pg og sms 018 procedimento de integridade mecânica eng

OGX Petróleo e Gás Participações

S.A., Subsidiaries & Affiliates MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE PG.OG.SMS.018

Title: Mechanical Integrity Issued on: 04/May/12 Version 01

Prepared by:

Alter Azevedo SSO Engineer

Revised by:

Hegel Bernardes SSO Manager

Approved by:

Reinaldo Belotti Develop. and Production Director

of 17

SUMMARY

The purpose of this procedure is to set up the conditions that will allow the performance of

inspections, tests, repairs and maintenance, taking into consideration the equipment

deterioration mechanisms, trying to preserve their integrity and reliability.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 – Objective: 3

2 – Application and Scope: 3

3 – References: 3

4 – Definitions and Acronyms: 3

5 – Responsibilities: 4

6 – Assumptions: 4

7 – Records: 6

8 – Annexes: 6

The content of this procedure must be disclosed to all employees.

Requests for clarification should be sent to the Operational Health and Safety by e-mail

addressed to [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]




Prepared by:


Revised by:


Approved by:


of 17

REVISION/ISSUE CONTROL Issue Version Date Topics Type

(I / E / A / N) Summary of changes

2012 01 04/May/12 NA N Establishment of the procedure

REVISION RECORD CODE – TYPE OF CHANGE

Acronym Description

I Inclusion: New information was added. E Exclusion: Information excluded from prior version. A Change or adjustment to information existing in the previous version. N New: Shows procedure establishment date, corresponding to document 1st version.

Additional Information: (Field for comments or guidance for next revision or specific issues related to procedure subject matter).




Prepared by:


Revised by:


Approved by:


of 17

1 – Objective: The objective of this procedure is to establish, in a planned and systematic manner, the requirements to be applied by Operational Safety Management System (SGSO) to perform inspections, tests, repairs and maintenance, taking into account the mechanisms of equipment deterioration, seeking to preserve its integrity and reliability.

2 – Application and Scope: This procedure applies to onshore and offshore facilities connected to OGX and OGX contractors oil and natural gas drilling and production operations.

This procedure is to be implemented based on the Risk Analysis study, Critical Systems, and on equipment construction design standards. Good operating practices are those described in the manufacturers' manuals and in the operational procedures issued by OGX.

3 – References: Risk Assessment Study Preparation Procedure – PG.OG.SMS.002

Critical Equipment Management Procedure – PG.OG.SMS.007

4 – Definitions and Acronyms: 4.1 - ABNT: Brazilian Association of Technical Standards.

4.2 - Rated Area: Any area with a potential risk of explosion.

4.3 - Calibration: Set of operations establishing the relationship between the values indicated by a measuring instrument and the values established by the magnitude in the standards.

4.4 - Reliability: Refers to the situation where the equipment remains operational throughout the design service life without detectable failure, provided that submitted to compliance maintenance following the guidelines prescribed in the operating instructions and manufacturer's manuals and not having been overloaded beyond the design limits.

4.5 - END – Non-Destructive Testing (NDT): Tests performed with finished or semi-finished materials in order to detect the presence or absence of discontinuities or defects by applying the physical principles set forth in the procedures, without changing physical, chemical, mechanical or dimensional characteristics and without interfering with subsequent use thereof.

4.6 - EPS - Welding Procedure Specification.

4.7 - Hidden Failure: A latent system failure that is manifested when the function is required. For the sake of prevention, proactive actions should be in place (procedures).4.8 - Frequency: Number of times an event (impact, oscillation, contact) may occur over a given period of time.

Management Procedure PG.OG.SMS.018 Issued on: 04/May/12 Version

02

Mechanical Integrity Procedure of 17

4.9 - HP - Hold Point: Inspection event, reported by the Contractor, which requires analysis, verification or attestation by OGX inspection and without which the inspection process cannot continue and be validated.

4.10 - Inspection: Set of coordinated activities designed to implement and document the status of the equipment, piping, sensors, measuring instruments or system.

4.11 - Integrity: Property of equipment, piping, sensors, measuring instruments or system, whether damaged or not, to remain operational offering an acceptable risk to safety and to process reliability.

4.12 - Corrective Maintenance: Maintenance that includes all actions to return a failed system to operational status or available.

4.13 - Predictive Maintenance: Maintenance based on the systematic application of analysis techniques, employing centralized monitoring or sampling means in order to optimize Preventive and Corrective Maintenance.

