muri total ionizing dose effects in silicon technologies and devices hugh barnaby, philippe adell*,...
TRANSCRIPT
MURITotal Ionizing Dose Effects in
Silicon Technologies and Devices
Hugh Barnaby, Philippe Adell*, Jie Chen, Michael Mclain, Ivan Sanchez, Harshit Shah
Arizona State University*Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
Modeling total ionizing dose effects in deep submicron bulk CMOS technologies - Hugh Barnaby, ASU
Band-to-band tunneling (BBT) induced leakage current enhancement in irradiated fully depleted SOI devices - Philippe Adell, JPL
Mechanisms of enhanced radiation-induced degradation due to excess molecular hydrogen in bipolar oxides
- Jie Chen, ASU
MURIModeling Total Ionizing Dose
Effects in Deep Submicron Bulk CMOS technologies
Hugh Barnaby, Michael Mclain, Ivan Sanchez, Harshit Shah
Department of Electrical EngineeringIra A. Fulton School of Engineering
Arizona State University
ASU task
• Characterize and model TID effects in bulk deep submicron CMOS devices
• Design and build radiation-enabled compact models
• Technologies: deep sub-micron bulk CMOS, silicon on insulator, device isolation structures (STI, BOX)
Reliability threats
• Traditional:
Hot-Carrier-Injection (HCI)
• Nanoscale roadblock:
Negative-bias-temperature-instability (NBTI)
• Other issues:
TDDB, etc.
after N. Kimizuka et al., VLSI Tech. 1999
Hot Carrier Limit Region
ITRS Roadmap
250nm
180nm
130nm
NBTI Limit Region
2 3 4 5
Oxide Thickness (nm)
1
2
3
Su
pp
ly V
olt
age
(V)
Radiation threats in bulk CMOS
Radiation damage in shallow trench oxides increases leakage
NMOS 0.16/0.121.0E-12
1.0E-11
1.0E-10
1.0E-09
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
-0.2 0.3 0.8 1.3
Gate Voltage (V)
Dra
in C
urr
en
t (A
)
Increased total dose
Aluminum line Polygate
Polygate
n+ n+n+n+
Aluminum gate
+++ + + + + + + + + + + + +
++
n+ n+ n+n+
Aluminum line Polygate
Polygate
n+ n+n+n+
Aluminum gate
+++ + + + + + + + + + + + +
++
n+ n+ n+n+
Leakage path
VDD0V
1.E-13
1.E-12
1.E-11
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
-10 -2 7 16 24 33 41 50 58 67 75 84 92
FOX Gate Voltage (V)
FO
X D
rain
Cu
rren
t (A
)
Increased total dose
after Faccio et al., TNS 2005
Intra-device leakage Inter-device leakage
TID Defects
Defects
• Not - oxide trapped charge (E’ )• Nit – interface traps (Pb)
Both Nit and Not are related to holesgenerated and/or hydrogen present inoxide
Not, Nit tox
first orderassumption
STI
Gate oxide
halo implants
n+ source n+ drain
p-body
STI
> 300 nm < 3 nm
Trapped charge buildup in STI
Research Goal
To develop a compact modeling approach that cansimulate and predict the effects of stress and radiationdamage of semiconductor devices and circuits?
Research Goal
To develop a compact modeling approach that cansimulate and predict the effects of stress and radiationdamage of semiconductor devices and circuits?
This capability, known as Predictive TechnologyModeling (PTM), has been demonstrated formodeling negative bias temperature instability.
