nrel's managed wpt experiences and lessons learned · 2019. 4. 17. · wpt location 1 wpt location...

18
HEV TCP Task 26 Workshop 9: Wireless Charging for EVs (6-7 Nov. 2018 in Detroit, Michigan USA) “NREL’s Managed WPT Experiences and Lessons Learned” Presenter Ahmed Mohamed Transportation and Hydrogen Systems Center, NREL.

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • HEV TCP Task 26 Workshop 9: Wireless Charging for EVs (6-7 Nov. 2018 in Detroit, Michigan USA)

    “NREL’s Managed WPT Experiences and Lessons Learned”

    PresenterAhmed Mohamed

    Transportation and Hydrogen Systems Center, NREL.

  • NREL | 2

    Introduction/NREL’s Vision for Demonstrating WPT for EV

    Description of 25 kW WPT system at NREL’s Shuttle

    EMF Testing of On-Vehicle WPT System

    Monitoring and Control of the Wireless Charging

    Description of WPTsim Tool for WPT design

    Design of Greenville AMD Project using WPTsim

    Conclusions/Opportunities

  • NREL | 3

    Dyna

    mic

    WPTQua

    si-dy

    nam

    ic W

    PT Stat

    iona

    ry W

    PT

    vehicle pad

    ground pad

    PPM

    https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/mach/futuristic-roads-may-make-recharging-electric-cars-thing-past-ncna766456

    https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/mach/futuristic-roads-may-make-recharging-electric-cars-thing-past-ncna766456

  • NREL | 4

  • NREL | 5

    Wirelessly Charged Electric Shuttle

    Momentum Dynamics WPT system

    3ϕ ACsupply

    Filter EVbattery

    Primary controller Secondary controller

    Radio munications

    vehicle pad

    ground pad

    PPM

    o Full electric on-demand serviceo 16 passengero 62.1 kWh battery capacityo 100 miles rangeo 7600 curb weight, including VAo 6.6 kW on-board conductive charger

    o 35.5”x35.5”x2.25” (900x900x57 mm) symmetrical square pads

    o 25 kW maximum power transfero 20 (19-21) kHz nominal operating

    frequency.o Automatic alignment capability.o 5”-9.5” (125-240 mm) airgap

  • NREL | 6

    https://www.narda-sts.com/en/http://www.eenewsautomotive.com/news/one-test-system-analysing-electromagnetic-fields-5-hz-60-ghz

    Test Methodology

    1. Define coordinates.

    2. Define a marked safety perimeter.

    3. Identify the worst misalignment condition (X, Y, Z, pitch, roll and yaw).

    4. Define test zones and pointsRegion I: Under the vehicleRegion II: Around and above the vehicleRegion III: Inside the vehicle

    5. Define the standard limits for each zone (2010 ICNIRP)

    Coupler Offset & Gap Max Magnetic Field Max Electric FielddX dY dZ Location B (µT) Location E (V/m)

    +max +max max+max -max max-max +max max-max -max max

    “J2954A (WIP) Wireless Power Transfer for Light-Duty Plug-In/ Electric Vehicles and Alignment Methodology - SAE International.”

    EHP-50D,Narda

    https://www.narda-sts.com/en/http://www.eenewsautomotive.com/news/one-test-system-analysing-electromagnetic-fields-5-hz-60-ghz

  • NREL | 7

    X-axis

    Y-axis

    VA

    X-axis

    Y-axis

    VA

    X-axis

    Y-axis

    VA

    X-axis

    Y-axis

    VA

    X-axis

    Y-axis

    VA

    (a) (b) (c)

    (d) (e)

    EMFs around the vehicle (zone II)

    EMFs before/during alignment (Low Power Excitation)

    Y-axis

    X-axis

    GA

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    × ×

    ×

    × × × × × ×

    Z

    test

    regi

    on

    9"

    9"

    240"shuttle

    20" 20"8.5"

    driver’s seat

    36"

    36"

    76"

    Y-axis

    X-axisVA &GA

    front

    back

    test

    regi

    on

    Z× P1

    6'

    6'

    6'

    6'

