may 2019 ’s democratic republic: greater mekong subregion

Social Monitoring Report

Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report July to December 2018 Project 40253-023 and 40253-036 May 2019

Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Greater Mekong

Subregion Biodiversity Conservation Corridors

Project

Prepared by Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the Asian Development Bank.

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

http://www.adb.org/terms-use

SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS MONITORING REPORT July to Dec 2018

Main activities undertaken:

Land Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR)

The key activities related to RP implementation in the reporting period focused on:

Conducting the inventory of loss in four villages (NamOom, PinDong, Khanmaknao and Done) where the residential land acquisition for tap stand of community water supply (Attachment 2)

Conducting the Socio-Economic Survey of Affected Households (SESAH) whose assets will be affected by the community water supply subproject through land acquisition for tap stand (Attachment 2)

Organizing the consultation meeting with AHs in four villages as NamOom, PinDong, Khanmaknao and Done (one meeting per village) to introduce the ADB and GoL, and BCC policy on resettlement and compensation; to explain on the GRM procedure and negotiated settlement for voluntary land donation (Attachment 3)

Ethnic Groups (EGs)

Review the aide memoire resulting from the recent (October 2018) ADB Mid Term Review mission of BCC-FIP and Review Mission of BCC-GMS and prioritize work based upon comments made by ADB

Updating the communication strategy (Attachment1)

Summarizing the history of community consultation Organizing consultations with EG HHs and communities throughout the project’s

activities

Description of monitoring activities carried out (e.g. field visits, survey questionnaire, community consultation meetings, focus group discussion, key informant interview, etc)

Field visit have been frequently conducted by provincial and district safeguards staff to monitor village SPs construction activities to confirm with social safeguards monitoring checklist

Key issues, any corrective actions already taken and any grievances

No any issues raised up in the reporting period

Recommendation

Safeguards Monitoring Report

1. Introduction and Project Overview

Project Title Greater Mekong Sub-region Biodiversity Conservation Corridors Project

Project No. 40253

Type of Project (Loan/Grant/TA) Grant 0242 Lao (SF) and Grant 0488 Lao (SCF)

Safeguards Category Environment

Involuntary Resettlement C

Indigenous Peoples/Ethnic Groups B

Reporting date December 2018

Last report date April 2018

Report prepared by NPMO- Social Development-Safeguards Specialist

2. Involuntary Resettlement Performance Monitoring

Summary of Compliance with RP Requirements

RP Requirements Compliance Status, Yes/No,

Partial

Comments or Reasons for Compliance,

partial Compliance, Non compliance

Issues for Further Action

Safeguard specialist mobilized

Complied Mobilized October 2012 Ongoing until Sept 2019

Community consultation and information dissemination

Complied Completed in 4 villages (NamOom, PinDong, Khanmaknao and Done) on February and September 2018 with total of 26 participants (M=84.6%, F=15.4%) (EG=68.2%)

NFA

Affected HHs and land identified

Completed Total of 4 village subprojects (NamOom, PinDong, Khanmaknao and Done). Socio-Economic survey conducted with AHHs. Attachment 2: SESAH

NFA

DMS conducted, IoL prepared

Completed Total of 4 villages (NamOom, PinDong, Khanmaknao and Done), Total AHHs=22 Total Affected private land = 260.84 m2 (non-productive land).

NFA

Grievance Redress Mechanism disseminated

Completed GRM is functioning and implemented by government line agencies from the village arbitration unit up to central level. Instruction on the procedures for the

NFA

GRM was provided to all target villages at start of project and during feasibility studies and is followed during implementation. So far no grievances have been received. The sample of attendance sheets and minute of village consultation and GRM procedure dissemination is attached in Attachment 3: Attendance sheets and Minute

Negotiated settlements for land and or asset acquisition completed

Completed No land subject to compensation for involuntary land acquisition. Assessed as Category C – no significant impacts. No physical or economic displacement. AHHs donated no more than 2% of non-productive land and. No LARP required