Predictive technologymodeling (PTM)
The goal of PTM is to develop compactmodeling approaches that are:
• Scalable with technology and design parameters• Capable of both short-term and long-term predictions• Compatible with standard circuit simulator• Extendable to emerging reliability and radiation
effects concerns
PTM Approach (for NBTI)
Stress Model
DNit = Ktn + d
Stress ParametersA, E0, EA
Technology Parameters
- material (eX)
- device (fms, tox, Nx)
- other structural features (e.g. trench aspect ratio)
External Conditions
- Bias
- Temperature
- Time Device Layout
- gate geometry (W, L)
Defect Densities
NitCompact Model
Device I-V sim
static, dynamic
Devicecomparison
Experimental DataTransistors
VLSI Circuit Simulation
10 10
Modeling inputs
Model validation path
Circuit simulationwith ageing effects
Model validation
Model verified with published silicon data
Excellent scalability over process and design conditions
0.1 1 100.1
1
DVth (
mV
)
Time (s)
, , ,Eox=9.1, 8.0, 6.9, 5.7MV/cm
Model
102 103 104
10
DVth
(m
V)
Time (s)
Tox=2nm
Tox=3nm
Tox=4nm
Model
180nm, VLSI, 1999
Tox=2.6nm, T=125oCVgs=2.9V, T=100oC
130nm, IRPS, 2003
n=0.25
After Vattikonda et al. DAC 2006.
Research Goal
To develop a compact modeling approach that cansimulate and predict the effects of stress and radiationdamage of semiconductor devices and circuits?
This capability, known as Predictive TechnologyModeling (PTM) has already been demonstrated formodeling negative bias temperature instability at ASU.
Our goal is to extend PTM for reliability to captureradiation effects
PTM Approach (for TID)
Radiation Model
DNot = Dkgfyfottox
DNit = DkgfyfDHfittox - x
Radiation Dose Model Parameters
kg, fDH, fit, fy, fot
Technology Parameters
- material (eX)
- device (fms, tox, Nx)
- other structural features (e.g. trench aspect ratio)
Radiation SourceInput Parameters
- Dose (D), Dose rate (D’)
- Radiation source (e.g Co60)
External Conditions
- Bias
- Temperature
- Packaging
Device Layout
- gate geometry (W, L)
- RHBD design
- Antenna effects
Defect Densities
Not, Nit
Compact Model
- BSIM3/4 - industry standard thru 2006
- Vth modeling approach
- PSP - new industry standard beyond 2006
- surface potential modeling approach
Key Compact Model Parameters
Weff (STI), toxeff (STI), CIT, Vth0 (BSIM), fs (PSP)
Device I-V sim
static, dynamic
Structurecomparison
Experimental DataSpecialized Structures
Technology ComputerAided Design
Devicecomparison
Experimental DataTransistors
VLSI Circuit Simulation
10 10
Modelinginputs
Radiation-enabledcircuit simulation
Radiation-enabled PTM(Physical Module)
Radiation Model
DNot = Dkgfyfottox
DNit = DkgfyfDHfittox - x
Radiation Dose Model Parameters
kg, fDH, fit, fy, fot
Technology Parameters
- material (eX)
- device (fms, tox, Nx)
- other structural features (e.g. trench aspect ratio)
Radiation SourceInput Parameters
- Dose (D), Dose rate (D’)
- Radiation source (e.g Co60)
External Conditions
- Bias
- Temperature
- Packaging
Device Layout
- gate geometry (W, L)
- RHBD design
- Antenna effects
Defect Densities
Not, Nit
Structurecomparison
Experimental DataSpecialized Structures
Technology ComputerAided Design
Model validation
Inputs PhysicalModule
Output(defects)
Closed form model for TID
See Barnaby, MURI presentation 2006
Oxide trapped charge dependence on dose, oxide field and thickness.
Interface trap dependence on dose, oxide field and thickness.
xtεfεfDkxΔN oxotygot
oxitDHygit tffεfDkΔN
Model Parameters
D - total dose [rad]
kg - 8.1 x 1012 [ehp/radcm3]
fy - field dependent hole yield [hole/ehp]
fot - trapping efficiency [trapped hole/hole]
fDH - hole, D’H reaction efficiency [H+/hole]
fit - H+, SiH de-passivation efficiency [interface trap/H+]
tox - oxide thickness [cm]
Models based onassumptions of steady state, uni-directional flux, andno saturation orannealing
Simple Model – Not(x)
STI
++
t ox(i)
NA(i)
x
x(i)
x(i+1)
eox(i)
Vb
Vg
The simple model requires:
1. Doping distribution along sidewall togenerate NA(i) and fMS(i)arrays
2. Field line estimates to generatetox(i) and eox(i) arrays
3. Vgb bias condition
ox
iot
ox
smsgbox
xqN
it
iiVi
fe
Surface potentialE-field a functionof Not (iterative)
… to compute the e-field.
