on the economics of climate-proofing infrastructure investment projects presentation by dr. benoit...
TRANSCRIPT
On the Economics of Climate-Proofing Infrastructure Investment Projects
Presentation by Dr. Benoit LaplanteEnvironmental Economist
ConsultantAsian Development Bank
March 12, 2013
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
2
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
3
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
On the meaning of climate-proofing
4
“Climate proofing is a shorthand term for identifying risks to a development project (…), and ensuring that those risks are reduced to acceptable levels through long-lasting and environmentally sound, economically viable, and socially acceptable changes implemented at one or more of the following stages in the project cycle” (ADB, 2005).
The expression “climate proofing” is meant as a process that aims to identify risks that an investment project may face as a result of climate change, and to reduce those risks to levels considered to be acceptable.
It does not imply a complete mitigation of the potential risks of climate change.
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
5
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
Costs of climate change vs. benefits of adaptation
6
Cost and benefits of theproject without climate
change
Cost and benefits of theproject with climate
change
Costs of climate change
Cost and benefits of the project without
adaptation
Cost and benefits of the project
with adaptation
Benefits of adaptation
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
7
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
Climate-proofing investments
Technical Guidelines
Sub-divide the climate-proofing process into 6 sets of activities and 20 steps:
1. Project risk screening and scoping
2. Impact assessment
3. Vulnerability assessment
4. Adaptation assessment
5. Implementation arrangements
6. Monitoring and evaluation
Activities
1 to 6
7, 8, and 9
10, 11 and 12
13 to 16
17 and 18
19 and 20
Steps
8
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
9
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
1. Project risk screening and scoping: How is the proposed project (project characteristics) exposed to the impacts of climate change over its lifespan? What are the climate parameters of most interest to the project? Is sufficient information available to undertake an assessment? Who are the main stakeholders?
Activities Steps
Step 1: Screen the project for exposure to climate change
Step 2: Establish the adaptation objective
Step 3: Survey existing information and knowledge
Step 4: Identify and engage stakeholders
Step 5: Identify methodology and data needs
Step 6: Identify the required expertise
10
Assessing exposure and vulnerability
Activities Steps
2. Exposure assessment: What are the current and historical trends in climate? How is climate projected to change in the future and in what ways? How will this affect natural and human systems of interest? What are the root causes for predicted impacts? What reasonable assumptions (quantitative and qualitative) can be made about climate change and its impacts?
Step 7: Construct climate change scenarios
Step 8: Estimate future biophysical impacts
Step 9: Assign probabilities to identified impacts
11
Assessing exposure and vulnerability
www.cccsn.ca/.../Downscaling_html_m5385e5b8.jpg
Assessing exposure and vulnerability
Many emissions scenarios (SRES)
Many GCMs
Many downscaling approaches
Activities Steps
3. Vulnerability assessment: How have people historically coped with heavy rainfall, floods, landslides, drought, storm surges, and other weather events? Where are the most vulnerable areas? Who are the most vulnerable populations? What climatic conditions are limiting?
Step 10: Identify vulnerabilities
Step 11: Identify biophysical drivers of vulnerabilities
Step 12: Identify socioeconomic drivers of vulnerabilities
13
Assessing exposure and vulnerability
Case study: O MON IV
O MON IV is a combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) thermal power station with a design capacity of 750 megawatt (MW). Under design conditions the plant has a net efficiency of 56.4% and is expected to generate 4,500gigawatt hour (GWh) of electricity per year. Fuel supply will come via pipeline from gas fields in the Gulf of Thailand. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2013 with the plant expected to come online in the fourth quarter of 2015.
The station represents a $778 million dollar investment.
Description:
The O MON IV project is designed for an ambient air temperature of 30°C.