    Misalignment Max Brms (µT) Max Erms (V/m)Position I 16.661 1.7414 Position II 18.380 2.4091Position III 17.696 2.5345 Position IV 17.152 1.7147 Position V 18.526 2.0853

  • NREL | 8

    × × × × ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    ×

    × × × bus

    inside

    seat

    VA

    bus outside Y’-axis

    X’-axis

    A

    B

    C

    EMFs inside the vehicle (zone III)

    Test Point Max Brms (µT) Max Erms (V/m)PA 0.0328 0.0633 PB 0.0068 0.0380 PC 1.0362 0.0257

    Magnetic field along X’-axis at a height of 27.25” from the floor of the bus

    Magnetic field along Y’-axis at a height of 6.25” from the floor of the bus

    Driver seat test points Over VA test points

  • NREL | 9

  • NREL | 10

    NREL Intelligent Campus Integrates:

    o RESs

    o ESSs

    o Building loads

    o EVSEs- AC level 2- DC FC (50 kW)- Wireless Charger (25 kW)- Bidirectional EV

  • NREL | 11

    Objective: ‘smart’ integration of wireless charger with surrounding infrastructure on NREL campus (e.g. Renewable Generation, Loads, other EVSEs, etc. )

    Momentum Dynamics Grafana System

    vehicle pad

    ground pad

    PPM

    Charge Control

    SOCVehicle status

    NREL’s campus load

    Charge decision

    SOCVehicle status

    Power transfer

    NREL’s Campus Load

    Block diagram for the data-flow of the wireless charging control

  • NREL | 12

    Cloudy day results: lack of PV generation

    0 5 10 15 203500

    4000

    4500

    PL

    (kW

    )

    load

    limit

    0 5 10 15 20-500

    0

    500

    PL

    (kW

    ) loadlimit

    0 5 10 15 200

    5

    Alig

    n

    0 5 10 15 200

    50

    100

    SOC

    (%) SOC

    Max SOC

    Min SOC

    0 5 10 15 20

    Time (hr)

    0

    1

    2

    sign

    al

    0 5 10 15 20

    2000

    4000

    PL

    (kW

    )

    load

    limit

    0 5 10 15 200

    1000

    2000

    3000

    PL

    (kW

    ) loadlimit

    0 5 10 15 200

    5

    Alig

    n

    0 5 10 15 200

    50

    100

    SO

    C (%

    )

    SOC

    Max SOC

    Min SOC

    0 5 10 15 20

    Time (hr)

    0

    1

    2

    sign

    alNice day results: lots of PV generation

  • NREL | 13

  • NREL | 14

    It is a design optimization tool that incorporates driving data, vehicle data with charging infrastructure parameters (conductive or wireless).

    SpeedPositiongrade

    Driving data

    Vehicle’s data

    BatteryMotorDimensionsetc.

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50

    10

    20

    30

    Spee

    d (m

    ph)

    Type 1

    WPT location 1

    WPT location 2

    WPT location 3

    WPT location 4

    WPT location 5

    WPT location 6

    Type 4

    Type 4

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

    Time (hr)

    -200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    Bat

    tery

    pow

    er (k

    W)

    65

    70

    75

    SOC

    (%)

    Charger’s data

    PowerEfficiency

    Conductive

    Wireless

    PowerEfficiencyPositionsLength

    WPTsim

    Evaluate Fitness- Charge sustaining- Min. Battery capacity- Min. charging infrastructure cost

    Generate variables- Battery capacity- Track positions- Track length- Rated power

    It is capable of providing optimum design of wireless infrastructures (stationary, dynamic and quasi-dynamic) for certain road scenario.

