original - supreme court of the united states · 3/21/1972  · 4 the united ri·nte':l...

55
ORIGINAL In the ~upreme <!ourt of tbe Wnitell ~tateli DONALD L, BROOKS, Petitioner, ••• TENNESSEE, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) lb, 71~5313 Washington, D. c. March 21 & 22, 1972 Pages l thru 54 Duplication or copying of lhia transcript by photographic, electrostatic or other facsimile means is prohibited under the order form asr<>ement. HOOVER REPORTING COMPANY, INC. 0/]u:i<ll '1{_,porms w.,hiogtoo, 0. C. 546.6666 - ~ ., C <

Upload: others

Post on 23-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

ORIGINAL In the

~upreme <!ourt of tbe Wnitell ~tateli

DONALD L, BROOKS,

Petitioner,

••• TENNESSEE,

Respondent.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

lb, 71~5313

Washington, D. c. March 21 & 22, 1972

Pages l thru 54

Duplication or copying of lhia transcript by photographic, electrostatic or other facsimile means is prohibited under the

order form asr<>ement.

HOOVER REPORTING COMPANY, INC. 0/]u:i<ll '1{_,porms

w.,hiogtoo, 0. C. 546.6666

• -~

., C

<

Page 2: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

p

I:-1 1'l1f': SfJPMlli: COtJ"l'l' 0 - Tr F: !I>. '\, Tl S'l'~• _,,

- - - - X

[J"l1'7J\I D -,. JH 00 ,'.<;, :

J' t • i "1('

,

• 1 , hov~ - , 1:i t 1 <'

• 71 ,l 3

t·1 1 hi .,C'"'""n, n. <"'. r t a ', ,. .. l.. '

-~ \ .. for u.t

I • '-

. , ~L

2 JO o•~ o•~. p.m.

<

11' p; • • •,1•1c-Jl, (hj.- . .:"•1f'-icn .1f thf' nnitr-c' Stat c; I.: , o. r.')iJc .. L~ >, . ...r ; ,ci'" •e ,Tu t · C() J 1 •

("

C" ~. •

.. i" TJ,.1, 1T · ,~T,1" • .,01.

., ¥ . ' -• "'

I 1 , '

I

, ' 1 '. 4

, ~"J'";OC.;, P Juqf-:,~f\ e ,1ust•'ce

'-'--'"'· icr t " 1 .. ic(.'

, 11 i c.."~ < t ,l t ir-i'

t .. r- ice

·r . 0 ..

I t• - (' Pr i r. r ,r

i' lr'ircr, r

: £, ) • ll r ( PT, re. l , ' I ... ~, " ' p ( rc-1.: rt 'u I I • I ( I ••il~h-:r1

v ·1-1• ' , ',

Page 3: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

,

m E i.i ;.' &J

• >

• . , ' . ,

Page 4: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

I? Tl 0 C .. E 'I r G - - ·- - . r1n. Cl! IF.I" "·Js1r er-: BURr' •,R: ly ,,, .. .i. 11? r To. 71-:., J - ,

'~r • nro•:>ks against Tenr o.;. _9.

•1r. summers, y, oJ, ]'ii '.:),' proe C •

rlR/\L AR< J', f, T OF uERT-Y H. S M'fPRf, .~ Q.

Olli '.RI\L 0 f ~t'P 4 •·• 'fl ·rIO!lfF.R

., r , rr:~y- t p . ·e t·1 ·

l

t' 0 n Ir ) 11aa

or

' in ' .i tc>rit. \ • ' '

C Cv . it r. "·h . .. ,, l) '10 • 1 ( I t ,:,n of

I • l<l V( 1>-ie'ly 0 .r i h~ f :t

:; ':la <:ici: lar C< :. Th<" .. C ~uo' ticn wt,· h r:ourt

.... r, ,lt C ~iorari _._ C, ... the que t-ion ')f WI\ th he tri,

. i;: \ . ir. rr: i.n rflft.~ nq ll' lo• t.h., de,. • r r, to hta

, C nf at oth~ 1itne•s ified

, C.. i'1 I dE'fE' Q •O he

r ,. •·01 t: n1 CJ t'1

l t .,. F~d.., a Co t • tu l

' 0).-:! Jt. ,n

.. pl .\(' ')t .

' ' cl r u

r t

Page 5: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

4

the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1.

Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin

particul!r mattr,r, mlG en1ct n i.11 Te 1nessoc in 181)7. I would

li'<e to 11ery hrielly oresen': the matt r in w;1ic:1 th'.s cue'ltic

was raised in chc tri~l cou~t, and to do t~at I v;uld very

br;.efly J.H:e to cH.i:e-c-t you·: .:1ttenti.on to -pc1qes on" throuqh

three of t:.t:e ll.pnena;,,c in whic', is an C'~:cerpt of v:he testimon~

'.It. ':h t

r

r a ·r

rt c. •lvr t1.·· "

o n

r

0 t l l

t

n ., • Y 1 1tion with

. ' 0 :; ti t

, 'l · • t .r , of ._ t • , yo 1

, 1 '1Lc-h st ·. s that ":1''

d .f r.Jnnt h c e,iti~y first.

rt')c,. · , . [

'Tl f l

·•nn. ,u

ob

kr

\T

,s: r wuuld li,e, for the pu1po~e of the

o r, V 1 .. J"'·, • th·~ t ~e, I ro lly ~o not

1. f' - • t t pt• .. ,lio:n on OI not, , rd ! wouln

t .:, I w.:.t- e -- , I'll U'JC

t n, "' , ,uld ik tt) re 'l''!/

' J • r y l<.l ' .:::tl. ( ,l, if th

t le. l y TT' 'l 'd i C t~--

' . ,

Page 6: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

s

At th.is t '. ', th A ; l n+- At )rn y C t(!ral, •-•r.

Donald Poole, interpo i.l'g, a' c, "S · • \" '11 w,iivo \:he statu .,

if you wc.ild wa.iv,:? tho . t1'·ute."

The- Cou::t r ilponde:d, "No, si ·, ''ti go· n '·o follo 1

the law, 'lnd the law ie, ,;s you kno 1 • t; to be, th, ;,. if a

aof ndant teotifieq h h 9 to tet+-'fy fir't.. l\nd o, during

tho r c 'l ycu cc, conaid"?r lh • Do ou have any~hing else

to ~rinq beforE> ~h Cr.h1rt b• fore wo recess?"

I r; c) h ·i ,n. r C, ~•a t E""l, :in,, ., " t: ' C } •1rth

<, ti y t!1at

l l h .... '

t , r , 0 r. I

" V u , C C' I yot1r

r, i th t. <; , oth r , 01:d i you int nc' let the

C. Z'OOK•• testi"y, h ·~1 h, ' be fir .. t.

' . r. S"J: 1MER~: Y:., u: Ho O"", o· co r""e, I understand

t~ C, rt•~ rul: on -~i 1. ·10uld 1 ·kc>, ·or the pt rpose o

• uld U.'c to ~- '::E'I !.IUVe to l :t" , 1 • >l l d,,

'- I l C •11 do it o t of the

ll

1 , i

, tha .,

t. .c I Jht

t

,

Page 7: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

y h • n , 'l to 0 t

', • <:: '· ,,:, ll h , yoi:.r o·· C'

·ul y not n e::· ,..ti"

Thi~ h m r n i.c 1 t C . ' t r, .in the tr.i<1l co•1 t.

very hriel:lv, I wn•1la lil• t r 'id .or he

st

sta

c-:ri

.. 11hich is n ••>l in this

In 1887, tho T r~e-

e I "'::led •

r C U ..

..

dn n i

• tf, f

C' l

,..

c top rnit o

t f in th r

t • 1

;

t

h 1 d

bv th

0

,

'"'u1l r I tt

J\ '"Cr. bl

t. h l • '

l :

V l,

t ,U

"I r

,

n e a

t fo

)

Page 8: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

7

thouq '1 ' V t . t ni r hie ,.. n ~ef~ 1':. ?

. r !, ' . . I I r,r.,r., '1 'l i l a ~. " ' - ..... 'l

c:i t€ d n tt .. . }, . c-'1 .. '.,c I. . C JC' C , Cler o 10 Vl""-rsu .. t°I"" S~":_.,

Wh'ch held that hn co tlc ·tt.fy in r b1tt 1.

