phasor measurements recording in iceland

5
Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland 2002-02-27 Daniel Karlsson ABB, Sweden daniel.h.karlsson@ se.abb.com Helga Jóhannsdóttir Landsvirkjun Iceland [email protected] Background: The Icelandic power system is based on a 132 kV ring around the island, see Figure 1. The load center is located in the southwest, around Reykjavik, and the main generation area is in the mid-south around Sigalda. However, two major plants are located in the north part; Blanda (150 MW) and Krafla (60 MW). Hryggstekkur Laxá 28 MW Sog 89 MW Hamranes Blanda 150 MW Brennimelur Korpa Geitháls Hrútatunga Varmahlíð Rangárvellir Prestbakki Mjólká Geiradalur Glerárskógar Sigalda 150 MW Búrfell 270 MW Transmission lines 220 kV 132 kV 66 kV Vatnshamrar Landsvirkjun's Power System 2000 Hydro power station Substation Geothermal power station Power intensive industry Vatnsfell 90 MW Bjarnarflag 3 MW Laxárvatn Krafla 60 MW Sultartangi 120 MW Hrauneyjafoss 210 MW 150 km Hryggstekkur Laxá 28 MW Sog 89 MW Hamranes Blanda 150 MW Brennimelur Korpa Geitháls Hrútatunga Varmahlíð Rangárvellir Prestbakki Hólar Mjólká Geiradalur Glerárskógar Sigalda 150 MW Búrfell 270 MW Transmission lines 220 kV 132 kV 66 kV Vatnshamrar Teigarhorn Landsvirkjun's Power System 2000 Hydro power station Substation Geothermal power station Power intensive industry Vatnsfell 90 MW Bjarnarflag 3 MW Laxárvatn Krafla 60 MW Sultartangi 120 MW Hrauneyjafoss 210 MW 150 km RES 521: PMU RES 521: PMU RES 521: PMU Figure 1. The Island power system, equipped with PMUs. During high load conditions the power flow in the ring is from the north to the south. If a fault occurs (most frequently on the west side), the ring is split and all the power has to go through the eastern part. Rather heavy, poorly damped, oscillations, might occur. To be able to find out if voltage phase-angles in different parts of the system are suitable inputs to a damping equipment, PMUs have been installed in two critical nodes (the Krafla PMU is not yet commissioned) and recordings can be made. The table in Appendix 1 shows the quantities recorded. The GPS time synchronizing signal is used as a reference for the voltage phase angle. Voltages, active and reactive power flow, and the system frequency are recorded. Based on the voltage real and imaginary part, the magnitude and the phase-angle can be derived. All measurements are three-phase and the recorded voltage is the positive sequence voltage. Field tests: February 27, in the afternoon, the 132 kV line Krafla-Rangárvellir was taken into operation after maintenance work. The logging process was set up in Norway, and data transfer was made via ISDN-modem. The SCADA snapshots before and after the switching are shown in Appendix 2 (The switched line, KR1, is to the upper right in the diagram. Results: The results from this cautious test (the power flow after switch-in of the line was just 5 MW) are shown in the diagrams in Appendix 3. The diagrams shows the data as they appear from the log-files, no filtering has been done. It is impressing to see the high resolution and the distinct signals. The magnitude of the oscillations is limited as well as the duration. The frequency of the oscillation is around 1 Hz. It is especially interesting to compare the voltage phase-angle between Blanda and Sigalda, and the total output active power from the Blanda power station. The correlation is, as expected, obvious. Conclusions: The recordings are very promising. The theory for power system damping based on phasor measurements is known and established [1]. The present recording shows that the ABB PMUs provide high resolution, noise free signals suitable as inputs for power oscillation damping equipment. Future work: It is important for the success of the project that the logging on site in Sigalda will be established very soon, to provide continuous logging, to be able to catch spontaneous as well as planned events. Acknowledgements: The recording made by Arve Sollie, is gratefully acknowledged, as well as the PMU-setup work performed both in Sweden and in Iceland, by Thórhallur Hrafnsson and Johan Sälj. Reference [1] Samuelsson, O. and Eliasson, B., “Damping of Electro-Mechanical Oscillations in a Multimachine System by Direct Load Control“, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 1604-1609, 1997.

