l3 erp evolution
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)(ERP)
What is Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)?
What is Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)?
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software places its focus on integrating an organizations departments (i.e., finance, HR, warehousing, etc.) and functions onto a single integrated computer system that aims to serve all those different departmental needs.
Enterprise Resource Planning
Enterprise Resource Planning
Enterprise transactional backbone to ensure data Enterprise transactional backbone to ensure data integrity and best business processesintegrity and best business processes
Using a single database, streamlines the flow of Using a single database, streamlines the flow of information through a businessinformation through a business
Four main (M) functions: Four main (M) functions:
– Money (financial)Money (financial)
– Man (human resources)Man (human resources)
– Manufacturing (production and logistics)Manufacturing (production and logistics)
– Marketing (sales and distribution)Marketing (sales and distribution)
Primary business systems installed in tens of thousands of Primary business systems installed in tens of thousands of manufacturing companies manufacturing companies
The concept of ERP has been around since 1960’sThe concept of ERP has been around since 1960’s MRPMRP
– Introduced in the 1970’s Introduced in the 1970’s
– Computerized approach to planning and obtaining the Computerized approach to planning and obtaining the required materials for manufacturing / productionrequired materials for manufacturing / production
– Uses mainframes as the main source for input and Uses mainframes as the main source for input and processing.processing.
In the 1980’s In the 1980’s MRPMRP expanded to expanded to
– plant and personnel planning and distribution planning which plant and personnel planning and distribution planning which in turn became in turn became MRP-IIMRP-II
MRP & MRP II
Manufacturing Planning and Control (MPC) System
Manufacturing Planning and Control (MPC) System
MRP II or MPC systemMRP II or MPC system– DefinitionDefinition
– The MPC system provides information to efficiently manage the The MPC system provides information to efficiently manage the flow of materials, effectively utilise resources, coordinate flow of materials, effectively utilise resources, coordinate internal activities with those of suppliers and communicate with internal activities with those of suppliers and communicate with customers about market requirementscustomers about market requirements
– Support tasksSupport tasks– capacity requirements planningcapacity requirements planning– material requirements planningmaterial requirements planning– rough-cut capacity requirements planningrough-cut capacity requirements planning– inventory planning and controlinventory planning and control– production schedulingproduction scheduling– production activity controlproduction activity control
MRP IIMRP II
– Used Mainframes, but in conjunction with LAN Used Mainframes, but in conjunction with LAN (Local Area Networks) to input and access (Local Area Networks) to input and access information information
MRP II evolvesMRP II evolves
– COMMS, or Customer Oriented Manufacturing COMMS, or Customer Oriented Manufacturing Management SystemManagement System
– COMS, or Customer Oriented Management COMS, or Customer Oriented Management SystemSystem
– ERP, or Enterprise Resource Planning (Gartner ERP, or Enterprise Resource Planning (Gartner 1990) 1990)
Reasons which led to Standard Application Software (SAS) vs in-house Reasons which led to Standard Application Software (SAS) vs in-house developed Information System developed Information System
– Cost of permanent employees, programmers, & technical support Cost of permanent employees, programmers, & technical support to create and maintain the home-grown applicationsto create and maintain the home-grown applications
– IT department’s poor responsiveness to changes in business IT department’s poor responsiveness to changes in business tactics, mergers/acquisitions, and economic cycle.tactics, mergers/acquisitions, and economic cycle.
Idea behind SAS Several organizations can use the same softwareIdea behind SAS Several organizations can use the same software– With several users the costs of development, support and With several users the costs of development, support and
maintenance are sharedmaintenance are shared– Each client does not have to “reinvent the wheel”Each client does not have to “reinvent the wheel”
ERP is also a SAS where several systems are integrated.ERP is also a SAS where several systems are integrated.