NFA

LARP Livelihood and Restoration Activities

Complied No LARP or restoration activities required, all Subprojects are Category C, minor amounts of land acquired under negotiated settlement. All land donation are attached in Attachment 4: Certificate of land donation

NFA

*NFA- no further action

3. Ethnic Group Performance Monitoring

EGF Requirements Compliance Status, Yes/No, Partial

Comments or Reasons for Compliance, partial Compliance, Non compliance

Issues for Further Action

Ethnic Group Categorization

B Based on ADB screening criteria

NFA

Social safeguard specialist mobilized

Complied Mobilized October 2012 Ongoing until Sept 2019

Consultations conducted with EG HHs and communities

Complied From April to December 2018, there are 318 consultations conducted with target villages

Ongoing and will continue to follow up

throughout the project’s activities and each consultation meeting is maintained a register (A4 book) of village consultations and other meetings and activities in each village by recording a minute which contains the (1) date, time and purpose of consultation / meeting (2) names of key person involved plus numbers of attendees (gender separated) (3) items discussed (4) responses from community / individuals (5) decisions taken and agreements reached and (6) follow-up actions to be taken, by whom and by when. Digital copies of the minutes are submitted to District / Province and to higher level as necessary.

Local translators used for consultation and dissemination of project information

Complied Of 84 villages, 63 are EG. Translation assistance seconded from the LWU, LFNC and DAFO as needed. Besides, village cluster head, village chief village LWU have been contacted to be translator. In addition,

Non-text and ICE materials also developed for use with ethnic and illiterate people where applicable

Ongoing as needed

Separate men’s and women’s discussion groups convened

Complied Conduct during identify the subproject selection, problems to prepare the village development plan (VDP), identify community priorities and feasibility study on community support development of FIP and internal project impact assessment, and will be

Ongoing

consulted for activity evaluations. The activities and findings from women group discussion have prioritized kept in the ranking list of village activity

Women facilitate women’s group meeting

Complied Resources seconded from LWU as needed to facilitate women’s focal groups.

Ongoing

Grievance Resolution Mechanism disseminated

Completed GRM is functioning and implemented by government line agencies from the village arbitration unit up to central level. Instruction on the procedures for the GRM was provided to all target villages at start of project and during feasibility studies and is followed during implementation. So far no grievances have been received.

Continue to follow up

Training and participation details disaggregated by sex and ethnicity

Complied The training participation since April to December 2018. Of 8,685 participants, 5,502 (63.4%) and 5,564 (64.1%) are female and ethnic groups respectively.

Ongoing

4. Information on Disclosure and Socialization including Capability Building

(1) Community training and information dissemination throughout the project’s activities

No.

Topics of training Date Location Number of participants

Total No. of F

% F No. of EG

% EG

1 Village forest management plan and village patrolling with using the record forms

Apr-

Dec

2018

67 v

illages

270 32 11.9 270 100.0

2 Awareness on ANR regulation and wildfire protection and management

986 361 36.6 633 64.2

3 Maintenance 113 34 30.1 113 100.0

techniques on forest planting and ANR

4 Techniques on livestock rearing for poultry, pig and goat

149 128 85.9 98 65.8

5 cash crops and home garden cultivation (rice, sweet corn, taro and vegetables), including nutrition awareness

7,054 4847 68.7 4,434 62.9

6 Industry and fruit tree planting

113 100 88.5 16 14.2

Total 8,685 5,502 63.4 5,564 64.1

(2) Community consultation and information dissemination throughout the project’s activities (April-December 2018)

