part 10 itaac and proposed license conditions revision1 update tracking report revision 2 · 2012....

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application

Part 10

ITAAC and Proposed License Conditions Revision1

Update Tracking Report

Revision 2

May 5, 2011

Revision History

Revision Date Update Description - 11/20/2009 COLA Revision 1 Transmittal

See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09074 Date 11/20/2009

- 10/19/2009 Updated Section: Appendix A.5 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09055 Date 10/19/2009 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 50


- 11/5/2009 Updated Section: 3 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09061 Date 11/5/2009 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 71

- 11/13/2009 Updated Section: Appendix A.1, Appendix A.2, Appendix A.3 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09065 Date 11/13/2009 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 81, 82, 83

- 11/18/2009 Updated Section: 2, 3, Appendix B.1 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09072 Date 11/18/2009 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 70, 78

0 12/8/2009 Updated Sections: Appendix A.1, A.2, A.3, A.4 Incorporated the response to RAI No.83

1 1/8/2010 Updated Section Appendix A.1, A.2

- 2/22/2010 Updated Section: 3 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-10010 Date 2/22/2010 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 132

- 3/5/2010 Updated Section: 3 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-10019 Date 3/5/2010 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 70 Supplemental

- 8/9/2010 Updated Section: 2, 3 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-10056 Date 8/9/2010 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 169

- 9/16/2010 Updated Section: Appendix 1 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-10064 Date 9/16/2010 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 70 Supplemental

- 10/6/2010 Updated Section: Appendix A.1, A.3 See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-10067 Date 10/6/2010 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 174


- 4/11/2011 Updated Section: Appendix C See Luminant Letter no. TXNB-11025 Date 4/11/2011 Incorporated responses to following RAIs: No. 211

2 5/5/2011 Updated Section Appendix A.1, A.2, A.3, A.4, A.5, A.6, Appendix B, Appendix C

1‐1

Tracking Report Revision List

Change ID No. Section ITAAC Rev.1 Page *

Reason for change

Change Summary Rev. of

T/R

RCOL2_ 11.05-2

Appendix A.5

29 Response to RAI No. 50 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-09055 Date 10/19/2009

Newly added Appendix A.5.

-

RCOL2_14.03.03-1

Appendix A.1 Table A1-1 (Sheet 1 of 6)

9 Response to RAI No.56 TXNB-09058 Date 10/26/2009

Revised 2.a and split into two new ITAAC (2.a.i and 2.a.ii)

-

RCOL2_14.03.03-2



Revised 2.b and split into two new ITAAC (2.b.i and 2.b.ii)

-

RCOL2_14.03.03-3

Appendix A.1 Table A1-1 (Sheet 2, 3 of 6)

10,11 Response to RAI No.56 TXNB-09058 Date 10/26/2009

ITAAC items 3.a and 3.b were revised to state “a report exists”

-

RCOL2_14.03.03-4



Revised ITAAC item 5.b to include new ITA and AC 5.b.i and 5.b.ii.

-

RCOL2_13.04-1 3 5 Response to RAI No.71 TXNB-09061 Date 11/5/2009

Added the Groundwater Monitoring Program as a Licensing Condition.

-


Added the Primary-to-Secondary Leakage Monitoring Program as a License Condition.

-


Added the Highly Radioactive Fluid Systems Outside Containment Monitoring Program as a License Condition.

-

RCOL2_13.03-2 RCOL2_13.03-8

2.6 4 Response to RAI No. 78 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-09066 Date 11/12/2009

Added Emergency Planning Action – See RAI# 70

-

1‐2


Reason for change


T/R

RCOL2_14.03.07-1

Appendix A.1 Table A.1-1 (Sheet 1 of 6)

8 Response to RAI No.81 Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09065 on 11/13/2009

ITAAC Item 1.b in Table A.1-1 has been revised to be consistent with the DCD Tier 1 revision

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-3

Appendix A.1 Table A.1-1 (Sheet 3 of 6), Appendix A.2 Table A.2-1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

10, 20 Response to RAI No.81 Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09065 on 11/13/2009

Revised ITAAC items 5.a. ITAAC item 5.b already revised to reflect answer in

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-4

Appendix A.1, Table A.1-1 (Sheet 5 of 6), Appendix A.2 Table A.2-1 (Sheet 2 of 2)


ITAAC Item 6.b in Table A.1-1 and Item 3.b in Table A.2-1 have been revised to be consistent with the similar ITAAC in DCD Tier 1.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-5



ITAAC Item 7 in Table A.1-1 has been revised to refer to Table A.1-2

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-6

Appendix A.1 Table A.1-1 (Sheet 6 and of 7) Table A.1-2, Appendix A.2 Table A.2-2

13, 15, 16, 21, 23

Response to RAI No.81 Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09065 on 11/13/2009

Table A.1-1 ITAAC Items 9.b, 10.b, and Table A2.1 ITAAC Item 5.b have been revised to be consistent with the DCD template for “PSMS Control.” Table A.1-2 and Tables A.2-2 have added a PSMS Control column.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-7

Appendix A.1, Table A.1-1 (Sheet 7 of

14, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24

Response to RAI No.81 Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09065

Table A.1-3 “MCR/RSC Control” entries Table A.2-1, ITAAC Item 6

-

1‐3


Reason for change


T/R

7) Table A.1-3, Appendix A.2 Table A.2-1 (Sheet 2 of 2) Table A.2-3

on 11/13/2009 Table A.2-1, ITAAC Item 7 Table A.2-2 includes the temperature indicators for the UHS pump houses. Table A.2-3 has been revised to be consistent with DCD Table A.2-3 temperature indicators have been deleted

RCOL2_14.03.07-8



ITAAC item 13 has been revised to indicate that the basins are part of the UHS system.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-9



Language corrections -

RCOL2_14.03.07-10



COLA Part 10, Table A.3-1, ITAAC Items 2.a and 2.b have been revised to address the design bases for protection against internal and external flooding.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-11



Table A.3-1, ITAAC Item 4 has been revised to specify the wall thickness by reference to the thicknesses indicated in Table A.3-2, thereby providing measurable acceptance criteria.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-12



Table A.3-1, ITAAC Items 6, 7, and 8 have been revised Also provides answer to RAI 82-3366, Question No. 14.03.07-19

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-14

Appendix A.1 Table A.1-1

14 Response to RAI No.82 Luminant Letter

ITAAC Item 14 in ITAAC Table A.1-1 has been revised into two ITAACs

-

1‐4


Reason for change


T/R

(Sheet 7 of 7)

no. TXNB-09065 on 11/13/2009

(14.a and 14.b)

RCOL2_14.03.07-15

Appendix A.2 Table A.2-1 (Sheet 2 0f 2)


ITAAC Table A.2-1 ITAAC Item 4 Design Commitment and acceptance criteria has been clarified

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-16



ITAAC Table A.2-1 ITAAC Item 5.a acceptance criteria have been clarified

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-17



ITAAC Item 5.a in Table A.3-1 has been revised to require documentation to demonstrate consistency

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-18



ITAAC Item 5.b in Table A.3-1 has been revised to require documentation to demonstrate consistency

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-19



Appendix A.3, Table A.3-1, ITAAC Item 8 acceptance criteria have been clarified

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-20



Appendix A.3, Table A.3-1, ITAAC Item 9 Inspections, Tests, Analyses (ITA) has been clarified

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-21



Table A.2-2 has been revised to add the UHS ESW pump house supply and exhaust backdraft dampers.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-22

Appendix A.1 Table A.1-1 (Sheet 4 of 6), Appendix A.2 Table A.2-1


Table A.1-1 ITAAC Item 6.a, and Table A.2-1 Item 3.a have been revised to be consistent with similar DCD ITAAC

-

1‐5


Reason for change


T/R

(Sheet 2 of 2)

RCOL2_14.03.07-27



The temperature switches in the last two columns of Table A.2-3 have been deleted. The revised ITAAC Table A.2-3 also incorporates the recommended changes for RAI 81-3293, Question No. 14.03.07-6.

-

RCOL2_13.03-1 2.6 4 Response to RAI No. 70 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-09072 Date 11/18/2009

Added Section “2.6 Emergency Planning Actions” and revised subsequent section numbers accordingly.

-

RCOL2_13.03-1 3 5 Response to RAI No. 70 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-09072 Date 11/18/2009

Added two proposed licensing conditions to the table in Section 3

-

RCOL2_13.03-15 Appendix B.1

38, 39 Response to RAI No. 78 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-09072 Date 1118/2009

Removed Table B-1 “EP ITAAC Not Required in CPNPP COLA” and associated text in Appendix B.1 Emergency Planning Section. Renamed Table B-2 to B-1.

-

RCOL2_13.03-15 Appendix B.1 Table B-1 (Sheet 1 of 37 through Sheet 37 of 37)

40-77 Response to RAI No. 78 Luminant Letter no. TXNB-09072 Date 11/18/2009

Incorporated elements of RAI response into Table B-1 “Emergency Plan Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria”

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

Appendix A.1

7 Response to RAI No. 83 Luminant Letter no.TXNB- 09065 Date 11/13/2009

Added Section A.1.1 Design Description.

0

1‐6


Reason for change


T/R

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

Appendix A.2



0

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

Appendix A.3



0

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

Appendix A.4



0

MAP-00-201 Appendix A.1 Table A.1-2 Table A.1-3 Appendix A.2 Table A.2-2 Table A.2-3 Figure A.2-1

12, 13, 18, 19, 20

The change of numbering rule of Tag number

Change Tag numbers 1

RCOL2_NONE-3 3 7 and 8 Response to RAI No.132 Luminant Letter No. TXNB-10010 Date 2/22/10

Revised Part 10, ITAAC and Proposed License Conditions to provide additional detail per NRC letter to NEI dated 12/2/09

-

RCOL2_13.03-2 3 Table of “Proposed License Condition”

4

Response to RAI No. 70 Supplemental Luminant Letter no.TXNB-10019 Date 3/05/2010

Added license condition (B) in table to develop site-specific Emergency Action Levels.

-

1‐7


Reason for change


T/R

RCOL2_10.02.03-2

2.3 3 Response to RAI No. 169 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-10056 Date 8/9/2010

Modified the description to make consistent with Section 3.

-

RCOL2_10.02.03-2

3

4 , 7 Response to RAI No. 169 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-10056 Date 8/9/2010

Added “COLA FSAR Subsection 10.2.3.5” to license condition. Added turbine inspection program and the implementation milestone in the table listing Operational Programs.

-

RCOL2_13.03-1 S02

Appendix 1 Emergency Action Levels

A1-i through A1-134

Supplemental Response to RAI No. 70 Luminant Letter no.TXNB-10064 Date 9/16/2010

Replaced the existing Appendix 1 in its entirety with a table identifying differences and deviations between the Comanche Peak Units 3 and 4 EALs and NEI 99-01, Revision 5.

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-29

Appendix A.1 Table A.1-1 (sheet 3 of 6)


ITAAC 5.b.ii reworded from “a report exists” to new language

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-29



ITAAC 7 reworded from “a report exists” to new language

-

1‐8


Reason for change


T/R

RCOL2_14.03.07-29



ITAAC 5.a, 5.b reworded from “a report exists” to new language

-

RCOL2_14.03.07-32



Modified language of ITAAC 2.a and 2.b from “a report exists” to “inspection of.”

-

RCOL2_14.03.12-5

Appendix C Table C-1 (Sheet 2 of 5)

78 Response to RAI No. 211 Luminant Letter No. TXNB-11025 Dated 04/11/2011

Added new physical security ITAAC 3.C.

-

RCOL2_14.03.12-5



Added new physical security ITAAC 11.C-2. Revised ITAAC 11.d to 11.c. Revised ITAAC 11.e to 11.d.

-

RCOL2_14.03.12-5



Added new physical security ITAAC 16.C-2.

-

CTS-01174

A.1.1 A.1.2

A.2.1 A.2.2 A.3.1 A.3.2 A.4.1 A.4.2

7 [9-12] 15 [24 , 25] 21 [33 , 34, 35] 27 [42, 43]

Consistency with DCD Revision 3 Tier 1

The changes in this section of the design description are: Text relocated within

subsection to align with the sequence and numbering of the corresponding DC in the ITAAC table.

Text edited for consistency between the Design Description (DD) and the Design Commitment (DC) in the ITAAC table.

Deleted redundant text.

2

1‐9


Reason for change


T/R

A.5.1 C.1 C.2

46 47 [86,87, 88]

Deleted text that is too detailed for COLA Part 10.

Deleted text that is inconsistent with SRP 14.3 guidance.

Editorial changes made for clarification and consistency.

Editorial changes made to correct grammatical error.

CTS-01174

Table A.1-1 Table A.2-1 Table A.3-1 Table A.4-1 Table A.5-1 Table B-1 Table C-1

8-11 [13-19] 16, 17 [26, 27 28] 22, 23 [36, 37, 38, 39] 28, 29 [44, 45 29 [46] 31 [ 50 through 85] 48 through 52 [89 through 95]


The changes in the ITAAC table are the following: Consistency between

DCD Tier 1 and R-COLA Part 10

Consistency between design description and acceptance criteria

Consistency between the Inspection, Test, and Analysis and the Acceptance Criteria.

Consistent reference to the Design Description

Consistent use of “a report exists”

Consistent use of “seismic Category I”

Consistent reference to Tables and Figures where applicable

Consistency with Tier 1 interface requirements.

Removed redundant ITAAC

Revised ITAAC to be consistent with latest SRP guidance.

2

CTS-01174

Table A.1-1 ITAAC # 15, 16, 17, 18.

11 [19]


Added ITAAC to meet the interface requirements described in DCD Tier 3 Section 3.

2

1‐10


Reason for change


T/R

CTS-01208 Table A.1-2 Table A.1-3 Figure A.1-1

12 [20, 21] 13 [22] 14 [23]

Consistency with FSAR Chapter 9

Added isolation valves between the ESWS discharge strainer backwash, UHS basin, and CWS blowdown main header consistent with FSAR.

2

CTS-01208 Table A.2-2 18 [29, 30]

Consistency with FSAR

Revised the fifth column to indicate “Remotely Operated Damper.”

2

CTS-01208 Table A.2-3 19 [31]


Changed unit heater equipment number consistent with FSAR.

2

CTS-01208

Figure A.2-1

20 [32]


Figure simplified to be consistent with FSAR.

2

CTS-01208 Table A.3-1 (sheet 2 of 4) #3

22 [37]


ITAAC was deleted because no penetrations in divisional walls exist.

2

CTS-01208 Table A.3-1 (Sheet 1 and 2 of 4) #2.b, #5.a, #5.b

22, 23 [36, 37]


ITAAC were deleted because barriers, penetrations, and doors are not credited for safety function

2

CTS-01174 Table A.3-1 (Sheet 3 and 4 of 4) #10

23 [38, 39]

Consistency with DCD Revision 3

Added ITAAC to address seismic fragilities task of the seismic margin analysis.

2

CTS-01208 Table A.3-2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

26 [41]


Revised concrete thickness to be consistent with FSAR

2

CTS-01208 Table A.5-2

39 [46]

Consistency with DCD Revision 3 and FSAR

Location of radiation monitors was added.

2

CTS-01174 Appendix A.6

[47] Consistency with DCD Revision 3

Added ITAAC for the fire protection interface identified in the DCD

2

1‐11


Reason for change


T/R

CTS-01174 Table B-1 (Sheet 6 through 11 of 36) #6, 8

31 [55-60]

Consistency with DCD Revision 3

The ITAAC for EOF and TSC were separated from DCD as site-specific.

2

*Page numbers for the attached marked-up pages may differ from the revision 1 page numbers due to text additions and deletions. When the page numbers for the attached pages do differ, the page number for the attached page is shown in brackets.

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4COL Application

Part 10 - ITAAC and Proposed License Conditions

Appendix A.1

Revision 19

PART 10 - APPENDIX A.1

ULTIMATE HEAT SINK SYSTEM (UHSS) AND ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER SYSTEM (ESWS) (PORTIONS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE CERTIFIED DESIGN)

A.1.1 Design Description

The ultimate heat sink system (UHSS) is a safety-related system that (1) removes heat from the essential service water system (ESWS) during normal operation, transients, accidents and design basis events, (2) provides the required cooling for a minimum of 30 days without make-up during all plant operating conditions including normal plant operations, abnormal and accident conditions, (3) provides water to the seismic stand pipe header of the fire protection system to assure manual fire suppression capability following a safe shutdown earthquake.

As shown in Figure A.1-1 and described in Table A.1-2, the major components of the UHSS are four 50 percent capacity mechanical draft cooling towers, one for each ESWS division, and four 33 1/3 percent capacity basins to satisfy the thirty day cooling water supply criteria. In addition, a UHS transfer pump is located in each UHS basin to enable water transfer between UHS basins during accident conditions.

The UHSS is capable of performing required safety functions assuming that one division is out of service for maintenance coincident with the postulated loss of offsite power and any single failure within the UHSS.

The essential service water is cooled by the UHS cooling tower before being returned to the UHS basin. Heat rejection to the environment is effected by direct contact of the hotter essential service water discharging from the ESWS with the UHS cooling tower forced airflow.

Upon the receipt of an ECCS actuation signal, all UHS cooling tower fans automatically start or continue to operate. Upon the receipt of an ECCS actuation signal or UHS basin low water level signal, the UHS basin blowdown control valves automatically close. A water level signal at six inches below the normal water level causes the makeup water control valve to open. A signal at normal water level then causes the makeup control valve to close.

The UHSS can supply at least 18,000 gallons of water to the seismic standpipe system via the ESWS if necessary for manual fire suppression following a safe shutdown earthquake (SSE).

1.a The functional arrangement of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) is as described in the Design Description of Section A.1.1 and as shown on Figure A.1-1.

1.b Each mechanical division of the UHSS and ESWS (Division A, B, C & D) is physically separated from the other divisions, except for the header portion

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

CTS-01174



Appendix A.1

Revision 110

of the transfer line piping, so as not to preclude accomplishment of the safety function.

2.a.i The ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in Table A.1-2, are fabricated, installed and inspected in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.a.ii The ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in Table A.1-2, are reconciled with the design requirements.

2.b.i The ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, is fabricated, installed, and inspected in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.b.ii The ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, is reconciled with the design requirements.

3.a Pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III components, identified in Table A.1-2, meet ASME Code Section III requirements for non-destructive examination of welds.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, meet ASME Code Section III requirements for non-destructive examination of welds.

4.a The ASME Code Section III components, identified in Table A.1-2, retain their pressure boundary integrity at their design pressure.

4.b The ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, retains its pressure boundary integrity at its design pressure.

5.a The seismic Category I equipment, identified in Table A.1-2, is can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

5.b The seismic Category I piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, can withstand seismic design basis loads without a loss of its safety function.

6.a The Class 1E components, identified in Table A.1-2, are powered from their respective Class 1E division.

CTS-01174



Appendix A.1

Revision 111

6.b Separation is provided between redundant divisions of Class 1E cables, and between Class 1E cables and non-Class 1E cables.

7. The UHSS is capable of removing the maximum design heat load transferred from the ESWS during normal plant operations, abnormal and accident conditions of the plant.

8. Controls are provided in the MCR to open and close the remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2.

9.a The remotely operated valves, identified in Table A.1-2 as having an active safey function perform an active safety function to change position as indicated in the table.

9.b The remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2 as having PSMS control perform an active safety function after receiving a signal from PSMS.

9.c After loss of motive power, the remotely operated valves, identified in Table A.1-2, assume the indicated loss of motive power position.

10.a Controls are provided in the MCR to start and stop the pumps and fans identified in Table A.1-3.

10.b The fans identified in Table A.1-2 as having PSMS control perform as active safety function after receiving a signal from PSMS.

11. Alarms and displays identified in Table A.1-3 are provided in the MCR.

12.a Alarms, displays and controls identified in Table A.1-3 are provided in the RSC.

12.b Controls on the RSC operate the as-built pumps, fans and valves identified in Table A.1-3.

13. Each UHS basin has a volume to satisfy the thirty day cooling water supply criteria.

14. The UHS transfer and ESW pumps have sufficient NPSH .

15. ESW pump operation does not cause vortex formation at minimum allowed UHSS water level.

16. Water hammer is prevented in the UHSS.

17. The sum of the ESW pump shutoff head and static head is such that the ESWS design pressure is not exceeded.

CTS-01174



Appendix A.1

Revision 112

18. The UHSS is capable of performing its safety functions under design basis event conditions and coincident single failure with or without offsite power available.

A.1.2 Inspections, Tests, Analysis, and Acceptance Criteria

Table A.1-1 describes the inspections, tests, analyses, and associated acceptance criteriaITAAC for the UHSS and ESWS portions outside the scope of the certified design.

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix A.1

Revision 113

Table A.1-1 (Sheet 1 of 7)

Ultimate Heat Sink System and Essential Service Water System (Portions Outside the Scope of the Certified Design)

Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses Acceptance Criteria

1.a The functional arrangement of the systemUHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) is as described in the Design Description of Section A.1.1 and as shown on Figure A.1-1.

1.a An iInspection of the as-built UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design)system will be performed.

1.a The as-built UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design)system conform to the functional arrangement as described in the Design Description of Section A.1.1 and as shown on Figure A.11.