Standard Application Software
Enterprise System Integration Trend
Enterprise System Integration Trend
ACC
BOM PUR
INV SLS
SLS
FIN SFC
CAD/CAM
MRP MRPⅡ
EISCIM
ERPEDI
SCM
Time
ExtranetECGL
Systemintegration
Island system
Partiallyintegrated
system
Individualenterpriseintegration
Supply chainintegration
Inter-Enterprise Integration vs. Intra-Enterprise Integration
Inter-Enterprise Integration vs. Intra-Enterprise Integration
Partnershipcontrol system
Bank
Retailers
In-houseinventory
control
PlantX
PlantA
PlantB
In-housemanufacturing
logisticscontrol
inter-enterpriseinteractions
MRPII
Enterprise 1 Enterprise 2
Inter-enterpriseintegration level
Intra-enterpriseintegration level
Local sitecontrol systems
Enterprise Integration: Definition
Enterprise Integration: Definition
Enterprise integration is concerned Enterprise integration is concerned with facilitating information, control, and with facilitating information, control, and material flows across organizational material flows across organizational boundaries by connecting all the boundaries by connecting all the necessary functions and heterogeneous necessary functions and heterogeneous functional entities in order to improve functional entities in order to improve communication, cooperation, and communication, cooperation, and coordination within this enterprise so that coordination within this enterprise so that the enterprise behaves as an integrated the enterprise behaves as an integrated whole, therefore enhancing its overall whole, therefore enhancing its overall productivity, flexibility, and capacity for productivity, flexibility, and capacity for management of change.management of change.
EASEAS
ERPERP
MRPMRP
MRP IIMRP II
Extended Extended ERPERP
ERP Declared ERP Declared “Dead”“Dead”
Industry XIndustry X
Industry Industry Class AClass A
Industry Industry Segment Segment
ZZ
Industry Industry Sector QSector Q
Technology Technology InfrastructureInfrastructure
Functionality Functionality WidensWidens
Functionality Functionality DeepensDeepens
Increasing External ConnectivityIncreasing External Connectivity
ERP IIERP II
Getting to ERP IIGetting to ERP II
ERP IIERP II is an application and deployment is an application and deployment strategy that expands out from ERP strategy that expands out from ERP functions to achieve integration of an:functions to achieve integration of an:
enterprise’s key domain-specific,enterprise’s key domain-specific, internal and external collaborative, internal and external collaborative, operational and financial processes. operational and financial processes.
(Gartner, 2002)(Gartner, 2002)
ERP II
WhatWhat an application and an application and deployment strategydeployment strategy
for collaborative,for collaborative,operational and operational and
financial processesfinancial processes
WhyWhy
to provide deep, vertical-to provide deep, vertical-specific functionality coupledspecific functionality coupled
with external connectivitywith external connectivity
WhereWhere
within the enterprise,within the enterprise,and between the enterpriseand between the enterprise
and key external and key external partners and marketspartners and markets
HowHow
migration from existing ERPmigration from existing ERPvendors and integration with vendors and integration with
other enterprise-centric other enterprise-centric business applicationsbusiness applications
WhenWhenin conjunctionin conjunctionwith collaborationwith collaboration
ERP II DefinedERP II Defined
WhoWhotraditional ERP vendorstraditional ERP vendors
with extensionswith extensions(integrated or BOB)(integrated or BOB)
How ERP II Evolves From ERPHow ERP II Evolves From ERP
ERPERP ERP IIERP IIValue chain participation/Value chain participation/c-commerce enablementc-commerce enablementEnterprise optimizationEnterprise optimization RoleRole
All sectors/segmentsAll sectors/segmentsManufacturing Manufacturing and distributionand distribution DomainDomain
Cross-industry, industry Cross-industry, industry sector and specific sector and specific industry processesindustry processes
