pltn 3
DESCRIPTION
Kuliah PMEL PLTN 3TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
0
INDONESIANUCLEAR POWER PLANT
BLUE PRINT
Lecturer : SYARIFFUDDIN MAHMUDSYAH
![Page 2: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1
LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN
![Page 3: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2
Sumber IAEA 2006
1
59
31
6
6
4
2
15
31
0
15
9
20
56
10
2
18
104
2
2
1
7
17
5
9
2
1
4
1
1
6
4
PERKEMBANGAN PLTN DI DUNIALAMPIRAN 1
Kembali
![Page 4: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
3
JENIS TEKNOLOGI PLTN YANG
DIOPERASIKAN SECARA KOMERSIAL
(xx) Number of units by constructor
Source AREVA
1. PWR ( Reaktor Air
Bertekanan Tinggi )
2. BWR ( Reaktor Air Didih )
3. HWR ( Reaktor Air Berat )
4. FBR ( Reaktor Pembiak
Cepat )
MWe installed
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
B&WFra
ma
tom
e A
NP
(Pera
ncis
)
We
sti
ng
ho
use
(U
SA
)
AB
B-C
E
ABB
Mitsubishi(Jepang)
General
Electric(USA)
Hitachi
Toshiba(Jepang)
Minatom
VVER(Rusia)
AECL(Kanada)
(69)
(7)
(17)
(6)
(78)
(25)
(10)
(55)
(51)
(32)(18)
(29)
PWR BWR HWR
(2)
(1)
FBR
NP
I/F
ram
ato
me
LAMPIRAN 2
Kembali
![Page 5: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
4
KECELAKAAN NUKLIR YANG PERNAH TERJADI
LAMPIRAN 3
NO. TINGKAT KEJADIAN SKALA KEJADIAN CONTOH PLTN
1. Kecelakaan besar Skala 7 Chernobyl, Rusia, 1986
2. Kecelakaan serius Skala 6
3. Kecelakaan dengan resiko ke lingkungan Skala 5 Three Mile Island, USA, 1979
4. Kecelakaan tanpa resiko ke lingkungan Skala 4 Saint Laurent, Perancis, 1980
5. Peristiwa serius Skala 3 Vandellos, Spanyol, 1989
6. Peristiwa biasa Skala 2
7. Peristiwa tidak normal Skala 1
8. Di bawah skala Skala 0
Skala INES dengan kategori kejadian nuklir
Catatan:
- Kejadian nuklir pada INES (International Nuclear Event Scale) dikalsifikasikan dalam 7 skala;
- Skala 4 s.d. skala 7 dikategorikan sebagai “Kecelakaan Nuklir”;
- Skala 1 s.d. skala 3 dikategorikan sebagai “Peristiwa Nuklir”;
- Kejadian yang tidak memiliki tingkat gangguan keselamatan yang terukur dikategorikan skala 0, dan diistilahkan sebagai “Penyimpangan”
1.Pada Three Mile Island seluruh zat radioaktif terkungkung dalam sistem kontaimen sehingga tidak ada korban jiwa.
2.Pada kecelakaan chernobyl menimbulkan korban 31 orang korban jiwa dan kontaminasi lingkungan karena tidak mempunyai kontaimen.
Sumber : INES 2001 Edition IAEA, OECD, NEA Kembali
![Page 6: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
5
PROSPEK PLTN DI DUNIA
USA
Kapasitas Nuklir
bertambah 50 GWe
pada 2020
FINLAND
Reaktor ke-5
Sumber : TotalFinaElf0%
20%
40%
60%
1900 1950 2000 2050
Batubara EBT
BBM
Gas
HidroNuklir
KOREA
Kapasitas Nuklir
bertambah 9 GWe
by 2015
INDIA
Kapasitas Nuklir
bertambah
18 GWe by 2020
JAPAN
Kapasitas Nuklir
bertambah 20Gwe
by 2015
CINA
Kapasitas Nuklir
bertambah 30 Gwe
by 2020
BRAZIL
Program Nuklir
bangkit & berkembang
LAMPIRAN 4
Kembali
![Page 7: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
6
KEBUTUHAN TENAGA LISTRIK
WILAYAH URAIAN SATUAN 2006 2010 2015 2015 2025
Jawa-Madura-Bali
(JAMALI)
Kebutuhan TWh 87 118 175 250 348
Beban Puncak GW 16 21 31 43 59
Tambahan Pembangkit GW 3 10 21 39 55
Luar Jamali Kebutuhan TWh 24 34 50 72 102
Beban Puncak GW 5 7 11 15 21
Tambahan Pembangkit GW 1 5 9 15 22
Indonesia Kebutuhan TWh 111 152 225 322 450
Beban Puncak GW 21 28 42 58 80
Tambahan Pembangkit GW 4 15 30 54 77
Sumber: RUKN 2005-2025
LAMPIRAN 5
Kembali
![Page 8: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7
0
100
200
300
400
500
2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
