March 30, 1999 and September 17, 1999, Piaintiffentered at the Port of Detroit,
Michigan, under cover of consumption entries listed in the Summons in this action shipments
containing Haagen-Dazs brand "frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars". The frozen sorbet-yogurt bars
are the product of Canada.
5. Between February 11, 2000 and July 28, 2000, the Port Director of Customs at the Port
of Detroit, Michigan liquidated the subject entries, classifying the imported frozen sorbet/yogurt
dessert bars in liquidation under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.40, as "lee erearn and other edible ice,
whether or not containing cocoa: Other [than ice cream]: Dairy products described in Additional
U.S. Note 1 to Chapter 4; Other [than goods described in General Note 15 of the Tariff Schedule or
Additional U.S. Note 4 to I-ITS Chapter 21]{' and assessing duty thereon at the rate of 50.2¢ per
kilogram plus 17% ad valorem.
6. Between May 10, 2000 and July 30, 2000, Plaintiff caused to be filed with the Port
Director of Customs at DeO'oit, Michigan, timely protests, challenging the classification in
liquidation of the imported merchandise, and asserting that the merchandise was properly classified
under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.50, as 'qce cream and other ed_le ice, whether or not containing
28
I
f.. ....
) •
cocoa; Other [than ice cream]: Other: Other [than Dairy products described in Additional U.S. Note
1 to Chapter 21 ]" and entitled to duty-free entry, as Products of Canada which are "originating", for
purposes of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
7. The Port Director of Customs denied Plaintiff's protests between July 7, 2000 and
October 26, 2000.
8. On December 18, 2000, Plaintiff timely commenced the instant action by filing a
Summons with the Clerk of the Court.
COUNT I (RAS,PBERRY SORBET/VANILLA YOGUBT BAR)
9. Paragraphs l through 8 are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
10. The merchandise which is the subject of the instant case is a frozen dessert confection
consisting offi'ozen yogurt and sorbet, and labeled as either "Raspberry Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar"
or "Chocolate Sorbet/Vaniila Yogurt Bar". Both products are imported and sold bearing the Hiiagen-
Dazs trademark, which is registered to, and owned by, plaintiff.
1 I. In its condition as imported, the Raspberry Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt bar is a ready-to-eat
frozen confection, containing an outer layer of frozen raspberry sorbet which coats an inner core of
vanilla-flavored frozen yogurt. The product features a wooden stick, inserted at the bottom, to allow
29
forreadyhandlingby consumers.
12. The RaspberrySorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar is composed of the following ingredients,
listed in descending order of their relative volume and weight as they appear in the product: charcoal
filtered water, seedless raspberry puree, of a blend of skim milk and conditioned skim milk, corn
syrup/liquid sugar blend, liquid amber sugar, corn syrup solids, and minor quantities of speciality
corn syrup solids, frozen raspberry juice concentrate, pectin, vanilla extract, concentrated lemon
juice and yogurt cultures. The total milk solids present in the product in its condition as imported
account for less than 6% of the product's weight.
13. The milk and skim milk products used in the manufacture of the Raspberry
SorbetNanillaYogurtBar accountforaminor percentageofthecostofproducingthesearticles.
14. The RaspbcrrySorbeffVanilla Yogurt Bar is not malted milk, does not contain 5.5% by
weight of butter or butterfat, is not capable of being further processed or mixed with similar or other
ingredients, is in fact prepared for marketing to the ultimate consmcr in the form in which
imported, is not an "article of milk or cream," and is packaged ready for sale to retail consumers.
15. The Raspberry Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar is an "originating" product of Canada for
purposes of the North American Free Trade Agreement 0NAFrA).
16. Accordingly, as imported, Raspberry Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar is not a "Dairy product
30
described in Additional U.S. Note 1 to HTS Chapter 4, but is instead properly classifiable under
HTSUS Subheading2105.00.50,and isentitledtoentertheUnitedStatesfreeofdutyas aNAFTA
"originating"productofCanada.
COUNT H {CHOCOLATE SORBET/VANILLA YOGURT BAR)
17. Paragraphs 1 through 8 are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
18.The merchandisewhich isthesubjectoftheinstantcaseisafrozendessertconfection
consistingoffrozenyogurtand sorbet,and labeledaseither"RaspberrySorbet/VanillaYogurtBar"
or"ChocolateSorbet/VanillaYogurtBar".Bothproductsareimportedand soldbearingtheH_gcn-
Dazs a'ademark,which isregisteredto,and owned by,plaintiff.
]9. In its condition as imported, the Chocolate Sorbet/Vanflla Yogurt bar is a ready-to-eat
frozen confection, containing an outer layer of frozen chocolate-flavored sorbct which coats an inner
core of vanilla-flavored frozen yogurt. The product features a wooden stick, inserted at the bottom,
to allow for ready handling by consumers.
20. The Chocolate Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar is composed of the following ingredients,
shown in descending order of their relative volume and weight as they appear in the product: water,
31
cornsyrup, skim milk, liquid sugar, egg whites, conditioned skim milk, specialty corn syrup,
defattcd cocoa, and small quantities of specialty corn syrup solids, cocoa syrups, pectin, vanilla
extracts, salt and yogurt cultures.
21. The skim milk and conditioned skim milk products contained in the Chocolate
Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar, taken together, account for a minor percentage of the cost of the sorbet
bars, and milk solids account for less than 6% of the bars, on a full weight basis.
22. The Chocolate Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar is not malted milk, does not contain 5.5% by
weight of butter or butterfat, is not capable of being further processed or mixed with similar or other
ingredients, is in fact prepared for marketing to the ultimate consumer in the form in which
imported, is not an "article of milk or cream," is packaged ready for sale to retail consumers.
23. The Chocolate Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar is an "originating" product of Canada, for
purposes oft.he North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
24.Accordingly,asimported,ChocolateSorbet/VaniUaYogurtBar isproperlyclassifiable
under HTSUS subheading2105.00.50,and isentitledto entertheUnited Statesfi'eeof dutyas
NAFTA-originatingarticleofCanada.
32
COUNT HI fALTER.NATIVE CLAIM AS TO BOTH PRODUCTS)
25. Paragraphs 1 through 24 are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
26. In their condition as imported, the Raspberry Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt bars and the
Chocolate Sorbet/VaniUa Yogurt Bars are "composite" goods, composed of two materials: fi'ozen
yogurt and frozen sorbet (edible ice).
27. Pursuant to General Rule of Interpretation 3('o) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule,
composite goods are to be classified as if they consisted of that material or component which imparts
the "essential character" to the good.
28. Pursuant to General Rule of Interpretation 3(c) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule,
where no single component or material comprising a "composite good" can be identified as
imparting the essential character to the good, the good is to be classified as if it consisted of that
component or material which occurs last in numerical order in the tariff, among those which merit
equal consideration.
29. Frozen yogurt is classifiable as "Ice Cream" under HTS subheadings 2 ]05.00.05 through
2105.00.20.
30.Frozensorbetisclassifiableas"'Icecream and otheredibleice:Other [thanicecream];
33
Other [than Dairy products described in Additional U.S. Note 1 to Chapter 4" of the HI'S, under
HTS subheading 2105.00.50.
31. The frozen sorbet components of these articles is the component which imparts the
essential character thereto, in that the frozen sorbet is the predominant component by weight,
volume and functional importance to the article as a whole.
32. By operation of General Rule of Interpretation 3('o) to the HTS, these products are
classifiable under HTS subheading 2105.00.50, and are entitled to enter the United States duty free
as NAFTA "originating" products of Canada.
33. In the alternative, if these products are determined to be composite goods whose
essential character is imparted by their frozen yogurt component, they are properly classifiable under
HTS subheadings 2105.00.10 [if Described in Additional U.S. Note 5 to Chapter 21 and entered
pursuant to its provisions], duty flee as NAFTA "originating products of Canada" or under HTS
subheading 2105.00.20.
34. In the alternative, if these products are determined to be composite goods whose essential
character component cannot be determined, they are properly classifiable pursuant to General Rule
of Interpretation 3 (c) to the HTS under subheading 2105.00.50, and are entitled to duty-free entry
as NAFTA "originating" products of Canada.
34
|
PRAYER_OR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffpmys that this Court enter judgmem in its favor, and enter an order
directing thePort Director of Customs at Detroit, Michigan to reliquidate the entries which are the
subject of this ease, classifying the subject merchandise under HTSUS Subheading 2105.00.50, and
entitled to duty free entry as NAFTA "originating" products of Canada; or, in the alternative, to
reliquidate the entries under HTSUS subheading 2105.00.10, entitled to duty-free entry as NAFTA
"originating" products of Canada; and issuing to Plaintiff refunds of all duties paid, plus interest
as provided by law; and granting Plaintiffsueh further and additional relief as this Court may deem
just.
Dated: July 5, 2001
Respectfully submitted,
Neville, Peterson LLPCounsel for Plaintiff
The Pillsbury Company
80 Broad Street, 34 _ Floor
New York, New/_k 10004
B_A4_(212)635-27 V
M. e,erso /_urtis W. Knauss
35
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that ] caused a copy of the annexed document to be served, by
first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon:
July 5, 2001
Attorney in Charge
United States Department of JusticeCivil Division, Commercial Litigation BranchInternational Trade Field Office
26 Federal Plaza
Room 346
New York, New York 10278
36
,-r,_' '-'-_ ,".FtLEO_._.,.,,_ ,......
2001JUL-q P 2:55
{.....-.. :',;:
Ifll_- "'"" "" '' " "r ' "-'" ' " ; ."o'''
!_',' ,:._ ......
,_" '."
... ;f'..
i . ..°&_. . .• ml
] , _'_
,'-: . . -/ ; ...," ._ .... "-, "_::: '_._i
,_',t._.% ' j'
|o •
-- 3?
38
b
ORIGINALUNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
THE PILLSBURY COMPANY,
UNITED STATES,
V.
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
Court No. 00-12-00570
hNSWER TO ¢OrvmLAINT
Pursaumt to Rule 7(a) of the Rules of the United States Court ofl.ntemational Trade, the
United States, defendant, responds to the allegations of plaintiffs complaint as follows:
1. Denies that the merchandise is "frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars." Avers that the
merchandise is frozen yogurt bars coated with sorbet. Admits the remaining allegations of this
paragraph.
2. Admits.
3. Admits.
4. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to whether
the merchandise is the product of Canada. Denies that the merchandise is "frozen sorbet/yogurt
dessert bars." Admits the remainder of the allegations set forth in this paragraph.
5. Denies that Subheading 2105.00.40 provides as quoted. Avers that Subheading
2105.00.40 is the best evidence of its contents. Denies that the merchandise is "frozen
sorbet/yogurt dessert bars." Denies that duty was assessed on the merchandise at a rate of 50.2¢
per kilogram plus 17% ad valorem and avers that the duty assessed was at a rate of 51.7¢ per
kilogram plus 17%ad valorem. Admits the remaining allegations set forth in this paragraph.
39
6. Admitsthatplaintiff ftlcd timely protests at Detroit, Michigan, between May I0 and
July 31 (not July 30), 2000, challenging the classification of the merchandise upon liquidation_
Denies the remaining allegations of the paragraph and avers that the protests are the best
evidence of their contents.
7. Admits.
8. Admits.
COUNT I (RASPBERRY SORBET/VANILLA YOGURT BAR)
9. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 8, as if set forth in full herein.
I0. Denies that the merchandise is a frozen dessert confection consisting of frozen yogurt
and sorbet and avers that the merchandise consists of a frozen yogurt bar covered with a sorbet
coating. Denies that the merchandise is labeled as either "Raspberry Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar"
or "Chocolate Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar" and avers that the merchandise is labeled as either
"Frozen Yogurt Raspberry & Vanilla" and "Frozen Yogurt Chocolate & Vanilla" and is invoiced
as either "I-I. Dazs Rasp/Van Yogurt Bar" or 'q-hagen Dazs Yog Choc/Van Bar." Admits both
products are imported bearing the Hiiagen Daze trademark. Denies the remaining allegations for
lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters
asserted.
11. Denies the allegations of the first sentence and avers that the merchandise is a ready
to eat article of milk or cream containing frozen yogurt with a raspberry sorbet coating. Admits
the allegations of the second sentence.
40
12.Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
13. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
14. Denies that the merchandise is not an "article of milk or cream." AdmSts the article
is prepared for marketing to the ultimate consumer in the form in which imported and is
packaged ready for sale to retail consumers. Denies the remaining allegations set forth in this
paragraph for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as io the truth of the
matter asserted.
15. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
16. Doxies.
COUNT II (CHOCOLATE SORBET/VANILLA YOGURT BAR)
17. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations of Paragraphs 1
through8,asifsetforthinfullherein.
18. Deniesthatthemerchandiseisa frozendessertconfectionconsistingoffrozenyogurt
and sorbetand aversthatthemerchandiseconsistsofafrozenyogurtbar coveredwithasorbet
coating.Deniesthatthemerchandiseislabeledaseither"RaspberrySorbet/VanillaYogurtBar"
or"ChocolateSorbet/VanillaYogurtBar" and aversthatthemerchandiseislabeledaseither
"FrozenYogurtRaspberry& Vanilla"and "FrozenYogurtChocolate& Vanilla"and isinvoiced
aseither'2-I.Dazs Rasp/Van YogurtBar" or'q-hagenDazs Yog Choc/Van Bar." Admits both
productsareimportedbearingtheHtiagenDazs tradclnark.Deniestheremainingallegationsfor
41
lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters
asserted.
19. Denies the allegations of the first sentence and avers that the merchandise is a ready
to eat article of milk or cream containing fi'ozen yogurt with a raspberry sorbet coating. Admits
the allegations of the second sentence.
20. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
21. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
22. Denies that the merchandise is not an "article of milk or cream." Admits the article
is prepared for marketing to the ultimate consumer in the form in which it is imported, and is
packaged ready for sale to retail consumers. Denies the remaining allegations set forth in this
paragraph for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
matters asserted.
23. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
24. Denies.
COUNT HI _ALT_ERNATIVE CLAIMS AS TO BOTH PRODUCTS)
25. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations of Paragraphs 1
through 24, as if set forth in full herein.
26. Denies.
42
6
27. Thisallegationconsistsoflegalargument and no responseisrequired.Ifaresponse
is required, admits.
28. This allegation consists of legal argument and no response is required. Ifa response
is required, admits.
29. Admits, provided that the "frozen yogurt" meets all of the legal requirements for ice
cream, such as, but not limited to, the 10% milk fat requirement; otherwise, denies..
30. Admits, provided that the "frozen sorbet" does not meet the requirements of any of
the preceding subheadings of Heading 2105; otherwise, denies.
31. Denies.
32. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to whether
the frozen yogurt bars with sorbet coating are originating products of Canada for NAFTA
purposes. Denies the remaining allegations of this paragraph.
33. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to whether
the frozen yogurt bars with sorbct coating are originating products of Canada for NAFI'A
purposes. Denies the remaining allegations of this paragraph.
34. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to whether
the frozen yogurt bars with sorbet coating are originating products of Canada for NAFTA
purposes. Denies that the merchandise is alternatively classifiable under Subheading 2105.00.50.
WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests that judgment be entered dismissing this
43
action, overruling plaintiffs claims, sustaining the decisions of the appropriate Customs officials,
and granting defendant such other and further rcl/cf as may bc just and appropriate.
Dated: April 25, 2002
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT D. McCALLUM, JR.
Assistant Attorney General
International Trade Field Office
SAUL DAVISSenior Trial Counsel
Dept. of Justice, Civil DivisionCommercial Litigation Branch26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Attorneys for Defendant
Tel. No. (212) 264-9230 or 3584
44
CERTIFJ_.CATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL
SAUL DAVIS certifies that I am a trial attorney in the office of the Assistant Attorney
General, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, International Trade Field Office, with
offices located at 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, and that on April 25, 2002, on behalf
of the United States, defendant(s) herein, I caused the annexed answer to be served upon:
John M. Peterson, Esq.
Curtis W. Knauss, Esq.Neville, Peterson & Williams80 Broad St.
New York, N.Y. 10004
the attorneys for the plaintiff(s) herein by the deposit of a copy thereof in a United States mail
receptacle, properly enclosed in a securely closed envelope, duly franked or postage prepaid,
addressed to said attorney(s) as above indicated.
45
_7-.7" :.....:. : ,':'.vl..___'D
Z6'_Zt._., 25 P l;" 07
,.L.'
•-_ ._,'" . •q ..J.. ...... ,',
/,, " l :i
a_" - _/ ,"_.',,7'I "_ I _"
• . _ ---'t",i ' ": "' ":" '_; " -'_
46
III. RELEVANT STATUTES
HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES
GENERAL RULES OF INTERPRETATION
3. When, by application of rule 2(b) or for any other
reason, goods are, prima facie, classifiable under two or
more headings, classification shall be effected asfollows:
(b) Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different
materials or made up of different components, and goods
put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot be classified
by reference to 3(a), shall be classified as if they
consisted of the material or component which gives them
their essential character, insofar as this criterion is
applicable.
(c) When goods cannot be classified by reference to
3(a) or 3(b), they shall be classified under the heading
which occurs last in numerical order among those which
equally merit consideration.
Notes:
HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES
CHAPTER 4
1. The expression "milk" means full cream milk or
partially or completely skimmed milk.
Additional U.S. Notes:
I. For the purposes of this schedule, the term "dairy
products described in additional U.S. note 1 to chapter 4"
47
means any of the following goods: malted milk, andarticles of milk or cream (except (a) white chocolate and(b) inedible dried milk powders certified to be used forcalibrating infrared milk analyzers); articles containingover 5.5 percent by weight of butterfat which are suitablefor useas ingredients in the commercial production ofedible articles (except articles within the scope of otherimport quotas provided for in additional U.S. notes 2 and3 to chapter 18); or, dried milk, whey or buttermilk (ofthe type provided for in subheadings 0402.10, 0402.21,0403.90 or 0404.10) which contains not over 5.5 percentby weight of butterfat and which is mixed with otheringredients, including but not limited to sugar, if suchmixtures contain over 16 percent milk solids by weight,are capable of being further processedor mixed withsimilar or other ingredients and are not prepared formarketing to the ultimate consumer in the identical formand package in which imported.
10. The aggregate quantity of dairy products describedin additional U.S. note 1to chapter 4, entered undersubheadings 0402.29.10, 0402.99.70, 0403.10.10,0403.90.90, 0404.10.11, 0404.90.30, 0405.20.60,1517.90.50, 1704.90.54,1806.90.05, 1901.10.35,1901.20.45, 1901.90.42,
1806.20.81,1806.32.60,1901.10.80,1901.20.05,1901.90.46,2105.00.30,
2106.90.06, 2106.90.64, 2106.90.85 and 2202.90.24 inany calendar year shall not exceed 3,665,000 kilograms(articles the product of Mexico shall not be permitted orincluded under the aforementioned quantitativelimitation and no such articles shall be classifiable
therein).
Of the quantitative limitations provided for in this note,Australia shall have accessto a quantity of not less than1,016,046 kilograms, and Belgium and Denmark
48
(aggregated)shall have accessto a quantity of not lessthan 154,221kilograms.
2105
HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES
CHAPTER 21
Ice cream and other edible ice, whether or not containing
cocoa:
1¢ _1, ¢¢
2105.00.30
2105.00.40
2105.00.50
Other [than ice cream]:
Dairy products described in
additional U.S. note 1 to
chapter 4:
Described in additional U.S. Note 10
to Chapter 4 and entered pursuant to
its provisions ...20%
Other .... 51.7¢+17.5%
Other ... 17.5%
Free (A+,CA,E,IL,J,MX)
HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES
CHAPTER 4
0403 Buttermilk, curdled milk and cream, yogurt, kephir and other
fermented or acidified milk and cream, whether or not
concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening
matter or flavored or containing added fruit, nuts or cocoa:
49
0403.10
0403.10.05
0403.10.10
0403.10.50
0403.10.90
Yogurt:In dry form:
Described in general note 15of thetariffschedule and entered pursuant to itsprovisions ........................... 20%
Free (A+,CA,E,IL, 20% J,MX)
Described in additional U.S. note 10
to this chapter and entered pursuant toits provisions ........................... 20%
Free (A+,CA,E,IL, 20% J)
Other............................ $1.065/kg +See9906.04.32- $1.217/kg +17.5% 9906.04.34 (MX) 20%
Other....................................17.5%Free (A+,CA,E,IL, 20% J,MX)
50
I
2 A
3 Q
is thatcorrect?
Yes, those products are distinguished.
And which is also the same for -- well, I
4 should say isn't it true that the tar/ff distinguishes
.5 between milk or -- I'm sorry -- whole or skim milk
6 from yogurt.
7 Is that correct?
8 A The tariff distinguishes between whole or
9 skim milk --
lO Q From--
I 1 A --and fermented milk --
12 Q And yogurt.
13 A -- and yogurt. Yes, they're provided for
14 under different headings.
15 Q Do you happen to know how acidified milk is
16 produced?
?7 A I would have to say no.
l g Q Okay. Do you happen to know how fermented
19 milk is produced?
20 A Yes.
21 0 Couldyou describethatforme?
22 A Generally, the milk that's going to Ix_
23 fermented is pasteurized, and the pasteurized milk
24 product then is inoculated with lactobacilli. The
25 lactobacilli ferment the milk.
5]
I whole incident occurred.
2 Q Okay. And, would this identify -- would
3 these documents identify who were the vendors for the
4 particular--
5 A And, since they're invoices--
6 Q -- products at that time?
7 A -- from the vendors, they mention
8 specifically what the ingredient was, and the name of
9 the vendor.
IO Q Do you know where the dairy components --
11 the dairy ingredients that went into the sorbet/yogurt
12 bar, were sourced? l believe you testified there was
13 the skim milk, and then there was the reduced-lactose
14 milk components.