Manufacturing, sales Manufacturing, sales and distribution, and and distribution, and finance processesfinance processes
FunctionFunction
Externally connectedExternally connectedInternal, hiddenInternal, hidden ProcessProcess
Web-based, open, Web-based, open, componentizedcomponentized
Web-aware, Web-aware, closed, monolithicclosed, monolithic ArchitectureArchitecture
Internally and externally Internally and externally published and subscribedpublished and subscribedInternally and externally Internally and externally published and subscribedpublished and subscribed
Internally generated Internally generated and consumedand consumedInternally generated Internally generated and consumedand consumed DataData
Functionality Evolution —The Cycle of Assimilation
Functionality Evolution —The Cycle of Assimilation
MRPMRP II FinancialsFinancials
CPCCPC
IPSIPS
PrivatePrivateMarketplaceMarketplace CRMCRM
PRMPRM
SCPSCP PurchasingPurchasing
HRHR
SalesSales DistributionDistribution
SCESCE
E-ProcurementE-Procurement
ERPERPPackagePackage
ComponentsComponents
ERP IIERP IIPackagePackage
ComponentsComponents
MRPMRP GLGL
ProductionProduction
Process Integration Blurs the Application Lines
Process Integration Blurs the Application Lines
CRMCRM
ERPERP
SCMSCM
Prospect to Cash ProcessProspect to Cash Process
1. Log Activity1. Log Activity1. Log Activity1. Log Activity
2. Log Opportunity2. Log Opportunity2. Log Opportunity2. Log Opportunity
3. Check for contract3. Check for contract3. Check for contract3. Check for contract
4. Check Inventory4. Check Inventory4. Check Inventory4. Check Inventory
5. Check ATP/CTP5. Check ATP/CTP5. Check ATP/CTP5. Check ATP/CTP
7. Quote Customer7. Quote Customer7. Quote Customer7. Quote Customer
8. Create Quote8. Create Quote8. Create Quote8. Create Quote 9. Generate Order9. Generate Order9. Generate Order9. Generate Order
12. Plan and 12. Plan and ProduceProduce12. Plan and 12. Plan and ProduceProduce
13. Send ASN13. Send ASN13. Send ASN13. Send ASN
14. Ship14. Ship14. Ship14. Ship
15. Invoice15. Invoice15. Invoice15. Invoice
16. Apply Payment16. Apply Payment16. Apply Payment16. Apply Payment
6. Determine Price6. Determine Price6. Determine Price6. Determine Price
EAIEAIEAIEAI
EAIEAIEAIEAI
10. Check Credit10. Check Credit10. Check Credit10. Check Credit
11. Confirm Order11. Confirm Order11. Confirm Order11. Confirm Order
Prospect to Cash ProcessProspect to Cash Process
Process Integration Blurs the Application Lines
Process Integration Blurs the Application Lines
CRMCRM
ERPERP
SCMSCM
1. Log Activity1. Log Activity1. Log Activity1. Log Activity
2. Log Opportunity2. Log Opportunity2. Log Opportunity2. Log Opportunity
3. Check for contract3. Check for contract3. Check for contract3. Check for contract
4. Check Inventory4. Check Inventory4. Check Inventory4. Check Inventory
5. Check ATP/CTP5. Check ATP/CTP5. Check ATP/CTP5. Check ATP/CTP
7. Quote Customer7. Quote Customer7. Quote Customer7. Quote Customer
8. Create Quote8. Create Quote8. Create Quote8. Create Quote 9. Generate Order9. Generate Order9. Generate Order9. Generate Order
12. Plan and 12. Plan and ProduceProduce12. Plan and 12. Plan and ProduceProduce
13. Send ASN13. Send ASN13. Send ASN13. Send ASN
14. Ship14. Ship14. Ship14. Ship
15. Invoice15. Invoice15. Invoice15. Invoice
16. Apply Payment16. Apply Payment16. Apply Payment16. Apply Payment
6. Determine Price6. Determine Price6. Determine Price6. Determine Price
10. Check Credit10. Check Credit10. Check Credit10. Check Credit
11. Confirm Order11. Confirm Order11. Confirm Order11. Confirm Order
ERP IIERP IIPackagePackage
Internal and External Processes Enablement
Internal and External Processes Enablement
Raw MaterialsRaw MaterialsSupplierSupplier CustomeCustome
rr
LogisticsLogisticsProvidersProviders
SubcontractorSubcontractor
RetailerRetailerComponentComponent
SupplierSupplier
Collaborative Private or
Public E-Market
Collaborative Private or
Public E-Market
ERP IIERP II
DCDC
ManufacturingManufacturing
LogisticsLogistics
SalesSalesMarketingMarketing
InternalInternal1:11:11:M, M:11:M, M:1
MfgMfg.