Tahun
TWh
Kebutuhan Jamali Kebutuhan Luar Jamali Kebutuhan Indonesia
GRAFIK KEBUTUHAN TENAGA LISTRIKLAMPIRAN 6
Kembali
![Page 9: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
8
PANGSA ENERGI PRIMER
UNTUK PEMBANGKITAN TENAGA LISTRIK
(Jawa-Madura-Bali)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
20052006
20072008
20092010
20112012
20132014
20152016
20172018
20192020
20212022
20232024
2025
Nuklir Batubara Panas bumi Gas Air BBM
Tahun 2005 2025
Batubara 43% 58%
Air 10% 4%
Gas 19% 27%
Panas bumi 6% 4%
BBM 22% 3%
Nuklir 0% 4%
KOMPOSISI ENERGI
TWH
LAMPIRAN 7
Kembali
![Page 10: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
9
POTENSI SUMBER DAYA ENERGI (Tahun 2004)
A. Energi Fosil
B. Energi Terbarukan
JENIS ENERGI TOTAL CADANGANCADANGAN TERBUKTI
PRODUKSI CADANGAN/ PRODUKSI
Minyak 86,9 miliar bbl 9 miliar bbl 500 juta bbl 18 tahun
Gas 384,7 TSCF 182 TSCF 3,0 TSCF 61 tahun
Batubara 57 miliar ton 19,3 miliar ton 130 juta ton 147 tahun
JENIS ENERGI TOTAL CADANGAN EKIVALEN PEMANFAATANKAPASITAS
TERPASANG
Air 845,00 juta BOE 75,67 GW 6.851,00 GWh 10 tahun
Panas Bumi 219,00 juta BOE 27,00 GW 2.593,50 GWh 62 tahun
Mini/ Mikro hidro 458,75 MW 458,75 MW 147 tahun
Biomasa 49,81 GW
Tenaga Surya 4,8 kWh/m2/hari
Tenaga Angin 9,29 GW
Uranium (Nuklir) 24.112 Ton e.q.3 GW
untuk 11 tahun *)
* Hanya di daerah Kalan-Kalbar
LAMPIRAN 8
Kembali
![Page 11: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
10
ENERGI MIX NASIONAL TAHUN 2025(Sesuai Perpres No. 5 / 2006)
Minyak
Bumi 20 %
Gas 30 %
Batubara 33 %
EBT 17 %
Bahan Bakar Nabati
(Bio-fuel) 5 %
Panas Bumi 5 %
Biomasa, Nuklir, Air,
Surya, Angin 5 %
Batubara yang dicairkan
(Coal Liquefaction) 2 %
LAMPIRAN 9
Kembali
![Page 12: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
11
SEP. 12, 2007
Sung, [email protected]
Reduction Method of Spent Resin Generated
from
SG BD Ion Exchangers of PWR NPPS
![Page 13: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
12
1. Introduction
2. Review of the early SGBD IX Replace Criteria
3. Experiment of IX Resin Capacity
4. Review of Experimental Results
5. Conclusions
Contents
![Page 14: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
13
KHNP’s R&D Institute (1)
![Page 15: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
14
KHNP’s R&D Institute (2)
![Page 16: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
15
KHNP’s R&D Institute (3)
![Page 17: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
16
○ Background
In Project of Kori #3,4 NPP PSR,
Main system of LLW Resin : SG BD Demineralizer
Cause : Secondary Side water pH control agent : NH3 ⇒ ETA-
AVT
The SGBD cation loads was increased about 2~3 times
Spent Resin Radwaste : Large volume and no Industrial waste…
Not easy to treat the ash, though spent resin is almost
disposal object itself
PSR Team treated as safety issue item
PSR Team(NETEC) and Kori 2 Chemistry Section agreed to the
problems and solved the sophisticated problems
1. Introduction (1)
![Page 18: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
17
Block the leaked
ActivitiesRecovery Heat
RecoveryBD Bleed
water
Capacity : 5000ℓ×2eaDesign flow : 45ℓ/secNormal flow : 45ℓ/sec
SG BD system’ functions
1. Introduction (2)
![Page 19: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
18
SFP IX2.0ton (9.4%)
LRW System IX1.7ton (7.1%)
CVCS IX3.3ton (18.9%)
SG BD Demin15.4ton/Yr
(65%)
Spent IX Resin Source
0 22.4 ton/Yr2.12 t 3.71 t 7.95 t
1. Introduction (3)
![Page 20: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
19
IX Mechanism
Ion Exchange Resin ?