15 Do you know where those were sourced?
16 A Those were from Parmalat Dairy, which is
17 kind of next-door. And, --
18 Q Next -- next door to --
19 A -- this -- this manufacturing site is in
20 London, Ontario, Canada.
21 Q Okay.
22 A So, the dairy was also in London, Ontario,
23 Canada.
24 Q Okay. Do you know whether, in 1999,
25 Pillsbury bought dairy components to make this product
52
1 from any source other than Parmalat?
2 A Haagen-Dazs only uses fresh, which means not
3 dried, not concentrated, not, you know -- dairy
4 components. So -- and, you have to use them quickly?
5 So, if they were made in Canada, the dairy had to have
6 come from Canada.
7 Q The -- okay. And, the dairy would be -- in
8 other words, when you say the dairy came from Canada,
9 you mean it was produced in Canada? Is that what your
l0 testimony is?
I I A It was surely pasteurized there. I assumed
12 that the herds were, actually, also in Canada.
13 Q Okay.
14 (Pause)
15 MR. PETERSON: Okay, at this time, Your
16 Honor, may I just have a moment to confer with my co-
l 7 counsel?
18 (Counsel conferring)
19 BY MR. PETERSON:
20 Q Okay, I'm sorry, Mr. Sweet. One more
21 question.
22 You testified earlier this morning that, in
23 producing the sorbet [sic] component of the product,
24 the cultured yogurt base was mixed with the reduced-
25 lactose milk component.
53
(Counsel conferring)
2 MR. PETERSON: Okay, again, with the Court's
3 permission, I'd like to approach the witness. We have
4 to do this part real early in the trial, Your Honor.
5 [Laughter]
6 MR. PETERSON: Forobvious reasons rclated
7 to the first law of thermodynamics.
8 BY MR. PETERSON:
9 Q I'd like to show you an item that is
10 designated as Plaintiffs Exhibit 2, and ask if you
11 can identify that, or what that item appears to be?
12 (Witness examining exhibit)
13 A This is a sorbet and yogurt bar, raspberry
14 and vanilla. It's in its current packaging. But, it
15 is essentially exactly the same bar that we've been
16 manufacturing for approximately ten years.
17 Q Okay. And, would that bar be, to your
18 knowledge, identical to the merchandise that was
19 imported in 1999. and that is the subject of this
20 case?
21
22
23
24
25
A Yes, sir.
Q Okay. Now, with respect to the
sorbet/yogun bars that the Plaintiffs imported during
1999, are you familiar with the range or the types of
sorbet/yogurt bar products that the Plaintiff imported
54
I during that year?
2 A I know we've manufactured many different
3 flavors in that year, I know there was also a
4 chocolate sorbetand yogurt bar.
5 Q Could you just describe for the Court what
6 the chocolate sorbet and yogurt bar consisted of?.
7 A It was very similar to this bar, except the
8 sorbet was a chocolate sorbct, instead of a raspberry
9 sorbet.
l0 Q Okay. Now, the Plaintiff is unable today to
11 produce a copy or to produce a sample of the chocolate
12 sorbet/yogurt bar.
13 Could you tell us, Mr. Sweet, whether that
14 bar is currently produced today.'?
15 A To my knowledge, that's not being produced
16 any more.
17 Q Okay. But, you testified that it's similar
t8 or identical to the bar but for the flavor of the
19 sorbct.
20 Is that correct?
21 A The ratios and everything are almost
22 identical.
23 MR. PETERSON: Okay. With the Court's
24 permission, I'd like to ask Mr. Sweet if he could open
25 the package -- well, l'd like to move Plaintiffs
55
I single pack. It has one bar inside. It's also sold
2 in a multi-pack, which is indicated in Mr. Davis's
3 photograph. There are several bars inside.
4 The single pack is primarily sold in
5 convenience stores. And, the multi-pack size, or with
6 multiple bars, is primarily sold in grocery stores.
7 Q I see. Thank you.
8 Now, Mr. Sweet, arc you familiar with the
9 way in which the sorbet/yogurt bar that you've
10 identified as Plaintiff's Exhibit 2 is manufactured?
11 A Oh, yes.
12 Q And, specifically, are you familiar with the
13 way in which the product is manufactured in Canada?
14 A Yes. I've seen that operation and developed
15 products for that operation.
16 Q And, are you familiar with the way that the
17 product was manufactured in Canada during 1999?
18 A Yes, sir.
19 Q Okay. Could you please describe for the
20 Court the way in which that product is manufactured?
21 A It's almost easier to start with how it's
22 put together. This bar is -- actually, this sorbet
23 mix is poured into a mold. That mold is embedded in a
24 very cold brine solution, so it freezes from the
25 outside in, similar to how you would imagine a
56
I Popsicle would be made. And, that's called
2 quiescently frozen.
3 And, as it's freezing from the outside in,
4 it gets to a certain point where we have enough frozen
5 to -- to reach the quantity we want ofsorbet. We put
6 a tube inside, and suck back out the un-frozen part,
7 and it leaves a cavity.
g And that, then, we take yogurt mix, freeze
9 that to a fairly runny consistency, but partially
l0 frozen, and put -- put that inside. It continues to
I I freeze.
12 As that freezes into the center, it gets
13 finn enough that it will, actually, hold the stick.
14 So, we insert the stick. It freezes a little bit more
15 solidly.
16 Then, it goes into a stage where the outside
17 is put into a warmer water, to help it release it. We
18 pull them out by the stick, dip it in this exterior
19 dip we call, basically, a water and juice solution.
20 That freezes on it just from the cold that the bar
21 was, itself, and then it's packaged.
22 Q Okay.
23 THE COURT: And, is this an assembly-line
24 process.'?
25 THE WITNESS: Oh, oh. yeah. There are
.57
1 several molds across,and they just index through.
2 The whole machine has several hundred molds in it.
3 BY MR. PETERSON:
4 Q So-- so, with respect to the portion of
5 Exhibit 2 that you've identified as -- as Plaintiff's
6 - that you've identified as Plaintiff's Exhibit 2,
7 the frozen sorbct portion is formed first, if I
8 understand your testimony correctly7
9 A Correct.
10 Q And, after that, yogurt is put into the --
I I into the frozen sorbet bar, as it were?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Now, you testified that during this process
14 of quiescent freezing, some of the frozen sorbct, or
15 the sorbet is removed from the bar.
16 A The un-frozen part, right.
17 Q Okay. Is there a name for that process that
18 is used in production?
19 A Well, when we remove the -- actually, the
20 official term is suck-back.
21 Q Now, what would happen in the production
22 process if you did not perform the suck-back
23 operation7
24 A You wouldn't have room -- you couldn't get
25 the yogurt in, and you would end up with just a sorbet
58
I in your own words for the Court?
2 A Yeah. Let me -- if l could take a little
3 time here, I'll point to some pages in -- in -- if
4 that would be helpful, Your Honor? Of where I'm
5 getting some of the numbers from?
6 THE COURT: If it's helpful to you.
7 THE WITNESS: Okay. I don't remember, to
8 six decimal places, all of this information.
9 THE COURT: We were on the description of
l0 the ice milk --
II THE WITNESS: Right.
12 THE COURT: -- portion of--
13 A (Continuing) The ice milk base is on Bates
14 Number 646, and it's a combination of a lactose-
15 reduced skim and condensed skim blend, some liquid
16 sugar, various forms of corn syrup, and water. That
17 is pasteurized and put into a tank.
18 The second component is what we call the
19 frozen yogurt base. The ingredients of that are
20 shown on Bates Number 636, or Page 6 of-- of this
21 document. It's a combination of condensed skim milk
22 and water. Those two ingredients are pasteurized, put
23 into a culturing or a fermentation tank, brought to
24 the appropriate temperature.
25 And then, the third ingredient here, which
59
I is the cultures, or the yogurt cultures, are added to
2 that, and then that's incubated for a sufficient
3 amount of time for the organisms to grow to the high
4 numbers.
5 Q Okay. Now, let me just -- I want to focus
6 for a minute on the component that's shown here in
7 Bates Number 636, which is part of Exhibit 4.
8 A Okay.
9 Q You've testified that you combine, 1
10 believe, skim milk and water, and then introduce
11 cultures into the mix.
12 A Yes.
13 Q Could you tell the Court what type of
14 cultures these are?
15 A I don't -- the organism names are longer
16 than what I can remember, but they're classic yogurt
17 cultures, the same ones that are required in most
18 identification documentation for yogurt.
19 Q Okay.
20 A They're -- lactic acid bacteria is the
21 general classification.
22 Q Okay. And, I believe you indicated that a
23 culture reaction or culturing process takes place,
24 once you introduce these cultures?
25 A Yeah. The organisms come in as, kind of,
60
I freeze-dried.
2 Q Okay.
3 A When we put them in there, in the right --
4 it's, like, body temperature, a hundred degrees
5 Fahrenheit, and with the milk, it starts to,
6 basically, eat part of the milk components, primarily
7 the lactose and the milk sugar, convening that to
8 lactic acid, and it's the acidity that makes yogurt
9 taste sour.
I0 Q Now, again, we're talking about the
I 1 component that's described here on Page 636.
12 Could you tell us how long this yogurt
13 reaction, or culturing reaction goes on?
14 A Actually, it -- let me check here. That's
15 actually a required part of the process. If it would
16 be too short or too long, it would indicate something
17 was going wrong.
18 So, the culturing -- (witness perusing
19 document) -- is on Bates Page 642, Step Number 26 and
20 27 -- oh, excuse me, Step Number 24, fermentation
21 time, eight to twelve hours.
22 Q Okay. And, directly above that line, on
23 Page 642, there's a statement ferment yogurt until
24 break titratable acidity is reached.
25 Do you see that statement, Mr. Sweet?
61
I A Yes.
2 Q Could you explain to the Court what that
3 statement means?
4 A We know when it's done, so to speak, when it
5 has an appropriate amount of acid in it. The way we
6 measure that is just a test method called titratable
7 acidity. It's a titration method.
8 Q And, what -- what, exactly, does titratable
9 acidity measure? What property of the producl does it
I0 measure?
I1 A It measures acidity, in general. But, in
12 this case, it -- it - it loosely correlates to kind
13 of the --
14 MR. DAVIS: Objection. Foundation.
15 MR. PETERSON: I need to get a read back.
16 THE COURT: Well, what's your objection, Mr.
17 Davis? He is--
18 MR. DAVIS: My objection is that --
19 THE COURT: - their research and
20 development --
21 MR. DAVIS: - that the-
22 TIlE COURT: -- or former research and
23 development manager.
24 MR. DAVIS: Yes, but my objection is, is
25 that he has not shown a background in science that
62
I
2
3
4
5
6 O
THE COURT: Okay. Your objection --
MR. DAVIS: -- 1 don't [inaudible]
THE COURT: -- is overruled.
MR. DAVIS: Okay.
BY MR. PETERSON:
Let me ask a couple of other questions
7 beforewe-- okay.
g Duringthecourseofyouremployment as
9 productqualitymanagerfortheHaagcn-Dazsbrand,
I0 haveyou hadoccasiontowork withthisconceptof
I I titratable acidity?
12 A I -- I have performed this test before, not
13 -- not as a quality manager, but certainly, in my
14 career with dairy products.
15 Q And, arc you familiar with the role of
16 titratable acidity, if any, in these types of
17 products?
18 A Yes.
19 Q Okay. And, again, referring you to Item 23
20 on Page 642, could you again explain for the Court --
21 I believe the answer was interrupted -- on wb.at the
22 statement means, ferment yogurt until break
23 titratablc acidity is reached ?
24 A Again, that's-- that's a measurement of the
25 amount of acid that's been produced. And, what we
63
I want to have happen is for the organisms to grow, as
2 -- or multiply. As theyYe multiplying, they're --
3 they're consuming the lactose, creating lactic acid,
4 and it tells us when we have the level of sourness or
5 acidity, and the level of organisms that we -- that we
6 want.
7 Q
8 A
Okay.
And, 1 -- specifically, can go to the
9 chemistry of the test, but I didn't think that's what
]0 you were asking.
11 Q Now, you testified that these organisms work
12 on the lactose in the milk.
13 A Yes.
14 Q Now, is -- is that a product known as --
15 when -- when there's a reference to culturing milk,
16 would this be the process that -- that occurs.'?
17 A Culturing or fermentation of milk is what is
18 the process that's occurring here, yes.
19 Q Are you familiar with the term acidified
20 milk ?
21 A I have heard the term. I've read a little
22 bit about it. Yeah.
23 Q Okay.
24 A Yes.
25 Q The product that is produced as a result of
64
l A Correct.
2 Q What happens to the acidity, or what happens
3 to the -- to those cultures, when you blend these
4 products together? And, by -- when I say blending
5 together, I'm referring to the yogurt base and the
6 ice milk base.
7 A Yeah. One piece 1 didn't mention is the
8 yogurt, after it reaches the level of fitratable
9 acidity, and the organisms have grown, now it's
l0 cooled. If it's cooled below forty-five, fifty
11 degrees below that, then the organisms stop growing.
12 So, we kind of lock them there.
13 But, if you would warm them up again, they
14 would start growing again, like in your intestines, or
15 some place like that.
16 In this case, the organisms are active, but
17 they're not growing. When they're blended into what
18 we call the ice milk base, they're equally distributed
19 throughout the whole thing, and become an integral
20 part, then, of that total mix.
21 Q Okay. So, then, the total mix, doesthe
22 total mix have a property oftitratable acidity?
23 A The blended yogurt mix -- well, all milk has
24 titratable acidity. This has a higher titratable
25 acidity than it would have if we hadn't added the
65
1 THE COURT: I'm sorry, Mr. Peterson.
2 MR. PETERSON: I'm -- I'm sorry, l just
3 want to re-phrase it for the witness, mainly for
4 myself, I think, but --
5 [Laughter]
6 BY MR. PETERSON:
7 Q Now, you testified, when the yogurt or the
8 cultured component, the yogurt base, is blended with
9 the ice milk base, --
10 A Yes.
I I Q -- that the resulting blended product had a
12 certain titratable acidity.
13 A Yes.
14 Q Now, could you -- are there any statements
15 you could make regarding what that level oftitratable
16 acidity is, compared to whole milk, or to regular skim
17 milk?
18 A It's -- it's higher than whole milk, or
19 regular skim milk. Obviously, you're adding acid to
20 what was skim milk. It's a property that we very
21 tightly control, because that -- that tells us what
22 the flavor properties and the acidity and things like
23 that are.
24 THE COURT: Does the reduction ofthc
25 lactose in the filtering affect that acidity? Is that
66
l
2
3
4
5
6 Q
previously marked for
identification as Plaintiff's
Exhibit No. I, was admitted into
evidence.)
BY MR. PETERSON:
Okay. Now, Mr. Sweet, are you familiar -- I
7 think I asked this -- with the merchandise that's the
8 subject ofthislawsuit?
9 A Yes, I am.
10 Q And, could you describe for the Court what
II that merchandise is?
12 A It's a -- a novelty -- an ice cream novelty.
13 Those are kind of-- we just basically call it a
14 stick bar. It's a frozen dessert novelty. It has
15 sorbet on the outside, and a fat-free frozen yogurt in
16 the center.
17 Q Okay.
18 (Counsel conferring)
19 MR. PETERSON: My colleague, Mr. Knauss, is
20 now taking Exhibit 2 out of a bag. And, this bag,
21 actually, has been to court before.
22 [Laughter]
23 MR. PETERSON: It was used for demonstration
24 work in the case of Dolly, Incorporated versus United
25 States a couple of months ago.
67
1 petri dish, and so forth.
2 Depending upon the media used, the ranges
3 were ten to the sixth, ten to the seventh organisms.
4 And then, they incubated for four hours and -- and did
5 the plating again. And, essentially, they looked like
6 they all went up one log cycle, but the test was done
7 at four months, instead of expiration date, which I
8 believe Mr. Sweet said was one year.
9 (Pause)
10 BY MR. DAVIS:
I I Q Based upon your review of the development,
12 production, processing, and marketing materials
13 provided by Haagen-Dazs, do you have an opinion
14 regarding which component provides the essential
15 character of these dessert bases?
16 A Yes, I do.
17 Q What is your opinion?
18 A It's the frozen yogurt that supplies the
19 essential character.
20 Q And, what are the bases for your opinion7
21 A Well, it has the highest concentration of
22 solids. Therefore, it's in predominance, from a
23 solids basis, in that yogurt.
24 Q Why do you consider the solids comparison to
25 be critical?
68
I THE COURT: All right. Then, well let you
2 go through your direct, and then break for lunch.
3 MR. PETERSON: Okay.
4 THE COURT: And then, do cross after lunch.
5 For some reason, the Court just has this urge to go
6 out and have a big dish of chocolate and raspberry
7 yogurt.
8 [Laughter]
9 MR. PETERSON: We can recommend a very good
I0 brand, Your Honor.
I I [Laughter]
12 BY MR. PETERSON:
13 Q Could you go into the formula-in column, and
14 identify for the Court those components of the
15 raspberry/vanilla sorbet/yogurt bar which are milk or
16 made from milk?
17 A It's identical to the chocolate sorbet and
18 yogurt bar. They're not all exactly in the same
19 place, but one is the condensed skim milk, eight-
20 point-two four percent. And, at the bottom, the same
21 LR-skim, at thirteen-point-one nine.
22 Q Okay. And, could you again show us in the
23 formula-out column which components of the bar are
24 milk or are dairy products?
25 A Certainly. The third one, which is the LR-
69
l skim condensed skim blend. And, the skim milk
2 condensed, which is the sixth one down.
3 Q Okay. Now, if you could look at Plaintiffs
4 Exhibit 3, is there contained in there the formula for
5 the raspberry yogurt -- the raspberry sorbet -- I
6 apologize -- that is included in the bar?
7 A Just the sorbet mix formula?
8 Q The sorbet mix formula.
9 A Yeah. That, actually, is in the part with
I0 the Bates numbers. I mean, it's embedded in here, but
I I it's toughto pull out, but the totaJ-- Ihc total --
12 Q Okay.
13 (Witness perusing document)
14 A This was made a little bit differently than
15 the -- the chocolate one? The chocolate one, you can
16 put the cocoa and everything through the
17 pasteurization. But, you don't want to add that heat
18 to the raspberry. So, we put it together in two
19 places.
20 One is Bates Number 1274, which is corn
21 syrup, water, liquid sugar, and pectin.
22 (Witness perusing document)
23 A And, that shows on Bales Page )281, where we
24 take that, what we call the un-flavored sorbet base
25 here, that I mentioned before, combine that with lemon
70
I juice and raspberry puree.
2 Q Okay. And, the ingredient that you've
3 called the un-flavored raspberry sorbet base, is the
4 item that was shown on Bates Page 1274?
5 A Correct.
6 Q Okay. Now, referring to the formula for the
7 raspberry sorbet shown on Bates Page 1281, is there
8 any -- is there any dairy content in that formula?
9 A No.
10 Q Okay.
I I (Pause)
12 Q Now, Mr. --
13 THE COURT: Just as -- while you're looking,
14 Mr. Pete=son, just as an absolutely irrelevant
15 parenthetical by the Court, and a commentary on
16 society, it's interesting that I notice just today,
17 looking through here, that somewhere in your testing,
18 you found that people don't like it when it has too
19 much fruit in it.
20 MR. PETERSON: Well,--
21 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
22 [Laughter]
23 THE WITNESS: Yeah. It's a long story.
24 MR. PETERSON: We are happy to discuss that
25 -- that very subject now, Your Honor.
71
I
2
3 Q
MR. PETERSON: Yes.
BY MR. PETERSON:
Is there anything done to the skim milk
17
18
19
20
21 Q
22 milk ?
23 A
24 Q
4 components of the frozen yogurt during the processing,
5 that would change their characteristics as skim milk,
6 and transform them into something else?
7 A Some of the condensed skim milk is used in
8 the yogurt base, itself, that actually gets chemically
9 modified through fermentation, and the lactose is
10 convened to lactic acid.
I I There is the lactose-reduce process, but
12 that's as we purchase it. That doesn't - that does
13 not occur during the process.
14 There is also some skim milk in -- in the
15 ice milk base. That ispretty much intact. When you
16 add the acid and the culture to it, however, it
becomes so integrated, you can't really separate out
what was the skim milk and what was the fermented skim
milk. It's all kind of insidious, throughout the
whole thing.
Now, you used the term fermented skim
Yeah.
Is fermented skim milk recognized in
25 commerce or industry as something other than skim
72
l percent milk solids not fat.
2 Q Okay. Now, with reference to the frozen
3 yogurt component of the sorbet/yogurt bar that you'Ve
4 testified you're familiar with, my next question to
5 you is, in your understanding, is that sorbet/yogurt
6 bar or sorbet -- I_ sorry. Is that frozen yogurt
7 component of the sorbet/yogurt bar whole milk?
8 A No, it is not.
9 Q Okay. And, do you have an understanding of
10 what the term skim milk means, as it's used in
I1 commerce and industry in the United States?
12 A Yes.
13 Q And, could you tell the Court what your
14 understanding of that term is?
15 A Again, there is a C.F.R. standard of
16 identity, and that reads that it -- that skim milk
17 contains not more than a half-percent fat, and not
18 less than eight and a quarter percent milk solids not
19 fat, if memory serves me correctly on the latter.
20 Q Okay. And, again, with reference to the
21 frozen yogurt component of the sorbet/yogurt bar
22 that's at issue in this case, would you consider that
23 frozen yogurt component to be skim milk?
24 A No, sir.
25 Q Okay. Now, within common understanding of
73
I known as full cream milk in United States industry and
2 commerce?
3 A No.
4 THE COURT: When you said sorbet/yogun, do
5 you mean frozen yogurt?
