phil sandy - festival of new mr - 2014

24
The Fes’val of NewMR 2014 would not be possible without our sponsors. Thanks to: Our Pla’num Sponsor for 2014 Silver Sponsors Session Sponsors Media Partner Fes’val Supporters Schlesinger Associates GMI krea The Fes’val of 2014

Upload: ray-poynter

Post on 17-Jul-2015

16 views

Category:

Marketing


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

The  Fes'val  of  NewMR  2014  would  not  be  possible  without  our  sponsors.  Thanks  to:    

Our  Pla'num  Sponsor  for  2014  

Silver  Sponsors  

Session  Sponsors  

Media  Partner   Fes'val  Supporters  

•  Schlesinger  Associates  •  GMI  •  krea  

The  Fes'val  of   2014  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Applying  innova'on  research  to  non-­‐profits

2014  Pla9num  Sponsor  

Phil  Sandy    Chief  Research  Officer,      UK  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

In  some  markets  awareness  of  Amnesty  Interna9onal  is  as  high  as  90%    

However,  even  then  people  s9ll  lack  a  sense  of  connec9on,  so  fundraising  efforts  can  suffer      

…why  is  that?    and  how  can  innova'on  research  help    

deepen  the  connec'on  to  aQract  donors?  

?  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

The  research  journey  we  went    on  with  Amnesty  is  similar  to  that  of  

other  innova'on  challenges  

Gather  clues  

Find  gaps  

Reveal  challenges  &  opportuni9es  

1  

2  

3  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

The  research  journey  Brands  engage  in  MR  because  they  wish  to  make    informed  business  decisions  to  drive  growth  

•  Start  with  an  end  in  mind:  immerse  deep  into  the  process  with  a  curious  aNtude  

•  Generate  hypotheses  for  the  different  possible  direc9ons  a  brand  can  change/evolve  

•  Provide  a  simplified  framework  of  the  real  world  

1  

2  

3  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

How  we  do  it  

PERCEPTIONS   NEEDS  &  ATTITUDES  

GAPS  &  CHALLENGES   OPPORTUNITIES  

How  is  the  brand  perceived  today?  

The  ‘context’  for  the  brand  

Percep9ons  vs.  needs  

Based  on  the  sum  of  learnings  we  iden9fy  opportuni9es  to  address  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

When  iden'fying  opportuni'es,  our  experience  is  that  successful  innova'on:  

1.  Is  built  on  the  founda9on  of  a  strong  insight  

2.  Has  a  single-­‐minded  focus  on  a  tangible  ‘big  benefit’  (with  emo9onal  resonance)  

3.  Persuades  through  a  clear  ‘reason  to  believe’  

1  

2  

3  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

What  we  did  for  Amnesty  (…the  details)  

4,612  respondents  

15  countries  

300  per  market  

Online  survey  with  online  representa9ve  sample  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Amnesty  =  a  courageous  &  global  champion  of  ‘civil  &  poli'cal’  rights  

ü  Oppose  death  penalty  

ü  Oppose  torture  

ü  Oppose  human  trafficking  

ü  Children  &  women’s  rights  

ü  Freedom  of  speech  

ü  Equality  of  minori9es  

ü  Oppose  discrimina9on  

PERCEPTIONS  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

BUT,  s'll  has  a  job  to  do  

•  Awareness  levels  vary  hugely,  from  as  high  as  90%  to  as  low  as  just  6%  

•  Only  4-­‐15%  (by  region)  claim  to  have  a  good  understanding  of  Amnesty’s  ac9vi9es  

•  A  large  propor9on  s9ll  feel  no  real  connec'on  with  Amnesty  

PERCEPTIONS  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

There  are  excep'ons  –  i.e.  markets  where  people  feel  a  beQer  connec'on  with  Amnesty  

•  France  

•  Italy  

•  Poland  

•  India  

Why  these  markets?  

….we  will  return  to  this  later  in  today’s  session!  

