path.web.ua.ptpath.web.ua.pt/publications/j.jct.2017.07.028_si.docx · web viewsupporting...
TRANSCRIPT
Supporting Information
Primary and secondary aqueous two-phase systems composed of
thermo switchable polymers and bio-derived ionic liquids
Cher Pin Song, a Ramakrishnan Nagasundara Ramanan, a,b R. Vijayaraghavan, c Douglas R
MacFarlane, c Eng-Seng Chan, a João A. P. Coutinho, d Luis Fernandez d,e and Chien-Wei
Ooi*a,b
a Chemical Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan
Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor Malaysia.
b Tropical Medicine and Biology Platform, School of Science, Monash University Malaysia,
Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor Malaysia.
c School of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
d CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro,
3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
e Laboratorio de Termodinamica y Fisicoquímica de Fluidos, 35071-Parque Científico-
Tecnologico, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
Synthesis procedure and characterization data for [Ch][AA]
Four different types of cholinium aminoate ([Ch][AA]), namely cholinium lysinate ([Ch][Lys],
molecular mass = 249.4 g mol-1), cholinium β-alaninate ([Ch][β-Ala], molecular mass = 192.3
g mol-1), cholinium glycinate ([Ch][Gly], molecular mass = 178.3 g mol-1) and cholinium
serinate ([Ch][Ser], molecular mass = 208.1 g mol-1), were synthesized as per the procedure
described in the literature.1 Typically, [Ch][AA]s were made by mixing aqueous “20 wt%”
choline hydroxide ([Ch][OH]) [note: batch analysis from manufacturer (Sigma Aldrich)
specifies an actual concentration at 20.9 wt% for this batch. The actual concentration of [Ch]
[OH] was confirmed by an aqueous titration with standard 0.1 M HCl solution] with the
corresponding aqueous AA solutions at 1:1 by mole. This was followed by distilling off the
water at 343.15 K under reduced pressure. The final product was dried at 333.15 K for two
days at vacuum. The stoichiometry in the obtained product was confirmed by comparison of
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the pH of a 0.1 M of final product with an aqueous titration curve of the starting materials (i.e.,
0.1 M of [Ch][OH] and 0.1 M of AA solution). Note that the “end-point” in the titration curves
of the AA solution is indistinct and is not directly useful as an indicator of an equimolar
stoichiometry. The [Ch][AA]s were characterized by Electrospray Mass Spectrometry, and
NMR (1H NMR and 13C NMR) Spectroscopy. The water content was analyzed by Karl-Fischer
titration method.
2
29
30
31
32
33
34
Cholinium lysinate ([Ch][Lys])
Aqueous solution of L-lysine (5.9 g, 40.1 mmol) was slowly added to 20 wt% aqueous [Ch]
[OH] (23.3 g, 40.1 mmol) and the [Ch][Lys] was made as per the procedure given above.
Electrospray Mass Spectrometry (cone 30 V):
[Ch][Lys], m/z (relative intensity, %): ES+, 104.1 (Me3N+CH2CH2OH, 100); ES-, 145.0
(lysinate, 100)
1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 1.26–1.41 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.43–1.54 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.55–
1.67 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.6–2.64 (t, 2H, CH2), 3.2 (s, 10H, CH3–N, CH–N), 3.48–3.51 (t, 2H, CH2),
4.01–4.06 (m, 2H, CH2)
13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 22.4, 31.2, 40.2, 53.8, 67.3,183.4
Water content (average triplicate in wt%) = 4.8
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][Lys] = 12.1
3
(a)
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
0 5 10 15 20 2510
11
12
13
14
Volume of 0.1 M L-lysine used (ml)
pH
Fig. S1 (a) 1H NMR spectra for [Ch][Lys] in D2O; (b) 13C NMR spectra for [Ch][Lys] in D2O;
(c) titration curve for titration of 10 mL of 0.1 M [Ch][OH] with 0.1 M L-lysine in water. The
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][Lys] = 12.1
4
(b)
(c)
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
Cholinium serinate ([Ch][Ser])
Aqueous solution of L-serine (5.0 g, 48 mmol) was slowly added to 20 wt% aqueous [Ch][OH]
(27.8 g, 48 mmol) and the [Ch][Ser] was made as per the procedure given above.
