nollet, abbé (), lettres sur l’ Électricité, dans

Nollet, Abbé (), Lettres sur l’ Électricité, dans lesquelles on Abattouy, M., Renn, J., Weinig P. (2001), “Transmission as Transformation:
The Translation Movements in the Medieval East and West in a Compara
tive Perspective”, Science in Context, 14: 1–12.
Agassi, J. (1978), “The ideological import of Newton”, Vistas in Astronomy, 22:
419430.
Agostino, S. d’ (1988), “Boscovich’s reception of Newton’s legacy”, in M.
Bossi, P. Tucci (eds.), Bicentennial commemoration of R.G. Boscovich, Edizioni
Unicopli, Milano: 2845.
Agostino, S. d’ (1989), “From Boskovic’s notes on the work of Benedict Stav: A
criticism of one of Newton’s alleged proofs of absolute motion”, Memorie
della Società Astronomica Italiana, 60: 759768.
Agostino, S. d’ (1993), “Boscovich’s Physical Theory of Space and Matter” in
Boscovich, Vita e attività: 4148.
Ahnert, T. (2004), “Newtonianism in early Enlightenment Germany, c. 1720 to
1750: metaphysics and the critique of dogmatic philosophy”, Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 471491.
Albertone, M. (2008), “The idea of Europe in the eighteenth century in history
and historiography”, History of European Ideas, 34: 349–352.
Alexander, A.R. (2001), “Exploration Mathematics: The Rhetoric of Discovery
and the Rise of Infinitesimal Methods”, Configurations, 9: 136.
Alexander, P. (1994), “Solidity and Elasticity in the Seventeenth Century” in
G.A.J. Rogers, Locke’s Philosophy. Content and Context, Oxford, Clarendon
Press: 143164.
Allen, L.D. (1998), Physics, frivolity and “Madame PomponNewton”: The histori
cal reception of the Marquise du Chatelet from 1750 to 1996, Doctoral Disserta
tion, University of Cincinnati [adviser: Jeffrey A. Loveland].
Anstey, P.R. (2002) “Robert Boyle and the heuristic value of mechanism”,
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33: 161–174.
Arthur, R.T.W. (1995), “Newton’s Fluxions and Equably Flowing Time”, Stud
ies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26: 323351.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2
Aston, N. (2004), “From personality to party: the creation and transmission of
Hutchinsonianism, c. 1725–1750”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Sci
ence, 35: 625644.
Attfield, R. (1977), “Clarke, Collins, and Compounds”, Journal of the History of
Philosophy, 15: 4554.
Ayers, M.R. (1994), “The foundations of knowledge and the logic of sub
stance: The structure of Locke’s General Philosophy” in G.A.J. Rogers,
Locke’s Philosophy. Content and Context, Oxford, Clarendon Press: 4973.
Baillon, J.F. (2004), “Early eighteenth century Newtonianism: the Huguenot
contribution”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 533548.
Basalla, G. (1967), “The Spread of Western Science: A threestage model de
scribes the introduction of modern science into any nonEuropean na
tion”, Science, 156: 611622.
Barad, K. (1999), “Agential Realism: Feminist Interventions in Understanding
Scientific Practices”, in Biagioli, 1999: 111.
Barber, W.H. (1979a), “Voltaire and Samuel Clarke”, Studies on Voltaire and the
Eighteenth Century, 179: 4761.
Barber, W.H. (1979b), “ Voltaire et Newton”, Studies on Voltaire and the Eight
eenth Century, 179: 193202.
Barker, P. (1996), “Understanding Change and Continuity” in F.J. Ragep and
S.P. Ragep (eds.), Tradition, transmission, transformation. Proceedings of two
Conferences on PreModern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma, E.J.
Brill, LeidenNew YorkKöln: 527550.
Barker, P. (2006), “New Work in Early Modern Science”, Centaurus, 48: 12
Beaver, D. deB. (1987), “Textbooks of Natural Philosophy: The Beautification
of Technology”, in Berggren and Goldsein, 1987: 203213.
BenZaken, A. (2004), “The heavens of the sky and the heavens of the heart:
the Ottoman cultural context for the introduction of postCopernican as
tronomy”, British Journal for the History of Science, 37: 128.
Berggren, J.L. and Goldsein, B.R. (1987), From Ancient Omens to Statistical Me
chanics, Copenhagen: University Library.
Porter and Teich, 1992: 1154.
Biagioli, M. (1998), “The Scientific Revolution is Undead”, Configurations, 6.2:
141148.
Biagioli, M. (1999a), “Introduction”, in Biagioli, 1999: XIXVIII.
Biagioli, M. (ed.) (1999), The Science Studies Reader, New York and London:
Routledge. [Index.]
Bjelic, D. and Lynch, M. (1994), “Goethe’s ‘Protestant Reformation’ as a Tex
tual Demonstration: Comment on Jackson”, Social Studies of Science, 24:
703724.
and Teich, 1981: 118126.
Bolton, M.B. (1994), “The real Molyneux question and the basis of Locke’s an
swer” in G.A.J. Rogers, Locke’s Philosophy. Content and Context, Oxford,
Clarendon Press: 7599.
Boner, P.J. (2006), “Kepler’s living cosmology: Bridging the celestial and the
terrestrial realms”, Centaurus, 48: 3239.
Bono, J. (1995), The Word of God and the Languages of Man. Interpreting Nature in
Early Modern Science and Medicine, vol: Ficino to Descartes, Madison, Wis
consin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Bono, J.J. (1999), “From Paracelsus to Newton: The Word of God, the Book of
Nature, and the Eclipse of the ‘Emblematic World View’” in Force and
Popkin, 1999: 4576.
Bos, H.J.M. (1980), “Mathematics and rational mechanics”, in Rousseau and
Porter, 1980: 327355.
