longitudinal study of nc ehdi program a joint study by the office of education services of the nc...
TRANSCRIPT
Longitudinal Study of NC EHDI
ProgramA joint study by the Office of Education Services of the NC Dept. of Health and
Human ServicesAnd
BEGINNINGS For Parents of Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, Inc.
Presented by Joni Alberg, Ph.D. and Christene Tashjian, MPA
BEGINNINGS--Raleigh, NC
Faculty Disclosure Information
In the past 12 months, we have not had a significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s), the product(s) or provider(s) of the service(s) that will be discussed in our presentation.
This presentation will not include discussion of pharmaceuticals or devices that have not been approved by the FDA, nor will we discuss any unapproved or “off – label” uses of pharmaceuticals or devices.
Study Design TeamJoni Alberg, Ph.D.--Executive Director—BEGINNINGS
Cyndie Bennett, MA—Superintendent—Office of Education Services, NC Dept. of Health & Human Services
Jack Roush, Ph.D., CCC/A, Chair--Director--Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, UNC-CH School of Medicine
Member, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing
Christene Tashjian, MPA—Assistant Executive Director of Research & Development, BEGINNINGS
Kathryn Wilson, MA, CCC-SLP, Cert-AVT—Director—Resource Support Program, Office of Education Services, NC
Dept. of Health & Human Services
Goals of the NC EHDI Program
All infants are screened for hearing loss prior to discharge from birthing/neonatal facilities, or within one month of birth.
All infants referred from the screening process complete diagnostic audiological evaluation by three months of age.
All infants with diagnosed hearing loss receive appropriate interventions by six months of age, including amplification selection (if appropriate) and early intervention.
Early Intervention Program for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard
of HearingProvide comprehensive, developmental and educational services to children who are deaf, hard of hearing, or deaf/blind, ages birth to 3, and their families with a concentration on language and communication skill development.
Purpose of the Study
Examine efforts to achieve 1-3-6 goals for newborn hearing screening/diagnosis/intervention.
Examine language outcomes of children transitioning from EI to Preschool.
Follow the language development progress of children who have exited EI.
Questions We Set Out to Answer
1. Are we meeting our goals for newborn screening and diagnosis?
2. Are we achieving desired goals for language and communication development in children enrolled in EI?
3. Do children continue to make gains in preschool so that they are “on par” with hearing peers when they enter Kindergarten?
Study Design
•Longitudinal•Statewide in scope•Representative•Pilot Phase
Study Subjects
• BEGINNINGS’ database• Received EI services• Born since newborn screening
implemented• Turning three years old during Pilot
Phase• Parents agree to participate
As of 12/31/03
CHEROKEE MACON
GRAHAM
HAY-WOOD
RUTHER-FORD
BUN-COMBE
YAN-CEYMADISON
MITCHELL
CLEVELAND
LINCOLN
CATAWBABURKE
MECKLEN-
BURG
UNION
CABARRUS
ROWAN
IREDELL
STANLY
DAVID-SON
MONT-GOMERY
RANDOLPH
MOORE
ANSONRICH-MOND
HOKE
CHATHAM
HARNETT
CUMBER-LAND
ROBESON BLADEN
SAMPSON
COLUMBUS
BRUNSWICK
NEWHANOVER
PENDER
ORA
NGE
DURH
AM
PERSON
GRAN
VILL
E
VANC
E
FRANKLIN
WAKE
NASH
JOHNSTON
WAYNE
DUPLIN
GREENE
LENOIR
PITT
JONES
ONSLOW CARTERET
CRAVEN
HYDE
WASH-INGTON
BERTIE
MARTIN
CURRITUCK
NORTH-AMPTON
HALIFAX
EDGE-COMBE
ROCKING-HAM
STOKESSURRY
FORSYTH GUILFORD
DAVIE
ASHE
WATAUGA
ALLE-GHANY
CALDWELL ALEX-ANDER
McDOWELL WILSON
AVERY
CASWELL WARREN
YADKIN
TYRELL DARE
SWAIN JACKSON
POLK
SCOT-LAND
PAMLICO
BEAUFORT
CAMDENGATESHERT-FORD
COUNTIES1 PASQUOTANK2 PERQUIMANS
1CHOW
AN
2
CLAY T
RAN-
SYLVANIA HENDER-
SON
ALAM
ANCE
GASTONLEE
WILKES
BEGINNINGS For Parents of Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, Inc.