"'his statut' ri c~,d ;;.n l 'l 7 · n coajur,ct · on t.ith

40-2d02, it's my coi~t n_io:'1 tha+ .• 1c> purpor- of the 1~ is!.a'""'

at that time w,ie that ,jO :l403 ,, s ;:;e, , a , afcty val •re, be-:au ·c

this ,·as new concept end I have r:i.:rr i."l my brief, ~rqus_c-~

versu _ ~~rq:a. It roe.it.-:, t hi "" y of ("f<'lnc nt to t .'itify

a"lc. ,_ '\ i!. l' ; <J n ,-1 CvllCOµt .l~ 188,. Tt n~d ju.·t •• r ccn•.ly

c<- 1 ' r ' l t .- I er n .... i:1r1 " C f d~nt ., r;.qht tr,

n f _, y 0 011 I , . C

... ·:ii. - a~on t'li ",

' . 'Ii l V. , , e .. • s \ f:c-a

' ., '--' ' g I 01 ld nC'.Jl ju~,

• ' C ItU itv I th ' hatl

·r . . t u <l ,·,, hi t.- ,n ., . }- c'\ n< .,lC pight t-c

~-t . 1&.LT' t ti-~ •• tl oc s .:i ~. hc-'1 • inu his ow

,;t 1y, < ti> n , 1ol<l 0r dc,.:t-o,:- h;;.s trst;'lony. T' i

; 'I 1. P.c.. on e • J. ..,1-lc t. T I CC' optec:' t.11< ,tatut:a ; P.

887.

.. t is OU C "T rtion 1 t ci l th brief 01\

i.h 1 l l I

• t ' .i I i"l .. hC'

Page 9: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

F th,

,

0

d ,. ar

u

C

t

<

Fur

t

r

1.cons

rn

l

n , X.

:

.. " tt:

I

tu ic l

n

n

.1 1

C' t- • "· a

('

, t

" r ' u Wc...r

en a

i h d i!J n 8

V r t th 'C.

l to av

l C. ru C

• nl- t

l- is

, 0

i

.. l

t

'1 l 5

t of

0

Page 10: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

' y h avily.

,,. I ', ('j C ti

, . - I :.i.k ) tat

r" V va 1

ti') n t 4 r _rely

le

r Ot t' el th

l\n C ) r, i·led to a nc-r . . ... r._a .

IOJ d a .. 1 ikc- to 'P n l . it citec'

t • :r: f 1. a ' t1 C'ou • au e i• rece y

0 • tt t or,' that: a >' cC cor.~ .~·. tee Tonne-

C l. IV ncs

' 0 ., < r 11 0 • mil

7 r -ti

:,r , 'Ji • -

hcc

, C . t,

( +-""}..3

t n u i - he

t i ' .., h.:- 1 ( ,.}"3iOr,

11 ot ,1, ' to , y '1 '1 ... c'!Sosc

t i w'tn fo t r ti!~ t to

. t .. ur t- I r

Page 11: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

10 T.C.A. 24'>3, ~hich fo:i:cc the c,' r--'la'lt t" t -;t-i.fy ".:..:s,t in

his clef n e if he intone" tc tcntifv .t. ,11. rt ~s f<>lt tr •

(' Ac1nt· s .OU le <1110 C"d 'o tcsl·ify <l'lY t'mP 1.f he

• • I , l " { 10 1 ~- ic • . o r h ,r

0 ' n i f:rs

• •• r - 1 iL ,..(:,.:ai"~'iP ,

t .t r > • C'l ··ne-; ,

i (' i..s ( t , Af •?

R, : ~,:-. TU . C' T< hncrc isf-, t p <' is ro

r rl j t b1:.t ; C 1 •c, ·-C pffpc ..

Qll STI11 •: uld . ,. l.. C' r·c-o 1 tion

r' Cl , ,j or h,li: o~, c,r is ·~ t fC'r t'1 ( ' 0 'c1nt

th t tl r co ~ndc I ct,, nc ?

'R. .. t'ndr r • 1 !; '"-tut ", th. - ::; · 1<10

'i r. ~nt lro, '-'r • Jt '·ic~, n<i it

ic l C'f . r, d "10 1, in rffpc

i: \ , r (>" to

t l J. •r ly , t fflf'St'

• \ ; v h.i

I •

r ( I h " , <lo, t? )(' f' " t~ ,>

t., . .... , ' ,. 1.>'J 'i ur llo ' , I OP t > coa ·~q of

I:•· C'cl I t would r t " lr ( to l 'int

l. , [ " n . t. C 51 ON: 'v n tt. u h i s ... -1 f n · t·i.o

Page 12: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

11

the proseouting witn!">so?

nt.1:i::•r;-0'1: noesn • ... tha-i; mo<, thc-.-e J s no pros,..cutic 1, MR. ~v r-1ms, I think, YB8, lr, normally this cnse

-t ; t ! • ·h t • - ,;-i t d.c· 0 (" ,1'fi • ch is ~1 .. 1.:d upon

'. ,:_, [' ~- y o'd C',. ..:,_,.-,t), a<.: 11 C, r. these

, , . 11 •r . "t t<" 'l'l')'t pir.:,;

' 0 t • ~n 0 t n,' IC' or

. . i s "l ''" . cc C. • C • C, t;xly '· ....

oi C)_ 0 ·.t .. t, t' p "r .... o 1 wh-, 7t It >£'lt '. , -~r r. a '1 l 'i

'-'R. r: f" ,< , Your Ii .,:i\c>r, V rv often thy will

pa r, of iacr, th f:<cC' t ·' V< ho hon<1 lc-d tt C<. C"' :I, 1n.:l

l 1 b des· '- t rl p ,c, ••1t "I'" 111r"' he cit 1..t1cce at. the

., (. 'lC' •

, t 'l ' 'nn ~cu have' rouqht un

,v t > 1 1 not

') ! •

J1 ' 'C a- 1~ C' <"' 'C "l rJr rne.

' c.>,l t ( , d V ·1t on

(

R,.,: ' , y_,, '"I ) •

Jf !Jl .n , 1h ?

. • J I ,>< , : 'i ., , a l, • n •

Page 13: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

QUP.R~InN: I am a1ar~ 'hat you

'!'hen you put on SOl'Re evidenc

MR. SUMMERS: Y s, Id' 1. I c 11

J

12

tion.

,~sgas,

Your llonor. One, thr dot ctive, t'1 oro ecu .i.n

th· s I atter, 1 ho had as n1y oriqi ,1 s ;iqm ent b

it1ess in

a onfc,s£ion que!'ltion and a lin p q L tion,

~, I rai c,J

VQU c le'

o c ~t re a·n i c 1:,.l~(t ' 0 ti c ••

n 1 n n · • ,i · l was n t

c,- +-: ' 1·

i t' 0 _1, j .t • C

V h 0 'IC rt l l C I

f C l (\ffl n ,ho "' in h. - ,,., l'nn

C led t' ,.., ' 0 Ii ,_r, s th I pu 0 . no .. Cour.t m y ond • '1. d I re 1ove ,,, . otion

r th_} h .. - t . d I id /)\; lo that and c-_t like

r• 1.: .r 't lf 1 C ~tninh .: ·lt l'k it would

lO r lor m co do '10

J \. r y ,\l 1j ' ., l

• L ' j ,1 n ,., • I <' l ' in

I . ; .... n

1 ('/ i: \ · on n " .hrE,

\ 1 L in t ' .. and

C: t .. <.;('> 0 ' jury

Page 14: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

13

him o:,.

might b:, impro;,er bc-cau!'e .... qo;; tsfo,:e th"' ju•:v t :act, w, y

caa't the O:cfend"nc t-asi.:ifv so I di-l not do it. :.: t11ought i.t

would b~ improp~r. I di<l it at or£> ti 1e and t'ler> ;: thought i~

Q.,""" .... ,.a.'iN • o · 1 "i you ! ., l 1 0•1 t for ,ll' nh • re the

,

r ) ... f Ye ,.. ~z 1'.:, t?-; 1 · o·" 'leorv

J ,1 t ul }.., , . o.,; ' -'U h r Ji:. ' C,' ·l ',;; < . (" , p "' uu ..... • n.t, t, '10

\ ) I k,. ·I {Ol ~· \ '1 ) l'l:t ,. n , _, .. 1 you

·, • 1-1 ,,1 to • e rcvc.rr ' t '1] er t'I c 1 r" ta ;?SS,

e ln " ... c,r c'la .ie, arn i-:'"I ou~· cortint·on ti, t --iy c.U.ent--

r.w '1 u y • E. ,l i,:,, th :: "!;. ing !"Ir. c.l r,,;. <' c (:J,e u n~ing of

r

"1f 1

,,

•t

h ' to r ..i • 1y cl if'nt on th~ stand.

a 'lo cr•min 11 re ore • It-•,; st-i'l:.111 it- 1 in this.

,., ("I th i: nn brc- u e h d <

' ,IC l ., l:'1t l 'l • Jt T a; n no'" , 0 ' I ' • h• • '• • l . 1r! ic-~

., V .al < to -,t on

\,1 l ' o• l t 1 , l l .,_ O!"' I "'Jr. iq ,, r, vl " -T l ,p th t .!1€1

Page 15: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

ta :ln so e w y af t th ir cl 0

out which can only b c>xnl ind byte cl c nda t

l·'nq co

king t

stand, or a non-available wit.nes , then In o c , d fro

putting him on in the TenneJ e proc dur.