No. of

Total

No. of F % of F No. of

EG

% of EG

1 Social Safeguards/Gender 18 525 200 38% 511 97%

- Paddy field FS and safeguards consultation 12 496 191 39% 496 100%

- AH consulation and social monitoring 6 29 9 31% 15 52%

2 Patrolling (SMART) 6 185 51 28% 185 100%

- Community contracts on patrolling 6 185 51 28% 185 100%

3 Rural Infrastructure Development 14 110 37 34% 50 45%

- Subproject monitoring 12 65 26 40% 5 8%

- UXO survey 2 45 11 24% 45 100%

4 Reforestation and Conservation 126 5,534 2,685 49% 4,721 85%

- Maintenance of forest planting 8 412 141 34% 95 23%

- Remarcation and post inspection 7 93 16 17% 57 61%

- ANR zoning identification/ANR survey 7 433 179 41% 433 100%

- Participatory ANR Regul. Development 20 1,079 505 47% 748 69%

- Protection and Management of Wildfire 24 852 442 52% 782 92%

- Village FMC establishment 7 120 22 18% 120 100%

- Community contract on Tree planting & transporting 7 1,578 901 57% 1,578 100%

- Com. contract on agro-forestry dev. 16 326 191 59% 267 82%

- Com. contract on maintenance of forest plantation 12 283 116 41% 283 100%

- Community contract on VCC 10 68 13 19% 68 100%

- Survey for tree planting on private land 4 160 91 57% 160 100%

- Need assessment of tree planting on private land 4 130 68 52% 130 100%

5 Village Development Fund (VDF) 100 1,272 657 52% 951 75%

- Repayment of VDF 67 1,204 632 52% 916 76%

- Review on VDF implementation 33 68 25 37% 35 51%

6 Extension activities 37 1,439 791 55% 427 30%

- Follow up the extension activities and lesson learnt 28 998 596 60% 105 11%

- Home garden/crop identification 7 391 177 45% 272 70%

- Participatory on activity implementation 2 50 18 36% 50 100%

7 Monitoring and Evaluation 17 235 138 59% 137 58%

- ADB Review Mission 9 69 43 62% 56 81%

- Project/steering committee follow up act 1 7 2 29% 7 100%

- Pre-test Internal Project Evaluation 2 85 55 65% - 0%

- VDF &Livelihood evaluation 5 74 38 51% 74 100%

SUM 318 9,300 4,559 49% 6,982 75%

No. Topics of consultation with EG HH and communities No. of

Village

No. of Participants

5. Grievance Redress Mechanism

Providing the GRM and its procedure/steps to all project target villages during village consultation, sub-project selection, sub-project feasibility study and village development plan preparation.

6. Conclusion

Project activities are fully compliant with RP and EGF requirements

Some activities are ongoing and continue to be followed up

Attachment 1: BCCP Communication Strategy

Updated: October 2018

A. Consultation

1. Project preparation has been conducted with stakeholder agencies in the Government of Lao PDR at national, provincial and district levels including MAF, Ministries of Planning and Investment, Public Works and Transport, Water Resources and Environment Administration, and the National Land Management Authority. Consultations have also been held with the mass organizations, the Lao Women Union and the Lao Front for National Construction which has responsibility for ethnic minority affairs. Specific business scan meetings have been held in the participating provinces with the private sector involved with commercial agriculture to determine their constraints and capacity. Meetings have been regularly conducted in the villages with village-based organizations, the community and village leaders, project beneficiaries and affected persons, focusing on project plans, land use planning, infrastructure subproject selection, afforestation and livelihood improvement activities and other aspects. Requirements for ensuring appropriate levels of consultation for preparation and implementation of the different activities have been developed.

2. Initial activity proposal preparation includes consultation which involves documented evidence of inclusive consultation with all communities in the project area and participant information on numbers of women and men by ethnic grouping. Subproject socio-economic/gender surveys that identify vulnerable groups provide the basis for specific consultation and participation mechanisms which are followed during implementation.

3. During the Project, the consultation process is followed throughout the feasibility study, detailed design and construction phases of each subproject to afford community groups and individuals the opportunity to voice their views on how the subproject and activity is designed, implemented, operated and maintained. In addition, associated initiatives are built into the design of each subproject and activity to enhance the impact from and sustainability of investments in rural infrastructure, livelihood improvement and afforestation. These associated initiatives are identified in a participatory manner from a menu of options developed with the respective stakeholders and beneficiaries and designed to strengthen community-based organizations such as the women groups, the women’s unions, village mediation units, producers and marketing groups, and other groups. Also included are the committees for afforestation, forest management, patrolling and village development fund management supported under the project.

