patrick herrmann, kautilya madhav, catherine muturi, jack rosati, curtis rose, jonathan ruggaard,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan
Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott, and Kevin Chan
EXAMINING INTRA-VISIT IRIS STABILITY (VISIT 6)
![Page 2: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• How to Identify a Person
• Biometrics
• What is it?
• Types?
• Why Care?
• Iris Recognition
• What is it?
• How Recognition Works
• Stability
• Other research
• Research Question
INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW
![Page 3: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Identity can be verified in three ways:
• What someone knows: Secret Knowledge
• What someone has: Token
• What someone is: Biometrics
HOW TO IDENTIFY A PERSON
![Page 4: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
•Biometrics: “a measurable, physical characteristic or biological characteristic used to recognize the identity or verify these claimed identity of an enrollee” [1]
WHAT IS BIOMETRICS?
![Page 5: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
•Large scale
•Not easily stolen or imitated
•Difficult to manipulate
ADVANTAGES OF BIOMETRICS
![Page 6: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
BIOMETRICS
• Physiological
• Hand geometry
• Fingerprint
• Iris Recognition
• Behavioral
• Signature
• Keystroke
• Voice
![Page 7: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
•This study will examine stability of match scores from samples taken within a time frame of 10 minutes or less.
RESEARCH QUESTION
![Page 8: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
•Controls the amount of light reaching the retina
•Captured using near infrared light
IRIS FUNCTION
![Page 9: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
•Depending on time window of sample collection (10 min)
• IREX VI found stability [5]
•Notre Dame study found evidence of aging [6]
TIME CHANGE
![Page 10: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• “Iris remains stable over time” [2]
• “Does not remain stable over time” [3]
• “Performance scores affected by time separation” [4]
IRIS AGING / STABILITY RESEARCH
![Page 11: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EFFECT ON THE EYE
Short Term
• Dilation
• Lighting
• Environment
• Glare
Long Term
• Muscular Degeneration
• Damage to iris
• Cataracts
• Disease
![Page 12: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
•Consistency between samples of the individuals
DEFINE STABILITY OF THE IRIS
[7]
![Page 13: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
•Established in 2013 by O’Connor [7]
• Initial work in fingerprints, but research continues in iris and face
•Another way of examining the performance of a user
STABILITY SCORE INDEX
![Page 14: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
![Page 15: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Data used was from a 2012 ICBR data collection captured at Purdue University
• Examined data runs in depth, created groupings and created data sets of each grouping
• Used Megamatcher to analyze the data runs
• Stability score index created for each subject
OVERVIEW
![Page 16: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Data collection began on 11 June 2010 and lasted for 1 year and 2 days (2010-06-11Z/P1Y0M0W2D).
• The time scope of interest for this report is in the day range.
• The collection period of interest for this analysis began on 11 April 2013 and lasted for four weeks and 1 day (2013-04-11Z/P0Y0M4W1D).
COLLECTION PERIOD
![Page 17: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Identify any error for each subject and iris from data runs
• Subjects with incorrect number of images, further investigated
• If the number of subjects images were less than required amount of images then they were eliminated
• The first data run was completely eliminated due to lack of images
EXAMINED DATA RUNS IN DEPTH
![Page 18: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Subjects were narrowed down to only those that met testing requirements
• These subjects were then pooled into new datasets
• This included locator number, subject ID, and modality subtype
EXPORTING REQUIRED SUBJECTS
![Page 19: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• Newly created data sets were then arranged into grouping based on the subject and left or right iris
• Each subject has 4 groupings of 6 images per group, the images were organized in order of three consecutive lefts and then three consecutive rights
CREATED GROUPING FOR EACH IRIS AND EACH VISIT
![Page 20: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• Each grouping was put into its own data set
• Group 1 of all subjects were combined into one data set
• Done for all four groupings
SPLIT GROUPS INTO SEPARATE DATA RUNS
![Page 21: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• The data runs were then processed by Megamatcher and exhaustively matched against all other images
• Megamatcher then outputs a genuine and impostor score for each subject
MEGAMATCHER USED TO ANALYZE DATA
![Page 22: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Stability score index (SSI) is made possible by taking the Euclidian distance of an individual subject which determines the change in location within the menagerie across two data runs
• The SSI ranges from 0-1, zero being the most stable score, it allows for stability of subjects to be determined and quantified
CREATION OF STABILITY SCORE INDEX
![Page 23: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
RESULTS
![Page 24: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
VISIT 6 AGE GROUPS
![Page 25: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
VISIT 6 GENDER
![Page 26: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
VISIT 6 – SELF DISCLOSED ETHNICITY
![Page 27: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
•Grouping 1-V6 (1-2, 1-3, 1-4)
•Grouping 2-V6 (2-1, 2-3, 2-4)
•Grouping 3-V6 (3-1, 3-2, 3-4)
•Grouping 4-V6 (4-1, 4-2, 4-3)
DATA ANALYSIS
![Page 28: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
GROUPING 1 – V6 ANALYSIS
There was not a statistically significant difference between the median stability scores between different groupings (H(2) = 0.05, p = 0.976), with a mean rank of 91.7 for 1-2, 89.9 for 1-3, and 89.9 for 1-4.