Electrospray Mass Spectrometry (cone 30 V):
[Ch] [Ser], m/z (relative intensity, %): ES+, 104.1 (Me3N+CH2CH2OH, 100); ES-, 104.0
(serinate, 100)
1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 3.18 (s, 9H, CH3–N), 3.36–3.38 (t, 1H, CH–N), 3.48–
3.51 (t, 2H, CH2), 4.01–4.07 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.6–3.78 (m, 2H, CH2)
13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 53.7, 55.5, 57.3, 64.2, 179.5
Water content (average triplicate in wt%) = 2.8
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][Ser] = 10.5
5
(a)
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
0 5 10 15 20 259
10
11
12
13
14
Volume of 0.1 M L-serine used (ml)
pH
Fig. S2 (a) 1H NMR spectra for [Ch][Ser] in D2O; (b) 13C NMR spectra for [Ch][Ser] in D2O;
(c) titration curve for titration of 10 mL of 0.1 M [Ch][OH] with 0.1 M L-serine in water. The
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][Ser] = 10.5
6
(b)
(c)
69
70
71
72
73
74
Cholinium glycinate ([Ch][Gly])
Aqueous solution of glycine (4.2 g, 56.1 mmol) was slowly added to 20 wt% aqueous [Ch]
[OH] (32.5 g, 56.1 mmol) and the [Ch][Gly] was made as per the procedure given above.
Electrospray Mass Spectrometry (cone 30 V):
[Ch] [Gly], m/z (relative intensity, %): ES+, 103.6 (Me3N+CH2CH2OH, 100); ES-, 74.2
(glycinate, 100)
1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 3.18 (s, 9H, CH3–N), 3.21 (s, 2H, CH2–N), 3.48–3.52 (m,
2H, CH2), 4.01–4.06 (m, 2H, CH2)
13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 44.1, 53.8, 65.2, 179.7
Water content (average triplicate in wt%) = 5.1
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][Gly] = 11.2
7
(a)
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
0 5 10 15 20 2510
11
12
13
14
Volume of 0.1 M glycine used (ml)
pH
Fig. S3 (a) 1H NMR spectra for [Ch][Gly] in D2O; (b) 13C NMR spectra for [Ch][Gly] in D2O;
(c) titration curve for titration of 10 mL of 0.1 M [Ch][OH] with 0.1 M glycine in water. The
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][Gly] = 11.2
8
(c)
(b)
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
Cholinium β-alaninate ([Ch][β-Ala])
Aqueous solution of β-alanine (4.6 g, 52 mmol) was slowly added to 20 wt% aqueous [Ch]
[OH] (30.2 g, 52 mmol) and the [Ch] [β-Ala] was made as per the procedure given above.