ERP/ERP II Hype CycleERP/ERP II Hype Cycle
YE2001YE2001
19901990 Client/ServerClient/Server
19981998 Year 2000 FeverYear 2000 Fever
20042004
ERP II: A C-Commerce
Enabler
Trough ofTrough ofDisillusionmentDisillusionment
Slope ofSlope ofEnlightenmentEnlightenment
Plateau ofPlateau ofProductivityProductivity
TechnologyTechnologyTriggerTrigger
Peak ofPeak ofInflatedInflated
ExpectationsExpectations
VisibilityVisibility
TimeTime
The Investment Balancing Act The Investment Balancing Act
• Consider ERP/ERP II strategies and deployments to be part of the e-business infrastructure•They provide the critical transaction systems that manage and control fulfillment.
•Goals like• Gaining position within a digital market• Integrating seamlessly with key partners and customers• Providing quality data to suppliers
Are critical goals that will be achieved only through sufficient investment in ERP and ERP II.
• Without adequate investment in these areas, enterprises will languish as vertically integrated islands rather than thriving within the c-commerce ecosystem.
*Source: Gartner Group
RecommendationsRecommendations
Don’t count on a single vendor to meet all of your Don’t count on a single vendor to meet all of your domain and collaborative requirements.domain and collaborative requirements.
Make the ERP II elements of “integration” and Make the ERP II elements of “integration” and “domain specificity” key components of your strategy.“domain specificity” key components of your strategy.
Strive for seamless process enablement rather than Strive for seamless process enablement rather than general point application solutions.general point application solutions.
Although there will be some degree of best-of-breed, Although there will be some degree of best-of-breed, evaluate TCO to determine how much.evaluate TCO to determine how much.
Evaluate past successes/failures, compare to other Evaluate past successes/failures, compare to other user experiences and don’t make the same user experiences and don’t make the same mistakes twice.mistakes twice.
FoxMeyer DrugFoxMeyer Drug
Large drug distributor, wanted to implement ERP
Large drug distributor, wanted to implement ERP
FoxMeyer CorpFoxMeyer Corp
Holding company in health care servicesHolding company in health care services wholesale distribution of drugs & beauty aidswholesale distribution of drugs & beauty aids
served drug stores, chains, hospitals, care facilitiesserved drug stores, chains, hospitals, care facilities US: 23 distribution centersUS: 23 distribution centers Sought market niches, such as home health careSought market niches, such as home health care
FoxMeyerFoxMeyer
Due to aging population & growth in health care, expected Due to aging population & growth in health care, expected high growthhigh growth
Market had extreme price competition, threatening marginsMarket had extreme price competition, threatening margins
Long-term strategies: Long-term strategies: – efficiently manage inventoryefficiently manage inventory
– lower operating expenseslower operating expenses
– strengthen sales & marketingstrengthen sales & marketing
– expand servicesexpand services
Prior FoxMeyer ISPrior FoxMeyer IS
3 data processing centers, linked3 data processing centers, linked included electronic order entry, invoice included electronic order entry, invoice
preparation, inventory trackingpreparation, inventory tracking 1992 began migration of core systems1992 began migration of core systems Benefits not realized until system fully integratedBenefits not realized until system fully integrated
FoxMeyer ProcessFoxMeyer Process
Customer fills out electronic orderCustomer fills out electronic order Order sent to 1 of the 3 Order sent to 1 of the 3 data processing centersdata processing centers Orders sent to the appropriate Orders sent to the appropriate distribution centerdistribution center (within 24 (within 24
hours)hours) Orders filled Orders filled manuallymanually and packaged and packaged Had just completed Had just completed national distribution centernational distribution center with multiple with multiple
carousels & automated pickingcarousels & automated picking Could track inventory to Could track inventory to secondary locationssecondary locations
New SystemNew System
Needed new distribution processes & IS to Needed new distribution processes & IS to capitalize on growthcapitalize on growth