![Page 29: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
GROUPING 2 – V6 ANALYSIS
There was a statistically significant difference between the median stability scores between different groupings (H(2) = 6.24, p = 0.044), with a mean rank of 104.2 for 2-1, 84.3 for 2-3, and 83.0 for 2-4.
![Page 30: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
GROUPING 3 – V6 ANALYSIS
There was not a statistically significant difference between the median stability scores between different groupings (H(2) = 3.83, p = 0.148), with a mean rank of 101.0 for 3-1, 83.3 for 3-2, and 87.2 for 3-4.
![Page 31: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
GROUPING 4 – V6 ANALYSIS
There was not a statistically significant difference between the median stability scores between different groupings (H(2) = 5.77, p = 0.056), with a mean rank of 103.3 for 4-1, 81.3 for 4-2, and 87.0 for 4-1.
![Page 32: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
VISIT 1 N H DF P
Group 1 60 0.05 2 0.976
Group 2 60 6.24 2 0.044
Group 3 60 3.83 2 0.148
Group 4 60 5.77 2 0.056
RESULTS
![Page 33: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
![Page 34: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
•H0: The median stability scores are equal
•Ha: The median stability scores are not equal
•α = 0.05
HYPOTHESIS
![Page 35: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
•There was not a statistically significant difference between the median of the groupings, as indicated in the summary table. For this data, we can conclude that the iris is stable in this visit, even though the second grouping shows significant difference.
RESULTS SUMMARY
![Page 36: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
•More research to be conducted to validate the stability of the iris over a longer period of time (weeks, months, years)
•Re-examine datasets that rejected the null hypothesis
FUTURE WORK
![Page 37: Patrick Herrmann, Kautilya Madhav, Catherine Muturi, Jack Rosati, Curtis Rose, Jonathan Ruggaard, Ryan Rumble, Kyle Senteney, Ben Petry, Steve Elliott,](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1a5503460f94c2f764/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• [1] Association of Biometrics, 1999, p. 2
• [2] Daugman, J. (2004). How iris recognition works. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 14(1), 21–30. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818350
• [3] Baker, S. E., Bowyer, K. W., Flynn, P. J., & Phillips, P. J. (2013). Template Aging in Iris Biometrics : Evidence of Increased False Reject Rate in ICE 2006. In Handbook of Iris Recognition, 205–218, London: Springer.
• [4] Tome-Gonzalez, P., Alonso-Fernandez, F., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2008). On the Effects of Time Variability in Iris Recognition. Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, 2008. 2nd IEEE International Conference, 1–6.
• [5] Grother, P., Matey, J. R., Tabassi, E., Quinn, G. W., & Chumakov, M. (2013). IREX VI. Temporal Stability of Iris Recognition Accuracy. NIST Interagency Report, 7948, 1-3.
• [6] Baker, S. E., Bowyer, K. W., & Flynn, P. J. (2009). Empirical evidence for correct iris match score degradation with increased time-lapse between gallery and probe matches. In Advances in Biometrics (pp. 1170-1179). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• [7] O’Connor, K. J. (2013). Examination of stability in fingerprint recognition across force levels. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
REFERENCES