QtmSTION: I krow hat your theory is

i , WR~ here prejud'c ir. thi,

if n CE"' llry?

R. C .... _IP.Rt:" Y ur o

t t

r. '

r.

0 1,

... C 0 t I c· it

C 0 y u'v gc, two · itn

y C, • l 0 to p k, ·ou

nnr cca .r a

,

t ..

t

l ~1

:01,0 on Jo-

t 0 lt' , . ; l

so y u a (l o:r

10 qo 111' to

C. . ' y' put t- 0 •lit ... on ~o

y ques .o

rov

?

l it -'

t r

b

C Rlac

C ,

call.

1 \Cl

1. th

1 in 1 '

I hi , 9,

1· C tJ i

Page 16: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

' r 0 ,t" Lr

T.V. a h r ct· v I' CH' f-r," t t Cl" 0 th ,r '1 C • • .... ,, tt ' "

pro-:oct1 · lo 1 ;1i tnl !IS to c<>m"' on c'o 'I' "'C., \-' qo boy that

hela U? thE sto~!, ar.· ~Y client , ic tc, < · ent: whc.n

thct t ok >lace. Thio cama out, n t 1t•· inq on th tate's

wi tnesi; \ o I had to c,ill my_,..lf l: • 1;. they d.:. 1 >t '>'lt him

on The fore, ~his ~itu~t-ion, t~e r ~1tt1l o. th l"Oulc1 onl

hav · beon 'y riy '> ':iculnr c• icnt :.1n1 r-, c t'n~, I '-'vuld not

:t 1t }, • • stat , r•, whc, 1 I 1t the , "' ct 1ve or, a 1 • questio,,c c

t •

I I

.. , ... .--,

t •

\ ll I t =,_

, I en l V he

. ' n ' t st ncl.

l l ·nt in

y , prof

C rnitte

t

' ) , [ r~

r Vr:> I l k 'I t t 1 t " lpcd

S. Ye,<, th'1 i c,. inlv i:.lci !,ave -i

i ~O lr 1

1 ,. ' l ,

t

'l,i to tift d first,

r

ive

1 on ae; f\

h c.

1 u. t he

r

it'

Page 17: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

r.

0 t

r ,> ' '1 .· on ant

ot. t.ir. !r .. h

0 '.

lt;

t-ut- r cm't

,...t v c , an

t-)cn •ou ,1 nted to I n .• ~ttve h,

testified to, c0ulc"i yo1 t~1in put-, im h.ek o~?

,...,f ':enn-

cssee ~roce1ure, I c 1ld r.ot.

r

y

i

·j

QUESTION• Th n wher'.! is vo·1r J:'Lejud 'C'C'?

••n. ,U :. , , Your nc.:Jlo ... --

~UF ION: ~hi w,~ a t g;,ilty nlra, wv1 it no"?

.. , ,

\ ! l.( 'l C W CJ 'IC 0:0

1 1 "I •J, r I, he

0

V i

t') • C L u~ I, t. - opose

• l, I) l ·c t. t • f' 1e • C to get ., r ~t " h t :-i C n 't de ... T , ose it' 1 ,

, r rd V l t y \l VC "l I t '3'10 , t:-'t .. pr,,.juc.ic

C : y 3, 'lir.

re v1 ,i '10t ,uiltv pl a 11n'l h( w,s tri.cn

, C:.J lVi

l. l I, (' . V t"'f U,11 \l

, ' r ia

?

Page 18: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

deci ·o

n7

! l

' (

- it

) : l

. in c'I • "I ,.

R. I. 'll (' : , s5

., ' V r _:C. I .

,utho i d V rf

.. i I '• ~til' •

i ri C r

I

l +- ,

t

.. 0

1

I

t. 1

C w

V t

7

~Cl'! l

l u+-

.. 1 co

t '

l ' I 'J

~i

, 4 ... , li~ l h l C s a

le- c, .h O!> r ti h tc r

< , p r l r l 81l , b,c

C • (' rt I ht "l <) 7.

on t .. d a t in

tit

y .... 1 cas

i y.

' ti v.

C V C in

t 1 t

t

. LC

n < "" t. ..

'l t 'lt l •

n p

Page 19: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

18

'llow, '1 'ltated b\'· ~r. n.1.ack in t'le llj l Liam:: versus - -wh ·, 1, •tat 1 V y • f1 , i'l t:h·• • c 1 C ang,-.,;

t n ... 1~ n I , tf l ' CJ,' i • • ,lC .,aid • . , 1 1 a r nrdl£'3

) l r < i 1, t ca e l .,ar

t~• l ly l:. tr 1 t: n ,,t ., t is only

' ut. ,.

' ttat t tu._ 0 1 t" ,rC" comes

1 C' bu nri ·t »·1t U'.JOr t l!f !l'lt \ ,i.r (' n~

Q'll'"S'I' [ON: 1 11, in thi C Wh<.. pr .. yot.

f . ut in lit, on .. ft~r th) ofl:i-:: 'C +-est fie ? ' • . d ym a<: ., .,~c- i:,u+- ' il ,till not clear.

"; ·~· is. ('> u

.. .. 01 C • r u • ~i"' c..n f. '1

r. • t u p • u it.

i r ' V ' V i ii t-hl

r 1. (' u tion o

u:' C h

( ~(' • t i r•

" \ o,.b• t, I l \,.tY' PhJ • ,· i w'i11 · t

y h 0 l t ? , '1 t .. co • C ,., aft

,J ru c., so n. 1 cv,.d.- fol Le in ye r .. tinony

her Y'-' ould Pl:. C' r r. :'I • i a .>rr C

,;u .. R~: n 'o 'l 'If' ri . th

1· ti n whi. 1 ,l i L 'l ·"ii" qu io 0 rc,but.t 1.

Page 20: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

1

Qt;J":STION: Oid I ,:,orrc,ct-ly 11n,1 ,. ta'lcl " t to ,;ay

thnt in rcspon!.e to Justjc-:i Blackrnun'a quc ,t1on, I>

be pui; on in rebuttal? h" c, n

l!R • .;UMJ.!rRS: May •· have ~ust on0 mrment, rr•1r

H, .1or. t think I can fincl that.

Qu;.• ION: Go riqlt nic,d.

.p c; ,Io:si 'r, thr- cc c c told

' r C ' .. l. ' r ,. ,., ": t

, 'l Cl lC c.c c>nu nt c" "d l ' 'lti

, • t , " L ' I cal 1 h ,,n I tt ,) £ • l i 1 '°lul:t

s t G£ny that d f 11d " h;r. d-i:tot nc - l off ,.11 'I.; C ti 1 -,i;no to d cp th" C1 '~ In at. ca<1c-, "cu:.:t de i.. c.1 0 .,_ lo., the ,,.f nt:.:int to tC' ti y on ohjrc-t n hy \. r e, ,, l 1 of cou~ n vur r;tc: l. tt '-' Supr ,n~ Cc-urt '11' ld ii:

,. >r for t C f n not 0 t C' ,ble to he <'.'..! llc,d ilS a \ ll I t i1n "J'.: , ") 0 nnr. ,c,-i: tr, C'"IF' t·on, ne co 'cl. I

l (' l )l' ld rr C'l ll d a

' t p ... ,, 'la t ..

'" . l t PX f, ''J, ir

l ?

I . , C,

1,·ci,, c r r

Page 21: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

the ritatc- tom 1-:1', i v l tr'cc tc c· 11 h ' m on r;u ,ut+ , 1

after •the- o·catE" put on rcbptta 1 0 n W l' thC l'f ice> "I<;

tcs~'fmonv tlat you haa bought 01~ ~n yc-ur own c

this isn't lc-qitimatc eurrehu~t.i.,, ev n t•ouqh in "

; ·i ·'Ji: ,.

yot, could testify, your cl.' nt cot•ld t '3 t:~ ':y in st:,.rchu , __

ul<1 r 't t~ ,t •p hl'V < "'h jc.ct · on ,ou t:r i tc p,.. ,. you C or J I .,, n ;.;.r C' " iu,t tor ...,, t -,f c) \ of C t -t h \ Vr:'

J ..,,.?

, l V \ r'.

'y "f.

!1. s ' . (' ,

u 0 t• C

h ti ...

s tt r o. f3ct, racked

tt C'ou:..

I'),,~: hat• hy yo·1 · ow I t ·imony- · h t w,,:c;

y, c n ovide,1c ?

