reporting of i&c status (ukraine)
DESCRIPTION
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY Technical Committee Meeting of Technical Working Group on Nuclear Power Plant Control and Instrumentation 20 - 22 May 2009, Vienna, Austria. REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE). WWR 2×1000 WWR 2×440. RIVNE NPP. WWR 2×1000. KHMELNITSKY NPP. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY Technical Committee Meeting of
Technical Working Group on Nuclear Power Plant Control and Instrumentation 20 - 22 May 2009, Vienna, Austria
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Prof. Mikhail YastrebenetskyUkrainian State Scientific Technical Center on Nuclear and Radiation Safety
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
Contents
1. Common news2. Modernization during 2007-20093. Operating experience4. Regulatory activity5. Recommendation to IAEA
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
RIVNE NPP
ZAPORIZHA NPP
KHMELNITSKY NPP
WWR 2×1000
WWR 6×1000
WWR 2×1000 WWR 2×440
SOUTH-UKRAINE NPPWWR 3×1000
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
1 Common news
•There are in Ukraine:-4 NPP’s;
- 13 units WWER-1000;- 2 units WWER-440.
•The youngest units – Rovno 4 and Khmelnitskiy 2 – started in 2004.The age of the oldest units (Rovno 1, Rovno 2, South Ukraine 1) –
28-29 years. Design life of these units – 30 years. The set of actions (including I&C) for life extension are fulfilling now.
Decreasing of electricity production during January-March 2009 compared with January-March 2008:
-Common – 13,7%-NPP – 13,6%
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
1 Common news
•According government plans, 2 units will be intended for commissioning to 2015. The site was determined - Khmelnitskiy 3 and 4.
Type of units – WWER-1000, project B392B (analog – Balakovskaja NPP-5 – Russia). Manufacturer of reactor – Russia. Manufacturer of turbine and generator – Ukraine.
Designers and manufacturers of I&C systems – Ukrainian companies.
Main designer of I&C – KHIKA and “LvovOrgres”.The main problem – the assurance of unity of different systems
because designers of different systems inside of Ukraine had different element base, difference of software, etc.
Conception of I&C systems for these units will be ended in 2009.
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
2 New systems for Ukrainian NPP
– 2007–2009
Name of system Developer RNPP SUNPP KhNPP ZNPP
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6Reactor protection system RADIY
Reactor power regulation and limitation system
RADIY KHARTRON-ARKOS
Control rod actuation system
ŠKODA IMPULS
Neutron flux monitoring system IMPULS
Engineering safety features actuation system
RADIY
SPDS WESTINGHOUSE, WESTRON
Refueling machine control system
GANZ, EWIG DIAKONT, RADIY
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
2 Implementation of Ukrainian I&C systems for foreign NPP
Ukrainian company
Name of system Name of NPP Country
Radiy Engineering safety feature actuation system
Kozloduy NPP2008 – unit 6 system 22009- unit 5 system2,unit 6 systems1,32010-unit 5 systems 1,3
Bulgaria
Westron System of diesel-generator control
Armenian NPPUnit 2
Armenia
Feedwater control system
Kharkov Shevchenko plant
Automatic turbine regulators Balakovo NPP-3, 4Kalinin NPP-1, 2
Russia
ASUT-240 Control systems for turbine (regulators, technological protection, monitoring and diagnostic) and generator
Kaiga 3, 4 India
RAPP 5, 6
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
3 Operating experience
Operating reliability of I&C systems, designed by “Radiy” company
Name of system Reactor protection systemsReactor power and limitation control
systems
Engineering safety features actuation
systemssystems sets channels systems channels systems channels
Number 10 20 60 6 18 7 22Operating time, h 318000 492000 1476000 124000 372000 85000 236000
Number of failures 0 0 9 0 2 0 3
Estimation of failures intensity,
Е‑06
low confidence
bound– – 10,6 – 19,2 – 32,8
point 0 0 6,1 0 5,37 0 12,7high
confidence bound
– – 3,17 – 1,08 – 3,45
There weren’t any failures of systems or sets as a whole. Comparison of all operating measures with design measures and requirements measures
in specification was fulfilled for channels. Operating measures are close to design measures (e.g. design failure intensity for channel of reactor protection system is 11.6E-06, point estimation is 6.1E-06). All measures for systems satisfy the specification requirements.
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
3 Operating experience
Reliability of FPGA• Different types of FPGA – manufacturer “Altera”
(USA)• Common number of FPGA in reactor protection
systems, reactor power control systems and ESFAS is 11000
• FPGA had not failures for operating time during the observation.
