kazakhstan renewable energy financing facility (kazreff ... · kazakhstan renewable energy...
TRANSCRIPT
Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review
Appendix A – Receptor ‘value’, ‘vulnerability’ and ‘sensitivity’
Appendix A: Receptor ‘value’, ‘vulnerability’ and ‘sensitivity’
This SER has used expert judgement to determine the sensitivity of receptors based on the value of each receptor against the vulnerability of that receptor to changes resulting from each renewable energy scenario (Table A1 –A7). The value, vulnerability and sensitivity of receptors are defined as follows:
Value: the value of a receptor (either high or low) is based on the scale of geographic reference, rarity, importance for biodiversity, social or economic reasons, and level of legal protection;
Vulnerability: the vulnerability of a receptor (either high, medium, low or none) is based on likelihood of a receptor being exposed to an environmental effect from the KazREFF programme, and the receptor’s tolerance and resilience to a given environmental effect;
Sensitivity: the sensitivity of a receptor is determined as being either high, medium, low or none, based on the combination of the receptor value and vulnerability, as identified below matrix.
Value
High – receptor is rare, important for social or economic reasons, legally protected, of international or national designation
Low – receptor is common, of local or regional designation
Vu
lner
abil
ity
High e.g. potential pathways exist for environmental change in receptors as a result of KazREFF, receptor is in a declining condition, dependent on a narrow range of environmental conditions
High Medium
Medium e.g. few pathways exist for environmental change in receptors as a result of KazREFF, receptor is only expected to recover from disturbance over a prolonged period of time, if at all
Medium Medium
Low e.g. limited or no pathways exist for environmental change in receptors as a result of KazREFF, receptor is in stable or favourable condition &/ or dependent on wide range of environmental conditions
Medium Low
None e.g. no pathways exist between environmental changes and receptors, receptor is insensitive to disturbance
None
None
1. Climate and Air quality
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-1.
Table A-1: Sensitivity of receptors for Climate and Air quality Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
Type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Climate High –
Climate is an global issue
None –
Installation of wind turbine will not affect the climate
None None –
Installation of solar PV will not affect the climate
None None –
Installation of SSH will not affect the climate
None None –
Installation of biogas facility will not affect the climate
None
Air quality High –
Air quality is national priority which could be a trans boundary issue
Low –
Limited impact is expected during the construction.
Medium Low –
There is limited impact during the construction.
Medium Low –
Limited impact is expected during the construction.
Medium Low –
Limited impact is expected during the construction.
Medium
Odour Low –
Odour is an issue with a limited area.
None –
Wind power does not generate odours; therefore, there is no pathway.
None None –
Solar power does not generate odours; therefore, there is no pathway.
None None –
SSH power does not generate odours; therefore, there is no pathway.
None None –
Biogas can only occur on capped landfill, which reduces odours. Emissions are used to generate electricity and decrease emissions
None
2. Surface Water and Groundwater
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-2.
Table A-2: Sensitivity of receptors for Surface Water and Groundwater
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Surface water resource
High –
Availability of surface water resources is of national importance, especially given water scarcity issues forecast for Kazakhstan.
May also be a trans-boundary issue in some locations.
None –
Wind farm development will not utilize water resources; therefore, there is no pathway for environmental change.
None None -
Solar PV plant development will not utilize water resources; therefore, there is no pathway for environmental change.
None
Medium -
There is a potential to change surface water resources due to changes and usage of water as a power source in SSH systems.
Medium None –
Biogas plant development will not utilize water resources; therefore, there is no pathway for environmental change.
None
Surface water quality
High –
Quality of surface water resources is of national importance, especially given water scarcity issues forecast for Kazakhstan.
High -
Construction works, such as installation of turbine foundations and access roads, may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters if placed in close proximity to surface water resources.
High High -
Construction works, such as installation of solar panel and access roads, may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters if placed in close proximity to surface water resources.
High High -
Construction works may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters.
Potential operational impact upon water quality due to disruption of flow, sediment dynamics, etc.
High High -
Construction works, such as installation of solar panel and access roads, may cause erosion, surface run-off and sedimentation of surface waters if placed in close proximity to surface water resources.
High
3. Geology and soils
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-3.
Table A-3: Sensitivity of receptors for Geology and Soils
Receptors Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
Type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Bedrock Geology Low –
Geology common to localities or region
Low –
Pathways limited to construction blasting, drilling and foundations
Low None –
No likely potential pathway - construction of facilities are unlikely to require construction at depths that would affect bedrock geology
None Low –
Pathways limited to dam construction blasting, drilling and foundations
Low None –
No likely potential pathway - construction of facilities are unlikely to require construction at depths that would affect bedrock geology
None
Various receptors in Mudflow Hazard Areas
(only in mudflow prone areas)
High –
Mudflow hazards mostly in mountainous regions, adjacent to steep river banks, and along southern border mostly detrimental to environment, public health & welfare
None
Mudflow prone areas are a siting constraint and facilities will not be sited in these areas. Therefore, there are no pathways.
None None
Mudflow prone areas are a siting constraint and facilities will not be sited in these areas. Therefore, there are no pathways.
None Medium –
Project construction activities, land clearing, vegetation removal, inundation along rivers in mudflow prone areas could increase chances for inducing mudflows in higher risk areas.
Medium None –
Mudflow prone areas are a siting constraint and faculties will not be sited in these areas. Therefore, there are no pathways.
None
High Value Soils
(only where geographically present)
High –
Primarily in Northern Kazakhstan, chernozems and other high value soils critical to agricultural productivity and economy
Medium –
Facility footprint and construction activities can result in loss of use for agricultural purposes.
Medium Medium –
Facility footprint and construction activities can result in loss of use for agricultural purposes.
Medium Medium –
Small run-of-river project footprint limits pathways but impoundment can impact broader area. Construction activities, land clearing, removal of vegetation, alteration of drainage can increase erosion / loss of receptor
Medium None –
Most, if not all, biogas projects would be on previously degraded lands.
None
General Soil Characteristics
Low –
General soils of all classifications are common and local
Medium -
Removal of vegetation, erosion, potential release of chemicals, and compaction under heavy equipment and facilities can effect changes to soil characteristics.
Medium Medium -
Removal of vegetation, erosion, potential release of chemicals, and compaction under heavy equipment and facilities can effect changes to soil characteristics.
Medium Medium -
Removal of vegetation, erosion, potential release of chemicals, and compaction under heavy equipment and facilities can effect changes to soil characteristics.
Medium Medium -
Removal of vegetation, erosion, potential release of chemicals, and compaction under heavy equipment and facilities can effect changes to soil characteristics.
Medium
4. Landscape and Biodiversity
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-4.
Table A-4: Sensitivity of receptors for Landscape and Biodiversity
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Protected areas High –
Protected areas are internationally, nationally and regionally important areas of natural habitat, supporting rare, endangered species.
High -
There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the wind turbine development if sited in or near these areas. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High High -
There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the solar PV development if sited in or near these areas. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High
Medium –
There would be limited area of footprint occupied by small hydro. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
Medium None –
Candidate landfills for biogas facilities are not likely to be present in or near protected areas; however, transmission lines could impact these areas
None
Bird and bat species (migratory species)
High –
Migratory species in Kazakhstan are internationally, nationally and regionally important.
High -
There could be loss of population of migratory bird due to strike associated with turbine and additional above ground transmission line. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High High -
There could be loss of population of migratory bird due to additional above ground transmission line. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High High -
There could be loss of population of migratory bird due to additional above ground transmission line. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High High -
There could be loss of population of migratory bird due to additional above ground transmission line. Receptors are dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High
Important terrestrial species
High –
Vulnerable or endangered species such as those species cited under the IUCN red list and Kazakhstan red list.
High –
There could be loss of habitat of important terrestrial species by the wind turbine and transmission line development, particularly during construction. Receptors are in decline and dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High High –
There could be loss of habitat of important terrestrial species by the solar PV and transmission line development, particularly during construction. Receptors are in decline and dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High High–
There could be loss of habitat of important terrestrial species by the SSH and transmission line development, particularly during construction. Receptors are in decline and dependent on narrow range of conditions.
High Medium –
Candidate landfills for biogas facilities are not likely to provide useful habitat and would not support important terrestrial species. However, transmission lines could impact these species
Medium
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Important Aquatic species
High –
Vulnerable or endangered species such as those species cited under the IUCN red list and Kazakhstan red list.
High –
Aquatic species could be affected by stormwater runoff, particularly during construction if sited close to water supporting important aquatic species
High High –
Aquatic species could be affected by stormwater runoff, particularly during construction if sited close to water supporting important aquatic species.
High High -
Change in water environment by withdrawal or discharge can have local and regional scale impact on affected water bodies and have potential to disrupt protected fish species if sited close to water supporting important aquatic species.
High None
None
Forest Areas High –
Forest areas are limited in Kazakhstan
High –
There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the wind turbine and transmission line development if sited in or near these areas.
High High –
There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the solar PV and transmission line development if sited in or near these areas.
High Medium –
There would be limited area of footprint occupied by small hydro; however, transmission lines could impact forested areas
Medium Medium –
Candidate landfills for biogas facility are not likely to have forest areas; however, transmission lines could impact these species
Medium
Unprotected natural ecosystems
Low-
Network of general natural ecosystem
Low–
There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the wind turbine development; however, the receptor is stable and common.
Low Low–
There could be permanent loss of the large land areas occupied by the solar PV development; however, the receptor is stable and common.
Low Low–
There would be limited area of footprint occupied by small hydro and the receptor is stable and common.
Low None–
Biogas facilities are not likely to be present in or near valued natural ecosystems – no pathway..
None
High quality landscape
High –
Protected and forested areas are an important resources for visual amenity and unique landscapes character
High –
The presence of wind turbine could directly affect the value of landscape of protected area, their setting and people experience of these landscapes.
High High –
The presence of Solar PV could directly affect the value of landscape of protected area, their setting and people experience of these landscapes.
High Medium –
Small Hydro facility may have local scale landscape impact.
Medium None–
Biogas facilities would be located on existing landfills, which already have a degraded visual character..
None
5. Community and Socio-economics
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-5.
Table A-5: Sensitivity of receptors for Community and Socio-economics
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
Type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Housing and Livelihood
High –
Housing and livelihood are important and sensitive community issues.
High –
If facility or transmission lines are sited in high density areas, could require resettlement or loss of livelihood.
High High –
If facility or transmission lines are sited in high density areas, could require resettlement or loss of livelihood.
High High –
If facility or transmission lines are sited in high density areas, could require resettlement or loss of livelihood.
High Low – Possible resettlement for transmission lines.
Medium
Health High –
human health is a National importance
High –
possible noise and dust during construction and noise and vibration during operation.
Possible injury during construction and installation of transmission lines.
High Medium –
possible noise and dust disturbances during construction.
Possible injury during construction and installation of transmission lines.
Medium Medium –
possible noise and dust disturbances during construction.
Possible injury during construction and installation of transmission lines.
Medium Low –
possible noise and dust disturbances during construction.
Positive impact to air quality by replacing fossil fuel and capping open landfill.
Possible injury during construction and installation of transmission lines.
Medium
Local employment/income
Low –
Unemployment rate is generally low and similar jobs are comment
Medium –
Few pathways for increasing employment after construction.
Medium Medium–
Few pathways for increasing employment after construction.
Medium Medium –
Few pathways for increasing employment after construction.
Medium Medium –
Few pathways for increasing employment after construction.
Medium
Economy High –
balanced development of major sectors is critical for stable development
Medium –
improvement in energy security.
Permanent loss of
Medium Medium –
improvement in energy security.