    It is utilized to provide designs for multiple scenarios such as:

    NREL’s circulator shuttle. Greenville AMD Project

    Optimization Search Algorithm

  • NREL | 15

    WPTsim

    LtLr

    Wr Wt

    PnP

    n

    Wr

    S

    d

    d

    Travel direction

    Lane direction

    T1 T2R

    16 passenger, curb weight 3500 kg, 36 kWh battery capacity and about 45 mph maximum speed

    GRT AES

    Phase 0

    Phase 1

    0 1 2 3 4 5 60

    50

    0 1 2 3 4 5 60

    50

    Sp

    eed

    (m

    ph

    )

    0 1 2 3 4 5 60

    50

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Time (hr)

    0

    50

    -82.35 -82.345 -82.34 -82.335 -82.33 -82.325 -82.32 -82.315 -82.31

    Longitude

    34.818

    34.82

    34.822

    34.824

    34.826

    34.828

    34.83

    34.832

    34.834

    34.836

    34.838

    latit

    ude

    AET11

    AET12

    AET13

    AET14

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.50

    20

    40

    Spe

    ed (m

    ph)

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

    Time (hr)

    -100

    0

    100

    Bat

    tery

    pow

    er (k

    W)

    60

    80

    100

    SO

    C (%

    )

    GRT, AET11 with 17 WPT positions (60 kW and 155 m track at each position).

    1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 20

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    Spee

    d (mp

    h)

    1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 2

    Time (hr)

    0

    Batte

    ry po

    wer (

    kW)

    80

    SOC

    (%)

  • NREL | 16

    Parameter Optimal value# wireless chargers 11 out of 17Positions [3 4 5 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 17]Power 80 kWBattery capacity 12 kWh# segments per Track 25 (125-meter track length)

    Optimal driving performance

    Optimal WPT positions

    Optimal key design parameters

    -82.35 -82.345 -82.34 -82.335 -82.33 -82.325 -82.32 -82.315 -82.31

    Longitude

    34.815

    34.82

    34.825

    34.83

    34.835

    34.84

    Latit

    iude

    Map of travel with highlighted WPT segments

    Full Drivecycle

    Segment 1 boundary

    Segment 2 boundary

    Segment 3 boundary

    Segment 4 boundary

    Segment 5 boundary

    Segment 6 boundary

    Segment 7 boundary

    Segment 8 boundary

    Segment 9 boundary

    Segment 10 boundary

    Segment 11 boundary

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.50

    20

    40

    Spee

    d (m

    ph)

    Type 1

    WPT location 1

    WPT location 2

    WPT location 3

    WPT location 4

    WPT location 5

    WPT location 6

    WPT location 7

    WPT location 8

    WPT location 9

    WPT location 10

    WPT location 11

    Type 4

    Type 4

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

    Time (hr)

    -100

    0

    100

    Batte

    ry p

    ower

    (kW

    )

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    SOC

    (%)

    – Optimization Variables:– Position of each wireless charger.– Wireless charger power.– EV’s battery capacity.– Number of track segments (track length).

    – Optimization Objectives:– Minimum battery capacity.– Minimum charging infrastructure cost.– Achieve charge sustaining operation.

  • NREL | 17

    Extra effort is required for demonstrating the WPT technology in real world scenarios starting with closed campus scenarios.

    Collecting data from real-world projects, including NREL’s shuttle one, to be utilized for better understanding the technology, control design and validating design tools.

    Updating and utilizing WPTsim tool for analyzing more complex charge design scenarios (e.g. interstate, urban and rural roads).

    Working to have an EasyMile autonomous shuttle operating at NREL campus with the possibility to install a wireless charger to it.

  • www.nrel.gov

    This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy,LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S.Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Vehicles Technologies Office. The viewsexpressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S.Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S.Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the publishedform of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

    NREL/PR-5400-72805

    NREL's Managed WPT Experiences and Lessons LearnedOutlinesVisions of WPT for EVStationary Wireless Charging: 25 kW Wireless Charger at NREL’s ShuttleWPT on NREL’s CampusEMF Testing for In-Vehicle WPT SystemEMF Test ResultsEMF Test Results

    Wireless Charger Operation: Monitored and ManagedNREL’s Intelligent Campus Energy Management PlanWireless Charging Operation: ControlResults of the Wireless Charging ControlDynamic Wireless Charging: Feasibility Analysis of DWPT for Autonomous Vehicles at AMDsWPTsim Tool: Wireless Charging DesignGreenville Automated Mobility District (AMD):� WPTsim Scenario AnalysisOptimization Results of Greenville AMD

    Conclusion/Opportunities