4.14 - Preventive Maintenance: Maintenance aimed to keep the system in operational status or available by preventing the occurrence of failures. Maintenance intervals are to be defined in the Maintenance Plan.

4.15 - Monitoring: Component intrinsic design function or performed by security interface which guarantees the functionality of a security system when a component or a device has its function reduced or limited, or when there is a hazard due to changes in process conditions.

4.16 - NBR: Brazilian Standard.

4.17 - NR: Guiding Rule (Labor and Employment Ministry).

4.18 - PDCA: Plan (prior to any process, activities must be planned and objectives and method of execution must be set up), Develop (plan implementation by guiding/coaching people and collecting data for control), Check (monitoring and evaluation of the process by employing assessment tools and recording, correcting deviations) and Act (determination of a solution for any deviations found thereby improving the process).

4.19 - PIT - Inspection and Test Plan: A document prepared by the Operator or the Contractor clearly describing the steps to be taken for implementing the inspections and testings based on a standard, code, requirements, specification, or procedure. The document must indicate checks and inspections, HP or WP.

4.20 - Procedure: Written description of all essential parameters and precautions to be followed for a given activity, according to the criteria established in a standard, code or specification.

4.21 - Skilled Professional: A skilled worker that can demonstrate their skills and abilities through the application of written comprehensive examinations and documented results that will allow an individual to engage in a specific activity.

4.22 - Reference Book: A set of documents systematically organized so as to provide an updated memory (history) concerning a particular piece of equipment/facility.

4.23 - SNQC - National System of Qualification and Certification of Personnel.

4.24 - WP - Witness Point: Inspection event, reported by the Contractor, where Contractor notifies OGX inspection aiming the analysis, verification or attestation of the events previously assigned in the Inspection and Test Plan (PIT), without discontinuing the manufacturing process.

4.25 - Qualified Professional: A worker holding legal authority to exercise engineering activities in design, monitoring of operation, maintenance, inspection and supervision of boilers and pressure vessels in accordance with professional regulations in force.


02


5 – Responsibilities: 5.1 - Top Management: must ensure compliance with the conditions specified in this procedure.

5.2 - Unit Management: Ensure the implementation of this procedure in the operational areas under their responsibility.

5.3 - SMS Management: Support the operational areas in the implementation of this procedure, as well as conduct periodic audits to check the implementation and any deviations.

5.4 - Maintenance Management: Perform all activities in compliance with the guidelines in this procedure.

5.5 – Contractor: Operate and carry out this management practice.

6 – Assumptions: 6.1 – Planning 6.1.1 – Procedures

Implementation, inspection and testing procedures (operating procedures) must be prepared so as clearly to set out the actions to be performed. The system must ensure continuous control and updating (PDCA cycle).

The requirements of any procedures issued by contractors must be perfectly aligned with OGX's SGSO guidelines.

Check lists – to validate the evidences that actions have been performed and attested.

Procedures must communicate the minimum qualifications of the personnel involved in tests and inspections and in the development of specific procedures. E.g.: END and Welding Inspectors must be SNQC-certified. EPS qualification and END procedures, Inspectors at required level.

6.1.2 – Plans

PITs (Inspection and Test Plans) and Maintenance Plans must clearly communicate which pieces of equipment belong to the Critical Operational Safety System. The contents of the PIT must be aligned with Annex 3.

The following must be considered in the objective of the Inspection Plans:

• Verification of operation and process compliance with project acceptable variables.

• The inspection plan must cover potential damage mechanisms.

• Provide information about safety conditions required in the activities (work permit, interlock, radiation protection, confined space, working at height, PPE/CPE, etc.).

• Inspection methods must be reliable aiming at:

Detection of damage mechanisms;

Inaccessible areas must be communicated and, where possible, complementary methods/ENDs must be employed;

Frequency of inspections/tests;

Definition of performance acceptability criteria;


02


Progress tracking with results attested by qualified personnel.

• Data and results obtained through inspections will be systematically recorded in order to enable:

Follow-up in subsequent inspections;

Guidelines for planning new inspections;

Orientation for any investigations designed to detect and eliminate the causes of damage

Curbing the progression of the damage;

Becoming part of the record keeping system with the history of the equipment – Reference Book.

• Results will be analyzed according to the criteria established in the procedures, allowing:

Checking/monitoring of equipment current integrity status;

Determining equipment remaining life (life cycle);

Checking serviceability by comparing the results against the records made for other similar pieces of equipment (if possible);

Issuing reports with recommendations for better planning/implementation aiming future inspection.