Electrospray Mass Spectrometry (cone 30 V):
[Ch] [β-Ala], m/z (relative intensity, %): ES+, 104.1 (Me3N+CH2CH2OH, 100); ES-, 87.9 (β-
alaninate, 100)
1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 2.2–2.3 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.7–2.8 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.18 (s, 9H,
CH3–N), 3.48–3.51 (m, 2H, CH2), 4.0–4.05 (m, 2H, CH2)
13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O, TMS): δ = 39.7, 53.8, 55.4, 65.2, 180.7
Water content (average triplicate in wt%) = 4.6
pH of 0.1 M [Ch][β-Ala] = 11.8
9
(a)
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Fig. S4 (a) 1H NMR spectra for [Ch][β-Ala] in D2O; (b) 13C NMR spectra for [Ch][β-Ala] in
D2O; (c) titration curve for titration of 10 mL of 0.1 M [Ch][OH] with 0.1 M β-alaninate in
water. The pH of 0.1 M [Ch][β-Ala] = 11.8
10
0 5 10 15 20 2510
11
12
13
14
Volume of 0.1 M β-alaninate used (ml)
pH(b)
(c)
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
200 250 300 350 4000.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Wavelength (nm)
Abso
rban
ce (A
bs)
Fig. S5 Wavelength scanning for PPG 400 and [Ch][AA]. 50 wt% PPG 400;
20 wt% [Ch][Lys]; 20 wt% [Ch][Ser]; 20 wt% [Ch][Gly]; 20 wt%
[Ch][β-Ala]
11
277 nm
116
117
118
119
120
0 5 10 15 20 250.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
f(x) = 0.0910709021839216 xR² = 0.999380305002494
Concentration of [Ch][Lys] (wt%)
Absor
bance
(Abs
)
0 5 10 15 20 250.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
f(x) = 0.13335360917451 xR² = 0.997592776624803
Concentration of [Ch][Ser] (wt%)
Absor
bance
(Abs)
0 5 10 15 20 250.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
f(x) = 0.115777698690196 xR² = 0.998339163048423
Concentration of [Ch][Gly] (wt%)
Absor
bance
(Abs
)
0 5 10 15 20 250.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
f(x) = 0.121052369541176 xR² = 0.996528668090932
Concentration of [Ch][β-Ala] (wt%)
Absor
bance
(Abs)
Fig. S6 Standard curves of [Ch][AA] solutions. The absorbance was measured at 277 nm
12
121
122
123
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
Fig. S7 Plait points for PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][Lys] (2) + water (3) systems. experimental
binodal data; ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ calculated binodal data from Eq. (6); experimental tie-line data;
auxiliary point; plait point; total composition (a) 288.15 K; (b) 298.15 K; (c) 308.15 K
13
(c)
(a) (b)
124
125
126
127
128
129
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 w2
100 w1
Fig. S8 Plait points for PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][Ser] (2) + water (3) systems. experimental
binodal data; ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ calculated binodal data from Eq. (6); experimental tie-line data;
auxiliary point; plait point; total composition (a) 288.15 K; (b) 298.15 K; (c) 308.15 K
14
(c)
(a) (b)
130
131
132
133
134
135
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
Fig. S9 Plait points for PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][Gly] (2) + water (3) systems. experimental
binodal data; ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ calculated binodal data from Eq. (6); experimental tie-line data;
auxiliary point; plait point; total composition (a) 288.15 K; (b) 298.15 K; (c) 308.15 K
15
(c)
(a) (b)
136
137
138
139
140
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
100 w2
100 w1
Fig. S10 Plait points for PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][β-Ala] (2) + water (3) systems. experimental