6 Q I mean -- I'm sorry. The frozen yogurt
7 component. Is that frozen yogurt component, as it
appears in the bar, a product that is known in
9 industry as full cream milk?
IO A It's -- it's more than that. No, it'snot
11 milk.
12 Q Okay. Could you tell me what the difference
13 is between the frozen yogurt that appears in this bar
14 and full cream milk? What are the differences?
15 A One, it's fat-free. So, it's not whole
16 cream.
17 Second, it has an organism level and a
18 titratabl¢ acidity which would not be -- normally, you
19 know, would not be considered part of just full cream
20 milk.
21 Q Are there any other ways that this sorbet --
22 that the imported frozen yogurt differs from full
23 cream milk?
24 A Well, the milk is usually not sweetened.
25 Flavored whole milks would be, but the sugars and the
74
1 Q Okay. Now, you've testified as to the way
2 in which the frozen yogurt component of this product
3 is manufactured.
4 Can you tell the Court whether any whole
5 cream milk is used in manufacturing the frozen yogurt
6 component of the bar?
7 A There is no whole cream milk in this
8 product.
9 Q And, can you tell the Court whether there is
10 any skim milk used in production of the yogurt
I I component of the imported bar?
12 A There is a condensed skim milk, and a
13 lactose-reduced skim milk used in this bar.
14 Q And, you testified that the reduced-fat skim
15 milk is processed prior to being put in the form of
16 the frozen yogurt, correct?
_7 A Say that one more time7
18 Q You -- you testified earlier this morning as
19 to the processes that are performed, for example, to
20 the yogurt base, and to the ice milk base, in order to
21 make frozen yogurt. -_
22 THE COURT: Mr. Peterson, I'm going to let
23 you build to something, if you need to, but try to
24 avoid being repetitive of what he's already testified
25 to, all right?
75
I flavor, it would not be just milk.
2 Q Okay. Now, are you familiar with the term
3 skimmed milk, as it is used, or skim milk, as that
4 term is used in United States commerce and industry?
5 A Yes.
6 Q And, could you tell the Court what that term
7 means?
8 A Skim milk, skimmed milk, non-fat milk, fat-
9 free milk are all the same thing. That's where you
10 take whole milk, or full cream milk, and by
I I centrifugation, remove the cream from that. What's
12 left over is the fat-removed milk, or the skimmed
13 milk.
14 O Okay. Now, is the frozen yogurt portion of
15 the imported merchandise a product that is known or
16 recognized in United States commerce or industry as
17 skim orskimmed milk?
18 A It is not skim milk, no.
19 Q And, could you explain for the Court why the
20 frozen yogurt is not skim milk?
21 A Similar to why it's not full cream milk,
22 because it has an organism level which would not be
23 typical of, you know, consumable milk, an acidity
24 which would not make it skim milk, and the sweeteners
25 and flavors.
76
I
2
3 Q
THE WITNESS: Is that okay?
BY MR. PETERSON:
Okay. Now, are you familiar -- are you
4 familiar with the product known as yogurt ? Just
5 generically.
Yes, yes.
And, could you tell the Courl what yogurt
6 A
7 Q
8 is?
9 A Yogurt is cow's milk that has been cultured,
10 fermented, similar to the process that we're talking
I I here, with specific organisms. They're in the lactic
12 acid bacteria family. Again, similar to what we're --
13 what we_'e using herc.
14 As I've been looking into that recently, it
15 -- there is -- there are minimum titratab|e acidity
16 requirements. There are minimum requirements of how
17 that's all cultured, before it's consumed.
18 Oftentimes, fruit or sugar or something,
19 then is added to that later, before it's eaten.
20 Q Okay. Now, you testified earlier that the
21 white portion at the center oftbe imported
22 merchandise is something that is known as frozen
23 yogurt.
24 Is that correct?
25 A Yes.
77
I industry and commerce in the United States, is yogurt
2 understood to be a different product from whole milk?
3 A Yes.
4 Q Is it understood also to be a different
5 product than skim milk?
6 A Yes.
7 Q Within industry in the United States, does
8 the term cultured milk refer to a different product
9 than whole milk?
10 A Not necessarily.
II Q What about skim milk?
12 A Not necessarily.
13 Q And, in what sense could an -- or could a
14 cultured milk be a whole milk or a skim milk?
15 A Either one of those could be the starting
16 material for making a cultured milk.
17 Q You mean whole milk or skim milk could be
18 the starting point for making a cultured milk.
19 Is that your testimony?
20 A Correct.
21 Q Okay.
22 THE COURT: Ifl can just ask, so I can
23 understand it, and I don't know what the importance of
24 this is, but I want to understand it. You start with
25 whole milk to get a cultured milk, but when you finish
78
16
17
18
19
1 flavoring element made with condensed skim independent
2 from the blend of-- of lactose-reduced skim milk and
3 condensed skim.
4 Q Now, can you get condensed skim milk or
5 lactose-reduced skim milk, or the blend, without
6 having whole milk someplace down the line, as a
7 starting point?
8 A No.
9 Q Would the same be true with a fully cultured
10 yogurt? Somewhere down the line, you have to have
I I whole milk to make that fully cultured yogurt.
12 A Yes, sir. Your starting point is going to
13 be a raw milk, which -- which is -- well, ifit's got
14 more than three and a half percent fat, then it --
15 then, it fulfills the definition for whole milk.
(Pause)
THE COURT: Does raw milk ever fall below
that?
THE WITNESS: Yes. In fact, in the standard
20 of identity allowed by the State of Wisconsin, raw
21 milk can be as low as three percent. But, the -- the
22 federal standard is -- is three and a quarter.
23 We had -- several years ago, we -- three,
24 four years ago, we had a drought in Wisconsin, and we
25 had very poor feed for the dairy cattle as an end
79
I in this -- in this case, in an amended complaint. It
2 wasn't, therefore, before the Agency when they made
3 their ruling.
4 If you have competition between Chapter --
5 Chapter 4, the yogurt provision, 0403, and 2105, based
6 upon what you've testified to today, where would you
7 classify that merchandise?
8 A In 2105.
9 MR. DAVIS: All right. I have no further
10 questions, Your Honor.
I 1 (Pause)
12 MR. KNAUSS: May it please the Court: My
13 name is Curtis Knauss, also representing The Pillsbury
14 Company, the Plaintiffin this matter. Let me say,
15 it's good to get up here, once and for all.
16 CROSS-EXAMINATION
17 BY MR. KNAUSS:
18 Q Mr. Brady, good morning.
19 A Good morning.
20 Q Good to see you again.
21 Customs has a mandate to classify goods in
22 the condition as their imported.
23 Is that correct?
24 A Yes, that's correct.
25 Q Isn't -- isn't it true that, under the
80
I Q And, do you happen to know how yogurt is
2 produced?
3 A Yogurt is a fermented milk. It's -- in the
4 manufacturing process, the milk is pasteurized. Then,
5 it's inoculated with -- with the two characterizing
6 bacteria. The fermentation process proceeds, and -°
7 and the product is -- comes into being.
8 Q So, isn't it true that -- that all dairy
9 products start as whole or skim milk?
10 A I would say all dairy products probably
II start as whole milk, because that's what comes from
12 tbe cow.
13 Q Once -- once milk or skim milk is acidified
14 or fermented, as you've described, can it then be
15 called an article ofmilk ?
16 (Pause)
17 A I think, at that point, its identity is
18 simply fermented milk or acidified milk. 1_ not
19 quite sure how to -- how to understand your question.
20 Yogurt is a fermented milk. It might be
21 characterized an article ofmilk, since it's a
22 commercial product.
23 Q Once a milk is fermented or acidified, can
24 it -- can it be restored to its original status?
25 A I don't believe so.
81
I establish that this particular product is yogurt or
2 not, for tariff purposes, in its imported condition,
3 it's in the form of a frozen dessert product. And,
4 the explanatory note directs that when you're
5 comparing those two products, go to Chapter 21. That
6 takes precedence. So, to that extent, I can be a
7 little bit disinterested. I don't feel that it's an
8 issue.
9 l think what we have is -- is a product
l0 that's known in commerce and industry as yogurt, and
I I that's the product that's defined in the C.F.R.
12 standards. And then, there's a distinct product,
13 called frozen yogurt. And that, in essence, is a
14 confection or frozen dessert-type product. And,
15 that's perceived by the industry as a different type
16 product.
17 It's made -- it's made differently. Not
18 only is the -
19 THE COURT: Well, from what I had gotten
20 from Professor Bradley, it's made two -- one -- frozen
21 yogurt is made in one of two different ways.
22 THE WITNESS: Yes, that's right. I just
23 think it's not -- the yogurt, itself, is more or less
24 the material. It's a fermented milk.
25 So, what we have, the alternatives that were
82
I
2 A
3 Q
4 A
5 Q
forty Fahrenheit -- minus forty Fahrenheit, --
Urn bmm.
-- and as cold as minus fifty Fahrenheit.
Okay.
Now, given your typical table speeds,
6 wouldn_ that mean that you can have a permissible
7 variation of shell thickness because of these variable
g speeds?
9 In other words, you could have one
10 production run where the temperature of the brine is
1! forty-five degrees, another one where it's minus
12 forty, and another one where it's minus fifty.
13 Wouldn't that affect the thickness of the shell?
14 A If you allowed the brine temperature to
15 control the sorbet thickness, that would be true. Wc
16 do it the other way around. We measure the thickness
17 to adjust the brine temperature.
18 So, this allows enough variation so that we
19 can manipulate it to get the right thickness.
20 Q When do you measure the shell?
21 A As it's coming off the ver_ end, after we
22 extract it from the mold.
23 Q You will have already produced the completed
24 frozen yogurt bar at that point.
25 Is that --
83
I (Pause)
2 THE COURT: You don't even need to answer
3 that. It'sjust idle curiosity.
4 THE WITNESS: I'm not -- ] don1 know. I
5 could be made to believe it, but I don't know.
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 BY MR. PETERSON:
8 Q Previously, you testified, I believe, that
9 -- that Haagen-Dazs today continues to make raspberry
10 sorbet/yogurt bars.
I ! Is that con'¢_?
12 A Yes. Raspberry sorbet and yogurt, yes.
13 Q Now, the other product involved in this case
14 is a chocolate sorbeVvanilla yogurt bar.
15 To your knowledge, does Haagen-Dazs still
16 manufacture that bar?
17 A No, that's no longer being manufactured.
18 Q And, do you know why that is?
19 A The only difference in the bar was the
20 flavor ofsorbet, so I assume it's -- that was just
21 not a combination that worked.
22 Q Okay. Now, Mr. -- Mr. Sweet, in your
23 position as product quality manager, do you have
24 occasion to become involved in determining what
25 ingredients are to be used in a sorbet/yogurt bar?
84
2
3
4
5
6 0
THE COURT: Lay a foundation for his --
MR. PETERSON: Okay.
THE COURT: -- his examination of the fact.
MR. PETERSON: Okay.
BY MR. PETERSON:
In manufacturing the imported merchandise,
7 does the Plaintiffattempt to comply with these
8 criteria that you've identified in Plaintiff's
9 Exhibit 7?
10 A We certainly attempt to. We've done more
11 thanthat.
12 Q Okay. Could you describe for the Court what
13 you've done?
14 A When you -- you send in a request or I don't
15 now exactly what it's called, to the National Yogurt
16 Association, to ask for their permission to use their
17 logo on our packaging, which we do -- we do use, you
18 have to submit some information.
19 One is -- and, again, it's -- it's in here,
20 too, what you do, but you have to test your product
21 for the live and active cultures, make sure it meets
22 the ten to the seventh. We do that whenever we start
23 up new production, or a new flavor, to confirm it
24 meets those criteria. We rely on the time and
25 temperature, and the fact that it develops this
85
I product.
2 Q Okay. So, in other words, in order to meet
3 the National Yogurt Association standard, the product
4 has to have ten million grams?
5 A Ten million--
6 Q Or ten million organisms?
7 A -- in each gram.
8 Q Okay. Now, to your knowledge, does the
9 Plaintifftest its yogurt formula for the
10 sorbet/yogun bar at issue here to determine wbether
1] it meets that ten to the seventh requirement?
! 2 A We do not test every batch. But, we test
13 the process. And, when we get the certification, we
14 submit that data, showing that we've tested several
15 different lots and they all have met that minimum
16 standard or higher.
17 MR. PETERSON: With the Court's permission,
18 I'd like to show the witness Plaintiff's Exhibit
19 Number 8 for identification, and ask him -
20
21
22
23
24
25
THE COURT: Surely.
MR. PETERSON: -- if he recognizes it?
(Witness perusing document)
BY MR. PETERSON:
Mr. Sweet, could --
Yes, I recognize this.
86
I
2
3
4 q
THE WITNESS: Yes.
THE COURT: Um hmm.
BY MR. PETERSON:
Okay. Now, to your knowledge -- well, let's
5 go to the first page of this exhibit, and do you see a
6 paragraph where the word text appears above the
7 paragraph?
8 A Yes.
9 Q Could you just read into the record the
10 first sentence that appears under that, starting with
I 1 the word background ?
12 A Certainly. Background. This test is done
13 to be sure that the Haagen-Dazs fat-free frozen yogurt
14 is fermented with both L. delbrueckii sub--species
15 bulgaricus and S. thermophilus, and has at least ten
16 to the seventh CFU per gram.
17 Q So, to your knowledge, would this be a test
18 done to determine compliance with the NYA requirements
19 for frozen yogurt?
20 A That is why it was done. In fact, near the
21 top of this, the objective is just that, to make -- to
22 -- to test this to assure it meets those criteria.
23 Q Okay. And, if I could just ask you to scan
24 through this first document, is there a test result
25 reported for the -- the products that are the subject
87
1
2 A
3 Q
4 A
point-one-five to point-one-eight?
What do I base them on?
Yes.
This is -- this is common knowledge in the
5 industry, and a very notable textbook by Hugo Sommer,
6 S-O-M-M-E-R, illustrates that very, very well.
7 Q Now, taking into account the apparcnt
8 acidity ofthe milk products, the basic milk products,
9 in your opinion, has Pillsbury shown that the
10 fermentation process of-- l_n sorry, that point-
11 fifteen percent of the total acidity was, in fact,
12 obtained by fermentation, rather than by apparent
13 acidity?
14 A Well, we've - we've seen no quality
15 assurance documentation. If- if they were going to
16 prove that point-one-five percent were a part of their
17 finished product, they would have had to do an initial
18 titration before the culture was added -- excuse me.
19 They would have had to do an ifiitial titration on the
20 ice milk base, as they call it, and then they would
21 have to do a final titration on the flavor
22 concentrate, and a final titration on the finished
23 blended frozen yogurt mix.
24 Q Their standards state that they are looking
25 for point-three percent to point-four percent
88
I titratable acidity in the final product.
2 Is that correct?
3 A That's correct.
4 Q Given the apparent acidity that's present in
5 dairy product -- in milk products, would that -- they
6 achieved point-three percent titratable acidity.
7 Would they have, in fact, obtained at least point-
8 fifteen percent of total acidity by fermentation?
9 A From -- from my calculations, and I've got
10 them written over there, but I think I can do it from
I 1 memory, the titratable acidity in their product, from
12 the apparent acidity viewpoint, varies between point-
13 two and point-two-five, depending upon whether you use
14 point-one-five or point-one-eight as your reference to
15 apparent acidity.
16 And, consequently, if you use -- if you used
17 point-two-five, for example, that exceeds their limit
18 ofpoint-four on titration. They -- in their
19 specifications, they want the finished product, ifl
20 recall correctly, to be between point-three and point-
21 four titratable acidity.
22 If-- if you use point-one-eight to develop
23 the apparent acidity calculation, based on the milk
24 products that are in there, you will determine that
25 that apparent acidity is point-two-five. And then,
89
I Haagen-Dazs marketed these dessert bars?
2 A I heard from Brian Sweet the way they
3 marketed it today, yes.
4 Q And, have you examined their packaging, a
5 variety of their packaging, also?
6 A I have seen Xerox copies of their packaging
7 materials, and then the exhibit that was given today,
8 also the -- a similar exhibit at deposition.
9 Q Based upon your review of the production and
10 processing materials, do you have an opinion whether
I 1 the frozen yogurt core is yogurt?
12 A Yes, l have.
13 Q What is your opinion?
14 A In -- in my expert report, I stated that all
15 of the milk constituents must be fermented in order to
16 call it yogurt.
17 Q Why is that necessary?
18 A This has been a fact of long standing with
19 the industry, in spite of the fact that other -- other
20 methods of manufacture are used in making frozen
21 yogurt, or another method is used in the manufacture
22 of frozen yogurt.
23 Q Was this also one of the requirements of the
24 National Yogurt Association, for yogurt and frozen
25 yogurt?
90
I A The National Yogurt Association does require
2 that all milk solids be fermented. However, ifl'm
3 allowed to continue?
4 Q Please.
5 A However, I had the opinion, from industry
6 practices, prior to the nineties, roughly, that frozen
7 yogurt must be made from -- or frozen yogurt requires
8 that all of the mil,k solids be fermented. And, it's
9 only been since Plaintiff's counsel produced the
10 National Yogurt Association bulletin off the website
I 1 that I learned that they also require that all of the
12 milk solids be fermented.
13 MR. DAVIS: If[ may have a moment, Your
14 Honor?
15 (Pause)
16 THE COURT: Well, while you're doing that, I
17 want to ask a question.
18 At the beginning of your testimony, 1
19 remember you talked about frozen product that was made
20 from a mixture, and I -- I asked you what you called
21 that, and you said frozen yogurt.
22 THE WITNESS: Yes.
23 THE COURT: Was that --
24 THE WITNESS: In -- in class?
25 THE COURT: Um hmm.
91
1 THE WITNESS: Yes.
2 THE COURT: Was that one in which all the
3 milk solids were fermented?
4 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.
5 THE COURT: Okay.
6 THE WITNESS: I've made it both ways, and --
7 and I have -- I started off, initially, making it only
8 with the milk solids fermented, the entire lot of milk
9 solids fermented. And then, I made it both ways,
10 subsequently, at the end of my tenure at the
I I University.
12 THE COURT: And, in -- in both ways, did you
13 still call it frozen yogurt, or--
14 THE WITNESS: For want of a better title,
15 yes. But, I explained to the students exactly what
16 was -- what industry practices were, and -- and what
17 industry -- industry's former practices were.
18 THE COURT: Um hmm.
19 THE WITNESS: The -- the easiest way to make
20 a frozen yogurt, Your Honor, is the way that
21 Haagen-Dazs is making it right now. It's the easiest
22 way to control that finished product. If you have to
23 ferment all of the milk solids, you need to -- you
24 need to have good control. Otherwise -- and -- and
25 monitoring. Otherwise, you may have greater acidity
92
I than you want.
2 THE COURT: Um hmm.
3 THE WITNESS: And so, there's an obvious
4 need then to dilute. And, to minimize that
5 responsibility, 1 guess you could call it, to
6 industry, you make a base and you add this flavored
7 concentrate, is what 1call it, the highly fermented
8 yogurt mixture, you add that to the base that you've
9 prepared and call it frozen yogurt.
10 However, by national yogurt standard, and my
11 former position, 1guess my first position, on the
12 manufacture of frozen yogurt, the -- you escape the
13 requirement of all solids being fermented.
14 THE COURT: Other than Haagen-Dazs, do other
15 companies do that?
16 THE WITNESS: Yes, they do.
17 THE COURT: Do a lot of them?
18 (Pause)
19 THE WITNESS: 1 cannot tell you. I cannot
20 tell you, because I have not been privy to what they
21 do in other manufacturing sites.
22 THE COURT: Do you have any idea what the
23 industry standard is? I mean, just practice -- by
24 practice, and not by --
25 THE WITNESS: Industry standard is
93
I simplicity and ease of control. They dont hire PhDs
2 in dairy science or food science to come in and run
3 their program for them.
4 THE COURT: So -- so, what you seem to be
5 telling me is there would be a bias, if you will,
6 towards doing it the way Haagen-Dazs does it, in order
7 to make it as -- as easy to get that flavor
8 concentration that the customer likes as possible,
9 (Pause)
10 THE WITNESS: Unforlunatcly, that may be
I I true. But, you aren'_ getting the flavor, --
12 THE COURT: The true --
13 THE WITNESS: -- because you're putting in a
14 very small portion. What you're getting is the
15 acidity.
16 THE COURT: Um hmm. 1 understand what
17 you're saying. From a --
18 THE WITNESS: And--
19 THE COURT: -- from a purist viewpoint, it's
20 not the same thing.
21 THE WITNESS: That's correct.
22 THE COURT: Um hmm.
23 THE WITNESS: And, from the NYA viewpoint,
24 it's not the same thing.
25 THE COURT: Um hmm. You know, it's a very
AI 94
] control, yes.
2 Q Okay. So, producing frozen yogurt this way
3 is not -- well, let me strike that and begin again.
4 I think you testified on direct examination
5 that, in industry practice, there are a number of
6 producers of frozen yogurt who make their product the
7 same -- using the same method that Haagen-Dazs does.
8 Is that correct.'?
9 A Yes, bat I'm not sure that all of those
10 manufacturers have the National Yogurt seal on their
II finished product container.
12 Q Okay. But, it is a common way to make the
13 product known as frozen yogurt in the United States.
)4 A That -- that is one of two ways of doing it,
15 yes, sir.
16 Q Okay.
17 A Whether it's common or not, I don_ know.
18 Q Okay. And, now do you -- you recall that,
19 back on August 28th, we took your deposition in
20 Minneapolis.
21 Do you recall that?
22 A Yes, I do.
23 Q I'm sure it's unforgettable. Not -- not
24 every lawyer asks you about whale milk all the time.