Model of Ix ResinBead of amorphous and
sphere type high polymers
100billions IX sites / bead
1. Introduction (4)
![Page 21: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
20
2. Review of the early SGBD IX Replace
Criteria (1)
• IX Resin Replacement Procedures of SGBD IX
- No standard Criteria of SGBD IX
- Na was a typical ion to determine the IX removal
capacity in many plants.
- However, Na was not a typical ion to determine IX
removal capacity other plants ( See the next page table )
In USA NPPs, (from EPRI report)
In Domestic Plants,
• IX Resin Replacing Procedures of SGBD IX
- 22 of 73 PWR plant didn’t consider the Na ion as IX
replacement Criteria
![Page 22: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
21
Criteria
Plnat
IX Replacing Criterianote
Operation Demin. After Demin.
A Plant Na+ ≥ 5ppbC.C ≥0.5 μS/㎝
Na, Cl-, SO4-2 ≥ 2 ppb
B Plant Na+. DF ≤1 Na+. Cl-, C.C DF ≤1 DF = Inlet Conc.
Outlet Conc.
C Plant SO4-2 DF ≤1 SO4
-2 DF ≤1
D Plant C.C increase or Na+≥2ppb C.C≥0.2 μS/㎝
Na+, Cl-, SO4-2 ≥ 2ppb
E PlantC.C≥0.5μS/㎝
Na+, Cl-, SO4-2 ≥ 2 ppb
NA1 Operation,
1 Stand-by
F Plant C.C≥0.1μS/㎝ NA “
G PlantC.C≥0.1μS/㎝
Na+≥3 ppb Cl-, SO4-2≥5ppb
NA “
Table : IX Exchanger Replacement Criteria of Domestic Plants
2. Review of the early SGBD IX Replace
Criteria (2)
![Page 23: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
22
Scheme and Shots
3. Experiment of IX Resin Capacity (1)
![Page 24: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
23
Ion selectivity experiment with H-type IX resin
Volume Flow
N H4
Na CsE TA
3. Experiment of IX Resin Capacity (2)
![Page 25: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
24
ETA, NH4, Na Ion selectivity experiment with Cs-type IX resin
Na
Cs
ETA
NH4
3. Experiment of IX Resin Capacity (3)
![Page 26: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
25
E TA
N H4
Na
Cs
N H4
Na
E TA
Cs Saturated IX
Resin
Same characteristics of new IX Resin
4. Review of Experimental Results (1)
![Page 27: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
26
• Experiment : 1/80000 of 2.5 ㎥ which was equal to 30㎖ of resin capacity
and experiment was achieved for resin which is 30 times of addicted chemical material
• Experimental result (ion selectivity on resin) : H+ < NH4 + ≤ ETA+ < Na+ < Cs
Ionmolecular
weight
ion concentration system
concentratio
n
(ppm)
ratio with
system ion
concentration(ppm) (meq/l)
ETA+ 61.08 122.16 2 3.5 35
NH3+ 17 34 2 0.2 170
Na+ 23 46 2 0.001 46000
Cs+ 133 266 2 0 ∞
total 101.08 202.16 8 3.701 -
Ion Absorbing Capacity on Resin
4. Review of Experimental Results (2)
![Page 28: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
27
• ETA
0.5 [Output conc./Input conc.] Breakthrough time(T) ->
(ETA+NH3) : Na : Cs = 2T : 3T : 4T
This phenomenon came from ETA/NH3, Na and Cs ‘s different selectiveness.
• NH3
NH3 was eluted after ETA and exchange reaction was faster than ETA.
※ NH3 was produced from ETA or N2H4 which removes Oxygen.
• Na
Na’s sensitivity was stronger than NH3 or ETA. So, Na was eluted after NH3 or
ETA.
High Peak position of Na Conc. was overrode on Cs’s conc. 1.0 meq/ℓ(half input
Conc.)
⇒ Cs extrude Na
• Cs
Cs has S-shape breakthrough characteristics like single ion and it was absorbed
on IX resin.
Cs was not affected by other ions, and Its behavior look like single ion solution.
4. Review of Experimental Results (3)
Ion Breakthrough Curve Characteristics
![Page 29: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
28
- ETA was not impurity in system, and should not be removed at deminerlizer (On the contrary it
should be circulated)
- The small Na leakage from new resins was not controlled and excluded at demineralizer exchange
criteria.
- Even impurities by outside influx was suddenly increased, the impurities concentration should be
decreased in proportion to circulating volume as time passes. Impurities, concentration should be
decreased.