Permanent loss of
Medium Medium –
improvement in energy security.
Water availability and quality for industry, mining and agriculture
Medium Medium –
improvement in energy security.
Possibility of loss of land
Medium
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
Type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity productive land (agriculture, grazing and mineral etc.) due to installation of equipment.
productive land (agriculture, grazing and mineral etc.) due to installation of equipment.
may be affected during construction and operation.
nutrients from the soil by using biogas for power generation.
Tourism Low – contribution of tourism to national economy is underdeveloped.
Low –
Transmission lines might detract from the scenery but very limited pathways for change.
Low Low –
Transmission lines might detract from the scenery but very limited pathways for change.
Low Low –
Transmission lines might detract from the scenery but very limited pathways for change.
Water impoundments may create additional recreation opportunities
Low Low –
Transmission lines might detract from the scenery but very limited pathways for change.
Low
6. Cultural Heritage
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-6.
Table A-6: Sensitivity of receptors for Cultural Heritage
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
UNESCO World Heritage Sites and sites on the UNESCO Tentative List
High - High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High
Registered cultural heritage sites.
High - High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High High -
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High
Unregistered or unknown cultural heritage sites
High to Low - High –
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High to Medium
High –
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High to Medium
High –
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High to Medium
High –
If project is sited on or near receptor.
High to Medium
Intangible cultural heritage
High to Low - Low –
Possibility to cause change is unlikely, however impact should be evaluated locally.
Medium to Low
Low –
Possibility to cause change is unlikely, however impact should be evaluated locally.
Medium to Low
Low –
Possibility to cause change is unlikely, however impact should be evaluated locally.
Medium to Low
Low –
Possibility to cause change is unlikely, however impact should be evaluated locally.
Medium to Low
7. Material assets
The value, vulnerability, and sensitivity of the environmental receptors for this topic are shown in Table A-7.
Table A-7: Sensitivity of receptors for Material assets
Receptor Wind Solar PV Small Hydro Biogas
type Value Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity Vulnerability Sensitivity
Infrastructure High –
Infrastructure is critical for stable development
Medium –
Temporary impact to traffic during construction. Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.
Possible impact to the existing infrastructure due to equipment installation.
Possible improvement in energy access and stability.
Medium Medium –
Temporary impact to traffic during construction. Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.
Possible impact to the existing infrastructure due to equipment installation.
Possible improvement in energy access and stability.
Medium Medium –
Temporary impact to traffic during construction.
Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.
Possible improvement in energy access and stability.
Medium Medium –
Temporary impact to traffic during construction.
Possible impact to the existing facility due to equipment installation.
Need to construct new transmission lines to connect with grid.
Possible improvement in energy access and stability.
Medium
Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review
Appendix B – Kazakhstan Species Distribution Maps
Figure B-1: Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Mammals, excluding bats (Table 1/2)
Altai argali (Ovis ammon ammon) Tian shan argali (Ovis ammon karelini) Karatau argali (Ovis ammov nigrimontana)
Urial (Ovis orientalis) Bukhara red deer (Cervus elaphus bactrianus) Asiatic wild dog (Cuon alpinus)
Caracal (Lynx caracal) Otter (Lutra lutra seistanica) Honey badger (Mellivora capensis)
Figure B-1 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Mammals, excluding bats (Table 2/2)
Russian desman (Desmana moschata) Central asian wild ass (Equus hemionus) Menzbier marmot (Marmota menzbieri)
Goitered Gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) Siberian Musk Deer (Moschus moschiferus) Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia)
Caspian Seal (Pusa caspica) Mongolian Saiga (Saiga tatarica) European Marbled Polecat (Vormela peregusna)
Figure B-2 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Reptiles
Desert monitor (Varanus griseus)
Figure B-3 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Ampihbians
Asiatic frog (Rana asiatica)
Figure B-4 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Fishes (Table 1/2)
Volga shad (Alosa kessleri volgensis) Pike asp (Aspiolucius esocinus) Aral barbel (Barbus brachycephalus brachephalus)
Turkestan barbel (Barbus capito conocephalus) Ili marinka (Schizothorax argentatus pseudaksaiensis) Balkhash perch (Perca schrenki)
Caspian lamprey (Caspiomyzon wagneri) Inconnu (bukhtarma-zaysan population) (Stenodus leucichtys
nelma) Taimen trout (Hucho taimen)
Figure B-4 : Kazakhstan Species Distribution map for Red List Fishes (Table 2/2)
Aral trout (Salmo trutta aralensis) Caspian trout (Salmo trutta caspius)
Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review
Appendix C –List of Cultural Heritage of Kazakhstan Under National Government Program
Table C-1: List of Cultural Heritage of Kazakhstan under National Government Program
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
Astana
1 Building for production workshops of the Kazakh musical-drama theatre named after Kuanyshbayev (former Muslim school), 19th century.
urban development and architecture
ul. Otyrar, 31
2 Congress Hall (former Palace of the Virgin Soil Developers). The Architects O. N. Krauskaya, D. K. Danneberg. 1963, reconstruction in 2000-2001.
urban development and architecture
ul. Beibitshilik, 1
Almaty
3 The main building of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Architect A. Shchusev. 1948-1953, 1980.
urban development and architecture
ul. Shevchenko, 28
4 National Library of the Republic of Kazakhstan (the former State Library named after A.S. Pushkin). Architects V.P. Ischenko, B. H. Kim, K. Kalpoj, V. Tyutin, E. K. Kuznetsova, 1970
urban development and architecture
Prospect Abaya, 14
5 Almaty State University building (the former men's Vernenskaya Gymnasium). Architect P. Gurde. 1892-1895.
urban development and architecture
ul. Kazybek-bi, 28
6 The Palace Of The Republic. Architects N. I. N, Kim, P. Uhobotov, N. G. Ratushny, Kukushkin, B. H. Parts. 1970
urban development and architecture
Prospect Dostyk, 54, Abay square
7 The building of the Academy of arts. T. Zhurgenov (former home of the Government of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic). Architect M. J. Ginzburg. 1927-1931.
urban development and architecture
ul. Bogenbai Batyr, 136-а
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
8 Literary-Memorial Museum of M. Auezov. Architect G. Gerasimov. 1961.
urban development and architecture
ul. Tulebaev, 185
9 City ambulance station (the former home of architects Zenkov). The architect is unknown. The end of the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
ul. Kazybek-bi, 115
10 Building of Kazakh-British Technical University (former home of the Government of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic). Architects B. R. Rubanenko, T. A. Simonov. 1947-1957.
urban development and architecture
ul. Tole-bi, 59, Astana Square
11 State residence No. 4 building (former home of T. A. Golovizin, honorary citizen of the Verny city). 1905-1908.
urban development and architecture
ul. Furmanova, 162
12 The former home of the merchant M. A. Gavrilov. Architect A.P. Zenkov. The beginning of XX century.
urban development and architecture
ul. Zheltoksan, 167
13 House of fabrics "Kyzyl-Tan" (a former merchant's Gabduvaliev House). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1912.
urban development and architecture
ul. Zhibek zholy, 39
14 The building of the Museum of national musical instruments named after Ykylas (former Army Officers Assembly House). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1908.
urban development and architecture
ul. Zenkova, 24
15 United States Consulate building in the Republic of Kazakhstan (the former home of Shahvorostov, a merchant). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1890.
urban development and architecture
ul. Furmanov, 99
16 Sports complex "Medeu". Architects V. Z. Katzev, A. S. Anarkulov, engineer S. B. Matveyev. 1969-1972.
urban development and architecture
Natural landmark Medeu
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
17 The building of the State Museum of arts named after A. Kasteev. Architects E. K. Kuznetsova, O. Naumov, B. M. Novikov. 1976.
urban development and architecture
ul. Satpaeva, 30-а
18 The building of the National Centre for culture (formerly the boarding house of the Verny city gymnasium). Architect p. Gurde supported by A.P. Zenkov. 1907.
urban development and architecture
Prospect Dostyk, 15
19 Voznesensky Cathedral. The architects: A. Borisoglebsky, Troparevskij with N. Stepanova, and A.P. Zenkov. 1904-1906.
urban development and architecture
28 Panfilovtsev Memorial Park
20 The building of the Kazakh State academic theatre of Opera and Ballet named after Abay. Architects A. N. Simpletons, N. A. Orazymbetov. 1939-1941гг.
urban development and architecture
ul. Kabanbaj batyr, 112
21 The building of the Ministry of culture and information of the Republic of Kazakhstan (former municipal primary real college named after A. Kolpakovsky). Architect A.P. Zenkov. 1890г.
urban development and architecture
ul. Gogolya, 37
22 Bust of D. A. Kunaev, a three times Hero of Socialist Labor, a prominent statesman and public figure, First Secretary of the Kazakhstan Communist Party since 1964 to 1991. Sculptors T. S. Dosmagambetov, A. B. Tatarinov. 1978.
urban development and architecture
ul. Bogenbaj batyr, at the crossing with ul. Kunayeva
23 Bust of Lugansky, twice hero of the Soviet Union. Sculptor b. Pavlov, architect M.V. Belotserkovsky. 1947.
urban development and architecture
ul. Abylai khan, between ul. Gogolya and ul. Aiteke-bi
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
24 The Memorial Of Glory. Sculptors A. Artimovich, V. Andrushchenko, architects T.K. Basenov and R.A. Seidalin. 1975.
urban development and architecture
28 Panfilovtsev Memorial Park, along ul. Zenkov
25 Monument to Abai (Ibrahim) Kunanbayev. Sculptor Kh. I. Nauryzbaev, architect I. Belotserkovsky. 1961
urban development and architecture
Prospect Dostyk, Abay square
26 Monument to M. Auezov. The sculptor E. A. Yesken, architects O. Bajmurzaev, S. Anarkulov. 1980
urban development and architecture
Prospect Abaya in front of the drama theatre named after Auezov
27 Monument to Chokan Valihanov. Sculptor Kh. I. Nauryzbaev, architect Sh. E. Valikhanov. 1969
urban development and architecture
ul. Shevchenko at the square opposite the Kazakhstan Academy of Sciences
28 Monument to A. Zhangildin. Sculptors T. S. Dosmagambetov, O. G. Prokopyeva, architect Sh. Valikhanov. 1975
urban development and architecture
Alamty-1 Rail station square
29 Monument to A. Imanov. Sculptor Kh. Askar-Saryja, architect T.K Basenov. 1947
urban development and architecture
Prospect Abylay khan, Amangeldy public garden near ul. Mamtova
30 Residence of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Beginning of 90-ies of the XX century.
urban development and architecture
ul. Furmanova, 205
Akmolinsk oblast
31 The building of the Museum of the history of Kokshetau (the former House-Museum of V.V. Kuibyshev). 1889-1905
urban development and architecture
Kokshetau, ul. Dzerzhinsky, 29
32 Monument to Ch. Valikhanov. Sculptor T. S. Dosmagambetov, architect K. A. Abdikov. 1971
urban development and architecture
Kokshetau, ul. Auezova at the crossing with ul. Kuibisheva
33 Grave of folk composer Birzhan Kozhagulov (1832-1897). Sculptor T. S. Dosmagambetov. 1950
urban development and architecture
Stepnyak, ul. Lenina, suburbs of the town near the old cemetery
34 The Mausoleum of Botagaj (Bogataj). XI-XII centuries.
urban development and architecture
Koragalzhinsky district, Koragalzhin settlement, 2 km to the east from the settlement