• The inspection plan must generate maintenance recommendations in order to:

Provide feedback for future inspection plans;

Monitor implementation thereof and the service time;

During plan implementation activities must be inspected and approved by the person in charge of the maintenance or his/her agent.

Note: Inspections and tests performed on pressure vessels and boilers framed in NR-13 must meet the requirements of this standard and be approved by a qualified professional.

6.1.3 – Asset Integrity - Equipment List:

Lists must be compiled for better control:

• List of equipment and systems belonging to the inspections and tests plan;

• List of critical process equipment based on safety and manufacturers information, updated and available to maintenance personnel. Example of critical equipment:

pressure vessels and storage tanks;

control and pressure relief systems;

controls / interlocks / alarms / critical tools;

emergency devices, including shutdown systems;

emergency response equipment;

ventilation systems and devices;

piping and fittings in critical service;

metering/monitoring devices;

emergency communication / alarm systems;


02


key links between process and service;

lifting equipment (slings, lugs, baskets, skids, shackles, cranes, etc.).

grounding and electrical connections;

process pumps/vents/exhausts;

emergency generators;

other specific critical drilling and vessels equipment.

Notes:

1 - Any physical identification on the equipment (plate, label, punching, etc.) must be in compliance with the Equipment List/Inspection, Testing and Maintenance Plan) for field verification, ensuring perfect correlation (traceability) in the system.

2 – The list of facility pieces of equipment must be aligned with the information included in the Description of the Maritime Unit (DUM) or Description of Onshore Unit (DUT).

6.2 – SGSO Quality Assurance Requirements: SGSO requirements must be aligned with OGX SMS Management Manual such as:

• Management Commitment;

• Policies and Objectives;

• SMS Planning;

• Review;

• Internal Communication;

• Audits;

• Provision of Resources;

• Relations with Suppliers and Contractors;

• Metering and Monitoring;

• Continuous Improvement.

6.3 – Rated Areas: Any equipment belonging to rated areas must be clearly identified in the Equipment List. Consider the highest risk level (zone) according to the restrictions adopted in the standard. Operation (construction and installation) thereof must be made in such a way as to prevent the risk of ignition from sparks (static electricity or friction between moving or hot parts and other spark sources).

It is valuable to have a specific training program in place for electrical equipment in potentially explosive atmospheres to inform the personnel about the risks and the basic security concepts.

6.4 – Critical Systems: Critical systems such as controllers, SDCD’s, emergency lighting, protections and instrumentation, must operate properly even if a failure in normal power feeding system occurs, in order to avoid situations that will worsen facility emergency shutdowns. Contingency actions,


02


where possible, must be implemented and described in the operational documents to guarantee the required reliability.

It is relevant to consider such data as: manufacturers’ recommendations, good engineering practices, risk analysis study, previous operation experiences and similarity of equipment/systems.

Any critical equipment must have a reference book clearly demonstrating the history of interventions. Such book must include, at least, the following information:

• A copy of the operating manual supplied by the manufacturer, in Portuguese;

• Technical specifications;

• Inspection, maintenance and certification program;

• Record of inspections, maintenance and certification;

• Action plan for correction of non-conformities detected during inspections, maintenance and certification;

• Identification and signature of the technician appointed by the company.

Inspection Reports must provide at least the following information:

• Items inspected and non-conformities detected, describing those preventing the equipment from being operated and those not interfering with operation;

• Corrective action taken for deterrent non-conformities;

• Identification of Procedure and reference standard;

• Metering devices employed;

• Identification of the Unit, equipment and system;

• Identification of inspector and inspection report;

• Review and approval by SGSO's person responsible;

• Numerical identification.

A correction schedule must be set up to address those non-conformities not preventing the operation of the equipment and not posing any danger to health and safety, either alone or in combination.

6.5 – Mechanical integrity review meetings: The department is expected to convene periodic meetings to review SGSO mechanical integrity with management, aiming to assess:

• Action Plan;

• Internal and external audits;

• Indicators employed and overall performance;

• Effectiveness of corrective and preventive actions;

• Assessment/reassessment of risk identification;

• Documents review (Procedure and records);

• SSO objectives applicable to mechanical integrity;


02


• Effectiveness of inspection, testing and maintenance processes;

• Appraisal of resources applicable to mechanical integrity (material and personnel);

• Analysis of requirements and other requirements applicable to mechanical integrity.