B. Participation

4. The communities are mobilized in a number of different ways during activity design, implementation, operation and monitoring. During activity design and preparation stages, community participation consists primarily of their contribution through the consultation process. In supporting participation, face to face discussion using commonly spoken Lao language with local translators and / or directly using the languages spoken in the target

village, is standard procedure for communication. This ensures the community is aware of project activities and has meaningful opportunities to share their perspectives and concerns. In addition, community materials such as leaflets, brochures, posters, fliers and etc. are developed and used to ensure all stakeholders including the low literacy ethnic groups have clearly understood the project information, benefits and impacts. These also include presentation of information in pictorial formats for the villages without written language, villagers with low literacy skills and for the very young.

6. During the infrastructure construction phases and other project activity implementation, significant opportunities for active participation, particularly for poor households and women-headed households to benefit from the subproject and project activities through provision of wage labor to the contractors is promoted This is encouraged through the bidding documents which request contractors and other service providers to investigate this option, whenever possible.

5. The community is also required to participate in the operation, management and maintenance of the completed infrastructure whenever possible through provision of labor or in some cases materials and funds.

C. Awareness and information dissemination

6. Experience has demonstrated the importance of community participation in achieving sustainable development including appropriate and well-designed projects. To ensure adequate participation of the community, it must first be well-informed and therefore adequate opportunities are given for everyone to participate if they wish.

7. Information about the Project and the infrastructure subprojects in particular,

including the objectives, potential environmental impact, implementation arrangements,

resettlement and compensation matters, gender issues, issues of concerns for ethnic

minorities are provided to beneficiaries. Information is provided through village meetings,

pamphlets, and other announcements in both Lao language and the language(s) of the

communities whenever appropriate. The community is fully informed of issues such as their

right to participate in this sub-project and to be compensated for any loss of property

including productive land and / or assets as well as gender equity and other relevant policies.

Separate meetings and discussions are arranged with the people who are directly affected by

land acquisition and/or resettlement issues. The community and particularly the affected

households are provided with detailed guidance and procedures regarding resettlement and

compensation.

D. Grievance Redress Mechanism

8. The mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of any affected persons concerns,

complaints, and grievances is provided and all communities are appropriately informed about

such mechanism. A culturally appropriate, gender responsive, and accessible mechanism is

formulated but shall not impede access to the country’s judicial or administrative remedies.

9. The Lao PDR judicial system at the local level is based on Village Mediation

Committees normally used for grievances against local government agencies, civil actions

and minor criminal matters. Should issues not be resolved at the village level, an appeals

process at district and provincial levels are made available. The districts are grouped into a

sub-Provincial region. As this structure and mechanism exists the project utilizes these

Committees for grievance redress.

10. In each village, an awareness campaign is conducted to ensure that all community

members (women and men of all ethnic groups) are made to understand the roles,

responsibilities and processes of the Village Mediation Committee. Affected persons are

exempted from all administrative and legal fees incurred pursuant to the grievance redress

procedures. All complaints received in writing from affected beneficiaries are documented

and acted upon immediately according to the procedures detailed above.

E. Reporting

11. The project maintains a register (A4 book) of village consultations and other

meetings and activities in each village by recording a minute which contains the (1) date,

time and purpose of consultation / meeting (2) names of key person involved plus numbers

of attendees (gender separated) (3) items discussed (4) responses from community /

individuals (5) decisions taken and agreements reached and (6) follow-up actions to be

taken, by whom and by when. Digital copies of the minutes are submitted to District /

Province and to higher level as necessary.

12. The project prepares progress reports on activities and achievements, guidelines and

other documents to MAF and ADB in the languages and formats and at the intervals

specified in the PAM.

