objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research david r hall kmutt/macquarie 22 april...

25
Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Upload: nigel-douglas

Post on 25-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of

research

David R HallKMUTT/Macquarie

22 April 2011

Page 2: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

It is a fact, an astonishing, almost shocking fact, that Ibsen does exist across cultures, in the sense that his plays are read and performed all over the world. The challenge is how to deal with this fact, both theoretically and analytically.

Page 3: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Reference for previous slide

Helland, Frode. 2009. 'Empire and culture in Ibsen. Some

notes on the dangers and ambiguities of interculturalism‘

Ibsen Studies, 9: 2, 136 — 159

Page 4: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Reference for following slide

Middleton, Peter(2009) 'Strips: Scientific language in poetry', Textual Practice, 23: 6, 947 — 958

Page 5: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

I first became aware of Language Poetry in Duck Soup, Nick Kimberley’s poetry bookshop in London, a small obviously doomed attempt to create the atmosphere of a combined salon, library, and shop after he left the eclectic crowded world of Compendium bookshop in Camden. Nick liked you to sit in the armchair near his desk, drink tea, and bring some conversation and news of writers and London gossip to the overly quiet space. I was always hurrying like the White Rabbit to my next teaching job (I had at least four part-time gigs at the time) and rarely had the money to buy the books I desired and Nick needed to sell.

Page 6: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Reference for following slide

Swellengrebel, N.H. and de Buck, A. 1938.

Malaria in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Scheltema and Holkema

Page 7: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011
Page 8: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Inductive approaches

In an inductive approach to research, the researcher will look for a general explanation based on observed data, but …

Page 9: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

But…

…what is observed and how it is interpreted will be influenced by the researcher’s personal preferences and theoretical preconceptions

Page 10: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Deductive approaches

A deductive approach takes a theory or a hypothesis and tests it by looking for data that either support or disprove it, but …

Page 11: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

But …

both the initial drafting of the theory and the “fitting” of the data to the theory is highly subjective.

Page 12: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Objective & subjective styles

The tendency in the social science literature is now to acknowledge the subjectivity of the researcher and his or her role as both participant and observer in the research process, but this is far from universal in research more generally, and the so-called “agentless” style of research reporting is still dominant.

Page 13: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Kinds of data

• Real-world data• Experimental data• Intuition/theory

Page 14: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Idealisation and abstraction

How are the data idealised in your work?

• Categorisation• Selection• Part-whole relations

Page 15: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University

EducationEarly Childhood

Medicine

Linguistics Psychology

Cognitive Sciences

[Type a quote from the document or the summary of an interesting point. You can position the text box anywhere in the document. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text box.]

Page 16: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Should it be more like this?

EducationEarly

Childhood Medicine

Linguistics

Psychology

Cognitive Sciences

[Type a quote from the document or the summary of an interesting point. You can position the text box anywhere in the document. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text box.]

Page 17: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Or this?

LinguisticsCognitive Sciences

EducationEarly childhood

MedicinePsychology

Page 18: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Or totally scrambled?

L P E M C E a s i y r d o n c g l g h n y i u t I oi u c ve o s o l t di i C S c c c h ii ls g i d e e n c ee s y h a t o i o d n n

Page 19: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Abstraction

Do these exist?

• Love• Friendship• Language• Education• Culture• Research

Page 20: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

How about these?

• Comprehension• Identity• Translation• Autonomy• Communication• Conversation

Page 21: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Keller (1985) on language

“The individual competence of each one of us is his hypothesis of communicating successfully with others ... this hypothesis must be modified continuously through success and failure ... The form in which our language exists is the ability of each individual to communicate with others. ...

Page 22: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

The individual competence of a speaker is, in all likelihood, as unique as the individual himself. ... In addition, the individual competence is constantly in a state of flux. ... Our language exists in no other way than in millions of individual competences. ... That which is social about our language is based on the fact that the individual competence of every single one of us contains hypotheses as to the individual competence of the others”.

Page 23: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

So –

down with nouniness?

Page 24: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

Paradigm blinkers

• Euclid and non-Euclidean geometry• The earth as the centre of the

universe• Einstein and quantum theory• Saussure and linguistic data

Page 25: Objectivity, subjectivity and competing models of research David R Hall KMUTT/Macquarie 22 April 2011

See you in [email protected]