presentazione di...

8TH MEETING OF THE TASK FORCE ETC

CBC PROGRAMME ITALY-SLOVENIA 2014-2020

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

MAIN RESULTS

Bled, July 16th 2014

Article 5 (Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013

The partners shall be involved by Member States throughout the preparation and implementation of programmes

Article 5 (Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013)

The Cooperation Programme shall also identify the actions taken to involve the partners in the preparation of the Cooperation Programme and the role of those partners in the preparation and implementation of the Cooperation Programme

Article 8 (Commission Delegated Regulation No 240/2014) Code of Conduct

Member States shall involve relevant partners, in accordance with their institutional and legal framework, in the preparation of programmes and provide the actions taken to involve the relevant partners in the preparation of the programmes and their amendments

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Objectives:

Targeting Programme strategy and its interventions towards socio-economic and environmental conditions, developmental gaps and potentials pertinent to the involved territory;

Strengthening the actors’ commitment and ownership;

Providing an opportunity for stakeholders participation in order to give an effective added value to cooperation actions.

Expected results:

To obtain inputs on the selection of the Thematic objectives and Investment Priorities of the Cooperation Programme and their justification;

To understand the existing development needs, the actions to be implemented and the target group to be involved from the stakeholders’ perspective;

To know which is the stakeholders’ expected change.

METHODOLOGY

Definition of the questionnaire format

List of stakeholders to be involved in the consultation process

Publication of the questionnaire on a dedicated web-page and on the Italy-Slovenia 2007-2013 site (www.ita-slo.eu):

http://silo.regione.fvg.it/gquest/registrazione.aspx?cod=ITASLO2014

http://silo.regione.fvg.it/gquestSLO/registrazione.aspx?cod=ITASLO2014-

SLO

Information on the launch of the public consultation via email (more of 900 emails sent to various stakeholders to announce the launch of the consultation)

Collection of comments and statements through online questionnaire

Feedback on the Programme Partners consultation included in the Report on the Logical Framework implementation

Presentation of the stakeholders’ consultation results

METHODOLOGY

http://www.ita-slo.eu/



















http://silo.regione.fvg.it/gquestSLO/registrazione.aspx?cod=ITASLO2014-SLO














964 surveys have been submitted

264 surveys have been completed (27,4% of total submitted)

This resulted in more than 1500 individual comments to be treated.

Number of undeliverable e-mails: 72 (7,5% of total submitted)

RESULTS OF THE ONLINE SURVEY

GENERAL OVERVIEW SUBMITTED UNDELIVERABLE MAIL RECEIVED

SURVEYS ITA SLO Tot ITA SLO Tot ITA SLO Tot

603 361 964 41 31 80 169 95 264

169 surveys have been completed (28% of total submitted)

This resulted in more than 850 individual comments to be treated

Number of undeliverable email: 41 (6,8% of total italian mails)

95 surveys have been completed (26,3% of total submitted)

This resulted in more than 690 individual comments to be treated

Number of undeliverable email: 31 (8,6% of total Slovenian mails)

Slovenian stakeholders Italian stakeholders

RESULTS OF THE ONLINE SURVEY

STAKEHOLDERS IDENTIFICATION

RESPONSES BY COUNTRY

169

95

264

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

ITA SLO Tot

Local P.A. and Research Institutions National P.A. and Research Institutions

Identikit of the Respondents

TYPE OF ORGANIZATION REPLYING TO THE SURVEY

9,1%

8,3%

1,5%

12,1%

25,4%

2,7%

1,5%

9,5%

0,4%

1,5%

6,1%

6,4%

15,5%

National P. A.

Regional P.A. (NUTS II)

Regional P.A. (NUTS III)

Local P.A.

University, , Research Institutions,etc

Training Center

Business support Organizations

Civil Society

ONG, Int. Org.