Bos, H.J.M. (1989), “Tractional motion 16921767. The journey of a mathemati
cal theme from Holland to Italy” in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 207229.
R.J. Boscovich. Vita e attività scientifica. His life and scientific work. Atti del Con
vegno, Roma, 2327 maggio 1988. Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana,
Roma 1993. [Bibliografia generale.] [Indice dei nomi.]
Boswell, T. (1990), “The Brothers James and John Bernoulli on the parallelism
between logic and algebra”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 11: 173184.
Bourdieu, P., (1999/19751), “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the So
cial Conditions of the Progress of Reason”, in Biagioli, 1999: 3150. First
published in Social Science Information, 14: 1947.
Boutin, P. (1996), JeanThéophile Desaguliers. Un Huguenot, philosophe et juriste
en politique, Paris: Honoré Champion.
Bricker, P. and Hughes, R.I.G. (eds.) (1990), Philosophical Perspectives on New
tonian Science, Cambridge, MALondon: The MIT Press.
1 Reprinted with revisions
Brigaglia, A. (1993), “A Comparison of the Relations between Mathematics
and Physics in Boscovich and d’Alembert” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 195
213.
ies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 216: 4850.
Brittan, G.G. (1993), “The Role of the Law of Continuity in Boscovich’s Theory
of Matter” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 215227.
Brockliss, L.W.B. (1992), “The Scientific Revolution in France”, in Porter and
Teich, 1992: 5589.
Brooke, J.H. (2000), “Introduction: The Study of Chemical Textbooks” in A.
Lundgren and B. BensaudeVincent (eds.), Communicating Chemistry. Text
books and Their Audiences, 17891939, Science History Publications, Canton
MA: 118.
BursillHall, P. (1993), “Introduction” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: VIIXXIII.
Burtt, E.A. (1932), The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science. A his
torical and critical essay, second edition (revised), London: Kegan Paul.
Originally published in 1924.
Calinger, R.S. (1968), “The NewtonianWolffian confrontation in the St. Pe
tersburg Academy of Sciences (17251746)”, Journal of World History, 11:
41735.
Calinger, R.S. (1969), “The NewtonianWolffian controversy: 17401759”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, 30: 319330.
Calinger, R.S. (1972), “Response to the Critical Commentary of L. Pearce Wil
liams”, in The Influence of Early Enlightenment Thought upon German Classi
cal Science and Letters. Problems for Future Discussion, Science History Publi
cation, New York: 4546.
Calinger, R.S. (1972), “The German Classical Weltanschauung in the Physical
Sciences”, in The Influence of Early Enlightenment Thought upon German
Classical Science and Letters. Problems for Future Discussion, Science History
Publication, New York: 117.
Calinger, R.S. (1976), “Euler’s ‘Letters to a Princess of Germany’ as an Expres
sion of his Mature Scientific Outlook”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences,
15: 211233.
Calinger, R.S. (1996), “Leonhard Euler: The first St. Petersburg years (1727
1741)”, Historia Mathematica, 23: 121166.
Carriero, J. (1990), “Newton on Space and Time: Comments on J.E. McGuire”,
in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 109133.
Carter, P. (1999), “Gaps in Knowledge: The Geography of Human Reason”, in
Livingstone and Withers, 1999: 295318.
Carver, J.S. (1980), “A Reconsideration of EighteenthCentury Russia’s Con
tributions to European Science”, CanadianAmerican Slavic Studies, 14: 389
405.
Casanovas, J. (1993), “Boscovich’s Early Astronomical Studies at the Collegio
Romano” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 237244.
Casini, P. (1979), “Briarée en miniature: Voltaire et Newton”, Studies on Vol
taire and the Eighteenth Century, 179: 6377.
Casini, P. (1988), “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlighten
ment”, in KingHele and Hall, 1988: 3552.
Casini, P. (1993), “Boscovich and the Hypothesis Terrae Motae” in Boscovich, Vita
e attività: 229235.
Cassirer, E. (1943), “Newton and Leibniz”, The Philosophical Review, 52: 366
391.
Chadwick, O. (1981), “The Italian Enlightenment”, in Porter and Teich, 1981:
90105.
Champion, J.A.I. (1999), “‘Acceptable to inquisitive men’: Some Simonian
Contexts for Newton’s Biblical Criticism, 16801692” in Force and Popkin,
1999: 7796.
570–582.
Clark, W. (1992), “The Scientific Revolution in the German Nations”, in Porter
and Teich, 1992: 5589.
Clark, W. (1997), “German Physics textbooks in the Goethezeit”, History of Sci
ence, 35: 219239 and 295363.
Clark, W. (1997a), “The Death of Metaphysics in Enlightened Prussia”, in
Clark et al., 1997: 423473.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997), The Sciences in Enlightened Europe,
Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997a), “Introduction”, in Clark et al., 1997:
331.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997b), “Bodies and Technologies” [Sub
ject introduction], in Clark et al., 1997: 4147.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997c), “Humans and Natures” [Subject
introduction], in Clark et al., 1997: 167173.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997d), “Provinces and Peripheries” [Sub
ject introduction], in Clark et al., 1997: 305311.
Cohen C. (1997), “Leibniz’s Protogaea: Patronage, Mining, and Evidence for a
History of the Earth” in S. Marchand and E. Lunbeck (eds.), Proof and Per
suasion; Essays on Authority, Objectivity and Evidence, Brepols: 124143.
Cohen, C. and Wakefield, A., “Leibniz’s Protogaea: Practices, Concepts and
Contexts”, a workshop.
Cohen, H.F. (1989), “Galileo’s Ups and Downs in the Historiography of the
Scientific Revolution”, in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 930.