Aktyubinsk oblast
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
35 House of culture for the railwaymen (cinema). 1928.
urban development and architecture
Aktobe, ul. Sh. Ualikhanova, 39
36 Bust of V. Patsaeva, Aviator-Cosmonaut, and hero of the Soviet Union. Sculptors Yu. A. Tour, A. A. Zavarzin. 1976.
urban development and architecture
Aktobe, sports complex, Prospect Abulkhaira
37 Monument to A. Moldagulov, Hero of the Soviet Union. Sculptor E. N. Shtamm, architect L. V. Rasputov. 1960.
urban development and architecture
Aktobe, public garden named after Moldagulova, ul. Terniyaza
38 The necropolis of Daumshar XVII-XX centuries. (mausoleum, end of 19th and early 20th century; mausoleum, 2-nd half of the 19th century; saganatam with kulpytas (No. 25); mausoleum (No. 81), 19th century; mausoleum with kulpytas (No. 86), mid-19th century; mausoleum of Murza Murun, 1880)
ensemble Baiganin district, Zharkamys settlement, 37 km south-west from the settlement, left bank of the Emba River
39 The necropolis of Karakesek XVII-XX centuries. (kulpytas and sarcophagus with a kojtas, 19th century; kulpytas (No. 7), early 20th century; fence with kulpytas (No. 10), the end of the 19th century; kulpytas (No. 15), the end of 19th and early 20th century; fence with kulpytas (# 18), 1881; saganatam (No. 68), 1914; saganatam (No. 83), the end of the 19th century; saganatam with kulpytas (No. 111), the 2-nd half of the 19th century; saganatam with kulpytas (No. 115), 1899; sandyktas with kulpytas (No. 131), the 2-nd half of the 19th century; mausoleum (No. 146), the 2-nd half of the 19th century; the mausoleum (No. 147), 1861; fence with kulpytasom (No. 330), beginning of XX century; fence with kulpytas (No. 450), 1844; mausoleum with kulpytas (No. 451), 1845)
ensemble Baiganin district, Zharkamys settlement, 60 km south-west from the settlement
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
40 Mausoleum of Sundeta built by Dauletnyaz, Master. 1st half of the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Baiganin district, Ojamuiut settlement, 30 km north-north-west from the settlement, left bank of the Emba River
41 The necropolis of Asan- Khodzha (Khozha) of the 17th-20th centuries. (saganatam (No. 1), beg. of the 20th century; saganatam (No. 2), beg. of the 20th century; saganatam (No. 3), beg. of the 20th century; saganatam (No. 3), 18th-20th centuries; mausoleum (No. 171), the 17th-20th centuries)
ensemble Baiganin district, Ojamuiut settlement, 50 km north-north-west from the settlement, Emba River valley
42 Mausoleum of Tokban, the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Shalkar district, Zhanakonis settlement, 35 km to the north-east from the settlement
43 Abat-Baytak necropolis: mausoleum, kulpytases. XIV-XX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Khobdinskiy district, Taldisay settlement, 12 km south from the settlement
Almaty oblast
44 Kapchagai hydroelectric complex. Engineer N.V.Vologdin, architect E.V. Earhart. 1965-1971.
urban development and architecture
Kapchagai city; at the Ili River banks
45 Grave of Sara Tastanbekova, akyn (1878-1916). 1972
urban development and architecture
Aksu district, Koshkental settlement, 8 кm north-west from the settlement
46 Bust of N. Aldabergenov, twice Hero of Socialist Labour. Architect K. Nauryzbaev. 1960.
urban development and architecture
Eskaldinskiy district, Aldabergenov village, The Heroes Alley near the Palace of Culture
47 Petroglyphs within the archaeological landscape Tamgaly. The bronze age, and the middle ages
archaeology Zhambyl district, Karabastau settlement, 4 km north-west from the settlement, 40 km north-west from the Kopa rail station, Tamagly mountain region in the Anyrakhai Mountains, south-eastern part of the Chu-Ily mountains separating the watersheds of the Lake Balkash and the Chu River
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
48 The complex of the House-Museum of Zhambyl 1938-1946. (House of Zhambyl, occupied by Zh. Zhabayev in 1936-1938 and by his the youngest son in 1945-1978. —lived Zhambyla Tezekbaj (museum depository), 1935; literary memorial House-Museum by the architects V. V.Biryukov, and A.K. Deyev, 1938, 1995 - Annex; Zhambyl mausoleum (1846-1945), architect I.I. Belotserkovsky, 1957, 1978 — reconstruction; administrative building, 60s; park)
urban development and architecture
Zhambyl district, Zhambyl settlement, within the settlement area
49 Besshatyr burial mounds. VII-IV centuries BC.
archaeology Kerbulakskiy district, Basshi settlement, 65 кm north from the settlement on the right bank of the Ili River near the entrance to the Shilbyr ravine
50 Ch. Valikhanov Memorial Park, 1985 (Tomb of Ch. Valikhanov (1835-1865), 1865, 1881 — setting the headstone; monument to Ch. Valihanov; sculptors Yu. Rukavishnikov, N. Milovidov, 1979, Valikhanov Museum «Altyn Emel»; architects B. Ibrayev, A. Rustembek, R. Sejdalin. 1985)
urban development and architecture
Kerbulakskiy district, Shokan settlement, 3 кm west from the settlement, western edge of the settlement
51 Architectural and art museum complex "Mosque of Zharkent" (a mosque; the Madrasah; main gate; the gate side (South, North) of the 19th century.)
urban development and architecture
Panfilov district, Zharkent, ul. Yuldasheva, 40
52 Memorial of the Cherkasy defence 1918-1919. (Museum, 1974; Cherkasy Defence Memorial. sculptor V. Yu. Rakhmanov, architects A. Ordabayev, T. B. Suleimenov, 1973; dwelling house -headquarters (1918-1919)
urban development and architecture
Sarkandskiy district, Cherkasskoye settlement, 2.5 km north from the settlement, in the centre of settlement
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
53 Talgar Settlement. VIII-XIV centuries.
archaeology Talgar district, Talgar, at the southern suburb of the town on the right bank of the River Talgar and next to the ravine entrance
Atyrau oblast
54 Residential settlement of the oil workers, 1945-1947. Architects A. V. Arefiev, S. V. Vasilkovsky. 1943-1948.
ensemble Atyrau, Area of the residential settlement of the oil workers
55 Mausoleum of Zhuban. Masters Ungalbaj, Munalbaj, Umerbaj, Itbaj, Imanbaj Karažusupov. 1880-1898.
urban development and architecture
Zhyliojskiy district, Kulsary, 90 km north from the town
56 The burial place of Makhambet Utemissov (1803-1846), poet, the leader of the uprising in 1836-1838; mausoleum was built 1995.
urban development and architecture
Inderskiy district, Indeborsky settlement, 40 km south from the settlement
57 City of Salem. XIII-XVI centuries.
archaeology Makhambetskiy district, Saraichik settlement, 1.5 km east from the settlement
Eastern Kazakhstan oblast
58 The building of the regional drama theatre. Zhambyl (former People's House). 1902.
urban development and architecture
Ust-Kamenpgorsk, ul. Golovkova, 31
59 Kredsocbank building (formerly the first public Gogol library; later Abay library; JSC "Bank Centercredit" from 1997). The end of the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Abaya, 68
60 Yamyshevsky fort gates, 18th century (1776)
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Abaya
61 The building of the regional historical Museum (former home of the Governor). 1856.
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Abay, 90
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
62 Building of the Literary-Memorial Museum-House of. M. Dostoyevsky (the former home of postman Lipuhina, the writer F. M. Dostoevsky lived there in1857-1859). 1838.
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Dostoyevskogo, 118
63 The Memorial to the heroes of the revolution and the civil war. Sculptors A. V. Tikhomirov, O.S Klyushkin, A M. Semchenko, architect M. I. Mikhailov, 1977.
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Mamai batur
64 Double-minaret mosque. Architect Bolbatov, engineer Lieutenant Manashev. 1856-1862.
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Abaya, 50
65 One-minaret mosque. Master Gabulla Efendi. Second half of the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Semey, ul. Zhumabayeva, 17
66 Monument to the Hero of the Soviet Union T. Tohtarov. Sculptor P. V. Shishov, architects S. Rapoport, A. E. Martirosov. 1970.
urban development and architecture
Ridder, ul. Tokhtarova
67 The House where the writer M. Auezov was born. Second half of the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Abayskiy district, Borly setttlement, in the settlement area north east from Kaskabulak settlement
68 Complex of Abay Kunanbayev estate 1894-1904. (House, House-Museum of Abay, Tomb of Abay)
urban development and architecture
Abayskiy district, Borly setttlement, 23-25 km south from the settlement in the Zhidebay ravine
69 Kozy-Korpesh – Bayan-Sulu masar, IX-X century.
urban development and architecture
Ayaguzskiy district, Tarlauly settlement, 7 km southwest from the settlement on the right bank of the Ayaguz River, 11 km west from the Tansy rail station
70 Shilikty burial ground (57) VII-V centuries BC.
archaeology Zaisanskiy district, Shilikty settlement, 3 km southeast and 5 km northeast from the settlement
71 Mausoleum Of Zejnully. Master and builder Bayazit held. 1925.
urban development and architecture
Zaisanskiy district, Zholshi settlement, 0,5 km northeast from the settlement
72 Ruins of the Ablaket temple. 1654 г.
archaeology Ulanskiy district, Bozanbay settlement, 15 km southeast from the settlement
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
Zhambyl oblast
73 Taraz town. I-XIX centuries A.C.
archaeology Taraz, Central town market
74 Bridge over the River Talas. XIII century A.C.
urban development and architecture
Taraz, south-eastern edge of the city, where the ul. Samarkandskaya and ul. Zhangildina are coming to the River Talas, and near the Tekturmas complex
75 Cali Zhunus Bath. Beg. of the 20th century.
urban development and architecture
Taraz, ul. Baizak Batyr, 38, at the intersection with ul. Kazybek-bi
76 Mausoleum of Kara Khan. XI century.
urban development and architecture
Taraz city, in the Centre of the city, at the intersection of ul. Tole-bi and ul. Baizak Batyr
77 Tekturmas Mausoleum. X-XIV centuries.
urban development and architecture
Taraz, south-eastern edge of the city, the right bank of the River Talas, atop Tekturmas Mount
78 The Mausoleum of Shamansur (Davutbek). XIII century.
urban development and architecture
Taraz city, in the central part of the city, Karahan st, 1
79 Mosque-Madrasah of Abdukadyra, the beginning of XX century.
urban development and architecture
Taraz. ul. Abay., 5 at the intersection with ul. Koshenej
80 Zhunusbay mosque (Aulie-Ata), 1913.
urban development and architecture
Taraz, ul. Adambaeva, 24, at the intersection with ul. Kylymbaj-akyn
81 Nametay mosque. 1887, 1897.
urban development and architecture
Taraz, ul. Tashkent, 21, at the intersection with ul. Baizak Batyr
82 Statue of Zhambyl Zhabayev. Sculptor Kh. Nauryzbaev, architect V. Sashenko. 1961 г.
urban development and architecture
Taraz, Zhambyl square
83 Mound Nizhniy Bariskhan (Tortkol). VI-XII centuries.
archaeology Bayzak district, Talas, 1.5 km southeast of the village, on the right bank of the river Talas, 0.5 km north of Taraz-Almaty road
84 Tujmekent Settlement. VI-XII centuries.
archaeology Bayzak district, village of Tujmekent, South-eastern edge of the village, on the right bank of the river Talas Bazakskiy District, Tuimekent village, southeastern adge of the village on the right bank of River Talas
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
85 The Settlement Ohhum. VI-XII centuries.
archaeology Bayzak district, Shakhan, 13 km northeast of the village, 3 km to the west of the road Sambet-Bostandyk
86 Mausoleum of Aisha-Bibi. XI-XII centuries.
urban development and architecture
Zhambyl district, village of Aisha Bibi, in the centre of the village, 20 km west of Taraz
87 Babaji Khatun Mausoleum. X-XI centuries.
urban development and architecture
Zhambyl district, village of Aisha Bibi, in the centre of the village, 20 km west of Taraz
88 Architectural-archaeological complex of Akyrtas. VIII-XII centuries.
ensemble Zhambyl district, Aksholak rail station, 6 km south of the station, at the foots of the Kyrgyz Alatau range, 40 km East from the city of Taraz
89 Zhalpaktobe (Zhikil) settlement. VI-XII centuries.
archaeology Zhambyl district, Zhalpaktobe settlement
90 Burial mound Berkkara (500). 2nd century BC - 4th century AD.
archaeology Jualy, Karabastau village, 3 km south of the village
91 City of Merke. VII-XIII centuries.
archaeology Merki, merke village, Western suburb village
92 The monument to the twice Hero of the Socialist Labor Zh. Kuanishev. Sculptor B. Tulekov, architect T.K. Basenov. 1962.