PERCEPTIONS  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Top  issues  NGOs  expected  to  address:  ü  Human  trafficking  ü  Discrimina9on  

ü  Poverty  

ü  Access  to  water  &  food  

ü  Children’s  rights  

ü  Women’s  rights  

ü  Disaster  relief  ü  Educa9on  

ü  Healthcare  

 

 

 

NEEDS  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Issues  found  ‘most  important’:  

BUT,  when  asked  what  is  most  important  the  consistent  top-­‐3  are:  

•  Access  to  water  &  food  

•  Educa9on  

•  Health  care  

NEEDS  

!!!  

!!  

!  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Mis-­‐match  between  Amnesty’s  core  themes  &  the  issues  found  important  •             Opposing  torture  &              the  death  penalty  have  been  core  themes  for  Amnesty  

•  However,  both  appear  low  down  in  people’s  associa'ons  with  human  rights  

•  Amnesty  has  targeted  ‘civil  &  poli9cal  rights’  –  but  issues  felt  most  important  are  more  fundamental  on  Maslow’s  hierarchy  of  needs  (i.e.  access  to  water/food,  healthcare,  educa9on)  

1 2

GAPS  &  CHALLENGES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Worse,  Amnesty’s  core  themes  can  have  some  nega've  associa'ons  

•  Brazil:  ‘human  rights’  abused  to  protect  bandits  &  criminals  

•  UK:  ‘human  rights’  some9mes  abused  by  criminals  &  asylum  seekers,  plus  some  nega9ve  connec9on  with  unelected  EU  officials  imposing  European  rulings    

•  Russia:  Some  resentment  that  ‘human  rights’  are  “something  dictated  by  the  western  world”  

 

 

GAPS  &  CHALLENGES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Issues  associated  with  human  rights  are  quite  abstract  /  complex  

ü  Equity  /  equal  rights  

ü  Fairness  

ü  Freedom  (speech,  opinion)  

ü  Basic  rights  

ü  Cons9tu9on  /  law  

ü  Women’s  rights  /  children’s  rights  

GAPS  &  CHALLENGES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Local  differences  add  to  complexity    •  Russia:  ‘Privacy’  is  #2  associa9on  with  human  rights  in  Russia,  much  

higher  than  the  global  average.  Meanwhile  Russians  much  LESS  likely  than  average  to  associate  human  rights  with  ‘sexual  iden9ty’  

•  Japan:  generally  more  ‘indifferent’.  Top-­‐3  associa9ons  quite  different  to  global  average  =  #1  privacy,  #2  social  security,  #3  disaster  relief  

•  South  Africa:  ‘Freedom  to  speak  one’s  own  language’  rela9vely  more  important  vs.  global  average  

•  USA:  ‘Freedom  of  religion’  is  rela9vely  more  important  here  

•  Germany:  -­‐  ‘Opposing  death  penalty’  &  ‘Monitoring  &  restric9ng  use  of  drones’  rela9vely  more  important  to  Germans  

GAPS  &  CHALLENGES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

Ways  to  build  more  ‘connec'on’  with  Amnesty?  

Coming  from  our  background  in  innova9on,  we  suggest  to:  

1.  Build  on  the  founda9on  of  a  strong  insight  2.  Focus  on  a  tangible  ‘big  benefit’  with  emo9onal  

resonance  

3.  Support  with  a  clear  ‘reason  to  believe’    

OPPORTUNITIES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

INSIGHT:  establish  a  more  posi've  insight  •  In  our  experience  ‘posi9ve’  insights  (i.e.  focussed  on  the  desired  posi9ve  

outcome)  consistently  outperform  ‘nega9vely’  worded  insights  

•  We  are  not  sugges9ng  that  Amnesty  changes  its  core  values,  but  rather  Amnesty  needs  to  inspire  people  to  care  more  about  the  causes  it  holds  dear  (so  as  to  alract  donors)  

•  E.g.  Oxfam’s  ‘Lim  Lives’  campaign  has  a  very  posi9ve  insight  as  base:    –  “Li$  one  person  and  they  will  li$  others.  When  you  support  Oxfam's  life-­‐changing  work,  

unstoppable  change  takes  root  in  communiAes  around  the  world”  

•  IMPLICATION:  Can  Amnesty  learn  from  these  other  ‘rights’  areas  -­‐  and  either  broaden  its  campaign  base,  or  find  fresh  insights  from  the  posiAve  stories  around  why  exisAng  supporters  feel  they  are  making  a  difference?  

