MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECOLOGYMINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ECOLOGY

FEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION OF NATURAL RESOURSCES USEFEDERAL SERVICE FOR SUPERVISION OF NATURAL RESOURSCES USE

Waste management in Russian FederationWaste management in Russian Federation

ChiefChief VladimirVladimir VladimirovichVladimirovich KirillovKirillov

Belgium28 October 2010

• Currently, in the territory of the Russian Federation in waste dumps and stockpiles are accumulated more than 94 billion tons of solid waste

• Over the past 5 years the total amount of waste produced in Russia increased by 1.5 times

General situation in waste management

2

Type of waste

54%

17%

12%

16%

extraction of fueland energymineralsnon-ferrous metals

other waste,including utilities

ferrous metal

City Population Volume of waste

(t/year) Volume of SDW

(t/year) Waste paper

(t/year)

Ferrous metal

(t/year) PE

(t/year) LPP+HPP

(t/year)

Base metal

(t/year) Glass

(t/year)

N.Novgorod 1 311 000 307 026 220 336 10 2 625 3 935 4 320 551 10 492

Samara 1 158 100 271 218 271 218 9 269 2319 3 476 3816 487 9 269

Omsk 1 133 900 265 550 190 571 9 075 2 270 3 403 3 737 476 9 075

Rostov 1 070 200 250 632 179 866 8 565 2 143 3 212 3 527 450 8 565

Ufa 1 047 600 245 340 176 067 8 384 2 097 3 144 3 452 440 8 384

Volgograd 1 012 800 237 190 170 218 8 106 2 028 3 040 3 338 426 8 106

Perm 1 100 000 257 611 184 874 8 804 2 202 3 301 3 625 462 8 804

Ykaterinburg 1 293 000 302 810 217311 10 2 589 3 881 4 261 543 10 348

Kaluga 334 750 78 396 56 261 2 679 670 1 005 1 103 141 2 679

Tver 408 900 95 761 68 723 3 273 819 1 227 1 348 172 3 273

Total 10977250 2570285

1844916

87853 21897 32945 36175 4612 87853

Assessment of volumes of MSW and secondary resources for several cities of Russia

3

Note:PE – polyethyleneLPP – Low-pressure polyethyleneHPP – high-pressure polyethylene

Disposal and utilization of MSW

4

7 5

39

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Incinerators Trash recyclingplants

Waste sortingcomplexes

1699

576

5243

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

MSW landfills Industrial wastedisposal facilities

Illegal dumps

The most widely used ways of storing and processing of MSW

1. Pre-sorting

3. Incineratio

n

2. Sanitary dirt fill

5

The main economic benefits of pre-sorting

1. Return of recycled materials in processing due to what saving of natural resources of oil, ferrous and nonferrous metals is made, which are irreplaceable natural resources, and also due to sorting it is possible to reduce the need of cellulose industry in wood raw material that has a direct environmental effect on conservation of forest lands.

2. As a result of the solid waste sorting and reuse of sorting products the volume of solid waste reaching the disposal of waste at landfills decreases, as the major sorted products are waste with long expansions (PE, HPP and other plastics), decrease of landfill reclamation and return of lands allocated for it to the utility take place.

3. Not a few important effect of reducing the volume of solid waste to be disposed of is to reduce the land needed for landfills for disposal of solid waste and allocation of these areas for agricultural use.

6

Sanitary dirt fill

Household waste

Landfill gas

LandfillingBiogas energy

complex

1 tons

100 m3

7

Incineration level of municipal solid waste in some countries

France

Italy

Austria

Germany 20-40%

SwedenBelgium 48-50%

Japan

70%

SwitzerlandDenmark 80%

USAEngland

Russia

2%

10%

Moscow

10%

8

Waste sorting systems in Russia

Tolyatti

Belgorod

Moscow

St. Petersburg

Voronezh

Ufa

Arkhangelsk

Barnaul

9

Assessment of volumes of MSW and extracted secondary resources for several cities of Russia

10

1731

43293

64939

71433

23811

1731

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

Waste paper (t/year)

Ferrous metal (t/year)

PE (t/year)

LPP+HPP

(t/year)

Mix (t/year)

Glass (t/year)

Note:PE – polyethyleneLPP – Low-pressure polyethyleneHPP – high-pressure polyethylene

Forecasted annual gross revenue for some cities in Russia(euro)

11

5 154 822,09

912 833,08

4 590 309,39

5 315 910,29

885 985,05

4 080 900,82

0,00

1 000 000,00

2 000 000,00

3 000 000,00

4 000 000,00

5 000 000,00

6 000 000,00

МС-11 Ferrousmetal

PE LPP+HPP Mix Glass

Note:MC – waste paperPE – polyethyleneLPP – Low-pressure polyethyleneHPP – high-pressure polyethylene

Cost of services for export of solid waste in some regions of Russia (euro)

№ City Rate / person /

month Rate / person /

year Population, person

1 Moscow 0,37 4,42 10 101 500

2 St. Petersburg 0,27 3,25 4 668 400

3 Voronezh 0,18 2,12 848 700

4 Kursk 0,14 1,69 412 600

5 Yaroslavl 0,14 1,72 613 200

6 Ryazan 0,20 2,43 521 700

7 Lipetsk 0,19 2,23 506 000

12

Pilot projects of Rosprirodnadzor in Kemerovo, Belgorod, Kirov and Kaluga Regions

Kemerovo region

Kaluga region

Russian Federation

13

Belgorod

Kirov region

Project purpose

Improvement of slum populated areas of municipalities of the Kemerovo, Belgorod, Kirov and Kaluga Regions

Involvement in recycling of useful components contained in the consumption waste

Creation of a modern system of treatment of consumption waste, including transportation, sorting and

disposal

14

Project task

Modernization of appropriate enterprises of utilities complex in view of the developed

complex system of treatment of consumption waste in population

Establishment of sanitary epidemiological service meeting the current requirements of

the order of operation of landfills for disposal of consumption waste and working

conditions of staff

Organization of design and construction of efficient waste sorting complex providing

deep recycling of consumption waste

15

Source of incomes

Payment by business enterprises for acceptance and disposal of solid

waste

Payment by municipal enterprises of housing and utilities services for acceptance and disposal of solid

waste

Income from sale of sorted

secondary raw materials

16

Project risks

Marketing Technological Legal

• Possible lack of regional municipal rates for acceptance and disposal of solid waste without the appropriate cost-based rates, which may affect the value of sales revenue

• Less than taken in the project percentage of recycled output, which may be related to morphological composition of MSW of the specific regional project

Connected with possibility of increasing expenses and estimated cost of the project relating to implementation of regional projects. At this stage, the risk can be defined as the average because it mainly depends on the expenses connected with the preparatory work and arrangement of land

Connected with possibility of non-license or permit under the competence of regional authorities. This kind of risk can be estimated as low, cause in all pilot regions there are letters of the governors about the readiness of territories to participate in pilot projects

17

Thank you for your attention!

18