Table. The SG blowdown water quality of PWROperation Operation mode
Na criteria
(ppb)
Cl criteria
(ppb)
Startup
operation
reload→ cold standby (mode 6-5) ≤ 100 ≤ 100
hot shutdown (mode 4) ≤ 100 ≤ 100
hot standby (mode 3) ≤ 100 ≤ 100
startup operation (mode 2) ≤ 100 ≤ 100
Reactor
power
operation
reactor power (5~30%) ≤ 100 ≤ 100
reactor power ( 30%) ≤ 20 ≤ 20
4. Review of Experimental Results (4)
The resin replacement criteria of cation
resin
![Page 30: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
29
• Na concentration should be less than 100ppb at maximum or stop operation.
If the limited concentration at the second step is less than Na 100ppb,
the concentration at Na DF 10 should be 10ppb.
• DF 10 of Na Spec value (20ppb) is 2ppb, and Max conc. of Na is 3ppb
at operation over 30% generation. Therefore sum of them is less than 5ppb.
• The water quality level is less than Na concentration(5ppb).
Therefore, improvement of cation resin change criteria is that the Na outlet conc.
is reasonable to be selected less than 5ppb.
• Cl , SO4-2 and Conductivity would be derived from system parameters as below.
◆ The resin exchange criteria of SG blowdown demineralizer
- exchange criteria of mixed bed : [Na, Cl ≥ 5 ppb ]
- reference exchange criteria : [SO4-2 ≥ 5 ppb, C.C ≥ 0.3㎲/㎝ ]
4. Review of Experimental Results (5)
The resin replacement criteria of IX resin
![Page 31: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
30
Table : Ion load for water quality of flow water
Item
IonMax.conc (ppb) M.W (g./mol)
Ion load
( x 10-9 eq/ℓ)
Considered ETA, NH4 not considered ETA, NH4
ETA 5,000 61.08 81.86 NA
NH4+ 500 17.00 29.41 NA
N2H4 50 32.00 1.56 1.56
Na+ 20 23.00 0.87 0.87
total 115.05 3.78
Anion Max organic acid x 1 Max organic acid x 5
Cl- 20 35.50 0.56 0.56
SO4-2 20 96.06 0.42 0.42
SiO2- 100 60.08 1.66 1.66
Acetic acid 20 60.05 0.333 1.67
Glycolic acid 20 76.05 0.263 1.31
Formic acid 20 46.02 0.435 2.17
total 3.67 7.80
4. Review of Experimental Results (6)
The SGBD Ion Exchanger’s cation/anion mixing
ratio
![Page 32: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
31
Table. Calculated Resin Volume with system ion loads
Item
Resin
Ion Load of System
(x10-9 eq/ℓ) Removal
Capacity of
Resin *
(eq /ℓ resin)
Calculated Resin Volume
capacity
(x 10-9 ℓ resin)
ETA
considering
ETA not
considerin
g
ETA
considering
ETA not
considering
Cation 115 3.78 1.8 63.9 6.5
Anio
n
Max organic
acid x 1 3.67 3.67 1.2 3.1 3.1
Max organic
acid x 5 7.80 7.80 1.2 2.1 2.1
◆ SG BD demineralizer’s cation/anion resin mixing ratio
- the ratio of cation and anion resin was 10 : 1 considered ETA load
- the ratio of cation and anion resin was 1 : 3 excluded ETA load
- The Mixing ratio of Resin (margin : ETA elution effects) 3 : 1
4. Review of Experimental Results (7)
The SGBD Ion Exchanger’s cation/anion mixing
ratio
![Page 33: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
32
Satisfaction of PWR FSAR’s Requirements
Saturated IX with ETA Capture the Na and Cs ion
Cs+ > Na+ > ETA+ ≥ NH4+ > H+
Confirm the cation IX Resin Selectivity in ETA solution
No load IX Resin for ETA or NH4
Verify the Cs ion Selectivity of H-, ETA-saturated IX
Satisfaction of EPRI secondary water Guidelines
Confirm the Na ion Selectivity in ETA solution
5. Conclusions (1)
![Page 34: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
33
Establish Spent Resin change Criteria
1Standardization Spent Resin Criteria and Mixing IX Resin
2
Examined Na’s behavior in system
4Obtain ion Selectivity for H-type ion
3
Technical
Effects
5. Conclusions (2)
![Page 35: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
34
Max. removal Capacity of Resin
Reduce works on Radiation area
Reduce Spent IX resin(370t/yr)
Save the Cost(3.3billionWon/total
Solving Problem example with another team
Other
Effects
Min. Low Level Radioactive Wastes
Min. Radiation Exposure
Water quality treatment tech.
Co-works
5. Conclusions (3)
![Page 36: PLTN 3](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051517/55cf97b1550346d033930c1a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
35
Thank you for your attentions !