urban development and architecture
Moiynkum district, Birlik, in front of the akimat building
93 Shokai Datka Mausoleum. XVIII century.
urban development and architecture
Sarysu district, village Saudakent, on the eastern outskirts of the village, on the old cemetery
94 Akkol Shell temporary settlement
archaeology Talas district, Akkol, 13 km west of the village, 8 km north of the Lake Akkol
95 Borikazgan Shell-ashel temporary settlement
archaeology Talas district, Kyzylaut, 8 km South-East of the village, 38 km North-East of Karatau
96 Tenirkazgan Shell-ashel temporary settlement
archaeology Talas district, Kyzylaut, 10 km South-East of the village, 34 kilometres north-east of karatau, 13-15 km east of r. Koktal
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
97 Karakozha Mosque. Beg. of the 20th century.
urban development and architecture
Talas district, village of Sejilbek, the eastern edge of the village
98 Abdullah Ishanah Mosque. Beg. Of the 20th century.
archaeology Talasskiy District, Usharal village, ul. Eshtaibeka, 7
99 Kulan settlement. VI - beginning of the 13th century.
archaeology Turar Ryskulov area, Kulan, Eastern and North-eastern edge of the village
100 Aktobe settlement. VI—XIII centuries.
archaeology Shui district, Aksu, 3 kilometres south-east of the village, on both banks of the river Aksu
Western Kazakhstan oblast
101 The building of the regional historical Museum (formerly the Russian-Kirghiz school). 1864.
urban development and architecture
Uralsk, Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 184
102 City-building complex, part of the old city of Uralsk from the city centre to ul. Pugachyov XVII-XX centuries: (building of the regional Akimat (formerly Commerce Bank), 1896; building of the clinics of the Department of Internal Affairs (the former home of nakaznyh atamans), 1823, building of the regional Philharmonic, ul. Kurmangaliyev (former home of Karev), 1901; building of the Gaidar library (former army utility Board), 1869; the Cathedral of Michael the Archangel, 1740-1751; the building of the Military Prosecutor's Office (the former model urban Homestead). 1878; Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, architect V. N. Chagin, 1891-1907)
ensemble Uralsk, Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 184; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 179; ul. N. Savicheva, 43; ul. Kareva, 47; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, Prospect 166; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 63; city district "Kureni"; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 147; Prospect Dostyk-Druzhba, 202
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
103 The Chapayev museum complex; 1919. (25th Chapayev Division headqiaters (museum), 1919; place of V. I. Chapaev death, 1919; mass grave of Chapayev Division soldiers, 1957)
urban development and architecture
Akzhikskiy District, Chapayevo village, Culture and Recreation Park, monuments alley
104 Dwelling house (Urdinskaya Publishing House from 1918, later dwelling house). Second half of the 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Bokeyordinskiy District, Orda village, ul. Abdully Tenizbayeva, 19
105 Bust of the Hero of the Soviet Union M. Mametova. Sculptors Yu.P. Pommer, N.A. Kovalchuk. 1971 г.
urban development and architecture
Zhanibekskiy District, Zhanibek village, ul. Utemisova, 26
Karaganda Oblast
106 Monument to the Hero of the Soviet Union N. Abdirov, Sculptors A.P. Bilyk, Yu.V. Grummel, architect L.E. Vorobiov. 1958 г.
urban development and architecture
Karaganda, Prospect N. Abdirova
107 Begazy burial. XII-X centuries BC
archaeology Aktogay district, Begazy village, 1 km west of the village on the right bank of the Begazy river, 18 km above its confluence with the river Tokyrau, 40 km South-East from Aktogai village
108 Group burials Aidarly. Late bronze age-early iron age
archaeology Zhanaarka district, Ajshyrak, 2 km west of the village, on the right bank of the Atasu river, in the Valley of Aksay
109 Cemetery of Sangru (Sanguyr) (II) (150). Bronze age-early iron age
archaeology Zhanaarka district, Ajshyrak, 5.5 km west of the village, 4 km northwest of Darat homesteading, Sanguyr natural landmark in the upper reaches of Atasu river.
110 Ajshyrak burial ground (102). Bronze age
archaeology Zhanaarka district, Aktau village, 20 km north of the village, on the left bank of the Atasu river, 93 km to the southeast of the Karazhal mine
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
111 Cemetery of Sangru (Sanguyr) 1 (40). The era of the late bronze age
archaeology Zhanaarka district, Aktau village, 45 km to the East of the village, in the Sanguyr natural landmark, 3 km North-East of the Darat natural landmark
112 Mausoleum of Juban-Ana. XI-XII centuries.
urban development and architecture
Zhanaarka district, Monadyr rail station, 12 km to the Northwest of the station, on the right bank of the Sarysu river
113 Tomb of the folk composer Madi Bapiuly (1880-1921)
urban development and architecture
Karkaraly district, Karkaralinsk, 0.2 km north of the city, the Akbejt cemetery
114 The ruins of the Kzylkent Palace. XIV-XV centuries.
archaeology Karkaraly district, Kent village, 3 km east of the village on the river Kzylsu, a tributary of r. Taldy in the Kent mountains, 40 km South-East from Karkaralinsk
115 The Mausoleum of Ajranbay (Beskumbez). 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Algabas village, 35 km south of the village, on the right bank of the Sarysengir river
116 Mausoleum of Ayakhamyr. XI-XII centuries
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Zhezdy village, 9 km northwest of the village on the left bank of the Zhezdy river
117 Alasha-Khan mausoleum. XI-XII centuries.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 2 km southwest of the village on the right bank of the Karakengir river
118 Zhoshi-Khan (Jochi-Khan) mausoleum, 1st half of XIII century.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 28 km south-east of the village, on the left bank of the Kengir River, 50 km northeast of Zhezkazgan
119 The Mausoleum Of Duzena (Zhuzden). Master: Emanuly Seraly. 1863-1866.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 30 km to the north-west of the village, on the right bank of the Karakengir river
120 The ritual structure of Dombaul. VIII-IX cent.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 24 km south-east of the village, on the right bank of the Kengir River, 55 km northeast of Zhezkazgan
121 Labak Mausoleum. 19th century.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 20 kilometres south-east of the village, on the left bank of the Karakengir
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
river
122 Ketebay Mausoleum. 1898 г. urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Melshibay village, 20 kilometres south-east of the village, on the left bank of the Karakengir river
123 Bolgan-Ana mausoleum. The 12th and 13th centuries.
urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Talap village, 30 km South-East of the village
124 Ancient settlement Baskamyr IX-XII centuries.
archaeology Ulytau district, Taldysay, 0.5 km South-East of the village, 18 km north of Zhezdy settlement, on the left bank of the Zhezdy river at the mouth of the Taldysay river
125 Makat mausoleum 1923 urban development and architecture
Ulytau district, Shenber village, 8 km northwest of the village
126 Burial ground Taldy, 1 (48). XIV-XI centuries B.C.
archaeology Shetskiy district, Zhanazhurt village, 10 km North-East of the village, on the left bank of the Taldy river
127 Burial Buguly II (Kusmurun) (57). Late Bronze-early iron age
archaeology Shetkiy district, Zharyk rail station, 40 km North-East of the station, on the Bank of the Shop river, off the North-East, at the foot of Mount Buguly
Kostanay Oblast
128 Bust of the twice Hero of the Soviet Union P.I Beda. Sculptor D.P Shwartz. 1951
urban development and architecture
Kostanaj, ul. Pushkina, 98
129 Bust of the twice Hero of the Soviet Union I.A. Pavlov. Sculptor D.P Shwartz. 1952
urban development and architecture
Kostanaj, ul. Pushkina, 98
130 Monument to I. Altynsarinu The sculptor N. Shcherbakov, architects I. A. Pokrovsky, D. D. Gorchinskij. 1970.
urban development and architecture
г. Kostanaj, ul. Altynsarina, 118-a, near the Museum of Altynsarin.
131 Residential house in which A. Imanov was proclaimed leader of the 1916 uprising. Master Ajmagambet-mouth. The beginning of XX century.
urban development and architecture
Amangeldi district, Amangeldy village, ul. Mailina, 16
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
132 The ritualistic structure of Ekidyn. VII-IX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Within the Arkalyk City Akimat area, Ekidyn village, 1.5 km North-East of the village, on the right bank of the Karaturgaj river
133 The ritualistic structure of Ekidyn II. VII—IX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Within the Arkalyk City Akimat area, Ekidyn village, 0.5 km North-East of the village, on the left bank of the Karaturgaj river
Kysylorda oblast
134 Bust I. Zhakhayev, the twice Hero of the Socialist Labour. Sculptor A. Pekarev. Architects A. Boretskiy and K. Kulbasheva. 1975
urban development and architecture
Kyzylorda, ul. Ibraya Zhahaeva, near school No. 4. Named after S. Seifullin
135 The Mosque of Ajtbay. Masters Iskhan and Kamal. 1878.
urban development and architecture
Kyzylorda, ul. Satpayeva, 18
136 Church of Christ The Savior XIX century.
urban development and architecture
Kyzylorda, ul. Isy Toktybayeva,5
137 Urban settlement Zhent (Zhankala) V—XVII centuries.
archaeology Zhalagashskiy district, village of Akkyr, 30 km south of the village, on the right bank of the Zhanadar river, 2 km from the main channel
138 The Mausoleum Mulkalan (Mulla-Kalan). XVI century.
urban development and architecture
Zhalagashskiy district, Zhanadarya village, 3 km to the South-East of the village
139 Mausoleum of Kara-Zopa. XVIII-XIX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Zhanakorgan region, Zhanakorgan village, 5 km South-East of the village
140 Mausoleum of Ajkozhi. XVIII-XIX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Zhanakorgan region, Besaryk rail station, 6 km south of the station
141 Aktas mosque. 1884. urban development and architecture
Zhanakorgan region, Besaryk rail station, 6 km south of the station
142 Urban settlement Sagynak (Sunakata). VI—XIX centuries.
archaeology Zhanakorgan district, Sunakata village, 2 km northwest of the village
143 Begin-An tower. XI century. urban development and architecture
Kazalinskiy district, Kazaklinsk, 10 km east of the city
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
144 Complex of city buildings is a historic part of the city of Kazalinsk, end of XIX-beginning of XX century (House of Ganibaya, 19th century; the building of the Memorial Museum of G. Muratbaev (former building of Soviet Department), end of XIX - beginning of XX centuries; the building of the city library (the former Ganibaya mosque), 19th century; Nogai mosque (mosque Nuraly), 19th century)
urban development and architecture
Kazalinskiy district, Kazalinsk, in the courtyard of the school № 7, ul. Korkyta-ata, 24; ul. Chaliapina, 17; ul. Zhanuzakova, 51
145 Building of the district House of Culture named after R. Baglanova (former Church). 1904.
urban development and architecture
Kazalinskiy district, Kazaklinsk, ul. Aiteke-bi, 1
146 Saraman-Kosa (Sharman-Hodge) Tower. XI century.
urban development and architecture
Kazalinskiy district, Kaukej village, 2 km North-East of the village
147 Mausoleum of Kuttybay. The 17th-20th centuries.
urban development and architecture
Kazalinskiy district, Urkendeu village, 5 km from the village
148 Ancient settlement Zhankent (Yangikent). V-XV centuries.
archaeology Kazalinskiy district, Urkendeu village, 0.5 km South-East of the village, on the left bank of the Syrdarya River
149 Mausoleum of Balanda 2. VI-II cent. BC.
urban development and architecture
Karmakchinskij district, village of Kuandarya, 15 kilometres south-west of the village
150 Mausoleum of Syrly-tam on Zhanadarya. XII — XIII centuries.
urban development and architecture
Karmakchinskij district, Tagai, 16 km north-east of the village
151 Urban settlement Zhetiasar 3 (Altynasar). I century B.C. — beginning of VIII century.
archaeology Karmakchinskij district, village of Turmagambet, 12 km northwest of the village, in the Zhetyasar natural landmark, by the dry bed of the Kuandarya River
152 Kutebar tower. XIX cent. urban development and architecture
Sirdarya region, Akzharma village, 10 km west of the village, at grave-yard of the abandoned village Shirkejli.
