nov. 9 eden prairie planning commission agenda

Nov. 9 Eden Prairie Planning Commission AgendaAGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, November 9, 2020 - 7:00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION John Kirk, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed MEMBERS: Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Carole Mette, William
Gooding, Rachel Markos, Lisa Toomey
STAFF MEMBERS: Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources
I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
IV. MINUTES
A. Approval of the Minutes for the October 26, 2020 meeting
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. VARIANCE #2020-03 Location: 18704 Melrose Chase Request for:
• Variance from Shoreland Code to allow impervious surface coverage to exceed the City Code requirements of 30%
VI. PLANNERS’ REPORT
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
7:00 PM—CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road
John Kirk, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Michael DeSanctis, Rachel Markos, Carole Mette, Lisa Toomey, William Gooding
Julie Klima, City Planner
II.
Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – ROLL CALL
Commission members DeSanctis and Mette were absent.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Kirk to approve the agenda. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
IV. MINUTES
MOTION: Markos moved, seconded by Gooding to approve the minutes of October 12, 2020. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TRAIL POINTE RIDGE PUD AMENDMENT Request for:
• Planned Unit Development Amendment on 2.03 acres Cecile Bedor, Executive Vice-President of CommonBond, displayed a PowerPoint and explained the application. She gave an overview of CommonBond and showed the location of the development. Trail Point Ridge would have 58 units, including those with 30 percent, 50 percent, and 60 percent AMI and market rate units. They would have one, two, or three bedrooms and there would be 13 supportive housing units along with a community room,
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 26, 2020 Page 2
outdoor recreational amenities, and offices. She displayed several elevation slides to show these.
Because the architect and the engineer anticipated different space requirements, at issue was the size of the make up air unit, which would take up an entire parking space. This was unfortunately discovered by the architect and the engineer after the initial approval of the development. The fresh air intake location and the grading at that area precluded reorienting this make up air unit, and the cost to move the unit was $35,000.00 to $40,000.00.
The proposed solution would yield 116 stalls: 48 covered, 68 surface. Bedor displayed the location of the extra parking stall. It would cost $10,000.00 to build that stall outside.
Klima presented the staff report. City code was clear when a waiver was granted through the PUD process, and that approved waiver was requested to be altered, that the request required the full review process with a public hearing and City Council approval. Staff recommended approval of the waiver.
Farr asked for and received clarification the dashed line on the site plan that crossed a stall was an easement line involving utilities and causing no problems. Farr noted the dumpster and recycling staging area had concrete pads and asked if there would be indoor trash storage. Klima replied the concrete pads were staging areas utilized only on pickup days. Otherwise, trash would be stored inside.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Markos to close the public hearing. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Toomey to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment on 2.03 acres based on plans stamp-dated October 15, 2020 and the staff report dated October 21, 2020. MOTION CARRIED 7-0.
VII. MEMBERS’ REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Higgins moved, seconded by Gooding to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED 7- 0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
DATE: November 9, 2020
SUBJECT: Variance Request #2020-03
OWNER: Glen Steeves
REQUEST:
• To increase the impervious surface coverage to 47 percent. The maximum permitted by City Code is 30 percent.
BACKGROUND The subject property is currently zoned R1-13.5 and is classified by the Comprehensive Guide Plan as Low Density Residential. The property is surrounded by low density residential and golf course uses. The property shares a driveway with two (2) other parcels, but the majority of the driveway area is located on the 18704 property. The driveway accounts for over half of the impervious surface coverage on the property. The property already exceeds the 30 percent impervious surface coverage required by the City’s shoreland ordinance; currently, the lot has 44 percent impervious surface coverage.
The applicant is requesting a variance from impervious surface coverage to add a pool and small equipment pad to the property. The applicant has offered to install stormwater basins on the property to minimize the adverse impacts of the added impervious surface and the existing impervious surface coverage over the 30 percent allowed by City Code. This is not required by City Code for consideration of variance requests.
VARIANCE REQUEST The applicant is proposing to increase the impervious surface coverage 1,192 square feet, or 3.4 percent, to construct a pool and small equipment pad. The proposed variance requests a 47 percent impervious surface coverage. City Code permits 30 percent impervious surface coverage in the shoreland overlay district.
Staff Report – Variance #2020-03 November 9, 2020 Page 2
EVALUATING VARIANCES AGAINST STATUTORY CRITERIA A variance may be granted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, a variance may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties, as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The proposed request is consistent with the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The variance requested aligns with standards of the Low Density Residential District. Granting the variance does not change residential land use of the property. Likewise, the proposed request aligns with water quality goals outlined in Aspire as the applicant is proposing to treat the run-off from the additional impervious surface onsite.
2. Harmony with the Purpose and Intent of the Ordinance The request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. The owner is treating run-off from the additional impervious surface with stormwater management on the property. Currently, stormwater is conveyed down the driveway to the storm sewer system. Stormwater will be treated onsite under the proposed conditions, which is an improvement from current conditions. The proposed stormwater basins have been designed to retain 1.1-inches of run-off from all impervious surfaces over the 30 percent maximum allowed in City Code, not just the proposed impervious surface addition associated with the pool. This means about 2,993 square feet of impervious surface is proposed to be treated onsite instead of being conveyed to the off- site storm sewer system. Additionally, the requested variance will not alter the existing use of the property as a single-family residence.
3. Unique Circumstance The variance request is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the current landowner. The property is surrounded by a golf course on three (3) sides, which is atypical of most properties in Eden Prairie. The property is surrounded by maintained turf grass and golf cart paths on three sides rather than typical single-family lots that would include houses and driveways. The surrounding open space provides greater opportunity for run-off to infiltrate into the ground and pollutants to be removed rather than go straight to Purgatory Creek or a storm sewer system untreated. At the closest point, the lot is approximately 150 feet from the creek corridor.