1.b Each mechanical division of the UHSS and ESWSsystem (Division A, B, C & D) is physically separated from the other divisions, except for the header portion of the transfer line piping, so as not to preclude accomplishment of the safety function.

1.b Inspections and analysis of the as-built UHSS and ESWS system will be performed.

1.b A report exists and concludes that eachEach mechanical division of the as-built UHSS and ESWSsystem (Division A, B, C & D), except for the header portion of the transfer line piping is physically separated from the other divisions of the system by structural and/or fire barriersby spatial separation, barriers, or enclosures so as to assure that the functions of the safety related systems are maintained.

2.a.i The ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in Table A.1-2, are designed and constructedfabricated, installed and inspected in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.a.i An iInspection of the as-built ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) identified in Table A.1-2 will be performedconducted of the as-built components as documented in ASME design reports.

2.a.i The ASME Code Section III designdata report(s) (certified, when required by ASME Code) and inspection reports (including N-5 Data Reports where applicable) exist and conclude that the as-built ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) identified in Table A.1-2 are fabricated, installed, and inspected in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.reconciled with the design documents.

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-1CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-1CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.03-1



Appendix A.1

Revision 114

2.a.ii The ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in Table A.1-2, are reconciled with the design requirements.

2.a.ii A reconciliation analysis of the components identified in Table A.1-2 using as-designed and as-built information and ASME Code Section III design report(s) (NCA-3550) will be performed.

2.a.ii The ASME Code Section III design report(s) (certified, when required by ASME Code) exist and conclude that the design reconciliation has been completed in accordance with the ASME Code, for the as-built ASME Code Section III components of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) identified in Table A.1-2. The report documents the results of the reconciliation analysis.

2.b.i The ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, is designed and constructedfabricated, installed, and inspected in accordance with ASME Code Section III requirements.

2.b.i An iInspection of the as-built ASME Code piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, including supports, will be performedconducted of the as-built piping as documented in ASME design reports.

2.b.i The ASME cCode Section III designdata report(s) (certified, when required by ASME Code) and inspection reports (including N-5 Data Reports where applicable) exist and conclude that the as-built ASME Code Section III piping of the as-built ASME Code piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201 is fabricated, installed, and inspected in accordance with ASME Code Section IIIreconciled with the design documents.

2.b.ii The ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, is reconciled with the design requirements.

2.b.ii A reconciliation analysis of the piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, including supports, using as-designed and as-built information and ASME Code Section III design report(s) (NCA-3550) will be performed.

2.b.ii The ASME Code Section III design report(s) (certified, when required by ASME Code) exist and conclude that design reconciliation has been completed in accordance with the ASME Code, for the as-built ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201. The report documents the results of the reconciliation analysis.





CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.03-1

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.03-2



Appendix A.1

Revision 115

3.a Pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III components, identified in Table A.1-2, meet ASME Code Section III requirements for non-destructive examination of welds.

3.a Inspections of the as-built pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III piping identified in Table A.1-2 will be performed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III.

3.a The ASME Code Section III code reports exist and conclude that Tthe ASME Code Section III requirements are met for non-destructive examination of the as-built pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III piping identified in Table A.1-2.

3.b Pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, meets ASME Code Section III requirements for non-destructive examination of welds.

3.b Inspections of the as-built pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) identified in FSAR Table A.1-2 will be performed in accordance with the ASME Code Section III.

3.b The ASME Code Section III code reports exist and conclude that Tthe ASME Code Section III requirements are met for non-destructive examination of the as-built pressure boundary welds in ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201.

4.a The ASME Code Section III components, identified in Table A.1-2, retain their pressure boundary integrity at their design pressure.

4.a A hydrostatic test will be performed on the as-built components, identified in Table A.1-2, required by the ASME Code Section III to be hydrostatically tested.

4.a ASME Code Data Report(s) exist and conclude that Tthe results of the hydrostatic test of the as-built components identified in Table A.1-2 as ASME Code Section III conform to the requirements of the ASME Code Section III.

4.b The ASME Code Section III piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, retains its pressure boundary integrity at its design pressure.

4.b A hydrostatic test will be performed on the as-built piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, required by the ASME Code Section III to be hydrostatically tested.

4.b ASME Code Data Report(s) exist and conclude that Tthe results of the hydrostatic test of the as-built piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design) identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201 as ASME Code Section III conform to the requirements of the ASME Code Section III.

5.a The seismic cCategory I equipment, identified in Table A.1-2, can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

5.a.i Inspections will be performed to verify that the as-built seismic cCategory I as-built equipment identified in Table A.1-2 is installedlocated in the location identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201a seismic Category I structure.

5.a.i The seismic cCategory I as-built equipment identified in Table A.1-2 is installedlocated in the location identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201a seismic Category I structure.





RCOL2_14.03.03-3

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.03-3

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.03-3CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-3



Appendix A.1

Revision 116

5.a.ii Type tests, and/or analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of the seismic cCategory I equipment identified in Table A.1-2 will be performed using analytical assumptions, or will be performed under conditions which bound the seismic design basis requirements.

5.a.ii A report exists and concludes that The results of the type tests and/or analyses conclude that the seismic cCategory I equipment identified in Table A.1-2 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

5.a.iiiInspections and analyses will be performed to verify thaton the as-built seismic Category I equipment, identified in Table A.1-2, including anchorages, is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

5.a.iiiA report exists and concludes that Tthe as-built seismic Category I equipment identified in Table A.1-2, including anchorages, is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

5.b Each of tThe seismic cCategory I piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201, is designed tocan withstand combined normal and seismic design basis loads without a loss of its functional capabilitysafety function.

5.b.i Inspections will be performed to verify thaton the as-built seismic Category I piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201 are supported by a seismic Category I structure(s).

5.b.i Each of tThe as-built seismic cCategory I piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201 meets theare supported by a seismic cCategory I structure(s)requirements.

5.b.ii Inspections and analysis will be performed to verify that the as-built seismic Category I piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201 can withstand seismic design basis loads without a loss of its safety function.

5.b.ii A report exists and concludes that the as-built seismic Category I piping of the UHSS and ESWS (portions outside the scope of the certified design), including supports, identified in FSAR Table 3.2-201 can withstand seismic design basis loads without a loss of its safety function.

6.a The Class 1E components, identified in Table A.1-2, are powered from their respective Class 1E division.

6.a A Ttests will be performed on each division of the as-built systemClass 1E equipment identified in Table A.1-2 by providing a simulated test signal only in each the Class 1E division under test.

6.a The simulated test signal exists at the as-built Class 1E equipment identified in Table A.1-2. under test in the as-built system





CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.03-4

RCOL2_14.03.07-29CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-22



Appendix A.1

Revision 117

6.b Separation is provided between redundant divisions Class 1E divisionscables, and between Class 1E divisionscables and non-Class 1E cables.

6.b Inspections of the as-built Class 1E divisional cables and raceways will be conductedperformed.

6.b The as-built Class 1E electrical cables with only one division are routed in raceways assigned to the same division. There are no other safety division electrical cables in a raceway assigned to a different division.Physical separation or electrical isolation is provided in accordance with RG 1.75, between the as-built cables of redundant Class 1E divisions and between Class 1E cables and non-Class 1E cables.

7. The system provides adequate heat removal capability transferred design heat load from the ESWS.The UHSS is capable of removing the maximum design heat load transferred from the ESWS during normal plant operations, abnormal and accident conditions of the plant.

7. Tests and analyses of the as-built system will be performed.Tests and analyses will be performed to determine the heat removal capability of the as-built UHSS. The analysis will consider that the maximum ESWS supply water temperature is 95° F under the peak heat load condition.

7. A report exists and concludes that the as-built system provides adequate heat removal capability transferred design heat loadA report exists and concludes that the as-built UHSS removes the maximum design heat load transferred from the ESWS during normal plant operations, abnormal and accident conditions of the plant while maintaining a UHSS outlet temperature ≤ 95°F.

8. Controls existare provided in the MCR to open and close the remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2.

8. Tests will be performed on the as-built remotely operated valves listedidentified in Table A.1-2 using controls in the as-built MCR.

8. Controls in the as-built MCR operate to open and close the as-built remotely operated valves listedidentified in Table A.1-2.

9.a The remotely operated valves, identified in Table A.1-2 as having an active safety function to perform an active safety-related, function to change position as indicated in the table.

9.a.i Type tests or a combination of type tests and analyses of the remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2 as having an active safety function will be performed that demonstrate the capability of the valve to operate under its design conditions.

9.a.i A report exists and concludes that Eeach remotely operated valve identified in Table A.1-2 as having an active safety function changes position as indicated in Table A.1-2 under design conditions.

9.a.ii Tests of the as-built valves identified in Table A.1-2 as having an active safety function will be performed under pre-operational flow, differential pressure, and temperature, and flow conditions.

9.a.ii Each as-built remotely operated valve identified in Table A.1-2 as having an active safety function changes position as indicated in Table A.1-2 under pre-operational test conditions.





CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-4

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-5

RCOL2_14.03.07-29



Appendix A.1

Revision 118

9.b The remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2 as having PSMS control perform an active safety function after receiving a signal from PSMS.Upon the receipt of ECCS actuation signal or UHS basin low water level signal, the blowdown control valve closes automatically.

9.b Tests will be performed on the as-built remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2 using a simulated test signal.

9.b The as-built remotely operated valves identified in Table A.1-2 as having PSMS control perform the active function identified in the table after receiving a simulated signal.Upon the receipt of a simulated test signal, the as-built blowdown control valve closes automatically.

9.c After loss of motive power, the remotely operated valves, identified in Table A.1-2, assume the indicated loss of motive power position.

9.c Tests of the as-built valves identified in Table A.1-2 will be performed under the conditions of loss of motive power.

9.c Upon loss of motive power, each as-built remotely operated valve identified in Table A.1 -2 assumes the indicated loss of motive power position.

10.a Controls existare provided in the MCR to start and stop the pumps and fans identified in Table A.1-3.

10.a Tests will be performed on the as-built pumps and fans identified in Table A.1-3 using controls in the MCR.

10.a Controls in the MCR operate to start and stop the as-built pumps and fans listedidentified in Table A.1-3.

10.b The pump and fans identified in Table A.1-23 start after receiving a signal. as having PSMS control perform as active safety function after receiving a signal from PSMS.

10.b Tests will be performed on the as-built fans identified in Table A.1-2 using simulated signal.

10.b The as-built pump and fans identified in Table A.1 -23 start as having PSMS control perform the active function identified in the table after receiving a simulated signal.

11. Alarms and Ddisplays of the parameters identified in Table A.1-3 can be retrievedare provided in the MCR.

11. Inspections will be performed for retrievability of the system parameters inalarms and displays identified in Table A.1-3 the as-built MCR.

11. TheAlarms and displays identified in Table A.1-3 can be retrieved in the as-built MCR.

12.a Remote shutdown console (RSC) displays and/or controls provided for the system are identified in Table A.1-3 .Alarms, displays and controls identified in Table A.1-3 are provided in the RSC.

12.a Inspections will be performed on the as-built RSC displays and/or controls for the system.Inspection will be performed for retrievability of the alarms and displays identified in Table A.1-3 in the as-built RSC.

12.a Displays and/or controls exist on the as-built RSC as identified in Table A.1-3.Alarms and displays identified in Table A.1-3 can be retrieved in the as-built RSC.

12.b Tests of the as-built RSC control functions identified in Table A.1-3 will be performed.

12.b Controls on the RSC operate to open and close the as-built remotely operated valves and to start and stop the as-built pumps and fans identified in Table A.1-3 with an RSC control function..





RCOL2_14.03.07-6

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-6CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-7

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-30

RCOL2_14.03.07-7

RCOL2_14.03.07-30CTS-01174



Appendix A.1

Revision 119

13. Each UHS basin has a volume to satisfy the thirty day cooling water supply criteria.

13. Inspections will be performed to verify the as-built UHS basins include sufficient volume of water.

13. The usable water volume of the each as-built UHS basin is greater than or equal to 3.12 x 106 gallons at the minimum maintained water level.

14. The ultimate heat sinkUHS transfer and ESW pumps and essential service water pumps have sufficient NPSH.

14. Tests to measure the as-built suction pressure will be performed. Inspections and analysis to determine NPSH available to each pump will be performed.UHS transfer and ESW pump will be performed. The analyses will consider vendor test results of required NPSH and the effects of:

• Suction from the UHS basin with water level at the minimum allowed value (after 30 days of accident mitigation)

• UHSS design temperature range.

14. The as-built system meets the design, and the analysis confirmsA report exists and concludes that the NPSH available to each UHS transfer and ESW pump is exceedsgreater than the required NPSH.


15. Test of the as-built ESW pump will be performed.


16. Water hammer is prevented in the UHSS.

16. Inspection and analysis of the as-built UHSS will be performed.

16. A report exists and concludes that the as-built UHSS is fabricated and installed to prevent water hammer.

17. The sum of the ESW pump shutoff head and static head is such that the ESWS design pressure is not exceeded.

17. Inspection, test and analysis of the as-built ESWS will be performed.

17. A report exists and concludes that the sum of the as-built ESW pump shutoff head and static head is such that the ESWS design pressure is not exceeded.

18. The UHSS is capable of performing its safety functions under design basis event conditions and coincident single failure with or without offsite power available.

18. Inspection and analysis of the as-built UHSS will be performed.

18. A report exists and concludes that the as-built UHSS is capable of performing its safety functions under design basis event conditions and coincident single failure with or without offsite power available.





RCOL2_14.03.07-8

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-14

CTS-01174

Rev

isio

n 1

20

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Ap

pen

dix

A.1

Tab

le A

.1-2

(S

hee

t 1

of

2)U

ltim

ate

Hea

t S

ink

Sys

tem

an

d E

sse

nti

al S

erv

ice

Wa

ter

Sys

tem

(Po

rtio

ns

Ou

tsid

e t

he

Sc

op

e o

f th

e C

erti

fied

Des

ign

)E

qu

ipm

ent

Ch

ara

cte

rist

ics

Eq

uip

men

t N

ame

Tag

No

.A

SM

E C

od

e

Se

cti

on

III

C

las

s

Se

ism

ic

Ca

teg

ory

I

Rem

ote

ly

Op

era

ted

V

alv

e

Cla

ss 1

E/Q

ua

l. F

or

Ha

rsh

E

nv

ir.

Ac

tiv

e

Sa

fety

F

un

cti

on

PS

MS

C

on

tro

l

Lo

ss

of

Mo

tiv

e

Po

wer

P

osi

tio

n

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k tr

an

sfe

r p

um

ps

UH

S-O

MP

P-0

01

A,

B, C

, D

3Y

es

-Y

es/

No

Sta

rtS

top

Re

mo

te

Ma

nu

al-

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k co

olin

g to

we

r fa

nsU

HS

-OE

QM

FN

-001

A,

B,

C,

D,

002

A,

B,

C,

D-

Ye

s-

Ye

s/N

oS

tart

Sto

p

EC

CS

A

ctu

atio

n;

LO

OP

S

equ

enc

e;

Re

mo

te

Ma

nu

al

-

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k tr

an

sfe

r p

um

p

dis

cha

rge

va

lve

sU

HS

-MO

V-5

03 A

, B

, C

, D3

Ye

sY

esY

es/N

o

Tra

nsfe

r C

lose

dT

rans

fer

Op

en

Re

mo

te

Ma

nu

alA

s is

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k tr

an

sfe

r lin

e b

asi

n

inle

t va

lves

UH

S-M

OV

-506

A,

B,

C, D

3Y

es

Yes

Yes

/No

Tra

nsfe

r C

lose

dT

rans

fer

Op

en

Re

mo

te

Ma

nu

alA

s is

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k ba

sin

blo

wd

own

con

tro

l va

lve

s

ES

WE

WS

-HC

V-2

00

0,2

001

, 20

02

,200

30

10,

01

1, 0

12,

0

133

Ye

sY

esY

es/

No

Tra

nsfe

r C

lose

d

EC

CS

ac

tua

tion,

L

OO

P,

Pu

mp

st

op

, UH

S

ba

sin

low

w

ate

r le

vel,

Rem

ote

ma

nu

al

Clo

sed

ES

WP

Dis

cha

rge

Str

ain

er

Ba

ckw

ash

Is

ola

tion

Va

lve

to C

WS

blo

wdo

wn

ma

in h

ead

er

EW

S-A

OV

-576

A,

B,

C,

D3

Ye

sY

esY

es/N

oT

rans

fer

Clo

sed

EC

CS

ac

tua

tion,

L

OO

P,

Pu

mp

st

op

, UH

S

ba

sin

low

w

ate

r le

vel,

Rem

ote

m

an

ual

Clo

sed

RC

OL2

_14

.03.

07-6

MA

P-0

0-20

1

CT

S-0

1208

.

Rev

isio

n 1

21

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Ap

pen

dix

A.1

NO

TE

:

Das

h (-

) in

dica

tes

no

t ap

plic

ab

le.

ES

WS

Blo

wd

ow

n M

ain

Hea

de

r Is

ola

tion

Va

lve

to C

WS

blo

wdo

wn

ma

in h

ead

er

EW

S-A

OV

-577

3Y

es

Yes

Yes

/No

Tra

nsfe

r C

lose

d

EC

CS

ac

tua

tion,

L

OO

P,

Pu

mp

st

op

, UH

S

ba

sin

low

w

ate

r le

vel,

Rem

ote

m

an

ual

Clo

sed

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k ba

sin

wa

ter

leve

lU

HS

-LT

-20

700

10

A,B

,20

71

011

A,B

,207

20

12A

,B,2

073

013

A,B

-Y

es

-Y

es/

No

--

-

Ulti

ma

te h

ea

t sin

k ba

sin

te

mp

era

ture

UH

S-T

E-2

070

,20

71

,20

72,2

073

01

0, 0

11,

01

2, 0

13

-Y

es

-Y

es/

No

--

-

Tab

le A

.1-2

(S

hee

t 2

of

2)U

ltim

ate

Hea

t S

ink

Sys

tem

an

d E

sse

nti

al S

erv

ice

Wa

ter

Sys

tem

(Po

rtio

ns

Ou

tsid

e t

he

Sc

op

e o

f th

e C

erti

fied

Des

ign

)E

qu

ipm

ent

Ch

ara

cte

rist

ics

Eq

uip

men

t N

ame

Tag

No

.A

SM

E C

od

e

Se

cti

on

III

C

las

s

Se

ism

ic

Ca

teg

ory

I

Rem

ote

ly

Op

era

ted

V

alv

e

Cla

ss 1

E/Q

ua

l. F

or

Ha

rsh

E

nv

ir.

Ac

tiv

e

Sa

fety

F

un

cti

on

PS

MS

C

on

tro

l

Lo

ss

of

Mo

tiv

e

Po

wer

P

osi

tio

n

RC

OL2

_14

.03.