Upload: juan-felipe-reyes-m

Post on 25-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Aplicación de PMU's en el monitoreo de redes eléctricas

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland

Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland 2002-02-27

Daniel Karlsson ABB, Sweden

daniel.h.karlsson@ se.abb.com

Helga Jóhannsdóttir Landsvirkjun

Iceland [email protected]

Background: The Icelandic power system is based on a 132 kV ring around the island, see Figure 1. The load center is located in the southwest, around Reykjavik, and the main generation area is in the mid-south around Sigalda. However, two major plants are located in the north part; Blanda (150 MW) and Krafla (60 MW).

Hryggstekkur

Laxá 28 MW

Sog 89 MW

Hamranes

Blanda 150 MW

BrennimelurKorpa

Geitháls

Hrútatunga

VarmahlíðRangárvellir

Prestbakki

Hólar

Mjólká

GeiradalurGlerárskógar

Sigalda 150 MW

Búrfell 270 MWTransmission lines

220 kV132 kV

66 kV

VatnshamrarTeigarhorn

Landsvirkjun's Power System 2000

Hydro power station

SubstationGeothermal power station

Power intensive industry

Vatnsfell 90 MW

Bjarnarflag 3 MW

Laxárvatn Krafla 60 MW

Sultartangi 120 MWHrauneyjafoss 210 MW

150 km

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

Hryggstekkur

Laxá 28 MW

Sog 89 MW

Hamranes

Blanda 150 MW

BrennimelurKorpa

Geitháls

Hrútatunga

VarmahlíðRangárvellir

Prestbakki

Hólar

Mjólká

GeiradalurGlerárskógar

Sigalda 150 MW

Búrfell 270 MWTransmission lines

220 kV132 kV

66 kV

VatnshamrarTeigarhorn

Landsvirkjun's Power System 2000

Hydro power station

SubstationGeothermal power station

Power intensive industry

Vatnsfell 90 MW

Bjarnarflag 3 MW

Laxárvatn Krafla 60 MW

Sultartangi 120 MWHrauneyjafoss 210 MW

150 km

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

ECEC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

ECEC

RES 521: PMU

EC

RES 521: PMU

ECEC

RES 521: PMU

Figure 1. The Island power system, equipped with PMUs.

During high load conditions the power flow in the ring is from the north to the south. If a fault occurs (most frequently on the west side), the ring is split and all the power has to go through the eastern part. Rather heavy, poorly damped, oscillations, might occur. To be able to find out if voltage phase-angles in different parts of the system are suitable inputs to a damping equipment, PMUs have been installed in two critical nodes (the Krafla PMU is not yet commissioned) and recordings can be made. The table in Appendix 1 shows the quantities recorded. The GPS time synchronizing signal is used as a reference for the voltage phase angle. Voltages, active and reactive power flow, and the system frequency are recorded. Based on the voltage real and imaginary part, the magnitude and the phase-angle can be derived. All measurements are three-phase and the recorded voltage is the positive sequence voltage.

Field tests: February 27, in the afternoon, the 132 kV line Krafla-Rangárvellir was taken into operation after maintenance work. The logging process was set up in Norway, and data transfer was made via ISDN-modem. The SCADA snapshots before and after the switching are shown in Appendix 2 (The switched line, KR1, is to the upper right in the diagram.

Results: The results from this cautious test (the power flow after switch-in of the line was just 5 MW) are shown in the diagrams in Appendix 3. The diagrams shows the data as they appear from the log-files, no filtering has been done. It is impressing to see the high resolution and the distinct signals. The magnitude of the oscillations is limited as well as the duration. The frequency of the oscillation is around 1 Hz. It is especially interesting to compare the voltage phase-angle between Blanda and Sigalda, and the total output active power from the Blanda power station. The correlation is, as expected, obvious.