The property shares a driveway with two (2) neighboring properties. However, the majority of the driveway is located on the 18704 Melrose Chase parcel. This long, shared driveway adds several thousand square feet of impervious surface to the lot and accounts for about 53 percent of the lot’s total impervious surface coverage. The applicant calculated impervious surface coverage for the lot with and without the driveway. Currently, the lot has 44 percent impervious surface coverage, including the driveway. If the driveway is removed from the lot calculations,
the lot would have about 36 percent impervious surface coverage.
4. Alteration of the Essential Neighborhood Character The variance would not be out of character within the neighborhood. Several other homes in the neighborhood have pools or sports courts that increase the impervious surface coverage.
5. Reasonable Use of Property The current use of the property, a single-family residence, is not proposed to change as part of this application. The land use is a permitted and reasonable use. A pool in a single-family residential district is a permitted and reasonable use of the land.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION The granting of the variance is in harmony with intent and general purposes of the ordinance, and the nature of the variance requested is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan. As part of variances, the City may impose conditions of approval if they are reasonable and proportional to the request. Given the existing high impervious surface coverage of this site, the City recommends conditions be applied to mitigate the proposed impervious surface coverage to maintain site conditions equivalent to the existing conditions.
The owner/applicant has offered to mitigate the site’s impervious surface coverage above the 30 percent maximum allowed in City Code through infiltration basins without prompting by City staff. In proposing this mitigation method, the owner/applicant assumes responsibility for the design of the basins and the site conditions, including suitable soil conditions for the proposed mitigation method. However, MnDNR, who also regulates shoreland, does not accept infiltration basins as an acceptable mitigation method for increased impervious surface coverage with no minimization in impervious surface coverage. Staff recommends approval of the variance with the condition that one or more of the following mitigation practices be implemented in addition to the proposed infiltration basins.
Recommend approval of the following request with conditions: 1. Approve Variance Final Order #2020-03 subject to plans stamp dated October 21, 2020
based on the information outlined in the Planning Department Staff Report dated November 9, 2020. The applicant must apply for a land alteration permit for the project and provide information regarding site soil characteristics at the time of application. The security for the land alteration permit will be waived, but fees will be required. The applicant must also select one or more of the following actions to mitigate the additional impervious surface added with this variance request:
a. Direct run-off from the roof surfaces to the proposed infiltration basins or other stormwater reuse system. The selected system would require approval by the City Engineer.
b. Install a vegetated buffer with an average width of 15 feet around the lot line. c. Convert existing impervious surface on the site with an area equal to the proposed
impervious surface coverage to permeable pavers/pavement as part of the current project or as a result of repairs or modifications to the driveway or patio areas.
The Commission may choose from one of the following actions: 1. Approve Final Order #2020-03 as presented.
2. Approve Final Order #2020-03 with modifications.
3. Continue Variance Request #2020-03 for additional information.
4. Deny Final Order #2020-03.
Location Map: Variance Request #2020-03 Address: 18704 Melrose Chase Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347
BEARPATH TRL
SITE
Location Map: Variance Request #2020-03 Address: 18704 Melrose Chase Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347
BEARPATH TRL
SITE
Transit Oriented Development - Residential
-
D l'Ziil D D D D [Il] D -[Il] - D rz1I D -D D D -- D - D - D -
Zoning Map - Variance Request #2020-03 Address: 18704 Melrose Chase Eden Prairie, MN 55347
BEARPATH TRL
MELROSE CHASE
SITE
City of Eden Prairie Zoning Map Rural TC-C R1-44 One Family- 44,000 sf. min. TC-R R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. TC-MU R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. TOD-E R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. TOD-R Transit Oriented Development - Residential RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A. max. TOD-MU ¯ RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A. max. Industrial Park - 2 Acre Min,
Industrial Park - 5 Acre Min. Up dated through approved Ordinances #26-2008 Airport Office General Industrial - 5 Acre Min. Ordinance #33-2001 (BFI Addition) approved, but not shown on this map edition Office
Date: March 1, 2020 Neighborhood Commercial Public In case of discrepency related to a zoning classification on this zoning map, the Ordinance
Parks and Open Space and attached legal description on file at Eden Prairie City Center will prevail. Community Commercial Highway Commercial Golf Course Airport Commercial Water 0 0.05 0.1
DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctness of the information contained in this map. I t is your responsibility to verify the accuracy of this information. In no event will The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages, including loss of bus iness, lost prof its, business interrupt ion, loss of business information or other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information it contains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie.
Regional Service Commercial Right of Way M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and a ll other land use information\OfficialMaps \OfficialZoning.mxd
Map was Updated/Created: June 11, 2008 Regional Commercial Wetlands Miles
D D -----
------ -D -----
Guide Plan Map: Variance 2020-03 Address: 18704 Melrose Chase Eden Prairie, MN 55347
BEARPATH TRL
S TE I
City of Eden Prairie Land Use Guide Plan Map 2010-2040 Rural Transit-Oriented Development Industrial Low Density Residential Regional Commercial Airport Medium Density Residential Commercial Public / Semi-Public Medium Migh Density Residential Office Parks & Open Space High Density Residential Industrial Flex Tech Golf Course Mixed-Use Flex Service Utility & Railroad ¯ Town Center Eco Innovation Right-of-Way
DATE Approved 10-01-19 DISCLAIMER: The City of Eden Prairie does not warrant the accuracy nor the correctness of the information contained in this map. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracy of this information. In no event w ill The City of Eden Prairie be liable for any damages, including loss of business , lost prof its, business interruption, loss of business information or other pecuniary loss that might arise from the use of this map or the information it contains. Map information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. Any errors or omissions should be reported to The City of Eden Prairie. M:\GIS\Users\Departments\CommDev\Themes\Shapes\Zoning and a ll other land use information\OfficialMaps \OfficialGuidePlan.mxd
Map was Updated/Created: April 18, 2008
340 170 0 340 Feet
VARIANCE #2020-03 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER #2020-03
APPLICANT: Glen Steeves
VARIANCE REQUESTS:
• Variance to increase the impervious surface coverage to 47 percent. The maximum permitted by City Code is 30 percent.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the file therein does hereby find and order as follows:
1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have been met. (Yes No ).