07-6

CT

S-0

1208



Appendix A.1

Revision 122

Table A.1-3

Ultimate Heat Sink System and Essential Service Water System (Portions Outside the Scope of the Certified Design) Equipment Alarms, Displays, and Control Functions

Equipment/Instrument Name MCR/RSC Alarm

MCR/RSC Display

MCR/RSCControl

Function

RSC Dis-play

Ultimate heat sink transfer pumps UHS-OMPP-001A, B, C, D No Yes Yes Yes

Ultimate heat sink cooling tower fansUHS-OEQMFN-001A, B, C, D, 002A, B, C, D No Yes Yes Yes

Ultimate heat sink transfer pump discharge valvesUHS-MOV-503A, B, C, D

No Yes Yes Yes

Ultimate heat sink transfer line basin inlet valvesUHS-MOV-506A, B, C, D

No Yes Yes Yes

Ultimate heat sink basin blowdown control valvesESW-HCV-2000, 2001, 2002, 2003010, 011, 012, 013

No Yes Yes Yes

Ultimate heat sink basin water level UHS-LT-2070010A, B, 2071 011A, B, 2072012A, B, 2073013A, B

Yes Yes YesNo Yes

Essential Service Water basin water temperature UHS-TE-2070, 2071, 2072, 2073010, 011, 012, 013 Yes Yes YesNo Yes

ESWP Discharge Strainer Backwash Isolation Valve to CWS blowdown main headerEWS-AOV-576A, B, C, D

No Yes Yes

ESWS Blowdown Main Header Isolation Valve to CWS blowdown main headerEWS-AOV-577

No Yes Yes

RCOL2_14.03.07-7

MAP-00-201

CTS-01208

Rev

isio

n 1

23

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Ap

pen

dix

A.1

Fig

ure

A.1

-1U

ltim

ate

Hea

t S

ink

Sys

tem

an

d E

ssen

tial

Ser

vice

Wat

er S

yste

m

(Po

rtio

ns

Ou

tsid

e th

e S

cop

e o

f th

e C

erti

fied

Des

ign

)

CT

S-0

1208

3

A-E

SS

EN

TIA

L S

ER

VIC

E W

ATE

R P

UM

P

A-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T SI

NK

TR

AN

SFE

R

PU

MP

A-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T SI

NK

B

AS

IN

A-U

LTIM

ATE

HE

AT

SIN

K C

OO

LIN

G T

OW

ER

FA

N

MO

V-5

06A

MO

V-5

03A

3

EWS

-H

CV

-0

10

EWS

-VLV

-5

44A

3

EWS

-V

LV

-552

A

EWS

-VLV

-5

51A

N 3

EWS

A

-RE

TUR

N L

INE

EWS

A-S

UPP

LY

HE

AD

ER

LIN

E

FIRE

PRO

TEC

TIO

N W

ATER

SUP

PLY

SY

STEM

M

M

M

M

M

M

EWS

-AO

V-

576A

N

MAK

EU

P W

ATE

R

B-E

SSE

NTI

AL

SE

RVI

CE

W

ATE

R P

UM

P

B-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T SI

NK

TR

AN

SFE

R

PU

MP

B-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T S

INK

BAS

IN

B-U

LTIM

ATE

HE

AT

SIN

K

CO

OLI

NG

TO

WE

R F

AN

MO

V-5

06B

MO

V-5

03B

3

3

EWS

-HC

V

-011

EW

S -V

LV

-544

B

3

EWS

-VLV

-5

52B

EWS

-V

LV

-551

B

N 3

EWS

B-R

ETU

RN

LIN

E

EWS

B-S

UPP

LY

HE

AD

ER

LIN

E

FIR

E PR

OTE

CTIO

NW

ATER

SU

PPLY

SY

STEM

M

M

M

M

M

M

EWS

-AO

V-

576B

N

MA

KE

UP

WA

TER

C-E

SS

EN

TIA

L S

ER

VIC

E W

ATE

R P

UM

P

C-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T SI

NK

TR

AN

SFE

R

PU

MP

C-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T SI

NK

B

AS

IN

C-U

LTIM

ATE

HE

AT

SIN

K

CO

OLI

NG

TO

WE

R F

AN

MO

V-5

06C

MO

V-5

03C

3

3

EWS

-H

CV

-0

12

3

EWS

-V

LV

-552

C

EWS

-VLV

-5

51C

N 3

EWS

C

-RE

TUR

N L

INE

EWS

C-S

UP

PLY

H

EA

DE

R L

INE

FIRE

PRO

TECT

ION

WAT

ER S

UPPL

Y

SYST

EM

M

M

M

M

MM

EWS

-AO

V-

576C

N

MAK

EU

P W

ATE

R

D-E

SSE

NTI

AL

SE

RVI

CE

W

ATE

R P

UM

P

D-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T S

INK

TRA

NS

FER

P

UM

P

D-U

LTIM

ATE

H

EA

T S

INK

BAS

IN

D-U

LTIM

ATE

HE

AT

SIN

K

CO

OLI

NG

TO

WE

R F

AN

MO

V-5

06D

MO

V-5

03D

3

3

EWS

-HC

V

-013

EW

S

-VLV

-5

44D

3

EWS

-VLV

-5

52D

EWS

-V

LV

-551

D

N 3

EWS

D-R

ETU

RN

LIN

E

EWS

D

-SU

PP

LY

HE

AD

ER

LIN

E

FIRE

PRO

TECT

ION

WAT

ER S

UPPL

Y

SYST

EM

M

M

M

M

MM

EWS

-AO

V-

576D

N

MA

KE

UP

W

ATE

R

BLO

WD

OW

N

N

3

EWS

-AO

V-

577

REM

ARK

S

yste

m n

ame

of v

alve

num

ber i

s om

itted

in th

is d

raw

ing.

UH

S-##

#-++

+

3 3

33

33

33



Appendix A.2

Revision 124


UHS ESW PUMP HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEM


The UHS ESW pump house ventilation system provides and maintains area design temperature limits in the UHS ESW pump houses during all plant operating, abnormal and accident conditions.

The UHS ESW pump house ventilation system is located within the UHS related structure.

There are four separate and independent UHS ESW pump houses and each has its own ventilation system.

1.a The functional arrangement of the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system is as described in the Design Description of Section A.2.1 and as shown in Figure A.2-1

1.b Each mechanical division of the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system (Division A, B, C & D) is physically separated from the other divisions so as not to preclude accomplishment of the safety function.

2. The seismic Category I equipment, identified in Table A.2-2, can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

3.a Class 1E equipment identified in Table A.2-2 is powered from its respective Class 1E division.

3.b. Separation is provided between redundant divisions of UHS ESW pump house ventilation system Class 1E cables, and between Class 1E cables and non-Class 1E cable.

4. The UHS ESW pump house ventilation system provides ventilation air to maintain area temperature within design limits in the UHS ESW pump houses during normal operations, abnormal and accident conditions of the plant.

5.a. Controls are provided in the MCR to start and stop the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-3.

5.b. The UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-2 as having PSMS control, perform as active safety function after receiving a signal from PSMS.

6. Displays of the parameters identified in Table A.2-3 are provided in the MCR.

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

CTS-01174



Appendix A.2

Revision 125

7. Displays and controls identified in Table A.2-3 are provided in the RSC.

A.2.2 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

Table A.2-1 specifies the inspections, tests, analyses, and associated acceptance criteriaITAAC for the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system.

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix A.2

Revision 126

Table A.2-1 (Sheet 1 of 3)UHS ESW Pump House Ventilation System



1.a The functional arrangement of the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system is as described in the Design Description of Section A.2.1 and as shown onin Figure A.2-1

1.a An iInspection of the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system will be performed.

1.a The as-built the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system conforms withto the functional arrangement as described in the Design Description of Section A.2.1 and as shown onin Figure A.2-1.

1.b Each mechanical division of the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system (Division A, B, C & D) is physically separated from the other divisions so as not to preclude accomplishment of the safety function.

1.b Inspections and analysis of the as-built UHEUHS ESW pump house ventilation system will be performed.

1.b EachA report exists and concludes that each mechanical division of the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system is physically separated from other mechanical divisions by structural and/or fire barriersby spatial separation, barriers, or enclosures so as to assure that the functions of the safety related systems are maintained.

2. The seismic cCategory I equipment, identified in Table A.2-2, is designed tocan withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

2.a Inspections will be performed to verify that the as-built seismic cCategory I as-built equipment identified in Table A.2-2 is located in the UHS relateda seismic Category I structure.

2.a The as-built seismic cCategory I as-built equipment identified in Table A.2-2 is located in the UHS relateda seismic Category I structure.

2.b Type tests, and/or analyses, or a combination of type tests and analyses of the seismic cCategory I equipment identified in Table A.2-2 will be performed using analytical assumptions, or will be performed under conditions, which bound the seismic design basis requirements.

2.b The result of the type tests and/or analysesA report exists and concludes that the seismic cCategory I equipment identified in Table A.2-2 can withstand seismic design basis loads without loss of safety function.

2.c Inspection and analyses will be performed to verify that on the as-built equipment identified in Table A.2-2, including anchorages, is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

2.c TheA report exists and concludes that the as-built seismic Category Iequipment identified in Table A.2-2, including anchorages, is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed conditions.

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-3



Appendix A.2

Revision 127

3.a The Class 1E componentsequipment, identified in Table A.2-2, areis powered from theirits respective Class 1E division.

3.a A test will be performed on each division of the as-built Class 1E equipment identified in Table A.2-2UHS ESW pump house ventilation system by providing a simulated test signal only in eachthe Class 1E division under test.

3.a The simulated test signal exists only at the as-built Class 1E equipment identified in Table A.2 -2 under test in the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system.

3.b. Separation is provided between redundant divisions of UHS ESW pump house ventilation system Class 1E divisionscables, and between Class 1E divisionscables and non-Class 1E cable.

3.b Inspections of the as-built Class 1E divisional cables and raceways will be performed.

3.b The as-built Class 1E electrical cables with only one division are routed in raceways assigned to the same division. There are no other safety division electrical cables in a raceway assigned to a different division.Physical separation or electrical isolation is provided in accordance with RG 1.75 between the redundant divisions of the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system Class 1E cables and between Class 1E cables and non-Class 1E cables.

4. The UHS ESW pump house ventilation system provides ventilation air to maintain area temperature within design limitsprovides and maintains the proper environmental conditions within the respective roomUHS ESW pump houses during normal operations, abnormal and accident conditions of the plant.

4. Tests and analyses of the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system will be performed for all four divisions.

4. TheA report exists and concludes that the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system provides and maintains the proper environmental conditionsis capable of withinproviding ventilation air to maintain area temperature within design limits in the respective room by the exhaust fan and/or unit heater operationUHS ESW pump houses during normal operations, abnormal and accident conditions of the plant with outside ambient design temperature condition (i.e. -5°F - 115 °F).

5.a. Controls existare provided in the MCR to start and stop the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-3.

5.a. Tests will be performed on the as-built exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-3 using controls in the as-built MCR.

5.a Controls exist in the as-built MCR operate to start and stop the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-3.




CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-22

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-4

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-1

RCOL2_14.03.07-15CTS-01174

RCOL2_09.04.05-15

RCOL2_14.03.07-16



Appendix A.2

Revision 128

5.b. The UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters units identified in Table A.2-23 as having PSMS control, perform as active safety functionstart after receiving a signal from PSMS.

5.b. Tests will be performed on of the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-2 as having PSMSwill be performed using real or simulated signals.

5.b. The as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system exhaust fans and unit heaters identified in Table A.2-23 as having PSMS control, perform an active safety function identified in the table start after receiving a simulated signal.

6. Displays of the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system parameters identified in Table A.2-3 can be retrievedare provided in the MCR.

6. Inspections will be performed for retrievability of the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system parametersdisplays identified in Table A.2-3 in the as-built MCR.

6. The dDisplays identified in Table A.2-3 can be retrieved in the as-built MCR.

7. Remote shutdown console (RSC) displays and/or controls provided for the UHS ESW pump house ventilation system are identified in Table A.2-3.Displays and controls identified in Table A.2-3 are provided in the RSC.

7.a Inspections will be performed on the as-built RSC displays and/or controls for the as-built UHS ESW pump house ventilation system.Inspections will be performed for retrievability of the displays identified in Table A.2-3 in the as-built RSC.

7.a The displays and/or controls exist on the as-built RSC as identified in Table A.2-3.Displays identified in Table A.2-3 can be retrieved in the as-built RSC.

7.b Tests of the as-built RSC control functions identified in Table A.2-3 will be performed.

7.b Controls in the as-built RSC operate the as-built equipment identified in Table A.2-3 with an RSC control function.




CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-6

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-7

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-30

. .

Rev

isio

n 1

29

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Ap

pen

dix

A.2

Tab

le A

.2-2

(S

hee

t 1

of

2)U

HS

ES

W P

um

p H

ou

se V

en

tila

tio

n S

yst

em E

qu

ipm

en

t C

har

act

eris

tic

s

Eq

uip

men

t N

ame

Tag

No

.

AS

ME

C

od

e S

ecti

on

III

Cla

ss

Sei

smic

C

ateg

ory

I

Rem

ote

ly

Op

era

ted

V

alve

Dam

per

Cla

ss

1E/

Qu

al. F

or

Ha

rsh

En

vir.

PS

MS

C

on

tro

l

Ac

tive

S

afet

y F

un

cti

on

Lo

ss o

f M

oti

ve

Po

we

r P

osi

tio

n

ES

W P

ump

Roo

m E

xhau

st

Fa

nV

RS

-OM

FN

-601

A,B

,C,D

-Y

es-

Yes

/No

Hig

h T

empe

ratu

reS

tart

-

UH

S T

ran

sfer

P

ump

Roo

m

Exh

aust

Fan

VR

S-O

MF

N-6

02A

,B,C

,D-

Yes

-Y

es/N

oH

igh

Tem

pera

ture

Sta

rt-

ES

W P

ump

Roo

m U

nit

Hea

ter

VR

S-O

EQ

ME

H-6

01A

,B,C

,D,

VR

S-O

EQ

ME

H-6

02A

,B,C

,D-

Yes

-Y

es/N

oLo

w

Tem

pera

ture

Sta

rt-

UH

S T

ran

sfer

P

ump

Roo

m

Uni

t Hea

ter

VR

S-O

EQ

ME

H-6

03A

,B,C

,D-

Yes

-Y

es/N

oLo

w

Tem

pera

ture

Sta

rt-

ES

W P

ump

Roo

m

Te

mp

erat

ure

switc

h

VR

S-T

S-8

03,

804,

805,

806

VR

S-T

S-8

23,

824,

825,

826

VR

S-T

S-8

43,

844,

845,

846

VR

S-T

S-8

63,

864,

865,

866

-Y

es-

Yes

/No

--

-

UH

S T

ran

sfer

P

ump

Roo

m

Te

mp

erat

ure

switc

h

VR

S-T

S-8

12,

813,

814,

815

VR

S-T

S-8

32,

833,

834,

835

VR

S-T

S-8

52,

853,

854,

855

VR

S-T

S-8

72,

873,

874,

875

-Y

es-

Yes

/No

--

-

ES

W P

ump

Roo

m A

ir In

take

G

ravi

ty T

ype

B

ackd

raft

Dam

per

VR

S-B

DD

-601

A,B

,C,D

-Y

es-

No/

No

-(1

)-

ES

W P

ump

Roo

m A

ir D

is-

char

ge G

ravi

ty

Type

Bac

kdra

ft D

ampe

r

VR

S-B

DD

-602

A,B

,C,D

-Y

es-

No/

No

-(1

)-

CT

S-0

1208

RC

OL2

_14

.03.

07-6

MA

P-0

0-20

1

RC

OL2

_09.

04.

05-1

4

RC

OL2

_14

.03.

07-7

RC

OL2

_14

.03.

07-2

1

RC

OL2

_09

.04

.05

-14

Rev

isio

n 1

30

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Ap

pen

dix

A.2

(1)

Th

e ba

ckd

raft

dam

pers

are

pas

sive

co

mpo

nent

s th

at h

ave

the

saf

ety

func

tions

to o

pen

in th

e di

rect

ion

of a

irflo

w a

nd c

lose

by

coun

terb

ala

nce

whe

n no

air

flow

is p

rese

nt.

UH

S T

rans

fer

Pum

p R

oom

Air

Inta

ke G

ravi

ty

Type

Bac

kdra

ft D

ampe

r

VR

S-B

DD

-603

A,B

,C,D

-Y

es-

No/

No

-(1

)-

UH

S T

rans

fer

Pum

p A

ir D

is-

char

ge G

ravi

ty

Type

Bac

kdra

ft D

ampe

rs

VR

S-B

DD

-604

A,B

,C,D

-Y

es-

No/

No

-(1

)-

Tab

le A

.2-2

(S

hee

t 2

of

2)U

HS

ES

W P

um

p H

ou

se V

en

tila

tio

n S

yst

em E

qu

ipm

en

t C

har

act

eris

tic

s

Eq

uip

men

t N

ame

Tag

No

.

AS

ME

C

od

e S

ecti

on

III

Cla

ss

Sei

smic

C

ateg

ory

I

Rem

ote

ly

Op

era

ted

V

alve

Dam

per

Cla

ss

1E/

Qu

al. F

or

Ha

rsh

En

vir.

PS

MS

C

on

tro

l

Ac

tive

S

afet

y F

un

cti

on

Lo

ss o

f M

oti

ve

Po

we

r P

osi

tio

nC

TS

-012

08

RC

OL2

_14

.03.

07-6

RC

OL2

_09.

04.

05-1

4



Appendix A.2

Revision 131

Table A.2-3UHS ESW Pump House Ventilation System Equipment

Alarms, Displays, and Control Functions

Equipment/Instrument NameMCR/R

SC Alarm

MCR/RSC Display

MCR/RSCControl

Function

RSC Display

ESW Pump Room Exhaust Fan(VRS-OMFN-601A,B,C,D)

No Yes Yes Yes

UHS Transfer Pump Room Exhaust Fan(VRS-OMFN-602A,B,C,D)

No Yes Yes Yes

ESW Pump Room Unit Heater(VRS-OEQMEH-601A,B,C,D, VRS-OEQMEH-602A,B,C,D)

No Yes Yes Yes

UHS Transfer Pump Room Unit Heater(VRS-OEQMEH-603A,B,C,D)

No Yes Yes Yes

ESW Pump Room Temperature(VRS-TS-2610C,D,E,F, VRS-TS-2620C,D,E,F, VRS-TS-2630C,D,E,F, VRS-TS-2640C,D,E,F)

Yes No Yes No

UHS Transfer Pump Room Temperature( VRS-TS-2615C,D,E,F, VRS-TS-2625C,D,E,F, VRS-TS-2635C,D,E,F, VRS-TS-2645C,D,E,F)

Yes No Yes No

RCOL2_14.03.07-7

MAP-00-201

CTS-01208

RCOL2_14.03.07-27

Rev

isio

n 1

32

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Ap

pen

dix

A.2

Fig

ure

A.2

-1U

HS

ES

W P

um

p H

ou

se V

enti

lati

on

Sys

tem

MA

P-0

0-20

1C

TS

-012

08



Appendix A.3

Revision 133


PLANT-SPECIFIC STRUCTURES


The site-specific structures are comprised of the UHS related structures (UHSRS), ESW pipe tunnel (ESWPT) and power source fuel storage vault (PSFSV), which are seismic Category I structures. The seismic Category I structures are designed and constructed to withstand design-basis loads without loss of structural integrity. Design basis loads are:

• Normal plant operation (including dead loads, live loads, lateral earth pressure loads, equipment loads, hydrodynamic loads temperature and equipment vibration)

• External events (including rain, snow, flood, tornado, tornado generated missiles and safe shutdown earthquake)

• Internal events (including flood, pipe rupture, equipment failure, and equipment failure generated missiles).

A.3.1.1 UHSRS

The UHSRS consists of an UHS cooling tower enclosure, UHS ESW pump houses, and an UHS basin. These structures are described below.

UHS cooling tower enclosures - Each UHS basin has one cooling tower with two cells. Each cell is enclosed by reinforced concrete structures that house the equipment required to cool the water used by the ESWS. The reinforced concrete wall separates the two cell enclosures. A reinforced concrete wall, running eastwest, separates the cell enclosure portion of the basin from the rest of the UHS basin. Air intakes serving the cooling towers are configured to protect the safety-related substructures and components from tornado missiles.

UHS ESW pump house - The pump house is an integral part of the UHS basin supported by UHS basin exterior and interior walls. Each pump house contains one ESW pump and one UHS transfer pump with associated auxiliaries. The pump bay (lowest portion of the pump house required for the pump suction) is deeper than the rest of the UHS basin. A reinforced concrete wall divides the pump house basin from the rest of the UHS basin and is configured to prevent postulated direct or deflected design basis tornado missiles from impacting safety related components located within the structure. There is a fire barrier between the UHS transfer pump and the UHS ESW pump of each UHS ESW pump house.

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-28CTS-01174



Appendix A.3

Revision 134

UHS Basin - There are four basins for each unit and each basin has one cooling tower with two cells. Each basin is constructed of reinforced concrete and serves as a reservoir for the ESWS. Two basins share a common foundation mat and a reinforced concrete wall divides them.

A.3.1.2 ESWPT

The ESWPT is a reinforced concrete structure that runs from beneath the T/B to the UHSRS. The ESWPT is divided into two sections by a concrete wall. Each section contains both ESWS supply and return lines. The ESWPT structure is isolated from other structures to prevent seismic structural interaction.

A.3.1.3 PSFSV

The PSFSVs are reinforced concrete structures, which house the safety-related and non safety-related fuel oil tanks for the emergency power generators. There is one vault for each PS/B founded on separate reinforced concrete basemats. The vault contains three oil tanks, two safety-related and one non safety-related. Each tank is contained in a separate compartment separated by reinforced concrete walls. The top of the roof slab is at the finished plant grade elevation, with a concrete curb. The curb is provided to prevent vehicular traffic on the roof.

1. The structural configurations of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are as described in the Design Description of Section A.3, in Table A.3-2, and as shown in FSAR Figures 3.8-201 through 3.8-214.

2.a Divisional flood barriers are provided in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV to protect against internal flooding.

2.b Deleted

3. Deleted

4. For the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV, external walls below flood level are as indicated in Table A.3-2 to protect against water seepage.

5.a Deleted

5.b Deleted

6. Penetrations in the external walls of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV that are at or below design basis flood level are fitted with wate-tight seals to protect against external flooding.

7. Redundant safe shutdown components and associated electrical divisions of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are separated by 3-hour rated fire

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

CTS-01174



Appendix A.3

Revision 135

barriers to preserve the capability to safely shutdown the plant following a fire.

8. Penetrations and openings through the fire barriers of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are protected against fire.

9. The UHRS, ESWPT and PSFSV can withstand design-basis loads.

10. SSCs that require evaluation in the seismic fragilities task of a seismic margin analysis have high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) values equal to or greater than the review level earthquake.


Table A.3-1 describes the inspections, tests analyses, and associated acceptance criteriaITAAC for the ultimate heat sinkUHS related structure (UHSRS), essential service waterESW pipe tunnel (ESWPT), and power source fuel storage vault (PSFSV).

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix A.3

Revision 136

Table A.3-1 (Sheet 1 of 4)UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

Design Commitment Inspections, Tests, Analyses

Acceptance Criteria

1. The structural configurations of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are as described in the Design Description of Section A.3, in Table A.3-2, and as shown in FSAR Figures 3.8-201 through 3.8-214 and Table A.3-2.

1. Inspections will be performed to verify that of the as-built structural configurations of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV will be performedconform to the structural configurations as described in the Design Description of Section A.3, Table A.3-2, and as shown in Figures 3.8-201 through 3.8-214 .