,

, 10 I

h I'm ~r•. d hou~ i

• •

, , 1

( t, , r c- 1

Page 22: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

21

Griff ii! "!',,.J...'£. C, 1;;.fo~.1.., th i · t'1 , <"l'f "O, t 1-t,,; , ,. -,n~ • .. , t• -

tional ·:::.qt,t i:o ,:,:main r-ilcn·. OZ cou,:sr. i..hat c-ar i •,as

deaJ.:i.nq w•.cr. com.Ticnt on {:he failu'"<' of the> c1"!""'n ,ant <-o

testify,

We respectfully ouhr.,i'.: th;:i'<: this pr~ced11·•e that

we h,,._,c in the Stal:c of '.L'cmnf':::!ltH? is so fdr in i:hc> nino:.ii:y,

it:'r; no·: b~.Jn 1"optf"i h•r <1ny state> cxc";:>t the Si.:.ctP of 1;eni:u-:rr,

it's noi::. l:ee,1 n~on\. d hy i:'le Federal nulP:;, it's "lOt. the

~u lr r-1 ., l • r r ,....,fu·• JV 1hmil: t.il rc-=1 l is!'U

,. 4 CC'T,3. • ·--·on plie-; 0 < t.:it~s

I. ,, l:- • 1 . 1 :r a, • ·a'3l" •

r r li (_ tr, " t•r t· for

r

4' : • .,t ... ~, ,:r,rc- \, ·1 ). t ' m, in th

p, •• r i :I ' il to t , ; t t ' f' -thi cat1~

ofi d to ... " ta u .c onr"i t,c> cot•rt Wc..B ur• · l linq

to do ., ii: a ~.J rJ..v [r C'U n,:: 0 ~at"i(""l,n that lie statutE" •

is waiv i by "\Gr IT' ' .. hl'tW. n tt par'cies and the court or

il it t?

P. ' . , W' I J • I this art.:.r.ular , •tter , .

t t 0 i' • :ot ·ht ) t·1r,• t·~cs "'ri.cr

• I' .IC n win &- > C''lF .. ,

I c' .. t'i t..t. 1~ 0 l:e-rc-,

C, ~1 'le i::hu to waiv:-,

on I t. • t I ; wi ' " ll lc ,i t

Page 23: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

tohetl.VCl.

1'1.;;,,, -.:,:' s h'l'l hcC>n ti1c positior, of o .. '·t.i J.

judge t!1ere .i.n c;.a Lt.:.nooqa -i •~ tr. t ~rne>'l t.'iu. t , ,, :;xi.<

to raise it.

QUESTIOH: :r.s ,;his ~C'l1C't,l ly c:1ly regarncd .:.c C

rule of procedure? How is ~t reg, roPd? ApparC'ntly ~his

judge t:t:"lats it as a rnat,:e,: of suhst·an ':ivc- law in nome wa!'.

"R. SID Q:RS: I fe::il · t J.s ,nore a m.:it~er of p:r.ocec'u:

your Fono. , 11ut i '1 'IC no··· hC!en :i:a:.sed--;;J, in i « <'ons .- <'k:r:ed

t tu·. • h:.C'l h-'1 J h c·1 on the> ; oc,'•s for thif' 'C'ricr of

< t j n f f c~E 'l , '1 V 1,,:, ll raj "'\(1. . > i,u 7

C' l l ou;__ (.' I ~. t t ''"'IOCC: • C ::'°1<?L"

r ' 1: )I' L F rv,•y C r.c, h ':

C.\ tr~ C 0 . <·" "1hic l an ,

0

QU '""1:0 ': r. Sum, E , vn , la< t Lrc'ln ••

A· yoi: a:· Jir J l:.l ui:><l'.1 Arn 1"<1 ,.c· t hcce a:.1 t cl 1 n~ i. lP

~i.ft ?

~R. SUi'L Er-- y, [, ),OUT Hone--.:.

QlT,;s ~o,;: <eccndariJy ..ire- you forec]y; d hv

ot lir.,i i qrar.'t o{- C"'"' •tiorri:i? t·, en' t our ".Jr...int of

ce · :ior, ti here l im.;. · c-c,?

< .,.,. ur I'? • l'\y n 0'11' I .._ght,

, i ' > I f J'i t l, JU t ( . 'l,

, , ,

Page 24: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

23

en @rc•r Con st. ut .ton •. ch "i .t. inl . 'i .irni ll:"' -'-o ··-.hp

l ?1 • n • r . t , ·h r'ch'; of

crimiral pro~ncut~o~ tc u J- •-~ '•}- f ·•i J, l.l ' ('

he :cc ny himsel .... n~ hi-- coun ': i..o

cau~o o-: the .:-ccu.· t'.ol' ,1qainzt hi • '' It f,ivo·•n '3" r-<'ly

"lals and he ;1culr! no~ h c.cx r, Lled to -iv oviik cP.

•s~inst himself.

QUES'l'IC.l~: 1y ques .:ion de, ~.-'1ed, r

of ccrti0r ri rcs·~ricced you '.:o t:he F'f.:h,

l · Tl· ter qr ant

..

O ly

~1R. St'11-0"RS: Yo·u· f!cmor, I l:hink pi:-oharlv i::

n• ily · ' ,.

• LI

h , ·ou

. . J.

i) ;_ ii' J

, . •

J:: -, . ~E' .... J •

·e mi tcs J t. yot

0 -:-,• r., • nn - Fe• ri:'er:n~J-,

r £> C'<'. .t ~s

C • r' :..o co

.. . . l, .· r

"1 pt fc, r c,t i..o 'lUhn-·: t

ou arcmm r,t w w · 11 a ·er it t•n'L.; < he- r,, rnincr •

m. :.i,;~ onrc,·: :;:1: it pl .., h C'our : , 1 would

t in th<" mo ,,. , . • !' Jt ... ~J.l/' t

r

Page 25: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

24

(Wh<"rcupcn, ,'.\t 2:58 o'clock, p.m. thr.> eourt 11as

rccc~, d, to h. rC'cor · ned at lo:OO o'clock, a.m. •~c

foll' i· ruy, P dnr-, lay, i'!lrcn 22, 1972.)

Page 26: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

;:M 1_ 'J.O...:. ',i; '. . '" 1 'J1. :_1

- - - - •

l:," 1" L, T RC ,

t )

: • j

t

Page 27: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

MP. . Cli!EF J J'TICP. BURG : :

ncr, .in No. 71-!: .,1 ·~, ,_ oks Od\P ·;

1-1":. ,.i , fOU y l roe-

CI> ,... tjl, 0 T

," ,B

b C

). . ,

C

'r '11

••

cl.

tr' Q.

" j

r C' th

tt r. •

la

< C s ~o ,..i:,

• • h. c •

.. ~ -

q tu ·c-

1 codi~y

C ,., t,

Q r. wr:c.

Page 28: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

:7

. .t:.;

0 , ''": .- - 5 l- 1 t to do

':l"· ' bi; .l• . 1 - gi.' l ••e ,.)l'.'( 1· .... , . ' l i- i . l-> . i C • .(' • • O:t ··-

0 or it, i Ii T t • ., ~i r'. V ,e .(' ., .

11 '.) ! tt (<' i: • • o.t ,., . ; r ), d .... 0 y :-,,;_ l. ,_v._ ,.,

... ..£ r -'• -C •

·, i.

-.

l

,.l. l

l. tc

... t.:-ain d

l

, i C , to the

k t1'"'

, '

Page 29: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

l .;.ey •. f I )r

' < ,. l"t ur. '1C I

' tr. ,. 1 , ... (. < r l ,. ' . "l'.·

h . < . ... .. I ,- C 'E< ,. . ' u o<- -·· r H r, 0 tr ,, ,_ ") t)C., hi'-. "-" . t '=>1 Y - , f •~i ... :o,, t (. 011ld ilce

!. .. , ,. ,1;-i." "H t 1 .. ,. cc::::, to

... '

,. r • C C

'\ y I •

I ' , • r O ._. t

J• · tn'--- ,

' l • · 1_c e r ·.o

C ) C ' Not

C .tr •

1 t ul - _,. cd or

Tc :: ,t . '1 w r. IC y n 1t, .inde

1 r t l

Page 30: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

,, 'l

, ft 'l J , yin ;1 0 .. .

., r <;o

r -~ <; ,

: ,.. j r ... L' t ,

"'"' I • (" T u !:O

1 r \.... l< -~ I < .a ?r 0 ·: 't i < ( l .t:' w C~1 t..1e

d. n~ , <'' d .'1 }', . ( I 1 u r ' ,l , r,d ,] ul \ t. '1

C ra , Ot' doc"

C ·,h: l:

t y • ... , 01., "".d .

theL:

'

0 r • ; . ". ·1; k ~I'

r ' j iri th ... ) '- J.~'- C

u ., t c;.,r

~h th '1 'rtic;., • .... 0 kc ,, I > -I 1 e the."'

