pan london practice learning group

49
Developing London's Future Nurses Together Supported by Pan London Practice Learning Group Practice Supervisor Workshop

Upload: others

Post on 28-Mar-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Pan London Practice Learning GroupSupported by
Practice Supervisor Workshop
© PLPLG 2019
responsibilities
To be aware of how to assess learning needs and set learning
objectives
To understand how to give effective feedback
To identify different skills required and the basics of coaching
Aims and Learning Outcomes
© PLPLG 2019
Changes to the NMC
Effective 28th January 2019
Changes to student preparation
Changes to standards for supervision and assessment of students in placement
Pan-London Practice Assessment Document (PAD) will take effect September 2019
New roles and responsibilities
© PLPLG 2019
Designed to work across all programmes and settings
Flexible however must fulfil the NMC standards
Students must be supported to learn in practice
May include supernumerary status for students
Level of supervision depends on needs of individual students and may decrease in line with confidence and competences
Appropriate adjustments should be made in accordance with human rights legislation
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
assessment
© PLPLG 2019
© PLPLG 2019
Each student may have several different practice supervisors (including other healthcare professionals)
Practice assessors may supervise other students
Each student will have an allocated practice assessor for the placement (where summative assessment required)
Each student will have an academic assessor (required parts of programme)
Practice supervisor may not be practice assessor for the same student at the same time
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Practice Supervisor
Role model
Supports learning within scope of practice to enable student to meet proficiencies and outcomes
Provides feedback on progress
Contributes to student assessments
Raises concerns when appropriate (with support)
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Practice Assessor
Make and record objective, evidence-based assessments
Maintain current knowledge and expertise
Work in partnership with nominated academic assessor
Ensure sufficient opportunities to observe student in the setting
Gather and coordinate feedback on student performance
Have an understanding of the student’s learning and achievement
Collaborate with academic assessors at scheduled relevant points in programme
May not be practice supervisor and academic assessor for same student
Support learning in line with NMC standards
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
who is responsible for each activity
There may be more than one answer to some!
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Assessment
Contributes to Assessment of proficiencies based on scope of practice
Signs off Service User Feedback
Signs /completes off inter-professional working page
Practice Assessor
Final professional values per placement
Episode (s) of care
Completes OAR at end of each placement & at programme progression
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Academic Assessor
Confirm student achievement of proficiencies and programme outcomes in the academic environment
Make and record objective, evidence-based decisions
Maintain current knowledge and expertise
Works in partnership with a nominated practice assessor to evaluate and recommend the student for progression for each part of the programme,
Have an understanding of the student’s learning and achievement in practice
Collaborate with practice assessors at relevant points in programme structure
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Assessment Activity
Consider the following scenarios and for each identify who is the most appropriate person to deal with these:
A Learning Disabilities student nurse on placement is struggling with confidence issues
An adult student nurse on a general medical ward starts to re-sheath a needle after drawing up an antibiotic
A second year child student nurse on placement in the Children’s Emergency Department is struggling with drug calculations for their medicines management
A Mental Health student nurse on placement in CAMHS Eating Disorder unit has complained about being given an action plan on time-keeping
A first year student is coming towards end of placement and needs the PAD document signing off
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Initial Interview
Focus on getting to know the student
Carry out a SLOT analysis to identify student’s level of
knowledge, skills and experience
Set SMART learning objectives
© PLPLG 2019
SLOT analysis
© PLPLG 2019
Activity
Working in pairs, complete a SLOT analysis. One of you will be the
practice supervisor and the other will be the student
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
© PLPLG 2019
about this first
© PLPLG 2019
Prioritise learning needs for individual and placement
Consider preferred learning style and options
Identify appropriate activity
Determine the timeframe
Set SMART objective
© PLPLG 2019
SMART Objectives
Timebound
Example:
To attend the practice supervisor half day workshop
by the end of the month to develop skills to be
confident practice supervisor within six months
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
objective based on the SLOT completed and taking
account of their preferred learning style
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
