principal professional learning team february 2011
TRANSCRIPT
The mission of the Parkway School District
is to ensure all students are capable,
curious and confident learners who
understand and respond to the
challenges of an ever-changing world.
Welcome
Listen to understand Mission focused Well-planned agenda Active and respectful participation
Norms for Working Together
Welcome (Bonnie and Desi) Superintendent’s Message (Keith) Staffing/HR Update (Joy)
Instructional Coach, Math Facilitator, RIS (Kathy) Progress Monitoring and Intervention (John
Barrow) Professional Learning Communities (Desi, Liz and
Paul)
Agenda
Job Updates
Reading Intervention Specialist
New domains and criteria are being created and plan will be completed in the Spring.
Library/Media Specialist
New domains and criteria are being created and plan will be completed by late February.
Article - Second Order Change in the Library (on the Action Team website)
Instructional Coach and Math FacilitatorTimeline
Instructional Coach
Post Feb. 13th Post Close Wed., Feb. 23 Paper Screening – Completed
by Friday, Feb. 25th Small Panel Interview –
Monday, Feb. 27th (7:00 AM - ?)
Principal Interview Process – Wednesday, Feb.29th (TBD)
Math Facilitator
Post Feb. 13th Post Close Feb. Wed., Feb. 23rd
Paper Screening – Completed by Friday, Feb. 25th
Small Panel Interview – Tuesday, Feb. 28th (7:00 AM)
Principal Interview Process (Select a principal/ap from building to – Thursday, March 1st (TBD))
Instructional Coach and Math Facilitator
Instructional Coach
Commitments (Yellow) Job Description (Yellow) Domains and Criteria
(online) Interview Questions and
Look Fors (in progress)
Math Facilitator
Commitments (Purple) Job Description (Purple) Domains and Criteria (in
progress) Interview Questions and
Look Fors (in progress)
Table Facilitator – High School Principal Move the discussion Keep Time Select a Recorder (Take notes on the note taking guide)
Read the Documents (5 Minutes) Check Mark = Statements you support Exclamation Point= Statements you love Question Mark = Statements that raise a question for you
Discussion (5 - 10 Minutes) Whip around questions Whip around suggestions Summary
Role of district personnel in supporting the Instructional Coach Model
Role of building personnel in supporting the instructional Coach Model
Instructional Coach CommitmentsGoal: Create a common understanding of the role of the instructional
coach at the school and district level
Table Facilitator – High School Principal Move the discussion Keep Time Select a Recorder (Take notes on the note taking guide)
Read the Document (5 Minutes) Check Mark = Statements you support Exclamation Point= Statements you love Question Mark = Statements that raise a question for you
Discussion (5 – 10 Minutes) Whip around questions Whip around suggestions Summary
Role of district personnel in supporting the Math Facilitator Model Role of building personnel in supporting the Math Facilitator
Model
Math Facilitator CommitmentsGoal: Create a common understanding of the role of the math
facilitator at the school and district level
Find a partner at your table Individually read Pyramid Response to Intervention
chapter excerpt from beginning and stop at the top of Page 63 before “Timely”
When both partners are finished, pause and “Say something” to each other (statements should be fairly brief and succinct)
Individually finish reading from “Timely” through “Systematic” stopping on page 67 before “Traditional Responses…”
Repeat “Say something” with partner
Learning CPR: Say Something
Progress Monitoring and Intervention Definition
Parkway Progress Monitoring and Intervention is the systemic practice of providing high quality instruction and interventions matched to student need, monitoring progress frequently to make decisions about changes in instruction or goals and applying student response data to important educational decisions. Our desired objective is to support Progress Monitoring and Intervention practices district-wide as applied to decisions in general, supplemental and special education, creating a well-integrated system of instruction/intervention guided by student outcome data.
(Adapted from NASDSE 2008)
Perceptions of alternative for disability identification (special education roots)
Represents a set of critical principles and elements as a prevention-intervention framework
Not a program, but systems change Has been developed and popularized in education
with a strong “Behavioral” philosophy Important that we own it
Why PMI and Not RtI?
PMI is how Parkway is operationalizing and implementing RtI conceptsTurn to a neighbor and discuss:
Does the rationale for PMI make sense?
Are there stronger reasons why we should be calling our work RtI?
Does This Help?
What’s it look like?