EGCT

Private sector consultancy

Private Sector

Other

TYPE OF ORGANIZATION REPLYING TO THE SURVEY

Italian Stakeholders who identified them as « Other », defined themselves as following:

Associations; Public Companies; Trade and business Organizations

Slovenian Stakeholders who identified them as « Other », defined themselves as following:

health care facility

Tecno Park/District

AREAS OF ACTIVITY

32,2%

14,8%

1,5%

12,5%

10,6%

14,8%

13,6%

R&D

Small & Medium Enterprises

Low-carbon Economy

Environmental protection

Education, social inclusion, Employment, etc.

P.A. sector

Other

HAVE YOU BEEN INVOLVED IN AN ITALY-SLOVENIA PROGRAMME PROJECT?

YES

50,9 % of Italian stakeholders

74,7 % of Slovenian stakeholders

59,5 % of total stakeholders

NO

49,1 % of Italian stakeholders

25,3 % of Slovenian stakeholders

40,5 % of total stakeholders

THEMATIC CONCENTRATION

OVERVIEW

TERRITORIAL DISTRIBUTION

OT 1 OT 2 0T 3 OT 4 OT 5 OT 6 OT 7 OT 9 OT 11

131

78 111 109

82 117

80 98 78

57

39

51 40 55

73

38

63

35

188

117

162 149

137

190

118

161

113

total

SLO

ITA

High Relevance

OT 1

OT 2

0T 3

OT 4

OT 5

OT 6

OT 7

OT 9

OT 11

24

71

33 33 42 39 57

44 50 30

37

36 32 29

19

28 27

43 54

108

69 65

71

58

85

71

93

TOT SLO ITA

Medium Relevance Low Relevance

TERRITORIAL DISTRIBUTION

OT 1 OT 2 0T 3 OT 4 OT 5 OT 6 OT 7 OT 9 OT 11

14 20 23 27 37

13 32 27

41 8

19 8

23 11

3

29

5

17

22

39

31

50 48

16

61

32

58 TOT

SLO

ITA

TO RANKING

131,2

106,5

121,0 113,9

108,3

133,0

102,4

121,1

101,5

TO 1 TO2 TO3 TO4 TO5 TO6 TO7 TO9 T011

Total score: (NH*wh + NM*wm+NL*wl)/10

NH: total of responses - high relevance NM: total of responses - medium relevance NL: total of responses - low relevance

wh: 6 (weight, high relevance) wM: 3 (weight , medium relevance wL: 1 (weight, low relevance)

THEMATIC CONCENTRATION

Strengthening research, technological development and innovation

Enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises, the agricultural sector (for the EAFRD) and the fisheries and aquaculture sector (for the EMFF)

Protecting the environment and promoting resource efficiency

Sustainable Growth

Smart Growth

Promoting social inclusion and combating poverty

Inclusive Growth

TO 1

TO 3

TO 6

TO 9

IP RANKING

Total score: (NH*wh + NM*wm+NL*wl)/10

NH: total of responses - high relevance NM: total of responses - medium relevance NL: total of responses - low relevance

wh: 6 (weight, high relevance) wM: 3 (weight , medium relevance wL: 1 (weight, low relevance)