25 With the Court's permission, there's an
95
1 THE WITNESS: Your Honor? The reason -- the
2 reason industry can get away with this juggling act
3 is, as I just -- or we talked about previously. There
4 is -- there is no standard of identity under FDA to --
5 to mandate that industry prepare the product in a
6 specific way. The only -- the only standard is what
7 NYA has.
8 THE COURT: And, that's that one, two,
9 three, four on -- on that page that's in front of you,
10 right? The product must be fermented with --
I I THE WITNESS: Yes, yes. And, let me go back
12 to that page. Yes.
13 THE COURT: Okay. And, if they--if they
14 send in a certified, legitimately certified test that
15 meets those four standards, that's sufficient, as far
16 as the -- as the National Yogurt Association is -- is
17 concerned? For purposes of satisfying their testing
18 requirements?
19 THE WITNESS: It appears like that might be
20 the only requirement. And -- and, certified? I doubt
21 if it needs to be certified. Certainly, it doesn't
22 indicate that an independent third-party laboratory
23 must do this analysis for you.
24 THE COURT: Certified by even the producer?
25 Okay. And, it is--
96
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
BEFORE: HON. EVAN J. WALLACH, JUDGE
THE PILLSBURY COMPANY,
UNITED STATES,
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
Court No. 00-12-00570
ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Rule 7(a) of the Rules of the United States Court of international Trade, the
United States, defendant, responds to the allegations of plaintiffs amended complaint as follows:
1. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to whether
the merchandise described in the allegation as "frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars" contains yogurt
for purposes of the tariff. Denies that the merchandise is "frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars" and .
avers that the merchandise is an article of milk coated with sorbet. Admits the remaining
allcgauons of this paragraph.
2. Admits.
3. Admits.
4. Denies that the merchandise is "frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars" and avers that the
merchandise is an article of milk coated with sorbet. Admits the remainder of the allegations set
forth in this paragraph.
5. Denies that the merchandise is "frozen sorbet/yogurt dessert bars" and avers that the
merchandise is an article ofmilk coated with sorbet. Denies that duty was assessed on the
merchandise at a rate of 50.2¢ per kilogram plus 17% ad valorem and avers that the duty assessed
105
was at a rate of 51.7¢ per kilogram plus 17% ad valorem. Admits the remaining allegations set
forth in this paragraph.
6. Admits that plaintiff filed timely protests at Detroit, Michigan, between May 10 and
July 31 (not JuJy 30), 2000, challenging the classification of the merchandise upon liquidation.
Denies the remaining allegations of the paragraph and avcrs that the protests are the best
evidence of their contents.
7. Admits.
8. Admits.
COUNT I
9. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations contained in
Para_aphs 1 through 8, as if set forth in full herein.
10. Admits that the merchandise is a frozen dessert bar. Denies for lack of information
or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to whether the merchandise described in the allegation
as containing "frozen sorbet/yogurt" contains yogurt for purposes of the tariffand avers it is an
article of milk covered with sorbet. Denies that the merchandise is labeled as either "Raspberry
/Vanilla Yogurt Bar" or "Chocolate Sorbet/Vanilla Yogurt Bar" and avers that the merchandise is
labeled as either "Frozen Yogurt Raspberry & Vanilla" and "Frozen Yogurt Chocolate &
Vanilla" and Lsinvoiced as either "H. Dazs Rasp/Van Yogurt Bar" or "Haagen Dazs Yog
Choc/Van Bar." Admits both products are imported bearing the Htiagen Dazs trademark.
asserted.
11. Denies for lack of inlbrmation or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the mailers asserted.
106
12. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
13. Denies that the merchandise is not "articles of milk or cream." Admits the article is
prepared for marketing to the ultimate consumer in the form in which imported from Canada and
is packaged ready for sale to retail consumers. Denies the remaining allegations set forth in this
paragraph for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
matter asserted.
] 4. Denies.
COUNT !I
15. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations of Paragraphs 1
through 14, as ifset forth in full herein.
16. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
17. Denies that the merchandise is not an "article of milk or cream." Admits the article is
prepared for marketing to the ultimate consumer in the form in which imported from Canada and
is packaged ready for sale to retail consumers. Denies the remaining allegations set forth in this
paragraph for lack of infor'mation or knowledge sufficient _o form a belief as to the truth of the
matter asserted.
18. Denies.
COUNT !II
19. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations of Paragraphs 1
through 18, as if set forth in full herein.
107
20. This para_aph is not comprehensible, therefore, denies.
21. Admits that the cited rulings held that sorbet is classifiable as edible ice. Otherwise
denies. Denies an), inference that the subject merchandise is classifiable under Subheading
2105.00.50 or that it is edible ice.
22. Denies for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to.form a belief as to the truth
of the matters asserted.
23. Admits the rulings cited in paragraph 23 held that frozen yogurt products are not
classifiable as "ice cream"; avers that these rulings were issued prior to the amendment to
Additional U.S. Note 1 to Chapter 4, which is applicable to the subject merchandise.
24. Denies that the merchandise is not "'articles of milk or cream." Denies the last phrase
of this allegation because it is not comprehensible. Admits the article is prepared for marketing
to the ultimate consumer in the form in which imported from Canada and is packaged ready for
sale to retail consumers. Denies the remaining allegations set forth in this paragraph for lack of
information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matter asserted..
25. This allegalion consists of legal argument and no response is required, ira response
is required, denies.
26. Denies for lack of information sufficient to forma belief as to the truth thereof.
COUNT IV
27. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations of Paragraphs 1
through 26, as if set forth in full herein.
28. This allegation consists of legal argument and no response is required. Ifa response
is required, denies.
108
29. This allegation consists of legal argument and no response is required. If a response
is required, admits.
30. Denies.
31. Denies.
COUNT V
32. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses to the allegations of Paragraphs 1
through 31, as if set forth in full herein, purposes. Denies the remaining allegations of this
paragraph.
33. Denies.
34. Admits that Subheading 0403.10.90 provides as quoted. Denies any inference that
the imported merchandise is classifiable under this provision. Denies that the last two digits in
0403.10.90.00 are part of the statutory language of the provision.
35. Denies.
WHEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests that judgment be entered dismissing this
action, overruling plaintifPs claims, sustaining the decisions of the appropriate Customs officials,
109
and granting defendant such other and further relief as may be just and appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT D. MeCALLUM, JR.
Assistant Attorney General
By: JOHN J. MAHON
Acting Attorney in ChargeInternational Trade Field Office
Daled: March 31, 2003
SAUL DAVIS
Senior Trial Counsel
Dept. of Justice, Civil Division
Commercial Litigation Branch26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Attorneys for Defendant
Tel. No. (212) 264.9230 or 3584
110
20
I previously marked for
2 identification as Plaintiff's
3 Exhibit No. I, was admitted into
4 evidence.)
5 BY MR. PETERSON:
6 Q Okay. Now, Mr. Sweet, are you familiar -- I
7 think I asked this -- with the merchandise that's the
8 subject of this lawsuit?
9 A Yes, I am.
10 Q And, could you describe for the Court what
11 that merchandise is?
12 A It's a -- a novelty -- an ice cream novelty.
13 Those are kind of -- we just basically call it a
14 "stick bar." It's a frozen dessert novelty. It has
15 sorbet on the outside, and a fat-free frozen yogurt in
16 the center.
17 Q Okay.
18 (Counsel conferring)
19 MR. PETERSON: My colleague, Mr. Knauss, is
20 now taking Exhibit 2 out of a bag. And, this bag,
21 actually, has been to court before.
22 [Laughter]
23 MR. PETERSON: It was used for demonstration
24 work in the case of Dolly, Incorporated versus United
25 States a couple of months ago.
(212) 349-9692 TARKOOS KE_ORTTBa COMPANY (516) 741-5235
130
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I0
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
Counsel, in their schedule, said that they had no
objection.
T"HE COURT: All right. They're part of the
Court's record already, are they not?
MR. DAVIS: Yes, Your Honor.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q All right. I'm going to show you the --
attached to that entry paper is a photocopy of the
packaging of a Haagen-Dazs raspberry and vanilla
frozen yogurt bar coated with raspberry sorbet.
THE COURT: _Fnere are you in the record?
MR. DAVIS: This is the actual entry, one of
the actual entries in this case, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Do I have that material?
MR. DAVIS: It's a copy that's Defendant's
Exhibit D for identification.
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS:
THE COURT:
"B" as in "bravo"?
"D" as in "davis."
Oh. Thank you.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q This is attached to the actual entries of
the imported merchandise. If you notice, it has an
ACS date of 11/98.
Would that be November of '98?
(witness perusing document)
(212) 349-9692 TANXOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-$23S
136
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
A Yes.
Q would that have been the packaging for the
imported merchandise?
A Could you remind me of the time frame of
this import case?
Q This import occurred on May 6, ' 99.
A That time seems recent -- or recently before
that. I don't know if there was a change between
11/98 and -- and that date. It -- it seems pretty
close. It could have been.
Q But, is it correct to state that the
packaging in Plaintiff's Exhibit 2 for identification
is definitely not the packaging for the imported
merchandise, based on the ACS date you've testified
to?
A
graphic.
This -- there was some change in this
Actually, in this case, the most recent
change was the fact that it changed from the
Haagen-Dazs Company to a company called "Ice Cream
Partners," and that was this graphics change.
The one before that, I'm not exactly sure of
the dates of that, but specifically, this art copy
could not have been used in that time frame.
Q Thank you.
MR. DAVIS: Your Honor, we have no objection
(212) 349-9692 T,%]h_OOBRRPORTZNG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
137
l in your own words for the Court?
2 A Yeah. Let me -- if I could take a little
3 time here, I'll point to some pages in -- in -- if
4 that would be helpful, Your Honor? Of where I'm
5 getting some of the numbers from?
6 THE COURT: If it's helpful to you.
7 THE WITNESS: Okay. I don't remember, to
8 six decimal places, all of this information.
9 THE COURT: We were on the description of
10 the ice milk --
I[ TH]E WITNESS: Right.
|2 THE COURT: -- portion of --
13 A (Continuing) The ice milk base is on Bates
14 Number 646, and it's a combination of a lactose-
]5 reduced skim and condensed skim blend, some liquid
16 sugar, various forms of corn syrup, and water. That
17 is pasteurized and put into a tank.
18 The second component is what we call the
]9 "frozen yogurt base." The ingredients of that are
20 shown on Bates Number 636, or Page 6 of -- of this
21 document. It's a combination of condensed skim milk
22 and water. Those two ingredients are pasteurized, put
23 into a culturing or a fermentation tank, brought to
24 the appropriate temperature.
25 And then, the third ingredient here, which
(212) 349-9692 TARKOOS RBPORTZNG COM]PA]WY (516) 741-5235
45
155
46
1 is the cultures, or the yogurt cultures, are added to
2 that, and then that's incubated for a sufficient
3 amount of time for the organisms to grow to the high
4 numbers.
5 Q Okay. Now, let me just -- I want to focus
6 for a minute on the component that's shown here in
7 Bates Number 636, which is part of Exhibit 4.
8 A Okay.
9 Q You've testified that you combine, I
]0 believe, skim milk and water, and then introduce
II cultures into the mix.
12 A Yes.
]3 Q Could you tell the Court what type of
]4 cultures these are?
15 A I don't -- the organism names are longer
16 than what I can remember, but they're classic yogurt
17 cultures, the same ones that are required in most
18 identification documentation for yogurt.
19 Q Okay.
20 A They're -- lactic acid bacteria is the
21 general classification.
22 Q Okay. And, I believe you indicated that a
23 culture reaction or culturing process takes place,
24 once you introduce these cultures?
25 A Yeah. The organisms come in as, kind of,
(212) 349-9692 TANK009 REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
156
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
51
1 want to have happen is for the organisms to grow, as
2 -- or multiply. As they're multiplying, they're --
3 they're consuming the lactose, creating lactic acid,
4 and it tells us when we have the level of sourness or
acidity, and the level of organisms that we -- that we
want.
Q
A
Okay.
And, I -- specifically, I can go to the
chemistry of the test, but I didn't think that's what
you were asking.
Q Now, you testified that these organisms work
on the lactose in the milk.
A Yes.
Q Now, is -- is that a product known as --
when -- when there's a reference to _culturing milk,"
would this be the process that -- that occurs?
A Culturing or fermentation of milk is what is
the process that's occurring here, yes.
Q
milk"?
A I have heard the term.
bit about it. Yeah.
Q
A
Q
Are you familiar with the term "acidified
I've read a little
Okay.
Yes.
The product that is produced as a result of
(212} 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516} 741-5235
161
52
l this yogurt reaction, would that be a product that
2 would be considered to be a cultured milk product, in
3 your opinion -- or, in your -- in your experience?
4 MR. DAVIS: Objection. He's asking for an
5 opinion.
6 MR. PETERSON: I corrected my question.
7 MR. DAVIS: And, even under the questiDn,
8 he's asking for an opinion. And, counsel specifically
9 stated that this was going to be a fact witness, not
10 expressing opinion. And, we deposed him, based upon
II that fact, and we didn't conduct an expert deposition,
12 with that -- based upon that statement by counsel.
|3 THE COURT: Mr. Peterson?
14 MR. PETERSON: I'll be happy to re-phrase my
15 questions, Your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Go ahead and re-phrase it,
]7 because I'm sustaining the objection as it stands.
18 MR. PETERSON: Okay.
19 BY MR. PETERSON:
20 Q Mr. Sweet, in industry, to your knowledge,
2! is there a product or a group of products known by the
22 term "cultured milk'?
23 A I have no used that term in industry, but I
24 have heard of it.
25 Q And, could you tell us what that term means?
(212) 349-9692 TJ_'K00B uRPORT_G COMPANY (516) 741-5235
162
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
53
1 A
2 been cultured.
3 Q And, when you say "cultured,
4 --
5 A
Q
A
Well, I mean, cultured milk, milk that's
" what would be
where --
-- what would be done to culture milk?
Where organisms have been allowed to grow
and multiply within the substrate of the milk.
Q Now, you testified that organisms are added
to this component of the frozen yogurt.
Yes.
And, would those organisms be considered
A
Q
cultures?
A
Q
Yes.
And, would the process that they perform
upon this component of the frozen yogurt be considered
a culturing process?
MR. DAVIS: Objection. Leading.
THE COURT: Well, sustained.
MR. PETERSON: Okay.
THE COURT: Re-phrase it.
BY MR. PETERSON:
Q What would be the name of the process that
these yogurt -- that these cultures perform on the
milk product which is included in this component?
(212) 349-9692 TAIgX00S RHPORT][NG COMPJt, NY (516) 74_.-5235
163
54
| A As I stated before, it,s a culturing or
2 fermentation process.
3 Q Thank you.
4 Now, after the culturing process has been
5 performed to this component of the frozen yogurt, is
6 anything else done to manufacture the frozen yogurt
7 component of Exhibit 2?
8 A As I had mentioned previously, yes. This,
9 then, is combined with some additional ingredients,
10 and the sweeteners, and stuff.
II Q Okay. Could you describe for us precisely
12 the additional ingredients that this component is
13 combined with?
14 A That was the ice milk base, that I referred
15 to previously.
16 (Witness perusing document)
17 THE COURT: /Lnd, lots of sugar, corn syrup,
A
yeah.
Q
And -- and, the lactose-reduced skim milk,
Thank you, Your Honor.
And, I'm sorry, that's how on -- is that --
THE COURT: It's at 646.
THE WITNESS: Oh, there you go. Thank you,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Your Honor.
MR. PETERSON: Thank you, Your Honor.
(212) 349-9692 TANK008 REPORTIHG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
164
59
] A Correct.
2 Q What happens to the acidity, or what happens
3 to the -- to those cultures, when you blend these
4 products together? And, by -o when I say "blending
5 together," I'm referring to the yogurt base and the
6 ice milk base.
7 A Yeah. One piece I didn't mention is the
8 yogurt, after it reaches the level of titratable
9 acidity, and the organisms have grown, now it's
]0 cooled. If it's cooled below forty-five, fifty
|| degrees below that, then the organisms stop growing.
12 So, we kind of lock them there.
|3 But, if you would warm them up again, they
]4 would start growing again, like in your intestines, or
]5 some place like that.
]6 In this case, the organisms are active, but
17 they're not growing. When they,re blended into what
|8 we call the ice milk base, they're equally distributed
]9 throughout the whole thing, and become an integral
20 part, then, of that total mix.
2| Q Okay. So, then, the total mix, does the
22 total mix have a property of titratable acidity?
23 A The blended yogurt mix -- well, all milk has
24 titratable acidity. This has a higher titratable
25 acidity than it would have if we hadn't added the
(212) 349-9692 TANK00S R3PORTING CONPANY (516) 741-5235
169
98
[No response]
For the actual imported --
The frozen yogurt base is combined with what
l requirements, "B" and "C"?
2 (Pause )
3 MR. DAVIS: My understanding is one is tied
4 into the other.
5 (pau s e )
6 THE COURT: What's the basis for your
7 understanding, Mr. Davis? I don't want you to
8 testify. You tell me what's the basis. Do you have
9 expert testimony as to that?
I0 MR. DAVIS: Consultation with my expert, and
I] a different printout from the website. May I have a
12 moment, Your Honor?
13 (Counsel conferring)
14 MR. DAVIS : My apologies, Your Honor. I
15 misunderstood that. I'll withdraw that aspect, and
16 I'll leave it for my expert. I do have one further
17 question.
18 BY MR. DAVIS:
19 Q Mr. Sweet, you testified in your earlier
20 testimony that the frozen yogurt mix is combined with
21 the flavored ice milk mix.
22 Is that correct?
23 A
24 Q
25 A
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO8 REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
208
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
we call an ice milk base.
Q The flavored ice milk base.
Is that correct?
A [No response]
Q I think that's what --
A I -- I don't recall if we flavor it before
or after we add that yogurt base.
MR. PETERSON: Objection, Your Honor. Does
this go to the voir dire?
MR. DAVIS: This goes to the testing, yes,
Your Honor.
THE COURT: I'll allow you to tie it up, but
that wasn't the Court's recollection of the witness's
testimony.
A (Continuing) But, I can confirm that. Just
one second.
(Witness perusing document)
You are correct. The ice milk base is
And then, the yogurt base is added to that.
A
flavored.
Correct.
O Okay.
temperature of less than forty-five degrees,
if my memory serves me correctly.
Is that correct?
A
Now, you also stated that it was at a
if I --
I think what I testified to was that it
(212) 349-9692 TAITKOOS REPORTING COMPAN"Z (516) 741-5235
99
209
100
1 needed to be below forty-five to fifty, to stop the
2 growth of the organisms.
3 Q Right.
4 A But, what it actually is, is it is below
5 forty-five.
6 Q Okay. Now, if it,s below forty-five, that
7 means that the organisms cannot cause any further
8 fermentation.
9 Is that correct?
I0 A That's correct.
II Q So, at that stage, when the ice milk base
12 was added -- was mixed, rather, with the frozen yogurt
]3 base, after the mixing, there was no further
14 fermentation of the ice milk base.
]5 Is that correct?
16 A Correct.
17 Q I refer you to Plaintiff's Exhibit 7, at
18 Page 7.
19 THE COURT: What would the heading of that
20 be, please?
2] MR. DAVIS: National Yogurt Association
22 Criteria for Live and Active Culture Yogurt.
23
24
25
THE COURT:
referring?
MR. DAVIS:
Okay. What -- to what are you
The top of the page.
(212) 349-9692 TANKO08 REPORTII;G COMPORT (516) 741-5235
210
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
101
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q It says "live and active culture yogurt,
paten, refrigerated cup and frozen yogurt, is the food
produced by culturing Grade A dairy ingredients with a
characterizing bacterial culture in accordance with
the standards of identity for yogurt, low-fat yogurt,
and non-fat yogurt."
Do you see that?
A At the very top, yes.
Q All right. Now, was the entire -- was the
entire dairy portion -- milk portion -- cultured --
THE COURT: How does this relate to your
voir dire regarding that testing document, --
MR. DAVIS: Because, the testing document --
THE COURT:
examination.
MR. DAVIS:
-- as -- as opposed to cross-
The testing document indicates
certain criteria that have to be met, but that
criteria is not met by the frozen yogurt, per se.
It's met only by the --
document.
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS :
THE COURT :
Mr. -- Mr. Davis, --
Yes.
-- you're asking about a testing
That's all you're limited to right now.
(212) 349-9692 TAm[0OS IU_POltT1"NG COMPANI? (516) 741-5235
211
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I!
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
102
You tell me how this relates to the testing document.
MR. DAVIS: The testing document purports to
test the -- the vanilla frozen yogurt bar, and to
provide results from that testing. One of the -- for
purposes of live and active culture yogurts.
One of the criteria for live and active
culture yogurts, frozen yogurt, is that the entire --
the entire milk portion be cultured. That's the
portion that we just read now. Plus, the -- and,
besides that, the federal regs cited also require
that.
If this testing was done on a product that
was not completely cultured, then the testing is
irrelevant, because, in any event, it doesn't comply
with the live and -- with the criteria for frozen
yogurt by the National Yogurt Association.
THE COURT: Well, I'll let you ask the
question. Go ahead.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q Does that statement require that -- or
define yogurt as a product that has been fermented?
A I'm sorry. Ask that one more time?
Q Does that statement define yogurt as a
product, both refrigerated cup and frozen yogurt, as
a product that has been fermented?
(212) 349-9692 TKIRK00BREPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
212
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1 A
2 by --
3 Q
4 A
5 Q
fermented.
A
0
A
103
It defines it as a -- as a product produced
By culturing.
-- by culturing.
And, "by culturing" means it has to be
Is that correct?
Produced from --
NOI --
-- the fermented milk, yes.
food produced --
Q By culturing.
A Okay.
This says a
Q "By culturing _ means the product that is
known as "yogurt" or "frozen yogurt" has to be --
A Has been cultured.
Q -- cultured.