Cohen, I.B. (1972), “Introduction to the Reprint Edition”, in Clarke, 1730: [v]
[xxi].
Cohen, I.B. (1990), “Newton’s Method and Newton’s Style”, in Durham and
Purrington, 1990: 1557.
Corr, C.A. (1975), “Christian Wolff and Leibniz”, Journal of the History of Ideas,
36: 241262.
and Popkin, 1999: 1743.
Crasta, F.M. (1989), “Aspects of Eightenthcentury Cosmology”, Memorie della
Società Astronomica Italiana, 60: 823836.
Crawford, T. H. (1993) “An Interview with Bruno Latour”, Configurations 1.2:
247268.
Crosland, M. (1977), “Presidential Address: History of Science in a National
Context”, British Journal for the History of Science, 10: 95113.
CrowtherHeyck, K. (2003), “Wonderful Secrets of Nature: Natural Knowl
edge and Religious Piety in Reformation Germany”, Isis, 94: 253273.
uljak, Z. (1993), “Boškovi’s unobservables”, International Studies in the Phi
losophy of Science, 7: 211224.
uljak, Z. (1995), “Some aspects of explanation in Boškovi”, International
Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9:7384.
Cunningham, A. and Williams, P. (1993), “Decentring the ‘big picture’: The
Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science”, British Jour
nal for the History of Science, 26: 407432.
Darnton, R. (1968), Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France, Cam
bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daston, L. (1992), “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”, in Biagioli,
1999: 110123. First published in Social Studies of Science, 22: 597618.
Daston, L. (1997), “Afterword: The Ethos of Enlightenment”, in Clark et al.,
1997: 495504.
Daston, L. (1998), “The Nature of Nature in Early Modern Europe”, Configura
tions, 6.2: 149172.
173193.
Dear, P. (2005), “What Is the History of Science the History Of: Early Modern
Roots of the Ideology of Modern Science”, Isis, 96: 390406.
Des Chene, D. (2000), “On Laws and Ends: A Response to Hattab and Menn”,
Perspectives on Science, 8: 144163.
Dhombres, J.G. (1984), “French Textbooks in the Sciences 17501850”, History
of Education, 13: 153161.
Dhombres, J. (1993), “Boscovich aux prises avec le calcul différentiel: art nou
veau des inégalités et pratiques anciennes” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 437
465.
DiSalle, R. (1990), “The ‘Essential Properties’ of Matter, Space, and Time:
Comments on Michael Friedman”, in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 203209.
Ducheyne, S. (2005), “Mathematical Models in Newton’s Principia: A New
View of the ‘Newtonian Style’”, International Studies in the Philosophy of
Science, 19: 119.
Dukes, P. (1981), “The Russian Enlightenment”, in Porter and Teich, 1981:
176191.
Duncan, A.M. (1993), “Boscovich’s Solution to the Problems of the Chemists:
the Newtonian Tradition versus the Autonomy of Chemistry” in
Durham, F. and Purrington, R.D. (1990), Some Truer Method, New York: Co
lumbia University Press.
1999: 165198.
Elkana, Y. (1974), “Scientific and Metaphysical Problems: Euler and Kant”, in
R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, Methodological and Historical Essays in the
Natural and Social Sciences, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v.
XIV, D. Reidel Publishing Company, DordrechHolland / Boston
U.S.A.:277305.
Elkana, Y. (2000), “Rethinking — Not Unthinking — the Enlightenment”, on
Central European University’s web site:
web.ceu.hu/yehuda_rethinking_enlightnment.pdf.
Elliott, P. (2000), “The Birth of Public Science in the English Provinces: Natu
ral Philosophy in Derby, c. 16901760”, Annals of Science, 57: 61100.
Fara P. and Money D. (2004), “Isaac Newton and Augustan AngloLatin po
etry”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 549571.
Feigenbaum L. (1987), “The Center of Oscillation versus the Textbook Writers
of the Early 18th Century”, in Berggren and Goldsein, 1987: 193202.
Feigenbaum, L. (1992), “The Fragmentation of the European Mathematical
Community”, in P.M. Harman and A.E. Shapiro, The investigation of diffi
cult things, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 383397.
Feingold, M. (1993), “A Jesuit among Protestants: Boscovich in England c.
17451820” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 511526.
Fellmann, E.A. (1988), “The Principia and Continental Mathematicians”, in
KingHele and Hall, 1988: 1334.
Ferrone, V. (1995), The Intellectual Roots of the Italian Enlightenment. Newtonian
Science, Religion, and Politics in the Early Eighteenth Century, translated by
Sue Brotherton, New Jersey: Humanities Press. Originally published as
Scienza natura religione: Mondo newtoniano e cultura italiana nel primo Sette
cento in 1982.
Findlen, P. (1995), “Translating the New Science: Women and the Circulation
of Knowledge in Enlightenment Italy”, Configurations, 3.2: 167206.
Findlen, P. (1997), “A Forgotten Newtonian: Women and Science in the Italian
Provinces”, in Clark et al., 1997: 313349.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1993), “Gravity and Intelligibility in Boscovich’s Natural
Philosophy” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 149167.
Forbes, E.G. (1978), “Newton’s science and the Newtonian philosophy”, Vistas
in Astronomy, 22: 413418.
Force, J.E. (1983), “Some eminent Newtonians and providential geophysics at
the turn of the 17th century”, Earth Sciences History, 2: 410.
Force, J.E. (1985), William Whiston, Honest Newtonian, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Force, J.E. (1987), “Science, deism and William Whiston’s ‘third way’”, Ideas
and Production: A Journal in the History of Ideas, 7: 1833.
Force, J.E. (1994), “The God of Abraham and Isaac (Newton)”, in J.E. Force
and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on
Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of
Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht / Boston /
London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 179200.