Non-uniform doping
Sidewalldoping
In deep submicron CMOS,the doping along thesidewall is highly non-uniform
TCAD Modeling
1 krad 10 krad 100 krad
TCAD modeling with the Silvaco REM simulator can generate volumetricdistributions of trapped charge in the STI (for model validation).
Not estimates
1 krad
10 krad
100 krad
Vgb = 0V
10krad dose
Vgb = 0V
Vgb = 1V
Simulator predicts dose and bias dependence (as well as temperature,dose rate, etc.).
Radiation-enabled PTM(Compact modeling)
Technology Parameters
- material (eX)
- device (fms, tox, Nx)
- other structural features (e.g. trench aspect ratio)
External Conditions
- Bias
- Temperature
- Time
Device Layout
- gate geometry (W, L)
Compact ModelDevice I-V sim
static, dynamic
Devicecomparison
Experimental DataTransistors
Nit, Notfrom phys.mod.
to phys. mod.
Model validation
to circuit sim.
- RHBD- Packaging
Compact Modeling for TID(surface potential)
Nit, Notfrom phys.mod.
t
s yVyx
A
itsss
ox
scharged
it
ox
otFBsFB
sssFBGs
exN
nyxxyxxQ
xC
yxxqN
xC
xqNxVyxxV
yxxQyxxVVyx
f
f
,
2
2
0
,,,
,,,,
,,,,,
s(x,y)
Surface potential information is used in the PSP compact model being developed and refined at ASU.
Compact Modeling for TID(drain-source leakage)
dxyxdQL
I
dxdyxQL
I
d si
siD
d s
sD
x LxQ
xQ ieff
diff
s
x Lx
x ieff
drift
,
,
0
,
0,,
0
,
0,,
N+ drain
N+ sourcePoly Gate
Poly Gate
Depthof halo
~25 um (MR1)
Depthof D/S diff
~50 um (MR2)
STI
++
+
STI
++
+
MA.D. MR1
MR2
MR2
MR1
Effect of charge buildup along STI sidewall degrades can be modeled as two parasitic nMOSFETs (MR1 and MR2) operating in parallel with as drawn device, MA.D.
D-S leakage model usingBSIM4 compact model
1.E-10
1.E-09
1.E-08
1.E-07
1.E-06
1.E-05
1.E-04
1.E-03
-0.5 -0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9
MA.D.
MR1
MR2
MA.D. MR1 MR2
Parameters in modified BSIM4 model enablesparasitic devices to be modeled
model nfetMR1_10MRAD bsim4 type=n (W=50.1nm L=120nm)+ tnom = 27 toxe = 12.46e-009 toxp = 1.1e-9+ rnoia = 0.577 rnoib = 0.37 vth0 = 0.20439+ cdsc = 0 cdscb = 0 cdscd = 0 cit = -0.00161+ + u0 = 0.026 ua = 1e-10 ub = 4e-16+ ……
Modeling bias dependence withBSIM4
1.0E-11
1.0E-10
1.0E-09
1.0E-08
1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
-0.25 0 0.25 0.5
Id data pre
Id sim pre
Id data T1
Id sim T1
Id data T2
Id sim T2
Id data T3
Id sim T3
Circuit Level Modeling(A/D Converter)
Flash-type ADC
• Compact (C-) models, degradedas function of dose andradiation bias, are used byEDA tools to model circuit degradation over time.
• C-models can be inserted at the circuit-level (SPICE/SPECTRE) or in higher level behavioral models for increased efficiency.
Circuit Level Modeling(results)Modeled application response to intra-device leakage understatic radiation bias conditions
Radiation dose
Input voltage
Output
after Mikkola et al. RADECS 2006