153 Sarly-tam mausoleum on Inkadarya. XIII cent.
urban development and architecture
Sirdarya region, Inkardaya village, 25 km south of the village
154 Asan-ata mausoleum. XVI cent.
urban development and architecture
Chiiliyskiy district, rail station Bajgekum, 5 km east of the station
Mangistau oblast
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
155 The necropolis of old Beineu XI-XIX centuries. (Beket-ata underground mosque; mausoleums (2); sagana (24) kulpytas; sagana (9); kulpytas (26), kojtas (15) koshkartas (1); koitas, kulpytas (14); fence, kulpytas (8); (2) pyramid; the sarcophagus, kulpytas (5); sarcophagus (7); wall (6); Stella (5); fence, stela (5)
ensemble Beyneu district, rail station Beineu, 17 km South-West of the station
156 Omar and Tur mausoleum. 1898
urban development and architecture
Beyneu district, rail station Beineu, 20 km to the East of the station
157 Beket-ata underground mosque in the Oglandy area. XVIII century
urban development and architecture
Karakiya district, Senek village, 95 km North-East of the village
158 The necropolis of Kyzylsu, XVIII-XX centuries. ((1) mosque, mausoleum (1); sagana (54); kulpytas (3); koitas (11); koitas, kulpytas (1); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (1); pyramid (26); sarcophagus (4); fence (9); stela (2)
urban development and architecture
Karakiya district, Senek village, 21 km North-East of the village
159 The necropolis of Senek XVII-XX centuries. (the mausoleum (3); Sagan (30); pyramid (1)
ensemble Karakiya district, Senek village, 1 km south of the village
160 Shopan-ata necropolis X-XIX centuries. (underground mosque (1); (6) Sagan (209) kulpytas, Sagan (7); kulpytas (65); koitas (680) koitas, kulpytas (149), kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (5); kulpytas, pyramid (50) fence, kulpytas (52); pyramid (54); sarcophagus, kulpytas (21); sarcophagus (59); fence (210); stone mound (50); stela (58); fence, stela (24)
ensemble Karakiya district, Senek village, 12 km North-East of the village
161 The necropolis of Kyrgyn of the 19th-20th centuries. (mausoleum (1) Sagan (3) kulpytas (1); koitas (15) pyramid (6).
ensemble Karakiya district, Old Zhetybai village, 5 km west of the village
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
162 Sisem-ata necropolis XIII — XIX centuries (mausoleum (24); sagana (138); kulpytas, sagana (17); kulpytas (81); koitas (159); koshkartas (1); kulpytas, koitas (148); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (20); kulpytas, pyramid (22) fence, kulpytas (79); pyramid (3); sarcophagus, kulpytas (17); sarcophagus (129); fence (133); stone mound (70); stela (236)
ensemble Mangystau district, rail station Sai-Utes, 35 km North of the station, 2.5 km east of the western escarpment of the Ustyurt Plateau
163 The necropolis of Ouali XI-XX centuries. (mosque (1); (1) sagana (6); kulpytas, sagana (2); kulpytas (16), (18); koitas, kulpytas (7); kulpytas, pyramid (2); fence, kulpytas (27); pyramid (12); sarcophagus, kulpytas (2); sarcophagus (4); fence (92); stone mound (44); stela (52); fence, stela (42)
ensemble Mangystau district, rail station Sai-Utes, 60 km North-East of the station, 5 km northwest of passing siding №6
164 The necropolis of Karamola (Shytsha, Tobekuduk), XII-XV centuries. (mausoleum (1); sagana (1); koitas (107); sarcophagus (5); fence (13) stonemound (7)
ensemble Mangystau district, p. Tauchik village, 20 km north of the village
165 Underground mosque and necropolis of Shakpak-ata IX-X and XIV-XIX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Mangystau district, Tauchik village, 45 km North-East of the village, 6 km south of Sarytas area, Shilikuduk mount area
166 Masat-ata necropolis X-XIX centuries. (mosque (1); (5) Sagan (28); kulpytas, sagana (3), kulpytas (18) koitas (309); koshkartas (1); kulpytas, koitas (48); kulpytas, pyramid (8); fence, kulpytas (5); the sarcophagus, kulpytas (6); sarcophagus (25); fence (42); stone mound (7); stela (16); fence, stela (4)
ensemble Mangystau district, Ushtagan villager, 20 km South-East of the village
167 Kapasha Mosque. Master: Kapash Kinakumy. 1928.
ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 35 km north of the village
168 Mangystau district, p., 35 km north of Shetpe village
ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village 17 км east of the village
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
169 The necropolis of Beki XVIII — XIX centuries (mausoleum (3); sagana (13); kulpytas (7); koitas (35); koitas, kulpytas (6); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (2); kulpytas, pyramid (5); fence, kulpytas (5); pyramid (5); sarcophagus, kulpytas (2); sarcophagus (4); fence (8); stone mound (7); stela (9); fence, stela (6)
ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 25 km to the South of the village
170 Kara-Tobe necropolis of XVIII-XX centuries (sagana (20); kulpytas (40); koitas (22); koitas, kulpytas (63); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (1); kulpytas, pyramid (3); fence, kulpytas (3); sarcophagus, kulpytas (4); sarcophagus (3); fence (39); stone mound (8); stela (19)
ensemble Mangistau district, Tuschykuduk village, 30 km east of the village
171 Karaman-ata necropolis XIII — XIX centuries. (underground mosque; (3) sagana (41); kulpytas, sagana (2); kulpytas (17); koitas (132); koitas, kulpytas (52); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (5); kulpytas, pyramid (7); fence, kulpytas (6); pyramid (10); sarcophagus, kulpytas (1); sarcophagus (33); fencing (55); stone mound (40); stela (38); fence, stela (30)
ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 40 km North-East of the village
172 The necropolis of Kamysbaj XV-XIX centuries. (mausoleum (12); sagana (54); kulpytas (10); koitas (99); koitas, kulpytas (83); kulpytas, koitas, sarcophagus (3); fence, kulpytas (11); pyramid (40); sarcophagus, kulpytas (1); sarcophagus (10); fence (51); stone mound (11); stela (33); fence, stela (12)
ensemble Mangystau district, Shetpe village, 14 km east of the village
173 Dwelling house. Master Idris Serkebayev. 1940.
urban development and architecture
Tupkaragan district, Fort-Shevchenko, ul. M. Abdyhalykova, 58
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
174 The necropolis of Bisembay XVII-XIX centuries (mausoleum (2); sagana (16); koitas (21); koitas, kulpytas (13); kulpytas, fence (2); pyramid (1); sarcophagus (1); fence (17); stone mound (5); stela (5)
urban development and architecture
Tupkaragan district, Fort-Shevchenko, 25 km east of the city
175 Memorial of Taras Shevchenko (1847-1857). 1932 (dugout of Shevchenko; House Museum, 1853; well; the bust of Taras Shevchenko, 1888)
urban development and architecture
Tupkaragan district, Fort-Shevchenko, Park named after T. G. Shevchenko, ul. B. Mayauly, 7
Pavlodar oblast
176 The building of the regional historical Museum (formerly the Trade House of Merchant Derov). 1899.
urban development and architecture
Pavlodar, ul. Lenina, 149
177 Tomb of the folk composer Yestai (1874-1946). 1946.
urban development and architecture
Aktogay district, Mutkenova village, 4 km south of the village
178 Tomb of the folk composer Zhayau Musa (1835-1929). 1929.
urban development and architecture
Bayanaul district, village of Zhanatlek, 30 km to the South-West of the village, in the desert
North Kazakhstan oblast
179 House of Ablai (military infirmary, barracks). 1829.
urban development and architecture
Petropavlovsk, ul Teatralnaya, 16
180 The building of the regional Finance Department (the former home of the merchant Yangurazov, school from 1988; from 2005 - the Office of the spiritual Association of Muslims of Kazakhstan). The beginning of XX century
urban development and architecture
Petropavlovsk, ul Ulyanova, 94
181 The building of the Museum of fine arts (former home of the merchant Yuzefovich). 1909.
urban development and architecture
Petropavlovsk, ul. 314 Strelkovoj Divisiy, 83
182 Monument to Karasay and Agyntay batyrs. 1999.
urban development and architecture
Petropavlovsk, Theatre square
183 Memorial to Karasay and Agyntay batyrs. 1999.
urban development and architecture
Aiyrtau district, karasay village, 4 km South-East of the village
184 Settlement Botai. XXIV-XXII century BC
archaeology Aiyrtau district, village of Nikolskoye, 1.5 km southeast of the village, on the right bank of the Iman-Burlyk river
185 Syrymbet Manor (Manor Of Valihanov). 19th century.
urban development and Aiyrtau district, Syrymbet village, 3 km to the South-East of the
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
architecture village
South Kazakhstan oblast
186 Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi. The end of the 14th century.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan, South-Eastern part of the city, in the settlement of Turkestan
187 Urban settlement of Kultobe, mid 1st cent. - XIV cent.
archaeology Turkestan, 350 m south of the mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi
188 Urban settlement of Turkestan XV—XIX cent.
archaeology Turkestan city, in the South-East of the modern city
189 Large Hilvet. XII cent. urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, 150 m south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in Turkestan, necropolis
190 Hilvet of Aulye Kumchik-ata. XII cent.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan, 1 km south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka
191 Chillyahana (shidehana). XIV cent.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, 22 m Northwest of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in Turkestan, necropolis
192 The octahedral mausoleum XIV-XVI centuries.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan, 40 m to the South of East minaret Ahmed Yasavi hanaka
193 The Mausoleum of Sultan Begim. XV cent.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, 60 m South-West of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in the Turkestan medieval necropolis
194 Nameless mausoleum (crypt) XVI.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, 45 metres south-west of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka in Turkestan, necropolis
195 Wall of the fortified Citadel. XVI-XIX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, eastern part of the Citadel fortifications, Turkestan urban settlement
196 Eastern bath. XVI-XVIII centuries.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, 150 m to the South-South-West of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka
197 Mausoleum of Esim Khan. XVII cent.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan city, 12 m south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka minaret in the West, on the site of the medieval necropolis of Turkestan
198 Gate of the Citadel. XVIII-XIX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Turkestan, eastern side of the Citadel fortifications, Turkestan
199 Juma Mosque. 19th century. urban development and architecture
Turkestan, 150 m south of Ahmed Yasavi hanaka, next to Large Hilvet
200 Complex of railway station, 1903 (station; Home Depot; living; ice stores)
urban development and architecture
Turkestan rail station
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
201 Sauran urban settlement XIII—XVIII cent.
archaeology The territory of the Turkestan maslikhat, Sauran village, 9 km northwest of the village, 40 miles northwest of Turkestan
202 Karasu temporary settlement (named after Ch. Valikhanov), Mustye
archaeology Baidibek district, Karasu village, 2 km northwest of the village, on the right bank of the Arystandy river
203 The architectural complex Appak Ishanah XIX (mosque, madrasa, darshana)
urban development and architecture
Baidibek district, Shayan village, the western edge of the village
204 The architectural complex of Ismail-ata, XI-XIX centuries. (mausoleum of Ismail-ata, middle ages; Zhabraila mausoleum, XIX century: Koshkar-ata mausoleum, middle ages; mosque, the later Middle Ages; chillyahana, the middle ages, the gates 19th century.)
