procure defense procurement and acquisition policy … training presentations... · procure defense...

16
DoD’s and FFATA, DATA Act, and the Integrated Award Environment (IAE) PROCURE-TO-PAY DEFENSE PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION POLICY TRAINING SYMPOSIUM May 30 – June 1, 2017 Hyatt Regency Orlando FL 1 Presented by: J. Lisa Romney, CPCM Procurement Analyst DPAP-PDI

Upload: dangcong

Post on 25-May-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

DoD’s and FFATA, DATA Act, and the Integrated Award Environment (IAE)

PROCURE-TO-PAY DEFENSE PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION POLICY

TRAINING SYMPOSIUM

May 30 – June 1, 2017 ● Hyatt Regency Orlando FL 1

Presented by: J. Lisa Romney, CPCM Procurement Analyst DPAP-PDI

FFATA • Federal Funding Accountability & Transparency Act (FFATA) of 2006

set specific reporting requirements for federal awards (e.g., contracts, grants, loans) at the prime and sub-tier levels – OMB issued policy for reporting the required data based on existing

requirements for FAADS (grants) and FPDS (contracts) – USASpending.gov established to be the central display

• FFATA amended in 2008 to require additional elements be reported regarding executive compensation – Collected via System for Award Management registrations

• Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) developed to collect subaward information

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 2

Current USASpending

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 3

What Happened Next • Recovery Act of 2009 used the data collected by FFATA as a baseline and

established additional reporting requirements to track the Act’s appropriations – Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RATB) put in place to provide

transparency of Recovery money and root out fraud and mismanagement of the funds • Government Accountability and Transparency Board (GATB) established in 2011 to

follow RATB and provide strategic direction for enhancing the transparency of Federal spending

• The Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) amended FFATA in 2012 – Department of Treasury identified as the lead organization – Established additional financial reporting requirements – Established requirement for pilots to reduce the reporting burden on award recipients

• GATB served as initial governance group to assist DATA act implementation – Recommended establishing a standard unique award identifier – Chartered HHS/DoD to review contracts / grants data for standardization opportunities – Became the basis for DATA Act specifications for procurement and grants data elements

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 4

Resulting Contracting Community Actions Action Status

Ensure uniqueness and standardization of award numbers

Implemented FAR case 2012-023; new PIID rules required by October 1, 2017

Ensure procurement offices are uniquely identified

Implemented via FAR case 2012-023; all federal contracting offices now identified using Activity Address Codes (AACs) - Funding offices now also use AACs - Grants community now also implementing AACs

Establish standards for use of contract line items (CLINs)

Implemented FAR case 2013-014; transition to CLINs by October 1, 2019

Clarify industry hierarchy for reporting

Implemented FAR case 2012-024; now capture owners of contractors using CAGE codes

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 5

DATA Act Implementation • Treasury issued specifications for reporting April 29, 2016; seven files in total

– A – Appropriations Accounts; DoD provides via DDRS – B – Obligations & Outlays by Object Class & Program Activity; DoD provides via DDRS – C – Award Financial Data (Obligations & Outlays); DoD plans to use Universe of Transactions – D1 – Contract data; DoD provides via reporting to FPDS, which provides daily file – D2 – Grants data; DoD provides data in DAADS, which twice a month – E – Executive Compensation – fed by registrant reporting to SAM – F – Subawards – fed by prime reporting to FSRS

• Federal Agencies required to certify the first set of files (for Q2FY17 data) in April – DoD Senior Accountable Official certified for all but file C; plan for file C in April 2018 – DoD IG has initiated initial review of submission

• DoD continues to participate in federal DATA Act data standardization efforts • What you can do:

– Continue to report contracts and grants data in a timely fashion – Continue your validation and verification efforts – Help provide data from contract files for IG review when requested

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 6

BETA of Planned New USASpending

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 7

BETA USASpending

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 8

BETA USASpending

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 9

BETA USASpending

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 10

BETA USASpending

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 11

DATA Act: Central FAR Reporting Pilot • Goal: standardize reporting processes and reduce burden • Activity: Testing future SAM capability where contractors

can centrally report FAR required information and COs can easily access

• Pilot is currently available for weekly payroll reporting for construction contracts

• More information available at https://community.max.gov/x/QYztR

• You can also email [email protected]

Integrated Award Environment (IAE) • DoD has used IAE capabilities since its start in 2001

– Several of the applications began as DoD systems • IAE has successfully implemented authoritative source

data systems across the federal government for vendor and contract/grants-related data

• Starting this year – move to the modernized SAM environment

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 13

How to Prepare for the New Environment

• Attend IAE breakout sessions • Participate in testing • Start thinking about how you will organize in

terms of roles • Establish lead super users – will need to

become fluent across capabilities 2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 14

2017 Procure-to-Pay Training Symposium 15

Questions?

PROCURE PAY TO

TRAINING SYMPOSIUM

May 30 – June 1, 2017 ● Hyatt Regency Orlando FL

DEFENSE PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION POLICY

16