Force, J.E. (1999), “Newton, the ‘Ancients’ and the ‘Moderns’” in Force and
Popkin, 1999: 237257.
Force, J.E. (2004), “Providence and Newton’s Pantokrator: Natural Law, Mira
cles, and Newtonian Science” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 6592.
Force, J.E and Hutton, S. (2004), Newton and Newtonianism: New Studies, New
York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Force, J.E. and Popkin, R.H. (1999), Newton and Religion. Context, Nature and
Influence, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frängsmyr, T. (1981), “The Enlightenment in Sweden”, in Porter and Teich,
1981: 164175.
Frängsmyr, T. (1990), “The Mathematical Philosophy”, in Frängsmyr et al.,
1990: 2744.
Press.
Franzinetti, G. (2008), “The idea and the reality of Eastern Europe in the
eighteenthcentury”, History of European Ideas, 34: 361–368.
Friedman, M. (1990), “Kant and Newton: Why Gravity is Essential to Matter”,
in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 185202.
Friesen, J. (2006), “Hutchinsonianism and the Newtonian Enlightenment”,
Centaurus,48: 4049.
Fuertes, J.F. and Garcia, J.L. (1995), “Roger Boscovich y su tiempo”, Llull, 18:
6792.
Galison, P. (1999/1997), “Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief”, in
Biagioli, 1999: 136160. First published in idem, Image and Logic, Univ. of
Chicago Press: 781844.
Galison, P. (2004), “Removing Knowledge”, Critical Inquiry, 31: 229243.
Gascoigne, J. (1988), “From Bentley to the Victorians: the Rise and Fall of Brit
ish Newtonian Natural Theology”, Science in context 2: 219256.
Gaukroger, S. (1982), “The Metaphysics of Impenetrability: Euler’s Concep
tion of force”, Brithish Journal for the History of Science, 15: 132154.
Gaukroger, S. (1986), “Philosophical responses to the New Science in Britain,
16441799: A survey of texts”, Metascience: An International Review Journal
for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science, 4: 6071.
Ghins, M. (1996), “L’existence de l’espace et du temps selon Leonhard Euler”,
in J.F. Stoffel (ed.), Le réalisme: Contributions au séminaire d’ histoire des
sciences 19931994, Centre Interfacultaire d’ Étude en Histoire des Sciences,
LouvainlaNeuve: 185193.
Goldish, M. (1994), “Newton on Kabbalah”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin
(eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy,
Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s time and the
British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Aca
demic Publishers: 89103.
Goldish, M. (1998), Judaism in the Theology of sir Isaac Newton, Dordrecht / Bos
ton / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goldish, M. (1999), “Newtons Of the Church: Its Contents and Implication” in
Force and Popkin, 1999: 145164.
Golinski, J. (1986), “Science in the Enlightenment”, History of Science, 24: 411
424. [Review of Hankins’ Science and the Enlightenment]
Golinski, J. (1998), Making Natural Knowledge. Constructivism and the History of
Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gower, B. (1993), “Boscovich on Probabilistic Reasoning and the Combina
tion of Observations” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 263279.
Grant, E. (1987), “Ways to Interpret the Terms ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Aristotelian
ism’ in Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy”, History of Science,
25: 335358.
Grant, E. (2008), “The Fate of Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy In the Mid
dle Ages: Islam and Western Christianity”, The Review of Metaphysics, 61:
503526.
Grmek, M.D. (1993), “Lexplication des phénomènes vitaux dans l’ oeuvre de
Boscovich” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 321336.
Grmek, M.D. (1996), “La méthodologie de Boscovich”, Revue d’histoire des
sciences, 49: 379400.
Guerrini, A. (1985), “James Keill, George Cheyne, and Newtonian physiology,
16901740”, Journal of the History of Biology, 18: 247266.
Guicciardini, N. (1989), The Developments of Newtonian Calculus in Britain 1700
1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guicciardini, N. (1995), “Johann Bernoulli, John Keill and the Inverse Problem
of Central Forces”, Annals of Science, 52: 537575.
Guicciardini, N. (1996), “An episode in the histoy of dynamics: Jakob
Hermann’s proof (17161717) of proposition 1, book 1, of Newton’s Prin
cipia”, Historia Mathematica, 23: 167181.
Guicciardini, N. (2004), “Isaac Newton and the publication of his mathemati
cal manuscripts”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 455470.
Hahn, R. (1990), “The Laplacean View of Calculation”, in Frängsmyr et al.,
1990: 363380.
Hahn, R. (1993), “The Ideological and Institutional Difficulties of a Jesuit Sci
entist in Paris” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 112.
Hall, M.B. (1978), “Newton and his theory of matter in the 18th centrury”,
Vistas in Astronomy, 22: 453459.
Hampson, N. (1981), “The Enlightenment in France”, in Porter and Teich,
1981: 4153.
Hankins, T. (1970), Jean d’Alembert. Science and the Enlightenment, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Hankins, T.L. (1990), “Newton’s Mathematical Way a Century After the Prin
cipia”, in Durham and Purrington, 1990: 89112.
Haraway, D.J. (1988), “Situated Knowledges: The Science in Feminism and
the Priviledge of Partial Perspective”, in Biagioli, 1999: 172188. First pub
lished in Feminist Studies, 14: 575600.
Harkness, D.E. (1999), “Alchemy and Eschatology: Exploring the Connections
between John Dee and Isaak Newton” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 115.
Harman, P.M. (1988), “Newton to Maxwell: The Principia and British Phys
ics”, in KingHele and Hall, 1988: 7596.
Harman, P.M. (1993), “Boscovich and British Natural Philosophy” in
Harré, R. (1980), “Knowledge”, in Rousseau and Porter, 1980: 1154.