6.6 – Bibliographical References ABNT NBR 14725:2009 – Chemicals;

ABNT NBR ISO 10004:2004 – Solid Wastes;

NR 10 –Electricity Installations and Services;

NR 13 – Boilers and Pressure Vessels;

ABNT NBR 14842:2003 – Criteria for Welding Inspectors;

ABNT NBR ISO 9712:2004 – END, Personnel Qualification;

6.7 – Records: See Check lists in Annex 1.

7 – Adequacy for the Business Not applicable.

8 – Annexes: Annex 1 – Check List.

Annex 2 - Equipment Integrity Flowchart.

Annex 3 - Structure for an Inspection and Testing Plan.

Annex 4 - SGSO Document Structure Model.

Annex 5 - Diagram proposed for the cause and effect analysis of failures in operating system critical equipment.

Annex 6 - Functional diagram for analyzing system breakdown.


02


Annex 1 – Check List

SGSO – Check List (LV)

Nº: REV:

MECHANICAL INTEGRITY Page 1/2

REFERENCE DOCUMENT ANP, SGSO-MN-02-REV.1 - MANUAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE AUDITORIAS DE VERIFICAÇÃO DA CONFORMIDADE DE SGSO (SGSO CONFORMITY CHECKING AUDIT MANUAL.

FACILITY/LOCATION/DATE

SUPPLIER/PERSON IN CHARGE: INSPECTION/PERSON IN CHARGE:

CHECKING ITEMS REPORT

1 IS THERE ANY EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IN PLACE?

2 EMPLOYEE AND CONTRACTORS ACCESS TO RISK AREAS IS CONTROLLED AND FLAGGED?

3 IS THERE ANY BOILERS AND VESSEL INSPECTION PROGRAM AS PER NR-13?

4 IS THE NR-13 PROGRAM CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLEXITY OF THE RISK OF EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES?

5 HAVE BOILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS OPERATORS BEEN GIVEN ADEQUATE TRAINING AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER NR-13.

6 IS THERE ANY INSPECTION AND LOAD TESTING PROGRAM IN PLACE FOR LIFTING EQUIPMENT? IS THERE ANY VISIBLE IDENTIFICATION PLATE (LABEL) COMMUNICATING THE STATUS OF LOAD TESTS?

7 LIFTING EQUIPMENT OPERATORS AND CARRIERS HAVE BEEN GIVEN APPROPRIATE TRAINING?

8 HAVE THE EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN RATED AREAS BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE INSPECTION PROGRAM?

9 IS THERE APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT LOCK-OUT/TAG-OUT ROUTINE IN PLACE DURING MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION SHUTDOWNS?

10 IS THERE A ROUTINE FOR EQUIPMENT SAFE OPERATION IN PLACE?

11 DOES CRITICAL EQUIPMENT HAVE A HISTORY OF MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION AND TESTING (REFERENCE BOOK) AVAILABLE?

12 DOES THE ORGANIZATION SET UP AND KEEP PROCEDURES FOR WORKPLACE DESIGN, PROCESSES, MACHINES OPERATING PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS, IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK AT THE SOURCE?

13 IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR WORK IN PRESSURIZED PIPELINES IN PLACE?

14 IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR APR/PT PREPARATION/ISSUANCE IN PLACE? HAVE APR/PT BEEN APPROPRIATELY ARCHIVED?

15 ARE SGSO RELATED RECORDS (REPORTS, CHECK LISTS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.) LEGIBLE, IDENTIFIABLE, TRACEABLE AND WERE PROPERLY STORED?

16 IS THERE ANY PROCEDURE IN LACE TO DETECT NEEDED TRAINING?


Nº: REV:



02


REFERENCE DOCUMENT ANP, SGSO-MN-02-REV.1 - MANUAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE AUDITORIAS DE VERIFICAÇÃO DA CONFORMIDADE DE SGSO (SGSO CONFORMITY CHECKING AUDIT MANUAL.

FACILITY/LOCATION/DATE

SUPPLIER/PERSON IN CHARGE: INSPECTION/PERSON IN CHARGE:


1 IS THERE ANY EQUIPMENT PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IN PLACE?

2 EMPLOYEE AND CONTRACTORS ACCESS TO RISK AREAS IS CONTROLLED AND FLAGGED?

3 IS THERE ANY BOILERS AND VESSEL INSPECTION PROGRAM AS PER NR-13?

4 IS THE NR-13 PROGRAM CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPLEXITY OF THE RISK OF EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES?