Characteristics of PMI implementedA.Frequent data collection on students in critical
areasB.Early identification of students at riskC.Early intervention D.Interventions evaluated and modified (if necessary)
frequentlyE.Tiered levels of service deliveryF. All decisions made with or verified by data
FRAMEWORK FOR
PROGRESS MONITORING
& INTERVENTION
IDENTIFY
RESPONDMONITOR
Screening What is the problem?
DiagnosticWhy is it happening?
EvaluationIs it working?
End Goal
InterventionWhat will we do about it?
PROBLEM SOLVING
IDENTIFY
RESPONDMONITOR
Screening What is the problem?
DiagnosticWhy is it happening?
EvaluationIs it working?
End Goal
InterventionWhat will we do about it?
Problem Solving: What Is The Problem?
Identify and Prioritize Problems(s) Various types of data from multiple sources Longitudinal Patterns and Trends (including areas of strength) Current Performance compared to standard or expectation
Write a Problem Statement Problem identified in measureable, observable terms Identify current state and the desired state Problem statement is student outcome or student result
based
Root Cause Evaluation of previous practices Related to an area that can be impacted Based on data, multiple hypotheses are considered Root Cause selected based on best fit with evidence
Quality Goal Directly connected to the problem statement Meets SMART criteria Indicators and measures are identified
Problem Solving: Why Is It Happening?
Action Plan Identify potential evidence based action steps Prioritize action steps connected to root cause Action steps are feasible, focused and coordinated Rate of progress established (criteria for success) Plan for monitoring fidelity of implementation Specific people have responsibility for
implementation, support and monitoring
Problem Solving: What Will We Do About It?
Monitor Ongoing formative data use to monitor
progress toward goal Use agreed upon rate of progress to guide
decision making Monitoring fidelity of action steps is formative
and ongoing Cycle repeats for additional problem solving
and continuous improvement
Problem Solving: Is It Working?
INSTRUCTION/INTERVENTION
IDENTIFY
RESPONDMONITOR
Screening What is the problem?
EvaluationIs it working?
End Goal
InterventionWhat will we do about it?
DATA/ASSESSMENT
IDENTIFY
RESPONDMONITOR
Screening What is the problem?
DiagnosticWhy is it happening?
EvaluationIs it working?
End Goal
InterventionWhat will we do about it?
Conducted with everyone within a population
Conducted to identify those at-risk of failure, emotional/behavioral difficulties, or health issues
Goal is to identify difficulties before: Overt problems/symptoms are manifested The difficulties become significant and lead
to impairment
Assessment: Screening
Emphasis on early identification to prevent difficulties from further development or escalation Two ways of looking at EARLY identification
Early as in an “early” age (e.g., pre-k) Early as in the “early” development of difficulty
Ongoing-Multiple Times This provides a connection to progress
monitoring Multiple measures/data points are more reliable
Assessment: Screening
To identify area of intervention (specific needs)
Provided only to those students who were identified during Screening or other data
Sufficient amount of information to find instructional level and/or strengths and weaknesses in performance
Should lead to intervention/support selection
Assessment: Diagnostic
Determine whether instruction/intervention is having sufficient impact so that established goals will be reached
Frequency increases with level of intensity of support
Needs to be paired with monitoring implementation
Assessment: Monitoring
GOALS, FEEDBACK
& GRAPHING IDENTIFY
RESPONDMONITOR
Screening What is the problem?
DiagnosticWhy is it happening?
EvaluationIs it working?
End Goal
InterventionWhat will we do about it?
Goals developed and used within the context of systematic problem solving can guide our work
Feedback regarding progress toward goal informs decision making and increases motivation
Graphing, or visual representation of progress toward goal, is critical for collaborative process and as a method to deliver clear and more objective feedback
Goals, Feedback & Graphing
Turn to table partner and discuss: Questions or concerns about PMI framework Areas of connection to other initiatives Ways we can better integrate this work at
district and school levels
Process and Debrief
Budget- Resource Reduction Need to think differently about allocating
resources (Mission and Budget related) Urgent work to develop and implement a
district-level process for allocating district intervention resources (Literacy and Math supports) based on need
Consistent with PMI, we require a district-level collaborative team to do this work and provide ongoing monitoring and problem solving (Building-District Partnership will be critical)
Immediate Need