A Correct.
Q Was the ice milk base cultured?
A No.
Q Does this test reflect a test for results
relating to compliance with the NYA requirements for
frozen yogurt, --
A The --
Q -- for the entire bar?
(23.2) 349-9692 TA,_I_OOS I_.)_I:_ORTZHOCOM]PJUq_ (516) 741-5235
213
5
6
7
8
9
I0
I!
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
107
address the relevance objection, first.
We are not contending that the test records
that we're looking to move into evidence relate to the
imported merchandise. We're not saying that these
test records relate to the merchandise that were
imported in 1999. They couldn't have. They're dated
1995 and 1997.
THE COURT: If you're saying there's no
relation whatsoever, then --
MR. PETERSON: No, the reason that we're
introducing them is we are introducing them simply in
support of Mr. Sweet's statement that, from time to
time, I believe he testified, The Pillsbury Company
tests frozen yogurt.
formula was started,
THE COURT:
there --
MR. PETERSON:
THE COURT: --
MR. PETERSON:
I believe he indicated when the
to see what the --
Well, now you're saying that
-- culture level was.
is a relation.
well, we're -- well, we're
not offering these documents for the proposition
regarding what specifically the live and active yogurt
culture level in the merchandise at bar was. I
believe Mr. Sweet testified they don't perform that
testing for every --
(212) 349-9692 TANK009 REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
217
123
1 Q Okay. Now, you've testified as to the way
2 in which the frozen yogurt component of this product
3 is manufactured.
4 Can you tell the Court whether any whole
5 cream milk is used in manufacturing the frozen yogurt
6 component of the bar?
7 A There is no whole cream milk in this
8 product.
9 Q And, can you tell the Court whether there is
10 any skim milk used in production of the yogurt
l| component of the imported bar?
12 A There is a condensed skim milk, and a
]3 lactose-reduced skim milk used in this bar.
14 Q And, you testified that the reduced-fat skim
15 milk is processed prior to being put in the form of
]6 the frozen yogurt, correct?
17 A Say that one more time?
18 Q You -- you testified earlier this morning as
19 to the processes that are performed, for example, to
20 the yogurt base, and to the ice milk base, in order to
21 make frozen yogurt.
22 THE COURT: Mr. Peterson, I'm going to let
23 you build to something, if you need to, but try to
24 avoid being repetitive of what he's already testified
25 to, all right?
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS RKPORTZ_ COMPANY (516) 741-5235
233
124
] MR. PETERSON: Yes.
2 BY MR. PETERSON:
3 Q Is there anything done to the skim milk
4 components of the frozen yogurt during the processing,
5 that would change their characteristics as skim milk,
6 and transform them into something else?
7 A Some of the condensed skim milk is used in
8 the yogurt base, itself, that actually gets chemically
9 modified through fermentation, and the lactose is
|0 converted to lactic acid.
]] There is the lactose-reduce process, but
]2 that's as we purchase it. That doesn't -- that does
13 not occur during the process.
14 There is also some skim milk in -- in the
]5 ice milk base. That is pretty much intact. When you
16 add the acid and the culture to it, however, it
17 becomes so integrated, you can't really separate out
18 what was the skim milk and what was the fermented skim
19 milk. It's all kind of insidious, throughout the
20 whole thing.
21 Now, you used the term "fermented skimQ
milk"?
A
Q
22
23
24
25
Yeah.
Is fermented skim milk recognized in
commerce or industry as something other than skim
(212) 349-9692 TJI_KOOP, KIBPORTZllG COM]PJ_I {516) '741-5235
234
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
i6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
153
] THE COURT: All right. Then, we'll let you
2 go through your direct, and then break for lunch.
3 MR. PETERSON: Okay.
4 THE COURT: And then, do cross after lunch.
5 For some reason, the Court just has this urge to go
OUt and have a big dish of chocolate and raspberry
yogurt.
[Laughter]
MR. PETERSON:
brand, Your Honor.
0
We can recommend a very good
[Laughter]
BY MR. PETERSON:
Could you go into the formula-in column, and
identify for the Court those components of the
raspberry/vanilla sorbet/yogurt bar which are milk or
made from milk?
A It's identical to the chocolate sorbet and
yogurt bar. They're not all exactly in the same
place, but one is the condensed skim milk, eight-
point-two four percent. And, at the bottom, the same
LR-skim, at thirteen-point-one nine.
Q Okay. And, could you again show us in the
formula-out column which components of the bar are
milk or are dairy products?
A Certainly. The third one, which is the LR-
(212) 349-9692 TANK00S RmPORTIMG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
263
154
1 skim condensed skim blend. And, the skim milk
2 condensed, which is the sixth one down.
3 Q Okay. Now, if you could look at Plaintiff's
4 Exhibit 3, is there contained in there the formula for
5 the raspberry yogurt -- the raspberry sorbet -- I
6 apologize -- that is included in the bar?
7 A Just the sorbet mix formula?
8 Q The sorbet mix formula.
9 A Yeah. That, actually, is in the part with
10 the Bates numbers. I mean, it's embedded in here, but
II it's tough to pull out, but the total -- the total --
12 Q Okay.
13 (Witness perusing document)
14 A This was made a little bit differently than
]5 the -- the chocolate one? The chocolate one, you can
16 put the cocoa and everything through the
17 pasteurization. But, you don't want to add that heat
18 to the raspberry. So, we put it together in two
19 places.
20 One is Bates Number 1274, which is corn
21 syrup, water, liquid sugar, and pectin.
22 (witness perusing document)
23 A And, that shows on Bates Page 1281, where we
24 take that, what we call the "un-flavored sorbet base"
25 here, that I mentioned before, combine that with lemon
(212) 349-9692 TANK00B REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
264
177
would have been shown in the formula-in/formula-out.
As you go across, there,s a percentage used.
The,e shou]d be very s_m_lar, again, to the
formula-in/formula-out.
There,s a little bit of difference in the
way we do accounting on milk, because we buy it on a
solids basis, and some things like that.
Q Okay. When you talk about the percentage --
5
6
7
8
9
I0 THE COURT: Excuse me. The Court has a
II problem with this proposed exhibit. As the witness
12 indicated, what's in front of him -- and I'm sure that
13 I can look and see that it's the same as what's in
]4 front of me -- cuts off the names of the ingredients
]5 on the left side, such that for -- for a substantial
16 num_r of them, I can't tell what they are, and I know
|7 -- and the witness said he can't tell what at least
18 some of them are.
19 MR. PETERSON: Well, I don't -- again, I
20 don't know that the witness said he couldn't identify
21 the ingredients. He indicated they were cn/t off. If
22 it would help the Court, we could ask the witness if
23 he could identify the full names of these ingredients.
24 THE COURT: Well, he did say on some of them
25 that he couldn't. But -- but, let's hear on 1368 what
(212) 349-9692 TAafKOOS REPORTING COl(PANT (516) 741-5235
287
1 THE COURT:
2 MR. DAVIS:
3 identification.
4 THE COURT:
5 MR. DAVIS:
THE COURT:
Where are you?
Plaintiff's Exhibit 14 for
189
Oh, thank you. Bates 10237
1023. And --
All right. Are you asking him6
7 to testify from something that's not admitted?
8 MR. DAVIS: No, but what I'm asking him is
9 that is there a difference in price, a significant
10 difference in price of an ingredient that just doesn't
I| appear here, in this sheet, at all.
]2 A (Continuing) So, ask me that one more time.
13 Q All right. Taking a look at --
14 A Yes.
]5 Q -- Plaintiff's Exhibit 14, --
16 A Yes.
17 Q -- do you see a price per kilogram in
]8 Canadian dollars there?
19 A Right.
20 Q That's a very large amount, isn't that?
21 A [NO response]
22 Q That doesn't appear at all on Plaintiff's
23 Exhibit 15 for identification, at 1368.
24 A I understand why that's confusing. When you
25 buy condensed milk products, you pay for it on a
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTIHG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
299
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
190
1 solids basis. And, when the people do financing,
2 sometimes they bring ic back to the actual formula?
3 You -- so, you're really paying for -- even
4 though it's a kilogram, for example, the unit is a
5 kilogram. It's really a kilogram of solids.
6 And, the -- and, the water is part of the
It -- that's -- I know it's -- I know it'sformula.
confusing.
MR. DAVIS: Your Honor, I don't see the
connection with the imported -- costing for the actual
imported merchandise in this case. I object.
basis.
THE COURT :
MR. DAVIS:
You're objecting on irrelevance
On a -- on irrelevance and
connection basis.
Davis.
THE COURT :
MR. DAVIS:
But, yes, irrelevance basis.
That's what irrelevance is, Mr.
I'm sorry, Your Honor, yes.
He hasn't shown it, and he's testified that
one of the very important ingredients on the frozen
yogurt side is not even in 1368.
THE COURT: well, let me hear -- let me hear
from you, Mr. Peterson, why proposed fourteen -- or
proposed fifteen is relevant, not based on what Mr.
Davis just said, but -- because I understand exactly
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COH.PART (51G) 741-5235
300 ..
215
| Its purpose -- purpose was to communicate to
2 the co-packer what the requirements and standards
3 were.
4 Q were these documents approved by higher-
5 level officials of Pillsbury before they were issued?
6 A There are several people who have to review
7 them and sign them. Typically, only to a manager
8 level, which would have been me.
9 Q All right. Were you actually involved with
I0 the -- with the documents depicted in exhibit -- what
11 I call Three-A?
]2 A These particular documents, for these
]3 particular products, no, I did not specifically review
14 these.
15 Q That would have been another manager at
16 Pillsbury?
]7 A Yeah.
]8 Q Do you know why they were titled
19 "Haagen-Dazs -- frozen yogurt"?
20 A Versus anything else?
21 Q Well, what is that? What is that title?
22 What does that designate?
23 A That first column there is the category of
24 products that we just put that in to help track how
25 many specs we have in different categories. It's part
(212) 349-9692 TAlq1_O08 RXPORTZNG COMI_/L1L_ (516) 741-5235
325
7
8
9
10
!1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
216
of how you search for items in our spec system.
Q Okay. So, that's a category that
Haagen-Dazs developed, and then it put this product in
that category.
Is that what you're saying?
A It was what we titled the category, to put a
bunch of specs in there, yeah.
Q Okay. And then, the next line, it says
"raspberry and vanilla fat-free yogurt bar."
What does that describe?
A Classically, that then is the name of the
product put on -- put on the package.
I will admit, being one of the people who
review this, these kinds of things, X tend to be, you
know, go more into the formula changes, and the
titling may or may not have been exactly what the
packaging read.
Q Axe there any Pillsbury procedures for
putting products in one category or another category?
A No. It's just wherever they seem to fit.
THE COURT:
THE WITNESS:
MR. DAVIS:
what page are you on?
Oh, I'm sorry.
That was -- that was the first
page, Your Honor, of exhibit -- what I had as Three-A.
The first numbered page is Page i.
(212) 349-9(;92 TANI_OOg 2EPORT'rNG COMPA,W'Y (516) 741-5235
326
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
THE COURT: Yeah, that's my problem.
getting this Three-A, Three-B. I apologize.
MR. DAVIS: I know, that's -- I had some
problems with that, too, Your Honor.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q Going to what I have as Three-B, that begins
with the Bates numbers -- I'm sorry, Four, Bates
Number 620.
A Okay.
Q The date on that document is also May i0.
'99, which is the period in issue,
Again, that product is the chocolate and
vanilla fat-free frozen yogurt bar? Is that correct?
A That's what the document is titled, yes.
Q All right. And, what category was that put
in?
217
I keep
A Similar to the other one, right above it, it
says, "Haagen-Dazs dash frozen yogurt."
Q All right. During this period of time, did
Haagen-Dazs also have a, quote, "sorbet" category?
A Yes.
(Pause)
Q Now, going to the entry papers --
MR. DAVIS: May I approach the witness, Your
Honor?
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOB RRPORTING COMPAN'/ (516) 741-5235
.. 327
218
1 THE COURT: You may.
2 (Counsel and Court Clerk conferring)
3 BY MR. DAVIS:
4 Q I'm going to show you the entry for,
5 according to the entry papers in this case -- we
6 discussed it earlier -- Entry Number 2060596-9.
7 THE COURT: 2060596-9?
8 MR. DAVIS: That's correct.
9 Q In that entry package is a photocopy of
10 packaging that you testified earlier was used as of at
]] least November of ' 98.
]2 Is that correct?
]3 A Correct.
[4 Q All right. And, that describes -- that's
15 packaging for the product in issue, a raspberry and
16 vanilla frozen yogurt bar.
]7 Is that correct?
18 A This is the multi-pack for a frozen yogurt
19 raspberry and vanilla bar, yes.
20 THE COURT: Speak loudly, Mr. Davis. I can
21 hear you, but I'm not sure.
22 MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Your Honor.
23 Q Do you know why the pack is just titled
24 =frozen yogurt"?
25 A As I looked into this, it was -- it was
(212) 349-9692 TJURKOOBJLEI)ORTIITG CO_PJ_'Y (516) 741-5235
328
A
Q
A
Q
the bar?
A
219
] actually very interesting. When we first launched
2 this category of bars, they were called -- the main
3 title was "frozen yogurt." At some point, we changed
4 it to "sorbet and yogurt."
5 It appears that, at some point, they went
6 back to "frozen yogurt." And now, you see it's a
7 "sorbet and yogurt" bar, again.
8 Q All right. Looking at Plaintiff's
9 Exhibit 2, I think it was, the package for the
|0 imported merchandise, they called it "sorbet and
I] yogurt," but if you take a look at the right top hand
|2 [sic] corner, it says "fat-free vanilla frozen yogurt
]3 bar coated with raspberry sorbet. _
14 A Yes.
15 Q Is that a reference to a frozen yogurt bar?
16 Is that the -- the bar, itself?
17 You can't eat one without the other.
]8 Right.
]9 I mean, if I took --
20 What is a "yogurt bar"? The bar? What is
The bar is a -- I mean, it has yogurt in it
and it has sorbet in it.
You eat the whole thing.
you're asking, Mr. Davis.
21
22
23
24
25
So, I mean, what is the bar?
I'm not quite sure what
(212) 349-9692 TANK00S REPORTINO COMPANY (516) 741-5235
329
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
220
Q Have you ever seen packaging for Haagen-Dazs
ice cream that's coated with a chocolate film, or a
chocolate coating?
A Yes.
Q Am I correct in stating that the -- it,s
called an "ice cream bar with a chocolate coating"?
A I imagine it does. I can't visualize that
in front of my face right now.
Q In that situation, am I correct in stating
that the essence of the bar is the ice cream, and the
coating is a flavoring?
A From a consumer standpoint, you'd have to
ask the consumer. In -- in that particular case, it's
ninety percent ice cream, ten percent coating. So,
the predominance of the bar is the ice cream.
If you talk to consumers when we sell that
bar, it,s the coating that seems to drive liking,
actually, more than the ice cream. Interestingly
enough, Haagen-Dazs doesn't like to admit that, but --
[Laughter]
Q Now, if you take a look at this entry again,
there's an invoice here with a description of the
goods. There are three different categories of
merchandise here.
(212) 349-9692 TARKOO8 REPORTING C0MPANT (516) 741-5235
330
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
O
process.
221
Do you see that?
A Yes.
Q Which of the categories describes the
merchandise in this case?
A The three categories here are lemon sorbet,
a mango sorbet, and a raspberry -- =rasp, slash, van,
yogurt bar." It certainly would be the bar.
Q Is there any mention of the sorbet in the
invoice description?
A No.
(Pause)
Now, you described the manufacturing
Is it correct to state that this is a
continuous assembly line, if you will, type process?
Absolutely.
Is it desirable to stop the process at any
A
Q
stage?
A
Q
No.
Is it undesirable to stop it at any stage,
considering the speed of the process?
A Yeah, because the timing and how -- how much
it freezes, and when you suck that back, is critical,
if you would stop it.
Q And also, when you put in the -- the core
(212) 349-9692 TANI_0OS REPORTING COMPANY (5IG) 741-5235
331
I into the shell is very critical, the timing?
2 correct?
3 A
4 Q
5
222
Is that
The timing?
In other words, after you suck out the --
the liquid raspberry portion, --
6 A Um hmm.
7 Q -- the next step is to pump in the frozen
8 yogurt portion.
9 Is that correct?
|0 A Correct.
1| Q Isn't the timing of that also a very
12 important?
13 A That's probably -- the timing of that is
14 probably the least critical. Once the -- the well has
15 been made, that's -- that maintains itself pretty
16 readily.
17 Q Are there times when Pillsbury desires to
18 stop the manufacturing process and, let's say, take
19 any portion out during the -- any component out,
20 during the manufacturing process?
21 A If we did, we'd have to throw away that
22 whole tray's worth of product.
23 Q
24 A
25 0
SO, it's not --
So, no, we would never stop the process.
Okay.
(212) 349-9692 TARKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
332
223
1 (Pause)
2 A Or, in this case, Nestl_.
3 Q Nestl_.
4 Based upon your experience, have you ever
5 seen Pillsbury -- Pillsbury or anyone else sell a
6 raspberry sorbet that had a liquid core of raspberry,
7 in that condition?
8 A Where a frozen product would still be liquid
9 in the center? No.
]0 Q Okay. Now, at the point of suck-out, as you
11 referred to it earlier, the portion that's sucked out
|2 is the liquid raspberry portion.
13 Is that correct?
14 A It's the un-frozen sorbet, yes.
15 Q Okay. Do you know anyone who would buy it
]6 in the condition of the hard, three millimeter shell,
17 and just the raspberry liquid portion?
18 A No.
]9 Q Now, are you familiar with any situation
20 where Pillsbury has actually sold just the raspberry
21 shell, without anything inside? Just the shell?
22 A We have sold a sorbet bar, where it hardened
23 all the way through, but --
24 Q That's not my question.
25 A -- but, certainly, if it was just the shell,
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
333
224
I there's no place to put the stick, so no. we wouldn't
2 -- we would not sell that as a bar.
3 Q So, just the shell, by itself, is not an
4 article of commerce.
5 Is that correct?
6 A [No response]
7 Q From Pillsbury's stand -- standpoint?
8 A We don't sell just the shell.
9 Q Okay. And, the -- just to clarify, the
10 shell with the liquid raspberry sorbet in it, is not
|i an article of commerce either.
]2 Is that correct?
]3 A That's a very temporary article, yeah. It
14 goes away --
15 Q You don't sell it that way.
16 A No, we don't sell it that way.
17 Q Okay.
18 Now, if you'd go to Plaintiff's Exhibit 4?
19 (Pause)
20 Q Do you know who made that exhibit? Again,
21 was that the R and D people?
22 A Yes. The R and D people made the -- yes.
23 Q And, was it approved by management-level
24 people?
25 A Up to manager level, yes.
(212) 349-9692 TAN][OOB _PO21"I"NG CO]_L:Ab_ (51(;) 741-5235
334
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Q
A
Q
225
Okay. Now, if you go to Bates Number 692.
Okay.
That,s dated May i0, '99.
Is that correct?
A Yes.
Q All right.
importation.
That's right about the period of
Is that correct?
9 A That's my understanding.
I0 Q Do you know why it's referred to as "yogurt
II bar process"?
12 A The graphic, itself, --
13 Q The title, at the top.
14 A -- is -- is imported -- when this is made,
15 it's not -- it's not made as a one-up. It's a -- it's
16 not like a hand-typed document, and created from
17 scratch each time.
18 Our specification process imports pieces in
19 different stages. This graphic is a stage. It gets
20 pulled into a lot of specs.
21 When the spec was approved, that graphic was
22 also, in effect, re-approved. But, it was originally
23 created well before that date.
24 Q All right. How far back was Pillsbury
25 making a frozen yogurt bar with a raspberry or
(212) _49-9G92 TABOO08 RIPOXTZNO COMPANY (S16) 741-5235
335
| chocolate coating?
2 '91/'927
3 A That was -- yeah,
4 there, yes.
(Pause)
226
Am I correct it goes back to about
witness?
THE COURT: You may.
' 92/,93, somewhere in
5
6 Q Now, you had discussed some of the marketing
7 information that's depicted in Plaintiff' s
8 Exhibits 11, 12, and 13.
9 A Um hn_n.
]0 Q Were those documents part of a much larger
J | marketing submission?
12 A Submission?
]3 Q Or document, if you will?
14 A The size of these documents, and the size of
15 the report is a common size. It's a top-line report.
|6 And, oftentimes, it is just the report.
17 Specifically, these documents were before my
18 time, so I'm not -- I'm not familiar with whether or
19 not there's a larger document or not.
20 (Pause)
2| Q Now, I'm going to show you Defendant's
22 Exhibit C, Tab 4, for identification.
23 MR. DAVIS: Your Honor, may I approach the
24
25
(212) 349-9692 TJLI_CO09 ILI_I)ORTZIHroCO)IPJt_TY (51(;) 741-5235
336
227
] A Thank you.
2 (Witness perusing document)
3 Q Have you seen that document before?
4 A I have seen this style of document before.
5 This is Bates Number 189.
6 Q Could you describe what that is?
7 A It's what we call a PAD, or a project
8 initiation document. This document was filled out,
9 usually, by marketing, to indicate to the business
10 that they were intending to launch a new project which
|I might end up in actually launching a new product.
12 Q Is this a Pillsbury business record?
13 A Yes.
14 Q Is this the type of document that Pillsbury
15 typically makes when it decides to launch new
16 products?
17 A Yes. It's basically to get approval by some
18 senior management to go ahead and look in -- look into
19 the possibility of launching a new product.
20 MR. DAVIS: I would move this document into
2[ evidence, Your Honor.
22 MR. PETERSON: No objection, Your Honor.
23 THE COURT: What's your exhibit number?
24 MR. DAVIS: It's Exhibit C, Tab 5 [sic],
25 beginning at Bates Number 189 through Bates Number
(212) 349-9692 TARKOOS REPORTING COMP&NT (516) 741=5235
337
195 .