Location of Longitudinal Study ChildrenAs of December 2005
As of 12/31/05
Methodology
• Design Team developed data collection forms
• BEGINNINGS created parent release forms, FAQs, abstract; translated into Spanish
• BEGINNINGS’ staff, EI staff, CHAC were trained to use the forms
Data Collection
BEGINNINGS’ staff confirm current parental info with EI staff, get family update (if needed)
BEGINNINGS staff call parents, send materials; 3 attempts made
Parents sign ROI, PPF
EI staff complete their portion of DCF
CHACs provide screening/hearing info
Children assigned unique ID number, no names
Data Elements
Family/Child
Hearing EI
Hearing status of parents & siblings
NBS/re-screen tool(s), results
Dates service began/ended
Primary language in home
Etiology of loss Location/frequency of serv.; length of session
Parent(s) job, highest education level
Initial & transition hearing thresholds
Description of services
Other challenges – child
Initial & transition HL type
Level of parental participation in sessions
Avg. # hr/day child uses HI (or signs) at home
Age at 1st HA fitting Other therapies child receives
Communication choice(s)
HA type/CI/FM Private SL/AVT
EI File Review
EI transition language assessment scores
Rosetti, DOCs, PLS-4
Subset of 30-40 children to be given PLS-4 by EI SLPs
PLS - 4
To be administered to all subjects at ages 4, 5, 6
Test results compared with previous year(s) to assess progress
Share results with parents & preschool
Gender
27 female
18 male
Other Challenges
20 None
3 Unknown
8 One Challenge
3 Two Challenges
10 Three or More Challenges
Preliminary Findings 45 subjects Located in 29/100 counties
Hearing Status of Parents
42 Hearing
3 Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Language in Home
39 English
5 Spanish
1 ASL
Siblings
7 None
6 Yes, with hearing loss
31 Yes, with no hearing loss
(1 Incomplete data)
Other Therapies
23 None
24 One or more
9 One only
10 Two therapies
11 Three therapies
12 Four therapies
1 Six therapies
1 Seven therapies
Screening
Tools Location Results
AABR 18 NICU 11 Refer-both 21
OAE 4 WBN 17 Pass-both 3
2 – Step 4 Other/Unknown 3 Refer-one 5
Unknown 5 Direct Refer 2
Rescreen
Tools Location Results
AABR 7 Hospital 12
Refer 19
OAE 3 Priv. Aud. 3 Pass 2
2 – Step 3 Health Dept. 1 Direct Refer 1
Unknown 2 Other 6
Diagnostic Tools
ABR 23
OAE 15
Tympanogram 10
VRA 7
ASSR 2
Acoustic Reflex 1
Play Audiometry 2
Unknown 2
Type of Hearing LossAt Diagnosis
Bilateral 27
Unilateral 3
Unknown 3
Right Ear
Sensorineural20
Conductive 3
AN/AD 4
None 1
Unknown 5
Left Ear
Sensorineural21
Conductive 3
AN/AD 4
None 0
Unknown 5
Type of Hearing LossAt Transition
Bilateral 23
Unilateral 2
Unknown 8
Right Ear
Sensorineural16
Conductive 4
Mixed 1
AN/AD 3
Unknown 9
Left Ear
Sensorineural17
Conductive 3
Mixed 1
AN/AD 3
Unknown 9
Age at DiagnosisN = 32
Range: .5 to 31 months
Median Age: 3 months
Mean Age: 7.4 months
17 children diagnosed by 3 months
(53%)
Age at EI Initiation(N=45)
Range: 2 to 34 months
Median: 11 months
Mean: 12.6 months
14 children (31%) were enrolled in EI by 6 months
Hearing InstrumentsN = 42
Hearing Aid Recommended? 39 yes 3 No
Age at HA Fitting:
Range: 1 to 35 months
Median: 12 months
Mean: 14 months
Type of Hearing Instrument
Air Conduction HA 37Bone Conduction HA 1Bone/Air HA 1None 3
Average Daily Home Use of Hearing Instrument (36 children):
Range: 0 to 16 hours Median: 10 hoursMean: 9 hours
Average Daily Use of Sign in Home (4 children) :
Range: 1 to 24 hoursMedian: 7.5 hoursMean: 10 hours
Personal FM System12
Cochlear Implant 11
Communication Choice
1st Choice 2nd Choice
Auditory Oral 26 3
Auditory Verbal 10 3
Cued Speech 0 1
Total Communication 6 2
ASL 2 1
Other Sign 1 1
Language Assessments at Transition
DOCS: Overall (n=16)
DOCS: Language (n=17)
DOCS: Cognition (n=17)
SS: Range 64 – 103 Mean 88
SS: Range 5 – 107 Mean 81
SS: Range 6 – 103 Mean 80
PLS 4: Total Language
(n = 9)
SS: Range 63 – 92 Mean 79
What We Have Learned So Far…
The Pilot Phase of the Study has been critical.
Not all EI screening and diagnostic data are in one place, requiring time-consuming follow-up.
53% of our babies have been diagnosed by 3 months of age!
Collaboration among agencies responsible for screening, diagnosis, intervention and transition is essential to collecting complete data.
Challenges
Conducting a study of this scope with no additional funding.
The number of people involved in data collection.
Management of large amounts of data.
Conducting research with “non-researchers.”
“Scope Creep” – the scope of work keeps expanding.
Numerous sources from which data must be collected.
Next Steps…
Continue Pilot Study until we have 100 children.
Seek additional funding.
Begin testing 4 year olds using the PLS-4.
Thank you!!