• ... r i;t-

Page 31: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

thr

r

l

I) c >ulC:n 't ~i t~."lr the, ' '

rlc.,c ld -nt b ir, ,. )Urt?

t· r,.. '8 DPtc• l~ t ind

Q

' , b · in co n:t?

c,

er· ,

) .

z, tl . I;; >n I r.a,i ·o th;,,

lt ( - , l r. Ju c~.

nc"' th ot: 1 '-..: o~ t 1c pr:> ,1 m, '>f ~oui:• --, th:-_t the

' ' ,:: :ic 0; h" ..-hr

I t, ' ,, ~·c • ::e

' .:: •

. t . "f • '1 1a.y

, r i t,,c .

' ' •• h

) l e ·o• , \Jith th

0 , , - ~u r .. 1,. i. , at. nll

) J < {~ ,/OI tr " c u.~str'l-

'1 ~, . ... i ~t ... Tcir- 5 :a-; .:;tntut::,.

, . < C no ... i - c:.:iv

. '>j r: . t, -Oc\.i, ,- '"Ulr>, ln

4 t o on~ g

l 1 - I th t

Page 32: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

fo- i·.

l

,. I:"

, l. ~LlPit :

p. "t

Q

l"'t",,1

'J: I\

t,~ " . l

• ' .

,

• t-c

I ... ' ... 1

• ·1' '• , .. 1 • 7 I . '

w < o,

t.1n·p ..... .;,

- 1 to NineLE n" C

.. ~" h:r ~r

t •. C, - ' 1d, ~.,), r.

."t,

ye-: '"'ere ~Y.

• ,1 .. y, tt.c. ·efend::mt

• to

L r

' 1t th t •

' t 't .. ?

' .- .,4.. • ·hcii

' I' t - la"Jt

. ( I. 'l • t. •.' no

e .. • t c· . c~ Chatt ~ncoi::-ei.

• • .. 0 ' -'l

. i: . . ... I 'l < I , ~v ·he w I

r" J. C .;,r in

11 r- J

, , t

I th l •

Page 33: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

c t'C •• ··t €' n· C

') ) 0 1 t y'_ .. ' ' "- 1,,,l,

~_;_g; t t'l :: i •i ) l l''

... ,p. I' m.nc1 . "r t ' I' • • l"

h i J:.y t-tatu c: r dOiJ."" . r , t_ , • r r }.l n

Q ... t ~..:. 9.1~ ,.., • , ~J i' ll., ,.,,... ' .s, .. . ' ii:?

l,F. ' • P. IC~: ,• 11, r • ' l a:. h·

t t r l:, d r

- l ·. · h '--hc1. • ' .., .. vbJ',t!tt 0

' 0

.. l< 1 . 1

.. C, •• .,, .. h <l , 1·

C. t. e,, \ i. h h • t ' r , ,

C' • •• y r

l '

r', .ht

.,. WO' .C

t ..

s

ar

t tify,

. d

·•~ . - '

Page 34: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

? ,_

y ;, 'hut's the a:iy t + the tr'al

l l .. ,,. , • 1!1 + ·• Wil'f 1

. , .,, .. • -:el i.n

L 0i l ,· -::1c " . " ... ) r n t ,.. .

1 \ t"",(, /

.. j tc ,, r.

j t ' . 1.'. f/ r· _: t.L . ,7 "r~r r .. JoJ • ' <

_j t n ,. I:, i

l • • '1 t} 'l ? Djc'l

.. , '>d i..n

,

. . ,.

' i4'"

..i ,Ir . I ' 1 r d L ··c- go on

f , • r ·r - l n' C t.1 ~- r • 1 S Li '"t.

{ ·, •t l ' l< w ·" C' f; J:.

.. ' ' "l"'" 0 • L • ,. P•

> nft""'-•

Page 35: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

Q Anc1 t r,.:·.mc C V t f , {> •3 . h~ld i:hut.?

'l'h.:-t hi:. Fa iJ ur.~ to cro on fir \: --UR, In~DRIC' . r.rh . vU 2.( .~ C'Ur

Q ··- :1100 •,. d hi,i l'i ~"ll: 'fy· HJ <ny l

, ~. l~ .. ,) I 'Is 'i. j, L ... :1.1 ).1. c, r1: en;;,, d · io;:._r..:. ,

t. C 11:rt 0 C' .:'!"[in " ;t. .• ,. L~ A . ,...1.on of 1', ' ": , .. . ' . . ,1 l 0 vn

, .i ? .. l

';

,.. • • r 'l

t l :

C, . l,

tr ' .., 11' lt 7'

1 t ,y - r

· I - ' • 0 •,i, ..i th·,.

' 1· i n ,. .. 'h .. tie

"l 11 U: •

) '} 0 ch:"t" lr

<

h ' 1 ·t.

Page 36: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

')

Q

I' .

• f '

• •

.. r . l, ,ti' ,.. .

t- · 1 ,. t· • • ·a the c c·

It. ·.f: a

":I" hr c,·•· .. J• .-,·1c1•'

l t , .

,

I ,

r

LJ

C, • •

I (" ' -

' ' ,

·'

•.

' t r u -:

r \ • !.lie~

t cl ( ., (f (J of 0\: !):

': f

<

il

., •

' .

• 1>: :\ udr,-,. '

e.

, tr'e'"

"' ~ht.

'" •("'V,_· .,._•I Of

'1 t,.

.. , , VE ·1 1 ·hr. !lint ,

i ct, t . ... 4~ Nas r_c,

rt ,Tu!qe imp1.y

h .I C x,cant .. ' t ,.. . ,, qt,;i.r.

~c • h' C

j \,1 J

l:

Page 37: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

1,

l.' . .- ·j r q -0 1 ith

,.

,. \:.. '0 • . . , ,

• ,:_ I r ' h,;t -he ... .. .. 0 ';h_.., •

r< •• lo T'

<) 1 • ,. ... C :r . I '. '·h ,h ,. V . d h}'

0 "t s E:.

e ... ( ~. ... ''''°' i' J.' h ' L

a.

c. ,--

0

s- -0

t.i.

C.

,. r

L "h

• 1 \ 1 h t's

• I cent· y

5n 0 t of

i i I l'i"lOUS

Page 38: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

J · .. tic ... t I , f _, • - ... 1 •

r. ; ' t J a !J

, , ... J ' • ,

' l j C •• b.:. · - I

~I'. ,., ,n 0 :r • 0

,. -r f ti p~t · 1-.._c;,r, • ... , ., . 1 t \. .. l -t

r, .:l tn r-: c3 " t r l ,, ul • ~l ,

:l • y r) r~I"· ... c.o •

( ' ... h 'I; ' C to.

0 • ~· . ., ... Jl• .... t .en 1 I

J f ' - I u

( ••

j

r • I

t C • i

,) ' 0 t_}-.

X u ... J- y

, , 1 ... ure

Page 39: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

h ing ., "'·" r c-... 5 ac '"lC' ?' ·. c ir • 1 .. ro1.f.

·t ' h 1~; .• , · r- 7 t..l 1 : ,

. - i . . of ' C \ ·.r,; ·c •h I

e C r n

•c ... :t

, t. .. ,. ly, .c p 1 i-, e ... C t.c p t' -.er' t

tt ., )r r " .l E =>'",.. r . .., .h· C.r.; ';I -::c~, C"'., • '1 .. nr,~ -~ C t ,.., , " ... i "l

r t:r , ; cu , ' ~.C" .. "1 D'r ,.' "O • ,· in }' i.) 1• p io

.i .. ·nc i' i 't" I' .i·"· i, •

'1 c-. • 1\ C''", s • l .• Jr,: Jec~:i 'l) of i,:hc

C ( . ' % L , l t; "o W'43 0G ,1 i. 1CJ V"::-::y

' ,_ ; ' 'I'\ '"-h..-.J.c-q,s 1c

.. t

' • t' rel l I

• , ;

• i.lT

, l ' t • I l " ,ut t ' ' I

1 , l ' ' ,. ' r t::> !l , 1 , 't ':.i ) thut's

'· t. ) •,,,. r., , ... • i ,<., ., ,~ ·-C to t 'u:>

' ... +?

Page 40: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

, 'I

t J .. . ': l

i

t~ I - ' .. l.

• - .-.·. :-<1l,

.. . .

.. ' r \ 'I: -. ")I"•· .. that

'I , •• . \: n r o-k 6' ' ·'h s . ,. . ...

' . t: ,_ . 'l ('; ...... c~', d i~ , l •

(\ V e, •· I C t C; •• I U~'l < .(JUJ,.tr

t ,, C, ir.

(" : 1, • I • • Yy <- ... , ... -· er.t I ;;,1ink

.. t:. t: (' V f lit

r '.l. ,_ . , .