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
Analysis of violations due to I&C
• Level of violations according INES- 1, 0, out of scale• Intensity of violation decreased in function of time ( for
violations due to I&C and due to technological equipment too)
• Important reason of violations- events outside of I&C (ventilation system, EMC, etc)
• Measures how modernization improved safety• Influence of SW
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
3 Operating experience
Reactor power control and
limitation systems (designer – Radiy)
Reactor protection systems
(designer – Radiy)
Control rod systems(designer –
Skoda-Controls)
Before moder-nization
After moder-nization
Before moder-nization
After moder-nization
Before moder-nization
After moder-nization
Operating time, years 140 32 135 37 105 67
Number of violations 2 – 4 – 16 5
Violations intensity, 1/year 0,014 0 0,029 0 0,15 0,074
Unit downtime, h 0 – 55,39 0 38,15 0Underproduction
of energy, 106 kWh
3,5 – 55,3 0 47,907 16
Influence of I&C systems modernization to NPP safety
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
3. Analysis of operating data about NPP violations due to the I&C systems
Comparison of software influence to NPP violations because digital systems
Ukraine USA B.Geddes and R.Torok
2 out of 13 (1st generation),0 out of 20 (2nd generation) 4 out of 49 (1E systems)
Agreement with B.Geddes, R.TorokProtection against the software failures is already at a “reasonable assurance level”
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
4 Regulatory activity
Common Principles of NPP
Safety
Regulations of NPP Reactors Nuclear Safety
Safety Requirements to NPP Digital I&C Systems
(Revision 1)
IEC
IEC 1226
IEC 62340
IEC 60880
IEC 62138
IEC 60987
IAEA
NS-R-1
NS-G-1.3
NS-G-1.1NP 306.5.02/ХХХ-2009
NP 306.2.141 NP 306.2.145
Ukrainian Regulations
Regulations with Requirements to NPP I&C
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
4 Regulatory activity (2)Requirements on Nuclear and Radiation Safety to digital safety important Instrumentation and
Control SystemsNP 306.5.02/XXX-20091. Common positions2. Main terms and definitions3. Classification4. Functional requirements-common positions-safety control systems-safety related systems-control rooms5. Requirements to dependability of functions-protections after CCF-single failure criteria-redundancy-diversity-reliability measures-diagnostic-protection after unauthorized access-protection after personnel error
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
4 Regulatory activity (3)
6. Requirements to resistance of functions-environment-mechanical influence-electrical supply-EMC7. Requirements to quality of functions-accuracy-MMI-response speed8. Requirements to independence of functions9. Requirements to software and hardware10. Requirements to design11. Requirements to confirmation of compliance
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
4 Regulatory activity (4)
Methods of Assessment of NPP I&C Compliance with
Safety Requirements
Requirements of Order and State of the Actions for
Safety Important NPP I&C Life Extension
Methods of Expert Review of NPP I&C, based on FPGA
(Revision 0)
NP 306.2.141 NP 306.5.02/2-068
Regulations with methods related to NPP I&C
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
Knowledge base for expert activity
• -International (IAEA, IEC,ISO) and Ukrainian standards
• Requirements to I&C (Comparison)• Expert reviews • Documentations of new systems• Methodics• Text (or list) of books and articles
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
5 Recommendation to IAEA (1)
I) TECDOC. Review (comparison and analysis) of WWER I&C systems (Russia, Ukraine, Hungary, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, etc.)(similar IAEA Technical Report N387, part 5 “Modern I&C for NPP: Guidebook”)The base of this chapter from Ukrainian side may be the new book “NPP Safety: Reactor Control Systems” (in Russian – “SUZ”), Kiev, 2009 (in publisher house now)
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
5 Recommendation to IAEA (2)
The content of this book:1. NPP with WWER2. Common information about reactor control systems (RCS)3. Type project and modernization of RCS4. Standard base5. Classification6. Common requirements7. Peripheral equipment8. Neutron flux monitoring systems9. Protection systems10. Power control and limitation regulators11. Control rod actuation systems12. Some results of operationAttachments1. Classified list of standards2. FPGA
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
5 Recommendation to IAEA (3)
II) Updating of NS-G-1.3, NS-G-1.1
III) I&C Roadmap in Support of Reactors III+IV generations
IV) Collection, summarizing and analysis of information about NPP safety violations because I&C failures (independent of COMPSIS, not only digital systems) - TECDOC or coordinated research program
Y) Knowledge base related to I&C
REPORTING OF I&C STATUS (UKRAINE)
Mikhail Yastrebenetsky
• Thanks for attention