2. Variance #2020-03 is: _____ granted _____ modified _____ denied
3. Findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit A.
4. This order shall be effective fifteen days after the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or on November 24, 2020; however, this variance shall expire one year after the date of the approval unless the applicant has commenced the authorized improvements or use or has received an extension of the time period as provided below.
The applicant may submit a request for a one-time extension of up to one year from the original expiration date. Said extension shall be requested in writing to the City Planner at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the approval. The requested extension shall be reviewed by the City Planner. If the facts and circumstances under which the original variance was granted have not materially changed, the City Planner may approve the extension. If there has been a material change in circumstance since the granting of the variance, the City Planner shall submit the request for review and consideration by the Board.
5. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council Review.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
N/A = Not Applicable BY:________________________________________________ Planning Commission Chair – Andrew Pieper Date: 11-09-2020
EXHIBIT A – FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS VARIANCE #2020-03
FINDINGS
“Practical difficulties” is a legal standard set forth in law that cities must apply when considering applications for variances. It is a three-factor test and applies to all requests for variances. To constitute practical difficulties, all three factors of the test must be satisfied. The three practical difficulties include reasonableness, uniqueness, and maintaining the essential character of the neighborhood. Additionally, the variance must demonstrate harmony with other land use controls.
1. Reasonable use of the property - The first factor is the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner but cannot do so under the rules of the ordinance. The use of the property is not proposed to change as part of this application. The land use is a permitted and reasonable use. The proposed use is consistent and in harmony with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and is a reasonable use of the property.
2. Unique circumstances - The second factor is that the property owner’s situation is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the property owner. In this variance request, the unique circumstance is that the property is surrounded by maintained turf grass and golf cart paths on three sides rather than typical single-family lots that would include houses and driveways. The surrounding open space provides greater opportunity for run-off to infiltrate into the ground and pollutants to be removed rather than go straight to Purgatory Creek or a storm sewer system untreated.
3. Essential character of neighborhood - The third factor is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Under this factor, consider whether the resulting structure will be out of scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent with the surrounding area. The variance would not be out of character within the neighborhood. Several other homes in the neighborhood have pools or sports courts that increase the impervious surface coverage.
The granting of the variance is in harmony with intent and general purposes of the ordinance and the nature of the variance requested is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan.
CONDITIONS: • Subject to the information provided in the Staff Report dated November 9, 2020 and plans
stamp dated October 21, 2020. • The applicant must apply for a land alteration permit for the project and provide
information regarding site soil characteristics at the time of application. The security for the land alteration permit will be waived, but fees will be required. The applicant must also select one or more of the following actions to mitigate the additional impervious surface added with this variance request:
o Direct run-off from the roof surfaces to the proposed infiltration basins or other stormwater reuse system. The selected system would require approval by the City Engineer.
o Install a vegetated buffer with an average width of 15 feet around the lot line. o Convert existing impervious surface on the site with an area equal to the proposed
impervious surface coverage to permeable pavers/pavement as part of the current project or as a result of repairs or modifications to the driveway or patio areas.
EXHIBIT B – VARIANCE REQUEST #2020-03
Legal Description:
Lot 8, Block 1, BEARPATH 5TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Swimming Pool Variance/Stormwater Management Glen Steeves 18704 Melrose Chase Eden Prairie, Mn 55347
To Whom this may concern:
We are proposing to install an 18x36’ swimming pool at our property. Performance Pool and Spa is our contractor and Nik Hawley is our rep. His direct number is 651.592.7869.
It came to our knowledge that our property only allows for a 30% hardcover limit and that our current set up is over that allowable limit. We have a very unique property, where the driveway is shared yet still technically on our property. Being that our driveway drains to the street and is shared, we used the remaining lot square-footage to calculate hardcover and propose an on site mitigation plan. You’ll see that before we add the pool Project, we are 1,801sqft over the allowable limit. As we propose an average size pool with the minimum concrete border, we will add 1,170sqft plus 22sft for the pool equipment pad. This will total 2,993sqft above the allowable limit for our property.
We are proposing adding 2 drainage trenches on the property for storm water mitigation and management on our site. With the average Minnesota rain fall being 1.1 inches we can determine how to not just mitigate the pool project additional hardcover but ALSO mitigate the 1,801sqft of hardcover our property is already over the limit by. This is broken down in the attached variance application proposal. In effect this project will help stormwater management for our property beyond what it is currently set up to handle.
Realizing Eden Prairie is it’s own city, Edina and Plymouth allow this procedure to mitigate overage on hardcover and we hope in our unique situation, we can help mitigate stormwater runoff using this practice on our property.
J
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
~, - :., .....
VACANT
·. NOT!cF. Su:ld:,, ~hdl f; le/ _- I ,e • Vf,r,fv / r o,: ,,, ;_ ),~ c 1 - r e $1/afll!lrl ,... . !:l
, ,. ~~•.v1tr c)nd .. nu riri._,, :a , ._. -•· \V,~htr se1vic . " t . .JY!JJ-">g f ~o!h .. B . o~ ·--R .: -,,,,,,s ,11 ... . · 9 .,. ui/dGr
,.. . • - 1 ' ·•.: ~;>:~.s1hili• , , r · <1.; u/t!l1g in ( , ,·/· • ' ' ~rob/enr~
, .... re lo do " • - 0. '-----
SITE ADDRESS
LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
I hereby certify_ that this ~u:"ey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct superv,s,on and that I om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of tile State of Minr,esolu.