Harris, S.J. (1993), “Boscovich, the ‘Boscovich Circle’ and the Revival of the
Jeruit Science” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 527548.
Harris, S.J. (1998), “Introduction: Thinking Locally, Acting Globally”, Configu
rations, 6.2: 131139.
Harrison, P. (1995), “Newtonian science, miracles and the laws of nature”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, 56: 531553.
Harrison, P. (2004), “Was Newton a Voluntarist?” in Force and Hutton, 2004:
3963.
Hart, R. (1999), “On the Problem of Chinese Science”, in Biagioli, 1999: 189
201.
Hattab, H. (2000), “The problem of Secondary Causation in Descartes: A Rre
sponse to Des Chene”, Perspectives on Science, 8: 93118.
Haycock, D. B. (2004), “‘The longlost truth’: Sir Isaac Newton and the New
tonian pursuit of ancient knowledge”, Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science, 35: 605623.
Heard, J. (2007), “Of Apes and Algebraists”, Viewpoint, 83: 13.
Heidarzadeh, T. (2006), “The Reception of Newton’s Theory of Cometary Tail
Formation”, Centaurus, 48: 5065.
Heilbron, J.L. (1980), “Experimental natural philosophy”, in Rousseau and
Porter, 1980: 357387.
Heilbron, J.L. (1990), “Introductory Essay”, in Frängsmyr et al., 1990: 123.
Heimann, P.M. (1977), “Geometry and Nature: Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli’s
Theory of Motion”, Centaurus, 21: 126.
Heimann, P.M. and McGuire J.E. (1971), “Newtonian Forces and Lockean
Powers: Concepts of Matter in EighteenthCentury Thought”, Historical
Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3: 233306.
Hellyer, M.A. (1998), The last of the Aristotelians: The transformation of Jesuit
physics in Germany, 16301773, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cali
fornia, San Diego [adviser: Robert S. Westman].
Henry, J. (1992), “The Scientific Revolution in England”, in Porter and Teich,
1992: 178209.
Henry, J. (1994), “‘Pray Do Not Ascribe that Notion to Me’: God and New
ton’s Gravity”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and
Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criti
cism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time,
Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 123147.
Hill, E. (1961), “Roger Boscovich. A biographical essay” in Whyte, 1961: 17
101.
1730 (Germany), Doctoral Dissertation, University of Virginia [advisers:
H.C. Eric Midelfort and Allan Megill].
Homann, F.A. (1993), “On Boscovich’s De natura et usu infinitorum and Other
Mathematical Works: Translation and Commentary” in Boscovich, Vita e
attività: 407436.
Home, R.W. (1988), “Leonhard Euler’s ‘AntiNewtonianan’ theory of light”,
Annals of Science, 45: 521533.
Hughes, R.I.G. (1990), “Reason and Experiment in Newton’s Opticks: Com
ments on Peter Achinstein”, in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 175184.
Hutton, S. (1994), “More, Newton, and the Language of Biblical Prophecy”, in
J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent
Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Nether
lands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht / Bos
ton / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 3953.
Hutton, S. (1999), “The Seven Trumpets and the Seven Vials: Apocalypticism
and Christology in Newton’s Theological Writings” in Force and Popkin,
1999: 165178.
Hutton, S. (2004), “Emilie du Châtelet’s Institutions de physique as a document
in the history of French Newtonianism”, Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science, 35: 515531.
Hutton, S. (2004a), “Women, Science, and Newtonianism: Emilie du Châtelet
versus Francesco Algarotti” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 183203.
Iliffe, R. (1994), “‘Making a Shew’: Apocalyptic Herneneytics and the Sociol
ogy of Christian Idolatry in the Work of Isaac Newton and Henry More”,
in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Re
cent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Neth
erlands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht /
Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 5588.
Iliffe, R. (1999), “Those ‘Whose Business It Is To Cavill’: Newton’s
AntiCatholicism” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 97119.
Iliffe, R. (2004), “Abstract considerations: disciplines and the incoherence of
Newton’s natural philosophy”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
35: 427454.
Iliffe, R. (2004a), “Digitizing Isaac: The Newton Project and an Electronic Edi
tion of Newton’s Papers” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 2338. Iliffe, R. (2004b), “Prosecuting Athanasius: Protestant Forensics and the Mirrors of
Persecution” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 113-154. Iliffe, R. (2007), Newton: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press: New
York. Iltis, C. (1977), “Madame du Châtelets metaphysics and mechanics”, Studies
in the History and Philosophy of Science, 8: 2948.
Indorato, L., Nastasi, P. (1993), “Boscovich and the Vis Viva Controversy” in
Israel, J. (2006), “Enlightenment! Which Enlightenment?” Journal of the History
of Ideas, 67: 523545.
Ivanovi, D.M. (1993), “On Some Aspects of Boscovich’s Curve” in Boscovich,
Vita e attività: 4957.
Jackson, M.W. (1994), “A spectrum of Belief: Goethe’s ‘Republic’ versus New
tonian ‘Despotism’”, Social Studies of Science, 24: 673701.
Jacob, M.C. (1976), “Millenarianism and Science in the Late Seventeenth Cen
tury”, in Yolton, 1994: 493499. First published in Journal for the History of
Ideas, 37: 335341.
Jacob, M.C. (1977), “Newtonianism and the Origins of the Enlightenment: A
Reassessment”, EighteenthCentury Studies, 11: 125.
Jacob, M.C. (1978), “Newtonian science and the radical Enlightenment”, Vistas
in Astronomy, 22: 545555.
Jacob, M.C. and Sturkenboom, D. (2003), “A Women’s Scientific Society in the
West: The Late EighteenthCentury Assimilation of Science”, Isis, 94: 217
252.
Jacob, M. (2004), “Introduction” in Force and Hutton, 2004: ixxvii.
