regional transportation plan

25
Regional Transportation Plan First Draft Hybrid Scenario

Upload: pancho

Post on 19-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Regional Transportation Plan. First Draft Hybrid Scenario. Valley Metro Comments. The Regional Transit Study Documented large unmet transit needs. Modeling may understate ridership for LRT due to coding. Scenario C is aggressive – reducing the network will improve performance. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Regional Transportation Plan

Regional Transportation Plan

First Draft Hybrid Scenario

Page 2: Regional Transportation Plan

Valley Metro Comments The Regional Transit Study

Documented large unmet transit needs.

Modeling may understate ridership for LRT due to coding.

Scenario C is aggressive – reducing the network will improve performance.

Need to include supporting infrastructure in coding (park & ride, local bus, etc.)

Page 3: Regional Transportation Plan

ADOT Comments Construct South Mtn as soon as possible. Construct L303 as an ultimate freeway, with

interim roadway in the near term. ROW preservation and interim construction of

L303 to Riggs Rd. Support I-10 Reliever and Williams Gateway

Parkway with consideration for staging with full ROW preservation.

Support L303: New River spur for staged construction with full ROW preservation.

Page 4: Regional Transportation Plan

ADOT Comments (cont’d) Major reconstruction to SR51 from I-10 to

Glendale required if adding capacity. Funding for I-17 from I-10 to Dunlap inadequate.

Funding for SR 74 access control and widening to 4-lane divided.

Support regional bus, express and LRT funding at about $4.0 billion.

Support arterial funding for regional connectivity. Fund Grand Avenue from the Arterial Streets

category.

Page 5: Regional Transportation Plan

Support Q of L projects such as “quiet” pavements, noise walls and landscaping.

Need to address additional maintenance funding.

Focus sales tax on expansion of the regional system and new corridors. Focus ADOT funding on other freeways/highways.

ADOT Comments (cont’d)

Page 6: Regional Transportation Plan

Maricopa County Comments Only fund capital from ½ cent tax Encourage innovative approaches such

as tolled HOT / HOV lanes East-West mobility needs from L101 to

L303 Extend SR 74 to connect to proposed

Canamex Consider 5 cent gas tax increase and

index to inflation for maintenance

Page 7: Regional Transportation Plan

Maricopa County Comments (continued) Fund specific arterial improvements

and only on the County’s Primary System

No sales tax for arterial maintenance Fund BRT and express bus capital, no

O&M No LRT funding Other regional programs funded 50/50.

Page 8: Regional Transportation Plan

½ CentSales TaxExtension

$9.0 BillionSales Tax

A DO T15% Funds

$0.8 Billion

- Legislated- Board Policy

Gas Tax

A DO TD iscretionary

Funds

$4.5 B illion

- Federal- State

Gas Tax

Phoenix/R PTA

Federal Sub-allocated5307 Funds

$0.8 B illion

Phoenix/R PTA

Federal D iscretionary5309 Funds

$1.3 Billion

M AG FederalSub-allocated

(STP)

Surface Transportation

Funds

$0.4 B illion

Federal

(C M AQ)

C ongestionM itigationA ir Quality

Funds

$0.8 B illion

Major Regional Revenue Sources (2006-2025)*

M A R IC O PAA SSO C IATIO N o f

G O VER N M EN TS

Controlled Access State H ighways

State H ighway Im provem ents

Bus - Capital

Light Rail - CapitalBus - Capita l

Streets and H ighwaysTransit - Capita l

Air Quality and Congestion Relief ProjectsTransit - Capita l

HighwaysArteria l StreetsTransit

$ 17.6 b illio n

Page 9: Regional Transportation Plan

Insert Allocation Concept Here, Part I

Funding by Source and Mode

Total Funding by Mode

ModeProgram

Area 1/2 CentADOT Funds

FTA (5307)

FTA (5309)

MAG-CMAQ

MAG-STP

Total Regional Funding

Freeways Capital 4,447 3,688 0 0 149 0 8,284Operations 354 0 0 0 0 0 354Total 4,801 3,688 0 0 149 0 8,638

Streets Capital 864 0 0 0 50 322 1,236

Buses Capital 201 0 805 0 0 0 1,006Operations 1,095 0 0 0 0 0 1,095Total 1,296 0 805 0 0 0 2,100

