Participatory Budgeting: principles, history, and cases (Porto Alegre, Chicago)

Dr. Michael Menser, Philosophy;

Brooklyn College/CUNY;

Morphospace@gmail.com

US/NYC Solidarity Economy Network

Provost’s Task Force on City-based Sustainability Education/BC

BC Sustainability Council

Board Member, Institute for Sustainable Cities/CUNY

Participatory Democracy (PD) Participatory democracy (PD) is that view of

politics which calls for the creation and proliferation of practices and institutions that enable individuals and groups to better determine the conditions in which they act and relate to others.

Individual are agents (not just persons with interests looking to be represented)

Not limited to formal politics, but includes the economic and social/cultural dimensions.

Examples of PD Historical Examples: Medieval Cities, Iroquois

Confederacy (League of 6 nations), New England Town Hall Meetings, SNCC, SDS, Global Justice Movement

Referenda (direct democracy) Criminal Trial Juries (chosen by lottery, consensus) Worker and consumer cooperatives’s Land trusts, credit unions Collective households, intentional communities Indymedia, Linux, Creative Commons

Participatory Budgeting Basics Participatory budgeting (PB): process in which

community members decide how to spend part of a public budget.

Types of budgets: municipal, capital, programs, also budgets of schools, housing projects and non-profit organizations

“Right to City” approach: need based, social inclusion

There are over 1,200 participatory budgets around the world (Worldwatch Institute).

.

PB is a Multi-stage Process: diagnosis, discussion, decision-making, implementation, and monitoring.

Residents assemble in neighborhood meetings to identify and prioritize local needs, and elect delegates for each community to the city-wide PB council.

Delegates discuss the local priorities and develop concrete projects that address them, together with technical experts (engineers, etc).

Delegates vote on which ones to fund. The government implements the chosen projects,

and residents and delegates monitor implementation (park, school, garden, bus line, cleanup of site).

Participatory Budgeting and Municipal Governance

Lobbyists

Political Parties

City Council

Neighborhood AssemblyDistrict 1

e.g. schools

Neighborhood AssemblyDistrict 2

e.g. gardens

Neighborhood AssemblyDistrict 3

e.g. green jobs

Participatory Budgeting Councildelegates are chosen by districts

priorities are ranked by each district

MAYOR'S OFFICEdepartments

experts

PB1

Michael Menser:

From Menegat 2002

Michael Menser:

From Menegat 2002

Quantifiable Benefits of PB more equitable public spending, decreases

inequality higher quality of life, increased satisfaction of

basic needs greater government transparency and

accountability, decreases corruption increased levels of public participation

(especially by marginalized residents) democratic and citizenship learning

Development of citizen capacities for self-governance

Educates citizens in how the budget process works

Public speaking skills Distributes leadership, proliferates

leaders Participants determine decision making

process and rules

Inspired the unorganized to organize.

Citizens have decisive, not just consultative power

Number of delegates tied to number that shows up at neighborhood assemblies

Privileges underserved and disempowered

Cultivated capacities for autonomy and self-development utilized in non PB activities.

Housing cooperatives Solidarity economy Women’s movements Environmental movements

PB, PD and Sustainability Thematic assemblies Environmental Atlas

of Porto Alegre Compiles ecological

knowledge that is useful for residents, businesses, Ngo’s at local and citywide levels (e.g. species locations, waterflow)

Written for high schoolers

Michael Menser:

Menegat 2002

Michael Menser:

Menegat 2002

Keys to PB’s Launch and Success in POA

Mayor’s office made it happen Worker’s Party (PT) supported it, had

link to community groups Fiscal crisis opened up opportunity Political parties stay out Participants view it as worth

participating: decisive power, clear benefits

Since when and now where?

PB began at the end of the 80’s, in Brazil, when democracy was reinstalled in the country.

Phases:I: Experimentation. 1989 - 1996 II: Expansion in Brazil. 1997 - 2000III: Diversification in Latin America. 2001-2005

IV: International Awareness. 2003 – 2005 Most experiences are still in Brazil, but many other Latin

American cities have adopted PB in the last 5 years. Currently, cities from Europe, Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe

are exercising PB.

INITIAL PHASESExperimentation

1989

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Santo André, Brazil

1990

Montevideo, Uruguay

1993

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Expansion in Brazil

1997Recife, BrazilAlvorada, BrazilCaxias do Sud, Bra.Belem, BrazilIcapui, BrazilMundo Novo, Brazil

1998Juiz de Fora,Brazil

2001Camphinas, Brazil

Diversification in Latin America

2000V. El Salvador, PeruIlo, Peru

2001D.Cuahutemoc, Mex.Cuenca, Ecuador

2002Cotacachi, EcuadorRosario, Argentina, Puerto Asis, ColombiaBuenos Aires, Arg.

PB in US: Chicago Alderman Joe Moore, Chicago, 49th

Ward Turning over his discretionary funds

(“menu money”), 1 million for fiscal year 2009/10--to a PB process (in NYC each City Council member received $350,000 plus)

Chi-town PB

Last spring, Alderman Moore brought together leaders of over 50 civic, religious and community organizations, asked each to appoint one or two representatives from their organizations to serve on a steering committee to design a participatory budgeting process for the 49th Ward. (committee was chaired by Jamiko Rose , Executive Director of the Organization of the Northeast)

Steering Committee developed three-step process and timetable that will culminate in a ward-wide meeting next spring when the entire community will deliberate and vote on the 49th Ward infrastructure spending priorities for 2010.

Step 1--Neighborhood Assembly Meetings (Nov and Dec 2009)

The ward will be organized into eight sections or areas, with a "neighborhood assembly" held in each area. (Also, a Spanish language assembly).

Neighborhood assemblies will be open to any 49th Ward resident.

Residents will receive info and brainstorm. At the conclusion, "community representatives" will

be elected; they will be charged with developing proposals for infrastructure menu allocation.

Step 2--Community Representative Meetings (December-February 2010)

The community representatives will meet to develop proposals for use of the infrastructure menu money to be presented at a ward-wide assembly in the spring. The representatives, at their discretion, may call additional neighborhood assembly meetings to solicit additional suggestions and bounce off ideas.

Step 3,Ward-Wide Assembly Meeting

Final step of the process, community residents will gather at a ward-wide assembly to deliberate and vote on the 2010 infrastructure spending priorities for the 49th Ward.

Resources www.participatorybudgeting.org (some slides and quotes were taken

from materials available there)