James, F.A.J.L. (1993), “Reality or Rhetoric? Boscovichianism in Britain: the
Cases of Davy, Herschel and Faraday” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 577585.
James, P.J., (1986), “William Whiston honest Newtonian [book review]”, His
tory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 8:338441.
Kadi, A. (1993), “A Literary and Spiritual Profile of Boscovich” in Boscovich,
Vita e attività: 1325.
Katz, D.S. (1994), “‘Moses’s Principia’: Hutchinsonianism and Newton’s Crit
ics”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture:
Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the
Netherlands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht
/ Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 201211.
Kiernan, C. (1973), The Enlightenment and science in eighteenthcentury France in
Besterman, T. (ed.) Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century, vol. LIXa,
the Voltaire Foundation, Oxfordshire. [Extracts]
KingHele, D.G. and Hall, A.R. (eds.) (1988), Newton’s Principia and its Legacy.
Proceedings of a Royal Society discussion meeting, held on 30 June 1987, Lon
don: The Royal Society.
Klein, J. (1968), Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, translated
by Eva Brann, with an Appendix containing Vieta’s Introduction to the
Analytical Art, translated by the Reverend J. Winfree Smith, Cambridge,
MA and London: The M.I.T. Press. Originally published in 1934 (part I)
and 1936 (part II).
Klein, J. (1985), Lectures and Essays, edited by Robert Williamson and Elliott
Zuckerman, Annapolis, Maryland: St. John’s College Press.
Knoespel, K.J. (1999), “Interpretive Strategies in Newton’s Theologiae gentilis
origines philosophiae” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 179202.
Kochavi, M.Z. (1994), “One Prophet Interprets Another: Sir Isaac Newton and
Daniel”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scrip
ture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in
the Netherlands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time,
Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 105122.
Koyré, A. (1943), “Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth
Century”, The Philosophical Review, 52: 333348.
Kraye, J. (2000), “The Immortality of the Soul in the Renaissance: between
Natural Philosophy and Theology”, Signatures, 1: Ch2.1Ch2.24.
Kubbinga, H.H. (1993), “La théorie de la matière de Boscovich: l’atomisme de
points et le concept d’ ‘individu substanctiel’” in Boscovich, Vita e attività:
281306.
Latour, B. (1992), “One More Turn After the Social Turn”, in Biagioli, 1999:
276289. First published in E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimensions of Sci
ence, Univ. of Notre Dame Press: 272294.
Latour, B. (1993), “Pasteur on Lactic Acid Yeast: A Partial Semiotic Analysis”,
Configurations 1.1: 129146.
Laudan, L.L. (1968), “Introduction”, in Maclaurin, 1968: ixxxv.
Laudan, R. (1993), “Histories of the Sciences and their Uses: A review to
1913”, History of Science, xxxi: 134.
Leshem, A. (2003), Newton on Mathematics and Spiritual Purity, Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Philosophy: Enlightenment Discourses on the Human Condition”, in Liv
ingstone and Withers, 1999: 93119.
Livingstone, D.N. and Withers, C.W.J. (eds.) (1999), Geography and Enlighten
ment, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1991), “The invention of Nature” in idem, Methods and Problems
in Greek Science, Cambridge: 417434.
Lord, F.H. (2000), Piety, politeness, and power: Formation of a Newtonian culture
in New England, 17271779, Doctoral Dissertation, University of New
Hampshire [adviser: Jan Golinski].
Lüthy, C. (2000), “What to Do With SeventeenthCentury Natural Philoso
phy? A Taxonomic Problem”, Perspectives on Science, 8: 164195.
Lynn, M.R. (1997), Enlightenment in the republic of science: The popularization of
natural philosophy in eighteenthcentury Paris, Doctoral Dissertation, The
University of Wiskonsin – Madison [adviser: Domenico Sella].
Maffioli, C.S. & Palm L.C. (1989), Italian Scientists in the Low Countries in the
XVIIth and XVIIIth Centuries, AmsterdamAtlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Maffioli, C.S. & Palm L.C. (1989a), “Introduction”, in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 1
8.
Maluf, R.B. (1985), Jean Antoine Nollet and Experimental Natural Philosophy in
EighteenthCentury France, Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Mandelbrote, S. (1994), “Isaac Newton and Thomas Burnet: Biblical Criticism
and the Crisis of Late SeventeenthCentury England”, in J.E. Force and
R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natu
ral Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s
time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht / Boston / London: Klu
wer Academic Publishers: 149178.
Mandelbrote, S. (2004), “Newton and Newtonianism: an introduction”, Stud
ies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 415425.
Mandelbrote, S. (2004a), “EighteenthCentury Reactions to Newton’s Anti
Trinitarianism” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 93111.
Marchand, J.W. (1972), “The Reception of Science among German Men of Let
ters in the Late Eighteenth Century” in The Influence of Early Enlightenment
Thought upon German Classical Science and Letters. Problems for Future Dis
cussion, Science History Publication, New York: 1926.
Marcialis, M.T. (1989), “Francesco Algarotti’s worldly Newtonianism”, Memo
rie della Società Astronomica Italiana, 60: 807821.
Marcovi, Z. (1961), “Boscovich’s Theoria” in Whyte, 1961: 127152.
Markley, R. (1999), “Newton, Corruption, and the Tradition of Universal His
tory” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 121143.
Martinovi, I. (1993), “Boscovich on the Problem of Generatio Velocitatis: Gene
sis and Methodological Implications” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 5979.
Mazzotti, M. (2004), “Newton for ladies: gentility, gender and radical cul
ture”, British Journal for the History of Science, 37: 119146.
McGuire, J.E. (1990), “Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God’s Space
and Time”, in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 91108.