124

164

86

54

32 22 22 24

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1a 1b

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

110

70

108

69

90

81

38

53

22

47 51 53

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2a 2b 2c

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

IP OVERVIEW

TO 1 TO 2

124 119

125 135

85 83 79 73

15 19 22 19

40 43 38 37

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

3a 3b 3c 3d

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

134 133 142

93

115 114

54 59

50

66

52 59

34 33 30

52 43 43 42 39 42

53 54 48

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f

High relevance Medium relevance Low relevance No reply

IP OVERVIEW

TO 3

TO 4

108

130

62 51

37

25

57 58

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

5a 5b

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

116 115

139

108 112

124

58

73 77

58

84 78

70

112

26 23 16 20 16 17

40 49 49 51 52

58 53 54

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

IP OVERVIEW

TO 5 – TO 6

66

76

90

101 95

71

63 56

38

50

59 52

45

53 49

68 73 73 72 70

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

7a 7b 7c 7d 7e

High relevance Medium relevance Low relevance No reply

122

100 99 93

112

59

78 75 82

66

33 28 31

27 25

50 58 59 62 61

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

9a 9b 9c 9d 9.ETC*

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

IP OVERVIEW

TO 7

TO 9

IP OVERVIEW

88

73 73

83

44

39

59

69

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

11a 11b

High relevance

Medium relevance

Low relevance

No reply

TO 11

IP ABOUT TO SELECTED

1 b

3 d

6 c

9 a

Promoting business investment in R&I, developing links and synergies between enterprises, research and development centres and the higher education sector, in particular promoting investment in product and service development, technology transfer, social innovation, eco-innovation, public service applications, demand stimulation, networking, clusters and open innovation through smart specialisation, and supporting technological and applied research, pilot lines, early product validation actions, advanced manufacturing capabilities and first production, in particular in key enabling technologies and diffusion of general purpose technologies

Supporting the capacity of SMEs to grow in regional, national and international markets, and to engage in innovation processes;

Conserving, protecting, promoting and developing natural and cultural heritage;

Investing in health and social infrastructure which contributes to national, regional and local development, reducing inequalities in terms of health status, promoting social inclusion through improved access to social, cultural and recreational services and the transition from institutional to community-based services;

STAKEHOLDERS’ COMMENTS

TO 1

R&I is a fundamental factor for development

and growth

Avoid SMEs marginalization and improve their

involvement in research activities

Enforce linkages among R&I actors

Applied research concerning existent productive chains

Concentration on SSS sectors

Share research results inside the cooperation

area

Energy and Environment, Health and biotechnology, Blue research and navigation, Social Innovation,

Infrastructure resilience

SECTORS

Integrated actions for business networks

Technical support to SMEs

Innovation in productive process and

organization

Technology transfer through doctorates and

staff exchanges Co-creation of

innovative products and services

Networks, clusters and platforms

creation/consolidation


TO 2

Foster business competitiveness

Administrative simplification and efficient public services

supply to citizens

Promote easier access to TIC for citizens and

business

E-Services for SMEs E-health and welfare

E-government

Transparency and Open Data

Digital literacy

Promote investments in removing digital

divide infrastructural gap

Better accessibility for population living in

remote areas


TO 3

Improving costs reduction through organizational and productive process

innovation

Promoting innovative and sustainable and market

oriented enterpreunership, Start-ups/Spin-off

SMEs competitiveness and

internationalization

High quality services

Tourism, ICT, Agriculture SECTORS

Enhance cluster policy and the quality of business

networks

Integrated approach to business growth combining

ICT, strategic marketing, human capital

Territorial marketing strategy

Boost productivity of traditional sectors through: ICT based activities, market oriented

strategies, cooperation with dynamic SME and re-start up

processes


TO 4

Exploit growth and employment potentials

linked to Green economy

Decrease emissions level (in particular those due to

trasnports) and reduce the negative impact of pollution on health and quality of life

Foster sustainability through innovative

and ecologic solutions

Develop RES technologies

Transports (in particular maritime ones) and sustainable mobility, tourism, agro-

energy, buildings

SECTORS

Energy savings in public and residential buildings

Integrated strategies involving all relevant

sectors

People awareness campaigns

Accessible urban mobility and facilitate the use of

public transports

Introduce eco-innovative productive

processes

Reasearch and studies concernig renowable

energy production


TO 5

Improve territorial planning, management

and protection

Promote crossborder cooperation and synergies

for common natural resources management

Face the negative impact of climate

change

Upgrade infrastructures resilience

Hydrogeologic, Sisimic, Fires, Coastal and maritime management

Joint strategies and structures for risks

prevention, monitoring and early intervention

systems

Exchange of information

Coordinated planning of actions for climate change mitigation and adaptation,

in particular in tourism, agriculture and buildings

Applied research for natural risks

Risks Assessment, Studies, Analysis to understand

interaction between antropic and

environmental factors

Added Value of Cooperation

Assurance schemes for natural risks

RISKS


TO 6

Protect environment and natural resources to improve

sustainable development

Enhance biodiversity and preservation of future

generation rights

Natural and cultural resources valorization

trough sustainable tourism

Tourism, Energy, Waste and Water management

Joint actions and coordination between italian and slovenian

structures Awareness campaign

saddressed to tourists, students and citizens

Eco-innotations/solutions in the productive processes

(Eco-industrial Parks)


