magnetic field sensors with qubits in diamond
DESCRIPTION
Magnetic field sensors with qubits in diamond. Paola Cappellaro Massachusetts Institute of Technology Nuclear Science and Engineering Department. Promise of qt. metrology. Improved sensitivity Entangled states Feedback, adaptive methods Nano-scale probes - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Magnetic field sensorswith qubits in diamond
Paola CappellaroMassachusetts Institute of Technology
Nuclear Science and Engineering Department
P. Cappellaro —
Promise of qt. metrology• Improved sensitivity– Entangled states– Feedback, adaptive methods
• Nano-scale probes– Proximity to target, nano-materials or biology
applications• Robust metrology– Clocks, based on fundamental physics laws
P. Cappellaro —
Challenges in qt. metrology• Fragility of entangled states– Improved sensitivity implies higher sensitivity to
external noise• Complexity of control for multi-qubit systems– Qubit addressability, control robustness and
fidelity• Unavailable or inefficient quantum readout– Many-body observables, imperfect readouts
P. Cappellaro —
Single-spin magnetometer• Detect magnetic field with Ramsey-type experiment
• Shot-noise limited sensitivity (minimum resolvable field)
– Limited by dephasing time
– Limited by low contrast
τ ~ T2*
ω
[T Hz-½]
x yτ
BDCt
P. Cappellaro —
Single-spin magnetometer• Detect magnetic field with Ramsey-type experiment
• Shot-noise limited sensitivity (minimum resolvable field)
– Limited by dephasing time
– Limited by low contrast
x yτ/2
BAC
t
τ/2
τ ~ T2
ω
[T Hz-½]
Spin echo
P. Cappellaro —
Single-spin magnetometer• Detect magnetic field with Ramsey-type experiment
• Shot-noise limited sensitivity (minimum resolvable field)
– Limited by dephasing time
– Limited by low contrast
x yτ/2
BAC
t
τ/2
τ ~ T2
ω
[T Hz-½]
Spin echoRepeated readout, Improved photon coupling
P. Cappellaro —
MRFM (2006)
Atom chip (2005)
NV nano-tip magnetometer
NV ensemble magnetometer1 cm3 sensor
NV B-field imager1 mm pixels
Technology comparison
P. Cappellaro —
Nuclear spin spectroscopy• Detect nuclear spin noise from
high-density samples• Often T2n >> T2e: correlation
from scan to scan• We can measure the correlation
And reconstruct the correlation function
from KM(τ) and find the power spectral density of the nuclear spin field BN φ
SEM image of fixated E. Coli and simulated scan.Brighter regions correlate with high spin density.
Meriles, ...Cappellaro, JCP 133, 124105 (2010)
P. Cappellaro —
Many-spins magnetometer• Improve the sensitivity by
increasing the number of NV’s
– δB per volume ~ 1/√n (n density)
• Using quantum enhanced techniques,
we could approach the Heisenberg limit
[T Hz-½]
[T Hz-½]
P. Cappellaro —
Many-spins magnetometer• High density by Nitrogen implantation + annealing– Conversion factor f ~ 10-40 %
• 2 error sources
• Use dynamical decoupling control techniques
N (epr) spins
Other NV centers
T2 : 630 μs 280 μs, for nN 1015 cm-3 5 x 1015 cm-3
Stanwix, PRB 82, 201201R (2010)
P. Cappellaro —
APPLICATIONS
P. Cappellaro —
B-field imager– High density, macroscopic samples
• Signal collected on CCD – Diamond divided into pixels
• Imaging of magnetic surfaces – Hard disk drives,
cell dynamics, brain function, …
t
B
Action potential
P. Cappellaro —
Nano-tip magnetometer– Goal: detect a single spin
• A single NV center close to the surface– r0 ~ 10nm from source 1H field: BH ~ 3 nT
• Many spins contribute to the signal
.1nm
B
Δ
Magnetictip