Oa(. '--· 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone:(763) 559-0908 Fox :(763) 559-0479
David [. Crook
_J
58 - ,,
Denotes iron monument Denotes offset stoke Denotes existing elev. Denotes proposed elev. Denotes surface drainage
Proposed garage floor elev. =895.6
Proposed top ui fou ndation elev.=89!:i.95
Proposed /01•,es/ floor e/ev.=886.0
B[NCHMAR/<:: Top of Iron Mar ked "B.M"
Devotion= 88t; .9o
Revised: 7-13-0 7 field verify elevations
per sewer invert MH J 1
File No.
892 3,3 92
lld ai ''890 44
885.51 X Pool Equipment
884 BOW 885.27 (883.50)
23
InfiltrationArea
(883.50)
882
884
886
888
Divided Lot Entire Lot LotArea = 29,507 Sq. Ft. 30 % Allowable - 8,852 Sq. Ft.
House & Garage - 5,067 Sq. Ft.
Driveway - 3,392 Sq. Ft. Patio & Sidewalk = 1,466 Sq. Ft.
Veranda & Steps - 390 Sq. Ft. Porch - 299 Sq. Ft.
Fireplace - 39 Sq. Ft.
OVER 1,801 Sq. Ft.
EquipmentPad - 22 Sq. Ft.
LotArea = 34,970 Sq. Ft. 30 °/o Allowable = 10,491 Sq. Ft.
House & Garage - 5,067 Sq. Ft.
Driveway - 8,095 Sq. Ft. Patio & Sidewalk - 1,466 Sq. Ft.
Veranda & Steps - 390 Sq. Ft. Porch - 299 Sq. Ft.
Fireplace - 39 Sq. Ft.
OVER 4,865 Sq. Ft.
EquipmentPad - 22 Sq. Ft.
OVER 2,993 Sq. Ft. OVER 5,409 Sq. Ft.
2,993 X 1.1 / 12 40.14 %
= 275 Cu. Yds 45.48 %
4
/
X 2 elbakcoL/gnihe cc tan Le -F flem Su /gn ni
m isu ol lN
A c-fe lev Sita /r eo tc ae GD ell da i WT' 890 4 '4
3 4 .7
2 0 .8
X 884 5.06
( 884.00 ) o. e82 s d7 e Xd( P
( 883.50 ) 3E 6 88 ool 885 e l 3. v3 .a 75 t 3io) ( n X
( 883.00 ) 8843 .
23 5
Infiltra tion Area ( 0 3) 88
( 883.50 ) 4 88.00 5 4.( 4) 6I88 n X 4 fil. t5 r 2a0 3 ti) on ( Are88 1
4 .4
8 .0
Grading Plan Veranda 390
HOUSE 5,067
Performance Pool & Spa 2405 Annapolis Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 (651) 775 - 3940 (651) 731 - 8372 Fax 885.51 X
Pool Equipment Attn: Ken Ronsberg
LFE = 886.00 [email protected] 888
Home Owner : Wood Deck
18704 Melrose Chase Sidewalk 887.10 X Eden Prairie, MN 55347
( 603 ) 440 - 8544
Lot - 8 Block - 1 Concrete Patio 888 1,466 Subdivision - 522
Bearpath 5th Add PID 19-116-22-24-0039
Pool Dimensions Width X Length
B itu
m in
o u
Deck ( 26 X 45 ) 5
Proposed Retaining Wall TOW 887.27 BOW 885.27 ( 955.35 ) Denotes Proposed Elevation
X 955.35 Denotes Existing Elevation 886 66.6 60.2
Denotes Drainage Direction 888 5
x x Denotes Silt Fence
CB X 881.40 Scale - 1 Inch = 20 Feet Divided Lot LotArea = 29,507 Sq. Ft. 30 % Allowable = 8,852 Sq. Ft.
City Codes / Setbacks House & Garage = 5,067 Sq. Ft. 882
Driveway = 3,392 Sq. Ft. Patio & Sidewalk = 1,466 Sq. Ft.
Bituminous Path Veranda & Steps = 390 Sq. Ft.
Principal - 5 ' Water
Side - 10 ' Water Porch = 299 Sq. Ft.
Fireplace = 39 10 ' Water Sq. Ft. Rear - Current Coverage = 10,653 Sq. Ft. 5
Equipment - 10 ' Lot Line OVER 1,801 Sq. Ft. 884 Pool & Deck = 1,170 Sq. Ft. Fence - 4 ' Tall EquipmentPad = 22 Sq. Ft. 5 Pool Project = 1,192 Sq. Ft. Septic - 10 ' Water
886 Total Proposed = 11,845 Sq. Ft. Well - 20 ' Water
OVER 2,993 Sq. Ft. 40.14 %
Drainfield - 20 ' Water 2,993 X 1.1 / 12 = 275 Cu. Yds 888 2' X 3' X 45' = 275 Cu. Yds.
888
886
884
mailto:[email protected]
Performance Pool & Spa 2405 Annapolis Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 (651) 775 - 3940 (651) 731 - 8372 Fax Attn: Ken Ronsberg [email protected]
Home Owner: Glen & Alison Steeves
18704 Melrose Chase
( 603 ) 440 - 8544
Lot - 8 Block - 1 Subdivision - Bear ath 5th Add PIO 19-116-22-24-0039
Pool Dimensions Width X Length
Pool ( 18 X 36 )
Deck ( 26 X 45 )
Prepared By : Ken Ronsberg Lay - Out Engineer ( 651 ) 775 - 3940 7/2212018
Pool Project Storm Water Managemen,..:..::t-=-P-=-1a=n~-------
,----------------------~ Lot Area = 30,054 Area in Excess of 30% = 2,993 Sq. Ft. 30 % = 8,852 (2,993 X 1.1" / 12) = 275 Cu. Ft. Filtration Volume Current Coverage = 10,635
Area Over = 1,801 Proposed Mitigation area 3 ' Wide
2' Deep Pool & Deck W/ Equip. Pad = 1,192 45' Long Area Over = 2,993 = 275 Cubic Feet
Area To Be Mitigated = 2,993
GRASS ANO 4" • 6" TOP SOIL
C\I
DATE: November 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting
SUBJECT: Master Redevelopment Project Area
REQUEST: Adopt the resolution finding that the Redevelopment Plan for the Master Redevelopment Project Area conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the city.