Attachment2: Socio-Economic Survey of Affected Households

As a part of the Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS), a Socio-Economic Survey of Affected

Households (SESAH) was conducted with owners whose assets will be affected by the

subproject through land acquisition for the tap stand of community water supply in four

villages – Nam Oom in Pathoumphone, PinDong, Khanmaknao and Done in Sanamxai. The

details are summarized in Attachment 2.1 and an extract given in Table 1 as following

Table1: Summary of SESAH

Aspects Items

Demography - The AHs live in village more than 47 years. Average size of household is about 5.1 family members and the distribution of sex with 53.1% male and 46.9% female. 53.9% of household members are under 18 years and between 31-45 years. They are Lao Loum (32.8%); Brao (27.3%); Sah (27.3%) and Yru (13.6%). They speak Lao and their own dialect language, belief in Buddhism and sprit. Household classified as the medium household. 89.4% among female members and 95.4% of male members have completed and attended primary and secondary schools.

Head of AHs:

95.5% are male and 4.5% are female; 100% of households head and their spouses are younger than 65 year

of age; not disabled, be owner of land and have their own activities as farmers;

90.9% are literate

Livelihood Income contributions:

- 100% of the head of AH and their spouse contribute to the family’s income are self-employed and provide an annual income of rounded 6.2 million LAK and 5.1 million LAK per year respectively;

HH members responsible for income sources:

- 90.9% of income sources of AHs are from the head and their spouse, while 9.1% from all family members.

Income sources:

- Agriculture and livestock are the based economy for each AH, followed by NTFP collection accounts for 86% and 41%; respectively. While the third groups are manual labours, Salary/Wage and forestry/Timbers account for 23%, 14% and 9% respectively.

Appraisal of income and expenditures:

Estimated average monthly incomes are about 1.4 million LAK/AH/month adding up to an annual income of rounded 16.9 million LAK/AH/year

Estimated average monthly expenditure are about 0.6 million LAK/AH/month leading to a total amount of expenses of rounded 7.9 million LAK/AH/year

Areas of expenses totally used for family care; inputs for income activities, socio-cultural obligations, transport and housing with account

Aspects Items

for 55.1%; 24.9%; 10.6%; 5.6% and 3.7% respectively

Land Acquisition and Compensation

Affectedness of AHs:

To be ownership of non-productive land, 81.8% is belong to the head of households, while 9.1% is on both names (head of HH and their spouse);

100% of each plot of non-productive land has the land title/certificate;

22 households would be affected on their non-productive land by the subproject because of necessary for installing tap stand of village water supply. The non-productive land will be required 260.84 m2 or approximately 1.26% of total non-productive land. However, the subproject will not impact on productive land, crops, trees and any permanent structures.

Donation of Assets and AH feedback:

Concerning the affected, the land owners are 100% willingness to provide these assets to the subproject as their contribution and would accept the loss of portions of their residential land as they expect to bring them clean water as well as saving time for collecting water for domestic use. They are not required any compensation cost as they donated to the subproject and the voluntary land donation agreement also made.

ATTACHMENT 2.1: Summary of SESAH

1 Demographic charecteristics

1.1 Head of household Percent

21 95.5%

1 4.5%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

20 90.9%

2 9.1%

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

1.2 Spouse of head of household Percent

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

21 100.0%

0 0.0%

18 81.8%

4 18.2%

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

6 100.0%

1.3 Family Percent

Residency in village Year 47.3

113

Male members 60 53.1%

53 113 46.9%

37 32.7%

24 21.2%

24 21.2%

25 22.1%

3 2.7%

7 31.8%

15 68.2%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

13 59.1%

9 40.9%

0 0.0%

22 100.0%

0 0.0%

2 Education and Work/Income

2.1 Education Percent

6 10.5%

41 71.9%

10 17.5%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.8%

34 60.7%

20 35.7%

1 1.8%

0 0.0%

2.2 Status and Income Contribution Percent

0 0.00%

30 100.00%

Kip/year 5,160,000

0 0.0%

31 100.0%

Kip/year 6,200,000

Males per work and income

Employee or government staffNumbers 31 from 60

Self employed or other own works/jobs

Annual income of any source by males Aver. Male household member/s annual income

Total

Females per work and

income

Employee or government staffNumbers 30 from 53

Self employed or other own works/jobs

Annual income of any source by females Aver. Female household member/s annual income