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS:
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS:
228
Exhibit C, Tab 5?
Yes.
What is it?
I'm sorry.
Four or five?
Four. I looked at5
6 the wrong side. My apologies, Your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Exhibit C, Tab 4, is admitted,
8 there being no objection.
9 (The document referred to above,
I0 previously marked for
II identification as Defendant's
12 Exhibit C, Tab 4, was admitted
13 into evidence.)
14 BY MR. DAVIS:
15 Q Now, you've stated that you've seen this
16 type of document on -- with regard to other products
17 also.
18 Is that correct?
19 A Yes, um hmm.
20 Q when it talks about _project," what is the
21 intent of that category?
22 A Just an overall description, to let senior
23 management know the -- the product category that we're
24 looking to launch a new product in.
25 Q Is this a yogurt bar with a sorbet -- does
(212) 349-9692 TARKOOS IEPOITING COIPANT (516) 741-5235
338
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
229
this encompass, rather, a yogurt bar with a sorbet
coating?
A The term "frozen yogurt bar" has been used
by Pillsbury and Haagen-Dazs to refer to this style of
bar, yes.
Q
A
O
This -- I'm sorry?
Style of bar.
Okay. This style of bar being a -- a bar
with a frozen yogurt center and a coating of sorbet?
A Yeah, yes.
Q When you're --
A With --
Q -- referring to this style of bar, were you
-- were you holding up Plaintiff's Exhibit 2?
A I was holding -- holding this up just to
have the picture. The bar, itself, in the form, has
So, this -- when I say "this style,"never changed.
N?
Q
A
Q
It's at Bates Number 189,
Okay.
-- all throughout its many names? Yes.
Do you know who Paul Curhan is? C-U-R-H-A-
at the top, right under
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
339
1
2
3
4
5
A
Q
A
Q
Oh I - _
-- H-A-N.
NO, I'm not familiar with that gentleman.
Okay. Now, in this document, if you look
under "business rationale," it says -- in the second
6 category, it says, "currently only have one strong
7 SKU, raspberry, dash, vanilla."
8 A Um hmm.
9 Q What does the "SKU" stand for?
I0 A I never remember. Basically, every
]l individual item, as it's sold, has a different SKU. A
12 multi-pack is a different SKU. It's a single-
|3 something-unit. I don't know.
14 Q Is that like a reference to a model number,
15 if you will?
16 A No. It's more of a inventory number, or a
]7 different unit as sold.
]8 (Pause)
19 Q If you take a look at Bates Number 190 in
20 that exhibit? At the bottom, under Roman numeral six,
21 for SKU rationalization, --
22 A
23 0
24 A
25 Q
Okay.
-- sub-B, as in =boy"?
Okay.
It says, "For each new SKU, slash_ flavor,
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO8 REPORTIHG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
230
340
231
1 please indicate whether intention is broadening taste
2 options, et cetera."
3 Does that SKI/, slash, flavor indicate that
4 the term SKU is referring to separate flavors? Each
5 SKU being a different flavor?
6 A In this instance, it's -- it's being used to
7 just say "flavor _ and not necessarily package type,
8 yes.
9 Q Okay.
]0 (Pause)
|1 Q I refer you to Plaintiff's -- to Defendant's
12 Exhibit C, Tab 3, for identification, beginning with
13 Bates Number 25 through 60.
14 A I have it.
15 (Witness perusing document)
]6 Q Is it correct that you've seen this doctunent
17 before, and that you testified that this is the actual
]8 product planning documents for the merchandise in
]9 issue?
20 A I don't recall if we've discussed this
21 specific document yet.
22 Q No, I'm talking about at your deposition.
23 Did you identify it that way?
24 (pause)
25 A Please state your question again?
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO8 RRPORT'rNG COMPANY (51G) 741-5235
341
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
232
Q All right. Are these -- is this document a
Pillsbury business record?
A Yes.
O Is this the type of document that Pillsbury¢
issues when it intends to develop prototypes of its
various dessert bars?
A This is a marketing document which was -- is
put together during -- after the project has been
initiated, to start to -- to start to screen through
concepts.
So, it's not necessarily announcing we're
going to. This is, actually, part of the going to.
Q Okay.
A We are -- we are actually, now, starting to
understand how we're going to approach the project.
Q Is this type of document normally produced
by the Pillsbury personnel as part of their duties, in
the course of going through the prototype process?
A Prototype process usually means making up
bars. This is actually a -- this talks about
prototypes, but it's really do it more on concepts.
I can answer your question as yes, but
technically, it's --
Q It's not prototype process, but it's
normally done by Pillsbury personnel in the course of
(212) 349-9692 TANK00S REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
342
| their duties during their technical write-ups.
2 A And developing --
3 THE COURT: Conceptualizing.
4 A -- the market concepts, yes.
5 Q And developing the market concepts.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
you.
Thank
MR. DAVIS: Your Honor, I would move this
into evidence as a business -- a better business
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS:
That's C-three?
That's C-three, for
record.
No objection, Your Honor.
There being no objection, C-
233
(The document referred to above,
previously marked for
identification as Defendant's
Exhibit C, Tab 3, was acimitted
into evidence.)
Do you
identification.
MR. PETERSON:
THE COURT:
three is admitted.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q Now, if you look at Bates Number 25?
have that in front of you?
A Yes. Thank you.
Q It says "raspberry sorbet with vanilla
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOB REPORTZNO COMPANY (516) 741-5235
343
7
8
9
I0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
234
yogurt bar."
Is that the imported merchandise?
A Yes.
THE COURT: Say, just to shortcut this,
unless you need to do otherwise, why are you doing
this foundational examination, Mr. Davis, when the
Plaintiffs don't object to your Exhibits A, B, or C?
MR. DAVIS: Well, I just wanted to identify
-- I'm sorry. Well, I guess it may be easier just to
move them in, as I go along, rather than -- the reason
I do it is that the Court has an option, even though
Plaintiff doesn't object, just to exclude it, if the
Court so wishes.
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS:
Well, --
But, if -- if the Court desires,
1,11 be happy just to move it in and then go to my
substantive questions.
THE COURT: Why don't you do that?
MR. DAVIS: Thank you, Your Honor.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q If you take a look at the category, what
category was this bar placed in, in this document?
A What category? We were calling this --
let's see, 1991, we were calling this "frozen yogurt
bars, _ at that time.
(212) 349-9(;92 TAICKOOB mRDORTI"]BG COlUMn/' (516) 741-5235
344 __
244
| THE COURT: Is there a Yogurt Bureau of
2 Investigation?
3 [Laughter]
4 A I mean, certainly they review the documents
5 when you submit. But, after that, I don't know.
6 Q And, the -- all right.
7 Now, you testified during direct examination
8 in a series of questions whether or not the frozen
9 yogurt portion of the imported bars is full cream
10 milk, or skim milk.
11 Do you recollect that testimony?
12 A Yes.
13 Q All right. Now, my question to you is are
14 the frozen yogurt components, the dairy components,
15 made down the line from whole milk?
16 A At one point, all milk starts as whole milk.
17 Q And, further up the totem pole, if you will,
18 were they made from skim milk?
19 A Well, that would be further down the totem
20 pole.
21 Q
22 A
23 going.
24 Q
25 A
Well, --
Well, it depends which direction you're
Going, right.
Okay. You're starting at the bottom.
(212) 349-9692 TANKO0S HPORTING COMYANT (516) 741-5235
354
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
10?
245
[Laughter]
A Okay. I usually start at the top.
The ingredients we use came out of the cow.
They were turned into skim milk, and then condensed.
Q Okay.
(Pause )
Q I refer you to Defendant's Exhibit C-IO, Tab
Do you have that?
(Witness perusing document)
A Yes, sir.
Q At Bates Number 13467 Do you see that?
(Pause)
A Yes.
Q Now, the yogurt temperature --
MR. DAVIS:
THE COURT:
MR. DAVIS:
THE COURT:
And, does Your Honor have that?
I do now.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q In Step Number 14, yogurt temperature?
you see that?
A Yes.
Q At what stage of the process is that
temperature being measured?
A That's when it's exiting the freezer, as
Do
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO8 REPORTING COMPART (516) 741-5235
355
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
256
A
SO, - -
Q
A
Q
A
It's twenty-five millimeters to an inch.
All right.
-- you do the math.
Right.
My brain is getting a little tired today.
(Pause)
THE COURT: I think before you ask a lawyer
to do math, Mr. Sweet, you should realize that the
reason we're not doctors is because we couldn't do the
math to get into medical school.
[Laughter]
THE WITNESS: Yeah, thank you, Your Honor.
MR. DAVIS: Or, we couldn't stand the sight
of blood.
[Laughter]
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q Now, you testified during my voir dire on
Plaintiff's Exhibit 15, that Pillsbury and,
presumably, Nestl_'s, purchased milk on a solids
basis.
Do you recollect that?
A I know that milk many times is purchased on
a solids basis. I didn't look at that particular
invoice long enough to determine if that's how that
TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY(212) 349-9692
366
(516) 741"5231//"
=m=._
%
257
1 was done, but it looked that way.
2 Q All right. Well, my recollection says that
3 was something to the effect that you said that we
4 usually purchase on a solids basis.
5 A On a solids basis.
6 Q Why is the -- why is that done? Why not on
7 a liquid basis?
8 A If you just buy a pound of milk, it could
9 allow milk suppliers to add water and -- and cause
10 some problems. If you buy it on a solids basis, it
|I kind of keeps them honest.
12 Q Wel_, what kind of problems would the
13 addition of water cause?
14 A Then you wouldn't be buying what you thought
15 you were buying.
16 I mean, it is also true that there is
17 variation cow-to-cow, herd-to-herd, season-to-season,
]8 and we actually formulate on a solids basis. So, we
19 just need to know that that's what we're buying.
20 Q From what you're saying, the solids basis
21 seems to be the most accurate basis for purchasing
22 milk?
23 A
24 Q
25
Exactly.
Okay.
(Pause)
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO8 REPORTZNG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
367
296
| Culture Yogurt.
2 (Witness perusing document)
3 A I have it.
4 Q All right. Can you read that first
5 sentence?
6 A Starting "Live and active culture yogurt"?
7 Q Yes. It's in the record already. Just read
8 it to yourself, if you can.
9 A Yes.
]0 (Pause )
l] A Yes.
12 Q Under that requirement, can an article be
13 treated as cultured yogurt, or a refrigerated cup of
]4 frozen yogurt, for purposes of the NYAA -- I'm sorry,
15 NXA requirements, without the entire dairy constituent
]6 being fermented?
]7 A No, it cannot, according to this sentence.
]8 Q Now, have you examined -- you stated that
19 you examined Haagen-Dazs's documents, processing
20 documents.
21 Do you remember what percentage of the
22 yogurt bar -- I'm sorry, the yogurt core was the
23 frozen yogurt base that was actually fermented?
24 A Twelve percent.
25 (Pau se )
(212) 349-9692 TAI_CO08 RRPOZTINO COMPAI_f (516) 741-5235
406
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
297
THE WITNESS: Your Honor? The reason -- the
reason industry can get away with this jugg1{ng act
is, as I just -- or we talked about previously. There
is -- there is no standard of identity under FDA to --
to mandate that industry prepare the product in a
specific way. The only -- the only standard is what
NYA has.
THE COURT: And, that's that one, two,
three, four on -- on that page that's in front of you,
right? The product must be fermented with --
THE WITNESS: Yes, yes. And, let me go back
to that page. Yes.
THE COURT: Okay. And, if they -- if they
send in a certified, legitimately certified test that
meets those four standards, that's sufficient, as far
as the -- as the National Yogurt Association is -- is
concerned? For purposes of satisfying their testing
requirements?
THE WITNESS:
the only requirement.
It appears like that might be
And -- and, certified? I doubt
if it needs to be certified. Certainly, it doesn't
indicate that an independent third-party laboratory
must do this analysis for you.
THE COURT: Certified by even the producer?
Okay. And, it is --
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPAN_ (516) 741-5235
.. 407
5
6
7
8
9
I0
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
298
THE WITNESS: On the letterhead, maybe, --
THE COURT: It says, the way I read --
THE WITNESS: -- is all that's required --
THE COURT: -- this thing, here's the first
two paragraphs, which are the criteria for live and
active culture yogurt, right?
THE WITNESS: Yes.
THE COURT: And, that's what the title --
THE WITNESS: And -- and frozen yogurt.
THE COURT: Yeah, and that's what the title
says.
THE WITNESS: Um hmm.
THE COURT: National Yogurt Association
Criteria. And then, it -- you have this paragraph you
read, with the reference to the C.F.R., and so on.
And then it says, underneath, in order to
meet these criteria, you have to satisfy these
requirements, which implies to me that what they're
saying is, if you satisfy these requirements, as far
as we're concerned, you've met these -- these
criteria; even though, in reality, you're telling me
you don,t necessarily.
TEE WITNESS:
don't.
It could very well be that you
THE COURT: But, by their standards, you do.
(212) 349-9692 TABOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
4O8
299
| THE WITNESS: That's correct.
2 THE COURT: Okay.
3 BY MR. DAVIS:
4 Q Just for clarification purposes, and I'm not
5 sure I'm clear on this.
6 Are you saying, Professor, that you can have
7 an article that is considered "yogurt" or "frozen
8 yogurt," under the NYA criteria, even if, in fact, it
9 doesn't meet all elements of the criteria enunciated
10 in this document?
1] A All I intimated was that there is no
12 policing of these standards. It's -- it's the
13 integrity of the manufacturer that requires them to
14 be, first and foremost, with honesty.
]5 Q Right. But, the Association, the industry
16 association, in fact, requires products to meet these
17 standards in order for them to be categorized as
|8 "yogurt" or "frozen yogurt. _
19 Is that correct?
20 A That's correct.
21 Q Okay.
22 THE COURT: Now, I'm not going to leave it
23 there, Mr. Davis. I'm not, because I have to decide
24 this thing correctly.
25 Again, the way I understood your testimony,
(212) 349-9692 TAI_O0fl lflgPOITXHS CO_Kl_f (516) 741-5235
-. 409
300
] Professor, you have the listing of criteria, but
2 underneath is that four-part test. And, what I got
3 from you was that the Yogurt Association, not you, as
4 an expert, but the Yogurt Association seems to say
5 that if you meet this four-part test, as far as
6 they're concerned, you've satisfied the criteria
7 above, even though, in reality, you may well not. Or,
8 in reality, according to you.
9 THE WI_ESS: If you -- well, I -- I
]0 indicated integrity on the part of the manufacturer.
|I THE COURT: Right, but --
12 THE WITNESS: And that's -- that is --
13 that's first and foremost. If they're -- if they're
14 going to lie, --
15 THE COURT: Okay, oh, I understand that.
16 But, I'm saying if somebody files a report which truly
17 says I meet these four criteria, according to the
18 National Yogurt Association, you've met our criteria,
19 even though you may not, really, because you may not
20 be using entirely live cultured solids.
21 THE WITNESS: Your Honor, there's a --
22 there's a --
23 THE COURT: That's my problem here.
24 THE WITNESS: -- there's an initial mandate
25 --
(212) 349-9692 I',_I'_OOB PJIPORTI"_G CO)_A_'r (516) 741-5235
410
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
301
"_IE COURT: Um l'mLm.
THE WITNESS: -- that all milk solids be
fermented. And, following that, if you meet the four
parts below -- the correct culture organisms, the
correct population, and so forth -- then you've
complied with their requirement. You must have -- you
must fulfill one through four, yes. But, you must
start with all milk solids being fermented.
THE COURT: How do you get that? Because,
that seems different than what you told me a few
minutes ago. Okay? It seemed to me that we were in
agreement that some people --
THE WITNESS:
THE COURT:
THE WITNESS:
manufacturer.
THE COURT:
Well, I indicated it was --
-- could meet the --
-- the integrity of the
But before that, before Mr.
Davis brought that out, --
THE WITNESS: Yes.
THE COURT: -- what you seemed to be saying
was the first two paragraphs, we went through, are the
criteria. And then it says, in order to meet these
criteria, here's what you need to do.
THE WITNESS: Okay.
THE COURT: Here is the --
(212) 349-9692 TAN'KOO8 R_PORT'rMO CM,%tqY (516) 741-5._35
411 . _ __
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
302
THE WITNESS: But, in addition to the
criteria, the initial criteria, fermenting everything,
THE COURT:
THE WITNESS:
THE COURT:
But -- but, it doesn't say that
-- then you've got to do this.
But, it doesn't say that, and I
need to know this.
criteria.
criteria.
Okay? You know, I --
THE WITNESS: I'm -- I'm sorry that I --
THE COURT: It says, in order to meet these
It doesn't say in addition to these
You know, I'm going to have to interpret
this thing, as a document, you know, in -- in line
with the common English usage.
THE WITNESS: Okay.
THE COURT: So, when I -- when I read this,
the way I look at it, it seems to me -- and this is
why I was asking about it -- it seems to me it says in
order to meet these criteria above, here's what you
need to do for tests.
THE WITNESS: But, it further states, beyond
meeting the criteria, that live and active culture
yogurt must satisfy each of these requirements. And,
the only way that you get live and active culture
(212) 349-9692 TARK00S REPORTING CONPANT (516} 741-5235
412 .... -q"
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
303
yogurt is to fulfill the first sentence. Live and
active culture yogurt --
THE COURT: Okay, where does it say that in
yogurt --
THE WITNESS: -- refrigerated cup and frozen
THE COURT: Okay, but where does it say that
in that four-part test? That's my -- my problem.
THE WITNESS: Well, it -- it leads you to
the four-part test if you have live and active culture
yogurt.
THE COURT: Okay. I see what you're saying.
Okay.
THE WITNESS: If -- if you have -- if you
have fulfilled --
THE COURT: So, it's not live and active
culture yogurt unless it meets these other criteria is
what you're telling me.
THE WITNESS: You must start correctly to
gain that position.
THE COURT: Okay, okay. I may be dense, but
it's -- it's sinking in.
THE WITNESS: No, you're not, sir.
THE COURT: Okay. I understand what you're
saying. And, let me just take a look at it.
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS RRPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
413 ..
304
l THE WITNESS : It 's the inability of the
2 professor to get the message across. That's all.
3 [Laughter]
4 THE COURT: Okay, I've got -- I've got what
5 you're saying. So, the phrase "live and active
6 culture yogurt" is a predicate to anything else that
7 -- in these tests.
8 THE WITNESS : Yes.
9 THE COURT: Gotcha. Okay, thank you.
I0 You've just clarified something for me.
I| THE WITNESS: Thank you.
12 BY MR. DAVIS :
13 Q Now, do you remember the breakout of the
14 yogurt portion? You had a -- a frozen yogurt base
15 that was mixed with an ice milk base?
16 A Correct.
17 Q Now, the final product from that side was
]8 the frozen yogurt core.
19 Do you recollect that?
20 A Yes.
21 Q Now, if you take a look at one, the first
22 criteria on that page of the NYA Criteria for Live and
23 Active Culture Yogurt, --
24 A We're still on Page 7.
25 Q Yes.
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS EWPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
414
305
| A Your Page 7.
2 O My Page 7. It says the product must be
3 fermented with both -- I can't even pronounce it, so
4 let's just say the -- the yogurt cultures --
5 A Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies
6 bulgaricus and streptococcus thermophilus.
7 Q All right. Now, the product being the
8 frozen yogurt core, was that product fermented with
9 both of these cultures?
I0 A According to the documents, these two
I| cultures -- according to the documents submitted by
12 Haagen-Dazs, that I reviewed, both of these organisms
13 were used in their culture to ferment yogurt. However
14 -- or ferment the milk base to produce yogurt.
15 However, that represented twelve percent of the
16 composite.
17 Q So, if the product is the frozen yogurt
18 core, was that entire core -- not just the twelve
19 percent -- was that entire core fermented with both of
20 these cultures?
21 A No, it was not.
22 Q All right.
23 Now, other than this requirement for
24 fermenting the entire dairy base, are there any other
25 bases, looking at these criteria, for your opinion
(212) 349-g692 TAJ_K00S 2.1_ORTIMO COJItTKN31" (516) 741-5235
415 ....
306
1 that the importation is not yogurt?
2 A They have to have a population of organisms
3 that's -- that meets their standard. And, that's ten
4 raised to the seventh power, or ten million organisms
5 or colony forming units per gram of yogurt finished.
6 Q Has Pillsbury or Haagen-Dazs demonstrated
7 this -- meeting this criteria for the importations in
8 this case?
9 THE COURT: I'm sorry. I didn,t catch the
]0 last --
II Q All right. Has Pillsbury or Haagen-Dazs
12 demonstrated meeting this criteria for the
13 importations in this case?
14 A No, they have not, --
15 Q And, what do you --
]6 A -- to the best of my knowledge, because we
17 have seen no quality assurance documents whatsoever.
18 (Pause)
]9 Q Now, if yOU take a look at Number 3 on that
20 page, beginning with =the cultures must be active at
21 the end of the stated shelf life as determined by the
22 activity test described in the sampling and analytical
23 procedures."
24 If you could, read that to yourself, and
25 tell me if they have met that requirement.
(212) 349-9692 TANEOOB RZPORTINO COMPA]_ "(516) 741-5235
416 _ __
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
not .
A
307
(Witness perusing document)
To the best of my knowledge, no, they have
Q And what do you base that on?
A We have seen no quality assurance documents.
Q Now, finally, the fourth criteria, "in the
case of frozen yogurt," --
THE COURT: Wait. Let me interrupt again.
The -- the report, the lab report, internal
lab-type report that was signed -- you know what I'm
referring to in the record, do you not?
THE WITNESS :
That 's the one?
THE COURT :
There was one done in 1995.