urban development and architecture
Kazygurt district, Turbat village, in the Centre of the village on the territory of the necropolis, on the north side
205 Arystanbab Mausoleum. The beginning of XX century.
urban development and architecture
Otyrar district, Kogam village, 3 km North-North-West of the village
206 Urban settlement Okyz (Oksus) I—XIV cent.
archaeology Otyrar district, Mayakum village, 8 km north of the village in the Akzhar natural landmark, on the left bank of the Syrdarya River
207 Otrar settlement I-XVIII centuries
archaeology Otyrar district, Talapty village, on the south-eastern outskirts of the village
208 Sairam (Isfidzhab) settlement VIII-XVII centuries
archaeology Sairam district, Sairam village, in the village, in the floodplain on the right bank of the River Sayramsu
209 Abdel Azizbaba Mausoleum. Mid XIX century.
urban development and architecture
Sairam district, Sairam village, the northern part of the village, in the centre of the old cemetery
210 Ibrahim Ata Mausoleum. XVII-beginning of XX century
urban development and architecture
Sairam district, Sairam village, in the north-western outskirts of the village, on a hill near the road to the village Aksu
211 Mausoleum of Khoja Taliga. XIX century.
urban development and architecture
Sairam district, Sairam village, in the centre of the village, 300 meters east of the intersection of Lenin and
№№ Name of Monument Monument Type Monument Location
Communisticheskaya streets
212 Mausoleum of Mirali-baba. End of XIX century
urban development and architecture
Sairam district, Sairam village, in the old cemetery, 250 meters west of the intersection of Lenin and Communisticheskaya streets
213 Mausoleum Karashash analysis. XVIII century.
urban development and architecture
Sairam district, Sairam village, in the village centre, in the old cemetery, 250 meters west of the intersection of Lenin and Communisticheskaya streets
214 Minaret Hyzr Payghambar. XVIII-XIX centuries.
urban development and architecture
Sairam district, Sairam village, in the centre of the village, 200 meters southeast of the intersection of Lenin and Communisticheskaya streets
215 Madrassas. End of XIX century.
urban development and architecture
Suzak district, Baba-Ata village, on the outskirts of the village
216 Mosque-mausoleum Baba-ata the end of XIX century.
urban development and architecture
Suzak district, Baba-Ata village, on the left bank of the river. Baba-Ata, in the settlement
217 Castle ruins. VI-X centuries. archaeology Suzak district, Baba-Ata, on the left bank of the Baba-Ata river, in the settlement
218 Mosque Nogai-Ishan XIX century.
urban development and architecture
Suzak district, Suzak, in the village centre
Table C - 2: National List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage
№ Name of an element Category of an element/ ICH domain
1 Nauryz Social practices, rituals and festive events
2 Hunting with birds of prey (eagles, hawks and etc.)
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
3 Aitys – art of music and poetic improvisation as a contest between akyns
Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
4 Traditional knowledge and skills of manufacturing Kiyiz Yui/Yurt.
Traditional craftsmanship
5 Kazakh traditional art of performing dombra kuy
Performing arts
6 Art of music performance on Kazakh national stringed instrument Kobyz
Performing arts
7 Kazakh traditional art of singing Performing arts
8 Batyrlan zhyry/ Heroic epics - Cycle of 50 Kazakh heroic epics:
Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
o Alpamys batyr
o Kobylandy batyr
o Yer targyn
o Yer Edige
o Kambar batyr
o Karabek batyr
o Kokshe batyr
o Son of Kokshe Er Kosay
o Son of Aisa Akhmet batyr
o Alau batyr
o Tama batyr
o Karasay-kazy
o Yer Zhanibek
o Ensegei boily er Yessim
o Aidos batyr
o Zhetigen batyr
o Sabalak Abylaikhan
o Olzhash batyr
o Kabylan batyr
o Myrza Satbek batyr
o Orakty batyr
o Bogenbay batyr
o Kissa yer Kabanbay
o Yer Zhassybay
o Zhidebay batyr
o Olzhabay batyr
o Otegen batyr
o Rayimbek batyr
№ Name of an element Category of an element/ ICH domain
o Zhanibek batyr
o Myrky batyr
o Barak batyr
o Kokzharly Barak batyr
o Bazar batyr
o Berdikozha batyr
o Zhantay batyr
o Syrym batyr
o Yer Azhibay
o Arkalyk batyr
o Yer Kenesary
o Agybay batyr
o Yessenkeldi batyr
o Iman batyr
o Zhankozha batyr
o Sauryk batyr
o Suranshy batyr
o Bayseyit batyr
o Myrzash batyr
o Shayan batyr
o Kozheke batyr
o Beket batyr
9 Kyz Zhibek – Kazakh lyric and epic poem Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
10 The book of Korkyt Ata – Kazakh epic Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
11 Kazakh zergerligi – knowledge and skills of Kazakh traditional jewellery making
Traditional craftsmanship
12 Kokpar – Kazakh national horse-riding sports game
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
13 Kazakh kuresy – Kazakh national style of wrestling
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
14 Kiyiz basu – traditional art of manufacturing felt Traditional craftsmanship 15 Besik – traditions of manufacturing and using
Kazakh traditional baby cradle Traditional craftsmanship
16 Kymyz – technologies of manufacturing and meaning of Kumys, Kazakh traditional dairy product made from fermented horse milk
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
17 Kozy Korpesh – Bayan Sulu - Kazakh lyric and epic poem
Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
18 Zhetigen – technologies of manufacturing traditional polycord stringed musical instrument and art of performing on it
Performing arts
19 Sybyzgy – technologies of manufacturing traditional wind musical instrument and art of performing on it
Performing arts
20 Shankobyz – technologies of manufacturing traditional reed musical instrument and art of playing on it
Performing arts
№ Name of an element Category of an element/ ICH domain
21 Orteke – Kazakh traditional art of music puppetry
Performing arts
22 Kara Zhorga – folk dance Performing arts
23 Terme – singing and recitative genre of Kazakh folklore
Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
24 Komei – Kazakh traditional art of throat singing and reciting
Performing arts
25 Togyzkumalak/9 stones – Kazakh traditional board game
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
26 Kazakh traditional art of carpet weaving Traditional craftsmanship
27 Shubat – technologies of manufacturing and meaning of the national dairy product Shubat made of camel milk
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
28 Kara Olen – genre of lyric singing Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
29 Baksy Saryny – ritual ceremonial song of Kazakh shamans, followed by dancing
Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
30 Keste – Kazakh embroidery on various materials Traditional craftsmanship
31 Tekement – tradition of manufacturing felt carpet
Traditional craftsmanship
32 Teri ondeu – traditions and technologies of manufacturing leather products
Traditional craftsmanship
33 Er-turman – technologies of manufacturing horse harnesses
Traditional craftsmanship
34 Asyk – national game Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
35 Kazakh national cousine Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
36 Shildekhana – Kazakh ceremonies related to the birth of a child:
Social practices, rituals and festive events
Besik toyi
Kyrkynan shygaru
Tusau kesu
Ashamayga mingizu
37 Betashar – Kazakh wedding ceremonies: Social practices, rituals and festive events
qoshtasu
synsu
betashar
toybastar
zhar-zhar
38 Zhoktau – funeral rites Social practices, rituals and festive
№ Name of an element Category of an element/ ICH domain
estirtu events
konil aitu
korisu
zhoktau
aryzdasu
39 Sayis – national horse-racing games: Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
Audaryspak
Kyz kuu
Tenge alu
Zhaby atu
Zhorga zharys
40 Sheshendik sozder – oratory skills Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
41 Kazakh traditional wearing – technologies of manufacturing and meaning:
Traditional craftsmanship
Saukele
KImeshek
Taqiya
Shapan and etc.
42 Kazakhtyn zhylnamasy – Kazakh calendar of 12-year animal cycle
Knowledge and practices concerning nature and the universe
43 Anecdotes and tales of Kozhanassyr/Hodja Nasreddin
Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
44 “Keroglu” epic Oral traditions and expressions, including language as a vehicle of the intangible cultural heritage
45 Traditional games for children and youngsters – “Bes tas”, “Tympi”, “Sokyr teke”, “Ak suyek”, “Altybakan”, “Akterek pen kok terek and etc.)
обычаи, обряды, празднества
46 Art of manufacturing Kazakh music instrument Dombyra
Traditional craftsmanship
Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review
Appendix D – Compliance of the KazREFF Renewable Energy Scenarios against the SER Objectives
Table D-1: Compliance of the KazREFF Renewable Energy Scenarios against the SER Objectives Key Performance is based on the number or proportion of receptors linked to each SER Objective for which significant effects have been predicted Significant negative performance against SER Objective
or
Significant positive performance against SER Objective
or
Insignificant negative performance against SER Objective
or Insignificant positive performance against SER Objective
or
No Effects Uncertain ?
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar Photovoltaic
Biogas
Climate and air quality
Contribute to reduction of GHG emission
Climate
Reduction of GHG emission can be achieved
through replacement of
fossil fuel related energy by renewable
energy
Reduction of GHG emission can be achieved
through replacement of
fossil fuel related energy by renewable
energy
Reduction of GHG emission can be achieved
through replacement of
fossil fuel related energy by renewable
energy
Capping/covering existing open
landfills can significantly
decrease methane
emissions.
Reduction of GHG emission can be achieved
through replacement of
fossil fuel related energy by renewable
energy
Contribute to improved air quality
Air quality
Improvement of air quality
can be achieved through
replacement of fossil fuel
related energy by renewable
Improvement of air quality
can be achieved through
replacement of fossil fuel
related energy by renewable
Improvement of air quality
can be achieved through
replacement of fossil fuel
related energy by renewable
Capping/covering existing open
landfills can significantly air
quality.
Improvement of air quality can
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
energy
energy
energy
be achieved through
replacement of fossil fuel
related energy by renewable
energy.
Design modifications can mitigate
potential emissions of
hazardous air pollutants.
Comply with EU and Kazakh air quality regulations
Air quality
Compliance of air quality regulation can be achieved as practice is established.
Compliance of air quality regulation can be achieved as practice is established.
Compliance of air quality regulation can be achieved as practice is established.
Compliance of air quality regulation can be achieved as practice is established.
Surface water and groundwater
Minimise adverse impacts to surface/ground water quality
Surface Water quality Groundwater quality
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater quality.
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater quality.
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater quality.
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater quality.