... ,,. s "\ hi·•tJ

" ' Cl

.. " ·, . .. l :i.r, gr . ,l .. i,,g

(" .. i, ion on

• •• )h "'T{ h . I" ' • , . t'•:: 1' , .. i .. .t.:_u, "' (., :1 firs .. -o• t

(." ' Q ro ,t. d . 1 ')T. or ·t was th

Page 41: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

40

reason that th ~rozocuting wi;_n '"S h:.id t? go :.::irr;t?

MR. F.~NDRXCK: rt did not ccal:e i I: the::·e, but WC •

have, b~• j udicie.l deci!;ion, the -.:cquirement t,1tl:: chc pr.Jaecutin<J

witn:ass go first.

Q So~I: of hind~iqh~, isn't it~

HR. Y.E~1DR!CI<: I oon • t \now t • c1t, Yo i::- l!ono-i:. I

think t1hcn it- f.ire.i: c .. ., p th", til _ cou:i:-~ · \"lee. that way.

Q You oor't tt.r.k :i.t' of du_ proc~ss

toE.t a n_ son i cnt;;. tl d ::o cr,n· re•. :1iz vi tn • · ccs, as to ,ihan

t. i;u; o , l:' pxooi: < n ho • h ut it on:'

R. <F'D ICK ,: don't think it'' a m&·:~-r of auc

,r 1S'", Ye, r !

nur. r of c::iu hv .301 H:byc•

'>rt' '"ed l • or I ~•ulat. · r1 U1e ci: ..,r o

0

tut cl ["

mu , . " .... • I .

··o

ro r

But w c

id i;;hn.

L, i..?

Bl'OR~C '.:

., ••

t

..,u

•' ' . l •

' ,..

r iat 'o

fvllr '"~ I:,

1 tit ( < j

( \ ' tn

:i.-l ., l p

,lat' C ·C. 1

to t, n f..1 • <:y

ru e, •1 :( ·n•

-- ~n· in fact a

:.. ·~ .1 l'-\7.

'\ :f r nt ~f tha

'" • , oing to t "-i:y

1. ':.I s·Ci-=: ...

(' u• i,g w.,; t:-1ess has \.:o

llc ui lic.,nor. If he's

pro~o, Jin t -is

Page 42: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

Q Well, you cquatc the p.:-c'>ecu1:inq witneso wj_th

the defendant, end I suqgcst that that's impro~er.

MR. KENDRICK: Sir?

Q :r suggest that the p:c?socu•~inq witness and thg

defendaut are not in c<1ual pos:'..tions. J,.- ::: understand it,

thia is Donald L. Ercoks vcrcus t·he Stl'lt.A of T,;mcssec?

MR. Kl'"DRICI(: It i .. I yer

Q I ,ion't: even knew w'.10 :.:h-: procec\lt.ir.g witna~1

was.

MR. I Ert>RIC.l-: 11 l l, I' wan ~h 1 ~:ho n d h. ntci:e

Q \" J , ~· "' an h n't a par,y.

. • :.-. l- ....... ~- .. c ll, .,, t ·rt . ..,.

0 ,. t s w i::hc "l1"1..: \' . • R. i) c. r: T, St •• ::h~ p.:.rty, that•o l:rua. •

u I o~ l. 'L 0 t l;e, ,'ly ,: '• t .. h~ '">roscci; ting

. i {\

' ' .. r t .n 1· ¢ u C ;,;i h • 'l been robb ... d

. h I, Q'l~ : ) j (" . ... ) . .:: nJ h 'c the c-~ic.:: wil:1.ess

0 l St t > •

"1:r. . . t:-i p .. ; ti n': i:ll'C iJ ·, th..it Q • r ",Ch,

thE' e i a t - n . e· I t; eq\''- t. .. ti-:>n i:u).

l .. It Ni> .lC '1 y ' t,e r- ... s.

Q 1 ' < i t"l "· do" n't h ?

[' ,: y I t doc

Q I !\ 1 ll •:c , r witnesseJ seque ,:.; -:ed in

Page 43: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

42

'Ill criminal cn::ies routinely ir. T<cnneGu( , even l.f no rnotie,,1

~e ma~e to do ~o?

HR. K~NDRICK: lt'z not a matter nf law, t~o juc~e

routinely Gays, do tho par·::.ies Wwni: t:~e :i:ulo: nd, rather

routJ.nely, thoy say, re do.

rule?

. t..

ait.

Q ')o t,, P" ;:ties , ·:mt the r.ule, he says?

!!R. ICENIJ !Cr<: Y a, si:..

{) 'l'r.9y sey, We lo, and hen +-h"1y ,tc.rt.

l1R. Y-E~ D;:i !Cl< :

Q •1, V., wh t h.,p~ns !!: '•h- d..;" n l..,nt waiv'ls the

Q

!-1

Q

Q

Ye , ir. ,)o t

O, tCI,: r .:>th ·, r hu.V

ru ot ,f ect.

u .. a u.tc • · 11 ::1 efl:oct, ·:hat• s

• CO YC" ( t t" t?

• : ' I '0,1 • t '·r oi1 t~ t. we have to rr,eet

, 1 (' ,·11 .,~ly t.10 •,t'ltute unless it's

•t ·. e .. Gtatc off~ s to waive it:

• ") 0 I n h to. Agrees to

th e inv oa · n t' i c c? T~10 seq

Page 44: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

tion rule?

MR, KENDRICK: I do not ,;em mbe:.- th.it, if it was invol L'd,

No·.1, tro refer t'l Cou~t, .;..: prigc~ 13 "'nd J.4, to the

decision which requirec thia, the --

Q Are you ::ip citing of your ~wn !n:icf r.c-J? Paqc·1

13 and 14?

MR, KZNDHICK: ., . 0 y, Yo

Chief Jnc·.:lca.

P s 13 aid 14 of our br•cf,

ju ici l rt \J rn r:t t:, t th• o .. oc cu'•' J w'tnc. go n £.:. t ,t.

~11, .. h.[ , '>cen C le .. ' c:-r,o 1st a.;e tha

'l'ohet • e h e in -- ·n·r, C .. , t , ;.~ ro <l 1:!.q\!

u r b ( i li:. q qu -~ "'"t that ,

°l',Culdn 1 t 1r. kc i C : · tutio1 , . In 0 .. u j' . '" of g->' cm e '• St tee-•

ro, Hr, ., . d , cl • \'..()l. .i 'l . . • h

Y,p .. ta ,, \ y I: 3 d w re!:" r <) c:n o,..,in · C"1 bt

C ; ' I • .,

I! n, on p gc J ..:,f Ju t"c""' l ck UI' in -- :l:.Y.~

our r1r f, i:.o

u

r

u ' 01.- b;

. t .. :a

\, ,f

' . , . ..

•.

. .

f

ff - •

; dgc c.ho\ .1.d 0 ut v'>., ag t

, re dinaJ es with it c1G

... p· on l.y i;;refe ... nn .. J.tern .. ::e

.., tv ,J'U' .:.:.cc I lan 's o•,il" ion

1<';71 c. ion "'h · ch we cite in

+- 2 , t. w r fP.r d,0 Court also

Page 45: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

to Mr, Justice St .•,·nrt1 r conc-1rrin·1 opin•or in fpencer v..,, ~,

also cited in our brief.

Q 1. b2J.icve tr ~t 'o 'io oo.

MR. I:ENDR!C.'l~: l'gain-,t :i'e,mo. 3P.5 U.S. 352, at

567.

Thank you, &ir.

Now, in the tilt which may remain to me, I'd like

to turn to tho ., tition<ar'c cbjcccionr, -to the '!'enncsoee

statute, anc1 I underotand :Erom h::.1 oral n~:111rne\'\t yecterda',·

ti"1at he does conc'lde that. .:he fi ."t • AJ':'~nd , 1t ~•u;,t.ion i not

before the Cos1rt in vii"'.•, o-;. t':. h:"i; d i: .~ of c. rtic:t&,:i,

H"s Fife 1\: ~n ,t · rt, :..g·.11::iC, .<-

th t ';hi .:ul,. ir c-, , i"l • :i. J-" U;>

i.n iJe t.

' I r t h. V, • ti.ink, :tater , 4

cnn "' i t '.o c' 1 .;irovi'licn

, i r i ( ;;.qt t;1., a:i:d. 3ut: n0\1 he

• j r " .. r ri.,h~ 0 k r ilc tt.

) J •c; ,;;," h; b (I{ ' cor,c'!deo, nnor dces

. ·]:, r.;..Jl:. . £ W'I 'ill , . lent. " his t C r . .