1. The as-built design configurations of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV conform to the structural configurations as described in Table A.3-2 and as shown in are reconciled with descriptions in FSAR Figures 3.8-201 through 3.8-214 and Table A.3-2 with the following construction tolerances..

1) Thickness of exterior walls below plant grade: +12 inches/- 1inch

2) Thickness of exterior walls above plant grade, and interior walls: +1/-1 inch

3) Thickness of floors: +1/-1 inch

4) Floor level: +1/-1 inch.

2.a Divisional flood barriers are provided in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV to protect against the internal and external flooding.

2.a.iAn inspection will be performed to verify that the as-built divisional flood barriers exist in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV.An analysis will be performed to verify the as-built divisional flood barriers of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are designed to protect against internal flooding

2.a.i A report exists and concludes that Tthe as-built divisional flood barriers exist at the appropriate locations in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV against the internal and external floodingare designed to protect against internal flooding.

2.a.iiAn inspection will be performed to verify that the as-built divisional flood barriers are provided in the UHSRS, EWSPT and PSFSV to protect against internal flooding.

2.a.iiAs-built divisional flood barriers in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are provided to protect against internal flooding.

2.b Water-tight doors are provided in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV to protect against the internal and external flooding.Deleted

2.b An inspection of the as-built water-tight doors will be performed.Deleted

2.b The as-built water-tight doors exist at the appropriate locations in the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV against the internal and external flooding.Deleted

RCOL2_14.03.07-9CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-32CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-10

CTS-01208

RCOL2_14.03.07-10



Appendix A.3

Revision 137

3. Penetrations in the divisional walls of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV, except for water-tight doors, are provided appropriately against the internal and external flooding.Deleted

3. An inspection of the as-built penetrations will be performed.Deleted

3. The as-built penetrations in the divisional walls of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are installed at an acceptable level above the floor, and are sealed up to the internal and external flooding levels.Deleted

4. For the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV, external walls thicknessbelow flood level are as indicated in Table A.3-2 below flood level is provided to protect against water seepage.

4. An inspection will performed ofto verify that the as-built external walls below flood level thickness for the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV will be performedare as indicated in Table A.3-2.

4. For the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV, the as-built external walls below flood level are as indicated in Table A.3-2 below flood level are provided with adequate thickness to protect against water seepage.

5.a Flood barriers of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are installed up to the finished plant grade level to protect against water seepage.Deleted

5.a An inspection of the as-built flood barriers will be performed.Deleted

5.a he as-built flood barriers are installed up to the finished plant grade level for the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV to protect against water seepage.Deleted

5.b Flood doors and flood barriers penetrations of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are provided with flood protection features.Deleted

5.b Inspections of the as-built flood doors and flood penetrations will be performed.Deleted

5.b For the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV, the as-built flood doors and flood barrier penetrations are provided with flood protection features to protect against water seepage.Deleted

6. Penetrations in the external walls, including those up to the subgrade level if necessary, of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV that are at or below design basis flood level are fitted with water-tight seals to protect against external floodingprovided with flood protection features below flood level.

6. An inspection will be performed to verify that the flood protection features of the as-built penetrations in the external walls of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV exist below flood levelthat are at or below design basis flood level are fitted with water-tight seals.

6. The as-built penetrations in the external walls of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV that are at or below design basis flood level are fitted with water-tight seals to protect against external flooding.of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are provided with flood protection features below flood level.



Acceptance Criteria

CTS-01208

RCOL2_14.03.07-11

RCOL2_14.03.07-11CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-17RCOL2_14.03.07-29CTS-01208

RCOL2_14.03.07-18CTS-01208

RCOL2_14.03.07-29

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-12



Appendix A.3

Revision 138

7. Redundant safe shutdown components and associated electrical divisions of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are separated by 3-hour rated fire barriers to preserve the capability to safely shutdown the plant following a fire. The 3-hour rated fire barriers are placed as required by the FHA.

7. An inspection will be performed to verify that of the as-built 3-hour rated fire barriers will be performedare placed as required by the FHA.

7. Redundant safe shutdown components and associated electrical divisions of each as-built UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are separated by 3-hour rated fire barriers to preserve the capability to safely shutdown the plant following a fire. The 3-hour rated as-built fire barriers are placed as required by the FHA.

8. All pPenetrations and openings through the fire barriers of the UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are protected against fire.

8. An inspection will be performed to verify that the as-built components are provided to protect the penetrations and openings through fire barriers identified in the FHA are sealed or can be closed with fire rated components consistent with the fire resistance rating of the associated barrier.

8. All aAs-built penetrations and openings through fire barriers identified in the FHA of the UHSRS, ESWPT and the PSFSV are protected against fire with 3-hour fire rated components (i.ee.g. fire doors in door openings, fire dampers in ventilation duct openings, and penetration seals) consistent with the fire resistance rating of the associated barrier.

9. The UHRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are designed based on the structuralcan withstand design-basis loads.

9.i An analysis will be performed to reconcile each as-built UHSRS with the design basis loads.An analysis will be performed to verify that the as-built UHRS, ESWPT and PSFSV, other than the PCCV, structural design-basis loads are reconciled.

9.i Design rReports exist and conclude that for theeach as-built UHSRS, ESWPT and PSFSV are designed in accordance with structuralcan withstand design-basis loads.

9.ii An analysis will be performed to reconcile each as-built ESWPT with the design basis loads.

9.ii Reports exist and conclude that each as-built ESWPT can withstand design-basis loads.

9.iii An analysis will be performed to reconcile each as-built PSFSV with the design basis loads.

9.iii Reports exist and conclude that each as-built PSFSV can withstand design-basis loads.

10. SSCs that require evaluation in the seismic fragilities task of a seismic margin analysis have high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) values equal to or greater than the review level earthquake.

10.a Analyses will be performed to verify that the SSCs requiring evaluation in the seismic fragilities task of a seismic margin assessment have HCLPF values equal to or greater than the review level earthquake.

10.a Reports exist and conclude that the SSCs evaluated in the seismic fragilities task of the seismic margin assessment have HCLPF values equal to or greater than the review level earthquake.



Acceptance Criteria

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-19CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.07-19

RCOL2_14.03.07-20

CTS-01174



Appendix A.3

Revision 139

10.b Inspection and analysis will be performed to verify that as-built SSCs requiring evaluation in the seismic fragilities task of a seismic margin assessment are bounded by conditions used in the seismic margin assessment.

10.b A report exists and concludes that the as-built SSCs requiring evaluation in the seismic fragilities task of a seismic margin assessment are bounded by the conditions used in the seismic margin assessment.



Acceptance Criteria

CTS-01174



Appendix A.3

Revision 141

Mat Slab - 793.08’ 2’-0” No

Exterior Wall (North) - From 788.50’ to 823.60’ 2’-6” No

Exterior Wall (South) - From 788.50’ to 822.60’ 2’-6” No

Exterior Wall (East Wall of East Vault and West Wall of West Vault)

- From 788.50’ to 823.60’ From 2’-6” to 4’-6”

No

Exterior Wall (West Wall of East Vault and East Wall of West Vault)

- From 788.50’ to 823.60’ From 2’-6” to 4’-6”

No

Roof Slab - From 822.00’ to 823.60’ 2’-0” No

Mat Slab - 788.50’ 6’-6” No

Table A.3-2 (Sheet 2 of 2)Definition of Wall Thicknesses for Safety-Related Structures: ESWPT

Wall or Section Description

Column Lines

Floor Elevation or Elevation Range

Concrete Thickness

Applicable

NOTE:Dash (-) indicates not applicable.

CTS-01208



Appendix A.4

Revision 142


OFFSITE POWER SYSTEM (PORTIONS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE CERTIFIED DESIGN)


1. The electrical system has a minimum of two independent offsite transmission circuits from the transmission network (TN) to the safety buses with no intervening non-safety buses (direct connection).

2. The offsite TN voltage variations, during steady-state operation, do not cause voltage variations beyond an acceptable tolerance of the loads’ nominal ratings.

3. The offsite TN normal steady-state frequency is within an acceptable tolerance of 60Hz during recoverable periods of system instability.

4. The offsite transmission circuits have the capacity and capability to power the required loads during steady-state, transient, and postulated events and accident conditions.

5.a Independence between the offsite circuits and the onsite Class 1E electrical system and components is maintained.

5.b The offsite circuits are physically separated from the onsite Class 1E electrical system and components.

6. Lightning protection and grounding features are provided for the offsite circuits from the TN to the safety buses.

7. Alarms and displays for monitoring the switchyard equipment status can be retrieved in the MCR.

8. If power through the normal preferred power supply is not available, the offsite electrical system has the capability to automatic fast transfer to the alternate preferred power supply if available.

9. The switchyard agreement and protocols between NPP and the TN system owner/operator assess the risk and probability of a loss of offsite power due to performing maintenance activities on the electrical system.

10. The probability of losing electric power from any of the remaining supplies as a result of, or coincident with, the loss of power generated by the nuclear unit, the loss of power from the TN, or the loss of power from the onsite electric power supplies, is minimized.

RCOL2_14.03.07-28

CTS-01174



Appendix A.4

Revision 143


Table A.4-1 describes the inspections, tests, analyses, and associated acceptance criteriaITAAC for the Offsite power system portions outside the scope of the certified design.

CTS-01174



Appendix A.4

Revision 144

Table A.4-1 (Sheet 1 of 2)Offsite Power System

(Portions Outside the Scope of the Certified Design)Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria


1. The electrical system has a minimum of two independent offsite transmission circuits from the transmission network (TN) to the safety buses with no intervening non-safety buses (direct connection).

1. Inspection of the as-built transmission circuits will be performed.

1. The as-built electrical system has two independent offsite transmission circuits from the TN to the safety buses with no intervening non-safety buses (direct connection).

2. The offsite TN voltage variations, during steady-state operation, does not cause voltage variations beyond an acceptable tolerance of the loads’ nominal ratings.

2. Analyses of the as-built offsite TN voltage variability and steady state load requirements will be performed.

2. A report exists and concludes that the as-built offsite TN, during steady state operation, does not cause voltage variations beyond design limits.

3. The offsite TN normal steady state frequency is within an acceptable tolerance of 60Hz during recoverable periods of system instability.

3. Analyses of the as-built offsite TN normal steady state frequency will be performed.

3. A report exists and concludes that the as-built TN normal steady state frequency is within design frequency limits during recoverable periods of instability.

4. The offsite transmission circuits have the capacity and capability to power the required loads during steady state, transient, and postulated events and accident conditions.

4. Analyses of the as-built offsite transmission circuits from the TN to the safety buses will be performed.

4. A report exists and concludes that the as-built offsite transmission circuits have the capacity and capability to power the required loads during steady state, transient, and postulated events and accident conditions.

5.a Independence between the offsite circuits and the onsite Class 1E electrical system and components is maintained.

5.a Tests and analyses on the as-built offsite circuits and onsite class 1E electrical system and components will be performed.

5.a There is electrical independence between the as-built offsite circuits are isolated fromand the onsite Class 1E electrical system and components.

5.b The offsite circuits are physically separated from the onsite Class 1E electrical system and components.

5.b Inspections of the as-built offsite circuits and onsite Class 1E electrical system and components will be performed.

5.b The as-built offsite circuits are physically separated from the as-built onsite Class 1E electrical system and components.

6. Lightning protection and grounding features are provided for the offsite circuits from the TN to the safety buses.

6. Inspection of the as-built offsite circuits from the TN to the safety buses will be performed.

6. Lightning protection and grounding features exist for the system and components of the offsite circuits from the TN to the safety buses.

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix A.4

Revision 145

7. MCR aAlarms and displays for monitoring the switchyard equipment status can be retrieved in the MCR.

7. Inspection will be performed for the retrievability of the as-built switchyard equipment status in the as-built MCR.

7. MCR aAlarms and displays for monitoring the switchyard equipment status can be retrieved in the as-built MCR.

8. If power through the preferred power supply is not available, the offsite electrical system has the capability to automatic fast transfer to the non-preferred power supply if available.

8. Inspection of the as-built offsite electrical system will be performed.

8. The as-built offsite electrical system is automatically transferred to the non-preferred power supply in power is not available through the preferred power supply.

9. The Sswitchyard agreement and protocols between the NPP and the TN system owner/operator/owner assess the risk and probability of a loss of offsite power due to performing maintenance activities on the electrical system.

9. Inspection of the switchyard agreement and protocols between the NPP and the TN owner/operator will be performed.

9. The switchyard agreement and protocols between the NPP and the TN owner/operator assess the risk and probability of a loss of offsite power due to performing maintenance activities on the electrical system.

10. The offsite electrical system (switchyard) design assesses the probability of losing electric power as a result of or coincident with, the loss of power generated by the nuclear unit, the loss of power from the TN, or the loss of the largest load.The probability of losing electric power from any of the remaining supplies as a result of, or coincident with, the loss of power generated by the nuclear unit, the loss of power from the TN, or the loss of power from the onsite electric power supplies, is minimized.

10. Analyses of the as-built offsite electrical system for transient stability will be performed.

10. A report exists and concludes that the as-built offsite electrical system design assesses the probability of losing electric power as a result of or coincident with the loss of power generated by the nuclear unit, the loss of power from the TN, or the loss of the largest load.A report exists and concludes that the probability of losing electric power from any of the remaining supplies as a result of, or coincident with the loss of power generated by the nuclear unit, the loss of power from the TN, or the loss of power from the onsite electric power supplies, is minimized.

Table A.4-1 (Sheet 2 of 2)Offsite Power System

(Portions Outside the Scope of the Certified Design)Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria


CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix A.5

Revision 146


PLANT-SPECIFIC PROCESS EFFLUENT RADIATION MONITORING AND SAMPLING (PERMS)

1. The PERMS includes the radiation monitors as identified in Table A.5-2.


Table A.5-1 specifies the ITAAC for the plant-specific PERMS.

Table A.5-1Process Effluent Radiation Monitoring and Sampling System


Table A.5-2Process Effluent Radiation Monitoring and Sampling System

Equipment Characteristics

Note 1: The monitor is located adjacent to Startup Generator Blowdown Equipment shown in FSAR Figure 1.2-1R (Sheet 2 of 2)

Note 2: The monitor is located adjacent to radwaste evaporator pond shown in FSAR Figure 1.2-1R (Sheet 1 of 2)


Acceptance Criteria

1. The PERMS includes the radiation monitors as identified in Table A.5-2.

1. An inspection will be performed of the as-built radiation monitors identified in Table A.5-2.

1. The as-built PERMS include the radiation monitors as identified in Table A.5-2.

PERMS Monitor Name

Detector Number Safety Related

Seismic Category I

Class 1E/Harsh

Location

Startup Steam Generator Blowdown Heat Exchanger Downstream Radiation Monitor

RMS-RE-110 No No No/No (Note 1)

Evaporation Pond Discharge Radiation Monitor

RMS-RE-111 No No No/No (Note 2)

RCOL2_11.05-2

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01208



Appendix A.6

Revision 147


FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM (PORTIONS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE CERTIFIED DESIGN)


1. The seismic standpipe system can be supplied from a seismic Category I water source (ESWS) with a capacity of at least 18,000 gallons.

2. The fire protection system water supply is from two separate, reliable freshwater sources (the two fire water storage tanks).


Table A.6-1 describes the ITAAC for the Fire Protection System (portions outside the scope of the certified design).

Table A.6-1Fire Protection System (Portions outside the Scope of the

Certified Design) Inspections, Test, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria


Acceptance Criteria

1. The seismic standpipe system can be supplied from a seismic Category I water source (ESWS) with a capacity of at least 18,000 gallons.

1. Tests and analyses will be performed on the as-built system to confirm the ability of the ESWS to supply water to the seismic standpipes system.

1. A report exists and concludes that the seismic standpipe system is supplied with water from the ESWS with a capacity of at least 18,000 gallons.

2. The fire protection system water supply is from two separate, reliable freshwater sources (the two fire water storage tanks).

2. Tests will be performed to confirm the ability of the as-built fire water storage tanks to separately provide water to the fire protection water supply system.

2. The fire protection system is supplied with freshwater from two separate reliable freshwater sources.

CTS-01174

Rev

isio

n 1

50

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

1 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

1.0

Ass

ign

me

nt

of

Res

po

nsi

bil

ity

– O

rga

niz

atio

nal

Co

ntr

ol

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

) –

Prim

ary

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

for

emer

gen

cy

resp

onse

by

the

nuc

lea

r fa

cilit

y lic

ense

e, a

nd b

y S

tate

and

loca

l or

gani

zatio

ns

with

in th

e E

PZ

s ha

ve

bee

n as

sign

ed, t

he e

me

rgen

cy

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

of th

e va

rious

su

ppor

ting

org

aniz

atio

ns h

ave

bee

n sp

ecifi

cally

est

abl

ish

ed, a

nd e

ach

pr

inci

ple

resp

onse

org

aniz

atio

n h

as

sta

ff to

res

pond

an

d to

au

gmen

t its

in

itia

l res

pon

se o

n a

cont

inu

ous

basi

s.

1.1

The

sta

ff ex

ists

to p

rovi

de

24-h

our

per

day

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

and

man

nin

g of

co

mm

uni

catio

ns li

nks,

incl

udin

g co

ntin

uou

s op

era

tions

for

a

prot

ract

ed

perio

d. [A

.1.e

, A.4

]

1.1

An

insp

ectio

n of

the

e

me

rgen

cy p

lan

proc

edu

res

will

b

e p

erfo

rmed

.

1.1

Em

erg

ency

pla

n pr

oced

ures

pr

ovid

e fo

r 24

-hou

r pe

r da

y em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

sta

ffing

an

d m

ann

ing

of c

omm

unic

atio

ns

links

, inc

ludi

ng

cont

inuo

us

ope

ratio

ns fo

r a

pro

tra

cted

pe

riod.

2.0

On

site

Em

erg

enc

y O

rgan

izat

ion

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(2

) –

On

-shi

ft fa

cilit

y lic

ense

e re

spon

sibi

litie

s fo

r em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

are

un

am

big

uou

sly

defin

ed, a

deq

uate

st

affi

ng to

pro

vide

initi

al f

aci

lity

acci

dent

res

pon

se in

key

func

tion

al

area

s is

mai

ntai

ned

at a

ll tim

es,

time

ly a

ugm

enta

tion

of r

esp

onse

ca

pabi

litie

s is

ava

ilab

le, a

nd th

e in

terf

aces

am

ong

va

rious

ons

ite

resp

onse

act

iviti

es a

nd o

ffsite

su

ppor

t an

d re

spon

se a

ctiv

itie

s a

re

spec

ifie

d.

2.1

The

sta

ff ex

ists

to p

rovi

de

min

imum

and

aug

men

ted

on

-shi

ft st

affin

g le

vels

, con

sist

ent

with

Tab

le B

-1 o

f N

UR

EG

-065

4/F

EM

A-R

EP

-1,

Rev

. 1. [

B.5

, B

.7]

2.1

An

insp

ectio

n of

the

e

me

rgen

cy p

lan

proc

edu

res

will

b

e p

erfo

rmed

.

2.1

Em

erg

ency

pla

n pr

oced

ures

pr

ovid

e m

inim

um a

nd

aug

me

nted

on

-sh

ift s

taffi

ng

leve

ls, c

onsi

sten

t with

Tab

le II

-2

of th

e C

om

anch

e P

eak

Nu

clea

r P

ower

Pla

nt U

nits

3 &

4

Com

bine

d Li

cens

e (C

OL)

A

pplic

atio

n E

mer

genc

y P

lan.

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

Rev

isio

n 1

51

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

3.0

Em

erg

ency

Res

po

nse

Su

pp

ort

an

d R

eso

urc

es

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(3

) –

Arr

ang

eme

nts

for

req

uest

ing

an

d e

ffe

ctiv

ely

usi

ng a

ssis

tanc

e re

sour

ces

ha

ve b

ee

n m

ad

e,

arra

nge

men

ts t

o a

cco

mm

od

ate

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal s

taff

at t

he

lice

nsee

’s n

ear

-site

Em

erge

ncy

O

pe

ratio

ns F

acili

ty h

ave

be

en

mad

e, a

nd o

ther

org

aniz

atio

ns

capa

ble

of

aug

me

ntin

g t

he

pla

nne

d re

spon

se h

ave

be

en

iden

tifie

d.

Not

use

d. P

rovi

ded

for

cons

iste

ncy

with

Reg

. Gui

de

1.20

6 T

able

C.II

.1-B

1 E

mer

genc

y P

lann

ing—

Gen

eric

In

spec

tion,

Tes

t, A

naly

sis,

an

d A

ccep

tanc

e C

riter

ia

(EP

-IT

AA

C)

ITA

AC

nu

mbe

ring

sche

me.

Not

use

d. P

rovi

ded

for

cons

iste

ncy

with

Reg

. Gui

de

1.20

6 T

able

C.II

.1-B

1 E

mer

genc

y P

lann

ing—

Gen

eric

In

spec

tion,

Tes

t, A

naly

sis,

an

d A

ccep

tanc

e C

riter

ia

(EP

-IT

AA

C)

ITA

AC

nu

mbe

ring

sche

me.

