product wrap comps

19
Snack Pack Tray •14% reduction in film •Potential corrugate reduction •More attractive appearance

Upload: kputnam

Post on 21-Aug-2015

187 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Product Wrap Comps

Snack Pack Tray

• 14% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction• More

attractive appearance

Page 2: Product Wrap Comps

Diefold wrap on granola bar

Reduce • film use, • shelf space

requirement• corrugate size,• transport costs

Page 3: Product Wrap Comps

Gum: Flow vs. Overwrap

• 25% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction•More

attractive appearance

Page 4: Product Wrap Comps

Ugly wasteful shrink wrap

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 5: Product Wrap Comps

Shrink vs Overwrap

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 6: Product Wrap Comps

Cookie snack pack – flow vs. overwrap

• 23.5% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction•More

attractive appearance

Page 7: Product Wrap Comps

Larger ProductFlow vs. Overwrap

Reduce film use by 18%

Use printed registered film

Page 8: Product Wrap Comps

Wipes – Flow vs. Overwrap

Reduce film use by 29%

Use printed registered

film

Page 9: Product Wrap Comps

Tea box –shrink vs. Overwrap

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 10: Product Wrap Comps

Snack pack tray

Reduce film use by 12%Potential corrugate reductionMore attractive package

Page 11: Product Wrap Comps

Cereal Pack BundleShrink Vs. Overwrap

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 12: Product Wrap Comps

Tissue BundleShrink vs. Overwrap

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 13: Product Wrap Comps

Ugly wasteful shrink wrap bundle

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 14: Product Wrap Comps

Cereal protectionShrink vs. Overwrap

• Reduce film use by 20% - no film wasted• Reduce energy

use from 60 amp to 30 amp• Improve

appearance

Page 15: Product Wrap Comps

Snack trayflow vs. overwrap

• 18.5% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction•More

attractive appearance

Page 16: Product Wrap Comps

Trayed candy flow vs. overwrap

• 21% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction•More

attractive appearance

Page 17: Product Wrap Comps

Gum bundleflow vs. ovewrap

• 50% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction•More

attractive appearance

Page 18: Product Wrap Comps

Wafer Snack Pack flow vs. overwrap

• 18.5% reduction in film• Potential

corrugate reduction•More

attractive appearance

Page 19: Product Wrap Comps

How one company shares info on disposing of packaging waste with

consumers