OPPORTUNITIES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

BIG  BENEFIT:  communicate  a  tangible  big  benefit  

•  The  best  benefits  are  clear,  focused  &  tangible.  Plus  they  address  an  emo9onal  need.  

•  The  challenge  for  Amnesty  is  that  its  core  tradi9onal  themes  have  been  either  more  abstract,  or  poten9ally  more  controversial.    

•  By  contrast,  other  NGOs  target  ‘benefits’  which  are  more  tangible/less  abstract,  with  more  personal  resonance  &  higher  empathy  /  stronger  emo9onal  connec9on  

•  In  the  markets  where  people  report  stronger  than  average  connec9on  levels  with  Amnesty  (France,  Poland,  India)  we  see  more  associa9on  of  Amnesty  with  ac9vi9es  that  benefit  a  broader  popula9on  base  =  educa9on  of  the  popula9on;  offering  legal  aid;  empowering  certain  groups  (e.g.  women).  

•  IMPLICATION:  Can  Amnesty  find  a  way  to  tap  into  ‘benefits’  with  broader  resonance?  Or  beQer  highlight  the  work  it  already  does  that  benefits  more  people?  

OPPORTUNITIES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

REASON  TO  BELIEVE:  explain  how  dona'ons  will  be  used  in  a  way  that  ‘connects’  

•  The  RTB  is  there  to  give  credibility  to  ‘how’  the  promised  benefit  will  be  delivered  –  E.g.  “£25  could  drill  3  wells  to  provide  clean,  safe  water”  (Oxfam)  

–  E.g.  A  televised  event  can  tell  an  upliming  emo9onal  ‘before  &  amer’  story  about  how  an  ini9a9ve  has  transformed  lives  (Children  in  Need,  UK).    

•  This  is  poten9ally  much  tougher  for  Amnesty,  both  due  to  the  more  abstract  nature  of  some  human-­‐rights  issues,  and  the  more  ‘squeamish’  nature  of  others  (e.g.  torture,  death  penalty).  

•  Amnesty  does  already  make  RTB  claims  such  as  “£10  per  month  enables  us  to  send  researchers  around  the  world  to  invesAgate  reports  of  torture  &  abuse”  –  but  a)  addresses  an  ‘issue’  low  down  peoples  ‘importance’  list;  b)  is  s9ll  not  so  ‘tangible’  or  specific  as  claims  such  as  the  Oxfam  one.  

•  IMPLICATION:  Can  Amnesty  develop  RTB  claims  that  address  more  resonaAng  issues,  with  more  specific  (quanAfied)  examples?    

 

OPPORTUNITIES  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

THANK  YOU  

2014  Pla9num  Sponsor  

Phil  Sandy    Chief  Research  Officer,      UK  

The  Fes'val  of  NewMR  2014  would  not  be  possible  without  our  sponsors.  Thanks  to:    

Our  Pla'num  Sponsor  for  2014  

Silver  Sponsors  

Session  Sponsors  

Media  Partner   Fes'val  Supporters  

•  Schlesinger  Associates  •  GMI  •  krea  

The  Fes'val  of   2014  

Phil Sandy, Winkle, UK Festival of NewMR, December 2014

When  challenges  are  most  complex  is  when  Winkle’s  at  its  best.  We  cut  out  the  noise  and  zoom  in  to  opportuni9es  with  the  greatest  impact.  Helping  you  forge  ahead  quickly,  decisively,  boldly.      

Contact  us:  [email protected]  

BOLDLY    SIMPLE