Not attending school

56

Primary school

Secondary school-High school

Colleage/University

No Formal education

Total

Females per school grade

Not attending school

Numbers

57

Primary school

Secondary school-High school

Colleage/University

No Formal education

Males per school grade

Others

Stataus

Wealthy/rich

22Middle/average

Poor/Not enough/limted

[1 for case]

22Others

LanguageLao

22Others

ReligionBuddhism

22

18-30

31-45

46-65

> 65

EthnicityLao

Family size

Family members

Numbers

PersonsWith an average of

members in HH

Female members 5.1

Number per age

< 18

113

WidowedYes

6No

Total

Year on average

Owner of landYes

22No

OccupationOwn activities/self-employed

22Working for others

Not working

LiterateYes

22No

DisabledYes

22No

Total

SexMale

[1 for case]

22Female

AgeUp to 65

21Older than 65

OccupationOwn activities/self-employed

22Working for others

Not working

WidowedYes

22No

DisabledYes

22No

Owner of landYes

22No

Up to 6522

Older than 65

LiterateYes

22No

ITEM ANALYSIS

Total

SexMale

[1 for case]

22Female

Age

3 Economic Features

Total Average/HH Percent HH

KIP KIP Cases Households Related ranking

Kip/year - #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

Head & their spouse 88,500,000 8,850,000 10

5,000,000 5,000,000 1

136,000,000 17,000,000 8

229,500,000 12,078,947 19 1

Kip/year 6,000,000 6,000,000 1

- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

41,900,000 4,655,556 9

73,300,000 3,857,895 19 1


- #DIV/0! 0

Head & their spouse - #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0 0

Kip/year 10,000,000 10,000,000 1

- #DIV/0! 0


10,000,000 10,000,000 1

- #DIV/0! 0

20,000,000 10,000,000 2 5


2,000,000 2,000,000 1


- #DIV/0! 0

21,200,000 3,028,571 7

27,200,000 3,022,222 9 2

Kip/year 600,000 600,000 1

- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

600,000 600,000 1 6

Kip/year 6,000,000 6,000,000 1

4,200,000 2,100,000 2


500,000 500,000 1

2,500,000 2,500,000 1

13,200,000 2,640,000 5 3


- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0 0

Kip/year 6,200,000 2,066,667 3

- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

6,200,000 2,066,667 3 4


- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0 0

Kip/year 2,000,000 2,000,000 1

- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

2,000,000 2,000,000 1 6


- #DIV/0! 0


- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0

- #DIV/0! 0 0

Kip/year 372,000,000 by 22 16,909,091 aver. Annual HH income

Kip/month 31,000,000 1,409,091 Aver. Monthly HH income

Son/Doaugther own or in law

All

sum

Estimated incomesAHs provided data

5%Spouse


All

sum

Others

Head

00%

Spouse


All

sum

Services

Head

1

14%Spouse


All

sum

Pension

Head

00%

Spouse


All

sum

Salary/Wage

Head

3

23%Spouse


All

sum

Business/Trade

Head

00%

Spouse


All

sum

Manual labour

Head

5

41%Spouse


All

sum

Wildlife

Head

15%

Spouse


All

sum

NTFP

Head

9

0%Spouse


All

sum

Forestry (Timbers)

Head

29%

Spouse


All

sum

Fishery

Head

0

86%Spouse


All

sum

Livestock

Head

1986%

Spouse

Income

sources/Activities

Household members Number of

Agriculture

Head

19

3.2Distribution

% of HHs performing this

income act.