; t. LO ti" , • C u hP. h ~I qc> or, i!:i.x ,;t I if h~

go ,t 1. , t .. .. ,, j ' ,. .it•: ng co 1) Ol l i ;:·i v:L lege or

'l n ·t E t1 y, ' ,c • • cl ' [ , C Ii,_, .. di ~r1c,1lt.

Tl " to thit. i< thll pe. it-.i.or .. and

, ti" 1 .:', 9 .. .. .) tr.~ 1 • th c:.•

Page 46: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

45

teutirnony wil). be, wh~' the wi t.ncss::?:; w.llJ. c: y, o.nd ~o

C:eairability for waiving the right to_

the sta.,d in h.l.a own he'.111lf.

'1 silent ~n t king

Our. faeli1 g about i': in th'lt •: e, • t.h5·,q i hat i'3

li~ited, as Zr cs th• def nda1t :a ~enc, , tho opr,?rtunity

to trim o~ to colo:e o to <-alsify hi t stimon·, .:.·o confo:.:m •;ith

what the other ·iib ., ., o, hi c.e h

whi,t the cm .. 'l u .l fo~, ,ly suy -c.: at we h •

Co:.irt to.

The d< f rd ' .. yri that in ch""'"'" n, ti, t-lJ ':i "y, or

i:&ing '.:.hat choic t tr~ lJ_g nning 0 h Iii p oc-f', ha -1:hcr

haz, :i;dn hire-;e. f 0 :$S-OIi m·ra ior~, 0 b' -t~ il: c .. lf

to the h, • -i d 0 r - •XD!\'lln " • 11 l, '1 ct~ t. u

every t•ii.:n~t" wl,o £' on r.h" st J b h' -elf i:.o th,!:

hazar • An t' e t 'II' ld that :i z ~a

e of °I' - '1 r ': ,es -ll,.-. L .. l • rcgart.

• 0 u t C ,;; ·.:1q to ··it. fy

t J )T' 0 .' . d t 'c"l _h,,u1d b Left • ,

,;_ C • t l ' , po·n- out a'.; page;

L- o• t lat '1- d ei d ,. l t!lc un•et .. ered '

I .,,y t "cl" d s to uhc.n he can

y, '1 re .~c:- l " _..:?_:,_ 0 n ..£, (:O the

i C .. I n I• f 't.ut·on 1 .., :r le- mo.ke him

C dl.f f. t C ..,-· c~.

I oul t<.' , qu c-kJ. y ..l Ii urteent'1 J>.mendi.:ent

Page 47: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

46

ergwr~nt, which I view in thre~ parts.

One is that i'i: impores a burden upon hi!:l. It doer..,

to soir.e er.tent, 1.i.mit hini but ngain I rcuind the Cour~ that

he's not rostrictcd f-i:om testifying, he may tC'3i:ii'y, the

court, tho1,gh, will require him to tcstif.y firnt. But t!lere's

no reason why he has to hoa,; the "-es,:ir.:0ny of his own w· :;r s ... es

before he taken the ~tond. ~hero a~ a lot cf ~ooc rca.onu w~y

he has to hear tt.e t,;i itirnony of the I i ;1cs of the- <;tat

ageJ.not him: but hf', ou,ht "o k ow l;, oi;o h' on. w·t

to..'<e '.;hf:' s · ind, w· "-t •. ey'r£> ,-:>; " .. o v.

0\1, l. f t y .., C. •

.t I oul," ~c b ,..O J:r 1 -::.o hnek on th.

• tana •,d t<>

fJ.ci l ·o

b'li t. 1 c.,.,.,tf'c.1 C".

'l'h s cc,. "

0 H ).1, t' .... ·e tb f l ~r·t w 1n~s to

c-.11 r l;c 0 _c l~k~ t_ ; , i:, , : , ,me t . Do1ice

off:ic r dS,' t t ··od?

m. l{I d I K: e_ , b· op n 0 • orpoi:t n·ty

<:or ·i g d~~c "'V ... y { [, 'I.tic in e .I t ..:- l n, to

!·now, u d r o· h, \h t t. ,, fie r i<i C'O to .. v.

Q ... C r .. C .n e •Cs C'<

) i:t, t ' r r 1- ta C' 0 .it, You-.; flor-or.

0 • t ~h t bi:. th -the 1·ay I

't

0 ;,) T n C you n <JC"C d i:10..,itions of

Page 48: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

47

the government 's wi. tnecsos?

MR, KE~"DnICR: That's certainly tru~ in civil ca~es,

and - -

Q Nell, I'm talking about criminal c:t'lcc.

MR. KEND:.Ucr:: I know you ore. I'll just ho.ve to say

I don't have a t:hno:::e•1 ou it. I'n, not. cnt.i.rel/ sure of that.

Q !"ell, ao'JU.-ne that i. n' t t:o, dnd --

MR. KE,;r)iUCK: J\l l right.

Q ··- ard you w&'lt ~-o c.::11. the- chi~f of police.

MR. I<IlT,l)RlCI(: Jut he ro;iy go

Q He's be~n :maer cubpoeni: by t.' ie s tatc, it comes

to tr ·.al and ':h St tc h:1' chosen not t-o pu"i:: him on. So th<!

defenclant asks the, ccu~t:: • •, :,uld like to put him en and

tre&t him ar.. a ho itilr witne.:s; ,nd the court: :::::iy~, Sorry,

if you cull him, he's yc.t:r 11itne 'cl,

:m. ~E?ID"ICK: If 11 t. o £' thtn,.:; ax 3 done?

Q Yes.

1• •• ,, IID'>IC;:: d wh ~• t-•e question?

Q i: .10 ... .J · st; on i , i ":>l ron!ly Oon • t: know wh\:'rc

i-t~. IE I) rc.r z Ho you don't: know whore you st;md on

Q 1'nd th t tt • ,;:i,.se in this ca~e; thct wci.s

'!' •·'" lDRI"" • I c·o.1 't rcn:rMbcr that all of those ,- . . ...... "'"

Page 49: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

things were ·.;rre: i:bcu': hi. having i,;; en '"Ubpoc.11 ed ac --

Q The chief \1,•s lnder ubpo na by tJ-,e Sto'C.e, he

had.,'t testified, i.o a,ik~cl the court ~o let him cross-

examine, who said: No, if you cal ... hi,:i, he's your witness.

~m. Y..ENDlUCK: Yes, thil.\:. • n tight. If he ha~ called

him, he would have been tho uitnq"~ of tho dei'e;;,dant.

But we don't c:oncode ~a'.: that:. in any way dc,nies

this defendant of his Fo~rteen~h.

imd may I just

Q ·1e.:.1, .:h::: fact is, the, •'l, i'.lln - 1e t cl l ,

so t · rc"ls can't :mo; wr, t wi t:.n s , ,u' ,inq to c t 1at

yo 1' r o · .. ng- ....... j k -: ll"rig, • a l _c, ,g to s-y ,,_. ho.1

ti •YI 9 J. ·" hol vp under . • a ,·ri" ._icn?

> ...... 'nt . cw t- "'o l , ...~le tv

io,{: :r: '1 i-i < -I • ( ' y u m k Fl spot

l' r u g i: ,.. ,;;,J r,a ... .1.l 'r ;oing to Cell •omo

' 'l . l,; I '1 gi~ ?f c.l JIC • Ana .i. don't know

r • I 1y t.1- . 'Dd, n i~ cu ..... ..:oulC:: rot h;:·ve

in V t ' . • -o: yl:. • l if he l~""lt "d to, ;;,rio'"

to t * ~-,... !4't". r l k . ' or .. .. y·u n n• . r tc an

~rl i. :>n " l t i C .,o_.ic .... offic r C • •

h· r r .y t '1 r ,d 'lt r h :1 : '-' r l tl t L 01,;. '1 vu • •

, ;t ') h t ., • J.PJ"' i:in't

Page 50: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

49

might not haw be n rscallcd?

MR. • NDn .. CK: 'l'o al lo 1 him .:o e r c ::. - cd to ·1e

s t o.nd , after he once h~c testiC"cd,

Q Yes .

l1R. I"':'.ND1'ICK: Jlnd, You.: Hono:::, • .y I -- t ,oe the

red light..

~:R. CUI 1 Jt;'l 'IC:, Ft' ,R• Your t·m~ i up, but you

m.iy dra;1 :l.t t.:, i'.l. conclur.i.on, 11: you so 1ir.h.

1.R. l<'. N:?R" CF.: WO'tl like. <-C C concl1.di11g

atater::ent, if i· Ol\ a ~ l "S ·h Co ~t.

IR. CBC ll C ~: 1 fr C tu 0 th·t.

