new york state’s teacher/leader quality partnerships (tlqp) program
DESCRIPTION
NEW YORK STATE’S TEACHER/LEADER QUALITY PARTNERSHIPS (TLQP) PROGRAM. May 13, 2004. TLQP BACKGROUND NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001. Signed in January 2002 Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
TLQP BACKGROUNDNO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001
Signed in January 2002Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA)Changes the major Federal programs supporting our schools’ effort to educate their studentsHas strong focus on Measurable Student Outcomes
TLQP BACKGROUNDTITLE II, PART A — USE OF FUNDS
Most go to State Education Agencies, to be distributed to local school districts, using a formula that takes into account the school-age population and the number of children in the district.
Small portion goes to State Agencies for Higher Education (SAHE), to be distributed on a competitive basis through subgrants to partnerships. In New York State, the program distributing these funds is the Teacher/Leader Quality Partnerships (TLQP) Program
TLQP BACKGROUNDTITLE II
OVERALL GOAL:To improve student academic performance
FOCUS IN PART A:Improving student academicperformance by means of improving the quality of teachers & principals
TLQP – IMPORTANT CONCEPTS1. Improved Performance2. Increased Accountability3. Scientifically-based Research4. Uniformity and Collaboration
These underlie and run through thetreatment of
Partners Participants Project Activities
TLQP – PARTNERS
1. Department/division/school of Education – required
2. School/division/department of Arts and Sciences – required
3. High-need Local Education Agency – required
4. Others, as optional partners
TWO “CLARIFICATIONS”
1. The required high-need LEA must be a school district
2. The “equitable participation” requirement from Title IX applies to choice of schools that the project works with in the required high-need LEA
EQUITABLE PARTICIPATION
Participation is equitable if the projects1) assess, address, and evaluate the needs and
progress of public and private school teachers in the same manner,
2) provide the same amount of training to teachers with similar needs,
3) spend an equal amount of money per student for the two groups of teachers, and
4) provide private school teachers an equitable opportunity to participate in program activities.
IMPORTANT RESTRICTIONS WITH THIS REGULATION
1. Non-profit private schools2. Interested private schools3. Only for professional
development4. Look at the needs
of teachers and students
HOW TO DETERMINE INTEREST
1. Contact schools annually2. If schools belong to a central
organization, can contact just that organization, such as the Catholic schools in a diocese.
3. Send “Letter of Interest to Participate,” describing project and asking if interested.
4. Consult with those who are interested.
FUNDS CANNOT BE USED FOR THESE:
Teacher’s salary or benefitsSubstitute teachers
Administrative costs of private schools are not to be included when determining if equal amounts are being spent on a private school teacher or a public school teacher
With private schools, grant funds can be used only for professional development:
1) in pedagogy2) in integrating technology in teaching a core academic
subject3) in teaching methods of improving student behavior or
involving parents more effectively4) in leadership development or management training
for principals5) in core academic subjects6) in training in the use of data and assessments to
improve instruction and students outcomes.
NEEDS OF TEACHERS IN NONPROFIT PRIVATE SCHOOLS
1. Teachers don’t need certification2. Teachers may need pedagogy or
knowledge of core subject3. The need may be measured in
terms of the academic achievement of school’s students
SED HAS THIS INFORMATION ABOUT NEED IN PRIVATE
SCHOOLS:K-8 Schools:
4th and 8th grade ELA and Math scoresNumber of free and reduced lunches
High Schools:Regents Exam Scores
To sum up:
Go where there is the greatest need.Determine need by contacting nonprofit, private schools, consulting with them, and using data from SED and elsewhere;Then integrate these schools into your project if their need is equal to or greater than that of the public schools you are working with in your required high-need LEA partner district.
REAPPLICATION PROCESS
Basic requirements and concepts still hold:
All partners must have a programmatic roleThe teacher education program partner must not be operating under a corrective action plan during the grant year
TLQP-PARTICIPANTS
1. Teachers—inservice and/or preservice
2. Principals—inservice and/or preservice
3. Highly qualified 4. Paraprofessionals
TLQP-PROJECT ACTIVITIES
Required focus on a core academic subject
– English, reading, language arts,– Mathematics, science,– Foreign languages,– Civics and government,– Arts,– History or geography
TLQP-PROJECT ACTIVITIES (cont.)
Optional additional focus– Technology, pedagogical skills, leadership
skills, – Pedagogical skills needed for special groups
of students
Use of “scientifically-based research”Alignment with State Learning Standards, assessment standards, and District Professional Development Plans
TLQP-QUALITIES OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITIES
Strong in academic and pedagogical contentResearch-basedHigh-quality, intensive, and sustainedFocus on classroomAligned with State Standards and District Professional Development Plans
TLQP-QUALITIES OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITIES (cont.)
Includes equity trainingIncludes experience in analyzing disaggregated student achievement dataCreates a learning community
REAPPLICATION FORMAT
Some material before main narrative:CoverProject Profile and Information ChecklistTimeline
Some material after:Budget trio (FS-10, TLQP Budget Form, Budget Narrative)Two attachments
Set of MOAs (photocopies okfor existing partners), with list of names and addresses
Resumes for any new staff members
NARRATIVE
Maximum of 10 double-spaced pagesAbstractActivities/Services
- 10 sub-narratives, one for each performance measure
EvaluationRecruiting & RetentionProject Staffing & Management
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & MEASURES
1. Professional development is intensive, sustained, and ongoing.
2. Professional development serves teachers in highestneed schools and districts.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & MEASURES (cont.)
3. Professional development activities are responsive to teaching and learning needs identified in LEA professional development plans.
4. Professional development activities develop teacher collegiality and expertise.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & MEASURES (cont.)
5. Professional development activities support the development and growth of learning communities focused on improving student achievement.
6. Professional development activities provide opportunities for active learning.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & MEASURES (cont.)
7. Professional development content and/or pedagogical activities are based on scientifically-based research.
8. Professional development content activities are aligned with the NYS Learning Standards.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & MEASURES (cont.)
9. Professional development activities incorporate equity strategies.
10. Partner teacher preparation programs exhibit attributes of effective professional development and effectively prepare teachers for placement and retention in high-need districts.
PROJECT EVALUATION
The formative and summative evaluation tobe incorporated in 2004-2005 activities must include some measurable data onstudent achievement outcomes. Examples:
AttitudeBehaviorAcademic performance during the grant yearLater choicesComparison with others
RECRUITMENT & RETENTION
1. If policies and activities are unchanged, use materials from 2003-08 proposal.
2. If policies and activities have changed, describe the change and explain the reason for it.
Note: “Retention” here refers to a teacher’s remaining in the teaching profession, not remaining in the TLQP program.
PROJECT STAFFING/MANAGEMENT
If unchanged from last year’s proposal, simply say so and include a copy of that section of that proposal. If there are changes, describe andexplain.
Include as an attachment the resumes of any new staff.
PREPARING TO MAIL APPLICATION
Postmarked by July 2, 2004One original and two copiesOriginal indicated by having original signatures—in blue ink
– Signatures by CEO or designee– If designee, include CEO
letter naming that person as designee