Background:
On August 26, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended expanding the City’s Redevelopment Project Area #5 to be coterminous with the City’s corporate boundaries. On September 17, 2020, the City Council and HRA took final action on the item. The intent was to allow pooled Tax Increment Financing dollars to be spent anywhere in the City. However, the action did not alter Redevelopment Project Area #6 which covers the northern portion of the Golden Triangle Area and City West. Therefore, pooled funds from a Tax Increment Financing project in that area cannot currently be spent anywhere in the City except in that project area. This limits potential use of the pooled funding. Therefore, the existing Redevelopment Project Areas are proposed to be combined into one Master Redevelopment Project Area with boundaries that are coterminous with the City’s corporate limits.
Minnesota Statutes Section 469.027 requires the Planning Commission to study and provide a written opinion to the HRA and the City Council on a proposed redevelopment plan .One of the required findings for approval of a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project is that the proposal conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole. Staff finds the proposal consistent with Aspire and the Strategic Plan for Housing & Economic Development in giving the City the most flexibility to implement projects and programs envisioned by those plans. Passage of the attached resolution will serve as documentation of the required finding.
The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be considered for final action at a City Council/HRA public hearing on December 1, 2020.
Attachments:
RESOLUTION NO. PC 2020-01
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MASTER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie (the “HRA”) has proposed to adopt a Redevelopment Plan for the Master Redevelopment Project Area, the boundaries of which are coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Eden Prairie (“City”) (the “Master Redevelopment Plan”);
WHEREAS, the HRA has submitted the Master Redevelopment Plan to the City Planning Commission (the “Commission”) for study and has requested the Commission’s written opinion on the Master Redevelopment Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.027;
WHEREAS, the Master Redevelopment Plan is proposed for the purpose of consolidating Redevelopment Project Area No. 5 and Redevelopment Project Area No. 6 into a single Master Redevelopment Project Area that encompasses the City as a whole, which will further the interests of flexibility and ease of administration of existing and future projects;
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the Master Redevelopment Plan to determine its conformity with the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as described in the comprehensive plan for the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that the Redevelopment Plan for the Master Redevelopment Project Area conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie Planning Commission on November 9, 2020.
Andrew Pieper, Chair
BUILDING COMMUN ITIES. IT' S WHAT WE D O .
13:J in fo@ehlers- inc.com ~ 1 (800) 552 -11 71 Si www.ehlers•inc.com
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MASTER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA
- AND -
MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS
Eden Prairie Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Public Hearing: December 1, 2020
Table of Contents
Section 1: Redevelopment Plan for the Master Redevelopment Project Area ……………………3
Section 1-1: Defintions ........................................................................................................... 3
Section 1-4: Statement of Objectives ..................................................................................... 5
Section 1-5: Payment of Public Costs .................................................................................... 6
Section 1-6: Property Acquisition ........................................................................................... 6
Section 1-7: Environmental Controls; Land use Regulations .................................................. 6
Section 1-8: Park and open Spacce to be Created................................................................. 6
Section 1-9: Property Acquisition and Propopsed Reuse ....................................................... 6
Section 1-10: Boundaries of the Project Area......................................................................... 7
Section 1-11: Adminstration and Maintenance ....................................................................... 7
Section 1-12: Relocation ........................................................................................................ 7
Section 1-13: Amendments .................................................................................................... 7
Section 2-1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 8
Section 2-2: Modification ........................................................................................................ 8
Appendix A: Map of The Master Redevelopment Project Area ............................................... 9
Appendix C: Map of Tax Increment Financing Districts Located within The Master Redevelopment Project Area.................................................................................................10
City of Eden Prairie Redevelopment Plan for the Master Redevelopment Project Area 2
Section 1 – Redevelopment Plan for The Master Redevelopment Project Area
Section 1-1. Definitions
The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which
they are used indicates a different meaning:
"Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie.
"City" means the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, a municipal corporation and political subdivision
of the State of Minnesota.
"City Council" means the City Council of the City.
“Comprehensive Plan” means the documents which contain the objectives, policies, standards
and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation
for all lands and water within the City.
"County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota.
"Governing Body" means the Board of Commissioners of the Authority.
"HRA Act" means the Minnesota Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.001 through 469.047, both inclusive.
"Land Use Regulations" means all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances
and plans relating to or governing the use or development of land in the Project Area, including
but not limited to environmental, platting, zoning and building code laws, regulations and
ordinances.
"Project Area" means the geographic area of the Master Redevelopment Project Area
"Public Costs" means the costs of land acquisition, public and site improvements, repayment of
debt service on tax increment bonds, and other eligible costs as set forth in the Redevelopment
Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan(s).
“Public Improvements” means the public improvements described in the Redevelopment Plan
and Tax Increment Financing Plans.
"Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, all inclusive.
"Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently
established or to be established in the future in the Project Area.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" of “Plans” means the respective tax increment financing plan for
each TIF district located within the Project Area.
Section 1-2. Statutory Authority
The HRA Act authorizes the Authority to exercise all the powers relating to a housing and redevelopment authority granted under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, or other law.
It is the intention of the Governing Body, notwithstanding the enumeration of specific goals and objectives in the Redevelopment Plan, that the Authority shall have and enjoy with respect to the Project Area the full range of powers and duties conferred upon the Authority pursuant to the HRA Act, the TIF Act, municipal housing and redevelopment authority laws, and such other legal authority as the Authority may have or enjoy from time to time.
The following existing redevelopment project areas, which are located within the boundaries of the Project Area, are incorporated into and superseded by the Redevelopment Plan for The Master Redevelopment Project Area:
• Redevelopment Project Area #5
The location of such project areas are identified on the map in Appendix A attached hereto.