Not

use

d. P

rovi

ded

for

cons

iste

ncy

with

Reg

. Gui

de

1.20

6 T

able

C.II

.1-B

1 E

mer

genc

y P

lann

ing—

Gen

eric

In

spec

tion,

Tes

t, A

naly

sis,

an

d A

ccep

tanc

e C

riter

ia

(EP

-IT

AA

C)

ITA

AC

nu

mbe

ring

sche

me.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

2 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

Rev

isio

n 1

52

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

14.0

Em

erg

ency

Cla

ssi

fica

tio

n S

yste

m

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(4

) –

A s

tan

dard

em

erge

ncy

clas

sific

atio

n an

d ac

tion

leve

l sch

eme,

the

base

s o

f whi

ch

incl

ude

faci

lity

syst

em a

nd e

fflue

nt

para

me

ters

, is

in u

se b

y th

e n

ucle

ar

faci

lity

lice

nsee

, and

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal

resp

onse

pla

ns

call

for

relia

nce

on

info

rmat

ion

prov

ide

d b

y fa

cilit

y lic

ense

es fo

r d

ete

rmin

atio

ns

of

min

imum

initi

al o

ffsite

res

pons

e m

easu

res.

14.1

A s

tand

ard

emer

genc

y cl

assi

ficat

ion

and

em

erge

ncy

actio

n le

vel (

EA

L) s

chem

e ex

ists

, an

d id

entif

ies

faci

lity

syst

em a

nd

efflu

ent p

aram

eter

s co

nstit

utin

g th

e ba

ses

for

the

cla

ssifi

catio

n sc

hem

e. [D

.1**

]

[**D

.1 c

orr

espo

nds

to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

ev

alu

atio

n cr

iteria

.]

14.

1 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

he

cont

rol

roo

m, t

ech

nica

l su

ppo

rt c

ente

r (T

SC

), a

nd e

me

rgen

cy

ope

ratio

ns

faci

lity

(EO

F)

will

be

p

erfo

rme

d to

ver

ify th

at th

ey

have

dis

play

s fo

r re

trie

ving

fa

cilit

y sy

stem

and

effl

uent

pa

ram

eter

s in

spe

cific

E

mer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

(EA

Ls)

iden

tifie

d in

the

follo

win

g lis

t of

EA

Lsth

at c

ons

titu

te th

e b

ases

fo

r th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

sche

me

in A

ppe

ndi

x 1,

Sec

tion

5, o

f the

C

oma

nch

e P

eak

Un

its 3

an

d 4

CO

L E

mer

gen

cy P

lan:

EA

Ls

in E

mer

gen

cy P

lan

A

pp

end

ix 1

, Sec

tio

n 5

Abn

orm

al R

ad L

evel

s/R

adi

olog

ical

E

fflue

nt:

14.1

.1 A

re

port

exi

sts

that

co

nfirm

s tT

he s

peci

fic

para

me

ters

iden

tifie

d in

the

E

AL

s in

Em

erg

en

cy P

lan

A

pp

end

ix 1

, S

ect

ion

5 h

ave

bee

n re

trie

ved

and

disp

laye

d in

th

e co

ntro

l ro

om, T

SC

, and

EO

F.

14.1

.2 A

rep

ort e

xist

s th

at

conf

irms

tTh

e ra

nges

ava

ilabl

e in

th

e co

ntro

l ro

om, T

SC

, and

EO

F

enco

mp

asse

d th

e va

lues

for

the

spec

ific

para

me

ters

iden

tifie

d in

th

e E

AL

s in

Em

erg

en

cy P

lan

A

pp

end

ix 1

, S

ect

ion

5.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

3 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

53

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

1.1

(co

ntin

ued

)A

U1

EA

Ls #

1, 2

, A

U2

EA

L #1

, AA

1 E

ALs

#1,

2, A

A2

EA

L #2

, AA

3 E

AL

#1,

AS

1 E

AL

#1, A

G1

EA

L #1

Co

ld S

hutd

own/

Ref

uelin

g S

yste

m

Mal

func

tion:

CU

1, C

U2,

CU

3, C

U4,

CU

7, C

U8,

C

A1,

CA

3, C

A4,

CS

1, C

G1

Fis

sion

Pro

duct

Bar

rier

Thr

esho

lds:

Fue

l Cla

d B

arr

ier

Thr

esho

ld V

alue

s2.

Pri

mar

y C

oola

nt A

ctiv

ity L

evel

3. C

ore

Exi

t The

rmo

coup

le R

ead

ing

s4.

Rea

ctor

Ves

sel W

ater

Lev

el6.

Con

tain

men

t Rad

iatio

n M

onito

ring

RC

S B

arrie

r T

hres

hold

Val

ues

2. R

CS

Lea

k R

ate

4. S

G T

ube

Rup

ture

6. C

onta

inm

ent R

adia

tion

Mon

itorin

gC

ont

ainm

ent

Bar

rier

Thr

esho

ld

Val

ues

2. C

onta

inm

ent P

ress

ure

3. C

ore

Exi

t The

rmo

coup

le R

ead

ing

s4.

SG

Sec

onda

ry S

ide

Rel

ease

with

P

-to-

S L

eaka

ge5.

Con

tain

men

t Iso

latio

n F

ailu

re o

r B

ypas

s6.

Con

tain

men

t Rad

iatio

n M

onito

ring

Ha

zard

s a

nd O

ther

Con

ditio

ns

Affe

ctin

g P

lan

t Sa

fety

:H

U1

EA

L #1

, HA

1 E

AL

#1

Sys

tem

Mal

fun

ctio

ns:

SU

1, S

U4,

SU

8, S

A2,

SA

4, S

A5,

S

S1,

SS

2, S

S3,

SS

6, S

G1,

SG

2

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

4 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

Rev

isio

n 1

54

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

25.0

No

tifi

cati

on

Me

tho

ds

and

Pro

ced

ure

s

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(5

) –

Pro

ced

ures

ha

ve b

een

est

ablis

hed

for

notif

icat

ion,

by

the

lice

nsee

, of S

tate

an

d lo

cal r

espo

nse

orga

niz

atio

ns

and

for

notif

icat

ion

of e

mer

gen

cy

pers

onne

l by

all o

rgan

izat

ions

; th

e co

nten

t of i

nitia

l and

follo

w-u

p m

essa

ges

to r

espo

nse

or

gani

zatio

ns

and

the

pub

lic h

as

bee

n es

tabl

ish

ed; a

nd m

ean

s to

pr

ovid

e ea

rly n

otifi

catio

n an

d cl

ear

inst

ruct

ion

to th

e p

opu

lace

with

in

the

plum

e e

xpos

ure

path

way

E

mer

gen

cy P

lan

ning

Zon

e ha

ve

bee

n es

tabl

ish

ed

25.1

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o no

tify

resp

onsi

ble

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal

orga

niz

atio

ns

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es

afte

r th

e lic

ens

ee d

ecl

ares

an

emer

gen

cy. [

E.1

]

25.

1 A

test

will

be

perf

orm

ed o

f th

e ca

pab

ility

to b

egin

initi

al

not

ifica

tion

to S

tate

and

loca

l o

rgan

iza

tions

no

late

r th

an 1

5

min

utes

afte

r th

e Lu

min

ant

d

ecla

res

an e

me

rgen

cy.

25.1

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

con

firm

s co

mm

unic

atio

ns h

ave

been

es

tabl

ishe

d v

ia a

de

dica

ted

ci

rcui

t bet

wee

n th

e c

ont

rol r

oom

an

d th

e fo

llow

ing

ag

enci

es

and

no

tific

atio

ns

beg

an n

o la

ter

than

15

min

ute

s a

fter

the

de

cla

ratio

n o

f a

n em

erg

ency

:•

Som

erve

ll C

ount

y S

her

iff o

r D

ispa

tch

er•

Hoo

d C

oun

ty S

herif

f or

Dis

patc

her

•T

exa

s D

epar

tmen

t of P

ublic

S

afet

y

25.2

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o no

tify

emer

gen

cy r

esp

onse

pe

rso

nnel

. [E

.2]

25.

2 A

test

will

be

perf

orm

ed o

f th

e ca

pab

ilitie

s.25

.2 A

re

port

exi

sts

and

conc

lude

s th

at c

onfir

ms

notif

icat

ion

to m

obili

ze

CP

NP

Pth

e C

om

an

che

Pea

k U

nits

3 a

nd

4 em

erg

ency

re

spon

se o

rgan

izat

ion

ha

s b

een

perf

orm

ed.

NO

TE

: Con

firm

atio

n of

the

abi

lity

to m

obili

ze th

e C

om

anc

he P

eak

Uni

ts 3

and

4 e

mer

gen

cy

resp

onse

org

aniz

atio

n is

ad

dre

ssed

in A

ccep

tan

ce

Crit

erio

n 14

.1.1

.2.B

.1.b

.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

5 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

55

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

25.3

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o no

tify

and

pro

vide

inst

ruct

ion

s to

the

pop

ulac

e w

ithin

the

plum

e ex

posu

re E

PZ

. [E

.6]

25.

3 N

OT

E: T

he

requ

ired

test

is

incl

uded

in In

spec

tion

s, T

est

s,

Ana

lyse

s 81

4.1.

2 5.3

NO

TE

: The

mea

ns

to n

otify

an

d p

rovi

de in

stru

ctio

ns to

the

pop

ula

ce w

ithin

the

plu

me

ex

posu

re p

athw

ay

EP

Z a

re

add

ress

ed b

y A

cce

ptan

ce

Crit

eria

81

4.1.

1.2.

36.0

Em

erg

ency

Co

mm

un

icat

ion

s

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(6

) –

Pro

visi

ons

ex

ist f

or p

rom

pt c

omm

uni

catio

ns

amon

g p

rinci

pal

res

pon

se

orga

niza

tion

s to

em

erge

ncy

pers

onne

l an

d to

the

publ

ic.

36.1

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist f

or

com

mu

nica

tions

am

ong

the

cont

rol r

oom

, TS

C, E

OF

, pr

inci

pal S

tate

and

loca

l em

erge

ncy

op

erat

ion

s ce

nte

rs

(EO

Cs)

, and

rad

iolo

gic

al fi

eld

as

sess

men

t tea

ms.

[F.1

.d]

NO

TE

: Tie

r 1

of th

e U

S-A

PW

R

Des

ign

Con

trol

Doc

um

ent

(D

CD

), R

ev.

0, a

ddre

sses

this

E

P P

rogr

am

Ele

me

nt in

the

fo

llow

ing

Des

ign

Com

mitm

ent

s (D

C):

•T

able

.2.7

.6.1

0-1,

DC

#2

•T

able

2.9

-1, D

C #

7l

36.

1 A

test

of t

he

as-b

uilt

com

mun

icat

ions

sys

tem

will

be

per

form

ed.

NO

TE

: For

com

mun

ica

tions

a

mo

ngbe

twee

n th

e co

ntro

l roo

m,

and

TS

C ,

and

from

the

con

tro

l ro

om a

nd T

SC

to

the

EO

F,

prin

cipa

l Sta

te a

nd

loca

l e

me

rgen

cy o

pera

tions

ce

nte

rEO

Cs,

and

rad

iolo

gic

al

field

ass

essm

ent

team

s, T

ier

1 of

th

e U

S-A

PW

R D

esi

gn C

ontr

ol

Do

cum

ent (

DC

D),

Rev

. 0,

add

ress

es th

e fo

llow

ing

Insp

ectio

ns, T

ests

, A

naly

seis

:•

Tab

le.2

.7.6

.10-

1, It

emD

C #

2•

Tab

le 2

.9-1

, Ite

m #

7l

36.1

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

co

mm

unic

atio

ns

are

esta

blis

hed

bet

wee

n th

e E

OF

and

prin

cipa

l Sta

te a

nd

loca

l EO

Cs,

and

rad

iolo

gica

l fie

ld

asse

ssm

ent t

eam

s.

NO

TE

: For

com

mu

nica

tions

am

ong

betw

een

the

cont

rol

room

,and

TS

C, a

nd

from

the

cont

rol a

nd

TS

C to

the

EO

F,

prin

cipa

l Sta

te a

nd lo

cal

emer

genc

y o

pera

tions

ce

nter

EO

Cs,

an

d ra

diol

ogic

al

field

ass

essm

ent t

eam

s, T

ier 1

of

the

US

-AP

WR

Des

ign

Con

trol

D

ocum

ent

(D

CD

), R

ev. 0

, ad

dre

sses

the

follo

win

g A

ccep

tanc

e C

riter

iaon

:•

Tab

le.2

.7.6

.10-

1, It

em

DC

#2

•T

abl

e 2.

9-1

, Ite

m #

7l

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

6 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

56

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

36.2

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist f

or

com

mu

nica

tions

from

the

con

trol

ro

om, T

SC

, and

EO

F to

the

NR

C

hea

dqua

rter

s an

d r

egi

onal

offi

ce

EO

Cs

(incl

udi

ng e

sta

blis

hm

ent

of

the

Em

erge

ncy

Re

spon

se

Dat

a S

yste

m (

ER

DS

) b

etw

een

th

e on

site

com

pute

r sy

stem

and

th

e N

RC

Ope

ratio

ns C

ente

r.)

[F.1

.f]

NO

TE

: Tie

r 1

of th

e U

S-A

PW

R

Des

ign

Con

trol

Doc

um

ent

(D

CD

), R

ev.

0, a

ddre

sses

this

E

P P

rogr

am

Ele

me

nt in

the

fo

llow

ing

Des

ign

Com

mitm

ent

s (D

C):

•T

able

.2.7

.6.1

0-1,

DC

#3

•T

able

2.1

0-1

, DC

#4

36.

2 A

test

of t

he a

s-b

uilt

com

mun

icat

ions

sys

tem

will

be

per

form

ed.

NO

TE

: Fo

r com

mun

icat

ions

fro

m

the

cont

rol r

oom

, and

TS

C, a

nd

EO

F to

the

NR

C h

ead

quar

ters

a

nd r

egio

nalR

egio

n IV

offi

ce

EO

Cs

(inc

lud

ing

esta

blis

hmen

t o

f th

e E

RD

S [o

r its

su

cce

sso

r sy

stem

] bet

we

en th

e on

site

co

mpu

ter

syst

em a

nd th

e N

RC

O

pera

tions

Cen

ter)

,Tie

r 1

of th

e U

S-A

PW

R D

esi

gn C

ontr

ol

Do

cum

ent (

DC

D),

Rev

. 0,

add

ress

es th

e fo

llow

ing

Insp

ectio

ns, T

ests

, A

naly

seis

: •

Tab

le.2

.7.6

.10-

1, D

C #

3•

Tab

le 2

.10-

1, D

C #

4

36.2

A

rep

ort e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

co

mm

unic

atio

ns

are

esta

blis

hed

from

the

EO

F to

th

e N

RC

hea

dqu

arte

rs a

nd

Reg

ion

IV o

ffice

EO

Cs.

NO

TE

: Fo

r co

mm

unic

atio

ns

from

th

e co

ntro

l roo

m, a

nd T

SC

, and

E

OF

to th

e N

RC

he

adqu

arte

rs

and

re

gion

alR

egi

on IV

offi

ce

EO

Cs

(incl

udin

g es

tabl

ish

men

t of

the

ER

DS

[or

its

succ

esso

r sy

stem

] bet

wee

n th

e on

site

co

mpu

ter

syst

em a

nd th

e N

RC

O

per

atio

ns

Ce

nter

),T

ier

1 of

the

U

S-A

PW

R D

esig

n C

ontr

ol

Doc

ume

nt (

DC

D),

Rev

. 0,

add

ress

es th

e fo

llow

ing

Acc

epta

nce

Crit

eria

on:

•T

able

.2.7

.6.1

0-1,

DC

#3

•T

abl

e 2.

10-1

, DC

#4

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

7 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

Rev

isio

n 1

57

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

47.0

Pu

blic

Ed

uca

tio

n a

nd

In

form

atio

n

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(7)

– In

form

atio

n is

m

ade

ava

ilab

le to

the

pub

lic o

n a

pe

riodi

c ba

sis

on h

ow th

ey w

ill b

e

notif

ied

an

d w

hat

thei

r in

itia

l act

ion

s sh

ould

be

in a

n e

me

rgen

cy (

e.g.

, lis

teni

ng to

a lo

cal b

road

cast

sta

tion

and

rem

ain

ing

indo

ors)

, the

pr

inci

pal p

oin

ts o

f con

tact

with

the

new

s m

edia

for

diss

em

inat

ion

of

info

rmat

ion

dur

ing

an

em

erge

ncy

(in

clu

ding

the

phy

sica

l lo

catio

n or

lo

catio

ns)

are

est

abl

ish

ed in

ad

vanc

e, a

nd p

roce

dur

es fo

r co

ordi

nate

d di

sse

min

atio

n o

f in

form

atio

n to

the

pub

lic a

re

esta

blis

hed.

47.1

Th

e lic

ense

e ha

s pr

ovid

ed

spac

e w

hich

ma

y be

use

d fo

r a

limite

d nu

mb

er o

f the

ne

ws

me

dia

at th

e E

OF

. [G

.3.b

]

47.

1 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

he

Join

t In

form

atio

n C

ent

er w

ill b

e pe

rfor

me

d to

ver

ify th

at s

pace

is

pro

vide

d fo

r a

limite

d n

um

ber

of

the

new

s m

edia

.

47.1

A r

epor

t exi

sts

that

con

firm

s tT

he J

oint

Info

rmat

ion

Cen

ter

has

spac

e fo

r ap

pro

xim

atel

y 75

m

edia

per

sonn

elbe

en lo

cate

d in

th

e G

ranb

ury

City

Ha

ll at

116

W.

Brid

ge S

tree

t, G

ranb

ury,

TX

.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

8 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

58

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

58.0

Em

erg

ency

Fac

iliti

es a

nd

Eq

uip

men

t

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(8

) –

Ade

qua

te

emer

genc

y fa

cilit

ies

and

eq

uip

me

nt

to s

uppo

rt th

e em

erg

ency

re

spon

se

are

prov

ided

an

d m

ain

tain

ed.

5 8.1

Th

e lic

ense

e ha

s es

tabl

ish

ed a

tech

nica

l sup

port

ce

nter

(T

SC

) an

d on

site

op

era

tions

sup

port

cen

ter

(OS

C).

[H.1

]

NO

TE

: For

the

TS

C, T

ier

1 o

f th

e U

S-A

PW

R D

esig

n C

ontr

ol

Doc

umen

t (D

CD

), R

ev. 0

, ad

dre

sses

this

EP

Pro

gram

E

lem

ent i

n th

e fo

llow

ing

De

sign

C

omm

itmen

ts (

DC

):•

Tab

le 2

.5.4

-2, D

C #

1•

Tab

le.2

.7.6

.10-

1, D

C #

4•

Tab

le 2

.9-1

, DC

#7k

•T

able

2.1

0-1

, DC

s #1

, 2,

3•

Tab

le 2

.7.5

.4-3

, DC

#8

•T

able

2.7

.6.1

0-1,

DC

s #1

, 2

and

3•

Tab

le 2

.5.4

-2, D

C #

1

58.

1.1

NO

TE

: For

the

TS

C, T

ier

1 o

f th

e U

S-A

PW

R D

esig

n

Co

ntro

l Doc

umen

t (D

CD

), R

ev.

0, a

ddre

sses

the

follo

win

g In

spec

tions

, Tes

ts,

Ana

lyse

s:

•T

able

2.5

.4-2

, DC

#1

•T

able

.2.7

.6.1

0-1,

DC

#4

•T

able

2.9

-1, D

C #

7k

•T

able

2.1

0-1,

DC

s #

1, 2

, 3•

Tab

le 2

.7.5

.4-3

, DC

#8

•T

able

2.7

.6.1

0-1,

DC

s #1

, 2

and

3•

Tab

le 2

.5.4

-2, D

C #

1

58.

1.2

An

insp

ectio

n of

the

a

s-b

uilt

OS

C w

ill b

e pe

rfor

med

.

58.1

.1 F

or

the

TS

C, T

ier

1 o

f th

e U

S-A

PW

R D

esig

n C

ontr

ol

Doc

ume

nt (

DC

D),

Rev

. 0,

add

ress

es th

e fo

llow

ing

Acc

epta

nce

Crit

eria

: •

Ta

ble

2.5.

4-2,

DC

#1

•T

abl

e.2.

7.6.

10-1

, DC

#4

•T

abl

e 2.

9-1

, DC

#7k

•T

abl

e 2.

10-1

, DC

s #1

, 2, 3

•T

abl

e 2.

7.5.

4-3,

DC

#8

•T

abl

e 2.

7.6.

10-1

, DC

s #1

, 2

and

3•

Ta

ble

2.5.

4-2,

DC

#1

58.1

.2.1

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s th

at

conf

irms

tThe

OS

C w

as

in a

has

bee

n lo

cate

dio

n se

para

tely

fro

m

the

cont

rol r

oom

and

TS

C.

58.1

.2.2

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s th

at

conf

irms

tha

t OS

C v

oice

cC

omm

unic

atio

n eq

uip

men

t is

in

stal

ledh

as b

een

prov

ided

in th

e O

SC

, and

voi

ce tr

ansm

issi

on

and

re

cept

ion

are

have

be

en

acco

mpl

ishe

d w

ith:.