Add magnetic gradientExploit frequency selectivity of AC magnetometry≤ 1nm spatial resolution
P. Cappellaro —
DARK SPIN MAGNETOMETRY
P. Cappellaro —
Parameter estimation• Harness the bath of “dark” nitrogen spins
– B-field is sensed by dark spins, in turns detected by the bright NV center spin
• Parameter estimation via ancillary qubits– Effective evolution:
…
Goldstein, Cappellaro et al., arXiv:1001.0089
P. Cappellaro —
Dark Spins• Sensitivity enhancement is possible even with
random couplings– Control embedded in spin echo
τ/2
t
τ/2
Sens
orDa
rk S
pins
Sensitivity
For strongly coupled spinsWe achieve the Heisenberg limit,
since
P. Cappellaro —
Sensitivity Scaling• Novel type of entangled state– Dark spins and NV decoherence times are similar– Robust against decoherence
• Same noise, N-times more signal
• Compromise between strong coupling and decoherence
P. Cappellaro —
ADAPTIVE METHODS
P. Cappellaro —
Sensitivity Limits• Two limitations:
1. Noise might limit the evolution time to 2. Ambiguity in phase limits to
• Repeated measurements yield the sensitivity
• This is the SQL in the total time– Is there a better way to use the time than doing N
equal measurements?
P. Cappellaro —
Quantum Metrology Limit• Goal: scaling with resources (QML)
• Entangled states (squeezing) can achieve the QML with the number of probes*, – but they are usually fragile or difficult to prepare.
• Adaptive readout schemes can achieve the QML in the total measurement time ,– no entanglement is required
*P. Cappellaro et al., PRA 80, 032311 (2009); PRL 106, 140502 (2011); PRA (2012).
P. Cappellaro —
Adaptive Methods • Update the interrogation scheme based on
previous information (Bayesian method)
• Adaptive rules desiderata:1. Should converge to correct result2. Can achieve a broader measurement bandwidth3. Can converge faster than classical schemes
P. Cappellaro —
Adaptive Methods • Update the interrogation scheme based on
previous information (Bayesian method)
• Adaptive rules desiderata:1. Should converge to correct result2. Can achieve a broader measurement bandwidth3. Can converge faster than classical schemes4. Should be robust against readout (and other) errors
P. Cappellaro —
Noise and Errors• Readout errors propagate in the adaptive
scheme: the QML is lost
C=0.95
P. Cappellaro —
M-pass scheme• Increasing the number of steps recovers the
QML, in the presence of noise and imperfect readout
Update P(j)
Select J’ Set time t’=2t
0 1
x Jt
M=2
Readout contrast C<1
M=n+1N
P. Cappellaro —
M-pass scheme• It recovers the QML even in the presence of
noise and imperfect readout
C=0.95
C=0.85M=n+1
P. Cappellaro —
Efficiency• When is the adaptive method good?– Large frequency range (short )– If a “single measurement” might be
better (Fourier limit)– If large overhead per measurement, adaptive
method might not be so good• Is there a better application of the adaptive
method?
P. Cappellaro —
Quantum Parameter• The adaptive method can measure quantum
parameters– Example: random filed due to a nuclear spin bath– 2-pass scheme still yields the QML
Simulation: 1 NV in bath of 1.1% C-13, initially in thermal state.
P. Cappellaro —
Bath Narrowing• Example: nuclear spin bath of NV center• Knowledge of the “quantum parameter”
corresponds to “narrowing” of the bath
NV spectrum with thermal bath
NV spectrum after bath narrowing via adaptive scheme
P. Cappellaro —
Increase Coherence• Adaptive measurement of nuclear bath
achieves longer coherence time– Adaptive method fixes the state of the bath– Good efficiency: frequency spread s.t.
