painting and visual information processing · human vision comprises central and peripheral vision,...
TRANSCRIPT
News & Views
Painting and visual information processing
Rong-Ding He • Rong-Qiao He
Published online: 3 December 2016
� Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Paintings are creative ways of touching human vision and
awaken certain feelings from the depths of the heart. In
terms of science, these deep feelings result from our visual
information processing. To achieve this effect, painters
intentionally or unintentionally follow the principles of
vision and psychology in which the brain network is
extremely complicated [1, 2]. In fact, a masterpiece
painting equals an excellent piece of visual art; that is to
say, an outstanding painter is a visual expert.
The surrealist Salvador Dalı́ was a skilled draftsman,
best known for the striking and bizarre images in his work.
His best-known work, Persistence of Memory, shows his
thoughts on indelible memory, with clocks deformed in a
surrealistic manner, which presents a challenge to the
visual science principle of visual invariance [3]. Visual
invariance is described as follows: objects can be rotated,
stretched, squeezed, or otherwise distorted and yet remain
recognizable to human vision (Fig. 1a). In Persistence of
Memory, Dali bends the clocks but we still recognize them
as clocks, and not as something else (Fig. 1b). However, if
he had gone beyond the limit of bending and instead folded
the clocks, we would not be able to identify them as clocks.
Thus, he is good at handling the deformation, conforming
to the visual invariance principle, and allowing us to
recognize the items for what they are, even when they
appear visually to be different. His surrealistic expressions
and deep thoughts are established with the appropriate
application of visual invariance.
Human vision comprises central and peripheral vision,
organized in a rhombic-like visual field [4]. Peripheral
vision is just as important as central vision although we
clearly see every object with our central vision (Fig. 1c)
[5]. As shown in Fig. 1d, peripheral vision can concave an
object at the nasal side [6]. The Portrait of Dora Maar
(Fig. 1e) painted by Pablo Picasso (1937) is one of the
world’s aesthetic masterpieces [7]. Picasso painted the
Portrait with thick lines, a clear-cut structure, and in bright
color, which allows us to perceive a vivid Dora. He gives
Dora an extended nose and cheek to compensate for the
concaved effect of peripheral vision, although the spatial
resolution is poor in the peripheral vision. With a master’s
talent, Picasso has painted a portrait on a 2D plane that
appears illusively full and has a 3D-like appearance in the
peripheral vision. This is evidence that peripheral vision
can result in the illusory perception of a normal object,
depending upon the structure of that visual object.
Wheatfield with Crows was painted in July 1890 in the
final weeks of van Gogh’s life. This masterpiece depicts a
dramatic, cloudy sky filled with crows over a wheat field.
The sense of isolation is heightened by a central path
leading nowhere and by the uncertain direction of the
crows’ flight. van Gogh painted the flying crows with thick
black lines (Fig. 2a), which makes them appear as if they
are really flying with their flapping wings.
To understand why the crows appear to be really flying,
we need to know the pathways that are projected from the
retinae to the visual cortex. The human visual system is
composed of three anatomically distinct parallel pathways
projecting from the magnocellular, parvocellular, and
Electronic supplementary material The online version of thisarticle (doi:10.1007/s11434-016-1210-z) contains supplementarymaterial, which is available to authorized users.
R.-D. He
Fine Art College, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
R.-Q. He (&)
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute
of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,
China
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Sci. Bull. (2016) 61(23):1775–1778 www.scibull.com
DOI 10.1007/s11434-016-1210-z www.springer.com/scp
koniocellular ganglion cells to the lateral geniculate
nucleus, and via these to the primary visual cortex V1. The
thick lines used by van Gogh to depict the crows at least
conformed to the phenomenon of lateral inhibition in visual
neurobiology [8]. Lateral inhibition is the capacity of an
excited neuron to reduce the activity of its neighbors,
which makes the darker area falsely appear even darker and
the lighter area falsely appear even lighter (Fig. 2b). This
effect creates a contrast in stimulation that allows increased
sensory perception. Magno cells with more myelin are
activated by achromatic low spatial frequencies, and have
high contrast sensitivity and temporal resolution with a
high conduction velocity (Table S1). The magnocellular
pathway is sensitive to movement and velocity. The thick
lines used by van Gogh to depict the flying crows stimulate
the magnocellular pathway and give the reader the per-
ception that the crows are flying over the wheat field.
In contrast, the painting Irises in Monet’s Garden by
Claude Monet shows the lush opulence of irises, shrubs,
overhanging trees, and patchwork light (Fig. 2c). He did
not use line drawing to depict the boundaries between the
flowers, trees, and other objects, but instead used a varie-
gated patchwork to obscure the boundaries. The magno-
cellular visual pathway is not sensitive to the irises without
boundaries. The lush opulence of the irises should stimu-
late the parvocellular pathway in which the cells are small
with less myelin, are color-opponent (so-called red/green)
[9], have low contrast sensitivity, are high spatial, have low
temporal resolution, and have low conduction velocity
[10]. The painting of the Irises gives us the impression that
Fig. 1 (Color online) Paintings by talented artists always conform to visual psychological principles. a Visual invariance. The three objects may
well be recognized as the same box with a hole in it, even though the visual shapes are different (from DCMs, http://changingminds.org). b In
Persistence of Memory painted by Salvador Dali in 1931 (from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), the clocks were strikingly deformed. The bent
clocks express the author’s surrealistic imagination on persistent memory. This painting skill challenges the visual invariance principle.
c Peripheral vision. The human visual field is composed of the central and peripheral fields [4]. Please observe the fixation point and perceive the
circle with the peripheral vision. d The peripheral vision perceives a circle as concave. e Dora Maar painted by Pablo Picasso in 1937 (from
Allposter.com, order#: 1001201666985). The portrait shows a normal, beautiful, vivid, and 3-dimensional-like Dora when anyone fixes his/her
eyes on the fixation point and perceives Dora face in the peripheral vision
1776 Sci. Bull. (2016) 61(23):1775–1778
123
Monet’s garden is silent, relaxed, comfortable, and more
imaginative, at the moment when we observe the master-
piece. Furthermore, there is no horizon to our visual field
and this perpetuates the abiding impressionist ambition of
harmonizing the spatial depth and surface.