SECTORS

Better kowledge of ecosystems


TO 7

Remove the main bottlenecks in transports and improve people and

freight circulation

Foster competitiveness and accessibility of North

Adriatic logistic platform

Promote sustainable mobility and the reduction of GHG

emissions caused by transports

Better integration of public transports at crossborder level

Logistics and intermodality, Ports and

maritime trasnports, tourists mobility services

New solutions for smart, integrated and sustainable

transport systems

E-navigation services; land-sea interoperability;

traceability

ITS Services and car sharing


Refuelling stations planning for alternative

fuels vehicle

SECTORS

Connections between idustrial districts and

logistic hubs


TO 9

Combating poverty raising caused by economic crisis and promote social equity

Promoting social inclusion of most vulnerable groups and

fighting different kinds of discrimination

Improving better quality and efficiency of social services,

reducing imbalances between two boerders

supply

Health, childcare and elderly care, crosscultural dialogue

Innovative and ICT solutions for health and weel-being

Capitalization of 2007-2013 projects

Integrated or joint services

Networking or better coordination between

social and care structures

SECTORS


TO 11

Cutting the red tape for citizens and business sector

and making government structures closer to peoples

Ensuring PA efficiency in the EU Funds management

Improving capacity building in particular at local level

Better coordination among public authorities, in particular for those

responsible of health sector

Health, maritime planning

Coordination between ETC Programmes and other EU

Funds resources

Technical support expecially for the management of complex projects

SECTORS

MATRIX OF SUGGESTIONS

JUSTIFICATION Need to promote SMEs’

innovation and involvement in research activities

Need to promote traditional sectors

innovation/internationalization and the birth of market oriented firms

and start-ups/spin-off

Need to avoid the loss of biodiversity and

ensure the sustainable use of natural resources

Increased number of people living in poverty risk and existing gaps in

the social services quality and supply

MODALITY/ ACTION

Research oriented to active productive chains and S3

strategy; Actions for business networks; Cooperation

between R&I actors (quadruple helix approach)

High quality services; Integrated strategic vision for business sector and territorial

marketing

Better coordination and integrated planning;

sustainable tourism and eco-innovative solutions in the productive sector

ICT solutions for health and social care;

better coordination between structures;

joint services

SPECIFIC SECTOR

Energy and Environment, Health and biotechnology, Blue

research, Navigation Tourism, ICT, Agriculture

Tourism, Energy, Waste and Water management

Health, childcare and elderly care,

crosscultural dialogue

TO1 TO3 TO6 TO9

DEVELOPMNET NEEDS

DEVELOPMENT NEEDS & ACTIONS

TO1

Development needs Actions

Improvement of the connection between research facilities and production system

Promote innovation clusters

Integration between research centers

Build up synergic projects and sustainable networks between research centers, also equipped in terms of infrastructure (innovation hub)

Push on enterprise networks and clusters Promote cross-border training, information and workshops

Strengthen the skills of human capital Promote technology transfer and good practices exchange

Promote cross-cutting areas, particularly tourism, agricolture, food, biotech, biomed

Promote e-Health technology for prevention and active aging


TO2


Strengthen digital culture and automation processes in enterprises

Support to digital transmission protocols in PA

Promote e-health and e-learning areas Promote research networks integrated with production system

Promote cross-border interoperable digital infrastructure

Support infrastructure for broadband transmission


TO3


Strengthen enterprise network sand clusters Support the creation of clusters of SMEs to attack the international market

Promote the exchange of good practices and enhance information

Promote actions in the fields of green and blue economy (tourism, food processing, agriculture, etc.)