• No further need for dynamical-decoupling– DD often limits the fields that can be sensed(or the tasks in QIP that can be performed)
P. Cappellaro —
COMPOSITE PULSE MAGNETOMETRY
P. Cappellaro —
DC magnetometry
Ramsey(high sensitivity, short T2)
• Detection of static magnetic fields
P. Cappellaro —
DC magnetometry
Ramsey(short T2, high sensitivity)
• Detection of static magnetic fields
P. Cappellaro —
DC magnetometry
Ramsey(high sensitivity, short T2)
Rabi* (long T2, low sensitivity)
• Detection of static magnetic fields
*Fedder et al., Appl Phys B 102, 497–502 (2011)
P. Cappellaro —
DC magnetometry
Ramsey(short T2, high sensitivity)
Rabi (long T2, low sensitivity)
• Detection of static magnetic fields
P. Cappellaro —
Ramsey(high sensitivity, short T2)
Rabi (long T2, low sensitivity)
+x -x +x -x +x -x…+x -x
Composite pulses magnetometry
Example: Rotary Echo
• Detection of static magnetic fields
• Compromise: – Longer T2 than Ramsey, higher sensitivity than Rabi
• Corrects for mw instability
P. Cappellaro —
Rotary Echo• Intermediate (variable) T2 and sensitivity
P. Cappellaro —
Sensitivity• Higher sensitivity, robust against mw noise• Flexible scheme, adapting to expt. conditions
P. Cappellaro —
Conclusions• Quantum metrology offers many challenges
but even more diverse opportunities for improvement– Control techniques– Adaptive methods– Harnessing the “environment”
• Applications– Detection of static magnetic fields with NV centers– Nuclear spin bath narrowing
P. Cappellaro —
nNV-GYROA stable, three axis gyroscope in diamond
P. Cappellaro —
Spin Gyroscope• Spins are sensitive detectors of rotation– NMR gyroscopes require large volumes because of
inefficient polarization and readout
• NV centers in diamond– allow fast polarization & readout– have much poorer stability
PQE2012 - P. Cappellaro
nNV-Gyro• Combines efficiency of NV electronic spin• with the stability and long coherence time of
the nuclear spin, – preserved even
at high density
PQE2012 - P. Cappellaro
nNV-gyro sensitivity• Using an echo scheme, the nNV-gyro offers
great stability• It could be combined with MEMS gyro, that
are not stable
P. Cappellaro —
Funding NIST DARPA (QuASAR)AFOSR MURI (QuISM)
Publications N. Bar-Gill, L. M. Pham, C. Belthangady, D. Le Sage, P. Cappellaro, J. R. Maze, M. D. Lukin, A. Yacoby, R. Walsworth, Nature Comm. 3, 858 (2012) A. Ajoy and P. Cappellaro "Stable Three-Axis Nuclear Spin Gyroscope in Diamond" arXiv:1205.1494 (2012) P. Cappellaro, Phys. Rev. A 85, 030301(R) (2012) P. Cappellaro, G. Goldstein, J. S. Hodges, L. Jiang, J. R. Maze, A. S. Sørensen, M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev A 85, 032336 (2012) L. M. Pham, N. Bar-Gill, C. Belthangady, D. Le Sage, P. Cappellaro, M. D. Lukin, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, arXiv:1201.5686G. Goldstein, P. Cappellaro, J. R. Maze, J. S. Hodges, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 140502 (2011) L.M. Pham, D. Le Sage, P.L. Stanwix, T.K. Yeung, D. Glenn, A. Trifonov, P. Cappellaro, P.R. Hemmer, M.D. Lukin, H. Park, A. Yacoby and R.L. Walsworth, New J. Phys. 13 045021 (2011) C. A. Meriles, L. Jiang, G. Goldstein, J. S. Hodges, J. R. Maze, M. D. Lukin and P. Cappellaro J. Chem. Phys. 133, 124105 (2010) P.L. Stanwix, L.M. Pham, J.R. Maze, D. Le Sage, T.K. Yeung, P. Cappellaro, P.R. Hemmer, A. Yacoby, M.D. Lukin, R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. B 82, 201201(R) (2010)