5 HAVE BOILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS OPERATORS BEEN GIVEN ADEQUATE TRAINING AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER NR-13.

6 IS THERE ANY INSPECTION AND LOAD TESTING PROGRAM IN PLACE FOR LIFTING EQUIPMENT? IS THERE ANY VISIBLE IDENTIFICATION PLATE (LABEL) COMMUNICATING THE STATUS OF LOAD TESTS?

7 LIFTING EQUIPMENT OPERATORS AND CARRIERS HAVE BEEN GIVEN APPROPRIATE TRAINING?

8 HAVE THE EQUIPMENT INSTALLED IN RATED AREAS BEEN IDENTIFIED IN THE INSPECTION PROGRAM?

9 IS THERE APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT LOCK-OUT/TAG-OUT ROUTINE IN PLACE DURING MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION SHUTDOWNS?

10 IS THERE A ROUTINE FOR EQUIPMENT SAFE OPERATION IN PLACE?

11 DOES CRITICAL EQUIPMENT HAVE A HISTORY OF MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION AND TESTING (REFERENCE BOOK) AVAILABLE?

12 DOES THE ORGANIZATION SET UP AND KEEP PROCEDURES FOR WORKPLACE DESIGN, PROCESSES, MACHINES OPERATING PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS, IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK AT THE SOURCE?

13 IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR WORK IN PRESSURIZED PIPELINES IN PLACE?

14 IS THERE SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR APR/PT PREPARATION/ISSUANCE IN PLACE? HAVE APR/PT BEEN APPROPRIATELY ARCHIVED?

15 ARE SGSO RELATED RECORDS (REPORTS, CHECK LISTS, CERTIFICATES, ETC.) LEGIBLE, IDENTIFIABLE, TRACEABLE AND WERE PROPERLY STORED?

16 IS THERE ANY PROCEDURE IN LACE TO DETECT NEEDED TRAINING?


02


NOTE: REFER TO ANP MANUAL CHECKLIST (REFERENCE DOCUMENT), MANAGEMENT PRACTICE No. 1, FOR THE INCLUSION OF OTHER VERIFICATION ITEMS.

APPRAISAL REPORT/CAPTION: S - SATISFACTORY N - NOT SATISFACTORY NA - NOT APPLICABLE NOTES:




17 IS THE NEED AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING PROVIDED ASSESSED? IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AVAILABLE? IS THERE A PROCEDURE FOR THIS SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT?

18 DO CONTRACTORS HAVE RISK ASSESSMENT STUDIES IN PLACE FOR CRITICAL PROCESSES (HAZOP, FMEA, ETC.)? IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF SUCH STUDIES AVAILABLE? HAS THIS STUDY BEEN DONE BY QUALIFIED PERSON?

19 IS THE DEFINITION OF THE ASPECTS AND IMPACTS APPLICABLE TO CRITICAL SYSTEMS ALIGNED WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS? IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF PERIODIC REVIEW OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS AVAILABLE?

20 HAVE THE FUNCTIONS, RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES RELATED TO MECHANICAL INTEGRITY BEEN SET UP AND FORMALIZED IN A DOCUMENT?

21 HAS CONTRACTOR APPOINTED A MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE SGSO? WAS THERE FORMAL COMMUNICATION?

22 DOES CONTRACTOR SET UP AND KEEP A PROCEDURE TO ENSURE THAT ALL SGSO RELATED INFORMATION WILL BE DISCLOSED TO EMPLOYEES AND STAKEHOLDERS?

23 IS THERE ANY SGSO RELATED PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AVAILABLE?

24 IS THERE A PROCEDURE FOR PURCHASE, INSPECTION, HANDLING, AND PRESERVATION OF CRITICAL EQUIPMENT IN PLACE? ARE INSPECTIONS RECORDED?

25 ARE CONTRACTORS PERIODICALLY ASSESSED/REASSESSED AS TO SGSO? IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS/AUDITS AVAILABLE?

26 HAVE TESTING AND METERING INSTRUMENTS BEEN CALIBRATED? HAS THE INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION PLAN BEEN APPROVED BY THE QC?

