measuring soc or salutogenesis - uib
TRANSCRIPT
MEASURING SOC OR SALUTOGENESIS – Does it matter?
Ph
oto
: Eri
ca L
ind
blo
m
International Seminar on Salutogenesis: A theory of health, rather than of diseaseSeminar in honour of Professor Maurice Mittelmark, Bergen, 3 June 2016
MONICA ERIKSSONASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
UNIVERSITY WEST, SWEDEN
Chapter 11
The sense of coherence in the salutogenic model of health
Monica Eriksson
Chapter 12
The sense of coherence and its measurement
Monica Eriksson and Maurice Mittelmark
THE STRUCTURE OF THE SENSE OF COHERENCE
SOC-29SOC-13
FSOC
CSOCWorkSOC
SOC-16
SOC-11
SOC-10
SOC-9
SOC-7
SOC-3
Note that the use of some form of the SOC is associated with copyright. The copyright holder is Dr Avishai [email protected]
Permission for research purposes can further be given by Bengt Lindström, bengt.lindströ[email protected] and Monica Eriksson, [email protected]
The questionnaire is intended for research purposes
only, and may not be used for diagnostic or clinical
use. By "diagnostic or clinical" it is meant that the
SOC score cannot be the basis of any kind of
physical, mental, cognitive, social or emotional
diagnosis or assessment of the respondent, and
cannot direct therapeutic or medical decisions of
any kind.
New phenomenon has emerged: The SOC scale is, without permission, used to evaluate interventions and activities.
Reliability: SOC-29 test-retest correlations range from 0.69 to 0.78 (1 year), 0.64 (3
years), 0:42 to 00:45 (4 years), 0:59 to 0.67 (5 years) and finally 0:54 after the 10-year
follow-up. The internal consistency measured by Cronbach’s alpha ranges from 0.70 to
0.95 using SOC-29 (124 studies), 0.70 to 0.92 (127 studies) using SOC-13 (ibid, p.
463). The sense of coherence scale shows high internal consistency.
(Eriksson & Lindström, 2005)
Source: Mittelmark et al. (Eds.) (2016) The Handbook on Salutenesis. New York: Springer.
© M
on
ica
Erik
sso
n
The SOC-29 and the
SOC-13 have been used
in at least 49 different
languages in at least 48
different countries
around the world
Bringsén Å, Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G. Development and quality analysis of the SalutogenicHealth Indicator Scale (SHIS). Scand J Publ Health 2009; 37:13-9
Nilsson P, Bringsén Å, Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G. Development and Quality analysis of the Work Experience Measurement Scale (WEMS). WORK 2010; 35: 153-161.
DEVELOPING NEW ITEMS MEASURING SALUTOGENIC FACTORS?
Please inform me [email protected]
and we can chare the new developmentswith each other
Ph
oto
: Eri
ca L
ind
blo
m
Salutogenesis is more than the sense of coherence
We have to look behind the facade and identify salutogenic factors in the environment and abilities of people
What is the soul of salutogenesis?
The epistomological
knowledge is unclear
THE SALUTOGENIC UMBRELLA
Measuring SOC – what is the benefit of that?
Development of new measures?
Interventions are called for - How do we strengthen the SOC? New GRRs and SSRs?
Measuring Salutogenesis?
What does it mean to salutogenic?
Developing salutogenic health indicators?