metabolism, energetic, and the pathway to disability in older persons luigi ferrucci, md chief –...
TRANSCRIPT
Metabolism, Energetic,and the Pathway to
Disability in Older Persons
Luigi Ferrucci, MD
Chief – Longitudinal Studies Section,Clinical Research Branch
National Institute on AgingBaltimore, MD
Preferred Walking Speed Declines with Age
Age (years)
20 40 60 80 100
PW
S (
m/s
ec
)
0
1
2
Preferred Walking SpeedPredicts Mortality
0.50
0.75
1.00
0 2 4 6
Follow-up (years)
PWS lowest quintile
PWS second
tofifth quintile
Long rank test p<0.0001
Ble & Ferrucci (unpublished)
Cancer
Ble & Ferrucci (unpublished)
The Homeostatic Network in the BLSA
CNS
PNS
Muscles
Bone, Joints
Energy
Feedback
Insul., Ghrelin, Leptin, Adiponectin, Resistin, IGF-1, Testosterone, Estradiol, DHEAs, Cortisol, Thyroid, PTH
PCR, IL-6, sIL-6r, gp130, TNF-α, TNFr1, TNFr2, IL-18, IL-15, Homocysteine
Heart Rate Variability
Carbonylated Proteins
Food Intake, VitD,VitB12, Folate, VitE,Albumin
Self-ReportAccelerometer
Hormones
Inflammation
Autonomic
Nutrition
Phys Activity
Ox Stress
Mobility DomainsHomeostatic Network
Mobility
Outcome
No. NeurologicalSymptoms
MuscleStrength
Cortical BoneDensity Heart Rate
VisualAcuity
Nerve ConductionVelocity
0.21 0.11
0.110.02
0.06
0.180.07
0.050.09
0.12 0.23
0.14
0.00
Age-Adjusted r=0.13 (p<.001)
Correlations Between Rates of Change inPhysiological Parameters Important for Mobility
(InCHIANTI, n=1055)
0.51 0.41
0.310.32
0.26
0.380.27
0.250.29
0.42 0.53
0.45
0.00
Crude Average r=0.39 (p<.001)
Inflammation
Autonomic
Food Intake
Physical Activity
Ox Stress
Homeostatic Network
Oxygen Consumption
Cognitive Activity
Resting Metabolic Rate
Hormones
input
output
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Mass [log(grams)]
0
1
2
3
4
RM
R [
log(
mlO
2g
-1)]
Elephant
Domestic CattleHuman
CheetahCoyote
Rabbit Bandicut
Wood Duck
Dwarf Lemur
Rat
Ruddy Turdstone
NorthenBirch Mouse
(4.8-0.38) Savi'spygmy shrew
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Mass [log(grams)]
0
1
2
3
4
RM
R [
log(
mlO
2g
-1)]
Elephant
Domestic CattleHuman
CheetahCoyote
Rabbit Bandicut
Wood Duck
Dwarf Lemur
Rat
Ruddy Turdstone
NorthenBirch Mouse
(4.8-0.38) Savi'spygmy shrew
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.5
2.0
3.5
Mass [log(grams)]
Ma
x L
ife S
pa
n [
log(
year
s)] (4.8-4.8) Human
Domestic Cattle
(4.18-6.5) ElephantCoyote
Cheetah
Wood Duck
Rabbit Bandicut
RatNorthenBirch Mouse
Savi'spygmy shrew
Ruddy Turdstone
Dwarf Lemur
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.5
2.0
3.5
Mass [log(grams)]
Ma
x L
ife S
pa
n [
log(
year
s)] (4.8-4.8) Human
Domestic Cattle
(4.18-6.5) ElephantCoyote
Cheetah
Wood Duck
Rabbit Bandicut
RatNorthenBirch Mouse
Savi'spygmy shrew
Ruddy Turdstone
Dwarf Lemur
1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
RM
R [
log(
mlO
2g
-1)]
Max Life Span [log(years)]
Human
Elephant
Coyote
Domestic Cattle
CheetahDwarf Lemur
Wood Duck
Rabbit Bandicut
Rat
Ruddy Turdstone
NorthenBirch Mouse
(4.8-1.16) Savi'spygmy shrew
1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
RM
R [
log(
mlO
2g
-1)]
[log(years)]
Human
Elephant
Coyote
Domestic Cattle
CheetahDwarf Lemur
Wood Duck
Rabbit Bandicut
Rat
Ruddy Turdstone
NorthenBirch Mouse
(4.8-1.16) Savi'spygmy shrew
Data on RMR, body mass and maximum life span are plotted from 241 (153 terrestrial and 88 avian) animals. from the AnAge Database (http://genomics.senescence.info/species/query.php).
Ruggiero C, Ferrucci L. The Endeavor of High Maintenance Homeostasis: Resting Metabolic Rate and theLegacy of LongevityJ Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 May;61(5):466-73.
Figure 1. Maximum life-span estimates in various populations. Mutations or (caloric restriction) increase maximum survival in mice by ~50% at most. In contrast, porcupine longevity is greater by about 500%.
Richard A. Miller. The Anti-Ageing Sweepstakes: Catalase Runs for the ROSes
Science (2005) 308, 1875-6.