Hn. i{ 'DRIC.,: h :, nt. .. ': ·- n

covered, rid .. ill' cov it • I .r '1

matter o:I: th St ... ,. r i n :.. . ' co ndc t -T C t h C'O ' . • t ' I i, holdin

.h .. C • l ll1 t h t . 'iti""ut -·on;

th C ¥ ·h tw cite

0 i to tr "fc~t t .at that

ri t 1;".8 c,, I- -- ·• t t.,.:it i!J really

l ., u t. h '"tcr a S·i:ato

t t:o 0'1 t .. ut 1 , ,n '1 not a 2ederal

• ~() ( <.) bP. C ,c w'th,

n .... 0 I I " , le. ) y <lay tb .. • ·i;h defendant

h 0' of 0 i' ;i 11 ·ty of ::his t.rt:i:h

in t ti lOny ~- , I w d l;t, CC1.-l .. ;.., i tb w rd" of

Page 51: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

50

Justico CarQo?.o, to keep the b~la.cc ttuc.

Thnnk you.

MP.. CI!!EF ,1USTI~ BURGER, Thru1}: you, I1r. l'.endri er.. Mr.. SUlillners.

REBUTTAL ARGu1-lEHT OJ:' JP.R~Y H. SIDiMERS, ESO. ,

ON BEHALF OP 'l'HE PET:.:'.i'IOHER

M.'1'1., SIJMl.fER/3: 11:-. Chie( Jur,tico, .::nd may it plea:.;""

the Cour·::

:r.n tho vary short tia: J. h V<l r" ainin~, .I wo11 'td lil;c

~o l lo~atc on "c; qu z ·.i.:,n

pc ·· n 0 cJ ~ton by tic Chief: yo tor ay. "'ho f · , t .

Justice in r g d tc, a ,u ion of o,.~ r of cof.

Ye· r Uo .., , e~':, J y • o 1

ah. 11ld h V ?ii , t'J"f r )!: p

s' bly .rfoc· .h"' • ht u•c.

I l O 1ld o,1ly " y ·11 '- n • '

qU:\. l a t:o IWhC'tl r I

co-r •..:, ·o ~lly.

in the st,;: c,f

'C • , ii.; ··" th ' if an , . . • :;t.i.nony is clu.1; d

or e tl.. wi :ne I' t ti 0 , xo11 ' , t .en i 3 , t

nece ~ff r of proof n er cu· 1 so t~

t . C, p .. an a. •

0 r t ?

" Er S: 't ? "i '; I sir.

0 to .) .... n ·" o. p o, ?

" : b ~t h o.i.scrction of

C' t • ' C. •• n :ln t, C criminal - n

Page 52: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

court which o:..lows you to •k a ~nth criminal cou ca they

have i:.llowod you to rnaJ; an offc o »roof. But that <'ic.ciaion

ean:e aft r thi. ca <a W!IS tried.

In regard to Mr. Ju~ticc Fe nquist's question

yeoterday, I believe th.:it, in discu..: Lon, the terms "rf" ,t1'.;tal"

and "surrebuttnl • goi; ju.nbled up, and I t·ould like to -..uy that

it is my conten:ion urd r the 1 w ~ht th- sco~e that the

eefcndant, ii hews not allo,cd to t~ctiiy 'c!ld put on oth~r

r1itneDses, tho Sta ·o th n i?Ut on r<>' 1-:.l:al witn ,;sc~ to estify,

to rebut his ,·itncs , th•t he co1 d ti t1fy s

witnesc.

. rr •J n:.ta·

But t!l

t,.'\os t+:e ' "1.i.

t. l.

. ., , "-

,

he io

,

~copa of i:i s b t ")U l'ni'!: d t:o

. 'h n I:. , n o· t s

y th t h 10 " .nt \;le pro:,1em

1 ,: bu't 1 i:.ncss,

·t. C rt inly s ould ba

4 •

i ·t , t- . g, r, 'i;O Mr, Justice

.. p .i ri' •g st: rda,,, if th., court

n i ut on , it ould be the

' o ~' .:; ,.. u-:-t, h

0 • C l t' \

r.:i

c..,ubt, under

h rrnle,;s

_ n nd r,oth ing •an be

Page 53: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

52

u1ore prejudicial them a statute which will re!;•.:r.i ct or <10ny a

defendant from ·tcstify:i.ng .in hi3 o~;n 'l)ehalr, and tha'.: this

statute is, par ae, prejudicial.

We say that the defendant has a right ·::o ~cs-;:i:i:y

under the authority of -- nn absolute righ-:; unde:.- F(lrg•1son vs.

Georgia, ana, .i.n cloa;i.ng, I ,muld r.c::;pc,::tft l ly · a1 that we

think that --

Q Do you think tn~t• w1'a:: FcrqVSOl" held? Thclt --- -you h ... vc a con:iti t1..t.i.on 11 ri 1h _ t<- ttoi:l:ify '

I J: c:.. t -- br i ,· ic·t.·'on, .. ha.: was

the w ·y that I read \:Iv, 6.cc".s'.or i.1 th;.,.

Q I tncuqht it. w, • - .ight o cotnzcl.

, n. StlMMEf.C; Ye ,, y, , :It U: •

t.lv t , a · tll in crpi; tn·. icn - · + !1 , • • ~r,: yir.,J .c 1.won t:c th" s

caue, tn t Co1.ul<.. '1. 0~.,; n s , • ·• ol,..t- r ... 'I.: to t.c ti"y ir

cx·minal en 0. And tr t.J ..;ta t o" t ct,·· o of Tcm.~::..;cc

~· I.

pr.

Th • :o . .. ~n elf) '1_, I c-- lln

., . ·' n --n ciCccl, '·.hici1,

.... ( i- ':. , o ,~ _,,,.. c, ;; Ju<"':I '-!clU l ·.c c ::: , we t'1i11k

.. n. j .1 o ch to .h~ problem •

tllC' t t 'l. '! 'l CC:, l ti -:ut .:..onl',l.

0 .. C 16 or, qu B

n . cl i t 1 ., c,1 ta i')'ht a • >nstih1~.c.l' l r'')'h\: to

Page 54: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

53

testify on behalf of the def nd nt. Su oac the defendnnt,

at the openi1,9 of the ca5o aft r tho iu1."Y wa'l elected, the

defendant.' s counacJ. said: "l,ou, b_fcre the ninds of the ju:-:y

are CjUnnum, infl'.lencEld by the pr-:isecu~.ion 's te:stimony, I wct,ld

like an oppo1:tunity to put my cicfc-,1dant, t.he accused, on t.he

stand, to have him tell his ~~o~-y to ~hin jury."

l7ould you think h" wou ... d . •10 on ,.b-.-.>lute right as

part of his absolute i:ight to teDt'l.fy, t' a'. you c3 ai•~, to bl")

heard firnt bofore t State i heard fro ,

.1R, SUlll,lERS t · ,i, 1, '! C ':) •ot, le r on-:>t', .1. r C •

~ully ny th-t --

0

1 "lp ul t' t: j -1 ? t

• : YOl'":

r ' ')

O • V , n

(J .h i,., r

h,t i• V •

th op 1

MR. C' ' . You

l t 1 ny ·r :, "10

h "' " h i1 cl ) pt'

r n th I

.! t

t

I" l: -

or L •

' • C -,

... ., , i

H~'lO;>', i

l ,;;ay, l.

- l C'

tt-i

h, C ic11t l

'

it ir c;ht l:>o o vcrv

hl to qc';. to

cution wit e~s~s.

no, b. cau:i

r i:.u e~n of prOl)f

·t .: ; you • uggest

1J,11 'C? ha

- fir'""'?

n h. t t f

h i.:r al C'ln

Q -- unt'l •

c'sicn quit

th .. d by t e

Page 55: ORIGINAL - Supreme Court of the United States · 3/21/1972  · 4 the United ri·nte':l Con11titucio,1. Now, thi'J question, th€ ntot~te irvolvc-d in thin particul!r mattr,r, mlG

;,,4

manner in which the Sta~c ic prov~ng; /lllQ I qay it ould bL a

very infrequent cnse in which I wculd put r y c _ic,n~ o , becau::.G

we co not have full disco•1c;.--y in the tal of' mennecs a, ,m

are ve1.-y limited .i.n crimin l p;;:cccdur". J\nd I • ·ould be vary

hesitent to put my client on the r';nnd, i.:o :.i!l the procccutio,1,

There might be a very r r.e cace 11 t,hich it miqh b3, cuch as

... raal:.ter of incest, in wh i.ch th r rould 1:,-. unco ·roborated

test... on; of · cco pl ce, cJ '•h ft < , c. ry , ak co.se.

ut i. oul i very reluct nt , ri~l coun l ··o

oy such t ~tic, b ~user ca ore

' .- ad y.

I • C 1 e Jt:S • ,r, • '. , o.

rr,h le VO' , l r. : ric.

~ho cas is ot 1i:

( n er t' t 10:~? o' 1 c,, a. ,

• J