Wanted to be able to undercut competitorsWanted to be able to undercut competitors Replacing aging IS keyReplacing aging IS key
PROJECTPROJECT: : 1994 - hoped to save $40 million annually 1994 - hoped to save $40 million annually (estimated cost $65 million)(estimated cost $65 million)
– complete complete ERPERP installation & installation & warehouse warehouse automation systemautomation system (another $18 million) (another $18 million)
FoxMeyer ProjectFoxMeyer Project
Select ERPSelect ERP
– hundreds of thousands of transactionshundreds of thousands of transactions
– meet DEA & FDA regulationsmeet DEA & FDA regulations
– benchmarked & tested for monthsbenchmarked & tested for months
– picked SAP R/3picked SAP R/3
– hired hired Andersen ConsultingAndersen Consulting to integrate to integrate
– hired hired Pinnacle AutomationPinnacle Automation for for warehouse warehouse automation systemautomation system
OperationsOperations
FoxMeyer expected the new systems to improve FoxMeyer expected the new systems to improve operational efficiencyoperational efficiency
Signed several giant contractsSigned several giant contracts
– counted on savings, counted on savings, underbid competitorsunderbid competitors Counted on being up and running in 18 monthsCounted on being up and running in 18 months
ProblemsProblems
SAP & warehouse automation system integrationSAP & warehouse automation system integration
– two sources, two installers - coordination two sources, two installers - coordination problemsproblems
New contracts forced change in system requirements after New contracts forced change in system requirements after testing & development underwaytesting & development underway
Late, Over budgetLate, Over budget
– SAP successfully implementedSAP successfully implemented
OutcomesOutcomes
Lost key customer - 15% of salesLost key customer - 15% of sales To recoup, signed new customer, expected $40 million benefit To recoup, signed new customer, expected $40 million benefit
from ERP immediately - pushed ERP project deadline ahead 90 from ERP immediately - pushed ERP project deadline ahead 90 days, no time to reengineerdays, no time to reengineer
Warehouse system consistently failedWarehouse system consistently failed– late orders, incorrect shipment, lost shipmentslate orders, incorrect shipment, lost shipments– losses of over $15 millionlosses of over $15 million
August 1996 filed for Chapter 11August 1996 filed for Chapter 11– McKesson boughtMcKesson bought
Challenges of ERP: in the beginningChallenges of ERP: in the beginning
Is ERP even a good fit?Is ERP even a good fit? Understanding the business goals is essentialUnderstanding the business goals is essential ERP: the marriage of business goals and IT strategyERP: the marriage of business goals and IT strategy Managers must ask:Managers must ask:
– What business are we in? Where do we want to go?What business are we in? Where do we want to go?
– What are the key issues facing us today?What are the key issues facing us today?
– What will be the key issues facing us tomorrow?What will be the key issues facing us tomorrow?
Challenges of ERP: FoxMeyer
Challenges of ERP: FoxMeyer
A bad case of ERP implementationA bad case of ERP implementation $5 billion pharmaceutical wholesaler filed for $5 billion pharmaceutical wholesaler filed for
bankruptcy in 1996bankruptcy in 1996 SAP and Andersen Consulting sued in 1998SAP and Andersen Consulting sued in 1998 Failure to find the right fit between ERP apps and Failure to find the right fit between ERP apps and
the needs of the businessthe needs of the business
The FoxMeyer Drug’s Bankruptcy :Was it a Failure of ERP?
The FoxMeyer Drug’s Bankruptcy :Was it a Failure of ERP?
What were the risks associated with What were the risks associated with ERP implementation project at ERP implementation project at FoxMeyer ?FoxMeyer ?
In case of FoxMeyer What factors In case of FoxMeyer What factors contributed to the escalation of the contributed to the escalation of the project despite negative information ?project despite negative information ?
Based on FoxMeyer’s experience what Based on FoxMeyer’s experience what steps any organization should take to steps any organization should take to avoid ERP implementation failure ?avoid ERP implementation failure ?