96,000,000 55.1%

6,500,000 3.7%

18,400,000 10.6%

9,800,000 5.6%

43,400,000 24.9%

Kip/year 174,100,000 by 22 7,913,636 aver. Annual HH expenditure

Kip/month 14,508,333 659,470 Aver. Monthly HH expenditure

3.3 % of cases

- 0.0%

- 0.0%

20 90.9%

- 0.0%

2 9.1%

4 Affected Assets % of cases

20 90.9%

- 0.0%

1 4.5%

Four 1 4.5%

22 residential parcel/hh

- agricultural plot/hh

[Years] #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

[Years] 46

22 100.0%

- 0.0%

- 0.0%

- 0.0%

18 81.8%

2 9.1%

2 9.1%

22 100.0%

- 0.0%

- 0.0%

- 0.0%

22 100.0%

- 0.0%

[Years] #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

[Years] #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

[Years] #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

- #DIV/0!

Mitigation options

In-kind

0in-Cash

Donation

Decision later

Others

None

Head of HH0Spouse

Both

4.7

Affected structures

Use of land Years on average

Ownership

Owning

[1 for case]

0Renting

Head of HH0Spouse

Both

Mitigation options

In-kind

0in-Cash

Donation

Decision later

4.6

Affected Trees


Ownership

Owning

[1 for case]

0None

Head of HH0Spouse

Both

Mitigation options

In-kind

0in-Cash

Donation

Decision later

4.5

Affected crops


Ownership

Owning

[1 for case]

0None

Land title/CertificateYes

22No

Mitigation options

In-kind

22in-Cash

Donation

Decision later

Others

None

Head of HH22Spouse

Both

4.4

Affected residentail land


Ownership

Owning

[1 for case]

22

Details are provided by the

inventory of loss

Renting

Land title/CertificateYes

0No

Mitigation options

In-Kind

0in-Cash

Donation

Decision later

Others

None

Head of HH0Spouse

Both

4.3

Affected productive land


Ownership

Owning

[1 for case]

0Renting

4.2 Parcel of landResidential

[Numbers]100%

Productive #DIV/0!

Adult children involved

All

Total cases

4.1Families using the land

One

[1 for case] 22Two

Three

Estimated expendituresAHs provided data

Household members responsible for income sources Total cases

Persons

Head only

[1 for case] 22

Spouse only

Head and spouse

Areas of expenses

Family care

Kip/year Areas of expenses

Housing

Socio-cultural obligations

Transport

Inputs for income activities

Household's expenditure TotaL Amount

ATTACHMENT 2.2: Photo of Village Consultation, Data collection and Field survey

Photo 1: AH consultation on site selection of subproject and land acquisition

Photo 2: Conducting socio-economic survey with AH

ATTACHMENT 2.3: Detailed Measurement Survey

Population Residential

land

Productive

land

Width Length Affected

residential

land

Affected

productive

land

Affected

portion

Land Use Unit

Value

Total value

of affected

land

Fence Shelter Unit

value

Total value

of affected

structues

Type Total Aff.

Trees

Portion

of Total

Unit

Value

Total Value of

Aff. Trees

[No] [m2] [m

2] [m] [m] [m

2] [m

2] [%] - [KN/m

2] [KN] [m] [Unit] [KN] [KN] - [No] [No] [%] [KN] [KN] [KN]