Ensuring access to credit Promote innovative start-up and spin-off and support tech parks


TO4


Promote the production of electricity from renewable sources

Promote pilot projects for renewable energy and biogas solution

Strengthen energy efficiency Actions to support the energy efficiency of buildings

Strengthen the system of ports and railways Strengthen the processes of information and people awareness


TO5


Support the system of data sharing in emergency management and monitoring

Create and strengthen risk mapping

Promote networks for tackling climate change effects

Promote measures to protect the coast

Improve water management Support eco-friendly building

Strengthen the focus on risks prevention, restoring and regenerating coastal and marine zones


TO6


Strengthen the water and waste management

Strengthen networks of collaboration and good practices exchange

Promote linkages between stakeholders and public decision makers

Promote investments aimed at safeguarding the environment and the green economy

Focus onsustainable tourism Support for protected areas


TO7


Strengthen cross-border intermodality Promote integrated investments to ensure intermodality based on railway and maritime transports

Strengthen an integrated logistics system based on rail and ports

Support the conversion from road towards the use of railways and maritime transports

Promote forms of public transport and sustainable mobility

Share the best practices and strengthen cross-border integrated planning


TO9


Strengthen the prevention of youth problems and childcare

Promote social economy networks

Promote social and health care integration, including cross-border action

Promote observatories and reference centers for cross-border health and social care structures

Enhance the employability of disadvantaged people

Support networks of integrated services for social inclusion


TO11


Sustain integrated strategic planning between the two countries

Promote the strengthening of public administration through the creation of networks and training

Promote advanced forms of integration between public and private

Promote good practices exchange between PA

Strengthen Public Administration skills Enhance EGTC

Public procedures simplification Support for access to EU funds

43,7% of answers • A: 35,8% is satisfied of the cooperation at

the institutional level

• B: 21% perceived a modest level of cooperation by the poor efficiency of the administrative system.

• C: 41,6% felt weak cooperation, mainly related to the projects and then not applied to the programme area. Lack of synergy between institutional actors and SMEs.

43% of answers • Almost 95%indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Scientific and technologic parks, Regions.

• Beyond 50%indicated private bodies as: SMEs, clusters, industrial districts, employer’s associations

• Approximately 40% indicated 3th sector actors, in particular NGO’s, voluntary associations, cultural circles of the national communities, social services, tourism promotion structures, foundation. Particular focus on “Rete EEN”.

Situation of Cooperation Perceived Actors/Institutions to be involved

TO1 COOPERATION PERCEIVED & TARGET GROUP

*Cooperation Level A= SATISFACTORY B= MEDIUM C= WEAK

• To identify specific intervention areas and facilitate bureaucratic procedures;

• Strengthening of the synergy between the actors involving all of representatives of the national communities;

• To create an institutional cross-border network in order to share know-how and best practices;

• Creation of a cross-border Observatory, in order to bring the expertise of research Centers representatives of both realities;

• To implement a sustainable development policy in the marine/maritime common area.

TO1 EXPECTED CHANGE

18,6% of answers • A: 23,5% perceived a satisfactory level of

cooperation, strengthened by actions to enhance and replicate, such Trans2Care (University of Trieste);

• B: 27,4% perceived a moderate level cooperation, to be empowered through the development of networks and business cluster;

• C: 49,1% perceived a very weak cooperation. Difficulties to access it. The dialogue should be enlarged and made it more systematic.

28% of answers • A large majority indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Hospitals, Chambers of Commerce, GOLEA ARES (Agenzia regionale per l’edilizia sostenibile), Employment offices, Ministries of transport, Port authorities and maritime administrations;

• Almost 40% indicated private bodies as SMEs, clusters, digital districts,private research centers, IT facilities, employer’s associations;

• Over 50%, indicated other sector actors, in particular civil society organizations, social service centers, cultural associations, patient and medical associations. Particular focus on “Rete EEN” and BSO (Business Sport Organization)




• To increase the investment in infrastructures and digital tools as well as education programs aimed to encouraging the

dissemination of expertise in the field;

• To promote the development of networks and business clusters;

• Sharing, development and transferability of the results achieved from good practices;

• Training in TLC field.