McMullin, E. (1978), Newton in Matter and Activity, Notre Dame, London: Uni
versity of Notre Dame Press.
Menn, S. (2000), “On Dennis Des Chene’s Physiologia”, Perspectives on Science,
8: 119143.
Mercer, C. (1993), “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelian
ism” in Sorell, T. (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension between
the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz, Oxford,
Clarendon Press: 3367.
Mintzker, Y. (2008), “‘A Word Newly Introduced into Language’: The Ap
pearance and Spread of ‘Social’ in French Enlightened Thought, 1745–
1765”, History of European Ideas, 34: 500–513.
Misa, T.J. and Schot, J. (2005), “Inventing Europe: Technology and the Hidden
Integration of Europe”, History and Technology, 21: 1–19.
Mollenauer, R. (1965), “Introduction” in idem (ed.), Introduction to Modernity.
A Symposium on EighteenthCentury Thought, Austin, Texas, University of
Texas Press: 311.
Montgomery, S.L. (2000), Science in translation: movements of knowledge through
cultures and time, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, K. (1993), “Physics and the Deity: The Ideas of R. Boscovich and J.
Priestley”, Enlightenment and Dissent, 12: 4962.
Munitz, M.K. (1969), “Introduction” in I. Kant, Universal Natural History and
Theory of the Heavens, Ann Arbor Paperbacks, The University of Michigan
Press: vxxiii.
Murrin, M. (1999), “Newton’s Apocalypse” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 203
220.
Newton Project
Nobre, S. (1994), “La contribución de Christian Wolff (16791754) a la popula
rización de las matemáticas en el primera mitad del siglo XVIII”, Mathesis:
Filosofía e Historia de las Matemáticas, 10: 153169.
Novy, L. (1993), “Las matemáticas en la enciclopedia de Diderot y DAlem
bert”, Llull: Boletin de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias, 16: 265
284.
52: 349365.
Osler, M. (2004), “The New Newtonian Scholarship and the Fate of the Scien
tific Revolution” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 113.
Outram D. (1997), “The Enlightenment Our Contemporary”, in Clark et al.,
1997: 3240.
Pagden, A. (1988), “The reception of the ‘New Philosophy’ in eighteenth
century Spain”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 51: 126140.
Pappas, J. (1996), “R.J. Boscovich et l’Académie des sciences de Paris”, Revue
d’histoire des sciences, 49: 401414.
Pater, C. de (1989), “The Textbooks of ’sGravesande and van Musschenbroek
in Italy”, in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 231241.
Pater, C. de (1994), “Willem Jacob ’sGravesande (16881742) and Newton’s
Regulae philosophandi, 1742”, Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the
Early Modern History of Ideas, 21: 257294.
Penha, M.C.D. (1999), “Euler’s ‘Harmony’ beween the principles of ‘Rest’ and
‘Least Action’”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 54: 6786.
Pepe, L. (1993), “Boscovich and the Mathematical Historiography of His Time.
An Unpublished Letter by d’Alembert” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 491
509.
Perl, M.R. (1969), “Physics and Metaphysics in Newton, Leibniz and Clarke”,
in Yolton, 1994: 500519. First published in Journal for the History of Ideas,
30: 507526.
Pfizenmaier, T.C. (1997), The trinitarian theology of Dr. Samuel Clarke (1675
1729), LeidenNew YorkKöln: Brill.
Phemister, P. (1993), “Locke, Sergeant, and Scientific Method” in Sorell, T.
(ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension between the New and Tradi
tional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz, Oxford, Clarendon Press: 231
249.
1940.
son”, in Livingstone and Withers, 1999: 372398.
Pickering, A. (1993), “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the
Sociology of Science”, in Biagioli, 1999: 372393. First published in The
American Journal of Sociology, 99: 559589.
Pole, J.R. (1981), “Enlightenment and the Politics of American Nature”, in Por
ter and Teich, 1981: 192214.
Poni, C. (1993), “The Craftsman and the Good Engineer: Technical Practice
and Theoretical Mechanics in J.T. Desaguliers”, History and Technology, 10:
215232.
Popkin, R.H. (1993), “Scepticism and Modernity” in Sorell, T. (ed.), The Rise of
Modern Philosophy. The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies
from Machiavelli to Leibniz, Oxford, Clarendon Press: 1532.
Porter, R. (1981a), “Preface”, in Porter and Teich, 1981: viiviii.
Popkin, R.H. (2004), “Plans for Publishing Newton’s Religious and Alchemi
cal Manuscripts, 1982–1998” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 1522.
Porter, R. (1981b), “The Enlightenment in England”, in Porter and Teich, 1981:
118.
Porter, R. (1999), “Afterword”, in Livingstone and Withers, 1999: 415431.
Porter, R. and Teich, M. (1981), The Enlightenment in National Context, Cam
bridge: Cambridge University Press. [Further reading.] [Index.]
Porter, R. and Teich, M. (1992), The scientific revolution in national context, New
York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Porter, R. and Teich, M. (1992a), “Introduction”, in Porter and Teich, 1992: 1
10.
Porter, T. (1992), “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science”, in Bi
agioli, 1999: 394405. First published in Social Studies of Science, 22: 633651.
Porter, T.M. (1990), “The Quantification of Uncertainty after 1700: Statistics
Socially Constructed?”, in G.M. Furstenburg (ed.), Acting under uncer
tainty: Multidisciplinary conceptions, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht: 4575.
Principe, L.M. (2004), “Reflections on Newton’s Alchemy in Light of the New
Historiography of Alchemy” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 205219.
Proverbio, E. (1993), “Boscovich’s Project for Verifying Newton’s Theory on
the Nature of Light” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 337362.
Purrington, R.D. and Durham, F. (1990), “Newton’s Legacy”, in Durham and
Purrington, 1990: 113.
