joseph e. zveglich, jr. - oecd.org - oecd e. zveglich, jr. assistant chief economist, asian...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Joseph E. Zveglich, Jr. Assistant Chief Economist, Asian Development Bank
OECD – Development Center
Paris, 19 April 2012
Key messages • Developing Asia to maintain growth momentum
despite weak global demand—6.9% in 2012 and 7.3% in 2013
• Inflation will moderate to 4.6% and 4.4% in 2012 and 2013, but geopolitical risks can raise oil prices
• Uncertainties in the eurozone remain, but developing Asia can manage its effects
• Currently, no clear case for short-term countercyclical policy
• Developing Asia is facing a new challenge—rising inequality
2
Developing Asia’s growth is subdued but steady…
10.1
6.7 6.0
9.1
7.2 6.9 7.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012f 2013f
GDP growth
5-year moving average
4
f: forecast
…despite continued weakness in major industrial economies
2010
Actual
2011
Actual
2012 ADO 2012 projection
2013 ADO 2012 projection
GDP growth (%)
Major industrial economies 2.8 1.2 1.1 1.7
United States 3.0 1.7 2.0 2.3
Eurozone 1.9 1.4 -0.5 1.0
Japan 4.4 -0.7 1.9 1.5
5
Growth supported by domestic demand
6
2.1 3.1 4.8 3.8
2.2 1.2 2.5 1.8
1.3
5.7 5.0 4.2
2.2 4.0 5.2
0.8
-1.8
1.9
10.4 9.2 9.6
7.5 6.2
3.6
7.8
0.1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011
Private Consumption Government Consumption
Investment Net Exports
PRC India Korea, Rep. of Thailand
Varying Growth by Subregion …
7.2
6.2
8.0
6.4
4.6
7.0
6.9 6.1
7.4 6.6
5.2 6.0
7.3
6.2
7.7 7.1
5.7
4.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Developing Asia
Central Asia East Asia South Asia Southeast Asia
The Pacific
Subregional GDP growth
2011 2012f 2013f
7
f: forecast
…emphasizes disparities within Asia
2011 2012f 2013f
South Asia 6.4 6.6 7.1
India 6.9 7.0 7.5
Pakistan 2.4 3.6 4.0
Sri Lanka 8.3 7.0 8.0
Southeast Asia 4.6 5.2 5.7
Indonesia 6.5 6.4 6.7
Malaysia 5.1 4.0 5.0
Philippines 3.7 4.8 5.0
Singapore 4.9 2.8 4.5
Thailand 0.1 5.5 5.5
Viet Nam 5.9 5.7 6.2
2011 2012f 2013f
Central Asia 6.2 6.1 6.2
Kazakhstan 7.5 6.0 6.5
Kyrgyz Republic 5.7 5.0 5.5
East Asia 8.0 7.4 7.7
China, People’s Rep. of 9.2 8.5 8.7
Hong Kong, China 5.0 3.0 4.5
Korea, Rep. of 3.6 3.4 4.0
Taipei,China 4.0 3.4 4.6
The Pacific 7.0 6.0 4.1
Fiji Islands 2.1 1.0 1.2
Papua New Guinea 8.9 7.5 4.5
8
f: forecast
Inflation is set to recede…
4.4
6.6
1.4
4.4
5.9
4.6 4.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012f 2013f
Inflation
5-year moving average
9
f: forecast
…but commodity price volatility is a threat
10
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12
Index, 2005=100
Energy Food
Nature of the eurozone crisis has changed—as has the risk for Asia
• Risk of liquidity crunch has diminished
• Fiscal austerity to drag eurozone growth
• Asia can manage current conditions
• But if the situation worsens:
– Effect on global value chains
– Implications for trade finance
– Impact on capital flows
11
Fickle capital flows need to be watched
39.7 45.1 16.6 12.9
39.3 50.8 36.1 38.1
-17.7
46.8
-53.4
33.6 10.4
-20.7
92.9 45.1
44.5
30.5
-60
0
60
120
180
Q1 2010
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 2011
Q2 Q3
$ billion
Capital flows, emerging Asia
FDI Portfolio Other investments Net
12
Currently, no clear case for countercyclical policy
13
-6
-3
0
3
6
2005 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
%
Output gap, East Asia and India
People's Rep. of China Hong Kong, China India Republic of Korea Taipei,China
Forecast
-6
-3
0
3
6
2005 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
%
Output gap, Southeast Asia
Indonesia Malaysia Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam
Forecast
Monetary policy readjustment may be required if inflation pressures build
-0.6 -0.7
0.7
0.0
-1.1
-1.3 -1.4
-0.8
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Indonesia Pakistan Korea, Rep. of
Thailand
Per
cen
tage
po
ints
Change in core and headline inflation, July/Aug 2011 vs. Jan/Feb 2012
Core Headline -12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Jan-08 Sep-08 May-09 Jan-10 Sep-10 May-11 Jan-12
Real interest rates