What is Assessment?
Assessing is making an evaluation of student competence over a period of time
May involve different areas of competence including:
Skills and knowledge
Helps to improve performance and motivate a student
Assessment of students is against certain criteria or standards identified in the Pan London Practice Assessment Document
Assessment is not related to peer performance
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
setting objectives or
© PLPLG 2019
Presentation
© PLPLG 2019
evidence, including:
Student reflections during assessment
healthcare professionals)
© PLPLG 2019
Service User Feedback Considerations
Service users should not feel pressured to give feedback, positive or constructive. They may decline to participate
They should not feel responsible for any ultimate decision affecting a student’s progression (pass or fail)
Patients who may be too ill or vulnerable may not make an informed judgement
There may be concerns about anonymity
Service users may have preconceived ideas or different standards of what care should be
Some may not understand what is expected of them in terms of ‘feedback’
Some may feel it may be detrimental to their care if they provide negative feedback
They can be a bias in selection of service users
The standard template in the PLPAD should always be used
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Information we receive depends on effective
questioning
quality of information and help others to learn
Pace questions to avoid overloading a student
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
© PLPLG 2019
For each of the different types of question, consider one
example you could use when assessing a student
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
assessments and decisions made
Assessed against competencies in the PLPAD
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
© PLPLG 2019
Professional values
Practice Assessors must assess final
Students to complete reflection on one experience in practice and link to one section of NMC The Code - different sections
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
2 or 3 – record in OAR
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Inadequate feedback from colleagues, practice supervisors or service users
Bias towards student
Inappropriate method of assessment or not enough methods used
Student’s own readiness, preparation and/or nerves
Pre-conceived ideas based on other students’ performance
Uncertainty of documentation and completion requirements
Workload pressures
© PLPLG 2019
Which types of questions are most useful in
assessment?
assessment
© PLPLG 2019
What are the dos and don’ts?
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
DON’T
© PLPLG 2019
Johari Window
Known Self
Hidden Self
self
Joseph Luft and Harri Ingham, 1955
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
taught me all I knew.
Their names are What and Where and
When, How and Why and Who”
The Elephant’s Child
© PLPLG 2019
IAID Model
Input
• Identify the activity and consider both positive and negative behaviours
Activity
• Identify the impact of the action in terms of service and others
Impact
Desired Outcome
© PLPLG 2019
Coaching
Advising
Instructing
Counselling
Mentoring
© PLPLG 2019
another”
© PLPLG 2019
Definitions
Coaching – guiding someone to explore all potential options and decide on
a way forward
Advising – giving opinions or information which may or may not be taken,
generally based on own experience
Instructing – giving someone an instruction, telling them how to do
something
something that has already happened
Mentoring – combines elements of all of the above
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
© PLPLG 2019
have?
What experience do you have?
What would you like to develop?
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
How realistic is that for you currently?
What about short-term objectives?
How will you know when you have achieved it?
How may this impact on other areas?
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Which option appeals to you most? Why?
What is your commitment on a scale of 1 to 10?
What stops you reaching 10?
What is your timeframe?
How can I support you?
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
How is it going?
Are you where you planned to be in terms of achievement?
Have you encountered any problems? And if so, how have you overcome these?
What has gone / is going well?
What you have learned from the process?
How satisfied are you with the outcome?
Developing London's Future Nurses Together
© PLPLG 2019
Cox, D. (2013). The Hungry Manager. London: Amazon
Kolb. D. A. and Fry, R. (1975) Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. in C. Cooper (ed.), Theories of Group Process, London: John Wiley.
Lewis, L. (2005). I keep six honest serving-men. The Elephant’s Child retrieved from http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poems_serving.htm
Luft, J.; Ingham, H. (1955). The Johari window, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness. Proceedings of the western training laboratory in group development. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles
Whitmore, J (1992). Coaching for performance: GROWing human potential and purpose: the principles and practice of coaching and leadership. People skills for professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Nicholas Brealey
www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/education-standards/student-supervision- assessment.pdf