14
Case study: O MON IV
GLOBAL
MEKONG BASIN
MEKONG DELTA
O MON IV PROJECT SITE
Increasing air temp
Changing precipitation
Increasing flooding
Increasing water temp
Increasing erosion
Exposure Impact Vulnerability
Climate change: Exposure – Impact - Vulnerability
15
Case study: O MON IV
Direct climate threat Potential sensitivity of a Power plantAir temperature Gas turbine cycle performanceRiver water temperature Steam turbine cycle + coolant water cycle
performanceDirect precipitation Performance of gravity-driven stormwater
managementFlood depth + Duration Asset damage + plant downtimeErosion Asset damage
16
Case study: O MON IV
Direct climate threat Potential sensitivity of a Power plantAir temperature Gas turbine cycle performanceRiver water temperature Steam turbine cycle + coolant water cycle
performanceDirect precipitation Performance of gravity-driven stormwater
managementFlood depth + Duration Asset damage + plant downtimeErosion Asset damage
17
Case study: O MON IV
Comparison of Baseline with GCM Projections in the Mekong Delta: Average Monthly Temperature
18
Case study: O MON IV
Comparison of Baseline with GCM Projections in the Mekong Delta: Total Monthly Precipitation
19
Case study: O MON IV
Frequency Distribution Curves of Daily Temperatures under Baseline and A2 Climate Change Scenarios
Frequency Distribution Curves of Daily and max
Temperatures
Change in Plant Power Output with Air Temperature
20
Case study: O MON IV
Frequency Distribution Curves of Average Daily River Water Temperatures
Relative Efficiency and Energy Output as a Function of River Water Temperature
21
Case study: O MON IV
Over the life-cycle of the plant, the combined impacts of climate change could reduce power output by approximately 827.5GWh over the 25 year economic design life with effects more severe in later phases of project operations. Over the design life of the plant this represents a loss in power output of 0.8 %.
At a nominal electricity purchase price of 6.78 cent/kW, the combined loss in power output would amount to a reduction in 2040 revenue in the order of USD 6.73 million. Using a 12% discount rate, the present value of cumulative lost revenues over the period 2015-2040 amounts to $9.36 million. If power loss were to follow a linear trend between 2015 and the estimated end value in 2040, then the present value of lost revenues reaches $18.79 million.
22
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
23
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
Activities Steps
4. Adaptation assessment: What adaptation solutions are technically feasible to address projected climate vulnerabilities? What are the costs and benefits of these options? What are the preferred options in the context of the project?
Step 13: Identify all potential adaptation options
Step 14: Conduct consultations
Step 15: Conduct economic analysis
Step 16: Prioritize and select adaptation option(s)
24
On the economics of climate proofing
Required adaptation
Efficient adaptation
ADAPTATION
When adaptation responds to
complying with codes and standards
Cost-effectiveness analysis
On the economics of climate proofing
MRC:Minimum navigational clearance of 37.5 mfor the P05 (5%) annual flood.
Required adaptation
Efficient adaptation
ADAPTATION
When adaptation is a choice
When adaptation responds to
complying with codes and standards
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-benefit analysis
On the economics of climate proofing
Changes in the Net Present Value of the Project as a Result of Climate Change
ΔNPV(P) > 0 ΔNPV(P) < 0
Keep project in portfolio
Economic analysis of project-level climate-proofing options
NPV(CP) > 0 NPV(CP) < 0
NPV(P) < 0 NPV(P) > 0 NPV(P) < 0NPV(P) > 0
Remove project from
project portfolio
Keep project in portfolio
without adaptation
Remove project from
project portfolio
Keep project in portfolio
with adaptation
Corollary: The fact that an infrastructure is projected to be adversely impacted by climate change does not necessarily imply that adaptation options must be implemented.
On the economics of climate proofing
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
28
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
A menu of climate-proofing decisions:
A1:Invest
now
A2:Be ready and invest
later if needed
A3:Do nothing and invest
later if needed
Types of decisions
A Type 1 decision may be appropriate where: •costs of climate-proofing now are relatively small while the expected benefits are estimated to be very large (a low-regret approach), and/or
•costs of climate-proofing at a later point are expected to be prohibitive, or climate-proofing at a later point in time is technically not possible (e.g., raising bridge deck); and/or
•among climate-proofing options there exist options which deliver net positive economic benefits regardless of the nature and extent of climate change, including the current climate conditions (a no-regret approach); and/or
•the set of climate-proofing options includes options which not only reduce project climate risks, but also have other social, environmental or economic benefits. Co-benefits (if any) should be included in the economic assessment of adaptation options.
