phsb 612: interventions diane m. dowdy, ph.d. spring 2008
TRANSCRIPT
PHSB 612: Interventions
Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D.
Spring 2008
Public Health InterventionsAre created to generate specific outcomes
or effects+ Well-defined group+ Specific period of time+ Concentrated set of activities
Includes evaluation+ Measures impact of intervention+ Prompts the establishment of goals and
objectives+ Understand why or how the intervention
worked+ Future planning
Describe the
problem
Explore context and
identify determinants
Test intervention
s
Formulate intervention
s
Assess efficacy of
intervention
Assess effectiveness
of intervention
Monitor adequacy and impact of large-scale
interventions
Identify risk factors
Select or formulate possible
interventions
Definitions
Theory“A set of interrelated concepts, definitions, and
propositions that presents a systematic view of events or situations by specifying relations among variables in order to explain and predict the events or situations.”
Glanz, Lewis, & Rimer, 1997
Importance of Theory in Interventions
Guide the search for why people are not following public health and medical advice or not caring for themselves in healthy ways
Pinpoint what one needs to know before developing and organizing an intervention program
Provide insight in how to shape program strategies to reach people and organizations and make an impact on them.
Identify what should be monitored, measured, or compared in a program evaluation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Theory of Unreasonable Actions All Other Theories
Explaining Health Behavior
97%
3%
From Dr. Burdine
How Does a Model Differ from a Theory?
“Health behavior and the guiding concepts for influencing it are far too complex to be explained by a single unified theory.
“Models draw on a number of theories to help people understand a specific problem in a particular setting or context.”
“Unlike theories, models do not attempt to explain the processes underlying learning, but only to represent them”
From: Glanz, Lewis, and Rimer, 1997
IOM Report: Promoting Health.Intervention Strategies from Social and
Behavioral Research
Recommendation 1: Social and behavioral factors have a broad and profound impact on health across a wide range of conditions and disabilities. A better balance is needed between the clinical approach to disease, presently the dominant public health model for most risk factors, and research and intervention efforts that address generic social and behavioral determinants of disease, injury, and disability.
Recommendation 2: Rather than focusing interventions on a single or limited number of health determinants, interventions on social and behavioral factors should link multiple levels of influence (i.e., individual, interpersonal, institutional, community and policy levels).
IOM Report
Research and intervention efforts should be
based on an ecological model.
Assumes that health and well-being are affected by a dynamic interaction…
Among biology, behavior, and the environment … that
Unfolds over the life course of individuals, families, and communities.
Also assumes that age, gender, race, ethnicity, and socio-
economic differences shape the context in which individuals function…therefore influencing (both directly and indirectly) health risks and resources.
these critical demographics should receive careful consideration in the design and implementation of interventions.
PolicyOrganizationa
lCommunity
Interpersonal
Individual
Source: McLeroy et al, 1998
Social Ecological Model
This ecological model is best operationalized by a social environmental approach to health and
health interventions. It places emphasis on how health is influenced by:
Biological/genetic functioning and pre-
disposition Social and familial relationships Environmental contingencies Broader social and economic trends
Levels of Behavioral Change Interventions
Interventions can be aimed at multiple levels:
Personal or interpersonal levelThe organizational or institutional levelThe health care levelThe environmental levelThe policy or legislative level
Program Outcomes – Goals and Objectives
Theories/ models
Available resources
Appropriate fit
Past experiences
Levels of Influence: Intrapersonal Interpersonal Institution/Org Community Public Policy
Planned intervention
Intervention activities
McKenzie and Smeltzer
RE-AIM: Plan, Evaluate, and Report
Studies
R……. Increase Reach
E……. Increase Effectiveness
A…… Increase Adoption
I……. Increase Implementation
M…… Increase Maintenance
Purposes of RE-AIM
Individual level:Reach to target population
Efficacy/Effectiveness demonstrated
Setting level:Adoption by organization
Implementation as intended
Both:Maintenance on both individual/organizational level