Funding of the necessary activities and improvements in the Project Area shall be accomplished through tax increment financing in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, inclusive (the “TIF Act”) or other sources of funds available to the HRA and the City.
Tax increment will continue to be utilized to assist in the financing of Public Improvements.
Within the Project Area, the HRA and the City plan to continue to administer its existing Tax Increment Financing Districts or create one or more new Tax Increment Financing Districts established pursuant to the TIF Act to finance the Public Improvements proposed for the Project Area. The Public Improvements may be initially financed from other City sources, including, but not limited to the issuance bonds which the City may repay from tax increment proceeds derived from Tax Increment Financing Districts to be created with the Project Area.
Tax Increment Districts may be created at such time as will enable the City to capture the increase in taxable value of private improvements to be constructed within the Project Area.
Section 1-3. Statement of and Finding of Public Purpose
The Authority finds that there is a need for redevelopment within the City and the Project Area in order to provide employment and housing opportunities, to improve the local tax base, and to improve the general economy of the City and the State. The economic security of the people in the City depends upon proper development of property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties whose values are too low to pay for the public services required or rendered and properties whose lack of use or improper use has resulted in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health, safety, and welfare. The Authority finds that in many cases such property cannot be developed without public participation and assistance in various forms including property acquisition and/or write-down, proper planning, the financing of development costs associated with clearance, grading and soils
correction, and the making of various other public and private improvements necessary for development. In cases where the development of property cannot be done by private enterprise alone, the Authority believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers, to advance and spend public money, and to provide the means and impetus for such development.
The Authority finds that in certain cases property within the Project Area would or may not be available for development without the specific financial aid to be sought, that the Redevelopment Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise, and that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole.
The Authority further finds that the Project Area is a "redevelopment project" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subd. 14 of the HRA Act.
Section 1-4. Statement of Objectives
The HRA determines that it is necessary, desirable and in the public interest to establish, designate, develop and administer the Redevelopment Plan. The HRA determines that the establishment of the Project Area will provide the City with the ability to achieve certain public purpose objectives not otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without HRA and City intervention in the normal development process. The City seeks to achieve the following program objectives:
1. To promote and secure the prompt development of property within the Project Area, such property which is not now in its most productive use, in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, thus realizing Comprehensive Plan, land use, and tax base goals;
2. Promoting and securing additional employment opportunities within the Project Area and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards and preventing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the City;
3. Securing the increase in value of property subject to taxation by the City, the school districts and the applicable County, and any other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them;
4. Securing the construction and providing of moneys for the payment of the cost of public improvements in the Project Area, which are necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Project Area;
5. To provide funding for an ongoing development strategy and to prioritize the use of available resources;
6. To implement and revise from time to time, as may be deemed necessary or desirable, a consolidated and unified Redevelopment Plan and to finance the associated development costs on an area-wide basis;
7. To employ any of the powers of the Authority for the benefit of the Project Area in such cases and upon such terms as the Authority may deem appropriate, and;
8. To construct or acquire facilities deemed desirable for the development of the Project Area.
Section 1-5. Payment of Public Costs
The preceding objectives will be promoted by providing improvements and opportunities within the Project Area which may include various types of site improvements, land acquisition, redevelopment, demolition, parking, street, sewer, water and other public improvements. It is anticipated that the Public Costs of the Project Area will be paid primarily from tax increments or proceeds of tax increment bonds. Such costs are identified in the TIF Plan(s) for the corresponding TIF District(s) located within the Project Area. The Authority reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such Public Costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, federal or state funds, and investment income.
Section 1-6. Property Acquisition
The Authority may acquire property, or appropriate interest therein, within the Project Area as it deems necessary or desirable to assist in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan.
Section 1-7. Environmental Controls; Land Use Regulations
All Authority actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental controls and all applicable Land Use Regulations.
Section 1-8. Park and Open Space to be Created
Park and open space created within the Project Area will be done so in accordance with the zoning and platting ordinances of the City.
Section 1-9. Property Acquisition and Proposed Reuse
The Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the Authority may acquire property and reconvey the same to another entity. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the Governing Body will require the execution of a binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that tax increments or other funds will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the Authority to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any development agreement to which the Authority is a party.
Section 1-10. Boundaries of the Project Area
The boundaries of the Project Area shall be the coterminous with the boundaries of the City as shown in Appendix A. The existing project areas listed below are within the boundaries of the Project Area are being incorporated into and are superseded by this Redevelopment Plan:
Section 1-11. Administration and Maintenance
Maintenance and operation of the Project Area will be the responsibility of the Community Development Director who shall serve as administrator of the Project Area. Each year the administrator will submit to the Governing Body the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The administrator will administer the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to the provisions of the HRA Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Governing Body. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the above- mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Governing Body.
Section 1-12. Relocation
Any person or business that is displaced as a result of the Redevelopment Plan will be relocated in accordance with the provisions of the HRA Act and other applicable state law.
Section 1-13. Amendments
The Authority reserves the right to alter and amend the Redevelopment Plan subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action.
Section 2 – Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plans for Certain Tax Increment
Districts
Section 2-1. Introduction
The purpose of this modification is to incorporate the existing project areas into The Master Redevelopment Project Area and to provide for the enlargement of the boundaries of the existing project area of each of the Tax Increment Financing Districts (where applicable) listed in Section 2-2 to the boundaries of The Master Redevelopment Project Area.
Subsection 2-2. Modification
The HRA and City are hereby modifying the following Tax Increment Financing Plans for the following Tax Increment Financing Districts to reflect their inclusion into The Master Redevelopment Project Area and to reflect the expansion of the existing project area into the boundaries of The Master Redevelopment Project Area:
• Tax Increment Financing District #12
The following sentence is to be inserted into the Tax Increment Financing Plan for each of the above Tax Increment Financing Districts:
The existing Project Area is being incorporated into The Master Redevelopment Project Area and the boundaries of the existing project areas are being expanded into the boundaries of The Master Redevelopment Project Area, as shown on Appendix B hereto.