27 IS THERE ANY SYSTEMATIC STATISTICAL EVALUATION FOR EQUIPMENT AVAILABILITY/FITNESS RATE IN PLACE TARGETING MECHANICAL INTEGRITY? IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE OF SUCH SYSTEMATIC APPROACHE AVAILABLE?

28 ARE DETECTED NON-CONFORMITIES GENERATING ACTION PLANS (WHAT? WHO? WHERE? WHEN? WHY? HOW? HOW MUCH?) TO ENABLE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MITIGATING MEASURES RESULTING FROM THE INVESTIGATION/ANALYSIS PROCESS?

29 IS ANY ANALYSIS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PREVENTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN?

30 ARE REVIEW MEETINGS CONVENED TO DISCUSS MECHANICAL INTEGRITY? ARE THE MINUTES OF SUCH MEETINGS AVAILABLE FOR QUERY?

30 ARE REVIEW MEETINGS CONVENED TO DISCUSS MECHANICAL INTEGRITY? ARE THE MINUTES OF SUCH MEETINGS AVAILABLE FOR QUERY?


02


Annex 2 - Equipment Integrity Flowchart.

EQUIPMENT INTEGRITY FLOWCHART

1 • DEFINITION OF INTERNAL AND ESTERNAL DAMAGE MECHANISMS AND

EVIDENCE OF CRITICAL SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION

2 • SGSO PROCEDURE AND INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN (PIT).

3 • OPERATING CONDITIONS MONITORING AND CONTROL

4 • INSPECTION PROCEDURE

5 • MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROCEDURE

6 • APPLICABLE REGISTRATIONS


02


Annex 3 - Structure for an Inspection and Testing Plan

STRUCTURE FOR AN INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN

PIT

GARANTIA DA COMPATIBILID

ADE COM A DOCUMENTAÇÃO APLICÁVEL

INFORMAÇÕES SOBRE OS

DISPOSITIVOS E

EQUIPAMENTOS APLICÁVEIS

ESPECIFICAR OS CRITÉRIOS

DE ACEITAÇÃO

DESCRIÇÃO SUMÁRIA DAS

ETAPAS DO TESTE E/OU INSPEÇÃO COM POSSÍVEIS INTERVENÇÕES

INDICAÇÃO DA QUALIFICAÇÃO

DO PESSOAL REQUERIDO

INFORMAR O TIPO DE

DOCUMENTO DE REGISTRO


02


Annex 4 - SGSO Document Structure Model

SGSO DOCUMENT STRUCTURE MODEL

POLÍTICA DO SGSO

PROCEDIMENTOS DO SISTEMA.

PROCEDIMENTOS/INSTRUÇÕES OPERACIONAIS E PLANOS DE INSPEÇÃO,

TESTES E MANUTENÇÃO.

REGISTROS/EVIDÊNCIAS COMPROBATÓRIAS (RELATÓRIOS, LISTAS DE VERIFICAÇÃO, CERTIFICADOS ETC)


02


Annex 5 - Diagram proposed for the cause and effect analysis of failures in operating system critical equipment.

DIAGRAM PROPOSED FOR THE CAUSE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS OF FAILURES IN OPERATING SYSTEM CRITICAL EQUIPMENT.

FALHA

TESTE/INSPEÇÃO MANUTENÇÃO OPERAÇÃO

PESSOAL MATERIAL

CAUSA

CAUSA CAUSA

CAUSA

CAUSA

CAUSA

CAUSA

CAUSA CAUSA

CAUSA

CAUSA CAUSA

CAUSA


02


Annex 6 - Functional diagram for analyzing system breakdown

FUNCTIONAL DIAGRAM FOR ANALYZING SYSTEM BREAKDOWN

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: Example of failure/effects mode analysis in systems/equipment in items/components by employing splitting levels (review). The purpose is to communicate the operating conditions required for the system.

COMPRESSOR

MOTOR INSTRUMENTAÇÃO

E MONITORAMENTO

RESERVATÓRIO DE AR E

CONEXÕES LUBRIFICAÇÃO REFRIGERAÇÃO

VÁLVULAS DE ALÍVIO E LEITURA

DE PRESSÃO E SOBRECARGA

VÁLVULA DE ALÍVIO E LEITURA DE

PRESSÃO DA ÁGUA DE REFRIGERAÇÃO

1º NÍVEL DE ANÁLISE

2º NÍVEL DE ANÁLISE

3rd LEVEL ANALYSIS