•C

ontr

ol R

oom

•T

SC

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

9 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

59

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

58.2

Th

e lic

ense

e ha

s es

tabl

ish

ed a

n e

me

rgen

cy

ope

ratio

ns fa

cilit

y (E

OF

). [H

.2]

58.

2 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

he

EO

F

will

be

perf

orm

ed.

58.2

.1 A

re

port

exi

sts

that

co

nfirm

s tT

he

EO

F h

asd

at l

east

24

3 s

qua

re m

eter

s (2

,62

5 sq

uare

fee

t).

5 8.2

.2.1

A r

epor

t exi

sts

that

co

nfirm

s tT

he E

OF

me

ets

the

follo

win

g h

abi

tab

ility

crit

eria

:•

EO

F is

con

stru

cted

to m

eet

Te

xas

Bu

ildin

g C

ode

•P

rote

ctio

n fa

ctor

(fr

om d

irect

ra

diat

ion

expo

sure

) of

gre

ater

th

an o

r eq

ual

to 5

in a

reas

w

here

dos

e as

sess

men

ts,

com

mun

ica

tions

, and

dec

isio

n m

akin

g ta

ke p

lace

•V

entil

atio

n sy

stem

has

is

olat

ion

with

HE

PA

filte

rs•

A b

acku

p E

OF

is lo

cate

d w

ithin

10

to 2

0 m

iles

of th

e T

SC

8.2.

2.2

The

bac

kup

EO

F is

lo

cate

d w

ithin

10

to 2

0 m

iles

of

the

TS

C.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

10 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

60

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

58.2

.3 F

or th

e E

OF

, Tie

r 1

of th

e U

S-A

PW

R D

esig

n C

ontr

ol

Doc

ume

nt (

DC

D),

Rev

. 0,

addr

esse

s th

e fo

llow

ing

Acc

epta

nce

Crit

eria

: •

Ta

ble

2.5.

4-2,

DC

#1

•T

abl

e.2.

7.6.

10-1

, Ite

ms

#2, 3

•T

abl

e 2.

9-1

, Ite

m #

7l.

•T

abl

e 2.

10-1

, Ite

m #

4N

ote:

EO

F c

omm

unic

atio

ns w

ith

the

cont

rol r

oom

, TS

C, t

he N

RC

he

adq

uar

ters

an

d R

egio

n IV

of

fice

EO

Cs

and

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal

age

ncie

s ar

e ad

dres

sed

in

Acc

epta

nce

Crit

eria

6.1

.2 a

nd

6.2.

2.

8.2.

4 T

he m

eans

hav

e be

en

esta

blis

hed

in th

e E

OF

to

acqu

ire, d

ispl

ay,

and

eva

lua

te

radi

olog

ical

, met

eoro

log

ical

, an

d pl

ant s

yste

m d

ata

pert

inen

t to

dete

rmin

ing

offs

ite p

rote

ctiv

e

mea

sure

s

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

11 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

61

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

69.0

Acc

iden

t A

sse

ssm

ent

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(9

) –

Ade

qua

te

met

hods

, sys

tem

s, a

nd

equ

ipm

ent

for

asse

ssin

g an

d m

onito

ring

actu

al

or p

oten

tial o

ffsite

con

sequ

enc

es o

f a

radi

olo

gic

al e

mer

genc

y co

nditi

on

are

in u

se.

69.1

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o pr

ovid

e in

itia

l and

co

ntin

uing

rad

iolo

gica

l as

sess

men

t thr

oug

hout

the

co

urse

of a

n ac

cide

nt. [

I.2]

69.

1 A

test

of t

he e

me

rgen

cy

pla

n w

ill b

e co

nduc

ted

by

per

form

ing

an e

xerc

ise

or

drill

to

verif

y th

e ca

pab

ility

to p

erf

orm

ra

diol

ogic

al a

sses

smen

t.

69.1

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

con

firm

s an

ex

erci

se o

r dr

ill h

as b

een

acco

mpl

ishe

d in

clud

ing

use

of

sele

cted

mon

itorin

g pa

ram

eter

s id

ent

ified

in th

e E

AL

s in

E

mer

gen

cy P

lan

Ap

pe

nd

ix 1

, S

ecti

on

5, t

o as

sess

sim

ula

ted

deg

rade

d p

lan

t and

initi

ate

prot

ectiv

e ac

tion

s in

acc

ord

ance

w

ith th

e fo

llow

ing

crite

ria:

A. A

ccid

ent

Ass

essm

ent a

nd

Cla

ssifi

catio

n1.

Initi

atin

g co

nditi

ons

iden

tifie

d, E

ALs

par

amet

ers

dete

rmin

ed, a

nd th

e em

erge

ncy

corr

ect

ly

clas

sifie

d th

roug

hout

the

dri

ll.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

12 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

62

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

69.1

(co

ntin

ued)

B. R

adi

olog

ica

l Ass

essm

ent

and

Con

trol

1. O

nsite

rad

iolo

gica

l sur

veys

pe

rfor

med

an

d sa

mpl

es

colle

cte

d.2.

Rad

iatio

n ex

posu

re to

em

erge

ncy

wor

kers

m

onito

red

and

cont

rolle

d.3.

Fie

ld m

oni

torin

g te

ams

asse

mbl

ed a

nd d

eplo

yed.

4. F

ield

team

dat

a co

llect

ed

and

dis

sem

ina

ted.

5. D

ose

proj

ect

ions

de

velo

ped.

6. T

he d

eci

sion

wh

ethe

r to

is

sue

radi

opr

otec

tive

dru

gs to

Lu

min

ant e

mer

gen

cy

wor

kers

mad

e.7.

Pro

tect

ive

actio

n

reco

mm

end

atio

ns d

evel

ope

d an

d c

om

mun

icat

ed to

ap

pro

pria

te a

uth

oriti

es.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

13 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

63

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

69.2

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o de

term

ine

the

sou

rce

term

of

rele

ase

s o

f rad

ioac

tive

mat

eria

l w

ithin

pla

nt s

yste

ms,

an

d th

e m

agn

itud

e of

the

rele

ase

of

radi

oac

tive

ma

teria

ls b

ase

d o

n pl

ant s

yste

m p

aram

eter

s an

d ef

fluen

t mo

nito

rs. [

I.3]

69.

2 A

n an

aly

sis

of e

me

rgen

cy

pla

n im

plem

entin

g p

roce

dure

s w

ill b

e pe

rfor

med

.

6 9.2

A

rep

ort

exis

ts t

hat

conf

irms

a m

etho

dolo

gyT

he

mea

ns h

as

been

est

ablis

hed

to

dete

rmin

e th

e so

urce

term

of

rele

ases

of r

adio

activ

e m

ater

ials

w

ithin

pla

nt s

yste

ms

a nd

the

m

agni

tud

e o

f th

e r

ele

ase

of

rad

ioa

ctiv

e m

ate

rials

ba

sed

on p

lant

sys

tem

pa

ram

eter

s an

d e

fflu

ent

mo

nito

rs..

6 9.3

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o co

ntin

uou

sly

asse

ss th

e im

pact

of

the

rele

ase

of r

adi

oact

ive

m

ate

rials

to

the

envi

ronm

ent,

acco

untin

g fo

r th

e re

latio

nshi

p be

twee

n ef

fluen

t mo

nito

r re

adin

gs, a

nd o

nsite

and

offs

ite

expo

sure

s a

nd c

onta

min

atio

n fo

r va

riou

s m

eteo

rolo

gica

l co

nditi

ons.

[I.4

]

69.

3

An

anal

ysis

of e

mer

genc

y p

lan

impl

emen

ting

pro

cedu

res

will

be

perf

orm

ed.

69.3

A r

epor

t exi

sts

that

con

firm

s a

met

hod

olo

gyT

he m

ean

s ha

s be

en

prov

ided

to c

ontin

uou

sly

asse

ss t

he im

pact

of

the

rele

ase

of

radi

oa

ctiv

e

mat

eria

ls to

the

en

viro

nm

ent,

ac

coun

ting

fore

stab

lish

the

rela

tions

hip

bet

wee

n e

fflue

nt

mon

itor

read

ing

s, a

nd o

nsite

and

of

fsite

exp

osur

es a

nd

cont

amin

atio

n fo

r va

rious

m

eteo

rolo

gica

l co

nditi

ons

.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

14 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

64

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

69.4

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o ac

quire

an

d e

valu

ate

met

eoro

logi

cal

info

rmat

ion.

[I.5

]

69.

4 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

he c

ontr

ol

roo

m, T

SC

, and

EO

F w

ill b

e p

erfo

rme

d to

ver

ify th

at th

e fo

llow

ing

me

teor

olo

gica

l dat

a is

a

vaila

ble:

-W

ind

spe

ed (

at 1

0 m

an

d 6

0 m

)-

Win

d d

irect

ion

(at 1

0 m

an

d -

60

m)

-A

ir te

mpe

ratu

re (

at 1

0 m

and

6

0 m

)

69.4

A r

epor

t exi

sts

that

con

firm

s tT

he s

peci

fied

met

eoro

logi

cal

data

was

ava

ilab

le a

t the

con

trol

ro

om, T

SC

, and

EO

F.

9.4.

2 T

he m

ean

s e

xist

to p

rovi

de

th

e sp

ecifi

ed m

eteo

rolo

gica

l dat

a to

the

offs

ite N

RC

cen

ter

and

the

S

tate

of T

exa

s E

OC

.

69.5

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ist t

o m

ake

rapi

d a

sse

ssm

ent

s of

act

ual

or

pote

ntia

l ma

gnitu

de

and

loca

tions

of a

ny

rad

iolo

gica

l ha

zard

s th

rou

gh li

qui

d or

ga

seo

us r

ele

ase

pat

hway

s,

incl

udi

ng a

ctiv

atio

n, n

otifi

catio

n m

ean

s, fi

eld

team

co

mp

ositi

on,

tran

spor

tatio

n, c

omm

unic

atio

n,

mo

nito

ring

equi

pmen

t, a

nd

estim

ate

d d

eplo

yme

nt ti

mes

. [I.8

]

69.

5 A

n an

aly

sis

of e

me

rgen

cy

pla

n im

plem

entin

g p

roce

dure

s w

ill b

e pe

rfor

med

.

69.5

A

rep

ort

exis

ts t

hat

conf

irms

a m

etho

dolo

gyT

he

mea

ns h

as

been

est

ablis

hed

to

prov

ide

rapi

d a

sse

ssm

ent

of t

he

actu

al o

r po

ten

tial m

agni

tude

an

d lo

catio

ns

of a

ny r

adio

log

ical

ha

zard

s th

rou

gh li

qui

d o

r ga

seou

s re

lea

se p

athw

ays.

69.6

Th

e ca

pab

ility

exi

sts

to

dete

ct a

nd m

easu

re r

adio

iodi

ne

conc

entr

atio

ns in

air

in th

e p

lum

e

expo

sure

EP

Z, a

s lo

w a

s 10

-7

μC

i/cc

(mic

rocu

ries

per

cubi

c ce

ntim

eter

) u

nde

r fie

ld

cond

ition

s. [I

.9]

69.

6 A

test

of L

umin

ant f

ield

su

rve

y in

stru

men

tatio

n w

ill b

e pe

rfor

me

d to

ver

ify th

e ca

pabi

lity

to d

etec

t airb

orn

e co

ncen

trat

ion

s a

s lo

w a

s 1

E-0

7 m

icro

curie

s pe

r cu

bic

ce

ntim

eter

s.

69.6

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

con

firm

s in

stru

men

tatio

n us

ed fo

r m

onito

ring

I-1

31 to

det

ect

airb

orne

con

cent

ratio

ns a

s lo

w

as 1

E-0

7 m

icro

curie

s p

er c

ubi

c ce

ntim

eter

s ha

s be

en

prov

ide

d.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

15 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15C

TS

-011

74

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

65

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

69.7

The

me

ans

exis

t to

est

ima

te

inte

gra

ted

dos

e fr

om

the

pr

oje

cted

and

act

ual d

ose

rate

s,

and

for

com

parin

g th

ese

es

timat

es w

ith th

e E

PA

pr

otec

tive

actio

n gu

ides

(P

AG

s).

[I.10

]

69.

7 A

n a

naly

sis

of e

mer

gen

cy

pla

n im

plem

entin

g p

roce

dure

s w

ill b

e pe

rfor

med

to v

erify

that

a

met

hodo

logy

is p

rovi

ded

to

esta

blis

h m

eans

for

rela

ting

con

tam

inat

ion

leve

ls a

nd

airb

orne

ra

dioa

ctiv

ity le

vels

to

dose

rat

es a

nd g

ross

ra

dio

act

ivity

me

asur

emen

ts fo

r th

e fo

llow

ing

isot

opes

– K

r-88

, R

u-1

06, I

-131

, I-1

32, I

-133

, I-

134

, I-1

35, T

e-1

32, X

e-1

33,

Xe-

135

, Cs-

134

, Cs-

137,

C

e-1

44.

69.7

A r

epor

t exi

sts

tha

t con

firm

s tT

he m

eans

for

rela

ting

cont

amin

atio

n le

vels

and

ai

rbor

ne r

adio

activ

ity le

vels

to

dose

rat

es a

nd g

ross

ra

dioa

ctiv

ity m

easu

rem

ents

for

the

spec

ifie

d is

otop

es h

as

been

es

tabl

ishe

d to

mak

e ra

pid

asse

ssm

ents

of a

ctua

l or

pote

ntia

l mag

nitu

de a

nd

loca

tions

of a

ny

rad

iolo

gica

l ha

zard

s th

rou

gh li

qui

d o

r ga

seou

s re

lea

se p

athw

ays.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

16 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

Rev

isio

n 1

66

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

710

.0 P

rote

ctiv

e R

esp

on

se

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

0) –

A r

ang

e o

f pr

otec

tive

actio

ns h

as

been

de

velo

ped

for

the

plu

me

exp

osur

e

EP

Z fo

r em

erge

ncy

wo

rke

rs a

nd th

e pu

blic

. In

deve

lop

ing

this

ran

ge o

f ac

tions

, con

sid

erat

ion

has

bee

n gi

ven

to e

vacu

atio

n, s

helte

ring

, and

, as

a s

upp

lem

ent t

o th

ese,

the

prop

hyla

ctic

use

of p

otas

sium

io

did

e (K

I), a

s ap

pro

pria

te.

Gu

idel

ine

s fo

r th

e c

hoi

ce o

f pr

otec

tive

actio

ns d

uri

ng a

n

emer

genc

y, c

onsi

sten

t with

Fe

dera

l gu

idan

ce, a

re d

eve

lop

ed a

nd in

pl

ace

, and

pro

tect

ive

actio

ns fo

r th

e

ing

estio

n ex

pos

ure

EP

Z a

ppro

pria

te

to th

e lo

cale

ha

ve b

een

dev

elo

ped.

710.

1 T

he m

eans

exi

st to

wa

rn

and

ad

vise

ons

ite in

divi

dua

ls o

f an

em

erge

ncy,

incl

udin

g th

ose

in

area

s co

ntro

lled

by th

e o

pera

tor,

in

clu

ding

:[J.1

]a.

em

plo

yee

s no

t ha

ving

em

erge

ncy

ass

ignm

ents

;b.

vis

itors

;c.

con

trac

tor

and

con

stru

ctio

n

pers

onne

l; an

dd.

oth

er

per

sons

who

may

be

in

the

publ

ic a

cces

s a

reas

, on

or

pass

ing

thro

ugh

the

site

, or

with

in th

e ow

ner

co

ntro

lled

area

.

710

.1 A

test

of t

he o

nsite

w

arn

ing

and

com

mun

ica

tions

ca

pab

ility

will

be

perf

orm

ed

dur

ing

a d

rill o

r ex

erci

se.

7 10

.1.1

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

co

nfirm

s th

at,

durin

g a

drill

or

exe

rcis

e,

notif

icat

ion

and

inst

ruct

ion

s w

ere

prov

ided

to o

nsite

wor

kers

and

vi

sito

rs, w

ithin

the

Pro

tect

ed

Are

a, o

ver

the

pla

nt p

ublic

an

noun

cem

ent s

yste

m.

710

.1.2

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

co

nfirm

s th

at,

durin

g a

dril

l or

exer

cise

, aud

ible

w

arni

ngs

wer

e pr

ovi

ded

to

ind

ivid

ual

s o

utsi

de th

e P

rote

cte

d A

rea,

but

with

in th

e O

wn

er

Con

trol

led

Are

a.

710

.1.3

A r

epo

rt e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

co

nfirm

s th

at,

durin

g a

drill

or

exe

rcis

e,

ind

ivid

ual

s w

ithin

Squ

aw C

reek

P

ark

wer

e no

tifie

d by

Squ

aw

Cre

ek P

ark

pers

onne

l of t

he

app

ropr

iate

pro

tect

ive

res

pon

se.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

17 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15C

TS

-011

74

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

67

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

11.0

Ra

dio

log

ical

Exp

os

ure

Co

ntr

ol

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

1) –

Mea

ns fo

r co

ntro

lling

rad

iolo

gica

l exp

osur

es,

in a

n e

me

rgen

cy, a

re e

sta

blis

hed

fo

r em

erg

ency

wor

kers

. The

mea

ns

for

con

tro

llin

g ra

dio

logi

cal

expo

sure

s sh

all i

nclu

de e

xpos

ure

guid

elin

es c

onsi

sten

t with

EP

A

Em

erg

ency

Wo

rke

r a

nd L

ifesa

ving

A

ctiv

ity P

AG

s.

11.1

The

me

ans

exis

ts to

pro

vide

on

site

rad

iatio

n pr

ote

ctio

n. [K

.2]

11.

1 A

n a

naly

sis

of s

ite

pro

cedu

res

will

be

perf

orm

ed.

11.1

Site

pro

cedu

res

prov

ide

the

mea

ns fo

r o

nsite

rad

iatio

n pr

otec

tion

.

11.2

The

me

ans

exis

ts to

pro

vide

24

-ho

ur-p

er-d

ay

cap

abili

ty to

de

term

ine

the

dose

s re

ceiv

ed b

y em

erge

ncy

pe

rson

nel a

nd

ma

inta

in d

ose

reco

rds.

[K.3

]

11.

2 A

n a

naly

sis

of e

mer

gen

cy

pla

n pr

oce

dure

s w

ill b

e p

erfo

rme

d.

11.2

Em

erge

ncy

pla

n pr

oced

ures

pro

vid

e th

e m

ean

s fo

r 24

- h

our-

per-

day

cap

abi

lity

to

dete

rmin

e th

e do

ses

rece

ive

d by

em

erge

ncy

per

sonn

el a

nd

mai

ntai

n do

se r

ecor

ds.

11.3

Th

e m

ean

s ex

ists

to

deco

nta

min

ate

relo

cate

d on

site

an

d e

me

rgen

cy p

erso

nne

l, in

clu

ding

was

te d

ispo

sal.

[K.5

.b,

K.7

]

11.

3 A

n a

naly

sis

of e

mer

gen

cy

pla

n pr

oce

dure

s w

ill b

e p

erfo

rme

d.

11.3

Em

erge

ncy

pla

n pr

oced

ures

pro

vid

e a

me

ans

to

deco

ntam

inat

e re

loca

ted

onsi

te

and

em

erg

ency

per

sonn

el,

incl

udin

g w

aste

dis

posa

l.

11.4

The

me

ans

exis

ts to

pro

vide

on

site

an

d co

ntam

inat

ion

con

trol

m

eas

ures

. [K

.6]

11.

4 A

n a

naly

sis

of s

ite

pro

cedu

res

will

be

perf

orm

ed.

11.4

Site

pro

cedu

res

prov

ide

the

mea

ns fo

r o

nsite

con

tam

inat

ion

cont

rol m

easu

res.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

18 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

68

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

12.0

Med

ica

l an

d P

ub

lic H

ealt

h S

up

po

rt

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

2) –

A

rra

nge

me

nts

are

mad

e fo

r med

ical

se

rvic

es fo

r co

nta

min

ated

, inj

ured

in

div

idu

als.

12.1

Arr

ang

em

ent

s ha

ve b

een

im

ple

me

nted

for

loca

l and

ba

ckup

hos

pita

l an

d m

edi

cal

serv

ices

hav

ing

the

cap

abili

ty fo

r ev

alu

atio

n of

rad

iatio

n ex

posu

re

and

up

take

. [L.

1]

12.

1 A

n a

naly

sis

of le

tters

of

agr

eem

ent w

ill b

e pe

rfor

med

.12

.1 A

rran

gem

ents

hav

e be

en

impl

em

ent

ed w

ith L

ake

Gra

nbu

ry

Med

ica

l Cen

ter

(LG

MC

) in

G

ranb

ury,

Tex

as a

nd

the

Tex

as

Hea

lth H

arr

is M

etho

dis

t Hos

pita

l C

lebu

rne

(For

mer

ly W

alls

R

egio

nal H

ospi

tal)

in C

lebu

rne,

T

exa

s fo

r ev

alua

tion

of r

adia

tion

expo

sure

and

up

take

.

12.2

The

mea

ns e

xist

s fo

r on

site

fir

st a

id c

apab

ility

. [L

.2]

12.

2 A

n a

naly

sis

of e

mer

gen

cy

pla

n pr

oce

dure

s w

ill b

e p

erfo

rme

d.

12.2

Ons

ite p

roce

dure

s p

rovi

de

for

ons

ite fi

rst a

id c

apab

ility

.