Different people may have different perceptions and
feelings when they observe these global masterpieces
because their understanding of these paintings is based on
different backgrounds [11], such as language, culture,
society, and history [12]. Each of the paintings has its own
specific style and stimulates the magno-, carvo-, or konio-
cellular pathway, or all three. Further perception to
understand the deeper meaning of a painting is not only
related with visual cortex but also the other cortexes. In
addition, health conditions also influence visual percep-
tion. Ahmadi et al. found that dyslexic subjects capacity
suffer from both magnocellular and parvocellular deficits
as well as partial impairment of the koniocellular pathway.
Neurodegenerations including Alzheimer’s [13] and
Parkinson’s disease [14] may be associated with deficits in
brain function [15]. In any case, it is imperative to
understand and follow the visual and psychological prin-
ciples in painting. Otherwise, it is difficult for the painting
to elicit a response from the deep mind of the audience.
Fig. 2 Different painting skills stimulate different visual information processing pathways. a Wheatfield with Crows (van Gogh, 1890, from
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). He used thick black lines to paint the crows, which look like living crows flying over the wheat field. b Lateral
inhibition. This makes the darker area falsely appear even darker and the lighter area falsely appear even lighter, along the boundary between
adjacent shades of grey in the Mach band illusion. In Wheatfield with Crows, the thick black lines stimulate the magnocellular pathway, to create
a perception of crows flying. This moving effect is at least related with lateral inhibition. c Irises in Monet’s Garden painted by Claude Monet in
1890 (from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) is in a different style from that of Wheatfield with Crows. There is a variegated patchwork, but no
rims with dark lines between the flowers and trees. This painting style can stimulate the parvocellular visual pathway and awaken feelings of
silence, relaxation, comfort, and thoughtfulness in its viewers. d Facing the variegated patchwork, a person could not perceive the imaging of the
Mach band. This is why the flowers and trees in Irises in Monet’s Garden look silent and motionless. The three anatomically distinct parallel
pathways projecting from the magnocellular, parvocellular, and koniocellular ganglion cells to the lateral geniculate nucleus, and through there to
the primary visual cortex V1. These sub-systems have distinct structural and spatiotemporal characteristics
Sci. Bull. (2016) 61(23):1775–1778 1777
123
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
References
1. Zhang J, Cheng W, Liu Z et al (2016) Neural, electrophysio-
logical and anatomical basis of brain-network variability and its
characteristic changes in mental disorders. Brain 139:2307–2321
2. Jiang TZ (2014) Brainnetome and related projects. Sci China Life
Sci 57:462–466
3. Lindeberg T (2013) Invariance of visual operations at the level of
receptive fields. PLoS ONE 8:e66990
4. He RD, He RQ (2014) What did the bronze eye-like prism tell us?
Sci China Life Sci 57:445–447
5. Bi TY, Cai P, Zhou TG et al (2009) The effect of crowding on
orientation-selective adaptation in human early visual cortex.
J Vis 9:1–10
6. He RD, Su T, Yang Y et al (2016) To perceive a perfect Dora
Maar in peripheral vision. Sci China Life Sci 59(6):640–642
7. Brigitte L (1996) Portraits of Dora Maar, Picasso and Portraiture.
Harry N Abrams Inc, New York, pp 395–396
8. Bear MF, Connors BW, Paradiso MA (2007) The somatic sen-
sory system, neuroscience exploring the brain, 3rd edn. Lippin-
cott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 399
9. Ahmadi K, Pouretemad HR, Esfandiari J et al (2015) Psy-
chophysical evidence for impaired magno, parvo, and konio-
cellular pathways in dyslexic children. J Ophthalmic Vis Res
10:433–440
10. Yoonessi A, Yoonessi A (2011) Functional assessment of magno,
parvo and konio-cellular pathways; current state and future
clinical applications. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 6:119–126
11. Bao Y, Yang T, Lin X et al (2016) Aesthetic preferences for
eastern and western traditional visual art: Identity matters. Front
Psychol 20:1596
12. Song M, Wang JJ, Jiang TZ (2015) How the coevolution of
language and sociality has helped to shape the human brain. Sci
China Life Sci 58:927–928
13. Lu J, Li T, He RQ et al (2014) Visualizing the microtubule-as-
sociated protein Tau in the nucleus. Sci China Life Sci 57:422–431
14. Armstrong RA (2015) Oculo-visual dysfunction in Parkinson’s
disease. J Parkinsons Dis 5:715–726
15. Sannita WG, Carozzo S, Orsini P et al (2009) ‘Gamma’ band
oscillatory response to chromatic stimuli in volunteers and
patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Vis Res 49:726–734
1778 Sci. Bull. (2016) 61(23):1775–1778
123