Types of decisions
A Type 2 decision may be appropriate where: •No climate-proofing investment is needed now, but the project can be designed to accommodate climate-proofing in the future if and when circumstances indicate this to be a better option than not climate-proofing.
•Type 2 decisions aim to ensure that a project is climate ready.
Types of decisions
A Type 3 decision may be appropriate where: •costs of climate-proofing now are estimated to be large relative to the expected benefits; and/or
•costs (in present value terms) of climate-proofing (e.g. retro-fitting) at a later point in time are expected to be no larger than climate-proofing now; and/or
•expected benefits of climate-proofing are estimated to be relatively small.
Both Type 2 and Type 3 decisions may be referred as adaptive management, consisting of putting in place incremental adaptation options over the project’s lifetime.
Types of decisions
A menu of climate-proofing decisions:
A1:Invest
now
A2:Be ready and invest
later if needed
A3:Do nothing and invest
later if needed
Bridge in Bangladesh
Khulna Water Supply
Sea dykes in Viet Nam
O MON IV
Most others?
33
Types of decisions
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
34
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
There is no need to adapt cost-benefit analysis to climate change. The general framework of analysis works just fine.
Thought 1
However, there is a need to do better cost-benefit analysis.
“Cost-benefit analysis is conducted after the decision to go ahead with the project has been made, which puts the analysis under considerable pressure to reach conclusions consistent with the decisions already taken.” World Bank. 2010. Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects.
The greatest difficulty in conducting an economic analysis of a climate-proofing investment is not with the economics.
The greatest difficulty is with the identification of projected changes in climate variables, and then of the physical impacts of these changes on infrastructure. Once these impacts are quantitatively identified, the economic analysis of climate-proofing investment is relatively straightforward.
Thought 2
As is ALWAYS the case, the economic analysis of an investment project is a multi-disciplinary exercise which requires the inputs of multiple experts and which is conducted in a context of uncertainty.
The type of (simplistic) sensitivity analysis typically conducted in an economic analysis is inappropriate to deal with the uncertainty associated with climate change.
Thought 3
There is a need to be considerably more sophisticated with the conduct of economic analysis (e.g. Monte Carlo simulation) to estimate not only the expected NPV of a project but to estimate the probability distribution of that NPV, and assess the risk (the probability) and circumstances under which the project NPV may be negative.
We should not confuse the economics of climate-proofing with the financing of climate-proofing.
Thought 4
Economics of climate-proofing: Is it good for society to invest in climate-proofing?
Financing of climate-proofing: If it is good for society, then where will the money come from?
There is a great temptation to increase the capital costs of infrastructure projects to account for climate change by some standardized “climate change adaptation coefficients” (for example, 10%).
Thought 5
This temptation should be avoided. Adaptation options and costs are specific to local circumstances and technologies.
International financial institutions require that specific discount rates be used to calculate the present value of costs and benefits. Given the required level of these discount rates (World Bank requires the use of 10%; ADB requires the use of 12%), climate change may not really matter (unless the impacts are very large and expected relatively soon).
Thought 6
3.3 Types of decisions
4. Some thoughts on the nature of the economics of climate proofing investment projects
Outline of Presentation
3.1 Assessing exposure and vulnerability
3.2 On the economics of climate- proofing
41
5. Further resources
1. On the meaning of “climate-proofing”
3. Climate-proofing investments
2. Costs of climate change vs. benefits of climate-proofing
All reports available at:
http://www.adb.org/climate-change
For more information, please contact Mr. Charles Rodgers:
Further Information
On the Economics of Climate-Proofing Infrastructure Investment Projects
Presentation by Dr. Benoit LaplanteEnvironmental Economist
ConsultantAsian Development Bank
March 12, 2013