Rodents
Mammals
Mouse
Porcupine
Mutant Mouse
Human
Bowhead Whale
Maximum Life Span (years)0 50 100 150 200 250
Lifespan of DogsSize Isn’t Everything
Papillon (3 kg) Labrador (30 kg) Great Dane (63 kg)15 years 12 Years 8 years
From Speakman et al. Dog Metabolism and Life Expectancy. Ageing Cell (2003) 2, 265-275.
Per
cen
tag
e o
f E
ner
gy
Uti
liza
tio
n p
er D
ay
100
50
0
RMR
60% – 70%
Physical Activity
15% - 30%Reduced Phys. Activity (- 46%)
Reduced RMR (- 44%)
60
Age (years)
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 20 40 60 80 100
RM
R (
k c
a l
/ K
g /
d i
e ) MEB
Enzymatic Activity
Es. Na+K+ATPase
Lean Body Mass
Post-Prandial Thermogenesis
8% -12 %
Other Thermogenesis 2% – 3%
Unknown
Delayed Thermogenic Zenith and Reduced Thermogenesis (-10%)
Gastric Emptying
(Wilson AA, J Appl Physiol 2003)
RMR and Longevity
Higher RMR is associated with Excess Mortality (BLSA)
20 25 30 35 40 45
Basal Metabolic Rate (kcal/hr/m2)
-1
0
1
2
Exc
essi
ve M
ort
alit
y
Res
tin
g M
eta
bo
lic R
ate
, (k
cal/
m2 /
hr)
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
25
30
35
4035-49 years
C
Age,(years)
10
Age at Study Entry
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Res
tin
g M
eta
bo
lic R
ate
, (k
cal/
m2 /
hr)
25
30
35
10
Predicted RMR by decade
40
<35 years
50+ years
Longitudinal Changes in RMR in the General Population and According to Mortality
MVO2maxPost-Prandial andOther Thermogenesis
Physical and CognitiveActivities(Walking, Talking,Watching, Thinking, etc.)
Theoretical MinimumEnergy Requirement For Homeostasis(Age, Sex, BodyComposition and Physical Activity)
Extra Energy forUnstable Homeostasis(Homeostatic Effort)
Behavior
Bed Rest
Behavioral Disability
SedentaryState
Low PhysicalActivity
Moderate PhysicalActivity
Intense PhysicalActivity
Competitive PhysicalActivity
FIT
TN
ES
S
An Extended Model of Energetic Frailty
Fatigue
PWS and fuel selection
00.5 1.1 1.6 2.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
*
*
*
*
Willis et al. 2005
PWS
Fu
el o
xid
atio
n (
cal*
min
-1*K
g-1)
Fatty acid utilization
Carbohydrate utilization
Walking speed (m/sec)
0.8
The Trouble with Markers
“You could call something a biomarker of aging if it were documented that those people who show rapid changes in the marker also show rapid changes in most other traits that change with age, and those who show slow changes in the marker also show slow changes in a wide range of other age-sensitive traits”
Richard Miller (University of Michigan)
20 40 60 80 100
100
120
140
160
180
200
Age (yr)
OG
TT
12
0 m
in G
luco
se (
mg
/dL
)
Cohorts (Age at BLSA Study Entry)
20-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
61-70
71-80
80+
Longitudinal Changes in OGTT 120 min GlucoseAccording to Age Group at Study Entry
(BLSA, n=184, Visits=2757)
60 70 80 90 100
-100
-50
0
50
Age (yr)
Per
cen
tag
e C
han
ge
fro
m 6
0 y
ears
Hearing (1/db; 8kHz)
Lower Extr Power (Kg)CrCl (mL/min)Muscle Mass (%)FEV1 (l/sec)(
Hb (g/dL)
WBC (k/mm3)
Creatinine (mg/dL)
Handgrip (kg)
Percent Longitudinal Change of MultiplePhysiological Parameters After Age 60
(BLSA, n=184, Visits=2757)
60 70 80 90 100
-100
-50
0
50
Age (yr)
Per
cen
tag
e C
han
ge
fro
m 6
0 y
ears
Handgrip (kg)
Distribution of Percent Longitudinal Changeof Handgrip After Age 60
(Schematic example)
1/3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. Parameters in “Worst” Tertile of Change
Nu
mb
er o
f S
ub
ject
s
0
10
20
30
40
50
BLSA Participants According to No. of PhysiologicalParameters in the Worst Tertile of Speed Deterioration
(BLSA, n=184, Visits=2757)
Normal Aging Accelerated Aging
60 65 70 75 80 85 90
120
140
160
180
200
Age
OG
TT
12
0 M
inu
tes
Glu
cos
e (m
g/d
L)
Normal Aging
Accelerated Aging
Longitudinal Changes in OGTT in Normaland Accelerated Aging BLSA Participants
(BLSA, n=184, Visits=2757)
60 65 70 75
30
31
32
33
34
35
Age
Res
tin
g M
eta
bo
lic
Rat
e (k
cal/
(m²·
h)
80
Normal Aging
Accelerated Aging
Longitudinal Changes in RMR in Normaland Accelerated Aging BLSA Participants
(BLSA, n=184, Visits=2757)