China, People's Rep. of India Indonesia
14
Boost domestic demand without undermining fiscal positions
• Budget-neutral measures for expenditure switching to social spending
• Expand expenditure alongside revenue enhancements
• Important for Asia in confronting rising inequality
15
Inequality in Asia is on the rise…
• Inequality increased in countries accounting for more than 80% of Asia’s population
• Gini coefficients worsened from:
– 32 to 43 in the PRC
– 33 to 37 in India
– 29 to 39 in Indonesia
• Taking developing Asia as a single unit, its Gini coefficient went from 39 to 46
17
…as rich have benefited from growth more than the poor
18
3.9
7.1
4.8 4.1 4.3
5.1 4.8 4.5 4.7
8.9
5.7 6.6
5.9
9.6
6.9
4.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
BAN GEO IND INO LAO PRC SRI TAJ
Quintile ratios, countries with rising inequality
1990s 2000s
BAN=Bangladesh; GEO=Georgia; IND=India; INO=Indonesia; LAO=Lao PDR; PRC=People’s Republic of China; SRI=Sri Lanka; TAJ=Tajikistan
Both within- and between-country inequality increased in Asia
• Between-country inequality grew faster, due to PRC’s relatively rapid growth
• But more than 2/3 of inequality in Asia still due to within-country inequality
19
22.6 29.6
77.4 70.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1996 2008
Between-country inequality
Within-country inequality
Inequality of opportunity is also prevalent
• Children from poorest households 3–5 times more likely to be out of school, and 10–20 times less likely to attend college
• Infant mortality rates among poorest households 2–3 times larger
• Gender disparities in tertiary education persist
20
Asia’s inequality is lower, but its rise over time is a concern
• Average Gini in developing Asia was 38 compared with 52 for Latin America
• Asia’s recent experience contrasts with “growth with equity” in the 1960s and 1970s
• Many African and Latin American countries recorded declines in Gini coefficients
21
Inequality matters for Asia
• Widening inequality undermines poverty reduction
– More inclusive growth would have lifted another 240 million people out of poverty
• Inequality can weaken the basis of growth itself
– Can undermine social cohesion and worsen the quality of governance
Policy makers recognize the problem
22
Why has inequality risen?
• Technological progress, globalization, and market-oriented reform drove high growth in Asia, but they favored:
– capital over labor
– skilled over unskilled workers
– cities over inland areas
23
Labor share is declining
24
48.4
30.5 36.5
42.2
28.8
21.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
People's Rep. of China Indonesia India
%
Share of labor income (manufacturing sector), selected Asian countries
Mid-1990s Mid-2000s
Education inequality accounts for 25–35% of total inequality
25
8.1
26.5
20.3
29.9 29.8 25.0 23.2 24.7
30.8 35.7
44.2 46.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
19
95
20
07
19
93
20
09
-10
19
90
20
10
20
02
20
08
19
94
20
09
19
95
20
05
PRC India Indonesia Pakistan Philippines Thailand
Shar
e o
f b
etw
ee
n-g
rou
p in
eq
ual
ity,
%
Income inequality decomposition by educational attainment of household head
Spatial differences contribute to widening inequality
26
13
21 22 26
32 35
38
54
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sri Lanka (2009)
Philippines (2009)
Pakistan (2008)
Indonesia (2009)
India (2008)
Viet Nam (2008)
Bhutan (2007)
PRC (2007)
Share of spatial inequality to total inequality (%)
Policy makers can act to reverse rising inequality
• Implement targeted fiscal policies to reduce inequality in human capital
• Introduce interventions to address lagging regions
• Make growth more employment friendly to increase the labor income share
27
Key messages
• Developing Asia to maintain growth momentum despite weak global demand—6.9% in 2012 and 7.3% in 2013
• Inflation will moderate to 4.6% and 4.4% in 2012 and 2013, but geopolitical risks can raise oil prices
• Uncertainties in the eurozone remain, but developing Asia can manage its effects
• Currently, no clear case for short-term countercyclical policy
• Developing Asia is facing a new challenge—rising inequality
28