LRT Capital 984 0 0 1,300 197 0 2,481

Other Transit Capital 13 0 46 0 0 0 59Operations 342 0 0 0 0 0 342Total 355 0 46 0 0 0 401

Planning Programs 26 0 0 0 0 0 26Bicycle/Ped Capital 0 0 0 0 132 0 132Air Quality Programs 0 0 0 0 113 0 113Total Funding Capital 6,509 3,688 851 1,300 528 322 13,198

Operations 1,817 0 0 0 113 0 1,931Total 8,326 3,688 851 1,300 641 322 15,129

Page 10: Regional Transportation Plan

Insert Allocation Concept Here, Part II

Percent Funding by Mode

ModeProgram

Area 1/2 CentADOT Funds

FTA (5307)

FTA (5309)

MAG-CMAQ

MAG-STP

Total Regional Funding

Freeways Capital 53.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.2% 0.0% 54.8%Operations 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3%Total 57.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.2% 0.0% 57.1%

Streets Capital 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.8% 100.0% 8.2%

Buses Capital 2.4% 0.0% 94.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6%Operations 13.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.2%Total 15.6% 0.0% 94.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 13.9%

LRT Capital 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 30.7% 0.0% 16.4%

Other Transit Capital 0.2% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%Operations 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3%Total 4.3% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7%

Planning Programs 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%Bicycle/Ped Capital 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.6% 0.0% 0.9%Air Quality Programs 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.7% 0.0% 0.7%Total Funding Capital 78.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82.3% 100.0% 87.2%

Operations 21.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.7% 0.0% 12.8%Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 11: Regional Transportation Plan

Guidance for Hybrid Changes Fiscally balance the plan. Reflect different needs in sub-

regions. Focus on regionally significant

projects. Incorporate local match for

regional bus O&M. Refine revenues and costs

Page 12: Regional Transportation Plan
Page 13: Regional Transportation Plan

Freeway / Highway Changes Lanes configuration and costs for

widening confirmed with ADOT. Grand Ave increased by $20 mil.

Total investment = $231 million I-10 Reliever moved to interim

Page 14: Regional Transportation Plan

I-17 Investments I-10 (east) to I-10 (west)$ 30 mil I-10 (west) to L101 $557

mil L101 to New River $282

milTotal Investment $869

mil

Page 15: Regional Transportation Plan

I-10 Investments I-10 West $ 336

mil I-10 Central $ 500 mil I-10 East (south) $ 138 mil

Total Investment $ 974 mil

Page 16: Regional Transportation Plan

Freeway/Highway Comments More funding for I-17 SR 51 improvements needed SR 74 – access control and widening Funding for neighborhood mitigation:

Walls Rubberized asphalt on balance of system

Show routes for future development. Look at I-10 Reliever options.

Page 17: Regional Transportation Plan

I-10 Reliever Corridor

Section Length (miles)

ROW Cost

Interim Construction

Cost

Total Interim

Cost (with cont.)

Total Freeway

Cost (with cont.)

South Mountain to L303 15 40 260 360 600L303 to SR85 12 35 160 234 396

Total 27 75 420 594 996

Cost Summary for I-10 Reliever Corridor(millions of 2002 dollars)

Planning cost estimates based on L303 Corridor Study: MC 85 to Riggs Rd., June 11, 2003

Page 18: Regional Transportation Plan
Page 19: Regional Transportation Plan

Arterial Street Changes Costs checked and updated Additions:

L101 Frontage Roads: Princess Dr. to Scottsdale Rd: $25 mil.

15 Intersection improvements to improve regional traffic flow in Chandler and Gilbert.

Deletions: 99th ave connector ($30 mil) Sun Valley Extension to Grand Ave. ($130 mil) Jomax Rd: L303 to Sun Valley Extension ($228 mil) Riggs Rd: Gilbert Rd to Meridian. ($54 mil)

Page 20: Regional Transportation Plan
Page 21: Regional Transportation Plan
Page 22: Regional Transportation Plan
Page 23: Regional Transportation Plan
Page 24: Regional Transportation Plan

Next Steps Refine the fiscally balanced hybrid plan. Present revised plan at July 16th TPC

workshop. Possible TPC acceptance of the revised

hybrid to submit to agencies and public for comments.

Modeling of hybrid. Plan refinements based on modeling and

comments. September adoption for AQ conformity

Page 25: Regional Transportation Plan

For more informationEric AndersonTransportation [email protected]