binodal data; ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ calculated binodal data from Eq. (6); experimental tie-line data;
auxiliary point; plait point; total composition (a) 288.15 K; (b) 298.15 K; (c) 308.15 K
16
(c)
(a) (b)
141
142
143
144
145
146
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.20
1
2
3
4
5(a)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00
1
2
3
4
5(b)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.50
1
2
3
4
(c)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.50
1
2
3
4
5
(d)
Fig. S11 Setschenow-type plots for tie-line data of PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][AA] (2) + water (3)
systems at different temperatures. (a) [Ch][Lys]; (b) [Ch][Ser]; (c) [Ch][Gly]; (d) [Ch][β-Ala];
288.15 K; 298.15 K; 308.15 K
17
ln (m¿¿1t ¿¿m1b¿)¿¿¿
(m¿¿2b−m2t )¿/mol kg-1
ln (m¿¿1t ¿¿m1b¿)¿¿¿
ln (m¿¿1t ¿¿m1b¿)¿¿¿ln (m¿¿1t ¿¿m1
b¿)¿¿¿
(m¿¿2b−m2t )¿/mol kg-1
(m¿¿2b−m2t )¿/mol kg-1
(m¿¿2b−m2t )¿/mol kg-1
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
0 10 20 30 40 500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
(a)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
(b)
0 10 20 30 40 500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 w2
100 w1
(c)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
100 w2
100 w1
(d)
Fig. S12 Tie-line data of PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][AA] (2) + water (3) systems at 288.15 K (black),
298.15 K (red) and 308.15 K (blue). (a) [Ch][Lys]; (b) [Ch][Ser]; (c) [Ch][Gly]; (d) [Ch][β-
Ala]; and ── represent the experimental tie-line data; and ----- represent the calculated
tie-line data using Setschenow-type equation
18
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
0 10 20 30 40 500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 w2
100 w1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
100 w2
100 w1
Fig. S13 Tie-line data of PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][AA] (2) + water (3) systems at 288.15 K (black),
298.15 K (red) and 308.15 K (blue). (a) [Ch][Lys]; (b) [Ch][Ser]; (c) [Ch][Gly]; (d) [Ch][β-
Ala]; and ── represent the experimental tie-line data; and ----- represent the calculated
tie-line data using e-NRTL model
19
(b)
(c)
(a)
(d)
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
Table S1 Absorbance values (Abs) for the mixture of PPG 400 and [Ch][AA] at 277 nm
Concentration of [Ch][AA] (wt%)
Concentration of PPG 400 (wt%) sda
0 8 10 15[Ch][Lys]
10 0.97 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.00615 1.42 1.42 1.40 n.d.b 0.01220 1.80 1.77 n.d.b n.d.b 0.021
[Ch][Ser]10 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.44 0.00515 2.06 2.05 2.06 n.d.b 0.00620 2.50 2.50 n.d.b n.d.b 0.000
[Ch][Gly]10 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 0.00815 1.82 1.82 1.83 n.d.b 0.00620 2.25 2.23 n.d.b n.d.b 0.014
[Ch][β-Ala]10 1.33 1.32 1.31 1.33 0.01015 1.93 1.91 1.92 n.d.b 0.01020 2.28 2.26 n.d.b n.d.b 0.014
a sd =¿¿, where |¿| represents the absorbance value, z is the concentration of PPG 400 [where z = (8, 10 and 15) wt%] and n is the number of absorbance values measured
b n.d. represents data not determined. The total composition of these systems was above the critical concentrations for the formation of two-phase solution.
20
170
171172
173174
175
176
Table S2 Experimental binodal data for PPG 400 (1) + [Ch][AA] (2) + water (3) systems at T = (288.15a, 298.15a,b and 308.15a) K and pressure p = 101.32 kPa