Conclusions: The recordings are very promising. The theory for power system damping based on phasor measurements is known and established [1]. The present recording shows that the ABB PMUs provide high resolution, noise free signals suitable as inputs for power oscillation damping equipment.

Future work: It is important for the success of the project that the logging on site in Sigalda will be established very soon, to provide continuous logging, to be able to catch spontaneous as well as planned events.

Acknowledgements: The recording made by Arve Sollie, is gratefully acknowledged, as well as the PMU-setup work performed both in Sweden and in Iceland, by Thórhallur Hrafnsson and Johan Sälj.

Reference

[1] Samuelsson, O. and Eliasson, B., “Damping of Electro-Mechanical Oscillations in a Multimachine System by Direct Load Control“, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 1604-1609, 1997.

Page 2: Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland

Appendix 1 Power System Quantities Recorded by the PMUs in Blanda and Sigalda Voltage Sigalda 130 kV real part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Sigalda 130 kV imaginary part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Sigalda 220 kV real part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Sigalda 220 kV imaginary part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Blanda 130 kV real part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Blanda 130 kV imaginary part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Blanda Unit 1 real part, positive sequence, [kV] Voltage Blanda Unit 1 imaginary part, positive sequence, [kV] Active Power Sigalda-Prestbakki [MW] Reactive Power Sigalda-Prestbakki [Mvar] Active Power Sigalda Trafo 220/132 [MW] Reactive Power Sigalda Trafo 220/132 [Mvar] Active Power Sigalda Trafo Unit 1 [MW] Reactive Power Sigalda Trafo Unit 1 [Mvar] Active Power Blanda-Laxárvatn [MW] Reactive Power Blanda-Laxárvatn [Mvar] Active Power Blanda-Varmahliđ [MW] Reactive Power Blanda-Varmahliđ [Mvar] Active Power Blanda Trafo Unit 1 [MW] Reactive Power Blanda Trafo Unit 1 [Mvar] Active Power Blanda Unit 1 [MW] Reactive Power Blanda Unit 1 [Mvar] Frequency [Hz]

Page 3: Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland

Appendix 2 SCADA Snapshot – steady state conditions – before the switching

SCADA Snapshot – steady state conditions – before the switching

Page 4: Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland

Appendix 3 1(2) Recordings from the PMUs in Blanda and Sigalda – 2002-02-27

01

23

45

134.3

134.4

134.5

134.6

134.7

134.8V

oltage Magnitude B

landa 130 kV

Voltage [kV]

Tim

e [s]0

12

34

58

8.5 9

9.5 10

10.5 11

11.5 12V

oltage Phase−

Angle B

landa−S

igalda 130 kV

Angle [degrees]

Tim

e [s]

01

23

45

30 32 34 36 38 40A

ctive Pow

er Blanda−

Varm

ahlid 130 kV

Active Power [MW]

Tim

e [s]0

12

34

588 90 92 94 96 98

Active P

ower B

landa−Laxarvatn 130 kV

Active Power [MW]

Tim

e [s]

Page 5: Phasor Measurements Recording in Iceland

Appendix 3 2(2)

01

23

45

122

124

126

128

130

132A

ctive Pow

er Blanda 130 kV

Active Power [MW]

Tim

e [s]0

12

34

5−

10

−8

−6

−4

−2 0

Reactive P

ower B

landa 130 kV

Reactive Power [Mvar]

Tim

e [s]

01

23

45

127.8

127.9

128

128.1

128.2

128.3V

oltage Magnitude S

igalda 130 kV

Voltage [kV]

Tim

e [s]0

12

34

5217.3

217.4

217.5

217.6

217.7

217.8V

oltage Magnitude S

igalda 220 kV

Voltage [kV]

Tim

e [s]