TO2 EXPECTED CHANGE

17,5% of answers • A: 18,75% perceived a strong cooperation

level with strong improvement potential offered by territorial entities (such as R&D excellence Centers as the ELETTRA laboratory);

• B:35,4% perceived a weak level of cooperation, but potentially developable through reliable partners and with the SMEs involvement;

• C:41,6% believed the cooperation ineffective to lack of concentration on the objectives.

• 4,75% is not able to answer

22,2% of answers • Over 50%indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Scientific and technologic parks, Chambers of Commerce, Regions, Hospitals;

• The large majority indicated the necessity to involve private subjects, manly: seafood processing industry, SMEs, employer’s associations, organizations and consortia of industrial development, private banks, financial institutions, industrial cross-border bodies;

• Less than 40% indicated other sector actors, in particular civil society organizations, , patient and medical associations, foundations. Particular focus on “Rete EEN”




• Stronger collaboration between enterprises cluster in programme

area in order to achieve development results, industrialization and commercialization of new product;

• To promote projects involving collaboration between companies of different fields;

• To promote cooperation between agrozootechnical SMEs

• To facilitate bureaucratic procedures;

• Strengthening competitiveness and innovation in the fishing industry and to modernize the port infrastructure

TO3 EXPECTED CHANGE

15,3% of answers • A: 28,5% declared the existence of cross-

border experiences of success, particularly in the environmental field; Focus on NAPA (North Adriatic Port association), constituted by the Italian port authorities of Venice, Trieste and the Koper (SLO) and Rijeka (CRO) ports;

• B: 23,8% perceived a medium level of

cooperation, with possibilities of improvement offered by the involvement of SMEs and employer’s association in order to create a stronger synergy;

• C: 42,8% declared that cooperation in this field does not exist;

• 8,7% is not able to answer; • 0,9% believes cooperation is not a priority in

TO4

19,7% of answers • Almost 99% indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Scientific and technologic parks, Ministries of Transports and Economic development, portual and maritime authorities, rail infrastructure manager;

• Over 50%indicated the necessary to involve private subjects, manly: SMEs, employer’s associations, consortia purpose, companies for council housing , ARES, companies providing energy services;

• Less than 30%indicated other sector actors, in particular civil society organizations, associations. Particular focus on NAPA, and “Rete EEN”.

Situation of Cooperation Perceived

Actors/Institutions to be involved



• To institutionalize the relations of cooperation between all ports in the programme area;

• To develop the support infrastructures, IT and communication networks;

• Training of workers in the field of renewable energy sources and new technologies;

• To promote knowledge and dissemination of best practices.

TO4 EXPECTED CHANGE

14,2% of answers • A:28,2% perceived a dynamic level of

cooperation in the field of environmental risks prevention;

• B:30,7% perceived a satisfactory level of cooperation, but it needs to be improved;

• C:33,3% perceived an inadequate level of cooperation due to lack of coordinate actions;

• 6,7% believes that cooperation is not a priority in

TO5

20,8% of answers • Over 50% of the surveyed indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Arpa FvG, portual authorities, ARES;

• Less than 30% of the surveyed indicated the necessary to involve private subjects, manly: SMEs, employer’s associations, consortia purpose, companies for council housing;

• Less than 50% indicated other sector actors, in particular civil society organizations, Cooperative forestry, management bodies of protected areas, OGS ARSO, Civil Protection, Red Cross;


TO5


COOPERATION PERCEIVED & TARGET GROUP

• To facilitate a collaboration mixed between research centers and companies with a nr. Max. of 3 or 4 units/countries;

• To create permanent networks that can also be used after the deadline’s project;

• To improve the dissemination of best practices.