T = 288.15 K T = 298.15 Kb T = 308.15 K100 w1 100 w2 100 w1 100 w2 100 w1 100 w2
PPG 400 + [Ch][Lys] + water17.3 19.2 10.3 17.2 11.5 19.219.4 17.5 13.0 13.6 14.2 14.921.8 15.8 15.5 11.8 15.8 12.024.6 13.2 18.8 10.0 18.3 9.7829.4 11.8 20.4 9.32 19.8 9.0333.6 10.6 23.6 8.26 23.4 8.2041.8 7.43 24.7 7.68 24.7 7.6745.1 6.31 28.1 6.74 28.8 6.9047.0 5.98 29.4 6.42 30.4 6.6453.7 4.48 34.0 5.66 33.3 5.5554.8 4.22 35.2 5.42 34.6 5.3256.4 4.03 36.4 5.19 35.5 5.0858.4 3.89 39.3 4.71 37.7 4.5360.8 3.58 45.1 3.72 41.5 3.4262.0 3.44 49.7 2.76 47.0 2.61
PPG 400 + [Ch][Ser] + water15.4 17.1 10.6 17.7 10.6 17.717.2 15.5 13.3 13.9 12.8 13.519.5 14.2 15.9 12.1 14.9 11.322.8 12.3 19.1 10.2 17.0 9.0527.8 11.0 20.6 9.43 18.3 8.3531.4 9.87 23.7 8.31 20.8 7.2942.5 7.55 25.2 7.83 22.2 6.8946.3 6.48 28.2 6.76 25.3 6.0648.5 6.18 29.5 6.44 27.1 5.9058.8 4.90 34.2 5.69 31.7 5.2860.7 4.67 35.3 5.42 33.6 5.1763.4 4.52 36.3 5.18 35.0 5.0166.4 4.43 38.9 4.66 39.4 4.7371.4 4.20 46.1 3.79 47.9 3.9574.9 4.16 53.7 2.99 60.9 3.58
PPG 400 + [Ch][Gly] + water15.8 17.6 10.0 16.7 7.86 13.117.5 15.8 11.8 12.4 9.90 10.420.2 14.7 13.9 10.6 11.9 9.0323.6 12.7 17.6 9.40 14.7 7.8227.0 10.8 19.3 8.82 16.3 7.4730.5 9.58 22.8 7.97 19.6 6.8638.7 6.88 24.2 7.51 20.9 6.5142.0 5.87 26.9 6.46 23.8 5.7044.5 5.66 28.3 6.18 25.6 5.4857.4 4.78 32.5 5.41 29.5 4.9258.9 4.53 33.8 5.21 30.6 4.7060.3 4.31 35.0 5.00 31.6 4.5263.2 4.22 37.1 4.45 33.9 4.0765.6 3.86 42.5 3.50 40.1 3.30
21
177178
67.7 3.76 50.1 2.78 45.7 2.51
PPG 400 + [Ch][β-Ala] + water17.2 19.2 9.13 16.7 10.3 17.219.4 17.5 12.3 12.9 13.1 13.821.7 15.8 15.4 11.7 14.9 11.325.4 13.7 18.7 9.98 17.5 9.3529.1 11.7 20.7 9.44 18.5 8.4732.3 10.2 23.6 8.26 20.9 7.3240.9 7.27 24.6 7.65 22.6 7.0445.1 6.31 28.0 6.71 25.4 6.0947.0 5.98 29.0 6.33 26.9 5.8652.8 4.40 33.3 5.55 30.5 5.0854.3 4.18 35.1 5.40 31.6 4.8655.9 3.99 36.0 5.14 33.1 4.7258.3 3.89 38.9 4.67 35.3 4.2361.5 3.62 39.2 4.61 41.5 3.4263.0 3.50 49.9 2.77 46.4 2.73
a Standard uncertainty of temperature, u(T) = 1 K. Expanded uncertainty: for PPG 400 + [Ch][Lys] + water system, Uc are Uc(PPG 400) = Uc([Ch][Lys]) = 0.0018 (95% level of confidence); for PPG 400 + [Ch][Ser] + water system, Uc(PPG 400) = Uc([Ch][Ser]) = 0.0027 (95% level of confidence); for PPG 400 + [Ch][Gly] + water system, Uc(PPG 400) = Uc([Ch][Gly]) = 0.0022 (95% level of confidence); for PPG 400 + [Ch][β-Ala] + water system, Uc(PPG 400) = Uc([Ch][β-Ala]) = 0.0033 (95% level of confidence)
b Data taken from literature1
22
179180181182183184185
Table S3 Values of parameters of Eq. (3) for PPG 400 + [Ch][AA] + water systems at T = (288.15, 298.15 and 308.15) K
T (K) f g R2 sd a
PPG 400 + [Ch][Lys] + water288.15 65.61 0.607 0.982 0.785298.15 -2.905 2.612 0.971 0.825308.15 35.90 1.497 0.968 1.075
PPG 400 + [Ch][Ser] + water288.15 65.27 0.600 0.993 0.306298.15 -6.330 2.218 0.981 0.498308.15 41.40 1.563 0.966 1.344
PPG 400 + [Ch][Gly] + water288.15 51.52 0.960 0.991 0.374298.15 -16.88 2.602 0.973 1.109308.15 34.69 1.975 0.971 1.230
PPG 400 + [Ch][β-Ala] + water288.15 40.25 0.796 0.989 0.489298.15 -29.95 3.354 0.978 0.875308.15 29.06 1.078 0.962 1.234
a sd =¿¿, where w1 represents the concentration of PPG 400 (wt%) and n is the number of tie-line data
23
186187
188
189
Reference
(1) Song, C. P.; Ramanan, R. N.; Vijayaraghavan, R.; MacFarlane, D. R.; Chan, E.-S., Ooi, C.-
W. Green, aqueous two-phase systems based on cholinium aminoate ionic liquids with
tunable hydrophobicity and charge density. ACS Sus. Chem. Eng., 2015, 3, 3291-3298.
24
190
191
192
193
194