Minimise adverse impacts to water resource
Surface Water Resource Groundwater
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
or
Even with successful
implementation of mitigation
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
Pollution prevention,
erosion control measures, and
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
s Resource
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater resource.
measures, there will be potential
to change to surface water
resource at impoundment
or between intake and
outflow of run-of-river systems.
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater resource.
siting constraints will avoid adverse
effects on surface and
groundwater resource.
Maintain ecologically-viable base flows in waterways
Surface Water Resource Aquatic species
Projects will not impact aquatic
species.
or
Lengths of river at structure or downstream
may be affected by low flows
with effects on fisheries and other uses.
Projects will not impact aquatic
species.
Projects will not impact aquatic
species.
Geology and soils
Minimise loss of use of high quality arable soils and impacts of soil nutrient depletion
High value soil
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should minimize loss of high value soils.
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should minimize loss of high value soils.
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should minimize loss of high value soils.
Candidate development landfills are
already degraded with little to no high
value soils.
Avoid the weakening of soil/streambanks resulting in mudflo
Various receptors in Mudflow Hazard Areas
Siting constraints will avoid placing
facilities in mudflow prone
areas
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should minimize loss of
Siting constraints will avoid placing
facilities in mudflow prone
areas
Siting constraints will avoid placing
facilities in mudflow prone
areas
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
ws high value soils
Landscape and biodiversity
Minimise adverse impacts to wildlife, protected species, and their habitat
Protected areas
Bird and bat
Important terrestrial species
Important Aquatic species
Unprotected natural ecosystems
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should significantly
minimise impacts to
wildlife, and protected
species, and their habitat.
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should significantly
minimise impacts to
wildlife, and protected
species, and their habitat
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should significantly
minimise impacts to
wildlife, and protected
species, and their habitat
Candidate development landfills are
already degraded with
little to no wildlife and habitat area.
Avoid adverse impacts to designated conservation sites
Protected areas
IBA
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impact on designated
conservation sites.
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impact on designated
conservation sites.
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impact on designated
conservation sites
Candidate development landfills are
already degraded and would not be designated as conservation
sites
Avoid impacts to scenic/aesthetic areas
High quality landscape value
Due to the scenario scale
and the area of land-take it is
not likely to be possible to fully mitigate/offset
for the landscape &
visual effects of
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid or significantly
minimise impact on landscape &
visually
or
Due to the scenario scale
and the area of land-take it is
not likely to be possible to completely
mitigate/offset for the
landscape &
or
Candidate development landfills are
already degraded areas with little to no scenic/aesthetic
value. However,
capping/coveri
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
large wind farms.
aesthetic areas visual effects of large solar PV
facilities; however, some visual screening
will minimise these impacts. .
ng existing open landfills can improve the
aesthetics of the area. .
Community and socio-economics.
Minimize the physical displacement of people
Demographics
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid displacement. However, if
unavoidable, impacts will be minimised by
mitigation measures
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid displacement.
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid displacement. However, if
unavoidable, impacts will be minimised by
mitigation measures
Candidate development landfills are
already degraded areas and are unlikely
to provide living areas for
people.
Minimise impacts to important areas for hunting, fishing, tourism, and recreation
Tourism or
Application mitigation measures
should avoid impact to the
areas.
There might be positive effect
on environmental
image and ecotourism potential through
improved energy
reliability for economic
or
Careful siting of project could
avoid impact to the areas.
There might be positive effect
on environmental
image and ecotourism potential through
improved energy
reliability for economic
development.
or
Careful siting of project could
avoid impact to the areas.
There might be positive effect
on environmental
image and ecotourism potential through
improved energy
reliability for economic
development.
or
Candidate development
landfills are not likely to be
tourist areas or have significant
recreational value.
However, capping/covering existing open
landfills can improve the
tourism potential of the
surrounding areas.
There might be positive effect
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
development. on environmental
image and ecotourism potential through
improved energy
reliability for economic
development.
Minimise impacts to human health from noise, vibrations, odour, lighting, or sanitation
Human Health
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts from
noise and vibration.
However, if unavoidable,
impacts will be minimised by
mitigation measures.
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts from
noise and vibration.
However, if unavoidable,
impacts will be minimised by
mitigation measures.
or
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts from
reflections. However, if
unavoidable, impacts will be minimised by
mitigation measures.
Capping/covering existing open
landfills can decrease odours and improve the sanitation of the
surrounding areas.
Improve employment and standard of living
Employment Economy
Increased local employment opportunities
can be maximised,
mainly during construction but also operation.
Increased local employment opportunities
can be maximised,
mainly during construction but also operation.
Increased local employment opportunities
can be maximised,
mainly during construction but also operation.
Increased local employment opportunities
can be maximised,
mainly during construction but also operation.
Avoid impacts to water supply
Employment Econom
Application of siting
or
Application of siting
Application of siting
Application of siting
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
for potable use, fisheries, and irrigation
y constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts to water supply, fisheries and irrigation.
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts from
noise and vibration.
However, if unavoidable,
impacts will be minimised by
mitigation measures
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts to water supply, fisheries and irrigation.
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impacts to water supply, fisheries and irrigation.
Material Assets
Avoid impacts to existing infrastructure
Infrastructure
or
New development might require improvements
to existing transportation infrastructure.
Can provide increased
reliability for electricity in remote area.
or
New development would require
improving existing
transportation infrastructure.
Can provide increased
reliability for electricity in remote area.
or
New development would require
improving existing
transportation infrastructure.
Can provide increased
reliability for electricity in remote area.
or
New development would require
improving existing
transportation infrastructure.
Avoid impacts resulting from increased vehicular traffic
or
Minor increases in traffic would
be limited to construction
period. Impact will be
minimised through
mitigation measures.
or
Minor increases in traffic would
be limited to construction
period. Impact will be
minimised through
mitigation measures.
or
Minor increases in traffic would
be limited to construction
period. Impact will be
minimised through
mitigation measures.
or
Minor increases in traffic would
be limited to construction
period. Impact will be
minimised through
mitigation measures.
Environmental Topic
SER Objective: Does the proposed development of the KAZREFF renewable scenario…
Receptors
Wind Small hydro Solar
Photovoltaic Biogas
Cultural heritage
Avoid impacts to cultural and archaeologically important areas
UNESCO World Heritage Sites and sites on the UNESCO Tentative List
Registered cultural heritage sites.
Unregistered or unknown cultural heritage sites
or
?
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impact on
known sites.
However, it may not be possible to completely some vial
impacts are placed close to
sites.
Chance finds protocols will mitigate impacts at unknown or unregistered sites; however, any effects on these areas would need to be determined at the project level and may not be possible to effectively mitigate.
or
?
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impact on
known sites.
However, it may not be possible to completely some vial
impacts are placed close to
sites.
Chance finds protocols will
mitigate impacts at unknown or unregistered
sites; however, any effects on
these areas would need to be determined at the project level and may not be possible to effectively
mitigate.
or
?
Application of siting
constraints and mitigation measures
should avoid impact on
known sites.
However, it may not be possible to completely some vial
impacts are placed close to
sites.
Chance finds protocols will
mitigate impacts at unknown or unregistered
sites; however, any effects on
these areas would need to be determined at the project level and may not be possible to effectively
mitigate.
Due to location at existing
landfill, effects on intangible
cultural heritage are unlikely.
Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review
Appendix E – Gaps between EBRD PR for ESIA and Kazakhstan EIA requirements
Appendix E: Gaps between EBRD PR for ESIA and Kazakhstan EIA requirements
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
PR 1: Environmental and Social Appraisal and Management
All EBRD‐financed projects undergo environmental and social appraisal
The EIA is obligatory for all sectors of economic and other activities that may directly or indirectly impact the environment and public health. The EIA process is performed on the strength of commitment, integration (magnitude), alternative, adequacy, preservation, compatibility, flexibility, and public participation.
None
Categorization and EIA magnitude The EBRD categorizes proposed projects as “A”, “B”, and “C”. A project is classified as Category A when it could result in potentially significant and diverse adverse future environmental and/or social impacts and issues which, at the time of categorization, cannot readily be identified or assessed and which require a formalized and participatory assessment process carried out by independent third party specialists in accordance with the PRs (Appendix 1 to the EBRD ESP). A proposed project is classified as Category B when the potential adverse environmental and / or social impacts that it may give rise to are
Economic activities subjected to the EIA procedure are categorized as I, II, III, and IV, of which categories I and II cause major impacts on the environment. According to the requirements, there is the list of projects (economic activities) for which the EIA is recommended to be performed in full (for example, oil industry and crude oil refineries, thermal power stations, chemical installations, pipelines for transport of gas, oil or chemicals, etc.) and the list of projects (economic activities) for which the requirements to carry out a comprehensive assessment are imposed by State review authorities on the basis of a preliminary review or by applying
None
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
typically site‐specific, and/or readily identified and addressed through mitigation measures. These impacts could be from past, current or future activities. Due diligence requirements may vary depending on the project and will be agreed with the EBRD on a case‐by‐case basis, in accordance with PR 1. A proposed project is classified as Category C when it is likely to result in minimal or no adverse environmental or social impacts and therefore requires no further environmental and social appraisal beyond categorization. Based on the KazREFF SER, it is anticipated that most funded projects will fall within Categories B or C.
thresholds defined by regulations (agriculture, forestry, mining industry, power industry, wind farms, etc.).
EIA stages The EIA process comprises the following stages: 1) preliminary EIA (stage 1); 2) EIA that is performed for a complete and comprehensive analysis of potential effects of the project or further economic and other activities, substantiation of alternatives, and development of an environmental management plan (programme) (stage 2); 3) “Environmental Protection” section that constitutes part of the design documentation and contains engineering solutions aimed at prevention of adverse
None
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
impacts on the environment (stage 3). The EIA format, completeness of studies, scope of used documents, levels and degree of detail of environmental scientific & design surveys depend on the design stage as well as on magnitude and intensity of impacts caused by projected economic and other activities on human health and environment. EIA is an integral part of pre‐design and design documents.
Preliminary environmental and social assessment (Pre EIA) Through appraisal activities, the client will consider in an integrated manner the potential environmental and social issues and impacts associated with the proposed project. The appraisal process will be based on recent information, including an accurate description and delineation of the client’s business or the project, and social and environmental baseline data at an appropriate level of detail. The appraisal should also identify applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which the project operates that pertain to environmental and social matters, including those laws implementing host country obligations under international law (for example, commitments
Through Pre‐EIA activities, the potential trends of changes in environmental and socioeconomic components as well as impacts on both the society and environment are identified. No need in computations of the pollution level for certain environmental components (air, soils, water, subsoil resources). Pre‐EIA documents are disclosed for public by a project initiator. Pre‐design appraisal documents (business‐plans, feasibility studies) and main pre‐design documents such as “Investment substantiation” and Pre‐EIA documents are
None
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
related to land use planning and protected area management).
submitted to the State Environmental Review (SER). A positive Conclusion issued by the SER in favour of the project initiator, serves as a guide for making decisions to initiate designing of specific facilities and structures in accordance with the most rational option selected in the course of Pre‐EIA development.
Environmental and social appraisal (EIA) mechanism
Environmental and social impacts and issues will be appraised in the context of the project’s area of influence. Environmental and social issues and impacts will also be analysed for the relevant stages of the project cycle. These may include preconstruction, construction, operations, and decommissioning or closure and reinstatement. Where relevant, the appraisal will also consider the role and capacity of third parties, such as local and national governments, contractors and suppliers, to the extent that they may influence the project, recognizing that the client’s ability to address these risks and impacts will depend on its control and influence over the third party actions. The appraisal will also consider potential trans‐boundary and global issues, such as impacts from effluents and emissions, increased use or contamination of international waterways, greenhouse gas emissions, climate change mitigation and adaptation issues, and impacts on endangered species and habitats.
