michael hill
DESCRIPTION
Making the money work: Developing sustainable funding schemes for access and success – A view from England. Michael Hill. Structure of session. The present situation in England (2011 – present) How we arrived (2003 – 2011) The future (2013 - ?) Key issues. Present situation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Michael Hill
The present situation in England (2011 – present)
How we arrived (2003 – 2011)
The future (2013 - ?)
Key issues
Sources of funding specifically aimed at widening access and success include:
HEFCE grants
National Scholarship Programme (NSP)
Access Agreements
£140.4m in 13/14 allocated by student profile to universities to support extra costs of:
Outreach activity to raise aspirations and attainment of under-represented groups
Supporting greater access to HE and improve learning experience of disabled students
Helping students at risk of not completing (as part of teaching enhancement funds)
For new entrants to undergraduate programmes in England
It provides direct financial benefit to individual, eligible students
Each eligible student receives an award of not less than £3,000 This is a one-year benefit.
No more than £1,000 (pro rata) of the overall award is to be provided as a cash bursary
2006 – present Universities must have an Access
Agreement approved by the Office for Fair Access (OFFA) if they are to charge more than the minimum fee
A proportion of the additional fee income must be allocated to safeguard access and retention
Proportion can be between 10% and 30%
For HEFCE: Every university writes and reports on a
Widening Participation Strategic Assessment (WPSA)
For OFFA: Every university (if they charge over £6,000
per annum) reports on the spend and impact of the Access Agreement
HEFCE grant - yes Access Agreement – yes (from 2006) NSP – no
But included specifically funded partnership work :
Aimhigher 2003 – 2011 Lifelong Learning networks 2004 – 2012
HEFCE grant under threat
NSP – finishing in 2015 – replaced by emphasis on postgraduate WP bursaries
Probable reintroduction of regional outreach partnerships – no specific funding – must come from universities
National strategy from 2014 – to bring together single reporting of impact and funding
Access
Admissions
Retention and Success
Sustainability
Access - recognition of different approaches amongst universities◦ For some might be a major part of their
recruitment - for others might be their “contribution” to the national picture. Both need robust means of targeting and evaluating and needs to be efficient for the university and schools
◦ Advantages of partnerships are clear but take time, trust and funding
Admissions
Still a major issue in England:
Use of contextual data – measuring potential
Publicising of bursaries – complex picture
Easier to take the “safe choice”
For many universities retention, attainment of “best degrees” and progression to employment and postgraduate study for WP cohorts is an issue
Example from one English university:Black students 25% less likely than white students to get best degree irrespective of entry qualification
Importance for WP students of engagement, self confidence and belonging
Importance of engaging academic staff and ensuring they take responsibility - increase in subject based pedagogical research
Importance of senior managers ensuring strategies include access, admissions and retention and success and support:
academic staff capacity to deliver
professional staff capacity to deliver
student capacity to deliver
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/wp/
http://www.offa.org.uk/
http://actiononaccess.org/
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/retention/PHF/retention_and_success_change_programme_2012-2015
http://www.f-a-c-e.org.uk/
Michael Hill