Ragep, F.J. (1996), “Introduction” in F.J. Ragep and S.P. Ragep (eds.), Tradi
tion, transmission, transformation. Proceedings of two Conferences on Pre
Modern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma, E.J. Brill, LeidenNew
YorkKöln: xvxxxiv.
Raman, V.V. (1985), “The D’AlembertEuler rivalry”, Mathematical Intelligen
cer, 7: 3541.
Rattansi, P.M. (1981), “Voltaire and the Enlightenment Image of Newton” in
LloydJones, H., Pearl, V. and Worden, B. (eds.), History and Imagination.
Essays in honour of H.R. TrevorRoper, Holmes and Meier, New York: 218
231.
Remmert, V.R. (forthcoming), “Galileo, God and Mathematics”.
Rider, R.E. (1990) “Bibliographical Afterword”, in Frängsmyr et al., 1990: 381
396.
Rider, R.E. (1990), “Measure of Ideas, Rule of Language: Mathematics and
Language in the 18th century”, in Frängsmyr et al., 1990: 113140.
Rider, R.E. (1993), “In a Foreign Language: Boscovich and Algebra” in
Rieber, A.J. (1995), “Politics and Technology in EingteenthCentury Russia”,
Science in Context, 8: 341368.
Roberts, L. (1997), “Going Dutch: Situating Science in the Dutch Enlighten
ment”, in Clark et al., 1997: 350388.
Robin, R.S. (1998), Science for children and the untutored in eighteenthcentury
England (Richard Lovell Edgeworth, Thomas Day, James Ferguson, John New
bery, Francesco Algarotti), Doctoral Dissertation, City University of New
York [adviser: James R. Jacob].
Robinet, A. (1991), “La conquête de la chaire de mathématiques de Padoue
par les leibniziens”, Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et de leur Applications, 44:
181201.
Rogers, G.A.J. (1999), “Newton and the Guaranteeing God” in Force and Pop
kin, 1999: 221235.
Ross, S. (1962), “Scientist: The story of a word”, Annals of Science, 18: 6585.
Roudometof, V. (1998), “From Rum Millet to Greek Nation: Enlightenment,
Secularization, and National Identity in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453
1821”, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 16: 1148.
Rouse, J. (1991), “Philosophy of Science and the persistent narratives of Mod
ernity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 22:141162.
Rousseau, G.S. (1987), “‘Wicked Whiston’ and the Scriblerians: Another An
cientsModern Controversy”, Studies in EighteenthCentury Culture, 17: 17
44.
historiography of EighteenthCentrury Science, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni
versity Press.
Ruderman, D. (1997), “On defining a Jewish Stance toward Newtonianism:
Eliakim ben Abraham Hart’s Wars of the Lord”, Science in Context, 10: 677
692.
Rupke, N. (2000), “Translation studies in the history of science: The example
of ‘Vestiges’”, British Journal for the History of Science, 33: 209222.
Rynasiewicz, R. (1995), “By Their Properties, Causes and Effects: Newtons
Scholium on Time, Space, Place and Motion”, Studies in History and Phi
losophy of Science, 26: 133153 and 295321.
Sabra, A.I. (1996), “The appropriation and subsequent naturalization of Greek
science in medieval Islam: A preliminary statement” in F.J. Ragep and S.P.
Ragep (eds.), Tradition, transmission, transformation. Proceedings of two Con
ferences on PreModern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma, E.J. Brill,
LeidenNew YorkKöln: 127.
Schaffer, S. (1980), “Natural Philosophy”, in Rousseau and Porter, 1980: 5591.
Schaffer, S. (1989), “Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and the Uses of Experi
ment” in D. Gooding, T. Pinch, S. Schaffer (eds.), The Uses of Experiment.
Studies in the natural sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 67
104.
Schaffer, S. (1991), “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour”, Studies in His
tory and Philosophy of Science, 22:174192.
Schama, S. (1981), “The Enlightenment in the Netherlands”, in Porter and
Teich, 1981: 5471.
Schneider, I. (1984), “The role of Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli for the devel
opment of probability theory”, Llull: Boletin de la Sociedad Española de His
toria de las Ciencias, 7: 6989.
Schofield, R.E. (1961), “Boscovich and Priestley’s theory of matter” in Whyte,
1961: 168172.
Schubring, G. (1987), “On the methodology of analysing historical textbooks:
Lacroix as textbook author”, For the learning of mathematics, 7: 4151.
Scott, W.L. (1972), “Introduction” in The Influence of Early Enlightenment
Thought upon German Classical Science and Letters. Problems for Future Dis
cussion, Science History Publication, New York: xixii.
Secord, J.A. (2004), “Knowledge in transit”, Isis, 95: 654672.
Shapin, S. (1980), “Social uses of science”, in Rousseau and Porter, 1980: 93
139.
Shapin, S. (1981), “Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the
LeibnizClarke Disputes”, Isis, 72: 187215.
Smolinski, R. (1999), “The Logic of Millennial Thought: Sir Isaac Newton
Among His Contemporaries” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 259289.
Snobelen, S. (1997), “Caution, conscience, and the Newtonian Reformation:
The public and private heresies of Newton, Clarke, and Whiston”,
Enlightenment and Dissent, 16:151184.
Snobelen, S. D. (2004), “William Whiston, Isaac Newton and the crisis of pub
licity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 473603.
Snobelen, S.D. (2004a), “Lust, Pride, and Ambition: Isaac Newton and the
Devil” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 155181.
Speiser, D. (1996), “The Kepler Problem from Newton to Johann Bernoulli”,
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 50: 103116.
Stewart, L. (1981), “Samuel Clarke, Newtonianism and the Factions of Post
Revolutionary England”, in Yolton, 1994: 52053