t Area #5 Redevelopmen t Project Area
M ster Redevelopmen C New a
Appendix A: Map of The Master Redevelopment Project Area
Appendix B: Map of Tax Increment Financing Districts Located within The Master Redevelopment Project Area
To be added prior to public hearing
City of Eden Prairie Redevelopment Plan for The Master Redevelopment Project Area 10
PLANNERS REPORT
DATE: November 9, 2020
BACKGROUND
Please find attached a draft copy of the proposed 2021 Planning Commission Work Plan. Historically, the Planning Commission meetings have been largely reflective of the project or land use development applications that have been submitted to the City for review. Planning staff is suggesting that the Commission identify issues that will provide further education and support for the Commission as these initiatives continue to advance.
It is staff’s intention to schedule these items for review as time permits when agendas may be light with development applications or as pertinent topics arise. The topics identified are recommendations based on feedback received from Planning Commission members and potential areas of interest.
The work plan is intended to serve as a general guide for Commission discussion. The Commission may wish to revise the work plan to reflect additional or modified topic areas.
ACTION REQUESTED Move to approve the 2021 Work Plan as presented or with modifications.
2021 Planning Commission Work Plan
The Planning Commission typically meets the second and fourth Mondays of the month. The annual schedule is set annually in December.
The City Staff Liaison to the Planning Commission is Julie Klima, City Planner.
Charter Statement To provide for an open process and a balanced review of development proposals and land use requests, both private and public, with regard to the City’s Strategic Plan, Comprehensive Guide Plan, and City land use.
Roles and Responsibilities A. To review and recommend revisions to the Comprehensive Guide Plan as prescribed by
law. B. To conduct public hearings as may be required to gather information necessary for the
drafting of recommendations to the Council concerning requirements of law and as defined in Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code.
C. To provide an opinion on whether specific proposed developments conform to the principles and requirements for the Comprehensive Guide Plan and the City Code provisions.
D. To make recommendations to the Heritage Preservation Commission with respect to the relationship of proposed Heritage Preservation designations to the comprehensive plan of the City, to provide its opinion to the Heritage Preservation Commission as to the effect of proposed designations upon the surrounding neighborhood and any other planning consideration which may be relevant to the proposed designation, and to give its recommendation of approval, rejection or modification of the proposed designation to the Council.
E. To review and recommend on additions to or modifications of park and trail and leisure uses of land.
F. To achieve balanced growth by utilizing the Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Guide Plan to review land development while respecting the natural environment and private property rights.
G. To perform other duties which may be lawfully assigned to it.
Membership Seven to Nine members: Five representatives with experience in the areas of Heritage Preservation, Transportation, Environment, Housing, Leisure Services and two to four at-large members representing a spectrum of interests including Architecture, Land Development, Real Estate, Public Safety, Economic Growth and Landscape Architecture.
Term Lengths/Dates Typically three-year terms, with exceptions as determined by the City Council. Terms start on April 1, terms end on March 31.
Chair and Vice Chair Annually appointed by the City Council
2021 Goals and Work Plan
1st Quarter (January – March 2021) o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) o Aspire implementation strategies o Housing Task Force Recommendations Update
2nd Quarter (April – June 2021) o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) o Electronic Plan Review Training
3rd Quarter (July – September 2021) o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) o Electronic Plan Review Training
4th Quarter (October – December 2021) o Code Amendments to update zoning ordinance and/or to implement Aspire (ongoing) o 2022 Work Plan
The topics identified in the work plan are intended to be reflective of city led initiatives or topic areas that the Commission seeks additional information on to support its roles and responsibilities. These timelines are intended to serve as a general guide and may be adjusted depending upon time availability and priorities. These topics may be added to agendas as allowed by statutory review of project and land use applications.
Time Commitment The time commitment per meeting may vary depending upon the number and complexity of agenda items scheduled. Planning Commission members are expected to review all staff reports and plan materials provided with the agenda packets prior to the scheduled meeting. Planning Commission members are encouraged to contact planning staff prior to the meeting with any additional comments or questions.
2021 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE The meeting dates are the 2nd & 4th Monday’s of each month. Only one meeting in December on the 13th
– which is a regularly scheduled meeting date.