1 1 Ms. Sim NamOom 4 256.00 5.12 2.00% Non-pro. Land

2 1 Ms. Choum NamOom 5 625.00 5.12 0.82% Non-pro. Land

3 1 Mr. Sengkeo NamOom 4 900.00 5.12 0.57% Non-pro. Land

4 1 Mr. KhamSone NamOom 7 900.00 5.12 0.57% Non-pro. Land

5 1 Mr. Souan NamOom 5 2,500.00 5.12 0.20% Non-pro. Land

6 1 Mr. Khemphone NamOom 8 2,000.00 5.12 0.26% Non-pro. Land

7 1 Mr. Souk NamOom 5 180.00 5.12 2.84% Non-pro. Land

8 1 Mr. Khamphone PinDong 7 1,050.00 15.00 1.43% Non-pro. Land

9 1 Mr. Bounmee PinDong 3 800.00 15.00 1.88% Non-pro. Land

10 1 Mr. Bounmai PinDong 5 1,600.00 15.00 0.94% Non-pro. Land

11 1 Mr. Khamsai Khanmaknao 7 1,071.00 15.00 1.40% Non-pro. Land

12 1 Mr. Phouvong Khanmaknao 4 789.00 15.00 1.90% Non-pro. Land

13 1 Mr. Bounsou Khanmaknao 6 1,200.00 15.00 1.25% Non-pro. Land

14 1 Ms. Viengxay Khanmaknao 4 500.00 15.00 3.00% Non-pro. Land

15 1 Mr. Khanh Khanmaknao 5 1,000.00 15.00 1.50% Non-pro. Land

16 1 Mr. Mon Khanmaknao 4 790.00 15.00 1.90% Non-pro. Land

17 1 Mr. Kham Done 6 750.00 15.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

18 1 Mr. Do Done 6 750.00 15.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

19 1 Mr. Vai Done 4 750.00 15.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

20 1 Mr. Hin Done 4 750.00 15.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

21 1 KhamTanh Done 3 750.00 15.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

22 1 Mr. Somboun Done 7 750.00 15.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

Private 113 20,661.00 260.84 1.26% Non-pro. Land

Communal - - -

Residential 113 20,661.00 260.84 1.26% Non-pro. Land

Productive - - -

Female 3 1,381.00 25.24 1.83% Non-pro. Land

Male 19 19,280.00 235.60 1.22% Non-pro. Land

NamOom 38 7,361.00 35.84 0.49% Non-pro. Land

PinDong 15 3,450.00 45.00 1.30% Non-pro. Land

Khanmaknao 30 5,350.00 90.00 1.68% Non-pro. Land

Done 30 4,500.00 90.00 2.00% Non-pro. Land

Note: there is only one AH is affected on the residential land, however the compensation cost for this impact is not required by AH as he donated for subproject

Source: Meeting in the village and Detailed Measurement Survey, date 4/2/2018

by village

NamOom Village Water Supply

A. Communal Land

B. Private Land

Totals

by ownership of land

by type of land

by sex of household head

Overall Trees Affected Trees and Crops Total

Compensation

costs

Female Male Name Village

Ser.

No

Households Total land Affected land Affected structures

ATTACHMENT 3: Minutes of AH consultation meeting

Date: February 4, 2018 Location: NamOom Village

Attendants: Villagers 8 (3 female, 5 male) Staff 3 (2 PPMO, 1 Consultant)

ATTACHMENT 3.1: Attendance sheet

ATTACHMENT 4: Certificate of Land donation

1. Ms. Chandi, NamOom village

2. Ms. Joom, NamOom village

3. Mr. Khamsone, NamOom village

4. Mr. Khemphone, NamOom village

5. Mr. Seng, NamOom village

6. Ms. Sim, NamOom village

7. Mr. Soukthi, NamOom village

8. Mr. KhamPhone, PinDong village

9. Mr. Bounmee, PinDong village

10. Mr. Boun Mai, PinDong village

11. Mr. Kham, Done village

12. Mr. Do, Done village

13. Mr. Vai, Done village

14. Mr. Hin, Done village

15. Mr. KhamTanh, Done village

16. Mr. Someboun, Done village

17. Mr. Khamsai, Khanmaknao village

18. Mr. Phouvong, Khanmaknao village

19. Mr. Bounsou, Khanmaknao village

20. Ms. Viengxay, Khanmaknao village

21. Mr. Khanh, Khanmaknao village

22. Mr. Mon, Khanmaknao village

may 2019 ’s democratic republic: greater mekong subregion

Documents