rbv research protocol october 2009

1
RBV research protocol October 2009 A-Team brainstorm ing Generalities about firm and industry Team interpre tation B-Interview #1 4 questions Recorded and hand-written notes C- Transcription In extenso transcription of interview into electronic file (Word.doc) (one student) D-Interpretation Interpretation of material Answers to questions At least two different team members work separately Interpreta tion #1 for interview i Interpreta tion #2 E-Comparison Comparison between two interpretations Discussion and choice Team interpretation F-Validation Validation of team interpretation by interviewee and correction Final RBV Final RBV report report H-Reflection (optional) Team own reflection, beyond perception of interviewee (assumptions, contradictions, missing material) G-Multi- interview analysis Comparison of interviewees for similarities, contradictions, approaches, levels, and assumptions (if relevant) I-Research integration Integration of reports Comparison Selection of sample of firms and interview of validation/extension Professo r Manager Students Difference s inter- interpreta tions Transcript s of interviews Validation by interviewe es Interviewees’ opinion about the questions Inter- interviewees comparison Team’s reflection

Upload: cameron-bullock

Post on 30-Dec-2015

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

RBV research protocol October 2009. Manager. A-Team brainstorming Generalities about firm and industry. I-Research integration Integration of reports Comparison Selection of sample of firms and interview of validation/extension. Professor. B-Interview #1 4 questions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RBV research protocol  October 2009

RBV research protocol October 2009

A-Team brainstormingGeneralities about firm and industry

Team interpretation

B-Interview #14 questions

Recorded and hand-written notes

C-TranscriptionIn extenso transcription of interview into electronic file (Word.doc) (one student)

D-InterpretationInterpretation of materialAnswers to questionsAt least two different team members work separately

Interpretation #1 for interview i

Interpretation #2 for interview i

E-ComparisonComparison between two interpretationsDiscussion and choiceTeam interpretation

F-ValidationValidation of team interpretation by interviewee and correction

Final Final RBV RBV reportreport

H-Reflection (optional)Team own reflection, beyond perception of interviewee (assumptions, contradictions, missing material)

G-Multi-interview analysisComparison of interviewees for similarities, contradictions, approaches, levels, and assumptions (if relevant)

I-Research integrationIntegration of reportsComparisonSelection of sample of firms and interview of validation/extension

Professor

Manager

Students

Differences inter-interpretations

Transcripts of interviews

Validation by interviewees

Interviewees’ opinion about the questionsInter-interviewees comparison

Team’s reflection