pamela schmitt united states naval academy. game theory review payoff matrix review definition and...

25
Exploring Nash Equilibria Without Dominant Strategies Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy

Upload: keegan-hirons

Post on 15-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Exploring Nash Equilibria Without Dominant Strategies

Pamela SchmittUnited States Naval Academy

Page 2: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Game TheoryREVIEW payoff matrixREVIEW definition and determination of

dominant strategiesNASH EQUILIBRIA with dominant strategiesNASH EQUILIBRIA without dominant

strategies (cover and underline best response method)

Applications: Oligopolies, Prisoner dilemma (suboptimal outcomes), Battle of the Sexes, Chicken, Hotelling's Beach

Page 3: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

The Payoff Matrix: Dominant Strategy Equilibrium

Left Right

Top 4,7 5, 8

Bottom 2, 1 3, 6

Danny

Lily

Page 4: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

The “row” player Lily Lily has two strategies “Top” and “Bottom”

Left Right

Top 4, 7 5, 8

Bottom 2, 1 3, 6

Danny

“row”Lily

Page 5: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

The “column” player Danny Danny has two strategies “Left” and “Right”

Left Right

Top 4, 7 5, 8

Bottom 2, 1 3, 6

“column” Danny

Lily

Page 6: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

The Payoff MatrixThe first number in each cell is the payoff the

row player (Lily) receives if both players choose the action that leads to that cell.

Similarly, the second number in each cell is the payoff the column player (Danny) receives.

Page 7: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

If Lily chooses “Top”: Lily earns 4 if Danny chooses “Left” and 5 if Danny chooses “Right”

Left Right

Top 4, 7 5, 8

Bottom 2, 1 3, 6

Danny

Lily

Page 8: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

If Lily chooses “Bottom”: Lily earns 2 if Danny chooses “Left” and 3 if Danny chooses “Right”

Left Right

Top 4, 7 5, 8

Bottom 2, 1 3, 6

Danny

Lily

Page 9: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Dominant strategiesA dominant strategy is the best strategy

regardless of what the other player chooses.

If both players have a dominant strategy, the outcome is a dominant strategy equilibrium.

All dominant strategy equilibrium are Nash Equilibrium.

Page 10: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Lily has a dominant strategy: choosing Top always leads to a higher payoff regardless of what Danny chooses: 4>2 and 5>3

Left Right

Top 4, 7 5, 8

Bottom 2, 1 3, 6

Danny

Lily

Page 11: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Dominant strategiesBut not all Nash Equilibrium are

dominant strategy equilibrium.

A Nash Equilibrium is the outcome in which neither player has a desire to choose a different strategy given the choice of the other player. (mutual best responses)

Page 12: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Let’s try it with AP questions

Page 13: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Let’s try it with AP questions

Page 14: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Let’s try it with AP questions

Page 15: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Let’s try it with AP questions

Page 16: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Let’s try it with AP questions

Page 17: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Note: Neither has a dominant strategy.

Page 18: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

But, we can now answer (a): if Red Shop chooses “South” Blue Mart chooses “North” (1 pt). b/c 4000>1000 (1 pt.)

Page 19: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

And for (b): “South” is not a dominant strategy for Red Shop chooses (1 pt.) If Blue Mart chooses south, Red Shop is better off choosing north. (Red Shop’s best response depends on Blue Mart’s move.) (1 pt.)

Page 20: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Part (c): the highest combined payoff are at (S,N): (5,000 +4,000) > 6,5000 > 2,7000,> 2,500. (1 pt.) Stating that Red Shop chooses south and Blue Mart chooses north

Page 21: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Part (d) redraw such that +$2,000 are added to “South” payoffs

North South

North 900, 1800 3000,5500

South 7000,4000

3500, 3000

Blue Mart

Red Shop

Page 22: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

http://gametheory.tau.ac.il/When teaching game theory, I prefer to have students start

with their own intuition.

Ariel Rubinstein has an online resource that allows teachers to use simple games (and more complex ones!) to build this intuition.

This is following Rubinstein, A. (1999). “Experience from a Course in Game Theory: Pre- and Post-class Problem Sets as a Didactic Device” Games and Economic Behavior 28, 155 – 170.

Page 23: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

http://gametheory.tau.ac.il/

Page 24: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA
Page 25: Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy. Game Theory REVIEW payoff matrix REVIEW definition and determination of dominant strategies NASH EQUILIBRIA

Basic Attacker/Defender GameTwo Person/Binary Decision Game of Strategy

Multi-Site Attacker/Defender GameNew! Defaults Implement a Simple Profiling Game

CentipedeAlternating Two-person "Pass or Take" Game

CoordinationMinimum-Effort Game, with Incentive Pay Options

Guessing Game With Incentive to Guess Others' Decisions

2x2 Matrix Game Prisoner's Dilemma, Battle of Sexes, etc.

Asymmetric Matrix Game"Large" Setup, e.g. Coordination with 7 Effort Choices

Symmetric Matrix GameNxN Matrix Game with Symmetric Payoffs

Security Coordination GameCoordination of Security Investment Decisions

Traveler's DilemmaSocial Dilemma with No Dominant Strategy

2-Stage Game Generic Two-Stage Extensive-Form Game

View Results View Results of Any Prior Setup

Vecon Lab Games