12.3

Arr

ang

em

ent

s ha

ve b

een

im

ple

me

nted

for

tran

spo

rtin

g vi

ctim

s of

ra

diol

ogic

al a

ccid

ent

s,

incl

udi

ng c

ont

amin

ated

inju

red

indi

vidu

als,

from

the

site

to

offs

ite m

edic

al s

uppo

rt fa

cilit

ies.

[L

.4]

12.

3 A

n a

naly

sis

of le

tters

of

agr

eem

ent w

ill b

e pe

rfor

med

.12

.3 A

rran

gem

ents

hav

e be

en

impl

em

ent

ed fo

r tr

ansp

ortin

g vi

ctim

s of

rad

iolo

gic

al a

ccid

ent

s,

incl

udin

g co

ntam

ina

ted

inju

red

ind

ivid

ual

s, fr

om th

e si

te to

of

fsite

med

ical

sup

por

t fac

ilitie

s.

13.0

Exe

rcis

es a

nd

Dri

lls

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

3) –

Gen

era

l pl

ans

for

reco

very

and

ree

ntry

are

de

velo

ped.

Not

use

d. P

rovi

ded

for

cons

iste

ncy

with

Reg

. Gu

ide

1.20

6 T

able

C.II

.1-B

1 E

me

rgen

cy P

lan

ning

—G

ener

ic

Insp

ectio

n, T

est

, An

alys

is, a

nd

Acc

ept

ance

Crit

eria

(E

P-I

TA

AC

) IT

AA

C n

umbe

ring

sche

me.

No

t use

d. P

rovi

ded

for

con

sist

enc

y w

ith R

eg. G

uide

1

.20

6 T

abl

e C

.II.1

-B1

Em

erge

ncy

Pla

nnin

g—G

ener

ic

Insp

ect

ion,

Tes

t, A

naly

sis,

an

d A

ccep

tan

ce C

riter

ia (

EP

-IT

AA

C)

ITA

AC

nu

mb

erin

g sc

hem

e.

Not

use

d. P

rovi

ded

for

cons

iste

ncy

with

Reg

. Gui

de

1.20

6 T

able

C.II

.1-B

1

Em

erge

ncy

Pla

nni

ng—

Ge

neric

In

spec

tion

, Te

st, A

nal

ysis

, and

A

ccep

tanc

e C

riter

ia (

EP

-IT

AA

C)

ITA

AC

num

berin

g sc

hem

e.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

19 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

69

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

814

.0 E

xerc

ises

an

d D

rills

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

4) –

Per

iodi

c ex

erci

ses

are

(will

be)

con

duct

ed

to

eval

uate

ma

jor

port

ion

s o

f em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

cap

abili

ties,

pe

riodi

c dr

ills

are

(w

ill b

e)

cond

ucte

d to

de

velo

p a

nd m

ain

tain

ke

y sk

ills,

and

def

icie

nci

es id

entif

ied

as

a r

esu

lt o

f exe

rcis

es

or

drill

s ar

e (w

ill b

e) c

orr

ect

ed.

814.

1 Li

cens

ee c

ondu

cts

a

full-

part

icip

atio

n e

xerc

ise

to

eval

uat

e m

ajo

r po

rtio

ns

of

emer

gen

cy r

esp

onse

ca

pab

ilitie

s, w

hich

incl

udes

pa

rtic

ipa

tion

by e

ach

Sta

te a

nd

loca

l age

ncy

with

in th

e p

lum

e ex

posu

re E

PZ

, an

d ea

ch S

tate

w

ithin

the

inge

stio

n c

ontr

ol E

PZ

. [N

.1]

814

.1 A

full-

part

icip

atio

n e

xerc

ise

(tes

t) w

ill b

e c

ondu

cted

w

ithin

the

spec

ified

tim

e pe

riods

o

f App

end

ix E

to 1

0 C

FR

Par

t 5

0.

814

.1.1

.1 A

rep

ort e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

con

firm

s an

ex

erci

se w

as

con

duct

ed w

ithin

th

e sp

ecifi

ed

time

perio

ds o

f A

ppe

ndix

E to

10

CF

R P

art 5

0,

onsi

te e

xerc

ise

obj

ect

ive

s w

ere

m

et, a

nd th

ere

wer

e no

un

corr

ect

ed o

nsite

exe

rcis

e de

ficie

ncie

s.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

20 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15C

TS

-011

74

Rev

isio

n 1

70

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

814

.1.1

.2 A

rep

ort e

xist

s an

d co

ndlu

des

that

con

firm

s th

e fo

llow

ing

exe

rcis

e ob

ject

ive

s w

ere

satis

fied

by

mee

ting

the,

in

clud

ing

spec

ific

perf

orm

ance

acce

ptan

ce c

riter

ia,

add

ress

ed e

ach

of t

he fo

llow

ing

Em

erge

ncy

Pla

nni

ng

(EP

) P

rogr

am E

lem

ents

:-

Em

erge

ncy

Cla

ssifi

catio

n-

Not

ifica

tion

and

Em

erge

ncy

C

omm

unic

atio

ns-

Em

erge

ncy

Pub

lic

Info

rmat

ion

-E

mer

gen

cy F

acili

ties

and

E

quip

men

t-

Acc

iden

t Ass

essm

ent

-P

rote

ctiv

e R

espo

nse

and

P

rote

ctiv

e A

ctio

n

Rec

omm

enda

tion

s-

Rad

iolo

gica

l Exp

osu

re

Con

trol

-R

ecov

ery

an

d R

e-E

ntry

A.

Acc

iden

t Ass

essm

ent a

nd

Cla

ssifi

catio

n

1. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

id

ent

ify in

itiat

ing

con

ditio

ns,

de

term

ine

em

erge

ncy

act

ion

le

vel (

EA

L) p

ara

met

ers,

and

co

rrec

tly c

lass

ify th

e em

erge

ncy

thro

ugho

ut th

e ex

erci

se.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

21 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

71

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

a.D

eter

min

e th

e co

rrec

t em

erge

ncy

clas

sific

atio

n le

vel b

ased

on

even

ts

whi

ch w

ere

in p

rog

ress

, co

nsid

erin

g p

ast e

vent

s an

d th

eir

imp

act o

n th

e

curr

ent c

ondi

tions

, with

in

15 m

inu

tes

from

the

tim

e th

e in

itia

ting

cond

ition

(s)

or E

AL

is id

entif

ied

.

B. N

otifi

catio

ns

1. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

al

ert

, not

ify a

nd

mo

biliz

e si

te

emer

genc

y re

spon

se p

ers

onne

l.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.C

ompl

ete

the

des

ign

ated

ac

tion

s in

acc

ord

ance

w

ith e

mer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s an

d p

erfo

rm

the

ann

ounc

em

ent

with

in

15 m

inu

tes

of th

e in

itia

l ev

ent c

lass

ifica

tion

for

an

Ale

rt o

r h

ighe

r.

b.M

obili

ze s

ite e

mer

gen

cy

resp

ond

ers

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s w

ithin

15

min

utes

of t

he in

itial

ev

ent c

lass

ifica

tion

for

an

Ale

rt o

r h

ighe

r.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

22 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

72

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

2. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

no

tify

resp

onsi

ble

Sta

te, l

oca

l go

vern

men

t age

nci

es b

egin

nin

g no

late

r th

an 1

5 m

inut

es a

nd th

e N

RC

no

late

r th

an 6

0 m

inut

es

afte

r d

ecla

ring

an e

mer

genc

y.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.T

rans

mit

info

rmat

ion

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

app

rove

d em

erg

ency

pl

an

proc

edur

es n

o la

ter

than

15

min

ute

s a

fter

even

t cla

ssifi

catio

n.

b.T

rans

mit

info

rmat

ion

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

app

rove

d em

erg

ency

pl

an

proc

edur

es, n

o la

ter

than

60

min

ute

s a

fter

last

tr

ans

mitt

al fo

r a

follo

w-u

p no

tific

atio

n to

Sta

te a

nd

loca

l aut

horit

ies.

c.T

rans

mit

info

rmat

ion

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s no

late

r th

an

60 m

inu

tes

afte

r ev

ent

clas

sific

atio

n fo

r an

initi

al

notif

icat

ion

of th

e N

RC

.

3. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

w

arn

or

advi

se o

nsite

indi

vid

uals

of

em

erg

ency

con

diti

ons.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

23 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

73

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.In

itiat

e no

tific

atio

n o

f on

site

indi

vid

uals

with

in

15 m

inu

tes

of n

otifi

catio

n.

C. E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

1. D

emon

stra

te th

e c

apa

bilit

y to

di

rect

and

con

tro

l em

erge

ncy

op

era

tions

.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.C

omm

and

and

con

trol

is

dem

ons

tra

ted

by

the

Con

trol

Roo

m in

the

ear

ly

pha

se o

f the

em

erg

ency

, an

d th

e te

chni

cal s

upp

ort

cent

er (

TS

C)

with

in 6

0 m

inut

es o

f dec

lara

tion

of

an A

lert

or

high

er

emer

genc

y cl

assi

ficat

ion.

2. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

tr

ans

fer

em

erg

ency

dire

ctio

n fr

om

the

cont

rol r

oom

(si

mu

lato

r)

to th

e T

SC

upo

n a

ctiv

atio

n.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

24 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

74

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.T

urn

over

brie

fings

are

co

nduc

ted

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith e

mer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

b.D

ocum

ent

atio

n of

tr

ans

fer

of d

utie

s is

co

mpl

eted

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith e

mer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

4. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

pe

rfor

m a

ssem

bly

and

ac

cou

nta

bilit

y fo

r a

ll on

site

in

div

idu

als

with

in 3

0 m

inut

es o

f an

em

erg

ency

re

quiri

ng

prot

ecte

d ar

ea a

sse

mbl

y an

d ac

cou

nta

bilit

y.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.P

rote

cte

d ar

ea (

PA

) pe

rso

nnel

ass

em

bly

and

ac

cou

nta

bilit

y co

mpl

ete

d w

ithin

30

min

utes

of a

n em

erge

ncy

requ

iring

pr

otec

ted

area

ass

em

bly

and

acc

oun

tab

ility

.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

25 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

75

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

D. E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

Faci

litie

s

1. D

emon

stra

te a

ctiv

atio

n of

the

op

era

tiona

l su

ppo

rt c

ente

r (O

SC

), a

nd fu

ll fu

nctio

nal

op

era

tion

of th

e T

SC

and

EO

F

with

in 6

0 m

inut

es d

ecla

ratio

n of

A

lert

or

hig

her

em

erg

ency

cl

assi

ficat

ion.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.T

he

TS

C, E

OF

an

d O

SC

ar

e ac

tivat

ed w

ithin

abo

ut

60 m

inu

tes

of th

e in

itia

l no

tific

atio

n.

2. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

deq

uacy

of

equ

ipm

ent,

secu

rity

pro

visi

ons,

an

d h

abita

bili

ty p

reca

utio

ns fo

r th

e T

SC

, OS

C a

nd E

OF

as

app

ropr

iate

.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.E

mer

gen

cy e

qui

pme

nt in

th

e em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

fa

cilit

ies

as s

peci

fied

in

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s w

as a

vaila

ble

to e

mer

gen

cy

resp

ond

ers.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

26 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

76

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

b.T

he S

ecur

ity S

hift

S

upe

rvis

or im

ple

men

ts

and

follo

ws

app

licab

le

emer

genc

y p

roce

dure

s.

c.T

he

TS

C O

n-S

ite

Rad

iolo

gica

l Ass

essm

ent

Coo

rdin

ato

r im

plem

ents

de

sign

ated

re

spon

sibi

litie

s in

ac

cord

ance

with

em

erge

ncy

pla

n

proc

edu

res

if a

n on

site

/offs

ite r

ele

ase

has

oc

curr

ed.

3. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

deq

uacy

of

com

mun

ica

tions

for

all

emer

genc

y su

ppor

t re

sour

ces.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.E

mer

gen

cy r

espo

nse

faci

lity

pers

onne

l are

abl

e

to o

pera

te

com

mun

icat

ion

syst

ems

in a

ccor

dan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

b.C

lear

prim

ary

and

bac

kup

co

mm

unic

atio

ns li

nks

are

es

tabl

ishe

d a

nd

mai

ntai

ned

for

the

dura

tion

of th

e e

xerc

ise.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

27 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

77

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

E. R

adio

logi

cal A

sses

smen

t and

C

ontro

l

1. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

ob

tain

ons

ite r

adio

log

ical

su

rvey

s an

d sa

mpl

es.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.R

adia

tion

Pro

tect

ion

T

ech

nici

ans

dem

onst

rate

th

e ab

ility

to o

btai

n ap

pro

pria

te in

stru

me

nts

(ran

ge a

nd ty

pe)

and

pe

rfor

m s

urv

eys.

b.A

irbor

ne

sam

ples

are

ta

ken

in a

ccor

dan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

2. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

co

ntin

uous

ly m

oni

tor

and

co

ntro

l ra

diat

ion

exp

osur

e to

em

erg

ency

w

orke

rs.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

28 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

78

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

a.E

mer

gen

cy w

orke

rs a

re

issu

ed s

elf

rea

ding

do

sim

ete

rs w

hen

radi

atio

n le

vels

re

quire

, an

d e

xpos

ures

are

co

ntro

lled

to 1

0 C

FR

Pa

rt

20 li

mits

(un

less

the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ato

r au

tho

rizes

em

erge

ncy

lim

its).

b.E

xpos

ure

reco

rds

are

avai

labl

e.

c.E

mer

gen

cy w

orke

rs

incl

ude

Sec

urity

and

pe

rso

nnel

with

in a

ll em

erge

ncy

faci

litie

s.

3. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

as

sem

ble

and

de

ploy

fiel

d

mon

itorin

g te

ams

with

in 6

0 m

inut

es fr

om

the

deci

sion

to d

o so

.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.O

ne

Fie

ld M

onito

ring

team

is r

eady

to b

e

dep

loye

d w

ithin

15

- 30

m

inut

es o

f the

ir ar

rival

on

site

. In

ad

ditio

n, a

n of

fsite

mon

itorin

g te

am

mus

t be

able

to b

e di

spat

ched

with

in 5

5-70

m

inut

es o

f an

Ale

rt o

r hi

ghe

r em

erge

ncy

clas

sific

atio

n.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

29 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

79

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

4. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

co

llect

an

d di

ssem

ina

te fi

eld

te

am d

ata.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.F

ield

team

col

lect

s da

ta

for d

ose

rate

and

airb

orn

e ra

dioa

ctiv

ity le

vels

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

b.F

ield

team

com

mun

icat

es

data

to th

e T

SC

and

/or

EO

F in

acc

orda

nce

with

em

erge

ncy

pla

n

proc

edu

res.

5. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

de

velo

p do

se p

roje

ctio

ns.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.T

ime

ly a

nd a

ccur

ate

dose

pr

ojec

tions

are

per

form

ed

in a

ccor

dan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

6. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

m

ake

the

deci

sio

n w

heth

er

to

issu

e ra

dio

pro

tect

ive

dru

gs (

KI)

to

ons

ite e

mer

genc

y w

ork

ers

.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

30 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

80

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.K

I is

take

n (s

imul

ate

d)

if th

e es

timat

ed

dose

to th

e

thyr

oid

will

exc

eed

25

re

m c

om

mitt

ed d

ose

eq

uiv

ale

nt (

CD

E).

7. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

de

velo

p ap

prop

riate

pro

tect

ive

ac

tion

rec

omm

enda

tion

s (P

AR

s)

and

not

ify a

ppro

pria

te a

utho

ritie

s no

late

r th

an 1

5 m

inut

es a

fter

deve

lopm

ent

.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.T

ota

l effe

ctiv

e do

se

equ

ival

ent

(T

ED

E)

and

CD

E d

ose

pro

ject

ion

s fr

om

the

dose

as

sess

men

t com

pute

r co

de a

re c

om

par

ed in

ac

cord

ance

with

em

erge

ncy

pla

n

proc

edu

res.

b.‘P

AR

s ar

e de

velo

ped

no

late

r th

an 1

5 m

inut

es

afte

r d

ata

ava

ilabi

lity.

c.P

AR

's a

re tr

ansm

itted

via

vo

ice

or fa

x n

o la

ter

than

15

min

ute

s af

ter

even

t cl

assi

ficat

ion

and/

or P

AR

de

velo

pme

nt.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

31 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

81

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

F. P

ublic

Info

rmat

ion

1. D

emon

stra

te th

e c

apa

bilit

y to

de

velo

p an

d di

ssem

inat

e c

lear

, ac

cura

te, a

nd ti

mel

y in

form

atio

n

to th

e ne

ws

med

ia in

acc

orda

nce

w

ith E

PP

s.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.T

he

Join

t In

form

atio

n C

ente

r (J

IC)

is a

ctiv

ated

w

ithin

60

min

utes

fo

llow

ing

the

decl

arat

ion

of

a S

ite A

rea

Em

erge

ncy

or h

ighe

r cl

assi

ficat

ion

or

follo

win

g th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

ina

tor’s

or

JIC

D

irect

or’s

inst

ruct

ion

to

do s

o.

b.F

ollo

w-u

p in

form

atio

n is

pr

ovid

ed to

the

new

s m

edia

, du

ring

sche

dul

ed

new

s co

nfer

ence

s an

d m

edia

brie

fing

s.

2. D

emon

stra

te th

e c

apa

bilit

y to

es

tabl

ish

and

effe

ctiv

ely

ope

rate

ru

mor

con

trol

in a

coo

rdin

ated

fa

shio

n.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

32 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

82

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

a.C

alls

are

ans

wer

ed in

a

timel

y m

ann

er

with

the

corr

ect i

nfor

mat

ion,

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

emer

genc

y p

lan

pr

oce

dure

s.

b.C

alls

are

re

turn

ed o

r fo

rwar

ded,

as

app

ropr

iate

, to

de

mo

nstr

ate

re

spon

sive

ness

.

c.R

umor

s ar

e id

ent

ified

and

ad

dre

ssed

in a

ccor

dan

ce

with

em

erge

ncy

pla

n

proc

edu

res.

G. E

valu

atio

n

1. D

emon

stra

te th

e a

bilit

y to

co

nduc

t a p

ost-

exe

rcis

e cr

itiq

ue,

to d

eter

min

e ar

eas

re

quiri

ng

impr

ove

me

nt a

nd

corr

ectiv

e ac

tion

.

Per

form

ance

Crit

eria

:

a.A

n ex

erci

se ti

me

line

is

deve

lope

d, fo

llow

ed b

y an

eva

luat

ion

of th

e ob

ject

ives

.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

33 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

83

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

b.S

ign

ifica

nt p

robl

ems

in

achi

evin

g th

e ob

ject

ives

ar

e di

scu

sse

d to

en

sure

un

der

sta

ndin

g of

why

ob

ject

ives

wer

e no

t fu

lly

achi

eved

.

c.R

ecom

men

datio

ns fo

r im

prov

em

ent

in

non

-obj

ect

ive

are

as a

re

disc

usse

d.

814

.1.2

.1 A

rep

ort e

xist

s an

d co

ndlu

des

that

con

firm

s on

site

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pe

rson

nel

wer

e m

obili

zed

to fi

ll em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pos

itio

ns a

nd th

ere

wer

e no

unc

orre

cted

ons

ite

exer

cise

de

ficie

ncie

s.

814

.1.2

.2 A

rep

ort e

xist

s an

d co

nclu

des

that

con

firm

s on

site

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pe

rson

nel

perf

orm

ed th

eir

assi

gne

d

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

as p

rovi

ded

in

Sec

tion

B o

f the

Co

ma

nche

Pea

k U

nits

3 a

nd 4

Co

mb

ined

Lic

ense

A

pplic

atio

n E

me

rgen

cy P

lan

and

th

ere

we

re n

o u

ncor

rect

ed o

nsite

ex

erci

se d

efic

ienc

ies.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

34 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15C

TS

-011

74

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

84

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

14.1

.3 A

re

port

exi

sts

and

co

nclu

des

that

the

exer

cise

was

co

mpl

ete

d w

ithin

the

spec

ifie

d tim

e pe

riods

of A

ppen

dix

E to

10

CF

R P

art

50,

offs

ite e

xerc

ise

ob

ject

ives

wer

e m

et, a

nd th

ere

ar

e no

un

corr

ecte

d de

ficie

ncie

s or

a li

cen

see

cond

ition

req

uire

s of

fsite

de

ficie

ncie

s to

be

add

ress

ed p

rior

to o

pera

tion

abo

ve 5

% o

f rat

ed p

ower

.

15.0

Rad

iolo

gic

al E

me

rge

nc

y R

esp

on

se T

rain

ing

10 C

FR

50

.47(

b)(1

5) –

Ra

dio

logi

cal

emer

genc

y re

spon

se tr

aini

ng is

pr

ovid

ed to

tho

se w

ho m

ay b

e ca

lled

upo

n to

ass

ist i

n an

em

erge

ncy.

15.

1 S

ite-s

pec

ific

emer

gen

cy

resp

onse

trai

ning

has

be

en

prov

ided

for

thos

e w

ho m

ay b

e ca

lled

upo

n to

pro

vide

ass

ista

nce

in th

e e

vent

of a

n e

me

rgen

cy.