Right, right. Did -- did that
constitute an attempt to satisfy this four-part test?
You know, you say there is no quality assurance
documents. I'm -- I'm curious whether you -- you're
THE WITNESS: Well, this -- this was --
THE COURT: -- including that.
THE WITNESS: -- this was done back in 1995,
and we don't know that that represents -- and, it was
done in a plant in the United States, not done in a --
with product made in Canada.
THE COURT: But, would that be a quality
(212) 349-9692 TJt]RKO05 IUBP02TZNG C0tMI_&N'Y (516) 741-5235
417 .....
308
| assurance document? You know, if there was one of
2 those for each batch, or --
3 THE WITNESS: Well, if it is, it's done
4 wrong.
5 THE COURT: Okay.
6 THE WITNESS: Okay? This was -- that
7 document showed that the activity test, and they were
8 trying, I believe, to show ten to the seventh --
9 THE COURT: Um hmm.
|0 THE WITNESS: -- organisms.
lJ THE COURT: That's what sticks in my mind.
12 THE WITNESS: This is an activity test, or
|3 that type of test, rather, should have been applied to
14 see if they got one log or ten-fold increase in
15 population at the end of the shelf life of that
16 product.
17 THE COURT: I see.
18 THE WITNESS: At the pull date.
]9 THE COURT: And, that's a --
20 THE WITNESS: And, they did it --
21 THE COURT: That says it's alive and
22 kicking, or --
23 THE WITNESS: Yes, yes. And, --
24 THE COURT: -- or whatever they do.
25 THE WITNESS: -- they did it, if I recall,
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
418
309
] four months -- four months, somewhere in that range,
2 time range.
3 BY MR. DAVIS:
4 Q What is the effect of doing this test -- or
5 performing this test on a product that was not at the
6 end of the shelf life? What is the importance of the
7 end of the shelf life??
8 A Well, because -- because of the storage
9 conditions under which these frozen yogurt bars are
]0 held, you -- you have freezing and thawing going on.
I| They're held in a freezer, obviously. And, many
12 freezers, unless it's -- unless it's a large
13 commercial freezer, many of these freezers are -- are
14 virtual torture chambers, rather than freezers,
15 because they -- they thaw every night, or they thaw
16 multiple times during a twenty-four hour interval.
17 A_d, every time that happens, the air warms
18 up, the product loses ice crystals. The only place
19 you make ice crystals in a frozen product is in that
20 mechanical freezer that scrapes ice off the barrel, if
21 you will, as it passes from the back side to the front
22 side. Every place else beyond that point, you make
23 ice crystals larger.
24 And, this is why your -- your ice cream that
25 you keep in your home freezer, if you -- if you leave
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTZHG COMPANY (516) 741-5235
419 _ __.
310
[ a half gallon in there for a short period of time, and
2 then open the lid, it looks like a -- millions of ice
3 crystals on top. A/Id, that's because of the
4 freeze/thaw phenomenon. You only re-freeze to
5 existing ice crystals. And, those ice crystals get
6 bigger and bigger.
7 And, the bigger they get, the more injurious
8 they are to bacteria, and particularly the rod-shaped
9 bacteria, which represents half the population, and
10 the lactobacilli are rod-shaped bacteria, and they
11 will be lysed by ice crystals.
12 Q So, what is the intent of this section of
13 the test criteria, of having it at the end of the
]4 shelf life?
]5 A Well, it's -- it's a two-fold test. Number
16 one, the -- the test shows that the product has been
17 stored correctly. And, number two, it's -- it's a
18 test to show that you still have some live bacteria.
19 Q Now, the final criteria was, "In the case of
20 frozen yogurt, the product shall have a total
21 titratable acidity expressed as a lactic acid of at
22 least zero-point-three percent at all times. At least
23 zero-point-one-five percent of the total acidity must
24 be obtained by fermentation. This is confirmed by
25 demonstrating the presence of both D and L forms of
(212) 249-9692 TARKOO8 REPORTING C_ART (516) 741-5235
420 . _ __
311
I lactic acid."
2 In your opinion, did Pillsbury demonstrate
3 meeting this criteria?
4 A I haven't seen any documentation.
5 Q Have you performed any calculations
6 yourself, using their documentation, that would
7 indicate to you that they have not met the criteria?
8 A I attempted to do some calculations that
9 show what the initial acidity is in their product, and
10 what they might have, if they went beyond that point,
|] by adding their flavor concentrate. Yes, I have.
12 Q And, what did your calculations show?
13 A Well, we have to go back. We have to go
]4 back to the term "apparent acidity." And, it is well
15 known in the dairy industry that milk has an acidity.
|6 However, there is no acid present.
17 There are components of milk which give a
18 value to your titration, when you use the standard
19 technique. And those components are carbon dioxide,
20 the proteins, the milk proteins, the whey proteins,
21 and casein, and two salts -- the citrates and the
22 phosphates. Those all contribute to give you point-
23 one-five to point-one-eight percent titratable acidity
24 expressed as lactic per gram of product.
25 Q And, what do you base those figures on? The
(212} 349-9692 TAHKOOS RRPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
421 __ __.
312
! point-one-five to point-one-eight?
2 A What do I base them on?
3 Q Yes.
4 A This is -- this is common knowledge in the
5 industry, and a very notable textbook by Hugo Sommer,
6 S-O-M-M-E-R, illustrates that very, very well.
7 Q Now, taking into account the apparent
8 acidity of the milk products, the basic milk products,
9 in your opinion, has Pillsbury shown that the
10 fermentation process of -- I'm sorry, that point-
I] fifteen percent of the total acidity was, in fact,
]2 obtained by fermentation, rather than by apparent
13 acidity?
14 A Well, we've -- we've seen no quality
[5 assurance documentation. If -- if they were going to
[6 prove that point-one-five percent were a part of their
17 finished product, they would have had to do an initial
18 titration before the culture was added -- excuse me.
]9 They would have had to do an initial titration on the
20 ice milk base, as they call it, and then they would
21 have to do a final titration on the flavor
22 concentrate, and a final titration on the finished
23 blended frozen yogurt mix.
24 Q Their standards state that they are looking
25 for point-three percent to point-four percent
(212) 349-9692 TANK00S REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
422 __ __
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
titratable acidity in the final product.
Is that correct?
A
O
313
That's correct.
Given the apparent acidity that's present in
dairy product -- in milk products, would that -- they
achieved point-three percent titratable acidity.
Would they have, in fact, obtained at least point-
8 fifteen percent of total acidity by fermentation?
9 A From -- from my calculations, and I've got
I0 them written over there, but I think I can do it from
11 memory, the ti_ratable acidity in their product, from
12 the apparent acidity viewpoint, varies between point-
]3 two and point-two-flve, depending upon whether you use
]4 point-one-five or point-one-eight as your reference to
]5 apparent acidity.
16 And, consequently, if you use -- if you used
17 point-two-five, for example, that exceeds their limit
18 of point-four on titration. They -- in their
19 specifications, they want the finished product, if I
20 recall correctly, to be between point-three and point-
2] four titratable acidity.
22 If -- if you use point-one-eight to develop
23 the apparent acidity calculation, based on the milk
24 products that are in there, you will determine that
25 that apparent acidity is point-two-five. And then,
(2'12) 349-9692 TAN'ICOOS R.BPORT't'NO COMP,I&.MY (516) 741-5235
423
314
1 point-one-five on top of that gets them to the point-
2 four or slightly above.
3 Q But, if they're meeting point-three, would
4 it mean that the apparent acidity is such, meant that
5 less than point-one-five titratable acidity was
6 achieved by fermentation?
7 A That's correct.
8 Q Is there any data to show which part of the
9 range the frozen yogurt core met? Whether it was the
I0 point-three or point-four?
II A I have seen no evidence.
12 THE COURT: What did that report we
13 discussed earlier indicate? DO you recall?
]4 (Pause]
15 THE COURT: I can dig it out for you.
16 THE WITNESS: That -- yes. I -- I can
17 recall it, because I was -- from a research point of
18 view, I didn't like the way it was written.
19 What they did -- what they did in there was
20 determine the total plate count of their yogurt,
21 several flavors of it, using three different culturing
22 mediums, and these are growth media to allow -- it's
23 food for the bacteria to grow on.
24 THE COURT: Right.
25 THE WITNESS: And, they do it in a -- in a
(212) 349-9692 TAN'KOOJgB.EPOIV.TINGCOl(PANT (516) 741-5,235
424
315
! petri dish, and so forth.
2 Depending upon the media used, the ranges
3 were ten to the sixth, ten to the seventh organisms.
4 And then, they incubated for four hours and -- and did
5 the plating again. And, essentially, they looked like
6 they all went up one log cycle, but the test was done
7 at four months, instead of expiration date, which I
8 believe Mr. Sweet said was one year.
9 (Pause)
]0 BY MR. DAVIS:
I| Q Based upon your review of the development,
12 production, processing, and marketing materials
13 provided by Haagen-Dazs, do you have an opinion
14 regarding which component provides the essential
]5 character of these dessert bases?
16 A Yes, I do.
]7 Q What is your opinion?
18 A It's the frozen yogurt that supplies the
19 essential character.
20 Q And, what are the bases for your opinion?
21 A Well, it has the highest concentration of
22 solids. Therefore, it's in predominance, from a
23 solids basis, in that yogurt.
24 Q Why do you consider the solids comparison to
25 be critical?
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
425
316
1 A It's the common ground for any calculation
2 used in the dairy industry. Because water is a
3 diluent, and -- and, as a diluent, it could be more or
4 less. And, the only common ground is solids.
5 Q Have you done comparisons between dairy
6 products and ingredients?
7 A I'm sorry?
8 Q Have you, in the course of your professional
9 life, performed comparisons between dairy products and
I0 dairy ingredients?
1] A Yes.
]2 Q How long have you done these types of
13 comparisons?
14 A If -- if we're speaking of -- of -- I guess
]5 I'm -- I'll ask for clarification on that, because I
]6 -- I want to know where you're directing your
17 thoughts.
]8 0 Well, have you done comparisons using solids
19 as the basis for the comparison?
20 A Yes, I have.
21 Q How long have you performed those types of
22 comparisons?
23 A How have I?
24 Q How long have you performed those types of
25 comparisons? For how many years?
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
426
317
1 A I've -- I've been at the University for
2 thirty-seven years, and I'm still doing it, even in
3 retirement. I have discussions with industry people,
4 and the common ground, when you talk about a product
5 is what's its composition, and composition is always
6 solids. Even in the C.F.R., when you look at the
7 definition for -- for milk, for example, it will tell
8 you three -- minimum, three and quarter percent
9 milkfat, eight and quarter percent milk solids, not
10 fat. Those are, combined together, total solids.
|| It,s the common ground.
]2 Q Other than the comparison of the solids
13 content, were there any other criteria that were a
14 basis for opinion that the frozen yogurt portion of
15 the bar constitutes the essential character of the
16 bar?
]7 A Well, people -- people eat food for -- or
18 eat -- yeah, they eat food for -- for nutrition. And,
]9 the milk component, the frozen yogurt component, is
20 the most nutritious component there.
2| (Pause)
22 THE COURT: I just want to interject,
23 Professor, that I think you're absolutely right on
24 there. I've never eaten a pint of Haagen-Dazs when it
25 wasn't for nutrition.
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
427
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
318
[Laughter]
MR. DAVIS: Was that the ice cream or the
frozen yogurt, Your Honor?
[Laughter]
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q Based upon your examination of the
Haagen-Dazs documents, generally speaking, how did
Haagen-Dazs characterize -- categorize these bars
during the development of the bars and the subsequent
periods?
A All of the documentation that I have seen,
except for four, maybe five pieces of paper, indicate
that this product is a frozen yogurt.
(Counsel conferring with Court Clerk)
Q Now, in the most recent packaging that was
provided by Haagen-Dazs, --
MR. DAVIS: May I approach the witness, Your
Honor?
THE COURT: YOU may.
MR. DAVIS: Thank you.
BY MR. DAVIS:
Q It described -- the term sorbet and yogurt
is on the box, but then, in the right-hand corner is a
description "fat-free vanilla frozen yogurt bar coated
with raspberry sorbet."
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS RHIPORT'rN(3 COMPANY (53.6) 741-5235
428 _ __
319
I Do you see that?
2 A Yes.
3 Q Now, is that type of description uncommon in
4 the frozen dessert industry? Or is it a common type
5 of description?
6 A Are you referring to the principal display
7 panel, or the upper right corner?
8 Q The upper right corner.
9 A In -- in today's NLEA atmosphere (pause) --
|0 nutrition -- nutritional education -- NL -- oh, wait a
]I minute. Nutritional --
]2 MR. PETERSON: Do you mean to refer to the
]3 Nutrition Labeling Education --
]4 A -- Labeling and Education Act. I knew --
15 stumbling over it. Thank you.
16 Nutritional Labeling and Education Act.
17 They want to make it abundantly clear what is in that
]8 box. And, the upper right corner portrays that very
]9 nicely.
20 Q Now, have you seen this type of description
2] on other dairy products, such as ice cream? Ice cream
22 bars and things of that nature?
23 A
24 chocolate,
25 Q
Ice cream bars, ice cream bars coated with
or something along that line?
Yes.
(212) 349-9592 TA.W1_OOS R_ORTIliO COKPA.WY (516) 741-5235
429
320
] A Yes.
2 Q In your opinion, in that type of product,
3 what is the essence of the bar?
4 A [No response]
5 Q Is it the ice crea2u or the coating?
6 A It's the ice cream.
7 Q Jhnd, in your opinion, what is the essence of
8 the frozen yogurt bars, dessert bars in this case? Is
9 it the yogurt portion, frozen yogurt portion? Or is
10 it the coating?
]| A The frozen yogurt portion is the principal
]2 element.
13 (Pause)
]4 Q In ice cream or frozen yogurt dessert
]5 marketing and production, when the term "flavor" is
|6 used, what is that usually intended to connote?
]7 A When the term "flavor" --
]8 Q "Flavor" is used.
19 (Pause)
20 A It means the -- the flavor which you can
2] expect when you eat the product.
22 Q Does it -- does the flavor, per se, describe
23 the essence of the product?
24 A Does the flavor describe the?
25 Q Essence of the product.
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO8 REPORTING COMP,%N1[ (516) 741-5335
430
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
321
A It describes what you can -- what you will
perceive, when you eat the product, from a flavor
characteristic.
Q Now, if I have a -- a chocolate ice cream,
and I put an awful lot of cocoa in the ice cream to
get that chocolate flavor, is the essence of the
product the chocolate flavor, or is it the ice cream?
A I guess I would like to know how you're --
you're dealin 9 with the term "essence."
Q All right. Is the essential character of
the product the ice cream or the flavoring?
A It's -- the essential -- the essential
character of the product is the ice cream, and it can
be flavored whatever.
Q Okay. Now, are there a variety of different
ingredients that are used to flavor ice creams and
frozen yogurts?
A Yes.
flavors.
0
cream portion itself.
Is that correct?
A
0
A
Incredibly high numbers of different
And, many of the flavors are in the ice
[No response]
They're mixed together with the ice cream?
Yes.
(212) 349-9692 TANKOO5 ]KI_ORTXNO COMPANY (516) 74:1-5235
431
322
I Q Does the fact that it -- that ice creanLs
2 have a variety of flavors, or very expensive flavors,
3 or unique flavors, change the character of the article
4 from something that's ice cream into something that's
5 not ice cream?
6 A Ice cream is -- ice cream is ice cream,
7 regardless of the flavor.
8 Q Should it make any difference whether ice
9 cream is ice cream, whether the flavor is mixed in
10 with the ice cream or it's a coating on the ice cream?
II A It doesn't make any difference.
12 Q Would the same be true, with regard to
13 frozen yogurt desserts?
14 A That's -- that's the principal element in
15 there is frozen yogurt, whether it's -- whether it's
16 vanilla frozen yogurt, or strawberry frozen yogurt, or
17 cherry frozen yogurt, it's still frozen yogurt.
18 Q And, does it make a difference what the
19 coating is? Does that take it out of being a frozen
20 yogurt?
21 A The -- the coating is -- is -- well, as we
22 described with -- that provides some flavor, but
23 that's -- that's -- and, it may even provide some
24 crunch, depending upon what it is, but that's --
25 that's it.
(212) 349-9692 TANI_OOfl RBPORTINO COMPANY (516) 741-5235
432 .....
348
I Q Would the frozen yogurt core be a product
2 whose starting point was whole milk or skim milk?
3 A Yes, sir.
4 Q Would the frozen yogurt core of these bars
5 -- I'm sorry. Withdrawn.
6 Would whole milk or skim milk be used for
7 making the frozen yogurt core?
8 A With -- with the formulation that
9 Haagen-Dazs has, that I reviewed, you could use -- you
|0 could use skim milk instead of -- instead of water.
11 But, you have to make an accounting for the solids
12 contributed by that skim milk. And it -- and it makes
13 the manufacture a little bit more difficult, because
14 now you've got another ingredient that you've got to
15 keep on inventory, and keep under control, because it
16 will spoil.
17 Q were the -- was the frozen yogurt core made,
18 in part, from two varieties of skim milk? Lactose-
19 reduced skim milk and condensed skim milk?
20 A Yes -- yes, it was made from -- well,
21 actually -- actually --
22 Q
23 A
24 Q
25 A
Three.
-- three.
Right.
If -- if you want to call the yogurt
(21.2) 349-9692 TANKOOB EEPOETING COMPANY (5_6) 741-5235
458
7
8
9
I0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
349
flavoring element made with condensed skim independent
from the blend of -- of lactose-reduced skim milk and
condensed skim.
Q Now, can you get condensed skim milk or
lactose-reduced skim milk, or the blend, without
having whole milk someplace down the line, as a
starting point?
A No.
Q Would the same be true with a fully cultured
yogurt? Somewhere down the line, you have to have
whole milk to make that fully cultured yogurt.
A Yes, sir. Your starting point is going to
be a raw milk, which -- which is -- well, if it's got
more than three and a half percent fat, then it --
then, it fulfills the definition for whole milk.
(Pause)
THE COURT: Does raw milk ever fall below
that?
THE WITNESS: Yes. In fact, in the standard
of identity allowed by the State of Wisconsin, raw
milk can be as low as three percent. But, the -- the
federal standard is -- is three and a quarter.
We had -- several years ago, we -- three,
four years ago, we had a drought in Wisconsin, and we
had very poor feed for the dairy cattle as an end
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COHPANT (516) 741-5235
459
377
! named in Additional U.S. Note 1 to Chapter 4 is
2 significant and provides the character to the -- the
3 dairy character to the whole article? Would -- is
4 that a correct restatement of what you said?
5 A Yes, that's close.
6 Q All right. Now, what do you use -- what
7 factors does Customs use to determine whether the
8 dairy component is significant and provides the
9 character of the finished article?
l0 A Well, what I think we would try to do is to
II -- is to get an idea of how much milk solids are in
12 the product, to -- to give us an idea of how much milk
13 would have been added, that was required to _ke the
14 product. And -- and then, consider if there's a -- if
15 there's a non-dairy component in the product, does the
16 dairy component impart a dairy character to the
]7 product as a whole.
]8 Q Do you have an example of a -- of a ruling
]9 that discusses the use of the milk solids portion as a
20 criteria for determining the importance of the dairy
2] component?
22 A I -- I have a ruling. It's -- it's not on
23 an article in Heading 2105. It's on a -- a beverage
24 item.
25 Now, there is a similarity, I think it could
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPJ&NY (516) 741-5235
487
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
38O
THE COURT: You may.
MR. DAVIS: Thank you.
MR. PETERSON: Do you have a copy for us?
MR. DAVIS: No.
(Counsel conferring)
MR. DAVIS: I'm sorry. I should have done
that.
MR. PETERSON: No, no,
electronically, I'm sure.
MR. DAVIS: I'm sorry.
[inaudible] My apologies.
I have it
I should have
Honor?
May I go off the record for a moment, Your
THE COURT: Sure.
(Whereupon, a brief recess was taken.)
THE WITNESS: Heading, I believe, is the
second paragraph under the title "issue."
Subheading 2202.90.2000 HTSUS applies to
milk-based drinks. In classifying beverages under
this provision, consideration is given to the amount
and significance of the milk content present. Since
skim milk contains about nine percent milk solids,
beverages which contain over five percent milk solids
are considered to have an appreciable amount of milk,
enough to impart the drink's essential character in
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOB REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
490 ....
381
I many instances. The amounts of water, sweeteners, and
2 flavors present in these beverages are, of course,
3 common to most beverages of this type, so it is
4 believed that the milk content, which is of the
5 highest percentage next to the water and sweeteners,
6 that imparts the individual character to these
7 products.
8 BY MR. DAVIS:
9 Q Now, has Customs, in 2105 rulings and in
|0 rulings involving dairy products combined with other
]I products, used the milk solids criteria?
12 A Yes, they have.
13 Q Have they used it consistently, to your
14 experience?
15 A Yes, I believe so.
]6 Q And, what is, generally speaking, the cut-
17 off point that Customs has used --
18 A It --
19 Q -- for milk solids?
20 A It appears to be five percent or so, in --
21 O And, - -
22 A -- and --
23 MR. PETERSON: Your Honor, I'm -- I'm going
24 to object on grounds of relevance here. I mean, the
25 ruling that the witness has referred to involves
(212) 349-9692 TARKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
491 . _
382
] different tariff classification provisions, and it
2 doesn't even involve the same chapter of the tariff
3 that we're dealing with here. And, there has been no
4 connection made between the test of classification
5 under Chapter 22 with the classification of a product
6 under Chapter 21, which is what we're involved with
7 here.