January 11
January 25
February 8
February 22
March 8
March 22
April 12
April 26
May 10
May 24
June 14
June 28
July 12
July 26
August 9
August 23
September 13
September 27
October 11
October 25
November 8
II f------------+-------I I ._____I ________.______I I f----1 ---11
II f------------+-------111'----------------------'I I f----1 ---11
PROJECT PROFILE – NOVEMBER 9, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 9, 2020
1. BOA 2020-03 18704 Melrose Chase by Glen Steeves (SARAH) Proposal to exceed 30% impervious surface coverage to construct a swimming pool
Location: 18704 Melrose Chase Contact: Glen Steeves, 603-440-8544
Request for: • Variance from Shoreland Code to allow impervious surface coverage to exceed the City Code
requirement of 30%
Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 09/29/20 Date Complete 10/21/20 120 Day Deadline 02/18/21 Initial DRC review 10/08/20
Notice to Paper Date 10/20/20 Resident Notice Date 10/21/20 Meeting Date 11/09/20
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 1st Meeting Date 00/00/20 2nd Meeting Date 00/00/20
2. TIF REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT – PLANNERS’ REPORT (JULIE) 3. 2021 WORK PLAN – PLANNERS’ REPORT (JULIE)
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 16, 2020
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020
1. TRAIL POINTE RIDGE PUD AMENDMENT (2020-10) by CB Eden Prairie Limited Partnership (BETH) Proposal to amend the Planned Unit Development regarding parking Location: 16397 Glory Lane
Contact: Cecile Bedor; 651-265-4739
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 1. FLYING CLOUD COMMONS (CASTLE RIDGE RETAIL) (2019-21) by Oppidan Investment Company
(JULIE) Proposal for retail area as Phase 3 of the Castle Ridge redevelopment project Location: 615-635 Prairie Center Drive
Contact: Oppidan Investment Company, 952-294-1259
1
11 111 I I I 11
II t------------+-------111~~1 I t------1 ---11
Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.27 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 7.27 acres • Site Plan Review on 5.479 acres • Preliminary Plat of one outlot into 3 lots and 2 outlots on 7.27 acres
2. CODE AMENDMENT FOR TOWERS AND ANTENNAS by City of Eden Prairie (STEVE) Amend City Code Chapter 11 to comply with recent Federal Communication Commission (FCC) rulings
Contact: Steve Durham, 952-949-8491
Request for: • Amend City Code Chapter 11 to comply with recent FCC rulings
Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 09/08/20 Date Complete N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Initial DRC review N/A
Notice to Paper Date 09/09/20 Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date 09/28/20
Notice to Paper Date 09/30/20 Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date 10/20/20 2nd Meeting Date 11/17/20
3. TILLER CORPORATION PLANT 912 (2019-24) by Tiller Corporation (JULIE) Proposal to relocate the plant processing and stockpile areas within the site Location: 6401 Industrial Drive
Contact: Michael Caron; 763-425-4191
Request for: • Zoning District Change from Public to Industrial on 4.49 acres • Zoning District Change from Rural to Industrial on 1.09 acres • Site Plan Review on 13.21 acres • Preliminary Plat for approval on 13.21 acres
PLANNING COMMISSION – NOVEMBER 23, 2020
2
11 111 I I I 11
11--111~~11-1 -11
IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED
1. CHASE BANK – (2020-12) by Kimley-Horn Proposal to remodel a 3,300 square foot building into a bank with drive thru Location: 928 Prairie Center Drive
Contact:
2. MINOR SUBDIVISION – 13905 Chestnut Drive (2020-07A) by FPA Multifamily, LLC (SARAH) Proposal to subdivide a vacant portion of land from an existing multifamily property Location: 13905 Chestnut Drive
Contact: J.D. Carbone; 832-919-5080
Request for: • Minor Subdivision to subdivide 5.7 acres of land from an existing multifamily property
3. CROSSTOWN CORE INDUSTRIAL CENTER (2020-11) by Sambatek, Inc. (BETH) Proposal to construct a 64,000 square foot speculative industrial building. Location: 10250 Crosstown Circle and 6534 Flying Cloud Drive
Contact: Erik Miller; 763-259-6687
Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.0 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.0 acres • Zoning Change from OFC, RURAL and C-HWY to Industrial on 5.0 acres • Site Plan Review on 5.0 acres • Preliminary Plat of 2 parcels into 1 Lot on 5.0 acres
3
11 111 I I I 11
11 111 I I I 11
4. PIONEER PRESERVE (2020-09) by Metro Development LLC (SARAH) Proposal to build 8 townhome units Location: 9955 Pioneer Trail
Contact: Melanie Emery, 651-248-8457
Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 3.66 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 3.66 acres • Zoning District Change from Rural to RM on 3.66 acres • Site Plan Review on 3.66 acres • Preliminary Plat of 9 lots on 3.66 acres
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/0020
5. TERREY PINE COFFEE (2020-08) by Java Companies (BETH) Proposal to build a drive thru coffee shop with walk- up window and patio seating Location: 16315 Terrey Pine Dr
Contact: Mark Krogh, 612-384-9646
Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 0.511 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 0.511 acres • Zoning Change from Office to HWY-Commercial on 0.511 acres • Site Plan Review on 0.511 acres
Notice to Paper Date 00/00/20 Resident Notice Date 00/00/20 Meeting Date 00/0020
6. CODE AMENDMENT FOR LIGHTING by City of Eden Prairie (SARAH) Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to site lighting
Contact: Sarah Strain, 952-949-8413
Request for: • Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to site lighting
7. CODE AMENDMENT FOR GYMNASIUMS by City of Eden Prairie (BETH) Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to gymnasiums
4
11 111 111 11
Contact: Beth Novak- Krebs, 952-949-8490
Request for: • Amend City Code Chapter 11 relating to gymnasiums
8. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT (2015-23) by SW Metro Transit Commission (JULIE) Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station Contact: Julie Klima, 952-949-8489
Request for: • Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.38 acres • Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 11.38
acres • Site Plan Review on 11.38 acres
VARIANCES
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
1. Costco Building Expansion (2020-08A) by Costco Wholesale Corporation (STEVE) Proposal to expand existing tire center with a building addition of 1,769 square feet Location: 12011 Technology Drive
Contact: Kim Katz; 425-313-8100 or [email protected]
Request for: • Administrative Review – Building addition of 1,769 square feet expanding tire center from 4 to 7
tire bays.
Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 11-04-20 Date Complete 00-00-20 120 Day Deadline 00-00-21 Initial DRC review 11-05-20
Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A
Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A
TELECOMMUNICATION
Contact: Eddie Buell; 612-716-0929 or [email protected]
Request for: • To remove 6 existing antenna and replace with 3 new antenna along with multiple other antenna
equipment upgrades.
Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Meeting Date N/A
Notice to Paper Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 1st Meeting Date N/A 2nd Meeting Date N/A
11.9.2020 Annotated Agenda.pdf
Melrose Chase Staff Report - Final.pdf
FROM: Sarah Strain, Planner I
Melrose Chase Staff Report - Final.pdf
FROM: Sarah Strain, Planner I
11.9.2020 Annotated Agenda.pdf
PC Agenda 11-9-2020.pdf
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TIF REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
B. 2021 WORK PLAN
2020 11 04 - Redevelopment Area PC Memo 2020-11-09 (004) - Clean FINAL.pdf
FROM: Janet Jeremiah, Community Development Director
Project Profile 11-9.pdf

nov. 9 eden prairie planning commission agenda

Documents