TO5 EXPECTED CHANGE

17,5% of answers • A: 45,8% perceived a satisfactory level of

cooperation, but it needs to be improved;

• B:22,9%Perceived a medium level of cooperation. It should give continuity and strengthened through exchange of experiences;

• C:25% declared that cooperation in this field does not exist;

• 6,7% believes that cooperation is not a priority in TO6

21,8% of answers • Over 80% indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Scientific and technologic parks, Slovenian Ministry of Enviroinment, portual and maritime authorities, Region FvG, manager of public essential services;

• Almost 50% indicated the necessary to involve private subjects, manly: SMEs, employer’s associations, consortia purpose, companies of industrial developed;

• Less than 40% indicated other sector actors, in particular civil society organizations, associations, Civil Protection.




• To dedicate a specific call ITA-SLO about the enhancement of environmental heritage in the programme area;

• Dissemination of best practices;

• To promote joint initiative aimed to enhance tourism and the rural products

• Promotion of models for the harmonizations in the management of fishing and the protection of biodiversity;

TO6 EXPECTED CHANGE

9,1% of answers • A: 24% perceived a good level of

cooperation.Focus on NAPA (North Adriatic Port association), constituted by the Italian port authorities of Venice, Trieste and the Koper (SLO) and Rijeka (CRO) ports;

• B: 32% satisfaction for the cooperation, but it needs of a joint coordinated policy in the field of logistic and transports;

• C: 32% the cooperation is inadequate; • 12% is not be able to answer.

10,2% of answers • 100% of indicated the necessary

involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Scientific and technologic parks, Ministries of Transports, portual and maritime authorities, manager of railway infrastructures;

• Almost 50% indicated the necessary to involve private subjects, manly: SMEs, employer’s associations, consortia purpose, management of airport companies;

• Less than 30% indicated other sector actors, in particular local operators, third sector subjects, NAPA.




• Creation of eco-sustainable system of public/shared transport;

• Investments aimed to empower railway infrastructures;

• Implementation and dissemination of best practices.

TO7 EXPECTED CHANGE

12% of answers • A:27% perceived a very good level of

cooperation in the social and health fields, thanks to the efficiency of worktables.

• B:42,4% perceived an adequate cooperation level, but it needs of a joint coordinated policy through thematic worktables.

• C:24,2% perceived an inefficient level of cooperation, due to the lack of dialogue.

• 6,4% is not be able to answer

11,6% of answers

• Over 90%of the surveyed indicated the necessary involvement of public bodies as: Universities, research Centers, Ministries of Health, Hospitals, Chambers of Commerce;

• Almost 50% of the surveyed indicated the necessary to involve private subjects, manly: SMEs, employer’s associations, sanitary companies;

• Over 70% indicated other sector actors, in particular local operators, third sector subjects, NGOs, social cooperatives, social and health services, patient and medical associations




• Realization of an Observatory to give continuity to the

actions. • Support women’s entrepreneurship • Supports policy about integration of Youth in the labor

market • To promote social inclusion • Implementation of services for the reintegration of

weak people categories. • To enhance the Sanitary centers excellences • To promote the cross-border use of health facilities.

TO9 EXPECTED CHANGE

10,5% of answers

• A:24,1% perceived a very good level of cooperation, achieved through excellence experiences as cross-border GECT Gorizia-N-Gorica-Vrtojba;

• B: 34,4% perceived an adequate level of cooperation, but it needs of a joint coordinated policy in the programme area;

• C: 24,01% perceived an inadequate level of cooperation, due to inefficient of institutions;

• 17,7% is not able to answer;

4% of answer • Over 90% indicated the necessity to

involve public bodies related to infrastructures and transports, Municipalities, Universities and schools, regional agencies, employment ‘s office, Health institutions, Chambers of Commerce

• Almost 50% indicated the necessity to involve SMEs, large companies in the automotive sector, private research centers in the field of communication, IT and biology

• Less than 30% indicated the necessity to involve 3th sector actors, as social cooperatives




• Dissemination and transferability of good practices;

• Stronger involvement of territorial governance and stakeholders;

• To facilitate bureaucratic procedures;

• Implementation of a common legislation.

TO11 EXPECTED CHANGE

Thank you for your cooperation

presentazione di...

Documents