8 THE COURT: Well, I'm going to let him do
9 it, because this is -- this is supposedly Customs'
|0 reasoning in reaching this decision.
|| But, I find it bothersome that the
]2 Defendant's witness doesn't know what Customs'
]3 reasoning was in reaching this decision. He is
14 providing his knowledgeable speculation, and I'm going
15 to let him provide that knowledgeable speculation,
16 because I think it -- it's relevant, to the extent
17 that that's the process they used.
18 On the other hand, the weight I give it is
19 going to be affected by his inability to tell me that
20 that's what they actually did.
2] MR. DAVIS: I understand, Your Honor.
22 THE COURT: So, your objection is overruled.
23 You may proceed.
24 MR. DAVIS: I understand, Your Honor.
25 BY MR. DAVIS:
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMP&NT (516) 741-5235
492
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
383
Q Have you read the Customs Ruling in this
case, involving this merchandise?
A Yes, I have.
Q Do you have that ruling?
A No, I don't.
(Pause)
Q Do you remember if they used a solids base
as the cut-off point?
A I -- to my best of my recollection, that the
-- there wasn't a rationale given in that ruling.
It's -- I have to say it's been a little while since
I've looked at it, but I don't recall that.
Has Customs applied this solids base cut-offQ
point - -
A
Q
Yes, it has.
-- to merchandise that was actually
classified in the quota provisions in 21057
A Yes, it has.
Q Has it done so consistently?
A I believe so.
Q Has it done so both in Headquarters and New
York rulings?
A I have some rulings. Do you mind if I look
at them?
THE COURT: You can go ahead.
(212) 349-9692 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY (516) 741-5235
493
Sampling And Analytical Procedures
The app!Jcant should submit sample.% one each representing e single line ofproduct. =deally _aV.en from the begi_r_to9, middle and er_d of a manufacturing rut_that dsmonsbates tibet tt_e yogurt nee mat the standard. The samples will beanalyzed according to the following procedures:
Refr kjetated Yogurt
a. Total viable yogurt counts w_ll be enumerated by th_ attached ID_
procedure. Tl_e total viable count will be repelled on the NYA "Laboratory
Report Form." The total vrable count is the sum of colony forming un_ of
Streptococ;cu._ thermopnilus and LactobacllJus delbrueckii ,uosp.
bulgaricus oar gram of t_e Droduc_,
b. At the end of the stale0 shelf lile designated by 1he applicant, activity of the
culture will be reported for at least two of the three random _amples on the
NYA"Lsboratory Repor_ Porto."
The activity te_! is corned out by pasteurizing 12% 5ol_ds non-fat dry milk at
92"C (lea°F) for seven minutes, cooJit_gto 110°F, addlog 3% inoculum of
the meterlal under test and fermentm_ at 110°F for four houm. The total
yogurt organisms in the inoculated milk subr, trote are to be enumerated
both before a_d afte: fermentation by _OF me_ho_o_eg_
The activity test wl] be reported as log increase in yogurt organisms
(CFLJIg) following fermentation of the defined substrata under the standard
condition at the end of the stated shell li_E.
Frozen Yogurt
a. The _bgtable ac_di_ ol sample's, one each reoresen'0ng beginnint;, midOle
and and at"a manufacturzng run w_lr be determi_e_ as per enclosed IO_'
pfocedurc and reposed on the NYA "Laboratory Report Form " In add_tlot_.
tl'e epl_icant mu_ certify that at least 0.15% t_trateble acidity in the product
was derived flora yogurt fermentation
b. Total viable yogurt cw,nts will be enumerateo by the attached I DF
i_ocedure. The 1oral viable count wifl _ reported on the NYA "Laboratory
Repot1 Form." Tr_e "_otal viable count is the sum of colony forming un_ of
5treptoooocus thermophllus end Lactobaciilus delbrueckii subsp
d?ht_p://w'o_w,aboutyogurt.com/industryAndRe_ources/la¢S ampling.asp
_O'd 9161 _9_ _T_ 33[_d0 3GULL 71NI /OGS_
655
0
bulgladcus per gram of the product.
At the end of the stated shelf hfe designat¢d by the apDIrcant, act_lty of the
culture wiI_be rap0ned for _t leas_ two of '_he_ree rsn_Om _amples on the
NYA "Laboratory Report Form."
The activity test is carried out _y pasteurizing 12% so]iUs non-fat dry milk
92*C (190=F} for seven minutes, cooling to 110°F, adding 3% Jnoculum of
the mater_al under test and fermen_ng st 110°F for four hours. The total
yogurt organisms in t_e inoculated miIR subsfr_te are to be enumerated
both before and after termenzatlon by IDF methodology.
The a_vity will be reoortec:l as Log increase in yogurt _roanisms (CFU/g)
following fermentat/on of the defined substrate under the standard
condtbons at the enO of the stated _helf life
http:Hwww, abouty ogurt.com/industryAa]dResources/lacSampling.asp
£_'d 9_E_; !79e E_E 3314_0 30_± -I.LNI J'O,--..
656
National Yogurt Association Seal Application RulesAnd Procedures
Home
The tollow_ng sets forth the rules and procedures for o_ining permi_,_ion to usethe Nat_onal YoguE Association (NYA)'Seal for refngerated cup and/or frozenyogurt products containing live anU active cultures. The rules and procedures maybe modified from t;me to brae by the NYA Board of Directors.
ELIGI_,_LITY
A. Any company which produces and/or distributes yogurt
(refrigerated cup and/or frozen) in _i_e Umted States, wi_ether or not
a member of the NYA, may apply to use the NYA Seal on proOuct
labels or m labeling or adve_sing.
I_. A separate applicat=on must be submitted for each product for
wNch usa of the NYA Sea( essought. Fee purposes st this program.
"product" Is defined of, e branO of yogurt of a t:_rticular tyl:_ or form
including an aggre_a1!on at d¢fferent flavors of a ty_e of term By
way of example, each of the foltow_ng msCOnsidered a separate
proGuct.
• nonfat yogurt - fruit on the bottom (all flavors)
• Iowfet yogurt • f=uil on 1he botlom (all flavors)
• Cu_rd style yogu_l (_1 flavom)
• Iowfat #ozen yogurt {all flavors)
Yogurt sweetened w=th aspartame (or any olher s=milar sweetener)
and yogurt sweetened w_th a nuttitbe sweelener, such as sucrose,
also are considered separate products
C, If a company subm=ts tes_ results for the same product, as de_nwd
in Secbon I B., that is so|d under more that one brand name, the
application must contain a I_stof all the brand names under which
_he product is sold.
D. A Company whmh wishes to apply to use the Seal must su_'nff a
signed application form with the specified infor:natJon and fee, to
the National Yogurt h,ssooiation, 2000 Corporate Ridge, Suite 1000,
McLean, VA 22102-7805, ATTN: Seal Program
Applicetinns must be accompanied by the fee speeifie_ in Section
II.A,
E.
FEES
A comoany which prodL_ces and(o_ distributes yogurl product_ may
apply to use the Seal at a cost of $2,500 per applica_on So, for
http,I/www.aboutyogurt, comlindustry AndResourcesllacSealRules.asp
_'O"a 9_6_ I_9__$_ 3D[d_O 3(IWWi71NI £0 ....
656A
example, if a company wants to use the Seal on four d;fferent types
o1 yogu_ products (as defined in I._.) the total fee would be
$_ O,000 The fee, which is non-refundable, IS for the sole purpose
of offsetting the costs of the adm)nietration of the pro0ram.
B The dues of Voting Members of the NYA include funcls to cover
ten aDplicabons per calendar year, The dues of Active Nonvoting
Members of the NYA inc.Judafunds to cover five apphca_ons bar
calendar year Ad_bonal 8ppJICet]Dns must be accompan}ed by the
fee set tenh m paragraph A
Ill CONTENT OF APPLICATIOI_
An al_ica_on shall consist of the following:
1. A completed and signed Application Form for each type of yogurt
product on which the requester intends to use the Seal
2. "The results of the analytical tesl_ (conducted in accord=nee with
_e p|Gtocol set forth in A!_pendix B, including full reports of
analytmal procedures, Signed worksheets, etc.) which establish the
presence of live and active yogurt cultures in the procluct The
analytical tests must be conducted at independent leborateries (mat
is, not in the laboratories Of 1he compar_y which is spaying to use
the Seal) A ttst of independem laboratories know_ to be
expenenced in conduclJng tests m aCCOrdanCe with the reQuisite
protocols is found _n Appendix C. Other laboratories may be equally
qualified to pedorm t_e analy_cal work.
3. A check payable to the NYA for the appropriate fee, i_ a f_ is
required. See Sec_on II of this document.
IV. TEST PROTOCOLS
A The company shall provide to the independent laboratory it has
selected three sarnl_les for the "activity" test and three saml_es for
the "culture" test. The samples shall be randomly selected ffern 1he
begmnthg, middle and end of ==i_tocuction run. The independent
laboratory shall analyze two (2} of those _emples to determine if
they meet the ectwity anti cuiturt9 level requirements speclfieo in
Appendix B.
B. If both samples pnss the a_ivffy end cu_ure tests, _he product
satisfi¢_ the requirements for use of the Seal.
C If one of the two samples do_ not pass the a_vity and/or culture
tests, the laboratory shall lest the thttd sample
I. if the third Samite passes the activity and/or cullure lest_,
the produCt sat=sties the requirements for use of the Seal
2. If the th=rd sample tails the aCbv=ty or culture tests, the
company must begin the entire testing proce_.s again by
taking three new samples from a single produClion run.
D. Ir both of the original setup|as fair the activity or culture tests, a
company shall proceeci as If the third sample tailed the aclJvity e_
culture tests, and thus foltow the procedures specified in Section
_V.C.2. Reports submitted with an application shall include all
results, including results of analyse= on samples which diO not pass
the a_vity end/or culture test.
V. AWARD/DENIAL OF SEAL
A, Decisions regarding whether tO awa;d oz deny us_ of the Seal shall
be made by the NYA Seal Program Committee. which consists of
hrtp.llwww.aboutyog_n.com/industry AndResources/lacSealRules.asp
SO"el 916_ t_98 _I_ _31_0 3flUS± -LLNI £Ofl'.
656B
......_ ..................... .,, , ,_m=,, ,'_U_I,,LJU_L a_U _ppHcatton .. t_age 3 o14
VI.
Vll.
the Prc6idcnt of NYA (Chairperson of the Comm_ee) and two o_e_
representatives from rhP. staff of NYA. The daosion is based solely
On whether'. (1) the application submitted is complete, and, (2)
whet_er results of the analy'bcal tests demonattete that the product
COmities wfth the specified requirements for uae of the Seal. 1"he
Commit'lee. in its discretlozL rney ask the aPpheant for additional
reformation.
B. The Seal Program Commtnee may consult wl_ the Scientific Affairs
Committee of the Associalion. If the product being reviewed
involves an NYA member, the member's represen_tive on the
_dentlfic AffaLm Carom=tree is not _.rrnitted to cerise on that
product.
C. Decisions on whether to award or deny use of the Seal shall be
made within 10 we_kiog days from the date a completed apphcatlon
is received. Applicanta sha[I be notified in writing promptly of the
Seal Program Comm_.lee's Oecision
APPEALABILITY OF DECISION
A If an applicant's request for use of the Seal is denied, the applicant
may reque_l e hearing before tea Se_l Program Committee. The
heedng shell be held within 20 working days from the date of tee
request, unless the applicant and the Seal Program Commzttee
agree to extend the time period.
B. The hearing ahell be held in the Washington, D.C. area Thu
hearing may be by tetephene. _t agreecl to by the applicant
C. The hearing shall be informal Jnnature. The appJieent may present
whiten or oral testimony andlQr argument and may be rel_esented
by courtssl. A memorandum of the he_ring sha_| be _adc by %he
chairman of the Seal Program Committee end provided Io the
apl01ic_nt.
D The Seal Program Committee shs_l render a cleci_'.iot_within fNe
working days following a hearing. All decisions made by the
Comm_tlee on appeal shall be final.
ANNUAL RE NEWAURECE RTIFICATION
A. Use of the .Seat m valid for one year from the date of approval.
15. Continued u_e ofthe Seat shallbe grantedeach year upon
submfBaion of a renewal application oemfying that e materiel
change (e.g. change in cultures used. sigmfiCent char}ge in
ma_ectunng processes., u,_e of a d{fferent sweetener, etc ) has
not occurred in the manufacture of tee product mat reesonal_,y
could effect compliance with the requirements, or upor_ _)rovmion to
_e Seal Program Committee of current informa_on which
demonstrates that the product still eonform_ to the required cnteda.
Where new information is proviOed, r_ults ol the analysis in
_.cordance with Appendix B also must be submitted
C. A malarial change in the procluct or its method of manufacture
shall cause the right to use the Seal to end immediately,
unless a new application ha_ _n approved.
D. When a material change has occurred in a product, the renewal
aDl:_cati_)n shell be accompanied by a no_-refundeb_e fee el
$;2,500 for that pro(_uct. If there are no matedal changes in the
product, the renewal fee is $2,000 for that produCt. Voting B_d
hrtp:awww.aboutyogurt.condindustryAndResource_acS ealRules .asp656C
VIII.
Active No_voting Members' clues include funds for ten and five
initial and/or renewal applications respectively per calender year.
E. Tests conducted to determine ehgll_hty for the Seal are valid for
three years (unless tasting is otherw, se required under the Seal
criteria). On the anniversary of the fourth renewal, a company must
6uDmit v_th its eppl=catJon for renewal, test result_ lnerformeO In t_e
previous three months which demonstrate the I_roduct for which the
renewal application is submitted still meels NYA Seal criteria.
F. It shall be the duty of any company that wishes to continue to use
the Seal to ensure compliance with tt_e renewal Drovisions under
thi_ sec'=uon.
USE OF NYA Seal
A. The NYA Seal is as follOWS:
B. NYA recommenUs that the logo portion of the S_al appear on the
PrincTpal Display Panel of the product's label printed with a pcsd=ve
_mage. The acceptable minimum size is when the "L" in the word
"Live" of the logo equals 1/16th of an inch.
C. NYA recommends that the logo be as dose as possible to the
bottom left hand corner of the Principal E)mplay Panel TMe
asteri,skecl e_tement should be as close as pos'sible to the logo but
it may aplDear anywhere on the label.
Q. Color: For NYA Seals on packages, NYA recommencls Process
Magenta or Process i31ue on packages with 4-color procesSing On
non-4-color processing, NYA recommend= ¢,the use o! the d_rke_ or
most prominent colo¢ of the package graphics. On labehng and m
a_ertising, any suitable color may be u_ed.
E. A company may use the Seal on the product's label, labelmq, or
adve_smg or In other promotional materials.
(As adopted by the National Yogurt Assecda_on Board on May 25. 1991.September 17. 1991 and Set, ember 27. 1993.)
htlp://www aboutyogurl com/industryAndResources/lacSealRules.asp
LS"d 916I 179EEIE 3314d0 B(It_LL ]INI rL_=.
656D
i _,-. ,_
National Yogurt Association Cdteria For Live andActive Culture Yogurt
Live end act, s culture yogurt (refrigerated cup and frozen yogurt) Is the food \
produced by culturing Grade A dmry maredents wRh s charactanzm 9 bactenal )culture m accordance with the standards of idenIRy for yogurt (21 C.F.R. S
131 2D0), Iowfat yogurt (21 C.F.R S _31.203), and nonfat yogurt (21 C.FR. S
131.206). In sd0i_on to the use of the bacterial ¢,_ure_ raquered bytes referenced
federal standards of iclet_tlly and by _ese NYA critene, bye ancl at'rive culture
yogurt may contain other safe and suitable food gra_e bacterial cultures.
Declarer|on of the presence of cultures on the label of live and active culture yogurtis up, anal.
Heat _reatment of live and active yogurt i9 i_consistent with the maintenance of live
and active curtures in the oroduct, accordingly, heet treatment which i6 intended to
kill the hve and active organisms shall not be undoRaken after fermentation.
L_kewise. manufacturers of hve an_l actwe culture yogurt shou[_l undertske their
best efforts to ensure th_ distnb_on !Otactices, code dates, and handhng
_n._tructions are conducive to the maintenance of live and actwe cultures.
In orOer to meet these NYA crRens, live and actwe culture yogurt must set, sty each
of these requirements'
'L The pcoduct must be fermented w#th both L delbrueckii su_p.
bulgarlcus and S. thermophilus.
2. For refdgereted yogurt, the total viable count at the t_me of manufa_.lure will
be 10 e CFU per gram. In the case of frozen yogurt, the total viable count at
• e time of manufacture wiJl be 107 CFU per gram•
The cultures must be ac'0ve at the end ol the stated shelf.life as
determined by the activity test described =n the '%amDl_ng _nd _aly'_i_l
Procedures." Compliance with this requirement shall be determined by
meeting the cnten_ for the _ctlvrty test on two of the three reprcsentabve
samples of yoguM which have been stored a_ temperatures between 32
degrees F. and _5 0egress F. for rcfngerated cup yogurt and at
temperatures of 0 degrees F. or colder for frozen yogur_ for the entire
stated shelf-life of t_o oroduct. Ti3e ac'_vity lest is met if there is an
_ncreaseof one log duringfermentation,
4. In the case of frozen yogurt, the _roduct shall hove o total l_trateb_e acidity
expressed as le_c acid of at least 0.3% ef _11times. At least 0. _ 5% of total
acidity must be obtained by fermentation. Th_s =e confirmed by
_lemonsttetmg the presence of both 13 & L iorms of lacticacid
J
/
hrtp://www, aboutyogun.com/indu stryA.n dP, esources/lacCriteria.a sp
80"d 9TSI t_9_ _;E 3DlddO 3(IU_LL 9±NI £0U_.,
656E
_age t ol L
Yogurt - A Glossary of Terms
yogurt Varieties I Yogurt Facts I Hot All Yoaur_ Are Created I;;q.nlGlossary t _A/holesorp_Foocl for Every Boaly
Here are _he common terms nssociated wrth yogurt that cDntBins Itve ancl sctiv_ cuItur0s nnd th0productE; called "yogurt" that do not contain live and active cultures when paokaoed end dmtributr
Sore(.• descriptJons are estabhsheO by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA,), while Others arede?ermined by the manufacturers,
http://www.ab outyogun.com/]acYogurt/glossary.asp
60"c_ 9TGl t_E ET_ 331_0 3(IU_I q/N] £06_,,
656F_:_L ",_d_ c" - '-, _.- d:l_
"=,...
Live & Active Culture Yogurt
Home.What makes yogurt, welt, yogurt? The words "live and active cultures" refer to thelivingorganisms. Lactobao/lus bu/gadcusand Streptococcusthermaophl/us, wh=chConvet'tpasteurized milk to yogurt duringfermentation Note that the milk ispmsteurizedbefore culturingto remove any harmful bacteria. The pro(;ess Is verysimilar to that used when making beer, wine or cheese, in that beneficialorganisms ferment anc_transformthe basicfood. This fermenfaOon process iswhat crea_es yogurt,_th i1_unique taste, textule end healthful attriDutes
Some yogurt Droductsare heat-treated after fermentation, which kills most of thebenefiaal actJvecultures(ound_n1he ,/ogu_L To help you edenti_V_he_e yogu_p'oduct_ that conteir) live axeda_ive ¢ultu[es, the National Yogurt Association(NYA) has established a special/./us & Act;re Cultures seal. The NYA is a natJonalnon.profittrade organization whose purpose _Sto sponsor health and medicalresearch for yogurtwith I_veand active culturesand sane as an informationsource to the trade and the general ou_ic The Live& Active Cu/tL_reseal, whichappears on refngeratedand frozen yogurtcontainers, helpsyou recognize thoseproductscor_ainmg significant amounts of hveand acl_vecultures, The seal is avoluntary=dentfftc_ationavailable to all manufacturers of refrigerated yOgurtwhoseproducts contain at least 100 mllhon culturesper gram atthe time of manufacture,and whose frozen yogurtcontainsat least 10 m_llionculturesper gram at the timeof manufacture. Since the se_t _rogram eS,_olun_ary,some yogurt pcoductsmayhave some live culturesbLRnot carry theseal. It is, however, the industryvaliclationof the presenceend ac'_vi_ of _gniflcant levels of live cultures.
Look ferlhe Live & Active Cultures seal on the yogurt you buy. and learn mo__
about hueand active cultureyogurt by chokingon the following: YogurtWt}olesome Food froEvery Body
i, Yogurt varie'_es• Live end Active Cultures Yogurt Facts• Don_tt_e Fooled: Not All Yo_urts Are Crea_ed F.-.quel• Yogurt - A Giossarv of Terms• Yogurt Wry_ores_ariseFood for Every Body
h_p'//w_w.ab outyogun.cort_ acYogurd
3=H..d"ID 3(_d_ll 71NI z_u_,,
656G
• o
o
. - ,
I
• ©
0
1275 B
RECORD PRESSDecades of Experience _ _ Cutting Edge Technology
Since 1945
157 Chambers Street, New York, N.Y. 10007 .Tel: (212) 619-4949 -Fax No. (212) 608-3141
13479STATE OF NEW YORK, ) .
SS:
COUNTRY OF NEW YORK }
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Howard Daniels, being duly sworn, deposes and says that deponent is not party to the action, and is
over 18 years of age.
That on the 22, day of June 2005 deponent served 2 copy(s) of the within
CORRECTED NONCONFIDENTIAL
JOINT APPENDIX
upon the attorneys at the addresses below, and by the following method:
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS NEXT BUSINESS DAY DEUVERY
Saul DavisU.S. Department of JusticeCivil Divisior_Commercial Litigation Branch26 Federal PlazaNew York, New York 10278
Sworn to me this
June 22, 2005NADIA R, OSWALD
Notary Public. State of Ne_v YorkNo. 010S6101366
Qualified in Kings CountyCommission Expires November I0, 2007
Case Name: Pillsbury Co. v. US
Docket/Case No. O4-1591