The EIA process comprises an assessment of impacts on:
atmospheric air water resources; subsoil resources; industrial and domestic waste; physical impacts; lands and soils; flora; fauna; socioeconomic environment; environmental risks from planned
activities in the region A project initiator discloses EIA documents for the public.
None
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
PR 2: Labour and Working Conditions
At a minimum, the client’s human resources policies, procedures and standards shall be designed to: establish and maintain a sound worker‐management relationship; promote the fair treatment, non‐discrimination and equal opportunity of workers; promote compliance with any collective agreements to which the client is a party, national labour and employment laws, and the fundamental principles and key regulatory standards embodied in the ILO conventions that are central to this relationship; protect and promote the health of workers, especially by promoting safe and healthy working conditions.
Labor relationship in the Republic of Kazakhstan is regulated by the Labor Code and it does not constitute part of the EIA process. Issues related to labor and working conditions and safety are considered in the “Environmental risk assessment in connection with planned activities in the region” section.
Labor relationship issues are not reflected in typical Kazakh EIA documents. This would be a gap if not addressed in a project‐specific ESMP.
PR 3: Pollution Prevention and Abatement
The client will avoid the release of pollutants or, when avoidance is not feasible, minimize or control their release. This applies to the release of pollutants due to routine, non‐routine or accidental circumstances with the potential for local, regional, or trans‐boundary impacts. In addition, the client should examine and incorporate in its operations energy efficiency measures and measures to conserve water and other resources, consistent with the principles of cleaner production. The client will avoid or minimize the generation of hazardous and non‐hazardous waste materials and reduce its harmfulness as far as practicable.
Measures aimed at prevention and abatement of environmental pollution are specified in EIA documents (“Atmospheric Air”, “Water Resources”, and “Waste” sections). These measures provides for introduction of low‐waste and waste‐free technologies and special measures on i) prevention (abatement) of air emissions; ii) adverse impact mitigation; iii) air quality monitoring; iv) amounts and chemical composition of wastewater discharges; v) substantiation of the introduction of water circulating systems and wastewater reuse systems, recycling of sludge from wastewater treatment facilities; vi)
None
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
groundwater protection against pollution and depletion; and vii) recommendations related to recycling, treatment and disposal of all types of waste and waste recycling/waste disposal technologies.
PR 4: Community Health & Safety and Security
Requirements relating to: infrastructure and equipment safety; hazardous materials safety; community exposure to disease; emergency preparedness and response; and security personnel requirements. These requirements are focused on avoidance or prevention of risks and impacts rather than their minimization and mitigation.
EIA documents comprise a section titled “Assessment of environmental risks for the environment and community health in connection with planned economic activities”. This section contains i) recommendations on prevention of and response to emergencies; ii) consideration of emergency probability; sources and kinds of emergencies and frequency of their occurrence as well as forecasts of their impacts on the environment and community.
None
PR 5: Land Acquisition, Involuntary Resettlement and Economic Displacement
The following requirements are considered in the course of project design: carrying out of consultations; grievance mechanism; resettlement planning and implementation; Resettlement Action Plan; livelihood restoration framework; compensation and benefits for displaced persons; displacement; physical displacement; economic displacement; and loss of public amenities.
Issues related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement are regulated by the Land Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. But the Pre‐EIA documents to be submitted to the SER for reviewing should contain a copy of document for the right of land use in the subject territory.
Kazakhstan EIA regulations do not contain requirements related to land acquisition, involuntary resettlement and economic displacement.
PR 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Resource Management
Through the environmental and social appraisal process, the client will identify and characterize the potential impacts on biodiversity likely to be caused by the project. The extent of due diligence should be sufficient to fully characterize the risks
The EIA process also includes an assessment of impacts on vegetation in the project influence area (the presence of medicinal herbs; rare, endemic and Red Data Book‐listed plat species), green space
None
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
and impacts, consistent with a precautionary approach and reflecting the concerns of relevant stakeholders. The client will seek to avoid adverse impacts on biodiversity.
condition; forecasted changes of the vegetation cover in the project implementation area and impacts of these changes on life and health of local communities; recommendations for conservation of vegetation communities, improvement of their condition, flora conservation and revegetation; recommendation for vegetation monitoring, etc. Furthermore, the EIA documents contain a baseline assessment of aquatic and terrestrial fauna (the presence of rare, endangered and Red Data Book‐listed fauna species); measure to conserve and reproduce the integrity of natural communities and species diversity of aquatic and terrestrial fauna; food potential improvement; a wildlife monitoring programme. In addition, the presence of natural territories and landmarks under special protection in the territory of potential construction operations is considered.
PR 7: Indigenous Peoples
In projects where Indigenous Peoples are likely to be affected, the client is required to carry out an assessment of impacts on Indigenous Peoples. Depending upon the outcome of this, the client is expected to first avoid adverse effects and where this is not feasible, to prepare and Indigenous
The Kazakhstan legislation does not specify requirements related to Indigenous Peoples
The Kazakhstan EIA procedure does not consider issues related to Indigenous People. However, this is not typically an issue in
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
Peoples’ Development Plan so as to minimize and/or mitigate any potential adverse impacts. The client is also expected to implement a specific grievance mechanism and determine appropriate modalities for compensation and benefit‐sharing.
Kazakhstan, where there is no indigenous population.
PR 8: Cultural Heritage
At an early stage of the environmental and social appraisal, the client should identify if any cultural heritage is likely to be adversely affected by the project, and assess the likelihood of any chance finds. The client will ensure that provisions for managing chance finds, defined as physical cultural heritage encountered unexpectedly during project implementation, are in place. Such provisions shall include notification of relevant competent bodies of found objects or sites; alerting project personnel to the possibility of chance finds being discovered; and fencing‐off the area of finds to avoid any further disturbance or destruction.
EIA documents contain a section devoted to territories, landmarks and sites under special protection. Cultural heritage is regulated by the RK Law “On Protection and Use of Historical and Cultural Heritage Sites and Objects” dated July 2, 1992. Companies, institutions, organizations, educational institutions, public organizations and individuals will support an authorized relevant body in implementation of measures aimed at protection, preservation and use of historical and cultural heritage sites.
None
PR 9: Financial Intermediaries (FI)
Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
PR 10: Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement
“Information Disclosure and Stakeholder Engagement” specifies requirements relating to stakeholder identification, development of a Stakeholder Engagement Plan, information disclosure, meaningful consultations, and grievance mechanism.
Public opinion is given proper weight in the process of EIA development. Public opinion consideration format depends on the significance of planned economic activities and the extent of project influence on the environment and community health; much
Kazakhstan requirements do not specify a detailed procedure for stakeholders identification and engagement or the grievance mechanism
EBRD Performance Requirement/Issue
Issue Related Kazakhstan OVOS Requirement
Gap
depends on stakeholders. The procedure and dates of public consultations is regulated by environmental supervisory authorities. Public opinion is mainly considered through public consultations. The results of public consultations are recorded in the form of a report where all key issues and disagreements between stakeholders and a client are recorded. Stakeholders’ comments and proposals are considered in design documents. Written proposals and comments from stakeholders (as an independent form of public opinion consideration) are collected for individual less significant projects of economic activities. At subsequent stages of project design, the procedure of public opinion consideration can be carried out through collection of written proposals and comments in respect of EIA findings for a certain industrial operation.
procedure.
Kazakhstan Renewable Energy Financing Facility (KazREFF) - Strategic Environmental Review
Appendix F – Stakeholder Engagement Programme Timeframe
Appendix F: Stakeholder Engagement Programme Timeframe Error! Reference source not found. below describes the key elements of the KazREFF SER stakeholder engagement and consultation programme. Stakeholder consultation has been on-going throughout the main SER. There will be additional scoping meetings and capacity-building training to allow more people to contribute and learn how this SER can be a valuable environmental and social planning tool.
Events/Activities Tasks Information for disclosure
Timeframe
1. Stage 1 – Project Introduction and Stakeholder Identification (April through July 2013)
1.1.Individual consultations with identified key stakeholders
Gathering baseline information; presenting SER process
Initial KazREFF SER flyer (in English and Russian)
April-May 2013
2. Stage 2 – Scoping and Capacity Building (July 2013 through March 2014)
2.1 Posting SEP on the KazREFF website
Presenting the document to public for discussion and comments
SEP (in English and Russian)
June 2013
2.2. Posting draft SER Scoping Report on the KazREFF website
Presenting the document to public for discussion and comments
Draft SER Scoping Report (in English and Russian)
June 2013
2.3 SER Scoping Meetings in Astana and Almaty
Gathering feedback on SER Scoping Report from the stakeholders and identification of capacity building needs
Presentation of key topics from the SER Scoping Report (in Russian)
16 and 18 July 2013
2.4. On-going Phone/email/mail correspondence with key stakeholders
Gathering feedback on SER Scoping Report from the stakeholders
Draft SER Scoping Report (in English and Russian)
June 2013 – February 2014
2.5. Scoping and capacity building workshops as needed
Building dialogue capacity for KazREFF and its applicants and local experts; introduction of SER approach
Draft SER Scoping Report; hand-out materials (in Russian)
July 2013 –March 2014
3. Stage 3 – Public Consultation and Implementation (September 2014 through March 2015)
3.1 Notify stakeholders of availability of Draft SER for 120-day public consultation
Email communication with all identified stakeholders
Availability of SER for public consultation.
Revised KazREFF SER Leaflet (from Stage 1)
September 2014
Events/Activities Tasks Information for
disclosure Timeframe
3.2. Posting Draft SER Report on the KazREFF website
Presenting the document to public for discussion and comments
Draft SER Report (in English and Russian)
September 2014
3.3. Posting Draft SER Report Non-Technical Summary on the KazREFF website
Presenting the document to public for discussion and comments
Non-Technical Summary (in English, Russian, and Kazakh)
September 2014
3.4 SER workshops in Astana, Almaty, and regional centres as necessary
Presentation of key conclusions of the SER (in Russian)
Draft SER Report in English and Russian
SER Non-Technical Summary in English, Russian, and Kazakh
September 2014
3.4.1 Announcement of SER workshops in Astana, Almaty, and regional centres as necessary
Publish meeting, date, and venue announcement in regional newspaper.
SER report meeting announcement
14 days prior to each meeting
3.4.2 Establish SER report repositories in Astana, Almaty, and regional centres as necessary
Place copies of the SER Report in libraries for public review
Draft SER Report in English and Russian
SER Non-Technical Summary in English, Russian, and Kazakh
14 days prior to each meeting
3.5. Implementation round tables/by-invitation workshops in the target regions if level of interest indicates the need for it
Provide stakeholders with key guidance for using the SER, both within EBRD’s KazREFF programme and for other RES developments projects outside of KazREFF.
Renewable Project Environmental Review Report
January 2015.
Specific dates for meetings will be announced through SER and KazREFF public websites, and regional newspapers
3.6. Collecting feedback and comments on Draft SER report
Discussion of the SER results
Draft SER documents On-going process throughout the 120 day consultation period September 2014 through January 2015
3.7. Closing of public comment period
Obtain and process public feedback
Draft SER documents At the end of the 120 day consultation period (January 2015)
Events/Activities Tasks Information for
disclosure Timeframe
3.8. Preparation of Report on Public Consultation
Addressing all comments and feedback
Preparing a summary of the KazREFF SER stakeholder engagement consultation process
Final SER Report in English and Russian
Report on Public Consultation
March 2015