[O.1

]

15.

1 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

rain

ing

reco

rds

will

be

perf

orm

ed.

15.1

Site

-spe

cific

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

trai

nin

g ha

s b

een

prov

ide

d fo

r lo

cal f

ire

depa

rtm

ents

, law

enf

orce

men

t, am

bula

nce,

and

ho

spita

l pe

rson

nel

.

16.0

Res

po

ns

ibili

ty f

or

the

Pla

nn

ing

Eff

ort

: D

eve

lop

men

t ,

Per

iod

ic R

evie

w, a

nd

Dis

trib

uti

on

of

Em

erg

en

cy P

lan

s

10 C

FR

50.

47(b

)(1

6) –

R

espo

nsib

ilitie

s fo

r p

lan

deve

lopm

ent a

nd

revi

ew a

nd

for

dist

ribu

tion

of e

me

rgen

cy p

lans

are

es

tabl

ishe

d, a

nd p

lann

ers

are

pr

oper

ly tr

aine

d.

16.1

Th

e em

erge

ncy

res

pons

e pl

ans

have

bee

n fo

rwar

ded

to a

ll or

gan

izat

ion

s an

d ap

pro

pria

te

indi

vidu

als

with

re

spon

sibi

lity

for

impl

em

ent

atio

n of

the

pla

ns.

[P.5

]

16.

1 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

he

dis

trib

utio

n le

tter

will

be

per

form

ed.

16.1

The

Com

anch

e P

eak

Nuc

lear

Po

wer

Pla

nt U

nit 3

& 4

C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

n E

me

rgen

cy

Pla

n w

as fo

rwar

ded

to th

e T

exas

G

ove

rnor

’s D

ivis

ion

of

Em

erge

ncy

Man

age

men

t, th

e

Hoo

d C

oun

ty J

udge

and

the

Som

erve

ll C

oun

ty J

udg

e.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

35 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174

Rev

isio

n 1

85

Co

man

che

Pea

k N

ucl

ear

Po

wer

Pla

nt,

Un

its

3 &

4C

OL

Ap

plic

atio

nP

art

10 -

ITA

AC

an

d P

rop

ose

d L

icen

se C

on

dit

ion

s

17.0

Im

ple

me

nti

ng

Pro

ced

ure

s

10 C

FR

Par

t 50,

App

. E.V

– N

o le

ss

than

180

da

ys b

efor

e th

e sc

hedu

led

da

te fo

r in

itial

load

ing

of fu

el f

or a

co

mbi

ned

lice

nse

unde

r p

art 5

2 o

f th

is c

hap

ter,

the

app

lican

t’s o

r lic

ense

e’s

deta

iled

imp

lem

entin

g pr

oced

ures

for

its e

mer

gen

cy p

lan

shal

l be

subm

itte

d to

the

Com

mis

sion

.

17.1

The

lice

nse

e h

as s

ubm

itted

de

taile

d im

ple

men

ting

pr

oced

ures

for

its e

mer

gen

cy

plan

no

less

than

180

day

s p

rior

to fu

el lo

ad.

17.

1 A

n in

spec

tion

of t

he

sub

mitt

al le

tter

will

be

perf

orm

ed.

17.1

Lu

min

ant h

as s

ubm

itted

de

taile

d em

erg

ency

pla

n

proc

edur

es fo

r th

e on

site

em

erge

ncy

pla

n, t

o th

e N

RC

, no

le

ss th

an 1

80

day

s pr

ior

to fu

el

loa

d.

Tab

le B

-1 (

Sh

eet

36 o

f 36

)E

me

rge

ncy

Pla

n I

nsp

ect

ion

s, T

es

ts,

An

alys

es,

and

Ac

cep

tan

ce

Cri

teri

a

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

nd

ard

EP

Pro

gra

m E

lem

ents

**In

spec

tio

ns,

Tes

ts, A

nal

yses

Acc

ep

tan

ce C

rite

ria

** R

efer

ence

s in

bra

cket

s co

rres

pon

d to

NU

RE

G-0

654

/FE

MA

-RE

P-1

, Rev

. 1 E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia

CT

S-0

1174

RC

OL2

_13.

03-

15

CT

S-0

1174



Appendix C

Revision 186

PART 10 - APPENDIX C

PHYSICAL SECURITY HARDWARE

C.1 Design Description

1.b Access to vital equipment requires passage through at least two physical barriers.

2.a Physical barriers for the protected area perimeter are not part of vital area barriers.

2.b Penetrations through the protected area barrier are secured and monitored.

2.c Unattended openings of passable size that intersect a security boundary such as underground pathways must be protected by a physical barrier and monitored by intrusion detection equipment or provided with surveillance at a frequency sufficient to detect exploitation.

3.a Isolation zones exist in outdoor areas adjacent to the physical barrier at the perimeter of the protected area that allow sufficient size for observation and assessment on either side of the barrier.

3.b Isolation zones are monitored with intrusion detection and assessment equipment that can provide detection and assessment of activities within the isolation zone.

3.c Areas where permanent buildings do not allow sufficient observation distance between the intrusion detection system and the protected area barriers (e.g., the building walls are immediately adjacent to, or are an integral part of the protected area barrier) are monitored with intrusion detection and assessment equipment that is designed to detect and assess the attempted or actual penetration of the protected area perimeter barrier before completed penetration of the barrier.

4.a The perimeter intrusion detection system (IDS) can detect penetration or attempted penetration of the protected area perimeter barrier and subsequent alarms annunciate concurrently in at least two continuously manned onsite alarms stations.

4.b The perimeter assessment equipment can provide video image recording with real-time and playback capability that can provide assessment of detected activities before and after each alarm annunciation at the protected area perimeter barrier.

4.c Intrusion detection and assessment equipment at the protected area perimeter remains operational from an uninterruptible power supply in the event of the loss of normal power.

CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 187

5. Isolation zones and exterior areas within the protected area are provided with illumination to permit observation of activities within exterior areas of the protected area.

6.b The external walls, doors, ceilings and floors in the secondary alarm station and the last access control function for access to the protected area are bullet resistant, to at least Underwriters Laboratories Ballistic Standard 752, "The Standard of Safety for Bullet-Resisting Equipment," Level 4, or National Institute of Justice Standard 0108.01, "Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials," Type III.

7. The vehicle barrier system is designed, installed, and located at the necessary standoff distance to protect against the design-basis threat vehicle bombs.

8.a Access control points are established to control personnel and vehicle access into the protected area.

8.b Access control points are designed and established with equipment to detect firearms, explosives, incendiary devices, and other items which could be used to commit radiological sabotage at the protected area personnel access points.

9. An access control system with a numbered photo identification badge system is designed and installed for use by individuals who are authorized access to protected areas and vital areas without escort.

10.b Unoccupied vital areas are locked and alarmed with activated intrusion detection systems that annunciate in the secondary alarm station.

11.a.ii Security alarm annunciation and video assessment information are available in the secondary alarm station concurrently with the central alarm station.

11.b.ii The secondary alarm station is located inside a protected area and the interior of the secondary alarm station is not visible from the perimeter of the protected area.

11.c.i The alarm system will not allow the status of a detection point, locking mechanism or access control device to be changed from the central alarm station without the knowledge and concurrence of the secondary alarm station operator.

11.c.ii The alarm system will not allow the status of a detection point, locking mechanism or access control device to be changed from the secondary alarm station without the knowledge and concurrence of the central alarm station operator.

CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 188

11.d Central and secondary alarm stations are designed, equipped, and constructed such that no single act, in accordance with the design basis threat of radiological sabotage, can simultaneously remove the ability of both the central and secondary alarm stations to: (1) detect and assess alarms (2) initiate and coordinate an adequate response to alarms (3) summon offsite assistance, and (4) provide effective command and control.

11.e Both the central and secondary alarm stations are constructed, protected, and equipped to the standards for the central alarm station.

13.b.ii Intrusion detection and assessment systems provide visual display and audible annunciation in the secondary alarm station.

15.b Emergency exits through the protected area perimeter are alarmed with intrusion detection devices and secured by locking devices that allow prompt egress during an emergency.

16.a.ii The secondary alarm station has conventional (land line) telephone service with local law enforcement authorities and a system for communication with the main control room.

16.b.ii The secondary alarm station is capable of continuous communication with security personnel.

16.c.ii Nonportable communications equipment in the secondary alarm station will remain operational from an independent power source in the event of loss of normal power.

C.2 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria

Table C-1 specifies the inspections, tests, analyses, and associated acceptance criteriaITAAC for the site-specific physical security hardware.

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 189

Table C-1 (Sheet 1 of 7)Physical Security Hardware Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria


1.b Access to vital equipment requires passage through at least two physical barriers.

1.b Inspections will be performed of vital equipment locations.

1.b. Vital equipment is located such that access to the vital equipment requires passage through at least two physical barriers.

2.a Physical barriers for the protected area perimeter are not part of vital area barriers.

2.a Inspections of the protected area perimeter barriers will be performed.

2.a Physical barriers at the perimeter of the protected area are separated from any other barrier designated as a Vvital Aarea barrier.

2.b Penetrations through the protected area barrier aremust be secured and be capable of beingand monitored.

2.b Inspections will be performed of penetrations through the protected area barrier.

2.b Penetrations and openings of a passable size through the protected area barrier are secured and monitored by intrusion detection equipment.

2.c Unattended openings of passable size that intersect a security boundary such as underground pathways must be protected by a physical barrier and monitored by intrusion detection equipment or provided with surveillance at a frequency sufficient to detect exploitation.

2.c Inspections will be performed of unattended openings of passable size within the protected area barriers.

2.c Unattended openings of a passable size, (such as underground pathways) that intersect a security boundary (such as the protected area barrier), are protected by a physical barrier and monitored by intrusion detection equipment or provided with surveillance at a frequency sufficient to detect exploitation.

3.a Isolation zones exist in outdoor areas adjacent to the physical barrier at the perimeter of the protected area that allow sufficient size for observation and assessment on either side of the barrier.

3.a Inspections of the isolation zones outdoor areas adjacent to the protected area perimeterphysical barrier will be performed.

3.a The isolation zones exist in outdoor areas adjacent to the physical barrier at the perimeter of the protected area and allow 20 feet for observation and assessment of the activities of people on either side of the barrier.

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 190

3.b Where permanent buildings do not allow a sufficient distance for observation on the inside of the protected area, the building walls are immediately adjacent to, or an integral part of, the protected area barrier, and the (license applicant specified) observation distance does not apply.Isolation zones are monitored with intrusion detection and assessment equipment that can provide detection and assessment of activities within the isolation zone.

3.b Inspections of the part of the building that constitutes the protected area will be performed.The intrusion detection equipment for monitoring the isolation zones will be inspected.

3.b Where permanent buildings do not allow a 20 feet distance on the inside of the protected area, the building walls are immediately adjacent to, or an integral part of, the protected area barrier and the 20 feet observation distance does not apply.Isolation zones are monitored by intrusion detection and assessment equipment capable of providing detection and assessment of activities within the isolation zone.

3.c Areas where permanent buildings do not allow sufficient observation distance between the intrusion detection system and the protected area barriers (e.g., the building walls are immediately adjacent to, or are an integral part of the protected area barrier) are monitored with intrusion detection and assessment equipment that is designed to detect and assess the attempted or actual penetration of the protected area perimeter barrier before completed penetration of the barrier.

3.c Inspections of the areas of the protected area perimeter barrier that do not have isolation zones will be performed.

3.c Areas where permanent buildings do not allow a minimum of 20 feet observation distance between the intrusion detection system and the protected area barrier (e.g., the building walls are immediately adjacent to, or are an integral part of the protected area barrier) are monitored with intrusion detection and assessment equipment that detect and assess attempted or actual penetration of the protected area perimeter barrier before completed penetration of the barrier.

4.a The Intrusionperimeter instrusion detection system (IDS) can detect penetration or attempted penetration of the protected area perimeter barrier and subsequent alarms annunciate concurrently in at least two continuously manned onsite alarms stations, (central and secondary alarm stations).

4.a Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of the intrusion detection system will be performed.

4.a The intrusion detection systemIDS can detect penetration or attempted penetration of the protected area perimeter barrier before completed penetration of the barrier, and subsequent alarms annunciate concurrently in at least two continuously manned onsite alarms stations, (central and secondary alarm stations).



CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.12-5CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 191

4.b Video image recording equipment with real-time and play-back capability provides the ability to assess detected assessment activities before and after each alarm annunciation within the isolation zone.The perimeter assessment equipment can provide video image recording with real-time and playback capability that can provide assessment of detected activities before and after each alarm annunciation at the protected area perimeter barrier.

4.b Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of the video assessment equipment will be performed.

4.b Video image recording equipment with real-time and play-back capability provide the ability to display activities before and after each alarm annunciation within the isolation zone.The perimeter assessment equipment is capable of video image recording equipment with real-time and play-back video image recording that provides assessment of detected activities before and after each alarm annunciation at the protected area perimeter barrier.

4.c Intrusion detection and assessment equipment at the protected area perimeter remains operableoperational from an uninterruptible power supply in the event of the loss of normal power.

4.c Tests, inspections or a combination of tests and inspections of the uninterruptible power supply will be performed.

4.c Intrusion detection and assessment equipment at the protected area perimeter remains operableoperational from an uninterruptible power supply in the event of the loss of normal power.

5. Isolation zones and exterior areas within the protected area are provided with illumination to permit observation of activities within exterior areas of the protected area.abnormal presence or activity of persons or vehicles.

5. Inspections or tests of the Iillumination in isolation zones and exterior areas of the protected will be performed.

5. Illumination in isolation zones and exterior areas within the protected area is 0.2 foot- candles measured horizontally at ground level or, alternatively, sufficient to permit observation and assessment.

6.b The external walls, doors, ceilings and floors in the secondary alarm station and the last access control function for access to the protected area are bullet resistant, to at least Underwriters Laboratories Ballistic Standard 752, "The Standard of Safety for Bullet-Resisting Equipment," Level 4, or National Institute of Justice Standard 0108.01, "Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials," Type III.

6.b Type test, analysis or a combination of type test and analysis of the external walls, doors, ceiling and floors in the secondary alarm station and the last access control function for access to the protected area will be performed.

6.b A report exists and concludes that the external walls, doors, ceilings, floors in the secondary alarm station and the last access control function for access to the protected area are bullet resistant, to at least Underwriters Laboratories Ballistic Standard 752, "The Standard of Safety for Bullet-Resisting Equipment," Level 4, or National Institute of Justice Standard 0108.01, "Ballistic Resistant Protective Materials," Type III to , UL752 (2006) Level 4.



CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 192

7. The vehicle barrier system is installed and located at the necessary stand-off distance to protect against the DBT vehicle bombs.The vehicle barrier system is designed, installed, and located at the necessary standoff distance to protect against the design-basis threat vehicle bombs.

7. Inspections will be performed for the vehicle barrier system.Type test, inspections, and analysis will be performed for the vehicle barrier system.

7. The vehicle barrier system will protect against the DBT vehicle bombs based upon the stand-off distance for the system.A validated report reviewed in accordance with NUREG/CR-6190 exists and concludes that the vehicle barrier system will protect against the design-basis threat vehicle bombs based on the standoff distance for the system.

8.a Access control points are established to control personnel and vehicle access into the protected area.

8.a Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of installed systems and equipment will be performed.

8.a Access control points exist for the protected area and are configured to control access and are equipped with locking devices, intrusion detection equipment and surveillance equipment consistent with the intended function.

8.b Access control points are designed and established with equipment to detect firearms, explosives, and incendiary devices, and other items which could be used to commit radiological sabotage at the protected area personnel access points.

8.b Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of installed systems and equipment will be performed.

8.b The detection equipment at the protected area personnel access points is capable of detecting firearms, explosives, and incendiary devices.Detection equipment exists and is capable of detecting firearms, explosives, incendiary devices or other items which could be used to commit radiological sabotage at the protected area personnel access control points.

9. An security access control system with a numbered picturephoto identification badges system is designed and installed for use by individuals who are authorized access to protected areas and vital areas without escort.

9. Tests of the access control system with numbered picturephoto identification badges system will be performed.

9. The access authorization system utilizes numbered picture badges, and authorizes protected area access onlyThe access authorization system with a numbered photo identification badge system is installed and provides authorized access to protected and vital areas to those personnel with unescorted access authorization.



CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 193

10.b Unoccupied vital areas are locked and alarmed with activated intrusion detection systems that annunciate in the secondary alarm station.

10.b Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of unoccupied vital areas intrusion detection equipment and locking devices will be performed.

10.b Unoccupied vital areas are locked and intrusion is detected and annunciated in the secondary alarm station.

11.a-2.ii Security alarm annunciation and video assessment information are available in the secondary alarm station concurrently in the secondary alarm stationwith the central alarm station.

11.a-2.ii Tests, inspections or a combination of tests and inspections of alarm annunciation and video assessment equipment will be performed.

11.a-2.ii Security alarm annunciation and video assessment equipment information is available concurrently in the secondary alarm station concurrently with the central alarm station.

11.b-2.ii The secondary alarm station is located inside a protected area and the interior of the secondary alarm station is not visible from the perimeter of the protected area

11.b-2.ii Inspections of the secondary alarm station locations will be performed.

11.b-2.ii The secondary alarm station is located inside a protected area and the interior of the secondary alarm station is not visible from the perimeter of the protected area.

11.c.i The alarm system will not allow the status of a detection point, locking mechanism or access control device to be changed from the central alarm station without the knowledge and concurrence of the secondary alarm station operator.

11.c.i Tests, inspections, or a combination of intrusion detection equipment and access control equipment will be performed.

11.c.i The alarm system will not allow the status of a detection point, locking mechanism or access control device to be changed from the central alarm station without the knowledge and concurrence secondary alarm station operator.

11.c.ii The alarm system will not allow the status of a detection point, locking mechanism or access control device to be changed from the secondary alarm station without the knowledge and concurrence of the central alarm station operator.

11.c.ii Tests, inspection, or a combination of tests and inspections of intrusion detection equipment and access control equipment will be performed.

11.c.ii The alarm system will not allow the status of a detection point, locking mechanism or access control device to be changed from the secondary alarm station without the knowledge and concurrence of the alarm station operator in the central alarm station operator.



CTS-01174

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.12-5CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 194

11.cd Central and secondary alarm stations are designed, and equipped, and constructed such that, in the event of a no single act, in accordance with the design basis threat of radiological sabotage, can simultaneously remove the ability of both the central and secondary alarm stations tothe design enables the survivability of equipment needed to maintain the functional capability of either alarm station to: (1) detect and assess alarms (2) initiate and coordinate an adequate response to alarms (3) summon offsite assistance, and (4) provide effective command and control.

11.cd Tests, inspections or a combination of tests and inspections of the central and secondary alarm stations will be performed.

11.cd Central and secondary alarm stations are designed, equipped and constructed such that , in the event of a no single act, in accordance with the design basis threat of radiological sabotage, the design enables the survivability of equipment needed to maintain the functional capability of either alarm station tocan simultaneously remove the ability of the central and secondary alarm stations to: (1) detect and assess alarms (2) initiate and coordinate an adequate response to alarms (3) summon offsite assistance, and (4) provide effective command and control.

11.de Both the central and secondary alarm stations are constructed, protected, and equipped to the standards for the central alarm station (stations need not be identical in design).

11.de Tests, inspections or a combination of tests and inspections of the central and secondary alarm stations will be performed.

11.de The central alarm station and secondary alarm station are constructed, protected, and equipped to the same standards for functional redundancy (stations need not be identical in design).

13.b-2.ii Intrusion detection and assessment systems are designed to provide visual display and audible annunciation in the secondary alarm station.

13.b-2.ii Tests will be performed on Iintrusion detection and assessment systems.

13.b-2.ii The intrusion detection system provides a visual display and audible annunciation of alarms in the secondary alarm station.


15.b Tests, inspections or a combination of tests and inspections of emergency exits through the protected area perimeter will be performed.


16.a-2.ii The secondary alarm station has conventional (land line) telephone service with local law enforcement authorities and a system for communication with the main control room.

16.a-2.ii Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of the secondary alarm station communications capability with local law enforcement authorities and main control room will be performed

16.a-2.ii The secondary alarm station is equipped with conventional (land line) telephone service with local law enforcement authorities and has a system for continuous communication with the main control room.



CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.12-5

CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.12-5

CTS-01174

CTS-01174

CTS-01174



Appendix C

Revision 195

16.b-2.ii The secondary alarm station is capable of continuous communication with security personnel.

16.b-2.ii Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of the secondary alarm station continuous communication capabilities will be performed.

16.b-2.ii The secondary alarm station is capable of continuous communication with on-duty watchmen, armed security officers, watchmen or armed response individualsresponders, or other security personnel that have responsibilities within the physical protection program and during a contingency response events.

16.c.ii Nonportable communications equipment in the secondary alarm station will remain operational from an independent power source in the event of loss of normal power.

16.c.ii Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of the nonportable communications equipment will be performed.

16.c.ii Nonportable communication devices (including conventional telephone systems) in the secondary alarm station are wired to an independent power supply that enables those systems to remain operable, without disruption, during the loss of normal power.



CTS-01174

RCOL2_14.03.12-5CTS-01174

part 10 itaac and proposed license conditions revision1 update tracking report revision 2 · 2012....

Documents